I knew that all it would take for boomers to get mad about the endless attacks by the FBI’s street squad Antifa was for a gay gook to get got.

The Saturday attack in Portland on the Quillette journalist Andy Ngo has led to a major backlash. The do-nothing face-talker Ted Cruz is calling for the Mayor of Portland to be sanctioned by the federal government for telling police to allow Antifa to attack people.

And #AntifaTerrorists is trending on Twitter.

Of course, because Twitter is moderated by the Anti-Defamation League – a Jewish-Israeli terrorist group – almost every post that shows up when you click the hashtag is supporting Antifa.

It did indeed start out trending with people complaining about Antifa being terrorists, but now it is all just apologists that are being promoted.

It’s possible that Twitter is actually using this hashtag to find accounts to ban. They definitely don’t like people talking badly about the Jewish darlings of Antifa.

However, if you click “latest tweets,” you can see that it is still being used by people who don’t think masked men should be legally allowed to attack and shut down people who are just trying to express political views.

But I mean – it’s stuff like this:

For those who don’t know, it’s Andy on the right and the one on the left is a white student pouring a milkshake on a black civil rights protester. It must have been a Democrat back then – because Democrats are the real racists. And maybe Antifa is somehow racist or whatever. After all – Andy Ngo is a gay gook.

“Maybe that’s why they attacked him?”, wonders the always confused boomer.

Jewish pro-Israel activist Laura Loomer published an article about how milkshaking is racist (using the same picture that tweeter used).

From it:

We have seen this before. During the civil rights era in the 60’s, rabid racist Democrats would regularly pour or throw beverages on blacks who were engaging in peaceful sit-in protests at local drugstores and diners. They would eventually escalate to brutal beatings, lynchings and other acts of savagery that marked a very dark point in American history. You can read about it here…

It comes as no surprise that these same tactics are now being used by the alt-left and cheered on by the media in this country. They have become so disconnected with their own sanity and reality of the world around them that they no longer view anyone who supports Trump to be a human. They doxx us, deplatform us, debank us, shame us, violently attack us. This is what Trump supporters and conservatives are up against.

“Doxx” (it’s spelled “dox” and the continuous form is “doxing”) and the phrase “disconnected with their own sanity” in the same paragraph.

This is why we lose, people.

Proving you’re not a racist should not be on your list of important things to do. Even if you’re not a racist. This is not a real issue. You do not win by calling leftists “the real racists.” You do not win by spelling words incorrectly and using weird, awkward phrases.

Here’s a video from the same Portland event Andy Ngo was attacked at showing an old man getting beaten with a crowbar and punched by a crowd of people.

It really, really makes you angry to watch that.

It makes you want to go to these protests and fight back against these kikes.

But understand, that’s what it’s designed to do. The FBI agents that organize Antifa want you to go and fight them, so they can hit you with federal charges.

That is one of their main purposes.

The first purpose, of course, is just the obvious one: to shut down freedom of speech in America.

Unlike Europe, where they can just arrest you if you complain about immigration or tranny child molesters at the library, we have a First Amendment in America. They’ve figured out a way to shut everyone down on the internet – “it’s private companies, goyim, and libertarianism is more important than the Constitution” – but they can’t use private companies to stop people from protesting in the streets.

So they formed a private police force in the form of Antifa. They actually serve the same function as the tech companies, in that they come in and shut down your freedom of speech and then, when you complain to the government saying “what about my rights tho?”, the government says “sorry pal, there’s nothing we can do.”

Remember that Project Veritas video with the New York Times editor saying he was friends with James Comey and worked with him when he was in Antifa?

It appears that this person, Nicholas Dudich, just made that story up to impress the chick with the hidden camera (a Veritas employee, who I assume is probably hot, who had gotten a fake job at the NYT to spy). But for whatever reason, a Times employee had the idea in his mind that Antifa is run by the FBI.

You can just say this as a self-evident fact though. You literally do not need any evidence in order to make this claim. The Justice Department refuses to prosecute these people for literally firebombing cars in DC.

If they were not assets of the federal government, they wouldn’t be allowed to firebomb cars in the capitol.

Furthermore, they would have been RICO’d as soon as they started launching these attacks. I mean, this is an organized group operating across the country to do terrorist attacks on political protests of the supporters of the president of the United States. And the Justice Department won’t even investigate it.

And you could try to say “oh but maybe they are just using them for their own purposes” – that would of course be bad enough. But they wouldn’t let these people operate like this unless they were at the very least heavily infiltrated by informants.

And that certainly wouldn’t be hard to do – they let Steven Crowder join.

The mask came off when Dino Capuzzo, an FBI agent, used Antifa as a source when filing a criminal complaint against RAM. In what context does it make sense that the federal police are using a terrorist group as a source for criminal filings?

The only possible context is “these are our guys.”

As far as the old man who got beat with the crowbar – don’t worry about him.

He’s just happy that black unemployment is so low.

Homosexual conservative Paul Joseph Watson interviews transgender conservative Blaire White. White left the Democrat Party due to rampant transphobia. 

The Democrats have a deranged obsession with promoting the false idea that conservative Republicans are transphobic, when in fact the precise opposite is true. The actual history of the Democrat Party shows that they have always been involved in transphobia, while the GOP has been on the frontlines of fighting for trans rights, trans acceptance, hormone replacement therapy and gender confirmation surgery.

Furthermore, these transphobic Democrats have blamed conservatives for the high suicide rate of transgender folks. In fact, Democrats are also responsible for this, due to their reliance on big government interference in the transgender medical industry.

The lie that the Republican Party is the party of the transphobe is a grand lie, designed to stigmatize and demonize conservatives and their values and principles.

The history of homosexual prejudice in the Democrat Party is long and strong. During the 2008 presidential election, bigoted homophobes Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton both were virulently opposed to homosexual marriage.

The Democrat Party has a long history of sidelining and oppressing queer folk.

Conservatives argued that who a person decides to marry is none of the government’s business. The conservative position has always been that government should stay out of people’s sex lives and let the market decide whether or not gay marriage is an economically sound policy.

Eventually, after decades of cruel oppression, the homophobic Democrat Party had to capitulate to the conservative push to get government out of the marriage industry, and to allow homosexuals to express their love with whomever they want.

Finally, the trans community began demanding their rights, and the Democrats once again stood in the way of their personal individual choices.

While the left loves to claim that the racist and transphobic Alt-Right movement is a part of the Republican Party, it has been proven that these racists are actually all Democrats. The Democrat left also harbors the radical Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist (TERF) movement, which denies that trans women are actually women. Meghan Murphy, a leader of this bigoted group, was banned from Twitter because her hatred was too much even for the radical leftist transphobes that control the site.

This type of anti-trans bigotry is rampant in the Democrat Party.

Murphy is simply the latest in a long line of transphobic liberal Democrats.

The beginnings of Democrat transphobia go all the way back to the beginning of the trans movement, with liberal Democrat Janice Raymond’s book The Transsexual Empire: The Making of a She-Male having been released in 1979 to the applause of the Democrats. Having already invented slavery and the patriarchy, Democrats were excited to have a new group to oppress with big government policies. Raymond wrote: “All transsexuals rape women’s bodies by reducing the real female form to an artifact, appropriating this body for themselves… Transsexuals merely cut off the most obvious means of invading women, so that they seem non-invasive.”

After the book’s publishing, the Democrats, through the government-funded National Center for Health Care Technology (NCHCT), asked Raymond to write a paper on transgender health. She produced “Technology on the Social and Ethical Aspects of Transsexual Surgery,” which ultimately led to the trans community being denied healthcare by the government.

More recently, Jesse Singal, a liberal Democrat writer for New York Magazine, published a 10,000-word defense of a clinic designed to “convert” trans kids back into cisgender “normal” kids.

This attitude of hatred by the liberal left is devastating to trans women and trans men alike, and has no doubt contributed to their high suicide rate.

But the key cause of transgender misfortune is what you might have guessed: socialism.

The socialist left has convinced trans children that it is good for them to get free hormone replacement therapy and gender confirmation surgery from the government. It is no wonder that so many children receive their estrogen injections and surgeries to remove their penises for free, and then feel empty afterwards.

How can anyone ever truly appreciate something that they didn’t work for?

They can’t.

Socialism always leads to feelings of emptiness.

If the government wasn’t meddling in the transgender medical industry, the prices would be lower, and transgender children could easily pay for their own hormone injections and surgical penis removal by working in Amazon fulfillment centers part time after school. However, the “tax and spend” liberal left insists on outlawing child labor, meddling in the free market and driving up costs while driving down wages.

If a seven-year-old boy realizes that he is trans and needs hormone injections and penis removal surgery, he will get greater fulfillment from his treatments by getting a job scanning barcodes at a fulfillment center and paying for it himself. The trans suicide rates would plummet, and social acceptance of trans folk would increase overnight.

Trans kids could also get jobs dancing at gay nightclubs if it were not for liberal Democrat socialist child labor laws.

Our trans kids have a right to work for their HRT.

In recent times, brilliant intellectuals like Dinesh D’Souza and Candace Owens have exposed the fact that Democrats are the real racists. But it is time to accept the historical fact that Democrats are also the real transphobes. They project their bigotry onto conservatives, even while there is no evidence that the conservative movement has ever done a single thing to try and hinder the liberation of trans folk.

I ain’t even mad.

Hate is learned, and this negress just taught a lot of gullible White boomerfags a valuable lesson.

Raw Story:

A woman identifying herself as “Reformed Republican” posted a photo of herself in a “Make America Great Again” hat and announced she refused to hide any longer. The way the story ended, however, was not the way Republicans would have hoped.

“I will not hide any longer,, [sic] the left has made us feel as if us black republicans [sic] should hide!! but not anymore!! #BlacksForTrump #WalkAway #maga”

I will not hide any longer,, the left has made us feel as if us black republicans should hide!! but not anymore!! #BlacksForTrump #WalkAway #maga pic.twitter.com/YA0hnarxaY

— reformed republican (@chckpeas) October 27, 2018

Not long after she tweeted again:

“thank [sic] you all so much for your overwhelming support. After seeing this tweet my parents cut me off and refuse to pay my university tuition. So if you can find it in your hearts to help, this young black Republican pay for school it would be appreciated.”

She showed text message conversations about finding a place to live and only having a part-time job because she’s in school. 

I don’t know if these texts were originally real or not, but they were definitely not from her mum / to her pic.twitter.com/CcVoj8TOLJ

— Alex Bruce-Smith (@alexbrucesmith) November 4, 2018

Lol. Damn.

Seriously, this negress really followed through and that’s respect-worthy.

She posted a GoFundMe link to a since-deleted request for help. She raised over $150,000 off of conservative donors. Once she was finally outed, she explained that it wasn’t stealing because Republicans aren’t people, to begin with. 

SAVAGE AF.

https://twitter.com/alexbrucesmith/status/1059199707342204929

BLOWN THE FUCK OUT.

But hey, perhaps this is a learning moment?

Lol. Who am I kidding? These idiots will just huff and puff and call it another DemocRAT scheme to shift blame on the noble negro. They’re boomers!

At best, they will “take the high road” and wish this negress well in college and tell their friends, “well, at least she’s staying off the streets!”

Seriously. 

Now, if it came to a fundraiser for a white kid, you better believe these cheapass boomers would become ham-fisted.

Why?

Well, because muh bootstraps, muh summer waiting tables, muh firm handshake, muh gumption and all their other enraging self-congratulatory bullshit.

Lol, vote for Trump in the midterms and then again in 2020 and then just die, please.

I feel such overwhelming second-hand cringe and embarrassment from your antics that I lack the words to even express what I feel and I say this as someone who writes like 5000 words a day.

Here have a meme from a beloved millennial cartoon, instead.

Wow. Hillary tries to crack joke after Moderator confuses Eric Holder and Cory Booker: “I know they all look alike” pic.twitter.com/K1BpdShf8k #maga

— Matt Batzel (@MattBatzel) October 29, 2018

Hillary Clinton was in New York for a panel with Kara Swisher of the tech site Recode when she actually made a funny joke.

After the moderator confused Eric Holder and Cory Booker, Hillary said, “I know, they all look alike.”

Black people round the world were said to have been “blown the fuck out” by Hillary Clinton’s hilarious remarks about their lack of facial diversity.

I haven’t seen niggers get rekt like this since Dylann Roof.

Racists praised Clinton for saying what we’re all thinking, and some even questioned whether they should have voted for her instead, noting that while Trump has been good on immigration, he’s refused to crack down on the African Menace.

Hillary was also deep friends with the late KKK Exalted Cyclops Robert Byrd.

I certainly have some soul-searching to do. If it turns out Dems actually are the real racists, I might have to consider switching teams. Though it is improbable, it is at least possible that the Democrats are bringing in all of these immigrants so they can slaughter them like pigs when they’re all here.

“Keep your enemies closer,” and all that.

Hillary “Keep Your Enemies Closer” Clinton laughs at the disgusting lack of facial diversity of the Negroid race. 

This could cause problems for Hillary though. The Democrats have really been trying to get her out of the way and this is causus belli.

Of course, now she can just run as a Republican on a “get these monkeys the hell off it” platform and win big. She’s got plenty of name-recognition among Republicans for sure, and people would probably forgive her for all of that criminal shit she did if she successfully oppressed some blacks.

Of the rhetoric of the hated cuckservative, nothing is more vile than the continued use of the argument that “liberals are the real racists” (alternatively, “Dems R Real Racists,” shorthanded “DR3”).

Above, you can view British cuckservative Pat Condell laying out the argument these people use, in all it’s glory.

Basically, it goes something like this: liberals are the ones always talking about race, always calling people racists, so they are actually racists because they’re thinking about race. Also, liberals engage in the “racism of lowered expectations,” expecting less from non-white minorities, and demanding more is done for them, which infantalizes them and is thus racist. Alternatively, a cuckservative might argue that non-whites are exploited for votes by the left-wing, mainly through welfare programs and other forms of pandering, and that this is racist.

The argument is always presented in terms of “we on the right fight REAL racism and care about not judging people by their skin color.”

This argument was formed as a strategic response to constantly being called “racists” by the left, and feeling that this slur must be deflected, so harmful is it to one’s reputation.

This is understandable, but only if you accept the rules you are being given by the left. It is a way of attempting to change the battlefield of discussion to something that the cuckservative views as more favorable territory, such as real world effects of liberal policy.

But there is no way to make the argument work. They have tried it. It has failed.

Pat Condell makes the argument that Islam is not a race, and so you can’t be racist for criticizing Islam. Except that in reality, everyone thinks of Islam as a racial ideology, fundamentally, because the overwhelming majority of its followers are brown people. And thus even if you are technically correct in saying that it is a religion and not a race, you aren’t going to get anywhere with that line of reasoning, and will ultimately simply come off as dishonest and petty.

The argument looks like this:

Conservative: (Addresses some social problem that is caused by brown people).

Liberal: You are a racist!

Conservative: No, I’m not a racist, I’m simply stating facts.

Liberal: You are stating these facts because you hate the color of the skin!

Conservative: No, please no, I’m not a racist…. you… you are the real racist!

Liberal: Yeah, sure. Whatever, racist.

So, what should these mainstream conservatives do when they are called racists by the left?

The logical thing would be to explain that no, I don’t “hate the color of the skin,” but I am concerned with objective reality, and objective reality dictates that people who have brown skin tend to display behavior patterns which I find distasteful and/or damaging to our society.

So then the argument looks like this:

Conservative: (Addresses some social problem that is caused by brown people).

Liberal: You are a racist!

Conservative: I have no specific hate for any skin color. However, as you are pointing out that this behavior pattern is one which seems to manifest itself among darker skinned people, then perhaps that is something we need to consider. We need to look into why this is happening so much among this specific race, as I seriously doubt it is because of the pigmentation of their skin.

Liberal: It’s because they’re oppressed…!

Conservative: That may be, but nonetheless, a pattern exists which needs to be examined. If we can find specific data which links oppression to this behavior pattern, then we should present that data, and take it into account when we look at how to solve the problem.

Liberal: The only way to stop it is to stop hatred for the color of the skin…!

Conservative: Again, if hatred for the color of the skin is what’s causing the problem, then we need to examine the causes of hatred for the color of the skin as we are figuring out how to solve the problem. By blaming something which is unquantifiable – hatred for the color of the skin – for a problem, you are effectively saying that there is no solution to this problem. I am looking for a solution to this problem, and believe it can be solved if all data is taken into account.

You see.

You take the focus off of their accusation, and put it back on them – without admitting to being a “racist.” Refusing to go on the defensive and beg to not be called a racist is not an admission of racism.

In this way, you can break down the very concept of racism itself, and thus completely undermine the entire basis of their worldview – with minimal effort. Their attacks are based on you accepting that being called a racist is something you cannot bear, and have to defend yourself from. And it’s an argument you cannot win, because it has nothing at all to do with anything – it is an accusation that you are feeling an emotion, made on the basis that there is no way for you to prove you aren’t feeling a specific emotion.

Because the racism they talk about doesn’t actually exist. This racism that they talk about is some kind of irrational hatred for people with a different skin tone. I have been labeled the world’s number one hater, and I have no specific hatred for anyone’s skin color. The concept is just ridiculous and absurd. What I am opposed to is the behavior patterns which manifest in certain racial groups, and the way that these behavior patterns affect my society and the world as a whole.

To go back to Pat Condell: one of these behavior patterns is the religion of Islam. That’s what a religion is, right? It’s a behavior pattern. So, when the liberals call you a racist for talking about Islam, there is a hint of truth there, because you are talking about something that almost exclusively involves brown people. By acknowledging that and then dismissing it, you avoid this nonsensical “NO U” gibberish altogether, and put it back on them to explain why brown people behave in such undesirable ways. Their “it’s because of oppression” line is just a filler argument that they know they won’t ever really have to use in a serious debate, because cuckservatives will just get caught up on trying to explain how they are not racists, and never get to what a racist actually even is, or why people take objection to the collective behavior of non-whites.

We need winning arguments.

“Liberals are the real racists” is not a winning argument.