Stunning and brave

Beauty is a way to oppress trannies.

We should finally admit: being a disgusting freak is the real beauty.

The patriarchy has made us believe that beauty is not repulsive.

Fox News:

One of the world’s largest beauty companies, Coty, accused dictionaries of “ageism” and “sexism” in their definitions of beauty in a new campaign highlighting their effort to “undefine beauty.”

Coty, which owns brands such as Covergirl and Kylie Cosmetics, started a petition on Change.org that called for dictionaries to change the “outdated” definition of beauty.

“The criteria in the definition in the major English Dictionaries – or more specifically the examples used to illustrate it, were born in a different time and have not aged well. The implicit ageism and sexism in the current definition are anachronistic,” Coty’s online petition said.

Coty cited two examples used to explain the definition of beauty.

“I was struck by her beauty,” one example read. Another said, “she was considered a great beauty in her youth.”

“This cause to change the definition of beauty acknowledges all those who celebrate and express their own visions of beauty every day, and validates those who have felt excluded by restrictive definitions of beauty,” Coty wrote in their online petition.

The petition has garnered over 1,300 signatures.

How hateful are the goyim? There are millions of goyim, and only 1,300 support the tranny agenda?

This is why even the best of the goyim deserve to die.

Dictionary.com revealed their 2022 word of the year to be “woman” in December.

Coty CEO Sue Nabi wrote in a letter to dictionary publishers that it was time to update their definition.

“Seen through the lens of today’s society and values, the definition of beauty hasn’t aged well. Of course, not all people are impacted by, or feel excluded by these definitions,” Nabi said. “But the implicit ageism and sexism in the examples were born in a different time. We believe it’s time to bridge the gap – time to bring the definition to where society is today. By changing the definition, if more people feel included – feel beautiful – there will be a ripple effect which touches us all.”

“At Coty, we believe that no one can control or dictate what is, or is not, beautiful,” Nabi added.

No one.

Except for ugly tranny freaks.

They are the only ones with a right to decide what is beautiful.

Just a quick update on the total destruction of reality here for you.

The Post Millennial:

Neopronouns have become all the range among the non-binary set, who wish to express not only that they identify as neither male nor female, but that they identify as something separate, special, and apart from that which the rest of the normies can truly understand.

Now, Dictionary.com, which recently declared “woman” the word of the year simply due to the confusion caused by the term now being inclusive of men who identify as women, has added the neo-pronouns sie, ve, xe, ze, and zie to the list that already included he, she, and they.

The word woman is defined as anyone who “identifies as female,” though it’s unclear what “identifying” as a biological sex that one is not actually means.

So special are those in this subset of the LGBTQIA+ group that they have come up with pronouns for themselves that are as unique as DNA, intended for use by those who are referring to these people in the third person. And Dictionary.com has embraced them.

Peter Boghossian posted screenshots of the words, and the definition for “ze,” which reads “the person being discussed or last mentioned (used as a neopronoun in place of the gendered pronouns he and she).

…

It is unclear how a listener would understand that hir was differentiated from her.

The neopronoun “ze” has now been added to https://t.co/OycFiivK63 and https://t.co/HdKQ1diQUN. pic.twitter.com/9BzzKw94UE

— Peter Boghossian (@peterboghossian) December 18, 2022

Colleges and universities go out of their way to embrace this pronoun subset, giving instructions on what to do if you accidentally offend someone who you referred to in the third person, meaning it’s likely that this misreferred to person is not even present. One should “Admit the mistake and correct yourself as soon as you can,” says Penn State.

Spotted at Penn State. Resources on personal pronouns including “ze” pronouns and neopronouns pic.twitter.com/aLJmrQ3ez6

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 15, 2022

Wild Woman Writing Club responded that neopronouns are simply another denial of reality in a digital world.

“In the digital age, there is no one ‘the dictionary’, just countless reality-denialism activists working to ‘queer’ the definition of woman & obscure sex via idiotic ‘neo pronouns’ in their tech ‘engagement’ jobs,” she wrote.

In the digital age, there is no one “the dictionary”, just countless reality-denialism activists working to ‘queer’ the definition of woman & obscure sex via idiotic ‘neo pronouns’ in their tech ‘engagement’ jobs.

— Wild Woman Writing Club (@wwwritingclub) December 18, 2022

Preferred pronouns are decidedly for the self-obsessed, who use them to demand that others refer to them in a specific way even when they are not present.

…

Proponents of preferred neopronouns issue endless videos explaining to viewers how to use these pronouns. One TikToker teaches how to use a nearly infinite variety of pronouns, like “shark/sharks,” “flower/flowers,” “that/thats,” and so many, many more.

These are neopronouns- you can take any word you like and turn it into a “preferred pronoun.” We’re expected to respect and affirm all these pronouns pic.twitter.com/84NuvvT5qN

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 12, 2022

Woke teachers go out of their way to “affirm” students’ pronouns, and to keep those pronouns secret from parents. Some parents use props, like a doll, to train their children to use parents’ preferred pronouns. Even the US Navy has issued their directives on using preferred pronouns.

It’s all very normal.

It’s also sustainable, completely.

In 100 years from now, this will still be happening, and society will not have collapsed at all. If anything, the surgeries to transform genitals will be more advanced.

No one should even be worried about this in any way.

A California man has been charged with making terroristic threats against longtime dictionary publisher Merriam-Webster over the company’s inclusion of LGBTQ ideology in some of its definitions.#JustTheNews

Read more ➡️https://t.co/Tjvl2O71hc

— Just the News (@JustTheNews) April 23, 2022

We have to protect the sanctity of our tranny dictionaries.

This is who we are in a democracy, because of our values.

RT:

A California man has been charged with making threats to commit violence against Massachusetts-based Merriam-Webster, publisher of the authoritative dictionary. The man left what officials described as “hate-filled” and “despicable” messages under the dictionary’s entries for “woman,” “female,” and “girl,” which have recently been changed to account for ‘gender identity.’

Jeremy David Hanson, 34, was arrested in California on Tuesday and charged with one count of interstate communication of threats to commit violence, the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts said in a statement released on Friday.

According to the complaint against him, Hanson sent various threatening messages last October through the dictionary’s ‘contact us’ form, and in comments sections below several contentious entries.

“It is absolutely sickening that Merriam-Webster now tells blatant lies and promotes anti-science propaganda. There is no such thing as ‘gender identity’,” he allegedly wrote under Merriam-Webster’s entry for “Female,” which since 2020 describes not just “the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs,” but also “having a gender identity that is the opposite of male.”

In a message to the site’s administrators, Hanson allegedly called for Merriam Webster’s offices to be “shot up and bombed,” accusing the dictionary of caving “to the cultural Marxist, anti-science tranny agenda” and participating in “the Left’s efforts to corrupt and degrade the English language and deny reality.”

“Hate-filled threats and intimidations have no place in our society,” said US Attorney Rachael Rollins. “We believe Hanson sent a multitude of anonymous threatening and despicable messages related to the LGBTQ community that were intended to evoke fear and division.”

Yeah, real talk – putting aside this gibberish from the judge about “LGBTQ community,” you can’t send emails talking about bombs and shootings.

This degree of prosecution is obviously insane.

Federal proecutors have charged a California man with threatening to bomb the headquarters of @MerriamWebster over the dictionary's definition of "girl," "woman," and "female," blaming what he called "the cultural Marxist, anti-science tranny agenda" https://t.co/hsbOxz2MPD

— Gillian Branstetter (@GBBranstetter) April 22, 2022

But any time you send a message about shooting and bombing, you’re probably going to get arrested and charged with something.

I understand people get angry. But men need to learn to overcome their anger. Nothing good ever resulted from anger.

I have a big self-help Sunday article planned on this topic, but I haven’t been able to pound it out yet.

It seems unlikely it will happen tomorrow – but maybe it will?