dr3 – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png dr3 – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Conservatives: “Joe Biden Needs to Bring in More Refugees from Afghanistan” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2021/09/01/conservatives-joe-biden-needs-to-bring-in-more-refugees-from-afghanistan/ Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0000
Benny Johnson: Your standard conservative intellectual

Doesn’t Benny Johnson literally suck cocks?

Like, with his mouth?

(I’m talking about penises, commonly known in the gay community as “fizzle sticks.”)

As far as I’m aware, Benny Johnson has been commonly found licking his own feces off of other men’s penises.

He is of course a big shot over there at The Gateway Pundit or The Daily Wire or The National Review or Human Events or some other website run by kikes, faggots, and “colored folk” (commonly known as “niggers” to sophisticated intellectuals and big wigs).

Anyway – these “conservatives” demanding that Joe Biden bring in more refugees from Afghanistan is just – wow.

That is peak “owning the libs.”

It is like these people owned the libs so hard that they’re going to create a singularity which will suck the entire conservative movement into a singular numeral of the black unemployment rate.

I just can’t process how this is even… what do conservative viewers/readers think of this?

Are they all out there saying “JOE BIDEN THAT RACIST DEMON-RAT, HE NEVER EVEN GOT THOSE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF AFGHANS OUT AND BROUGHT THEM TO GO TO MIDDLE SCHOOL WITH MY GRANDDAUGHTER”?

At some point, people must pause and say: “I get that we’re really owning the libs hard, but what exactly are we promoting here – exactly?”

Please note that Donald Trump himself claimed that Joe Biden wasn’t bringing in enough Afghani refugees.

We’ve been through this, as the regular reader knows.

Here are some relatively recent and very underrated backstories:

The last one, which is the most recent, seems in my brain like the best place to start if you’re new to this level of understanding.

I’ve consistently had a hard time “soundbiting” this up, possibly because I’m actually still personally baffled by it.

Basically, “owning the libs” means that you take on the moral assertions of the Democrats as your own, then claim that you are better at enforcing that morality than them.

It doesn’t matter that this morality is the opposite of the morality of the average Republican voter. In fact, the average Republican voter seems remarkably supportive of the idea that the Republican Party and the Republican commentariat should be focused on zooming in on the extremist left, figuring out what all of their positions are, then explaining that Republicans can accomplish Democrat goals better than the Democrats.

The difficulty is soundbiting it up into bits is that there is some purpose in pointing out that Democrats are not actually accomplishing their own stated goals. However, you should be able to point that out without asserting that the Democrats are bad for not accomplishing goals that Republicans disagree with in the first place.

But somehow, conservatives have utterly failed to differentiate between:

  • “Joe Biden says he cares so much about refugees, but he just abandoned hundreds of thousands of ‘new Americans’ in Afghanistan. Of course, if he misses these ones, he can just pull any number of others in from any other brown country on earth. Maybe this whole refugee agenda isn’t so much about ‘saving brown people’ as it is about replacing white Americans?”, and
  • “OMG JOE BIDEN ISN’T HELPING THESE AFGHAN REFUGEES! JOE BIDEN IS SO EVIL FOR NOT HELPING THESE HELPFUL REFUGEES! SOMEONE NEEDS TO GO TAKE CARE OF BUSINESS AND GET THESE AFGHANIS INTO AMERICA TO GANG-RAPE MY DAUGHTER DOWN AT MIDDLE SCHOOL!”

To me, it seems like you should be able to point out the hypocrisy without actually taking on the position of the Democrats. But Republicans have consistently proved so incapable of this – on the level of politician, media person, and voter – that I’ve started to believe that Republicans should simply avoid pointing out hypocrisy, ever.

They do not appear to be capable of pointing to the hypocrisy without endorsing the position as their own, and claiming that they are “the real X.”

Of course, the most heinous and actually unbelievable example of this phenomenon is Dinesh D’Souza, who claims that Democrats are literally members of the KKK and have an ideological commitment to Nazism. At one point during the BLM protests in 2020, D’Souza claimed that the black rioters were German Nazis. He’s also claimed that Greta Thunberg is a German Nazi. I wrote a really funny article about this many years ago entitled “After Hit “Dems are Real Racists” Film, Disney Signs Dinesh D’Souza for Film Series on Things That are the Opposite of Themselves.”

D’Souza will actually then purposefully mix-up accusations of a secret Demon-RAT KKK conspiracy with basic bitch talking points about “the soft bigotry of low expectations” and how incentivizing single motherhood among blacks through the welfare system harmed black families. He draws zero distinction between claims that the Democrats are literally secretly plotting to kill blacks (a theory that he invented) and traditional Republican criticisms of how Democrats have managed the black problem.

This man is an absolute charlatan, selling pablum to boomers, telling them that he, as a brown man, gives them permission to say that they are not really racists. Of course, they actually are really racists by the leftist definition of “racism,” which simply means “anyone who thinks America should stay pretty much like it was before.” But he gives them a new definition of the term, which allows them to use semantics to escape the (apparently very hurtful) accusation that they hate people for the color of their skin.

This whole thing just spirals into nonsense, and D’Souza gets in the way – majorly – of trying to explain to conservatives the real reality of race, and how wanting to keep America mostly white does not mean that they “hate the color of the skin.” Instead of understanding that, conservatives now go around claiming that the Democrats are actually Nazis who are plotting to kill black people (because they hate the color of their skin).

There should be “adults in the room” – conservative intellectuals calling this nonsense out for what it is. A key element of the nature of a peasant is that he cannot determine the difference between an intellectual and a charlatan who is good at his game.

Beyond just intellectuals and charlatans, and frankly beyond peasants, a person who is uneducated in any field cannot tell the difference between a legitimate expert and a con artist. In the 19th century, people were getting addicted to cocaine by buying “miracle cures” from snake oil salesman. You can look at the case of Anthony Fauci to see this “non-expert inability to perceive expertise” phenomenon taken to its logical conclusion.

Normal people should not be required to be intellectuals. Demanding that plumbers, factory workers, electricians and computer programmers should be capable of identifying an intellectual is a totally unreasonable request. They should in fact be able to rely on social institutions to present them with the people and ideas that they need to make their own decisions.

Unfortunately, the conservative intellectuals were all deplatformed, unpersoned, and their names stricken from history in the 1980s. Because they were anti-Semites. There was no social institution to prevent this from happening, because Jews – a group of people who do not respect the social institutions of non-Jews – destroyed those social institutions on purpose so that they could go on to promote charlatans like Dinesh D’Souza as conservative intellectuals.

Again, I just want to state clearly: I do not think that normal people are to blame for this situation. We can all mock the boomers for believing the sickening gibberish they believe, but they could not have gotten out of this situation. The problem of boomer chronic moronism is truly simply a sub-category of the problem of Jews.

You can watch this 1986 interview with buried conservative intellectual Joe Sobran if you want to understand more of how this all went down.

(Pat Buchanan is the single one who survived this purge of “anti-Semites,” in that he maintained a public identity. But he was not given any serious airtime, and most Fox News viewers don’t know any of his views on anything that matters. Still, they seem to revere him as a kind of mystic, perhaps understanding that there is a difference that they can’t verbalize between him and Dinesh D’Souza. They have some sort of sixth sense, perhaps, that does allow them to sniff out an adult, but they can’t ever really put their finger on it. Actually, I’ve had some success with the boomers in just saying “look up what Pat Buchanan says about Israel.”)

The “D’Souza Effect” is just blatant, inexcusable ridiculousness.

But it is really just proof of concept.

I would expect that the core concept originates from The National Review, and the various associated Jews who took over the conservative movement in the 1980s.

However, there is one single figure that I view as more responsible for this phenomenon than anyone else, and that is Sean Hannity.

When Ted Cruz goes out there and claims that Republicans are working to turn the earth into a solid sheet of ice by shutting down cars, and that it is Republicans who are trying to unleash infinite numbers of Central American children into Iowa and Wisconsin, he is effectively channeling Sean Hannity.

The massive effect that Hannity has had on the conservative movement is not fully understood, and likely won’t be for several more decades. But whenever I see something like a conservative claiming that Republicans are the real standard bearers of leftist ideology, I think of Hannity.

Somehow, my mind was blown when he actually did a serious interview with Bruce Jenner when that boomer tranny was running for governor of California.

But of course he did that.

It doesn’t matter how deranged the leftist idea is: Sean Hannity will take that idea, and claim that “true conservatives” stand for that idea, and that Democrats are failing to do enough to promote that deranged idea.

You see: I failed to soundbite this up, yet again.

The fact that I can’t soundbite it speaks to why it is so effective: the whole thing slips under people’s radar. If you find some conservative talking about how Biden isn’t bringing in enough refugees from Afghanistan, and ask that conservative “why do you want more refugees from Afghanistan?”, this will happen:

  • His eyes will completely gaze over and he will sit there blank for several seconds.
  • Eventually, he will say: “I don’t.”
  • He will then look around, blinking, as if he’s lost his train of thought.
  • He will mumble something along the lines of: “it’s just that Biden is, he’s just, he’s… it’s… we have to… we can’t…”
  • It will trail off, and then he will either completely change the topic or just end the conversation.

It’s literally like some kind of magic spell.

I don’t know how else to describe it, and I don’t really have any better explanation as to why it works so well on these people. I know for a fact that none of them actually support these positions, and yet, every day they end up arguing these positions and cannot explain why.

If I could somehow explain the psychological process involved here, I would. And then I would have my soundbite. But I can’t explain the psychological process, because I simply do not understand it. I do not understand why Ted Cruz can go on Fox News and say that Democrats are causing global warming, and no conservative says “wait, isn’t global warming a globalist hoax?”

I guess if I were to have to try to explain it, I would say that leftists – and by that I mean “the Jews” – are able to so strongly declare their morality that people just somehow accept it as universal morality. But that does not make sense to me, given that these people – the conservatives – already have their own morality and worldview, which they are otherwise capable of asserting.

It is something with the obsession with pointing at hypocrisy, which is the basis of this whole “owning the libs” thing. They just do not seem to grasp that there is a line between “he’s not doing what he says he believes in” and “I WILL DO THE THING THAT HE SAYS HE BELIEVES IN!”

You have already caught them in the hypocrisy. You don’t need to take it any further.

This is literally like if a soccer player were to take the ball from his opponent who was running it to his goal, and then say “oh hey – I got the ball now! You wanna kick the ball in my goal? Well, let me show you how that’s done!” He would then kick the ball into his own goal, and start shouting “BOOM – OWNED!”

Everything that I am trying to communicate in this thousands-of-words-long essay is summarized by this one tweet from Charlie Kirk.

Frankly, I think that these people are being blinded by Satan. As soon as they went along with “no, I don’t agree with homosexuality, but I support them doing it anyway because our values are freedom,” they had abandoned the concept of objective, Christian morality, and entered into a bizarre dance with non-objectivity, which is actually just man playing God.

Thomas Jefferson supported the death penalty for homosexuality. Defending the right of homosexuals to engage in their anal actions “as long as it’s in their own bedroom” is not only not Christian, but has no basis in the (Christian) philosophical history of this country.

You have to have a point of reference, or nothing means anything. The point of reference should always be Jesus Christ, and the traditions that he laid down the foundations for. Anything other than that, and you’re in zero gravity, and you can’t tell if you’re falling down or just floating.

Editor’s Note: This article is much too long, but that really illustrates the nature of the subject matter. Frankly, this is the single most important issue that I have no ability to talk about in a quick and punchy way. 

]]> Invasive Indian Immigrant Dinesh D’Souza Now Says That the Rioting Blacks are German Nazis https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/06/11/invasive-indian-immigrant-dinesh-dsouza-now-says-that-the-rioting-blacks-are-german-nazis/ Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000
Here’s a red pill for you: physiognomy is real. That means you can tell a whole helluva lot about a person by looking at them and examining how it makes you feel. How do you feel when you look at Dinesh D’Souza?

The greasy Indian Dinesh D’Souza, who is a lower-ranking member of my rogues’ gallery, has made a career out of saying that Democrats are actually German Nazis.

Typically, this inexplicable narrative has involved claiming that Democrats secretly somehow hate black people. But what he is saying makes so very little sense that it is easy for him to simply switch it up and start claiming that the blacks themselves are the German Nazis, as he does in this very tweet:

Just to be clear: he’s made his entire career out of claiming that white Democrats are racist against black people. Which, also just to be clear here, is the exact opposite of what he is claiming in the above tweet.

He made several documentary films about it, and a quick search of his Twitter for the word “racist” will show him primarily accusing Democrats of hating black people. I’m not even going to bother to comb through and find “the good ones” – they all just say the same thing over and over and it always reads like parody.

Here he is saying the Nazis copied the Democrats:

So, just to recap: the Democrats are racist Nazis who hate black people. Also, the black people they hate are Nazis who hate Democrats. The racist Nazi Democrats are bowing down to the racist Nazi blacks because… an explanation will follow on Dinesh’s Twitter page, I guess.

I should note, there is a more intellectual argument about how Democrat policies harm black people, which is sometimes framed as “Democrats are the real racists.” That one actually has some truth to it – people from the National Review and so on will go through and show how Democrat welfare policies have harmed the black community. But that is not what D’Souza is doing. As we’ve seen, D’Souza is saying that Democrats literally hate black people and want to kill and sterilize them as part of a eugenics program.

He not only claims that Democrats are secretly Nazis, and that now apparently the blacks are Nazis, but he also claims that people who the media calls Nazis – the old Alt-Right – are secretly Democrats. (The fact that Richard Spencer and other former members of the Alt-Right are now openly promoting communism and telling people to vote Democrat is unfortunate, but completely unrelated to his premise, as when he formulated it, the Alt-Right was still promoting right-wing ideas and supporting Republican politicians. It is possible that Richard Spencer became convinced by Dinesh D’Souza’s thesis, and that is why his Twitter is now just a bunch of cringe memes promoting Joe Biden.)

Please understand: Dinesh D’Souza is not just some random weirdo on the internet. He is on Fox News constantly, and he was given a presidential pardon by Donald Trump (he was convicted of a campaign finance violation). His film, “Obama’s America,” is the second most profitable theatrical release documentary of all time, next to Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 911.”

I wrote a satire piece in 2018 entitled “After Hit “Dems are Real Racists” Film, Disney Signs Dinesh D’Souza for Film Series on Things That are the Opposite of Themselves, which I think was very funny. But reading it now, I feel like it almost fails to capture the absolute absurdity of this individual. He does not care about any of this, because it would be impossible for anyone to care about any of this. It’s just incoherent nonsense. D’Souza is nothing more than a sleazy, slimy Indian conman, milking a bunch of dumb conservatives with the lowest form of anti-intellectual tripe that is in fact so stupid that it is anti-human.

Let me just explain to you what is going on here: Dinesh D’Souza is a brown man who is saying that he’s a conservative and that conservatives are not racist and really, the Democrats are the real racists. That is the entire thing that is happening. He just says that same thing, over and over again, and has been doing it for at least a decade, maybe longer, and making big bucks. The conservatives who listen to him, and buy into this narrative he’s selling, are just the masses of normies who do not process information using logic, but only with emotion and a sense of the social. What they are getting is a brown man absolving them of their imaginary sins.

Please note that we still don’t even know what this “racism” is – is it cops committing a genocide against blacks? Is it saying mean words? Is it wanting to live around other white people? Is it opposing immigration? Is it quoting crime statistics? Is it voting for Donald Trump? Is it microaggressions? No one knows. If someone does know, they’re not telling, because I have yet to hear any definition of this term. It might just be “everything bad, in its totality,” but we just don’t know. The only thing we know is that it’s the most evil thing on earth, ever, for some reason.

The basic thing here is that the left – and by “the left” I mean “the Jews” – have succeeded in making the word “racist” mean simply “evil.” Conservatives buy into this definition of the word just as much as liberals, because it has been recognized as a norm of reality. The sky is blue, “racism” is a metaphysical evil. The ultimate embodiment of evil is the Nazis, because of course, the Nazis were the ultimate racists. Most of this goes back to Hollywood’s portrayal of Nazi Germany, a childish fantasy of the boogieman that has fused itself to reality.

Last year, D’Souza accused Greta Thunberg of being a Nazi – citing her whiteness and braided hair as evidence.

Conservatives are constantly accused of racism – that is, they are accused of being metaphysically evil – and they believe that they can remove that stain by having a brown person tell them that actually, the other side is really the true evil ones. Dinesh D’Souza is a priest of the religion of anti-whiteness (“anti-racism,” they call it) collecting indulgences to wipe away the sin of racism. You buy a movie ticket or a book, he clears your sins. It’s the exact same thing we are seeing now with the Black Lives Matter worshipers. You kneel down, they clear your sins.

Dinesh D’Souza is simply a garbage human being. He is exploiting good natured white American conservatives for massive amounts of money by rigorously doing nothing but saying the same gobbledygook over and over again. What’s more, this benefits him personally, being that he is a brown person who came to our country to exploit us for money. The theory that white people don’t really exist – and that the only people who would try to defend white people are evil – is necessary to explain why the hell he is even here, and he’s paving the way for more of his people to come in by pushing this vile theory.

This situation is an absolute disaster. White Americans should not be in a position where they are so psychologically subjugated by the word “racist” that they go throw their money at an Indian conman to tell them they’re not racists. Someone should be leading these people, and explaining to them that no one even seems to know what racism is, and that it doesn’t matter anyway, because who even cares.

The people are not intellectuals. They cannot figure this out, because they do not process things using facts or critical thinking. They process things emotionally and socially, and in the world of the emotional and the social, “racism,” whatever it is, is a very important signifier of moral standing. You have to break out of that by rejecting the basic assumption that this is real or that it matters. The people would reject it if they simply had leaders who would say, “no, racism doesn’t matter. We don’t really know what it is, but whatever it is, it doesn’t matter. You can prefer to be around white people, you can oppose both legal and illegal immigration, you can be afraid of black people and believe that they’re criminals. This isn’t evil. You’ve done nothing wrong, you’re all good, Christian people. These Jews are just playing some kind of word game with you. Don’t even pay it any mind.”

But the people had no one to say any of that. Instead, they got Dinesh D’Souza to come out and say, “oh yes, racism is real alright – and white people thinking they have a right to exist truly is the most evil thing in all of human history. But let me tell you a secret: the real people who want white people to continue existing are the Democrats. That’s right. Step right up, and I’ll tell you all about it – again and again and again.”

So here we are, trapped in a social paradigm of pure nonsense, where half the country is bowing down to worship black people and the other half is throwing money at an Indian conman who claims to possess the power to absolve them of sin using bizarre codswallop.

]]> Homosexual Neocon Sadist Paul Joseph Watson Celebrates Trump Protecting a Mexican Restaurant https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/03/03/homosexual-neocon-sadist-paul-joseph-watson-celebrates-trump-protecting-a-mexican-restaurant/ Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 3, 2020

Sadistic homosexual Paul Joseph Watson pictured with Hong Kong antifa. Watson traveled to Hong Kong in 2019 to promote leftist violence.

Sadistic homosexual neoconservative Paul Joseph Watson is presumably getting paid by the State Department to promote a Nu-MAGA agenda involving war, homosexuality and stopping socialism.

Watson is considered to be effective at taking fun memes from 4chan and repurposing them for promoting neoconservative programs on his pro-war, anti-racist website “summit.news.”

However, the propaganda he produces simply demonstrates how stupid the entire Nu-MAGA agenda is.

For example, when you see that Donald Trump is shilling for a Mexican restaurant that was harassed by leftists, what is the first thing that comes to your mind?

The first thought that comes to my mind is: “what about all those white Trump supporters that Donald Trump consistently refused to even acknowledge the existence of after they were attacked by leftists?”

The homosexual Watson explains that these are LEGAL immigrants who love Trump and that LIBERAL RACISTS have called them mean names.

Won't be Intimidated! TRUMP 2020

What happened to us in 2016 is happening now. We have the right to support the president and no one can intimidate us. Watch us standing right behind him at his Phoenix ralley here, https://youtu.be/6C0mt8sa8Rw

Gepostet von Sammy's Mexican Grill am Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2020

Watson celebrates the fact that Donald Trump has given the restaurant a good review on Twitter.

I am not a believer in the idea that there is a difference between legal immigrants and illegal immigrants, nor do I believe that liberals are secretly racists who hate Mexicans. In fact, I view someone making these claims as committing an act of psychological warfare against me, as I don’t think that any person genuinely believes these things, and only says them to try to confuse other people.

However, I am not bothered by the fact that some Mexicans support Trump or that Trump is nice to the Mexicans that support him. That can happen without pushing “legal immigration” hoaxes or saying that Democrats secretly hate Mexicans.

The problem is that there have been so, so many white people who have suffered as a result of supporting Donald Trump, and Donald Trump has done nothing to help any of them.

Immediately, I think of the Proud Boys. This was a very standard pro-Trump MAGA group. Several of their members attended a pro-Trump event in New York City, and when they left they were stalked by antifa who were throwing objects at them. When they defended themselves, they were charged with “attempted assault,” because the antifa members wouldn’t press charges for assault and without a victim they could only press charges on the attempt.

We also know of many others Trump has refused to defend. Alex Jones has had his entire business destroyed for promoting Donald Trump. He has been censored on every platform, and is being sued by many Jews. I am able to understand that Trump won’t defend Daily Stormer, because of the optics. But Trump thought the optics of Infowars were good enough that he appeared on the show.

And surely, Alex deserves his support more than a random Mexican shop?

Alex convinced millions of people to vote for Donald Trump. What did these Mexicans do?

The vile nonsense coming from the homosexual shill Watson causes rage inside me, but I believe that his attempts to directly appeal to the MAGA crowd with edgy may-mays he lifts from 4chan and repurposes to promote Jewish wars and racism conspiracy theories ultimately just makes this dumb Nu-MAGA agenda look stupid.

Also, his stupid face on his magic pills ad makes him look stupid.

Seriously – why would you post a picture like that on the internet?

He looks like a Gremlin from Gremlins.

He would make a good ironic tattoo.

I’m just joking, kids.

Don’t get an ironic tattoo of Paul Joseph Watson’s face.

Tattoos are dumb, whether ironic or sincere, and basically, irony has gotten so central to people’s identities that the irony itself is sincere, which creates the ultimate paradox.

]]> #AntifaTerrorists Trending on Twitter After Andy Ngo Attack https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/07/01/antifaterrorists-trending-on-twitter-after-andy-ngo-attack/ Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 1, 2019

I knew that all it would take for boomers to get mad about the endless attacks by the FBI’s street squad Antifa was for a gay gook to get got.

The Saturday attack in Portland on the Quillette journalist Andy Ngo has led to a major backlash. The do-nothing face-talker Ted Cruz is calling for the Mayor of Portland to be sanctioned by the federal government for telling police to allow Antifa to attack people.

And #AntifaTerrorists is trending on Twitter.

Of course, because Twitter is moderated by the Anti-Defamation League – a Jewish-Israeli terrorist group – almost every post that shows up when you click the hashtag is supporting Antifa.

It did indeed start out trending with people complaining about Antifa being terrorists, but now it is all just apologists that are being promoted.

It’s possible that Twitter is actually using this hashtag to find accounts to ban. They definitely don’t like people talking badly about the Jewish darlings of Antifa.

However, if you click “latest tweets,” you can see that it is still being used by people who don’t think masked men should be legally allowed to attack and shut down people who are just trying to express political views.

But I mean – it’s stuff like this:

For those who don’t know, it’s Andy on the right and the one on the left is a white student pouring a milkshake on a black civil rights protester. It must have been a Democrat back then – because Democrats are the real racists. And maybe Antifa is somehow racist or whatever. After all – Andy Ngo is a gay gook.

“Maybe that’s why they attacked him?”, wonders the always confused boomer.

Jewish pro-Israel activist Laura Loomer published an article about how milkshaking is racist (using the same picture that tweeter used).

From it:

We have seen this before. During the civil rights era in the 60’s, rabid racist Democrats would regularly pour or throw beverages on blacks who were engaging in peaceful sit-in protests at local drugstores and diners. They would eventually escalate to brutal beatings, lynchings and other acts of savagery that marked a very dark point in American history. You can read about it here…

It comes as no surprise that these same tactics are now being used by the alt-left and cheered on by the media in this country. They have become so disconnected with their own sanity and reality of the world around them that they no longer view anyone who supports Trump to be a human. They doxx us, deplatform us, debank us, shame us, violently attack us. This is what Trump supporters and conservatives are up against.

“Doxx” (it’s spelled “dox” and the continuous form is “doxing”) and the phrase “disconnected with their own sanity” in the same paragraph.

This is why we lose, people.

Proving you’re not a racist should not be on your list of important things to do. Even if you’re not a racist. This is not a real issue. You do not win by calling leftists “the real racists.” You do not win by spelling words incorrectly and using weird, awkward phrases.

Here’s a video from the same Portland event Andy Ngo was attacked at showing an old man getting beaten with a crowbar and punched by a crowd of people.

It really, really makes you angry to watch that.

It makes you want to go to these protests and fight back against these kikes.

But understand, that’s what it’s designed to do. The FBI agents that organize Antifa want you to go and fight them, so they can hit you with federal charges.

That is one of their main purposes.

The first purpose, of course, is just the obvious one: to shut down freedom of speech in America.

Unlike Europe, where they can just arrest you if you complain about immigration or tranny child molesters at the library, we have a First Amendment in America. They’ve figured out a way to shut everyone down on the internet – “it’s private companies, goyim, and libertarianism is more important than the Constitution” – but they can’t use private companies to stop people from protesting in the streets.

So they formed a private police force in the form of Antifa. They actually serve the same function as the tech companies, in that they come in and shut down your freedom of speech and then, when you complain to the government saying “what about my rights tho?”, the government says “sorry pal, there’s nothing we can do.”

Remember that Project Veritas video with the New York Times editor saying he was friends with James Comey and worked with him when he was in Antifa?

It appears that this person, Nicholas Dudich, just made that story up to impress the chick with the hidden camera (a Veritas employee, who I assume is probably hot, who had gotten a fake job at the NYT to spy). But for whatever reason, a Times employee had the idea in his mind that Antifa is run by the FBI.

You can just say this as a self-evident fact though. You literally do not need any evidence in order to make this claim. The Justice Department refuses to prosecute these people for literally firebombing cars in DC.

If they were not assets of the federal government, they wouldn’t be allowed to firebomb cars in the capitol.

Furthermore, they would have been RICO’d as soon as they started launching these attacks. I mean, this is an organized group operating across the country to do terrorist attacks on political protests of the supporters of the president of the United States. And the Justice Department won’t even investigate it.

And you could try to say “oh but maybe they are just using them for their own purposes” – that would of course be bad enough. But they wouldn’t let these people operate like this unless they were at the very least heavily infiltrated by informants.

And that certainly wouldn’t be hard to do – they let Steven Crowder join.

The mask came off when Dino Capuzzo, an FBI agent, used Antifa as a source when filing a criminal complaint against RAM. In what context does it make sense that the federal police are using a terrorist group as a source for criminal filings?

The only possible context is “these are our guys.”

As far as the old man who got beat with the crowbar – don’t worry about him.

He’s just happy that black unemployment is so low.

]]> Democrats are the Real Transphobes https://www.anglinarchive.com/2019/05/06/democrats-are-the-real-transphobes-2/ Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000 Shmuley Ben Shekelheim
National Review
May 6, 2019

Homosexual conservative Paul Joseph Watson interviews transgender conservative Blaire White. White left the Democrat Party due to rampant transphobia. 

The Democrats have a deranged obsession with promoting the false idea that conservative Republicans are transphobic, when in fact the precise opposite is true. The actual history of the Democrat Party shows that they have always been involved in transphobia, while the GOP has been on the frontlines of fighting for trans rights, trans acceptance, hormone replacement therapy and gender confirmation surgery.

Furthermore, these transphobic Democrats have blamed conservatives for the high suicide rate of transgender folks. In fact, Democrats are also responsible for this, due to their reliance on big government interference in the transgender medical industry.

The lie that the Republican Party is the party of the transphobe is a grand lie, designed to stigmatize and demonize conservatives and their values and principles.

The history of homosexual prejudice in the Democrat Party is long and strong. During the 2008 presidential election, bigoted homophobes Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton both were virulently opposed to homosexual marriage.

The Democrat Party has a long history of sidelining and oppressing queer folk.

Conservatives argued that who a person decides to marry is none of the government’s business. The conservative position has always been that government should stay out of people’s sex lives and let the market decide whether or not gay marriage is an economically sound policy.

Eventually, after decades of cruel oppression, the homophobic Democrat Party had to capitulate to the conservative push to get government out of the marriage industry, and to allow homosexuals to express their love with whomever they want.

Finally, the trans community began demanding their rights, and the Democrats once again stood in the way of their personal individual choices.

While the left loves to claim that the racist and transphobic Alt-Right movement is a part of the Republican Party, it has been proven that these racists are actually all Democrats. The Democrat left also harbors the radical Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist (TERF) movement, which denies that trans women are actually women. Meghan Murphy, a leader of this bigoted group, was banned from Twitter because her hatred was too much even for the radical leftist transphobes that control the site.

This type of anti-trans bigotry is rampant in the Democrat Party.

Murphy is simply the latest in a long line of transphobic liberal Democrats.

The beginnings of Democrat transphobia go all the way back to the beginning of the trans movement, with liberal Democrat Janice Raymond’s book The Transsexual Empire: The Making of a She-Male having been released in 1979 to the applause of the Democrats. Having already invented slavery and the patriarchy, Democrats were excited to have a new group to oppress with big government policies. Raymond wrote: “All transsexuals rape women’s bodies by reducing the real female form to an artifact, appropriating this body for themselves… Transsexuals merely cut off the most obvious means of invading women, so that they seem non-invasive.”

After the book’s publishing, the Democrats, through the government-funded National Center for Health Care Technology (NCHCT), asked Raymond to write a paper on transgender health. She produced “Technology on the Social and Ethical Aspects of Transsexual Surgery,” which ultimately led to the trans community being denied healthcare by the government.

More recently, Jesse Singal, a liberal Democrat writer for New York Magazine, published a 10,000-word defense of a clinic designed to “convert” trans kids back into cisgender “normal” kids.

This attitude of hatred by the liberal left is devastating to trans women and trans men alike, and has no doubt contributed to their high suicide rate.

But the key cause of transgender misfortune is what you might have guessed: socialism.

The socialist left has convinced trans children that it is good for them to get free hormone replacement therapy and gender confirmation surgery from the government. It is no wonder that so many children receive their estrogen injections and surgeries to remove their penises for free, and then feel empty afterwards.

How can anyone ever truly appreciate something that they didn’t work for?

They can’t.

Socialism always leads to feelings of emptiness.

If the government wasn’t meddling in the transgender medical industry, the prices would be lower, and transgender children could easily pay for their own hormone injections and surgical penis removal by working in Amazon fulfillment centers part time after school. However, the “tax and spend” liberal left insists on outlawing child labor, meddling in the free market and driving up costs while driving down wages.

If a seven-year-old boy realizes that he is trans and needs hormone injections and penis removal surgery, he will get greater fulfillment from his treatments by getting a job scanning barcodes at a fulfillment center and paying for it himself. The trans suicide rates would plummet, and social acceptance of trans folk would increase overnight.

Trans kids could also get jobs dancing at gay nightclubs if it were not for liberal Democrat socialist child labor laws.

Our trans kids have a right to work for their HRT.

In recent times, brilliant intellectuals like Dinesh D’Souza and Candace Owens have exposed the fact that Democrats are the real racists. But it is time to accept the historical fact that Democrats are also the real transphobes. They project their bigotry onto conservatives, even while there is no evidence that the conservative movement has ever done a single thing to try and hinder the liberation of trans folk.

]]> Finally, I Agree with Hillary Clinton About a Thing – Blacks All Look the Same! https://www.anglinarchive.com/2018/10/30/finally-i-agree-with-hillary-clinton-about-a-thing/ Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 30, 2018

Hillary Clinton was in New York for a panel with Kara Swisher of the tech site Recode when she actually made a funny joke.

After the moderator confused Eric Holder and Cory Booker, Hillary said, “I know, they all look alike.”

Black people round the world were said to have been “blown the fuck out” by Hillary Clinton’s hilarious remarks about their lack of facial diversity.

I haven’t seen niggers get rekt like this since Dylann Roof.

Racists praised Clinton for saying what we’re all thinking, and some even questioned whether they should have voted for her instead, noting that while Trump has been good on immigration, he’s refused to crack down on the African Menace.

Hillary was also deep friends with the late KKK Exalted Cyclops Robert Byrd.

I certainly have some soul-searching to do. If it turns out Dems actually are the real racists, I might have to consider switching teams. Though it is improbable, it is at least possible that the Democrats are bringing in all of these immigrants so they can slaughter them like pigs when they’re all here.

“Keep your enemies closer,” and all that.

Hillary “Keep Your Enemies Closer” Clinton laughs at the disgusting lack of facial diversity of the Negroid race. 

This could cause problems for Hillary though. The Democrats have really been trying to get her out of the way and this is causus belli.

Of course, now she can just run as a Republican on a “get these monkeys the hell off it” platform and win big. She’s got plenty of name-recognition among Republicans for sure, and people would probably forgive her for all of that criminal shit she did if she successfully oppressed some blacks.

]]> Beaner Activist LYNCHED at Democrat Fundraiser by “Room Full of White People” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2017/07/08/beaner-activist-lynched-at-democrat-fundraiser-by-room-full-of-white-people/ Sat, 08 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Zeiger
Daily Stormer
July 8, 2017

“Beaner scum, your time has come!”
– New Democratic rallying cry.

After their complete and utter annihilation at the hands of Donald Trump, we might be seeing the Democrats reinvent themselves in order to reclaim their lost mojo (and voters).

While most are predicting that the party will go full SJW and get rid of the remaining White males, it seems that instead, they’re going the route of becoming the new KKK.

We’ve already seen the Dems promoting eugenics programs to wipe out minorities, and now it seems that they’re violently kicking out minorities from their fundraisers.

I’m okay with this.

The Washington Free Beacon:

A liberal activist says he was the victim of “blatant racism” while attending a San Francisco fundraiser for Democrat Josh Harder, a frontrunner to be the party’s candidate in one of the California districts being targeted in 2018.

Josh Harder, who is definitely not the one wearing this ghost costume.

Anthony Castillo, a resident of the district Harder is running to represent, says he drove two hours up to San Francisco late last month with the intention of learning more about Harder but was instead “silenced by a room full of white people.”

Castillo says the largest man in the room was openly hostile to him and when he complained about the aggression to the event’s hostess he was grabbed by the arm and thrown out of the house.

“It seemed unbelievable that I—a lifelong resident of CA10, a dedicated community organizer and volunteer, a proud member of our vibrant Hispanic community—was silenced by a room full of white people who allowed the largest white man in the room to harass and intimidate me,” Castillo said in a Facebook post.

“These rich, white, ostensibly concerned Democrats watched as I was dragged from the event by its host, who continued to humiliate and accost me, even as I tried to leave,” he said.

INB4 “dems r da real racists.” r/the_donald may have been right all along…

Here is part of Castillo’s account, which was posted to Facebook:

“As I waited my turn, I listened quietly to the next speaker while taking notes on my phone. From the corner of my eye, I could see the man who had yelled so belligerently walk slowly forward, until he was just inches away from my face. I looked up to see this man staring at me with open hostility, his blue eyes wide and unblinking, his mouth slightly open.

I asked him again to please stop, and was taken aback when the crowd of almost entirely wealthy, white Democrats, shushed me again.This man was well over 6 feet and well over 200lbs, the biggest guy there, by far—and he was right in my face, openly and aggressively harassing me.

“I’m not staring at you,” he taunted. More white faces whipped around to look at me, and more voices yelled for me to be quiet. One woman who identified herself as the owner of the house, asked me repeatedly to calm down as if I were the threat in this situation.

I asked her to ask the big white guy to stop trying to intimidate me. The crowd began shouting and yelling at me, as if I had threatened this man, as if I were at fault for his behavior. The hostess came up to me from behind and [seized] me by the arm and threw me out of the house.”

Thrown out! By a woman! In a Dem fundraiser!

I so, so hope this is true.

But unfortunately, I’m a Nazi – so I know better.

Let’s put our thinking cap on for a moment.

Does this story make any basic sense?

Yeah, wait a minute, here… 

This guy claims to have just requested to ask a few questions. Then everyone got agitated, a big guy came close to watch over him (probably the security guard, lol) and then he was kicked out.

Seems like there’s a little something missing here.

I can see two possibilities.

  1. He pulled this entire thing out of his ass.
  2. He acted aggressively and with a complete lack of self-awareness, then got increasingly agitated as he saw that he wasn’t going to get his way. This led to his being kicked out.

In actual fact, Dems aren’t really embracing their long repressed racism – they would still rather die than be caught being politically incorrect. So the notion that they would behave like stereotypical Hollywood racist villains for no reason is absurd on the face of it.

If a video recording exists of these events, I have a strong feeling this beaner is going to look very foolish.

]]> The Idiocy of “Liberals are the Real Racists” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2017/03/01/the-idiocy-of-liberals-are-the-real-racists/ Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 1, 2017

Of the rhetoric of the hated cuckservative, nothing is more vile than the continued use of the argument that “liberals are the real racists” (alternatively, “Dems R Real Racists,” shorthanded “DR3”).

Above, you can view British cuckservative Pat Condell laying out the argument these people use, in all it’s glory.

Basically, it goes something like this: liberals are the ones always talking about race, always calling people racists, so they are actually racists because they’re thinking about race. Also, liberals engage in the “racism of lowered expectations,” expecting less from non-white minorities, and demanding more is done for them, which infantalizes them and is thus racist. Alternatively, a cuckservative might argue that non-whites are exploited for votes by the left-wing, mainly through welfare programs and other forms of pandering, and that this is racist.

The argument is always presented in terms of “we on the right fight REAL racism and care about not judging people by their skin color.”

This argument was formed as a strategic response to constantly being called “racists” by the left, and feeling that this slur must be deflected, so harmful is it to one’s reputation.

This is understandable, but only if you accept the rules you are being given by the left. It is a way of attempting to change the battlefield of discussion to something that the cuckservative views as more favorable territory, such as real world effects of liberal policy.

But there is no way to make the argument work. They have tried it. It has failed.

Pat Condell makes the argument that Islam is not a race, and so you can’t be racist for criticizing Islam. Except that in reality, everyone thinks of Islam as a racial ideology, fundamentally, because the overwhelming majority of its followers are brown people. And thus even if you are technically correct in saying that it is a religion and not a race, you aren’t going to get anywhere with that line of reasoning, and will ultimately simply come off as dishonest and petty.

The argument looks like this:

Conservative: (Addresses some social problem that is caused by brown people).

Liberal: You are a racist!

Conservative: No, I’m not a racist, I’m simply stating facts.

Liberal: You are stating these facts because you hate the color of the skin!

Conservative: No, please no, I’m not a racist…. you… you are the real racist!

Liberal: Yeah, sure. Whatever, racist.

So, what should these mainstream conservatives do when they are called racists by the left?

The logical thing would be to explain that no, I don’t “hate the color of the skin,” but I am concerned with objective reality, and objective reality dictates that people who have brown skin tend to display behavior patterns which I find distasteful and/or damaging to our society.

So then the argument looks like this:

Conservative: (Addresses some social problem that is caused by brown people).

Liberal: You are a racist!

Conservative: I have no specific hate for any skin color. However, as you are pointing out that this behavior pattern is one which seems to manifest itself among darker skinned people, then perhaps that is something we need to consider. We need to look into why this is happening so much among this specific race, as I seriously doubt it is because of the pigmentation of their skin.

Liberal: It’s because they’re oppressed…!

Conservative: That may be, but nonetheless, a pattern exists which needs to be examined. If we can find specific data which links oppression to this behavior pattern, then we should present that data, and take it into account when we look at how to solve the problem.

Liberal: The only way to stop it is to stop hatred for the color of the skin…!

Conservative: Again, if hatred for the color of the skin is what’s causing the problem, then we need to examine the causes of hatred for the color of the skin as we are figuring out how to solve the problem. By blaming something which is unquantifiable – hatred for the color of the skin – for a problem, you are effectively saying that there is no solution to this problem. I am looking for a solution to this problem, and believe it can be solved if all data is taken into account.

You see.

You take the focus off of their accusation, and put it back on them – without admitting to being a “racist.” Refusing to go on the defensive and beg to not be called a racist is not an admission of racism.

In this way, you can break down the very concept of racism itself, and thus completely undermine the entire basis of their worldview – with minimal effort. Their attacks are based on you accepting that being called a racist is something you cannot bear, and have to defend yourself from. And it’s an argument you cannot win, because it has nothing at all to do with anything – it is an accusation that you are feeling an emotion, made on the basis that there is no way for you to prove you aren’t feeling a specific emotion.

Because the racism they talk about doesn’t actually exist. This racism that they talk about is some kind of irrational hatred for people with a different skin tone. I have been labeled the world’s number one hater, and I have no specific hatred for anyone’s skin color. The concept is just ridiculous and absurd. What I am opposed to is the behavior patterns which manifest in certain racial groups, and the way that these behavior patterns affect my society and the world as a whole.

To go back to Pat Condell: one of these behavior patterns is the religion of Islam. That’s what a religion is, right? It’s a behavior pattern. So, when the liberals call you a racist for talking about Islam, there is a hint of truth there, because you are talking about something that almost exclusively involves brown people. By acknowledging that and then dismissing it, you avoid this nonsensical “NO U” gibberish altogether, and put it back on them to explain why brown people behave in such undesirable ways. Their “it’s because of oppression” line is just a filler argument that they know they won’t ever really have to use in a serious debate, because cuckservatives will just get caught up on trying to explain how they are not racists, and never get to what a racist actually even is, or why people take objection to the collective behavior of non-whites.

We need winning arguments.

“Liberals are the real racists” is not a winning argument.

]]>