There are few things as difficult to talk about as Jewish elites and Jewish ethnocentrism (which, translated into left-wing parlance, could be termed “Jewish privilege and Jewish racism”). For the French case, Paul-Éric Blanrue (see my previous article on his work) usefully documents the numerous cases in which various prominent figures and journalists have spoken of Jewish ethnocentrism or “the Jewish lobby.”

Jewish influence is typically remarked upon by bragging activist Jews, by senior politicians near death, by uncritical commentators, or by critical commentators who, being swiftly punished, usually learn to keep quiet. The penalty for criticism, universal ostracism, is such that Blanrue speaks of “the-lobby-that-doesn’t-exist”: the lobby that everyone knows about and everyone knows must never be spoken about (lest they find themselves in the dock with Alain Soral and Dieudonné M’bala M’bala).

But prominent figures have spoken of Jewish power in France despite this threat. In 1995, President François Mitterrand, near the end of his life and on his last day in office, referred in private to “the powerful and harmful influence of the Jewish lobby in France.”[1] Mitterrand was specifically referring to the constant politico-media pressure that has made the Shoah “the official religion of the French Republic” (in the words of Jewish pundit Éric Zemmour[2]).

In 2007, former Prime Minister Raymond Barre, also close to death, told a radio station: “The Jewish lobby, not only concerning myself, is able to organize operations which are disgraceful. And I want to say it publicly!”[3] Left-wing and media Jews had called Barre an anti-Semite for a slip of the tongue following the 1980 Paris synagogue bombing. In the heat of the moment, he had said the attack had killed both “Jews” and “innocent Frenchmen,” seeming to insinuate the Jews were not innocent. Many Jews and leftists did not accept his swift apology on the matter, exploiting the incident for ideological and political gain.

The early 2000s saw increasing discussion of “the Jewish lobby” by various public figures and journalists, particularly with the steady rise to the presidency of Nicolas Sarkozy, who was more overtly pandering to Jewish groups than was traditionally the case in French politics. The homosexual billionaire and co-owner of the liberal Le Monde newspaper Pierre Bergé, who cannot be suspected of anti-Semitism, wrote in a 2001 book:

[There is] a certain Jewish lobby, whose obvious existence, I do not know why, is denied [ . . .] — [despite the fact] it presents itself as such — and which is as legitimate or illegitimate as the Protestant lobby, the gay lobby, the farmers’ lobby, or the feminist lobby.[4]

The statement clearly reflected the fact that Bergé as a high-level oligarch had had dealings with organized Jewish networks, whose legitimacy he does not contest, and had evidently been told not to discuss it. Similarly, the prominent writer and former center-right MP Dominique Jamet had also spoken of “a Jewish lobby” in France. The journalist Élisabeth Schemla said the reaction to Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ had revealed “the birth of a Jewish lobby, in the full and respectable sense of the term.”[5]

In another register, Algerian Minister for Veterans Cherif Abbés blamed Sarkozy’s election on “the Jewish lobby, which has the monopoly on industry in France,”[6] an overstatement. Conversely, Jewish groups have occasionally bragged about being a lobby, as, for example, when the Union of Jewish Professionals of France (UPJF) gave an award to Sarkozy in 2006 for his work at improving relations between Paris, Washington, and Jerusalem.[7] In short, an ethnic lobby was openly working to distort French foreign policy to better serve perceived Jewish-Zionist interests.

Some Jews have been concerned that the lobby has become too overt. Julien Dray, a Jewish Socialist politician and the founder of SOS Racisme (a Socialist-aligned NGO designed to rabble-rouse Blacks and Arabs, and censor Whites), said in 2008:

We need to get out of this lobby logic and behave in a republican manner. Because if we are going towards a battle between lobbies, the Jewish lobby will lose. [. . .] I think there is a temptation in the community, these past years, to transpose the American model. This is a mistake: The Jewish community must keep its republican traditions and reject communitarianism.[8]

Incidentally, Dray had previously served as Socialist presidential candidate Ségolène Royal’s spokesman and his brother lives in Israel. His comments were made specifically at a time when Sarkozy, as both candidate and later as president, had successfully wooed many Jewish organizations who had traditionally sided with the left. Indeed, Blanrue compares French presidential candidates’ appearing at the Radio J Dinner, an event organized by a Jewish radio station, to American presidential hopefuls’ tradition of groveling before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

Dray’s criticism was a friendly, “internal” one and so was tolerated. The Egyptian-cosmopolitan “Islamologist” Tariq Ramadan[9] was in contrast strongly attacked for pointing out that ethnic bias motivated the pro-Israeli and anti-Palestinian position of many Jewish intellectuals:

Whether on domestic issues (the struggle against anti-Semitism) or on the international stage (the defense of Zionism), we are witnessing the emergence of a new attitude among certain intellectuals who are omnipresent on the media scene. It is legitimate to ask what principles and what interests they are defending above all. We clearly see that their political position responds to ethnic principles [principes communautaires], as Jews, or as nationalists, as defenders of Israel.[10]

Ramadan was roundly attacked — pointing out that some Jews are strongly influenced by their ethnic biases was considered “anti-Semitic” — and has since learned to stick to safer targets, such as indigenous Europeans. On the recent migrant invasion of Europe, he declared: “Europe needs immigrants. [. . .] White Switzerland [. . .] belongs to the past.”[11] Ramadan happily lives in Switzerland but, evidently, feels only contempt for the native population who has been gracious enough to host him.

The point is that all of these politicians and pundits have found that one could not seriously discuss the events of elite French national life without discussing the influence — at times subdued and in the background, at times frenetic and manifest — of Jewish legal, political, and cultural networks. What’s more, a number of Jewish media figures, such as Pierre-André Taguieff, Benard-Henri Lévy, Alain Finkielkraut, and Ruth Elkrieff, have on various occasions shut down any discussion of Jewish racism and influence.

How to speak about Jewish power?

Blanrue’s two books on Jewish influence are not entirely satisfactory in framing the issue, although this is perhaps understandable given the nature of French censorship legislation.[12] Sarkozy, the more moderate work, declines to use the term “Jewish lobby” and the euphemisms are sometimes frustrating. The more virile Jean-Marie is freer and more biting.[13] Blanrue argues Jewish influence is a legitimate question because:

Despite the silence of media professionals, the question of Jewish influence in France, whether concerning the presidential elections or any other event, remains relevant because of the size of the French Jewish community (the third in the world, making up about 600,000 people and placing it quantitatively just behind those of Israel and the United States), because of its media visibility, of the political, cultural, and economic weight which is ascribed to it, and also because of the stated objectives of some of its most prominent representatives.[14]

Blanrue however declines to use the term “Jewish lobby” because this would suggest ordinary Jews are guilty of the crimes of their elites and that, in any case, in France the use of this expression provokes too much emotion to allow for serene, rational discussion.[15]

Blanrue also declines to use the term “Zionist lobby,” although one wonders why. He cites Patrick Klugman, former head of the Union of Jewish Students of France (UEJF), a Socialist politician, and lawyer for SOS Racisme defending the hysterical FEMEN and persecuting nationalists, saying:

Zionism is what today links the greater part of the Jewish people, the Israeli component and the diaspora component. It is a kind of relationship between periphery and center. The center of the Jewish people, as much in demographic and in cultural terms with the rebirth of Hebrew, is in Israel. There are also other peripheral centers: France is one, the United States is another. When I meet an Argentinian Jew, there is a two-thirds probability that we be linked by a feeling of common belonging to a history and a project. Neither of us may be Israeli, but there is a fundamental cultural and ideological link which is Israel. [. . .] Whatever one’s feeling on Israeli policy, there is a link not of citizenship but of ideology, which we call Zionism.[16]

Klugman then starkly presents a kind of psychic and ideological unity binding the world’s Jews together, despite an infinitesimal minority of dissenters.

In any event, Blanrue prefers the term “Zionist networks”:

For my part, I prefer to speak of Zionist networks, or better still of pro-Israeli networks, a terminology which seems to me to better reflect reality in all its complexity [. . .]. The difference ? Networks are potential power lobbies, but not necessarily acting ones. Networks overlap, crisscross, sometimes join forces, compete, promote their interests, but there is no concerted strategy, no central command unit for the whole; networks can show differences. There is no hidden HQ, no “protocols” written by candle-lit men in hoods, during secret meetings in the underworld of the great capitals of the world. Let us leave these ideas of another time to professional conspiracy theorists, hungry for fantasy and secrets.

On the other hand, I will be led to mention and denounce the takeover that some these groups have achieved over the Jewish community, a sort of hostile takeover which contributes to spreading in an misinformed public opinion the idea that “the Jews” speak with one voice.[17]

Suffice to say that Jews in France are massively over-represented in the French political, cultural, legal, and oligarchic apparatus. This, in and of itself, means power in France is distorted by Jewish ethnic biases and perceived interests.[18] What’s more, these elites form specific networks that are often highly ethnically-conscious and work to promote particular ends, such as support for Israel, the sacralization of the Shoah, the persecution the Front National, official censorship and informal ostracism of the politically incorrect, and so on.

Blacks and Muslims: Not as Protected as the “Vanguard of the Republic”

Blanrue also usefully documents the double standard whereby French public discourse accepts some criticism of Islam, immigration, and Gypsies, while being completely intolerant of any criticism of Jews and the Shoah-as-religion meme. This discrepancy in itself highlights Jewish cultural power.

Here it is probably useful to point out that Blanrue apparently converted to Islam in 2009.[19] Nonetheless, he is critical of immigration.[20] This is part of a wider trend among French writers, such as Alain Soral[21] and perhaps Michel Houellebecq,[22] who see Islam as a potential ally in restoring tradition and destroying Jewish-Zionist influence in France. Indeed, there is a tradition of dissident French writers converting to Islam, such as the traditionalist philosopher René Guénon and the revisionist historian Roger Garaudy.

In any event, Blanrue’s compilation of Islamophobic and “racist” statements shows the superior protection enjoyed by Jews in French public discourse.[23] Blanrue provides the following list:

• Former President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing warning of an “immigration invasion” in 1991; the right-wing writer Renaud Camus warning of immigration leading to “le Grand Remplacement” (“the Great Displacement”) and later being purged for noticing Jews occupied all positions in a public radio show dedicated to “French culture”;
• Houellebecq’s stating in 2001 that “the dumbest religion, it has to be said, is Islam”;
• President Sarkozy’s declaring in 2007 that “African Man has not sufficiently entered history”;
• Zemmour’s saying on television in 2010 that “[f]oreign-origin Frenchmen are stopped by police more often because the majority of drug dealers are Black or Arab”;
• actress Véronique Genest declaring “I’m a bit Islamophobic. I don’t mind saying it”;
• then-Interior Minister Manuel Valls declaring in 2013 that “the Roma [immigrants] are to return to Romania or to stay there”;
• Jewish pundit Alain Finkielkraut complaining in 2014 that the French national football team was “Black, Black, Black” (using the English term);
• numerous Islamo-critical or outright blasphemous magazine covers over the years, such as those of Charle Hebdo.[24]

There is nothing more legitimate than critical discussion of such cultural, religious, and ethnic issues, and especially of a group’s ethnocentrism or of demographic transformations of a country. Yet, there is never any similarly critical discussion of Jews in France, despite the fact that Jewish elites and culture, both through French Jews and the political and cultural power of the United States, are patently more influential than Islamic elites and culture.

Blanrue notes:

[E]xcesses on Arabs are allowed, those on Jews are forbidden. Manuel Valls, among others, has stated this in a tone that would not suffer contradiction: “The Shoah, the extermination of the Jews, the genocide, must be sacralized, sacred.” “The Jews are at the vanguard of the Republic.”[25]

Valls, who is now serving as Prime Minister, then openly declared that Jews are a “moral elite” in the French Republic and that we must all worship their real and imagined persecutions. Meanwhile comics like Dieudonné are censored and obscene rags like Charlie Hebdo get millions in public subsidies to insult Christianity, Islam, and French nationalists.

The late President Mitterrand’s former foreign minister, Roland Dumas, declared not too long ago that that the current Socialist Prime Minister Manuel Valls was under “Jewish influence,” notably because of his Jewish wife.[26] Blood runs thicker than water, and certainly direct family ties can bias one’s judgment or lead to conflicts of interest.

But that is quite secondary. Valls is a politician, the kind of “democratic politician” who lives only to serve those with the money and influence to get him in office, and in this he knows he needs “the-lobby-which-doesn’t-exist” and “the vanguard of the Republic” on his side.

[1] Paul-Éric Blanrue, Sarkozy, Israël et les Juifs (Embourg, Belgium: Éditions Oser Dire, October 2009, third edition), 29. I discuss this as well as Mitterrand’s right-wing background and European identity in Guillaume Durocher, “François Mitterrand: European Statesman, anti-American, & Judeophobe,” North American New Right, August 18, 2015.

[2] Éric Zemmour, “The Rise of the Shoah as the Official Religion of the French Republic,” The Occidental Observer, May 12, 2015.

[3] Blanrue, Sarkozy, 29.

[4] Ibid, 32.

[5] Ibid, 31-32.

[6] Ibid, 27.

[7]Ibid.

[8]Ibid, 30.

[9] Alain Soral has amusingly commented on the Ramadan case. In short, Ramadan is the grandson of the Egyptian founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, lives in Switzerland, teaches in British and Moroccan universities, and has launched an Islamic studies center financed by Qatar. Strangely, French media make a point of choosing Ramadan – who is not French – to represent the point of view of French Muslims. Soral has speculated that Ramadan’s objective role, as a rootless cosmopolitan promoted by the French media and financed by the Qatari and British governments, is to promote a pseudo-Islamic theology compatible with Imperial-American and Jewish-Zionist interests. He can be thought of as a Muslim ethnic activist working within the framework of and in collaboration with the wider American Empire. Alain Soral, Video of the Month, February 2012.

[10] Tariq Ramadan, “Critiques des (nouveaux) intellectuels communautaires,” Oumma, October 3, 2003. x

[11]Nadine Haltiner, “Tariq Ramadan: “L’Europe a besoin d’immigrés. Ils sont une aubaine économique,” Radio Télévision Suisse, September 6, 2015.

[12]For an overarching presentation of the issue, see Kevin B. MacDonald, “Understanding Jewish Influence I: Background Traits for Jewish Activism,” The Occidental Quarterly XXX.  and Kevin B. MacDonald, The Culture of Critique , preface to the first paperback edition, https://web.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html

[13]Paul-Éric Blanrue, Jean-Marie, Marine et les Juifs (Embourg, Belgium: Éditions Oser Dire, 2014).

[14]Sarkozy, 26.

[15]Sarkozy, 33-34.

[16]Sarkozy, 36

[17]Sarkozy, 37

[18] Guillaume Durocher, “‘As Happy as God in France: The State of French Jewish Elites,” The Occidental Observer, May 3, 2014.

[19]Blanrue quotes the Venetian writer and womanizer Giacomo Casanova saying: “Mohammedanism is more reasonable than Christianity.” In an interview, he explains that he converted to Islam in rejection of Western Mammonic decadence: “L’historien Paul-Éric Blanrue s’est converti à l’islam en 2009: ‘Devenir musulman a été pour moi une prise de conscience,’” Égalité et Réconciliation, March 13, 2011.

[20]Blanrue recently mocked Pope Francis’ suggestion that every parish host a migrant family on his blog. Paul-Éric Blanrue, “Modeste proposition,” Le Clan de Vénitiens, September 6, 2015.

[21]Soral once spoke favorably of Blanrue for his courageous work on the revisionist historian Faurisson. The two have since fallen out. I will not burden this article with details of the dispiriting tendency for French dissidents to bicker with one another. Perhaps such disputes are inevitable given the highly-independent personality type required of those who go against the grain.

[22]See Guillaume Durocher, “Houellebecq, Islam & the Jews: A Review of Michel Houellebecq’s Soumission,” North American New Right, February 26, 2015.

[23]Blanrue lists: Former President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing warned of an “immigration-invasion” in 1991; the right-wing writer Renaud Camus warning of immigration leading “le Grand Remplacement” (“the Great Displacement”) and later being purged for noticing Jews occupied all positions in public radio show dedicated to “French culture”; Houellebecq’s stating in 2001 that “the dumbest religion, it has to be said, is Islam”; President Sarkozy’s declaring in 2007 that “African Man has not sufficiently entered history,” Zemmour’s saying on television in 2010 that “[f]oreign-origin Frenchmen are stopped by police more often because the majority of drug dealers are Black or Arab,” actress Véronique Genest declaring “I’m a bit Islamophobic. I don’t mind saying it,” Jewish pundit Alain Finkielkraut complaining in 2014 that the French national football team was “Black, Black, Black” (using the English term), and numerous Islamo-critical or outright blasphemous magazine covers over the years, such as those of Charle Hebdo.

[24]Jean-Marie, 11-13.

[25]Jean-Marie, 15.

[26]To not belabor the point, Manuel Valls himself has angrily told Jews questioning his commitment to Israel saying: “I am by my wife eternally attached to the Jewish community and to Israel. Come on!”

Well, France, known for honoring free speech as the most important of their society’s values, has convicted a Black guy for making a joke about Jews.  This country, where free speech is held sacred, locks people up for mocking Jews constantly, but this case was so high-profile even I had thought they might back down.

At least they’re not sending him to prison, as they do many others who are convicted of causing Jews to feel that feel of remembering the gas chambers.

New York Times:

The provocative French comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala was found guilty on Wednesday of condoning terrorism after a Facebook message he posted in January suggested sympathy with one of the gunmen in the attacks that killed 17 people in Paris.

The court in Paris gave him a suspended two-month jail sentence.

Mr. M’bala M’bala was convicted under a new law enacted in November meant to rein in speech supporting terrorism. The law was aggressively enforced by the French authorities in the wake of the January attacks.

While the law allows for up to seven years in prison and 100,000 euros in fines, prosecutors in Mr. M’bala M’bala’s case had sought a fine of €30,000, or $32,000, converted into 200 days of jail time if he failed to pay.

Just days after the attacks that killed 12 people at the offices of the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, one municipal police officer south of Paris, and four people at a kosher supermarket, Mr. M’bala M’bala wrote on his Facebook page that he felt like “Charlie Coulibaly.”

The message, which blended the popular “I am Charlie” slogan with the name of the gunman at the supermarket, Amedy Coulibaly, was posted on a day when millions had rallied around France to condemn the attacks.

David de Stefano, one of Mr. M’bala M’bala’s lawyers, said in a telephone interview that they would appeal Wednesday’s conviction.

“When you put that phrase back in the context of all the other messages he published on Facebook, you realize that he had a peaceful approach,” Mr. de Stefano said. “Publicly and repeatedly, he paid tribute to all the victims of the attacks and clearly condemned the acts.”

Obviously, no one believes that Dieudonné is violent. That is not even the argument being made. The argument is apparently that he could encourage someone else to be violent, but that is stupid. He isn’t even a Moslem, and is certainly not a figure of jihadism. He’s a comedian. And the post was a joke. It was basically a self-deprecating joke, making fun of his own image as an enemy of the Jews.

All this is is harassment by the French ZOG of a man who has repeatedly shown himself as willing to stand up and say the truth about these Jews.

It is very difficult to grasp that this arrest was made at the exact time that millions of French were out on the street ostensibly demonstrating in support of free speech, saying “I am Charlie,” in reference to a satirical magazine whose free speech actually really did cause violence.

If you really wanted to restrict speech for the purpose of preventing violence, you would ban making fun of Moslems, as this is one form of speech that has already been demonstrated, beyond any shadow of a doubt, to cause violence. It happens constantly.

Of course, I don’t support limiting the rights of people to mock Moslems. But to say “yes, you can mock Moslems but you can’t hurt the feelings of Jews” is clearly insane, and I am baffled by the fact that the mainstream has not be forced to acknowledge how insane this is.

Dieudonne M’bala M’bala, a French Negro who would likely be voted as “Daily Stormer’s Black Guy of the Year” if we were to give out such an award due to his hatred of the Jews and their stupid gas chamber hoax, is being investigated by the French government for inciting terrrorism.

His comments came in the wake of the “Je Suis Charlie” nonsense which is going on on the streets of Paris and all of Europe, a gay way of protesting Moslem massacres.

DPA:

Earlier Monday, the Paris prosecutor’s office opened an investigation on charges of advocating terrorism into Dieudonne M’Bala M’Bala, known as Dieudonne, for posting Sunday on his Facebook page that, “tonight, for me, I am Charlie Coulibaly.”

The name Coulibaly makes reference to the Amedy Coulibaly, the gunman who held more than a dozen people hostage at a kosher supermarket Friday, killing four. Dieudonne’s post has since been taken down.

I am not sure as I don’t understand French or Negro humor (as an American, I definitely understand the latter more than the former), but this doesn’t seem to be advocating Islam as much as it is attacking the Jews. It also seems to clearly be a joke.

Last year, Dieudonne had his show shut down by a French court who claimed it was Antisemitic. Though they had convicted him for speech crime eight (8) times, this is the first time they have outright banned his show.

Ironic that in all of the hullabaloo about the importance of the freedom of these Charlie Marxists to mock and agitate the sand monkey and their primitive desert cult, Dieudonne is being told he has no right to hurt the feelings of parasite Jew terrorists.

If you really wanted to limit speech in such a way as limited Moslem violence, you would ban people from insulting their religion, not for making jokes about dead Jews.

Obviously.  Obviously.  Obviously.

I believe Charlie Hebdo had a right to mock Islam, but that is not the point.  The point is, the government is censoring speech under the pretense that certain speech could cause violence, while encouraging the printing of cartoons which actually did cause violence.

This goes to show that “censoring speech to stop violence” is simply a canard, and that it is always about protecting Jews and their agenda.

Not long ago, French pundit and Zionist activist Alain Finkielkraut argued that the only thing that might keep multicultural France united was anti-Semitism: “This great multicultural France that we wanted to see as an alternative to the old France, well, if it exists and when it exists, beyond communitarianism, it is cemented precisely by anti-Semitism.” This was not, one presumes, a call to stoke Jew-hatred as the only thing which might prevent an ethnic civil war in France.

The statement perhaps makes more sense as a Freudian slip, if one bears in mind the late Joe Sobran’s corrected definition of anti-Semitism: “An anti-Semite used to mean a man who hated Jews. Now it means a man who is hated by Jews.”

There is perhaps no better illustration of this than the relationship between the métis Franco-Cameroonian comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala and the venerable French nationalist leader Jean-Marie Le Pen.

Basically, both “offended The Jews” — Le Pen in 1987 by saying academics should be allowed to study a “detail in the history of World War II” like whether or not the Jewish holocaust involved gas chambers, Dieudonné in 2003 by making fun of fundamentalist Jewish settlers and comparing them to Nazis.

Prior to that, neither had anything in common besides Le Pen being Breton and Dieudonné being half-Breton. Nothing had predisposed Dieudonné to any interest in the Jewish Question. Even Le Pen had never shown any particular interest in Jews though, being a virile free man, he refused to engage in self-censorship to bow to political correctness.

Dieudonné had in fact campaigned as an “anti-racist” against Le Pen’s party in local elections. He had been close to the Socialist Party. But then he found out that the hypocrites who had spread the good word of “anti-racism” to the Blacks and Arabs of France were not so tolerant of these same “anti-racist” principles being applied to a certain Middle Eastern ethno-state.

Bernard-Henri Lévy consecrated the fatwah/marriage of the two unbowed Goyim — an umpteenth example of ethnically-motivated sophistry — declaring “Dieudonné, the son of Le Pen.” 

Both Dieudonné and Le Pen are proud men, so neither performed the mandatory teshuva. As a result, both got the mandatory treatment: they were ostracized politically and economically, demonized as the “new Hitlers” of the age, and made to disappear by the entire politico-media system — yimakh shemo — and they retaliated as one is prone to in the face of such harassment in the usual escalatory spiral. The two found solidarity in their loneliness. Dieudonné the métis trolled the Establishment by being friendly with Le Pen the nationalist and spreading rumors that Le Pen was the godfather to his child. That drove them crazy.

Today, many of Dieudonné’s numerous fans (White, Black, Arab) bleed into Alain Soral’s multiracial French nationalist metapolitical movement Égalité et Réconciliation. E&R activists, in turn, passively or actively support Le Pen’s mostly-White and anti-immigration National Front as the only credible French nationalist party. The National Front, for its part, is the only party which has not called for the persecution and a priori censorship of Dieudonné, and has defended his (and everyone else’s) right to free speech. Not union by any means, but a start.

Jim Goad has written that “If the niggers and the rednecks ever joined forces, they’d be unstoppable” — essentially a social class analysis of America’s racial problem. Certainly, seen from Europe, I would say Black and White nationalists in America seem to have a lot of common interests in fighting Hispanic immigration and toppling their shared plutocratic masters. After all, all non-Jews suffer in the face of Jewish racism. We are in a sense all Palestinians. Alliances have been built on shakier ground. There is also room for alliances with “righteous Jews” like Gilad Atzmon and Jacob Cohen who can see that their elites’ hysterical ethnocentrism is likely to backfire against the wider Jewish community.

Such a multiracial alliance is what some French nationalists want to achieve. This may seem unrealistic, and perhaps it is. But at the very least, this movement has deprived the Establishment Left of the adherence of a growing number of non-Whites. And if Alain Finkielkraut is to be believed, certain Jews’ Goy-hatred may well be enough to save France from Balkanization.

Yes, it has gotten to this level: police in Europe are now physically attacking those who peacefully protest that which is not to be protested.

The Jews.  They are not to be protested.

From Israel National News:

Riot police in Brussels Sunday used water cannon to disperse a crowd defying a ban on a gathering of controversial far-right figures including French comic Dieudonne, which critics called an “anti-Semitic hatefest”.

Citing a threat to public order, the mayor of the Brussels district of Anderlecht banned both the meeting and any protests connected to it.

But organizers of the so-called “European Dissidents’ Congress” – a Brussels bookshop and a group called “Debout les Belges!” (Belgians, Rise up!) – urged supporters to head to the venue for “a surprise”, sparking the standoff with riot police.

“It’s over. Everyone should disperse calmly,” said Laurent Louis, the 34-year-old far-right lawmaker and founder of “Debout les Belges”, after police forcefully broke up the crowd of about 500 protesters without making arrests.

“They’re coming down on us, I don’t want any injured,” Louis told the crowd, though about 40 supporters remained outside the venue later.

The event was to bring together a string of far-right figures, including the comedian Dieudonne M’bala M’bala, who has faced repeated accusations of anti-Semitism, Holocaust denial and incitement to racial hatred.

Dieudonne, a longtime cult figure in France, shot to a wider notoriety when footballer Nicolas Anelka performed the comic’s signature quennelle gesture during a match in Britain.

…

The organizers immediately challenged the ban before Belgium’s state council, which was to issue a fast-track ruling, and around 200 supporters and critics of the event had rallied in Anderlecht early Sunday afternoon, many performing the quenelle.

The Belgian League against anti-Semitism, LBCA, Friday filed a complaint before the Brussels prosecutor against what it called “a day of hate, that would serve as a platform for the worst gathering of anti-Semite authors, theorists and propagandists that our country has seen since the end of World War II.”

The Nazi-hunting Simon Wiesenthal Centre rallied behind the calls for a ban, dubbing the event an “anti-Semitic hatefest”.

“The fact that this hatefest is to be held in Brussels, the capital of Europe, the seat of its Parliament… is a threat to democracy reminiscent of the 1920s Weimar Republic, which brought Europe to the Nazi abyss,” the centre’s director for international relations Shimon Samuels warned in a statement. Louis had remained defiant despite the ban.

The Nazi abyss is coming back, Jew, because you brought it back.  Hitler was only ever a response to your behavior.

It is simply unfathomable that the Jews presently hold such power as to tell governments of Europe to physically attack their own citizens for disagreeing with their policies. Note that this wasn’t even a general Antisemitic protest, it was specifically aimed at the government of Israel.

Water Cannons are the last thing they use before bullets. And after they use bullets, you win.

The Jews are claiming that European Antisemitism “might become violent.” This concern was raised in a Monday session of the Knesset Committee for Immigration, Absorption and Diaspora Affairs.

The Jerusalem Post Reports:

The meeting came as an inverted Nazi salute known as the quenelle, invented and popularized by the anti-Semitic comedian Dieudonne M’balla M’balla, was gaining popularity in France.

Committee chairman MK Yoel Razbozov (Yesh Atid) called on MKs at the hearing to work to “suppress” such manifestations of hate. He also called on the nations of Europe and the European Union to promote tolerance. Without decisive action, he stated, anti-Semitic sentiment “might develop into violent action.”

MK Reuven Rivlin (Likud Beytenu) stated that anti-Semitism was “not a danger to the State of Israel,” although it was abroad.

“Anti-Semitism is dangerous to the world, as it has been shown in the past,” Rivlin said. “Therefore, the duty [to combat it] rests primarily on the countries themselves and on leadership in the Christian world.”

Use of the quenelle salute has recently soared. Hundreds of quenelle photos can be found on anti-Semitic forums and on Facebook. Others showing it being performed at Jewish sites and Nazi concentration camps have become especially popular.

The gesture has also been used by a soccer star, soldiers guarding a Parisian synagogue and a French national playing in the NBA. While civil servants could face disciplinary action over the quenelle, rank and file French citizens can perform it with impunity.

Oh, Antisemitism is not a problem in Israel. Hm. Well, maybe you should all just go there. Europeans do not have a right to live there, why should you have a right to live in our nations?

Though I feel this claim of a threat of violence is mostly just normal Jewish cry-babying, it is a fact that Semitism has been violent for a very, very long time, so Antisemitism taking the same form might simply be the natural law of the universe at work, mightn’t it?

As for me, the only form of violence against Jews I support is rounding them up and deporting them to Israel. But when you have mobs forming against you, and marching down the street chanting for you to be removed from the country, as the Jews presently have in France and will very soon have in other European countries, it seems wise to go ahead and remove yourself, before the situation gets any hotter.

In what could only be seen as a huge hypocrisy, the Jews have seen fit to expel Dieudonné M’bala M’bala from Britain before he has even arrived, as they dislike his famous Quenelle salute.

As the snakes tie themselves in knots trying to explain how freedom of expression like that should be banned, while homos promoting sodomy to children in Russia should be encouraged, they have inadvertently brought the gesture to the attention of many who would never have heard of it otherwise.

Thanks to their paranoia and collective guilty conscience, the salute has now gone mainstream throughout Europe, being discussed on talkshows and taking up prime time news slots.

Watch as the people in Europe show their contempt for world Jewry:

I understand that some want to complain that this is somehow not fantastic because Dieudonné is black, but this is wrong-headed. The attention that this Negro is bringing to the Jewish problem is so valuable, it doesn’t matter who he is.

As soon as the Jew is gone, it will be obvious that multiculturalism is a nonsensical scheme that benefits no one in the long term.

I don’t care what color he is. Dieudonné is a hero, and I salute him.

When the Jew is gone, I will demand he be made king of Africa.

The controversial French comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala has been banned from entering Britain after several of his shows were cancelled in France.

Dieudonné had said he would travel to the UK to support his friend, footballer Nicolas Anelka, who is facing a disciplinary hearing after performing a “quenelle” – an allegedly antisemitic gesture – during a Premier League match.

The Home Office has declared the performer persona non grata and warned he will not be allowed into the country. It has alerted airlines, other transport companies and border officials that the performer, whose stage name is Dieudonné, is an “excluded” individual. A spokesperson said: “We can confirm that Mr Dieudonné is subject to an exclusion order. The home “Several of Dieudonné’s shows were banned in France last month at the start of a 22-date tour, amid fears that his stereotypical portrait of Jews and mocking of the Holocaust were a risk to public order.

Dieudonné fans and civil liberties campaigners accused the French government of attacking free speech and of censorship. The comedian rewrote his shows dropping the most offensive material.

Anelka, a striker with West Bromwich Albion, has been charged by the Football Association after performing a quenelle when he scored a goal against West Ham on 28 December. The 34-year-old player said he was expressing his support for his friend Dieudonné, who claims to have invented the gesture, described by some as an inverted Nazi salute.

Dieudonné, who has convictions for inciting racial hatred through his in antisemitic jokes and comments, insists the gesture is simply anti-establishment. However, he has failed to distance himself from groups and individuals who have posted photographs of themselves doing the quenelle outside synagogues, Holocaust memorials, Jewish schools and even at the Nazi death camp at Auschwitz.

Anelka has insisted that he is “neither antisemitic or racist”. The FA hearing is not expected before the end of February.

The document outlining the ban on Dieudonné was leaked to the Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger. It states that the 47-year-old comic “should not be carried to the UK”.

Read More

Reacting to last weekend’s massive anti-Jewish demonstrations in Paris, Jewish musician, author and popular columnist Gilad Atzmon has issued a statement suggesting Jews apologize for hiding their colossal and never-ending crimes against humanity behind their disingenuous shouts of anti-Semitism. “It is time for Jews to look in the mirror and try to identify what it is in Jews in their culture that evokes so much fury,” Atzmon writes.

Upwards of a hundred thousands demonstrators on the streets of Paris had plenty of suggestions for Atzmon and his Jew brethren, as outraged French citizens protested in a “day of anger” against the policies of President Francoise Hollande, especially new laws approving gay marriage which guarantee the further disintegration of traditional nuclear families.

A long-running feud over the social criticism of Holocaust Revisionist comedian Dieudonné helped fuel the recent outburst of anger at Jewish political manipulation in France, whose recent president Nicolas Sarkozy is on the record as having worked for both the Mossad and the CIA.

Dieudonné’s concerts have been banned by the government because he speaks openly of the Jewish lies about World War II. His on-stage antics started a movement called “the quenelle” that has gone viral on the Internet and worldwide on the planet. Jews claim it is cryptic Nazi salute. Those who laughingly use the quenelle movement know it is a forbidden criticism of the powers that be.

Robert Faurisson, whose half century crusade to correct the false Jewish version of WW II history has earned him the title of “dean of Holocaust Revisionism, reported on today’s events:

News from France – January 28, 2014

1) At the big demonstration in Paris last Saturday (January 26, “day of anger”) against President Hollande and his government some participants, at least one with a megaphone, were heard chanting a slogan that can be translated “Faurisson is right: the gas chambers are a sham”. The demonstration gave rise to clashes between marchers and police: there were 262 arrests and 19 policemen injured. Those arrested were all subjected to the burdensome procedure of detention in isolation (garde à vue), in which a lawyer and a physician must be called for each person held.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=uxsldW-B2m0

2) The well-known revisionist “Joe Lecorbeau”, graphic artist and publicist joelecorbeau.com, is under arrest in Toulouse in the context of an inquiry into the posting on the Internet of a photo of a young man making the “quenelle” gesture in front of a Jewish  school in that city: the police have searched his house and seized his computer and other belongings.

3) This morning the comic Dieudonné, friend of the revisionists, saw both his theatre in Paris and his residence in the countryside to the west of the city searched by the police.

France, of course, is one of those European countries in which it is against the law to challenge the Jewish version of the events of World War II, which assert that 6 million Jews were killed by the Germans in their concentration camps. Despite the fact that Jews have reduced the supposed death toll in the Auschwitz camp from 4 million to 1.4 million, it remains a crime throughout Europe to challenge the 6 million figure or other details of Jewish lies about that tragic period in history.

Atzmon, a popular fixture on such well-known false opposition websites as rense.com and Veterans Today, claimed in his statement that the majority of Jews “failed to appreciate the growing mass fatigue of Shoah indoctrination (Holocaust propaganda) and belligerent lobby politics (which is shorthand for Jewish control of all the major governments in the world).

The award-winning saxophone player urged Jews to, “instead of whining about the ‘rise of anti-Semitism’, Jews better, once and for all learn to ask why? Why the Jews again? Why are they hated? What is it in Jewish politics that evokes so much resentment? Why does it happen time after time?”

For someone as popular as Atzmon NOT to know why Jews are resented and hated all over the world strikes me as particularly disingenuous and particularly Jewish, one of the leading traits for why Jews are hated to begin with, which is their utter inability to tell the truth about anything.

In any case, here are some suggestions for Atzmon so that he may better know why Jews are hated everywhere, and why the people of France and every other country have had it up to here with them. Sigh. Where to begin?

1. Jews have stolen everyone’s money. America has gone broke financing wars for Jews all over the world. Every other country is in the same straits. Jews control all their governments. Jews control their media. Jews control their schools, their entertainment, their doctors, their courts, even their priests. The world is controlled by Jews, and everybody’s life — except for rich Jews and their slaves — has never been more at risk.

2. Jews supervised the demolition of the Twin Towers in New York City and blamed it on contrived Islamic patsies, thereby green lighting an endless string of wars against Muslim countries, which has now been extended to ALL countries regardless of their religious orientation. The emphasis on war has become so intense that now the United States government is making war on its own people — can anybody realistically deny this? — because it is following the orders of Jews who control all the money in the world.

3. A Jewish company known for slave trading and weapons manufacturing now controls the world’s food supply, and as a result everybody — and every living thing — is in the process of dying a premature death — from the bees to the sardines to your neighbors trying to live on poison junk food from the convenience store because it’s all they can afford.

4. Jews have turned your children into poisoned zombies through medicines they are forced to take and lies they are forced to believe. No girl who takes Gardasil will bear normal children, and no boy who excels in school will ever be able to think outside the box and know that all the history he has learned is a lie written by Jews.

5. Jews promote homosexuality and unceasingly bash religions in order to destroy families, which is their last rival in controlling the world and every mind in it. With no family or no religion to believe in, everyone is easy prey to the lies they get everyone to believe. Thinking for yourself is now a crime. You see it being proven in the streets of Paris tonight.

6. The control of media by Jews is so complete, and its synchronization with government objectives so perfect, that new iterations of this string of false flag atrocities to achieve their totalitarian objectives are no longer necessary. Now, they can have the media simply report what has happened and the objective is achieved. The public believes what they are told, no matter what has actually happened. We see this vividly demonstrated in the so-called mass murder of schoolchildren in Connecticut, which never actually happened, and in the false flag bomb drill at a race in Boston, where no one was killed except the person they chose to blame for the event.

And another path of false history created by Jews deepens the darkness that now descends on us all.

7. If everyone in the world knew all the bad medicines Jewish doctors have foisted on their naive and trusting patients, and how many beneficial medicines they have suppressed in the interest of making more money by keeping people sick, Jews would have no place in the world that was safe enough to hide.

8. If everyone in the world knew how Jewish pimps lured starving girls out of poverty stricken Russian provinces and imprisoned them in Tel Aviv prison where they could be endless defiled by Israeli pervs, or murdered little Palestinian kids for sport so their organs could be removed and sold to deteriorating kosher lemmings in New Jersey, then no amount of apologizing could save them from the victims’ irate relatives.

9. If everyone knew how totally the Jews have controlled the U.S. government throughout the 20th century, how they caused both World Wars, invented the Jewish hell bomb, put fluoride in the water, poisoned the polio vaccine, and intimidated a group of Jewish psychiatrists into declaring homosexuality normal  . . . well, what would you do to them?

Needless to say, this list of reasons why Jews are hated could be much longer, is much longer.

Apologies for this criminal, pathological, sociopathic behavior are not in order, because everyone knows a sociopath doesn’t mean what he says. And only a sociopath could defend Judaism.

No, the only appropriate behavior for Jews considering what they have done to the world would be mass suicide.

Of course, since they will never realize their guilt, we know that won’t happen.

And it devolves to us to achieve that same necessary objective in order to have any hope of saving a decent, healthy world from the Jews, who have no concern for its welfare. Or the welfare of anyone except their sick and twisted selves.

Reading the French press about the “Affaire Dieudonné”, it is shocking to see how prevalent anti-free speech attitudes now are in France among the elite classes. Perhaps almost as shocking as the demands to suppress freed speech is the fact the people making them almost always accompany them with fervent expressions of support for free speech. It seems the human mind is capable of almost limitless self-deception. We see this continually with Jews, even in the comments on this website, who proclaim their support for free speech “but Holocaust denial isn’t free speech” or “except Hate Speech”. I remember a few years ago I was watching something about the German government. There was this minister in the government, a Green, I think. She must have been in her 60s. She had purple hair. She obviously still considered herself a crazy rebel fighting against the system, just like in ’68. Yet the government of which she was a part was sending people to prison for expressing unapproved opinions, depriving them of their livelihood, trying to shut down opposition political parties. It is amazing that people can support these kinds of initiative yet still consider themselves anti-totalitarian freedom fighters.

Just to clarify what has been happening, to those who haven’t been paying that much attention. The French Conseil d’Etat agreed to ban Dieudonné’s performance in Nantes a priori.

The claims that the criminally liable remarks whose natures calls national cohesion into question heard during performances of the show Le Mur [The Wall] in Paris will not be repeated in Nantes are not sufficient to rule out the serious risk that there will be new infringements of the respect for the values and principles, particularly the dignity of the human person, consecrated by the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizens and by Republican tradition.

Source

This concept of an a priori ban on something, or prior restraint, is unknown in French law, which is instead based on the model of retrospective prosecution of “crimes” once they have occurred. They are now just making it up as they go along, inventing completely new principles to support their diversity mania, banning the performance of a show because of the mere possibility that some “objectionable” remark will be made during it. Shocking.

It’s a good illustration of the general principle of the corrosive effect on liberty that diversity has. When different peoples live in the same land, their genetically-conditioned lack of empathy with one another, will cause them to act in ways that members of other ethnic factions find injurious or offensive. The other factions will react to the injury, sometimes violently. These reactions will cause the government, in the interests of preserving public order, to gradually infringe liberty more and more. Only a cast-iron constitutional commitment, like the American first amendment, can stand as a bulwark against these tendencies. And even that I would expect to be subject to continuous and growing pressure.

We Europeans are having our lands colonised by alien peoples. And as these aliens – Jews, Arabs, Africans – pursue their absurd quarrels with one another, it is our freedom that is being chipped away.