I know I’m supposed to publish something interesting and important on Sundays. This week, I was supposed to publish a research paper about BRICS and the upcoming meeting in Kazan. But that did not get finished. Nothing important every seems to get finished these days. But I’ve had a tough year, you know?

Today I have a documentary that is well worthwhile. It’s an account of “war crimes” committed by the Jews in Gaza.

Personally, I don’t believe in the concept of “war crimes,” because all war is a brutal nightmare, and trying to put rules on it is actually ridiculous. However, this documentary, produced by Al-Jazeera and directed by British filmmaker Richard Sanders, who has worked in mainstream British media for decades, making documentaries for Channel 4 and the BBC.

The film is incredibly informative, and even though I’ve obviously followed this war relatively closely, there were several things that were new to me. Anyone who hasn’t been following closely is going to be completely shocked that Jews behave this way.

We already knew that Jews are psychopathic murderers. What I think will shock people most is the behavior of the soldiers, who do things like go through the underwear drawers of dead little girls and sniff panties – filming it, of course, and posting it on the internet for the entire nation of Judea to cheer on.

Fatmericans have tried to claim that these videos are staged, and the filmmaker, Sanders, went through and confirmed everything he showed in the film. The clear vision that you get is that the Jews are an entire race of total psychopathic lunatics on a rampage. Of course, that’s how I’ve always viewed the Jews, and I’m just happy that now the whole world is able to see the truth about these “people.”

This is what is important right now: showing the world what the Jews are. Very often, they will tell you what they are, but you have to let them show the people who they are, and that is what they are doing in the Middle East right now, and the entirety of international Jewry is standing in solidarity with the Israeli (save for a few notable exceptions). This shows that Jews are fundamentally incompatible with normal human civilization, at least when they have power (when they don’t have power, as was the case throughout history before the industrial revolution, they are a menace, but they were closer to a nuisance than an existential threat).

The other thing that is very important for people to understand – normal people, all over the world, not just highly political observers of the global situation – is that there is only one explanation as to why the United States backs Israel in the way they do, and that is because America is totally controlled by the Jews. America is nothing more or less than a state militarily occupied and controlled by the Jews. Because of the stranglehold the Jews have on American industry, on the economy, on academia, and ultimately on the government of the United States, the US Military, the intelligence agencies, all the way down to the police, are soldiers of Jews who will inflict the will of the Jews on Americans and on the world.

I watched an interview with the film’s director on the Glenn Greenwald show, and he called it “perplexing” that the US continues to support Israel. This is funny, as he might actually be perplexed by it. Even for some people deeply involved in analyzing the situation, a series of false preconceptions about the nature of the universe and the nature of man can prevent them from seeing the obvious, which is right in front of their faces. For some people, it is impossible to view the Jews as what the Christian religion says they are: a people eternally cursed for having murdered Jesus Christ, a people in communion with Satan, and therefore a plague on mankind.

Young people, however, are open to this. The fact that most of the people protesting against the wars of Israel are leftists is a point that Jewish shills on the internet attempt to exploit, but the fact is that this is totally irrelevant. It is relevant to absolutely nothing. The only thing that matters is that large groups of people are organizing and exposing the crimes of the Jews, demonizing the Jews as a group, laying the groundwork for a whole new perception of the Jews.

I’ve pointed out that young people change their political views. Many millennials who are now right-wing grew up as teenagers opposed to the Iraq war and therefore considering themselves “left.” (Of course, they probably also had right-wing parents, and therefore fell back on that.) Many of these people protesting Israel now, at least the white men, are going to develop more right-wing views. However, that phenomenon is a fraction of what is important here. What is the most important is that the topic of the Jews is being demystified.

If leftists are out there saying these things about the Jews, it opens up the entire public conversation for anyone to say things about the Jews. A separate matter that I’ve wanted to go into is the fact that Elon Musk on Twitter is now heavily promoting costumed neo-Nazi groups, which is what Jews always do in America when people start talking about the Jews – they spam every space where Jews are discussed with cartoonish and fat neo-Nazism. This is a way of completely silencing right-wing opposition to the Jews by burying them with ugly fatness. This will not work this time around, but it did the last time in 2017.

Of course, right-wingers tend to dislike Moslems, primarily because of the totally Jewish agenda to flood white countries with the worst people from Islamic countries. That is the biggest barrier in getting normal people to rally against Israel and international Jewry: the fact that people do not want to be associated with Moslems. However, I think this documentary is very good in showing the people of Gaza not as extremist Moslems, but just as a totally abused and victimized people. There is no way to watch the documentary and not feel sympathy towards the Palestinians and distain for the Jews. From a right-wing perspective, at least the Moslems are normal people, with normal families, taking care of their women and children, while the Jews are rat-faced satanic serial killers, sniffing the panties of dead little girls. The soldiers themselves are grotesque androgynous men with the same feminine features associated with American Jews.

Another challenge is that right-wing people tend to be individualistic and therefore do not want to condemn an entire group as satanic. This was traditionally not a problem, given that Christianity, which was the cultural zeitgeist of all white people, was opposed to Judaism. Now, of course, Christianity is both much less influential and most Christian denominations have bowed to the Jews. In terms of “all Jews are a problem,” I think that is effectively true, as the overwhelming majority of Jews support Israel and the ones who don’t are probably obsessed with trannies and immigration. But of course, there are some Jews, usually non-religious and unaffiliated, who do not go along with this. Some of the “good Jews” have converted to Christianity, and that should be the argument for all Jews being a problem: their entire identity is based on a satanic cult that celebrates the killing of God.

The other big problem among all people remains a belief in the so-called “Holocaust of the Jews.” That is losing steam now, as the logic presented by the Jews, “people killed us nearly a century ago, so for the rest of eternity, we’re allowed to kill however we want, do whatever we want to anyone, and no one is allowed to question us,” is fundamentally repulsive to normal humans. However, the fact that the Jews have done so much atrocity hoaxing with the October 7th event, with decapitated babies and gang-rapes, breasts being cut off in front of children, all of this Looney Toons, slapstick-type villainy they are lying about in order to justify war, lines up directly with what they did during and after World War II. It’s literally the exact same playbook. It is important to undermine the public’s belief in “Evil Hitler” and “The Holocaust,” but the Jews themselves are undermining this by saying that Iran is Hitler 2 and October 7th was Holocaust 2. (I wish a right-winger with a German or Slavic name that could pass for Jewish would go to Israel and interview Jews and prompt them to tell more of these spectacular stories of October 7th about killing babies and cutting women’s breasts off to throw at their children, as this ridiculous nonsense from the Jews, just like the videos of them sniffing a dead girl’s panties, are the best evidence against the Jews.) The Holocaust hoax cannot stand up to scrutiny, which is why questioning it is illegal in so many countries, and as Jewish standing in the world falls, the Holocaust will fall as well.

However, the logical arguments and explanations for the Jewish problem are not the most important thing right now. Right now, the primary concern is creating massive outrage and opposition to the Jews. It doesn’t need to be organized in any specific direction. Jews have always operated in darkness, enforced a silence about their behavior through nonstop claims of eternal victimhood. Their lies have never been very good. They were always easily disproved. It is simply that they make an emotional appeal to people. When the emotional weight of “oh woe unto us, we are such victims” falls apart, the stupid lies they use to defend themselves will also fall apart. That is why the most important thing is to keep a light on the Jews.

The Jews have insulated themselves inside of onion-like layers of lies, and inside of a year’s time, several of these layers have been stripped off. Israel is no longer considered to be a victim nation fighting against “terrorism.” They are a genocidal occupation state. Further, the fact that the entire US government is Zionist is now no longer a matter of debate. People are now beginning to see that there is an expansive, all-encompassing ethnic network inside of the Western media and government that works for the interests of global Jewry. Dominos are falling, and eventually, the truth will out. Once it is public and no longer a matter of debate that Jews are behind every diabolical thing on the planet earth, disempowering and isolating these Jews will no longer be a problem.

Truth is extremely powerful. It is the most powerful thing in the human realm. It’s also the only weapon that we, the dispossessed, have against these demonic creatures that rule over us with an iron fist. The only job that we have is to expose the truth. Right now, the world’s focus is on Israel, and that has to be exploited to maximum effect.

The reader probably does not think what the Jews are doing to Palestine is the most important atrocity the Jews are committing. Naturally, we in the West are going to be more concerned about the atrocities the Jews are committing against us: flooding us with immigrants, normalizing homosexuality and actively recruiting children into homosexuality, pushing women as the overlords of society, degrading our religion and morality, using the economic system to parasite off of our labor, destroying all of our freedoms through the democracy system, and so on and on. It’s natural for us to be much more concerned about these issues than about wars in the Middle East. But right now, the light is on the Middle East, and therefore that is where we must focus our energies in trying to show people the true nature of the global Jewish menace.

After our second weekend: “Am I Racist?” remains in the box office top 10, it’s the top grossing documentary of the year, top 5 political doc in the last decade, earned 3x its production budget, and our total gross moves us into the top 40 for all docs, all time. And counting.

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 23, 2024

This is really disgusting, frankly.

Matt Walsh works for Ben Shapiro of the Daily Wire, who produces his films and guarantees them a wide release. If a non-Jew made a movie about how “anti-racism” and DEI is a big scam, it would not be allowed to make any money at all. But Shapiro has working relationships with his cousins in Hollywood, so he can get a “right-wing” film released in theaters.

Ben Shapiro is a Jew, and all of this DEI tripe was created by the Jews.

Shapiro isn’t some noble Jew exposing the other Jews. No, he says you’re an “antisemite” if you point at the fact that the entire anti-racist infrastructure was totally created by the Jews as a protection mechanism. Jews want to have “the other” living in white societies so they don’t themselves get identified as “the other.”

Instead of exposing the Jews behind this DEI swindle, Ben Shapiro just makes fun of it and makes huge amounts of money, while knowing that his material is never actually going to have an impact.

I’ve only seen the clips, but I would be shocked if there is not a part in the film about Jews and Israel being our greatest allies.

In order to push back against this “woke” gibberish, you have to point out that the Jews are behind it. Otherwise, it’s just a complete waste of time.

Washington Examiner:

Matt Walsh’s new film Am I Racist? reached the $9 million mark in its second weekend at the box office, making it the highest-grossing documentary film of 2024.

The film, a mockumentary that seeks to showcase how diversity, equity, and inclusion have become a “brainwashing” scheme, expanded to an extra 83 theaters in its second weekend, grossing over $2.5 million across 1,600 theaters. Walsh celebrated the film’s success on X, noting it has now grossed three times its production budget.

…

Walsh sat down with the Washington Examiner last week to recount his experience filming this mockumentary. He explained that he and the crewmembers paid the DEI experts their speaking fees to be featured in the film. Walsh said people will pay “a lot of money” in an attempt to atone for racism and that “DEI grifters” can make up to $15,000 to discuss race and diversity.

One clip in the film, which has gone viral, shows Walsh undercover at a dinner event featuring activists Regina Jackson and Saira Rao, who claim how racist the United States is. Walsh secretly works as a waiter for the dinner, for which the two speakers charged guests $2,500.

Amid the film’s release on Sept. 13, author Robin DiAngelo, who is featured in the film, issued a statement claiming she was deceived into being in the film. The writer, who wrote the book White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism, claimed she believed she would be featured in a film called Shades of Justice, and that Walsh’s film was instead “designed to humiliate and discredit anti-racist educators and activists.”

This is Borat type stuff he does, but he’s not really good at it.

But it’s funny. Even though Walsh is a bad actor and seems nervous doing this surprise interview stuff, it is funny.

In my personal experience, the answer to the film’s title is that Matt Walsh is definitely a racist.

I met him once at a bar in Seattle and asked him about Ben Shapiro, who he called a “baby-killing kike” but claimed he can’t “tell him to pound rocks” because the Jew Shapiro “brings home the bacon.”

“Besides,” Walsh continued, “that Jew let’s me say all I want about the niggers and spics, I can tell niggers to pound rocks all day.” I had never heard the phrase “pound rocks” so many times. In fact, I’d never heard it before.

Walsh then went on a drunken tirade about how he’s considered poisoning Shapiro so he could become “the leader of Daily Wire.” He then began crying.

Seriously: Walsh knows about the Jews and just lies about it to get money from Ben Shapiro. He does this while claiming to be a Christian.

When Candace Owens was kicked out of Daily Wire for being against Israel doing a genocide, he kept is lips zipped.

Basically, this is what selling your soul looks like these days: you’re documentary about “teehee, DEI is a scam” gets in the theaters and you get a couple million dollars shoved down your throat by the Jews, in exchange for an eternity in Hell.

After our second weekend: “Am I Racist?” remains in the box office top 10, it’s the top grossing documentary of the year, top 5 political doc in the last decade, earned 3x its production budget, and our total gross moves us into the top 40 for all docs, all time. And counting.

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 23, 2024

This is really disgusting, frankly.

Matt Walsh works for Ben Shapiro of the Daily Wire, who produces his films and guarantees them a wide release. If a non-Jew made a movie about how “anti-racism” and DEI is a big scam, it would not be allowed to make any money at all. But Shapiro has working relationships with his cousins in Hollywood, so he can get a “right-wing” film released in theaters.

Ben Shapiro is a Jew, and all of this DEI tripe was created by the Jews.

Shapiro isn’t some noble Jew exposing the other Jews. No, he says you’re an “antisemite” if you point at the fact that the entire anti-racist infrastructure was totally created by the Jews as a protection mechanism. Jews want to have “the other” living in white societies so they don’t themselves get identified as “the other.”

Instead of exposing the Jews behind this DEI swindle, Ben Shapiro just makes fun of it and makes huge amounts of money, while knowing that his material is never actually going to have an impact.

I’ve only seen the clips, but I would be shocked if there is not a part in the film about Jews and Israel being our greatest allies.

In order to push back against this “woke” gibberish, you have to point out that the Jews are behind it. Otherwise, it’s just a complete waste of time.

Washington Examiner:

Matt Walsh’s new film Am I Racist? reached the $9 million mark in its second weekend at the box office, making it the highest-grossing documentary film of 2024.

The film, a mockumentary that seeks to showcase how diversity, equity, and inclusion have become a “brainwashing” scheme, expanded to an extra 83 theaters in its second weekend, grossing over $2.5 million across 1,600 theaters. Walsh celebrated the film’s success on X, noting it has now grossed three times its production budget.

…

Walsh sat down with the Washington Examiner last week to recount his experience filming this mockumentary. He explained that he and the crewmembers paid the DEI experts their speaking fees to be featured in the film. Walsh said people will pay “a lot of money” in an attempt to atone for racism and that “DEI grifters” can make up to $15,000 to discuss race and diversity.

One clip in the film, which has gone viral, shows Walsh undercover at a dinner event featuring activists Regina Jackson and Saira Rao, who claim how racist the United States is. Walsh secretly works as a waiter for the dinner, for which the two speakers charged guests $2,500.

Amid the film’s release on Sept. 13, author Robin DiAngelo, who is featured in the film, issued a statement claiming she was deceived into being in the film. The writer, who wrote the book White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism, claimed she believed she would be featured in a film called Shades of Justice, and that Walsh’s film was instead “designed to humiliate and discredit anti-racist educators and activists.”

This is Borat type stuff he does, but he’s not really good at it.

But it’s funny. Even though Walsh is a bad actor and seems nervous doing this surprise interview stuff, it is funny.

In my personal experience, the answer to the film’s title is that Matt Walsh is definitely a racist.

I met him once at a bar in Seattle and asked him about Ben Shapiro, who he called a “baby-killing kike” but claimed he can’t “tell him to pound rocks” because the Jew Shapiro “brings home the bacon.”

“Besides,” Walsh continued, “that Jew lets me say all I want about the niggers and spics. I can tell niggers to pound rocks all day.” I had never heard the phrase “pound rocks” so many times. In fact, I’d never heard it before.

Walsh then went on a drunken tirade about how he’s considered poisoning Shapiro so he could become “the leader of the Daily Wire.” He then began crying.

Seriously: Walsh knows about the Jews and just lies about it to get money from Ben Shapiro. He does this while claiming to be a Christian.

When Candace Owens was kicked out of Daily Wire for being against Israel doing a genocide, he kept his lips zipped.

Basically, this is what selling your soul looks like these days: your documentary about “teehee, DEI is a scam” gets in the theaters and you get a couple million dollars shoved down your throat by the Jews, in exchange for an eternity in Hell.

Who knows if Lincoln sucked cock, but he was definitely a faggot for letting all those niggers loose on the streets.

I think he probably did suck cock, given that no normal person would ever think letting a mass of millions of blacks out into the wild was a good plan.

Breitbart:

The left’s queering of Abraham Lincoln has begun in earnest.

Lover of Men — a new documentary currently in select cinemas, and coming to VOD on October 8 — seeks to answer the question: Was Abraham Lincoln gay? The answer it comes up with is: kind of, maybe, sort of.

In addition, the current Broadway comedy Oh, Mary! depicts Lincoln as gay, with First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln serving as his “beard.” The play, which features drag performances, was written by a gender “non-binary” person named Cole Escola, who uses”they/them” pronouns, and plays Mary Todd.

Speculation over Abraham Lincoln’s sexuality has long been a niche obsession among LGBTQ historians and activists. But it has never been regarded as a serious line of historical inquiry — until now, as LGBTQ activism and woke identity politics have taken over the liberal arts.

Lover of Men: The Untold Story of Abraham Lincoln focuses on Lincoln’s relationships with four men, including his close confidant Joshua Speed, arguing that the friendships were intense and emotional enough to qualify as “homosexual” by today’s standards.

Along the way, the filmmakers trot out a series of “experts” — some of them gay and transgender — to push the speculation forward. One even claims that Lincoln was attracted to a certain type of male — dashing and daring.

…

On Broadway, Oh Mary! has received rave reviews from establishment media critics, including The New York Times, which called the farce “dragtastic” and “one of the best summer comedies in years.”

It seems like you should be able to sue from beyond the grave if people accuse you of being a faggot after you’re dead.

They should probably try to clone Lincoln so he can sue. And then put the clone in prison or have him executed for letting these niggers loose on the unsuspecting public.

Listen up, this is the deal: you have to have gay sex. With men. Your age is irrelevant. Even if you’re a baby, the law is gay sex.

And we’re kicking it up a notch: you have to cut your dick off.

No exceptions. We’re not issuing any waivers.

You have a dick? We gotta chop it.

Christian Post:

Vimeo has removed “Dead Name,” a documentary featuring “three parents whose lives have been shaken and forever altered because their children have declared (or have been given) a transgender identity,” from its platform.

On Monday, CP learned that Vimeo took down “Dead Name” less than two months after the documentary was published on the platform. The former video page now reads, “Gone, baby, gone. Sorry, this page is no longer available.”

“I was very distressed to find ‘Dead Name’ vaporized from Vimeo and without warning,” filmmaker Taylor Reece of Broken Hearted films told The Christian Post on Monday. “The film had been up for 34 days. Sales and rentals were brisk. The response has been incredible from more than 16 countries around the world. But I wasn’t 100 percent shocked because I am familiar with the force that the trans activists use to silence anyone who checks or questions their dogma.”

She added: “No doubt this is disheartening and caused a temporary disruption, but we circumvented this setback … Ironically, every time the trans activists cancel someone, whether it is a journalist, a filmmaker, or a comedian, inadvertently they raise the profile of the piece of work at hand and ultimately give it more sunlight and play than it might have had in the first place.”

The film is now available to watch at deadnamedocumentary.com where viewers can purchase the film for $14.99 or rent it for $9.99.

Vimeo subscribers who purchased the film have not been refunded by the company, nor have they received an email about its decision to take down the film from its site.

Released on Dec. 20, “Dead Name” is an hour-length documentary that weaves back and forth between the stories of three parents whose children struggled with gender confusion due to outside influences.

Reads the film description: “We learn how shocking it is for parents to hear that their children in their mid to late teens have seemingly out of nowhere decided to switch from female to male or from male to female. In another story, we follow one parent’s nightmarish descent into the transgender world as her ex assigns a female gender to their very young son. In all these stories, we find parents struggling with disbelief, loneliness, helplessness, isolation and despair. Ultimately, each one’s ultimate fear is the medicalized transition of their child — though in one story, the path to medicalization may have proven to be fatal.”

It adds: ‘Dead Name’ lets us in on the inner thoughts, the struggles, and the declarations to fight for children who feel lost to them. We have made ‘Dead Name’ to open the conversation, humanize the subject from the perspective of parents, and give them a voice.”

CP commentator Brandon Showalter, who is featured in the film, tweeted that even those who paid for the film no longer have access to it.

Just as this film was starting to gain some traction and moving people deeply because of it’s truly unique angle, POOF! Gone. Here’s a great review from @NBlakeEPPC at The Federalist @FDRLST.https://t.co/92vSXbGCuy

— Brandon M Showalter (@BrandonMShow) January 23, 2023

“What gives? Trans activists censor, that is what they do,” he tweeted.

“Just as this film was starting to gain some traction and moving people deeply because of its truly unique angle, POOF! Gone.”

CP reached out to Vimeo for comment and will update this piece once a response is received.

On its website, Vimeo said it does not allow “videos that are hateful, harass others, or include defamatory or discriminatory speech.” It also claims to “forbid content that displays a demeaning attitude toward specific groups,” including “videos that promote Sexual Orientation Change Efforts (SOCE).”

The CEO of Vimeo is a streetshitter woman

In a previous review of the film, Showalter wrote that “Dead Name” spotlights issues that have largely gone unexamined.

“As public scrutiny continues to grow about the long-term repercussions of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and the hastiness with which psychologically troubled young people are being prescribed such drugs, the potential medical harms are finally being debated more widely. But much less attention has been given to the splintering of families that gender medicalization has wrought, other than firsthand accounts from parents in spaces like the PITT substack and other online forums,” he wrote.

“Dead Name” punctures the prevailing narrative around this highly fraught topic and is a poignant call to consider the perspectives of families that know what it feels like to be on the inside of this struggle.”

It’s good to see Christians finally saying something.

It’s a bit too little, too late, however.

These people went along with feminism, they went along with race-mixing, they didn’t do anything about the gays, and now they’re all like “whaaaaaa?????”

The new CBS Reports documentary, "Arming Ukraine," explores why much of the billions of dollars of military aid that the U.S. is sending to Ukraine doesn't make it to the front lines: "Like 30% of it reaches its final destination." Stream now: https://t.co/Ob7Y3EsWkn pic.twitter.com/YgVbpYZkHn

— CBS News (@CBSNews) August 5, 2022

I’m not really sure how to explain this, but CBS News has released a documentary which appears to have been based on Daily Stormer articles. The documentary is out somewhere, and I haven’t watched it, but the preview they have up on Twitter starts out talking about how no one knows where any of these weapons are going.

They don’t name the people interviewed, but one woman says that there is no mechanism to track where these weapons are going.

Another man says that it is only 30% of the weapons that are arriving at their destination.

Then, some guy with a British (or Australian?) accent says that he “doesn’t care at all” if the weapons are going into the “wrong hands.”

They then interview people saying that the European people were promised that the EU project meant an end to violent conflict, and now the EU is telling their people that the purpose of the EU is a World War against Russia.

I have no idea what it means that the mainstream media is doing documentaries criticizing this war. It probably must mean something. It couldn’t have been produced and then released by accident.

Remember that the context here is nonstop rah-rahing for the war, throughout every level of the Western media, with anyone who questions it being accused of not being patriotic for the Ukraine, and therefore a threat to democracy.

I am going to try to figure out how to watch this documentary. It looks like they want you to pay for it. But it is a pretty big deal to put forward the idea that 70% of the weapons the US is sending are disappearing without a trace. Obviously, the majority of those weapons are going to be sold by Ukrainian officials – but who are they selling them to?

We’ve seen unconfirmed ads online where people are selling various weapons to terrorists in the Middle East, though those appear to be individuals posting these ads. If Ukrainian government officials were selling these weapons in bulk to various terrorist groups, they would not be doing so through ads on the internet.

All in all, there is effectively a zero chance that these weapons won’t at some point be used for terrorism inside of Europe. You can’t just have billions of dollars worth of weapons disappear into thin air and expect that they will never be used. Someone is planning on using them or they wouldn’t be buying them.

It’s very rare for the mainstream media to go against a narrative. You’re not going to see a CBS documentary examining the evidence that Sandy Hook is a hoax put on by crisis actors.

The basic implication here is that the US both started and lost this war due to total mismanagement, and that the media is preparing to blame this all on Joe Biden. I think that’s where we’re headed. All of this super stupid stuff – which is eventually going to be extremely unpopular – is going to get blamed on Joe Biden. Then, in the lead up to the 2024 election, there will be some kind of transformation of the party, where they run a new candidate who blames everything on Biden and vows to fix it all.

The CBS preview starts with a quote from Joe Biden, which sets the tone for “Joe’s stupid war.”

We’ve seen other signs that the Ukraine is getting thrown under the bus. The United Nations and Amnesty International are now both openly accusing the Ukraine of being involved in serious war crimes, particularly with relation to the systematic use of human shields as a core strategic doctrine.

Then you have the US pivoting to China, with the clear purpose of getting the Ukraine out of the headlines.

It doesn’t take much to read between the lines here: the US has lost this war, and now they have to pivot away from it. But people aren’t just going to forget that it happened. So someone is going to have to be thrown under the bus. Joe Biden is completely worthless to everyone, and has been an utter disaster primarily for the Democrats who put all their weight behind this senile old coot, without ever explaining what the goal of a senile president was. But they can just as easily say they didn’t know what was going on, that Biden and his people came in with force and took over.

It’s pretty obvious that the war with China is not going to go any better than the war with Russia, even if they do think they scored a “win” with the Pelosi landing. But if that fails, it’s just another thing they can throw Joe under the bus over.

What this implies in the long-run is that the US is going to have to move away from ongoing geopolitical fiasco, and turn inward. That doesn’t make a lot of sense, as the entire goal of the US since at least the end of World War II has been global domination. There is also the problem that backing off of the world stage after all of these continual humiliations is going to mean that the dollar will be unseated as the global reserve currency, which will mean that the US will no longer be able to keep up the same kind of control at home, because they just won’t have the money for all of these projects.

Of course, the entire world order is based around the dollar as reserve currency, and even these countries pushing back against that – China, India, Saudi Arabia, and so on – have a lot to lose if the dollar falls. Over the last few months, they’ve kind of said “okay, well – we’re just going to take the hit because we don’t have any choice.” Maybe if the US withdrew from the global stage, they would move slower in their plan to unseat the dollar. If I was a Democrat looking forward to 2024, that’s what I’d be hoping for: that there is a way to pull back from the world stage with a kind of “haha, sorry about that, guys. ahaha, no hard feelings…” and then continue to hold a serious position in the world economy without being a vicious bully.

That said, I don’t really think these people are smart enough to pull any of that off, even if they do have a vague plan to do so.

It will be interesting to watch.

British documentary filmmaker Louis Theroux (pronounced “Lewis Thear-roocks) released a film on Nicholas J. Fuentes and the America First movement this week, and it was quite a doozy.

The first and most obvious thing you notice when having watched the documentary is that it appears to be a propaganda film for America First. Theroux is known for making hit pieces on people, and pressing a strict globalist and anal supremacy narrative, so it is confusing how this film was made and then released in this form.

I would say that the film is at least as flattering to Nick and his movement as the iDubbbz Sam Hyde documentary was flattering to Sam Hyde.

The difference is, although you could see how iDubbbz would be sympathetic to Sam, and not really want to go too hard on him, you can’t really imagine why a globo-homo hitman like Theroux would want to make a documentary flattering to the white supremacist and neo-Nazi serial killer Nick Fuentes and his rising movement of genocidal maniacs hellbent on total destruction of the democratic world order.

When Nick said that he was allowing Theroux to attend AFPAC 2 and to do a bunch of other filming for a BBC hit piece, I was, like most other people, pretty skeptical. It did not seem like a good idea. Nick is now saying “see – you should have trusted the plan, this documentary is awesome.”

Here’s Nick saying that.

And I mean – apparently he was right. I don’t really know what else to say. Apparently, he understood that he was bulletproof, and that any hit piece would only function as a promotional piece.

Of course, Theroux could have made the documentary more aggressive and maniacal – he could have played even scarier music. Like, he could have covered the whole documentary with a Blair Witch Project techno soundtrack.

After noting how good the documentary makes the movement look, the second thing you notice is that Nick isn’t hardly even in it. Theroux seems to have become obsessed with Beardson Beardly, and basically made him the star of the film.

I don’t know if this was purposeful or just a result of Beardson really upsetting Theroux personally. Theroux went to his house in Kentucky, and he was talking to him in his front yard, and after a bit of friendly chit-chat, Theroux starts asking him why he did a Nazi salute out of a car after AFPAC. Beardson said he never did that. And Theroux kept pressing him, until Beardson told him to leave, effectively having not gotten any interview at all.

I have to say – this was really amateur hour in terms of basic interview technique. What you’re supposed to do in any interview – especially when you’re trying to make a person admit to something or otherwise make them look bad – is form a rapport with them, then spring the “hard questions” on them, so you catch them off guard. You want to make them think you’re just a friendly guy, and then spring them. Instead, Theroux talked for 45 seconds in a friendly manner and then was like “so why do you love Hitler so much, Nazi?”

Honestly, I don’t even understand how someone who has been making these hit piece films like this for twenty years or whatever could screw that one up so badly. There is no doubt he could have goaded Beardson into saying some stuff that looked bad, but he didn’t even try.

This is like if you go up to a woman at a coffee shop and chat her up for 45 seconds, compliment her, whatever, and then say “HOW ABOUT YOU SUCK MY DICK RIGHT NOW, SLUT?” (The difference is, there’s a nonzero chance the woman would be like “yeah, okay.” No person who knows you’re a hostile interviewer is going to keep going after you accuse them of being a Nazi.)

Anyway, by all appearances, the fact that Beardson told him to fuck off and told him to get off his property seemed to really upset Theroux, which meant that the rest of the documentary was about Beardson, primarily.

Beardson went on stream immediately after telling Theroux to leave, and then Theroux called him on the phone from his car and was like “I’m watching you.” What a weird thing to say? Beardson told him to fuck off again and hung up on him.

So then Theroux went to Brittany Venti’s house to hear about how Beardson had abused her. He played a tape to her of Beardson saying he was going to anally rape her. This was clearly bad optics, and the worst optics in the whole thing – but still kind of funny. I think it was the anal part that was the bad optics though. If it would have just been “I’m going to rape you,” then okay. Or even if it would have been “me and the boys are going to gang rape you” – still, better optics than anal.

For the record, Beardson has said he shouldn’t have said that. But I mean – if that’s the worst thing you can dig up about an entire movement – a bad joke on a livestream that allegedly hurt a woman’s feelings – you’re doing pretty bad in terms of your hit piece.

So then the other main character was Baked Alaska. He’s even the person featured on the promo material.

Baked came across as Baked, just kind of silly and irreverent. I don’t think it was bad optics, and in fact, it really sort of breaks the narrative of “this is the new rising KKK hate movement that wants to do a genocide.” You have to have really high levels of cognitive dissonance to say that Baked Alaska is a genocidal KKK Nazi planning to exterminate everyone.

Theroux sits and listens to an entire rap from Baked, and you can tell he’s trying not to laugh. I just don’t even understand what the point of including that was.

just watched the new Louis Theroux, CT americans fire shots at Brits but this guy lives with you 🤥🤥🤥🤥 pic.twitter.com/oWUbg2sTMx

— moon (@ProfessorMooon) February 13, 2022

There wasn’t really even an attempt to take a shot at Nick throughout, aside from the narration saying “this is the new rising hate movement.”

It’s almost like a fan film. If you would have removed the negative narration and spooky music, you wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between this and a promotional film for Nick’s movement.

No one who is in the movement or supportive of it is going to be turned off by the film. And there’s a very real possibility that it will make people who knew nothing about it interested in it.

It’s not a wonder then that liberals are freaking out about the film.

One semi-self-reflective liberal actually praised Nick and his people, and was shocked that people so smart don’t understand the truth of the WEF agenda.

How can you fundamentally understand society and fundamentally misunderstand society at the same time?

— Marc Burrows (@20thcenturymarc) February 13, 2022

But mostly it was seething, with people saying the film never should have aired.

Here’s a sample of the seethe.

The astroturfed neoconservative DNC shill Hasan Piker also weighed in, distraught that the film aired.

The Guardian actually wrote an entire article whining about how bad it was.

They gave it four out of five stars, then said it did more harm than good.

If all of your enemies are saying “this is really bad for us,” then it’s fair to say you won.

I have no idea how Nick figured out this would be such a big win. But he did.

The website for the coronavirus documentary Plandemic, plandemicmovie.com, appears to have been hacked. It is now forwarding to “watchplandemic.com,” which features a list of SCIENCE! talking points.

The sum total of the site is the word “Plandemic” followed by these bulletpoints:

• Judy Mikovitz is bat shit crazy (COVID pun intended)
• Bill Gates is not patenting any of these drugs … and what the fuck do you think he would do with >$100 million more anyway?
• Masks aren’t going to kill you
• The world is scary now. Believing that this is all part of a global conspiracy is more comforting than the truth. If we give into fear and ignore *actual* science things will only get worse

What is hilarious about this is that it is promoting the ideology of SCIENCE! (as opposed to the scientific method) as a definite and objective form of truth, while also pushing things that SCIENCE! said were false at the beginning of this supposed pandemic.

The health authorities (SCIENCE! priests) initially said that masks would make you more likely to get infected.

They also said that the claim that the virus came from Chinese bats was a racist conspiracy theory.

In fact, Huffington Post was saying that this is racist as recently as last week, and quoting priests of SCIENCE! to back it up, which indicates that SCIENCE! is not only constantly changing, but changing at such a speed that the priests themselves can’t keep up with it.

It is impossible to convince thinking people that there is an ideology that contains an ultimate, religious type of truth but is also constantly changing. Those two things contradict one another.

The idea that Anthony Fauci moved from “all of my models were so wrong no one can even believe how wrong they were” to “now listen to this new thing I’m saying which is absolute fact of reality” demonstrated the utter absurdity of this SCIENCE! doctrine.

“Science” is supposed to be a methodology, not a political dogma. The scientific method has nothing whatsoever to do with SCIENCE! the doctrine, save for that it has the same name. Anyone who actually understands the scientific method and isn’t pushing a political agenda would be opposed to this idea of “science says such and such a thing.” Science is a methodology for determining hypotheses, which must then be confirmed by data.

When someone shows you a graph that shows 2.2 million people dying from hospitals being overwhelmed if you don’t shut down society and says that this is “science,” they are lying. What they are showing you is a scientific theory, which may or may not be correct. In the case of Neil Ferguson and Anthony Fauci’s graphs, we know they were not correct, because the actual data, played out in reality, proved that they were not correct. That doesn’t mean that the scientific method failed, it means that they put bad data into their equations and came up with bad theories that they used to create bad graphs. They did this for political purposes. Scientists who are hired by the government and by Bill Gates continue to use faulty data to create faulty theories which they promote as fact and then call you a “science denier” if you don’t believe them.

The idea that the people who promoted the “flatten the curve” 2.2 million dead hoax have the nerve to claim that anyone else needs to “listen to the scientists” (despite virtually everyone in the scientific community speaking out against it) is so absurd as to be borderline nonsensical.

You are under no obligation to believe these people, any more than you are under an obligation to believe anyone else who is pushing a political agenda. Using the word “science” does not magically give them authority that they did not earn.

As I wrote in my review of the first release of the Plandemic documentary, which I understand is a short film that has been produced separately from a full-length documentary to be released later this year, I am critical of some of what I saw. The film appears to be very new age-oriented, and presented several ideas that I believe are kooky. However, with regards to coronavirus itself, a lot of the information was on point, and was simply citing public sources, which is why it has gained so much popularity.

Many people are now questioning the authorities and their statements about the virus, as well as the bizarre government response to the virus, which basically amounted to “quick! Destroy the economy, make everyone poor and strip them of all of their rights!”

For many people, simply saying “SCIENCE!” is not going to convince them to submit to this brutal new agenda that is being rolled out under the pretext of this virus.

“If you really believe in something, stop going to school and start going on yacht trips” may sound like a weird teaching to convey through a film, but that’s what the upcoming movie about Greta Thunberg is all about.

Daily Mail:

Greta Thunberg’s journey from a ‘quiet teenage schoolgirl’ to the figurehead of a global climate movement has been captured for an upcoming documentary.

Those involved in the project are said to have been following the Swedish teenager since she first began her ‘school strike for the climate’ movement in Stockholm last August.

The film – with the working title ‘Greta’ – is slated for release on Hulu in the summer of 2020, Deadline reported.

If they really have been following Greta for more than a year, then the film may shine some light on her brutal vegan transformation.

Then

Now

Other than that, there’s not much else. The media has already been covering Greta Thunberg’s every move and most people are painfully aware of her existence.

It will be produced by Cecilia Nessen and Frederik Heinig, through B-Reel Films, and is said to be directed by Swedish journalist and filmmaker Nathan Grossman.

The documentary will follow Greta as a ‘quiet teenage girl on the autistic spectrum’ who begins a climate campaign with one simple question: ‘If you don’t care about my future on earth, why should I care about my future in school?‘

That question is retarded, just like Greta Thunberg’s whole “rise to fame” story.

“If you don’t care about me, why should I care about me?”

Are there any climate scientists predicting that Sweden will collapse due to some kind of climate change disaster within Greta Thunberg’s lifetime? If yes, then what makes that one prediction different from all of the previous climate change predictions that ended up being totally wrong?

Furthermore, to actually answer her silly question: she should care about her future in school despite others not caring about her future on earth because she cares about her future on earth.

It will then show the eco-warrior as she becomes a world famous activist when her modest school strike evolves into a global movement within months.

An insider told Deadline that Hulu became involved with the project ‘a while back’ and had been working ‘behind the scenes while deals were being made’.

She was a product all along.

The good thing about this is that people from all over the internet now have an excuse to create all kinds of movie posters featuring Greta.

Here are a few of my all-time favorite Greta pictures in case you’re feeling artistic:

One thing that can’t be said about Greta is that she doesn’t produce a huge volume of funny pictures every time she’s photographed somewhere, so at least this documentary will have some comedic value.

On Tuesday night, MTV – which apparently still exists – aired a defamatory hate documentary about Nicholas J. Fuentes, based on two-year-old footage which they had recorded when Nick was 19 and never released.

The full video is above, but this is what they originally announced it with, hours before it aired, on Twitter:

We're investigating racism in a new documentary special, 'White Supremacy Destroyed My Life.' Former KKK member Shane Johnson talked to right-wing YouTuber Nick Fuentes about how white supremacists use "white pride" to attack racial minorities. Watch TONIGHT at 10p on @MTV pic.twitter.com/MHsunWV06y

— MTV NEWS (@MTVNEWS) December 10, 2019

That is one of the most bizarre clips I have ever seen in my life. This is a prison bitch skinhead with neck tattoos getting all aggressive with a nice young lad from the suburbs. If you watched the video without sound, you would think it was this skinhead attacking Nick for not being a hardcore neo-Nazi. The optics of it are simply unfathomable. And the bizarre way it is edited – I have never seen anything like it.

For some reason, the documentary mixes in the adventures of fat black bitches who went to meet a descendant of Robert E. Lee. They claim their mother was killed by Dylann Roof in 2015.

Basically, they’re trying to say this was Nick Fuentes’ fault.

The Lee descendant, who is a pastor, appeared on MTV in 2017 to denounce white people. And the documentary plays the clip of Nick responding to that.

They bleep out the word “cuck,” which I thought was strange.

The show then cuts to the skinhead whackjob featured in the above clip.

Shane Johnson is only 26, but he has already been a hardcore Nazi and been reformed from that, according to this show.

They then cut – there are a lot, lot, lot of cuts – to Nick at an anti-gun rally, being hilarious.

Again, that is from the original footage from February of 2017.

Then we cut to the interview with Nick and the skinhead lunatic.

I was shocked that the editing in the documentary was the same as in the Twitter preview. I thought maybe someone just did that as a promotional clip. Why would someone think jumping from camera angle to camera angle every 1.5 seconds looks good? It gives you a headache.

This guy is so obviously just a low IQ loser who got offered money to shill. He is a pathetic little worm.

This is the only scene in the whole thing where Nick for a few seconds looks bad, because he’s got this aggressive weirdo getting all up in his face, and he gets a little bit shook.

The skinhead does this thing like a black guy where he refuses to make eye-contact, while also making all of these super hostile motions.

Then, alternately, he is looking him straight in the eye in an insane way.

It’s what the blacks do before they pull a knife on you. It is the cowardly, unhinged form of aggressive posturing, and it is the most likely to end in violence. People recognize on a subconscious level that when a person is moving around like this, looking all around the room and refusing to look you in the eye, then alternatively staring at you right in the eye, they’re likely preparing to catch you off-guard with a deathblow.

I assume this guy was in prison and learned this there.

So Nick has a few moments where he looks shook.

That is literally the only way they were able to make him look bad. By sending a (reformed) skinhead gang member in to threaten him.

The film then shows the fat black bitches going to their mother’s grave.

Before cutting to the skinhead getting a tattoo of a demon over his swastika tattoo.

No explanation as to why he didn’t just get the tattoo removed. It’s basically as cheap as getting a new tattoo at this point.

Finally, we see the fat black bitches eating ice cream.

Ironically – or not – there is basically a zero percent chance that these women will die of anything related to white supremacy, while there is more or less a 100% chance they will die of obesity related disease.

So the ice cream is a lot more dangerous than white people, I can tell you that.

Just so, if MTV actually cared about helping black people, they would do much better to produce a documentary about the way obesity is decimating the black community – particularly women.

But of course, this isn’t about helping black people. It is about harming white people.

The documentary was utterly bizarre.

The editing was basically incoherent, not just in the way the specific scenes were edited with the 1.5 second camera angles, but in the way they tied all of these different things together.

But it won’t have any effect. Nick looked good, he looked normal. And anyone can see that Nick isn’t Dylann Roof.

Here’s Nick’s Twitter thread about the documentary, which he posted last night before it aired.

A guy named Pete Ritchie and his boss Jason Wolfe pitched an episode to me for the reboot of MTV True Life about young political activists which would feature me as a young conservative and an unnamed young liberal. Initially I turned them down! pic.twitter.com/XtmL8FcNuN

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) December 10, 2019

Pete emailed me later that week and offered me a number of assurances that MTV would portray me in a good light and I would have some control or oversight over what was broadcast. After much consideration I reluctantly agreed to participate in the show. pic.twitter.com/bhqFLA18Kk

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) December 10, 2019

Pete and a team from Karga7 came to my house and filmed for a week, doing hours of interviews, B-Roll, they filmed me doing my show and they covered my periscope of an anti-gun rally in Chicago. This is what my mother texted to Pete Ritchie at the end of the shoot: pic.twitter.com/PNdoUO50s1

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) December 10, 2019

Jason Wolfe followed up and said the MTV True Life episode would air on February 20th. The airdate was pushed back several times until it was put off indefinitely and needless to say this episode never aired… but the footage from this shoot will premier tonight! pic.twitter.com/ZAglRaRTJl

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) December 10, 2019

Almost two years after a shoot for an episode of True Life, MTV has repackaged the footage into a mini-doc about “White Supremacy” which attempts to portray me as a spiritual successor to this low IQ skinhead buffoon, conveniently right after Groyper Wars!https://t.co/lRrRcCq2ta

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) December 10, 2019

At the time of this shoot I was 19 years old and had only been doing my show for a year. I initially declined to do the show because I knew “Jason Wolfe” and the media would not be kind to me but I never imagined a farce like this. Obviously I made a big mistake.

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) December 10, 2019

This just goes to show how unscrupulous, vindictive, & evil the media is- they take DECEPTION to another level. MTV sat on this footage for two years only to dump it after the Groyper Wars in a naked and obvious attempt at character assassination. It won’t work. Fuck the media.

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) December 10, 2019

And here’s a fancy treat – Nick streamed the show live last night, and commented on it.

Very funny.

I can reveal that this Jew Wolfe person also contacted me and wanted me to be on his show. I of course did not respond to the email. Or maybe I told him he would have to come to Nigeria and he said no, I can’t remember. It was two years ago and my emails are all set to auto-delete. But I was definitely approached about this.

You never do these things. If they were going to make you look good, they wouldn’t do it at all.

I think Nick knows this now. I guess it’s a lesson everyone has to learn. Except me, I already knew it, and have never subjected myself to any such thing.

I only go on Israeli TV.