More voting news for all you voters out there.

BBC:

Independent presidential candidate Robert F Kennedy Jr does not meet the legal requirement of a New York resident and therefore cannot be on the state’s election ballot, a judge has ruled.

Kennedy’s claim of a New York address as his “place of residence” on nominating petitions was a “false statement”, said Judge Christina Ryba.

Judge Christina Ryba

As a result, the petitions were considered invalid. Mr Kennedy has rejected the judge’s ruling and vows to appeal.

If the ruling is upheld, it would not only bar Mr Kennedy from the New York ballot but could also lead to challenges in other states where he uses that address.

Mr Kennedy dismissed the ruling as a partisan attack and noted the judge as a Democrat.

“They aren’t confident they can win at the ballot box, so they are trying to stop voters from having a choice,” he said in a statement.

“We will appeal and we will win.”

Mr Kennedy, 70, had argued in court that he considered New York his home since childhood and intended to return.

He currently lives in California which he moved to in 2014 to be with his wife, Curb Your Enthusiasm actress Cheryl Hines.

In court, Mr Kennedy sought to make the case that he has been renting a bedroom from a friend in Katonah, roughly 40 miles (65 km) north of Manhattan.

The friend, Barbara Moss, testified in court that she charges Mr Kennedy $500 (£301) a month. She also said there was no written lease.

Mr Kennedy also offered evidence of his residency by showing that he pays New York state taxes and has a law practice in the state.

However, in her 34-page ruling, Judge Ryba said “the overwhelming credible evidence introduced at trial” suggested that Mr Kennedy only held a New York address for “political standing”.

“Given the size and appearance of the spare bedroom as shown in the photographs admitted into evidence, the Court finds Kennedy’s testimony that he may return to that bedroom to reside with his wife, family members, multiple pets, and all of his personal belongings to be highly improbable, if not preposterous,” the judge wrote.

Mr Kennedy is the most well-known independent candidate but his popularity appears to have plummeted since Democratic Vice-President Kamala Harris entered the race.

The polls don’t seem real.

But it doesn’t matter, because voting isn’t either.

RFK should join the “don’t vote, it’s gay” movement and just start encouraging people to not vote at all.

Kamala is intimidated by his manliness

Please stop with this woman shit.

Please, just stop.

It doesn’t work.

Stop with the woman shit, and stop with the Alex Jones blaming Arabs for things Jews do.

ANSA:

Centre-left politician and rights activist Anna Paola Concia is to coordinate the ‘Educating in Relationship’ project aiming to tackle gender-based violence (GBV) in Italian schools, Education Minister Giuseppe Valditara told the parliamentary commission of enquiry on femicide during a hearing on Thursday.

Concia, a member of the centre-left Democratic Party (PD), has always supported the rights of women and of the LGBT community in Italy and abroad.

Italy’s first openly lesbian lawmaker during the 2008-2013 parliament, in recent years she has brought Didacta Italia, the spin-off of Didacta Germany, the world’s most important event on the school of the future, to Italy.

“I have been working with Valditara since he became minister and we get on very well,” Concia told ANSA following the announcement.

Giuseppe Valditara, man who gets along well with communist dykes

“We have also discussed the issue of violence against women, when we first met he said he wanted to create a project against gender violence, on the culture of respect.

“Then he asked me to lead ‘Educating in Relationships’ and I accepted. I have been doing battles for 30 years and now an education minister wants to make a serious commitment on this issue.I am happy,” she added.

“I will put all my experience at the disposal of the country and of an important battle to be fought, which does not have to have a political colour.

“I am doing this for all women, for Giulia (Cecchettin, ed.) and for the new generations. I would like to involve Giulia Cecchettin’s father,” concluded Concia.

The bitch with her “wife,” Ricarda Trautmann, who may or may not be Jewish

The project ‘Educating in Relationships’ took its cue from high-profile events before the summer involving GBV and was presented officially in the aftermath of the femicide of 22-year-old Giulia Cecchettin by her former boyfriend on November 11.

“A big mobilisation is underway, for the first time in Italy an experiment of this kind is being conducted to address the issue of sexism, machismo and psychological and physical violence against women,” said Valditara presenting the project in the Senate.

The minister said the scheme includes civic education from elementary to high school and a specific project targeting high school students through discussion groups.

Teachers are also being asked to introduce the culture of respect in all school activities, he added.

Yep yep yep.

Big respect.

Everyone has nothing but respect.

We’re just… very tired. 

Her full statement

Appearance on Tucker Carlson Tuesday night

I don’t really like all of the jerking off conservatives do over Tulsi Gabbard. To be clear, I mean the metaphorical jerking off. Literal jerking off is the prerogative of the jerker, and none of my business.

But she supports abortion, gays, communism, and everything, she is just against war and outrageous anti-white hatred. The Republicans act like they swayed her into leaving the Democrat Party, but really it was the Democrat Party that did that. I don’t really get the whole thing of acting like she’s the best person ever because she agrees with two right-wing talking points.

Fox News:

Former Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard announced she left the Democratic Party on Tuesday, denouncing the organization as an “elitist cabal.”

Gabbard, who retired from the House of Representatives in 2021, attacked the institution in a nearly 30-minute video posted to her YouTube account. She did not announce plans to join the Republican Party or adopt any other political affiliation, however.

“I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue & stoke anti-white racism,” Gabbard said in an excerpt posted to Twitter.

She went on to call on other moderate Democrats to follow in her footsteps.

Look at you seeing how many trigger words you could fit it one tweet. Kudos. P.S. You were never a Democrat

— TWalsh (@hogan_1969) October 11, 2022

Tulsi Gabbard announcing she's not a Democrat is like Trump announcing he doesn't have a library card.

Yeah. We know.

— Charlotte Clymer 🏳️‍⚧️🇺🇦 (@cmclymer) October 11, 2022

Hallelujah! Putin ass-kisser Tulsi Gabbard is finally leaving the Democratic Party. With luck, she’ll move to Russia. Good riddance, traitor!!!

— Jon Cooper (@joncoopertweets) October 11, 2022

Tulsi Gabbard is a liar, a gaslighter, a propagandist, a failure, & a loser.

She’s a Russian asset who doesn’t belong in America, let alone in the Democratic Party.

Don’t let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya, you filthy traitor.

— The USA Singers (@TheUSASingers) October 11, 2022

Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian asset and a fucking treasonous dickhead.

— Mayo 🌻 (@MayoIsSpicyy) October 11, 2022

Hillary called Tulsi Gabbard a Russian Kompromat who Putin would run as a third party candidate to siphon votes

Gabbard asked why Americans should care if Russia intervened in our elections: "America does it too"

Bitch, to leave the Democratic Party you need to be in it first.

— flexghost. (@flexghost1) October 11, 2022

No one cares that Tulsi Gabbard is no longer a Democrat. Was she ever?

— Barbara Malmet (@B52Malmet) October 11, 2022

Tulsi Gabbard says she is leaving the Democratic Party. WTF! Tulsi was NEVER a member & only used it cuz her home state, Hawaii, is heavily Democratic & joined to get into Congress. Tulsi is a GOP Putin Fox “News” loving POS Traitor who needs to STFU! #morningjoe #theView

— Dan "I Stand With Ukraine" P (@ddanpereira) October 11, 2022

90% of all tweets from Democrats either say she’s a Putin asset, or that she was “never a real Democrat.” The other 10% say both.

“I believe in a government that is of the people, by the people and for the people. Unfortunately, today’s Democratic Party does not. Instead, it stands for a government that is of, by and for the powerful elite,” she continued. “I’m calling on my fellow common sense, independent-minded Democrats to join me in leaving the Democratic Party.”

Gabbard’s announcement served as the inaugural episode of “The Tusli Gabbard Show,” a podcast she is now running.

There could be some utility to this, but the conservatives are too stupid to make hay out of it.

The logical thing to do would be to point out that she still supports most of the Democrat issues, but is breaking because the party is psycho war-monger hate school.

Instead, these Fox News hosts have her on and say “speaking Republican talking points at me.”

The Sean Hannity show is like some kind of hypnotism. It’s just the same thing, over and over again, and he only brings on people who want to say the same thing to him that he’s been saying for decades.

In one of the only segments where I’ve ever seen him disagree with a guest,  he brought Tulsi on to harass her about being against war with Russia.

My question is: why does an Irish Catholic from New York love the Jews so much?

Kudos to Cher’s plastic surgeons. These people are geniuses. Maybe they should be put in charge of the Democrat Party.

Nancy, as stupid women are doing a lot these days, bet very big and lost very big.

So I bet she’s got that Rolling Stones’ song “Angie” playing in her head, with “Angie” being replaced with “Nancy.”

That’s where I’d be right now if I were her.

“We can’t say we never tried.”

Politico:

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and other top Democrats put a brave face on Wednesday morning after a disappointing loss in the Georgia special election, yet there is no disguising the unhappiness in the party ranks.

There is no challenge to Pelosi’s leadership, and none is going to happen at this point, said numerous Democrats. But it’s clear frustration is growing with the longtime Democratic leader following the extensive losses Democrats have suffered over the past half-decade.

And the fact that Republicans spent millions of dollars on TV ads tying Democratic hopeful Jon Ossoff to Pelosi — and the brand of progressive policies she represents — shows that she will once again be an issue for Democratic challengers in the very districts that the party needs to win to make her speaker again.

Yeah but where are they going to go other than Nancy Pelosi’s brand of progressivism?

The problem here is not even Nancy Pelosi. It is the agenda she represents, which to be fair, she is a very good representation of. A sort of archetypal form of it. In the same way that Jeb Bush was the archetypal form of the cuckservative.

I don’t think there is any way to salvage the Democrat party at this point, other than simply basing it entirely on unifying groups that hate Donald Trump, which is exactly what they are doing.

We have mocked the Democrats for refusing to logically confront quantified data, but on this point, they really are correct.

Some of their troubles include:

• Bernie Socialism can’t be sold to colored people.
• Mass non-white immigration can’t be sold to working class or otherwise at all normal whites, save for single white women.
• A white candidate can’t convince a large enough number of blacks to vote at all.
• Gays are becoming increasingly uncomfortable with mass Islamic immigration.
• Their economic programs are all insane globalist schemes hidden from the people by social welfare programs they pay for with debt, their funding depends on this, so they have to focus on bizarre social agendas exclusively.
• They have become inextricably tied to neoconservative-type interventionist war policy, their funding depends on this, and the only distraction from this is weird social agendas.

The biggest problem is that the weird social-engineering programs are themselves becoming so bizarre that even the people they are supposed to be benefiting are becoming disillusioned with them.

The point here is: Nancy Pelosi did nothing wrong, based on the current situation the Democrats are in. The only role they have the option of playing is of opposition party, held together by hatred for Trump, under the veneer of some type of great social transformation into a nation of transsexual Islamic mariachi hip-hop Pepsi street parties.

Some Democrats want to replace Pelosi atop their caucus, as they have since last November’s poor showing at the polls; they say there is no way to get back in the majority with her as their leader. And others who backed her in last year’s leadership challenge have now flipped their stance.

“I think you’d have to be an idiot to think we could win the House with Pelosi at the top,” said Rep. Filemon Vela (D-Texas), who supported Pelosi in her last leadership race. “Nancy Pelosi is not the only reason that Ossoff lost. But she certainly is one of the reasons.”

Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.), who backed a challenge to Pelosi last year, said the results of the Ossoff race further underscore that Pelosi should let someone else take the reins.

“There comes a time when every leader has to say, ‘For the good of the order and for the betterment of the party, it’s time for me to step aside.’ And I wish that that would happen right now,” Rice said in an interview. “This is not a personal thing. I want to get back in the majority.”

Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), who challenged Pelosi for minority leader in November, wouldn’t comment directly whether she should step down, saying only, “My position hasn’t changed.”

“I think it’s very concerning that that tactic still has some punch,” Ryan said. “Again, it’s part of the broader national brand that average people don’t feel connected to the Democratic Party. Walk up the street and ask 10 people what the Democrats stand for, you’ll get 10 different answers. That’s no way to build a national party.”

Yeah.

And yet, you don’t have a solution. No one has any solution. Combining globalist economics and mass-immigrationism with deranged social-engineering programs was always about “how to best Jew the goyim,” and it’s now reached the point where the whole thing is so absurd, no one can make any sense of it.

I have thought a lot about this. I think it is a very important skill and mental exercise for anyone concerned about politics to be able to put themselves in the position of the opposition. And there is nothing that can hold the Democrat party together, that would be a cohesive, logical agenda, because “always doing what is most harmful to white men” as policy has created too many internal contradictions.

The only real option is to switch out Pelosi for someone who is more charismatic and capable of delivering a nonsensical non-agenda as if it makes sense. Someone who is less of a physical embodiment of the the manic nature of the agenda itself.

If I were these people, I would be demanding Jon Stewart.

He’s not a politician, but that is not even a little bit relevant. There is no actual political skill involved here, given that there is no possibility of altering course as far as any policy or position.

Stewart (Liebowitz) is charismatic with extremely high verbal intelligence, and most importantly he is Jewish, so he is going to be 100% committed to this agenda without injecting some personal bias. Any of these blacks or actual true-believer progressives they’re looking at would have some form of personal bias that would eventually cause problems,

Pelosi told her members in a closed-door meeting on Wednesday morning that Ossoff was “a candidate who was young and enthusiastic, and attracted national support,” according to Democratic sources. Pelosi also pointed out that Ossoff lost by only a small margin in the 6th Congressional District race — 3.8 percent — far smaller than the previous Democratic candidate for the seat lost by in November.

Pelosi, though, admitted: “A loss is a loss. It is a setback. Unfortunately, a loss for us. But not good news” for Republicans. Pelosi also cautioned her members not to overreact to the results of this specific race.

Pelosi didn’t talk to members about the GOP ads focusing on her. No members brought up the issue of her leadership or said she should step aside.

Pelosi pointed out that Democrats won the special-election fights during the 2009-10 cycle, only to lose 63 seats in November 2010, while in 2005-06 — when Democrats won the House — they lost several special elections.

And Pelosi talked about how the recent shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) may have aided GOP candidate Karen Handel. Republican outside groups tried to tie that shooting to the frenzy of anti-Trump rhetoric among Democratic supporters, as the shooter posted strongly negative comments about President Donald Trump on his Facebook page.

“Republican voters don’t get to select the leaders of the Democratic Party,” said Drew Hammill, a spokesman for Pelosi. “Since [Newt] Gingrich, the politics of personal destruction has been a GOP hallmark. They will do this to any and every Democratic leader because the only thing sustaining their majority is desperation.”

Wow, that’s certainly some back-against-the-wall reasoning.

But there’s a sort of finesse to it.

The sort of finesse that allowed the Democrats to carry this insane agenda as far as they have, in fact.

Some Democrats said they left the meeting surprised and disheartened that the GOP’s Pelosi attack ads weren’t addressed in some way.

“It was probably one of the more disturbing caucus meetings that I’ve ever been in. And everyone pretty much sat in silence, and I’d like to think that they were as shocked as I was that they were hearing the spin that was being put on this loss,” Rice said.

With President Barack Obama out of office, Pelosi is once again the Democrat that Republicans most love to hate. She has been on the national scene for 14 years, and Republicans have long made the phrase “San Francisco values” a pejorative for any Democratic challenger.

And Democrats — despite the fervor among their base — are being forced to acknowledge that an anti-Trump message is not going to be enough by itself to win in 2018. Trump may have historically bad poll numbers for this point in his presidency, but Democrats are likely to need more than that to get back in the majority.

But is anyone, anywhere, putting forward a genuine, serious option to that?

Because I haven’t seen it. What I have seen is a bunch of totally unworkable reboot ideas that would necessarily alienate necessary parts of their coalition.

I mean, am I missing something here?

The only debate they can have is about Pelosi as a political personality. And they are probably right about that. But the media should stop pretending the debate is something more complicated than that.

It’s dishonest.

The media shouldn’t be dishonest.

SIDE NOTE

The Stones really were as good as they were made out to be. The Eagles though… not really so much.

“Take It Easy” was by far their best song, and that wasn’t even Henley’s.

I’m not even saying that someone somewhere is saying the Eagles were as good as the Stones, but as far as cultural influence – that is, songs that are constantly on in the background for peoples’ entire lives, to some extent, whether they like it or not – they are comparable.

And I’m just going to tell you this straight-up right now: every single single the Stones have ever released is better than “Hotel California.” I am stating that absolutely here, not as hyperbole.

Most rock music was really just “lol let’s give this to the goyim it will fuck them up badly roflmao.”

But Mick Jagger and Keith Richards were actual musical geniuses and deserved at least a quarter of the fame they were awarded on actual merit.

I mean, they wrote one of the top five all-time best country songs about heroin – and they were a rock band.

Townes Van Zandt said the biggest regret of his life was that he didn’t write that song. Or something like that he said, I don’t remember the exact quote.

And this guy knew a thing or two about heroin songs.

Shortly before Obama administration official and Clinton sycophant Tom Perez upset the DNC grassroots’ favorite Keith Ellison, the infamous Jewish lawyer Alan Dershowitz penned a vicious ultimatum.

Dershowitz is a medium level celebrity who donates medium level dollars to the Democratic party, yet seldom comments on its activities or policies. But in the case of Ellison, who often votes against giving away no-strings attached American tax-payer money to Israel, Dershowitz states plainly that his racial loyalty comes before his party.

My loyalty to my country and my principles and my heritage exceeds any loyalty to my party.  I will urge other like-minded people — centrist liberals — to follow my lead and quit the Democratic Party if Ellison is elected chairman.  We will not be leaving the Democratic Party we have long supported.  The Democratic Party will be leaving us!

In the context of the article, Dershowitz’s country is Israel, his heritage is Jewish, and his principles are his belief that the Jewish race is chosen to reign supreme over mankind. The last public disavowal by Dershowitz came in his cutting of ties with Black Lives Matter, not for their anti-white racism or calls for attacks on police, but because they weren’t sufficiently pro-Israel.

Why the vast majority of non-Jewish Democrats need to accomodate Dershowitz’s Zionism has no politically correct answers, but the top plutocrats in the Democratic party already responded long ago. After the Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Congress and billionaire donor Haim Saban grumbled about Ellison, Obama reached deep into his bench to unearth Tom Perez (on December 15th, two weeks after Jewish groups began complaining about the previously unopposed Ellison) to placate these Jewish oligarchs.

Barenaked Jewish Conspiracy

Most rank-and-file Democrats are still reeling from what transpired last Saturday. The barenaked triangulation between the Jewish donors (Saban), Jewish advocacy groups (ADL, AJC), and the Jewish mainstream media (most which uncritically published largely anonymous hearsay against Ellison) to block Ellison exposed the DNC activist wing and base as little more than an impotent charade meant to occasionally harass white people and Donald Trump.

Disgraced Interim chair Donna Brazile’s last minute announcement that the DNC chair vote would be made anonymous added more fuel to the fire. Using “spotty internet service” as an alibi, the party machine increased the opacity of the already questionable process. The real reason was to take accountability away from delegates who voted for Tom Perez. By hiding these individuals, the grassroots would not be able to attack them at the ballot box and their links to Jewish hedge fund billionaires would be kept a secret.

The Democrats present themselves as the party of the little guy, but in practice, they are even more corrupt and beholden to the Jewish oligarchs than the GOP. Trump was able to break through the barriers the GOP put in place, largely because the hardened Jewish core within Republican infrastructure was considerably weaker than what it is in the Democratic Party.

“Never Trump” and “Never Ellison”

The dying expression of Jewish hegemony over the Republican Party, “Never Trump,” was unable to consolidate enough power to defeat the President. Among the Democrats, they have succeeded in holding steadfast, but at what cost?

While the phenomenons are on two different sides of the street, “Never Ellison” and “Never Trump” follow similar trajectories. Both represent the “special interests” (read: Jews) against the interests of the public. For the DNC, the point of contention is whether Jews are entitled to an American bolstered state that practices ethnic genocide, racial eugenics and apartheid, which the majority of Democratic voters say ‘No.’

The Jewish wing of the RNC fought similarly as hard to keep perpetual war, limitless global capitalism, social safety net cuts, and open borders immigration as Republican party issues even though the white working class base hates all of these planks. But the neo-con Jews were weaker and Trump was stronger. They won’t allow anything similar to happen to the Democratic Party.

Bernie Sanders, the Jewish leader of the controlled opposition, continues to be a willing patsy, encouraging his angry supporters to stick with the party even as it continues to practice malfeasance like this.

Democrats Crash Into The Jewish Question

The most interesting development to come out of the successful (((“Never Ellison”))) campaign is that ordinary Democrats know exactly what just transpired, but will they have the integrity to say so?

Some liberals, including a fairly principled Jew (Glenn Greenwald), are already hinting at what they may be discussing behind closed doors. In an analysis on the day before the ballots were cast, Glenn Greenwald had no qualms in speaking candidly.

The Intercept:

But there’s an uglier and tawdrier aspect to this. Just over two weeks after Ellison announced, the largest single funder of both the Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign — the Israeli-American billionaire Haim Saban — launched an incredibly toxic attack on Ellison, designed to signal his veto. “He is clearly an anti-Semite and anti-Israel individual,” pronounced Saban about the African-American Muslim congressman, adding: “Keith Ellison would be a disaster for the relationship between the Jewish community and the Democratic Party.”

Saban has a long history not only of fanatical support for Israel — “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel,” he told the New York Times in 2004 about himself — but also an ugly track record of animus toward Muslims. As The Forward gently put it, he is prone to “a bit of anti-Muslim bigotry,” including when he said Muslims deserve “more scrutiny” and “also called for profiling and broader surveillance.” In 2014, he teamed up with right-wing billionaire Sheldon Adelson to push a pro-Israel agenda. In that notorious NYT profile, he attacked the ACLU for opposing Bush/Cheney civil liberties assaults and said: “On the issues of security and terrorism I am a total hawk.”

There’s no evidence that Saban’s attack on Ellison is what motivated the White House to recruit an opponent. But one would have to be indescribably naïve about the ways of Washington to believe that such a vicious denunciation by one of the party’s most influential billionaire funders had no effect at all.

…

As both Chang and Vox’s Jeff Stein have argued, the fact that DNC chair is a largely functionary position, with little real power over party policy or messaging, is all the more reason to throw Sanders supporters a symbolic bone. If Democrats were smart, this would be the perfect opportunity to capture that energized left-wing movement without having to make any real concessions on what matters most to them: loyalty to their corporate donor base.

I believe that the election of Perez over Ellison is the beginning of the end of the Democratic party, even though the DNC chairmanship has little power to begin with. Jews are looking to use anti-Trump animosity they manufacture in their press to hold this coalition of contradictions (blacks, Muslims, illegal Mexicans, transsexuals, socialists, and Jewish billionaires coordinating them) together, but this transparent power play may just be the catalyst for a split.

It’s safe to say that this rigged election, to quote Trump, will trigger a gradual walk-out that the Zion-Press will try and cover up. The true nature of this split will be seen in 2018 and 2020. A corrupt and incompetent party administered entirely by black women and controlled with an iron fist by Jews can only go so far in pushing the patience of white people (even diehard liberals).

With one stroke of a pen, President Trump pulled the United States out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and brought entitled global capitalist traitors who basically uniformly opposed him down a tick. Few people even know what was in the thousands of pages negotiated in secret, but know that economic incontinence always destroys the working and middle class (not just in America, but even in the poorer countries). The United States cannot compete with Mexican and Chinese labor costs unless it becomes Mexico or China, which is another project Jews and capitalists have been working on but haven’t accomplished yet.

A more subtle note during this event was Trump’s meeting with a number of labor unions who had previously given their support to Hillary Clinton, largely out of habit.

Reuters:

President Donald Trump met Monday at the White House with leaders of construction, carpenters, plumbers and sheet metal unions, the White House said.

According to the White House, participants included North America’s Building Trades Unions President Sean McGarvey, Laborers’ International Union of North America President Terry O’Sullivan, SMART sheet metal workers’ union President Joseph Sellers, United Brotherhood of Carpenters President Doug McCarron and Mark McManus, president of the United Association that represents plumbers, pipefitters, welders and others.

The union meeting also included several local union officials and follows a gathering of 12 chief executives of large companies at the White House to discuss revitalizing the U.S. manufacturing economy.

Earlier this month, Trump held separate meetings with Teamsters President Jim Hoffa and AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka in New York.

On Monday, Trump signed an order to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, a deal that was harshly criticized by organized labor. “This is a group I know well,” Trump said at the meeting with union members, noting as a businessman he hired thousands of union workers for construction projects.

Labor unions are often given a hard time by National Review pipeline cuckolds in DC think-tanks, but Trump reaching out to them could be the beginning of a massive rift that will make it impossible for the Democratic Party to win another election for the foreseeable future.

There is no real reason for white working men to support the Democratic party, but thanks to Ronald Reagan’s failed libertarian and open borders policies, American labor was pushed into the hands of the Democrats and have delivered them numerous elections in the Midwest since then. Until the Reagan years, American labor had been at the forefront of anti-immigration lobbying and the fight for the middle class, even in the cases of rare honest Jews like Samuel Gompers and Mexicans like Cesar Chavez.

AYO Ronny – don’t let dat boi in here…!

By winning over organized labor unions that aren’t controlled by Jews or Cultural Marxist fags, Trump is able to attack the Left from the Left and aggressively expand the GOP base. Additionally, blue collar construction workers employed by these unions won’t have to deal with the awkwardness of attending Democratic Party events and being the only heterosexual white male in the room.

Most of these union men actually dislike most of the agenda the Democratic Party has in store for them (like, killing them and replacing them with minimum wage Guatemalans) – and yet, at demonstrations, these were the guys scrawny Jews and blue haired feminists in taped up glasses depended on to do all the fighting. Don’t expect to see them at the next public hipster temper tantrum.

Definitely Not In the Sheetmetal Workers Union

Trump’s national economic revolution, which vows to tap the same working men who built once-amazing metropolis’ like Detroit and Cincinnati to rebuild them again, could be a dramatic success – as long as he makes good on his promise to domesticate the wild animals that have destroyed the aforementioned cities.

On his first day in office, Trump has already done more for the American people and the Republican Party than the last several presidents.

You’d think from listening to “pundits” like (((Charles Krauthammer))) (why is he on every show commenting about everything?) that politics was some mystique-laden and impossible task where everything moves at a snail’s pace.

The mysterious political mystery realm of Charles Krauthammer: Goyim need not apply to try and understand what he’s talking about.

Trump has broken the political system and it is now realigning as I have always predicted it would: populist economic policy combined with nationalism. Trump is only the start, but thanks to his work in redesigning the political landscape and Wrong-Wing orthodoxy, our groups can now hit the ground running.

“Muffugguh I done told ya twicet. Ah aint be botta tell yall niggas tricet. Nah. Cuz ima botta keel all yall muffugguhs.” -Keith Ellison on his new plans for reform and innovation projects in communities

So.

The Democratic party is finally on its way to ethnically cleansing itself of white people – they are nearing victory in electing a colored gentleman to run it.

Keith Ellison will create a Democratic alliance for and of black Negroes from Africa.

There is just one thing standing in his way: an army of Jewish maniacs.

The Hill:

The Anti-Defamation League on Thursday voiced its opposition to Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison’s bid to run the Democratic Party, citing “deeply disturbing and disqualifying” past statements about Israel.

Pointing to a resurfaced 2010 speech, the CEO of the Jewish civil rights group, Jonathan Greenblatt, questioned whether “Ellison faithfully could represent the Democratic Party’s traditional support for a strong and secure Israel.”

Ha-ha…!

Yes, this is going to be very interesting, isn’t it, Jews?

Trying to get a coalition of welfare-gobbling niggle-noggles to care about your desert gang base.

I can’t wait to see how that turns out!

In that speech, Ellison asked why “United States’ foreign policy in the Middle East is governed by what is good or bad through a country of 7 million people.”

“A region of 350 million all turns on a country of 7 million. Does that make sense? Is that logic? Right?” Ellison said at the time, according to reports cited by the League.

The League’s statement deals a blow to Ellison’s bid to lead the Democratic National Committee. So far, he has emerged as the frontrunner with a large slate of endorsements from across the political spectrum, including incoming Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) and populist darling and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Greenblatt’s statement goes on to accuse Ellison, “whether intentional or not” of raising “the specter of age-old stereotypes about Jewish control of our government.”

He offered no counter-explanation of why all American foreign policy is based on protecting the interests of Israel, or why our government is literally run by Jews, however.

The statement was released just hours after a new report by CNN on Thursday detailed Ellison’s defense of Louis Farrakhan, the Nation of Islam leader who has made anti-Semitic comments in the past.

Ellison responded in an open letter to Greenblatt and the ADL.

In the letter, Ellison called himself “a strong supporter of the Jewish state, voting for more than $27 billion in aid to Israel” and adding he’s committed to the safety and security of the Jewish State.

“I wish we could have spoken once again before your most recent statement. If given the opportunity, I could have provided a full and proper explanation,” Ellison wrote, adding that he is “saddened” by the ADL’s statement but looks forward to working with them.

His letter argues that the audio was “was selectively edited and taken out of context by an individual the Southern Poverty Law Center has called an “anti-Muslim extremist.'”

“My memory is that I was responding to a question about how Americans with roots in the Middle East could engage in the political process in a more effective way. My advice was simply to get involved,” he said.

Ellison is a Mulatto Moslem convert.

And he’s about to become the head of the Democratic party.

Wow.

This is looking like it’s about to get sticky!

Blood thirsty Jewish Neo-Con (redundant) and (((Never Trump))) activist Max Boot has written yet another article comparing Donald Trump to Hitler.  This time, he is bouncing the Hitler analogy off the recent Democratic party paramilitary bombing of an Orange County, North Carolina Trump campaign office, where instead of condemning the terrorist attack, he chides Donald Trump for condemning it.

The op-ed  is a glimpse into the demented mind of a Jew, and why no conservative will ever be able to keep up with these genetic bandits (Trump is not a conservative in the American cuckold sense). The first lesson to take from Boot is that Jews only respect the rule of law and democracy when they have a total grasp on it, once this begins to slip towards a more even share of power where the best ideas win, Jews will use their official positions and clout to support illegal activities that further their goals.

The second lesson is that Jews have no moral scruples about lying, killing or terrorizing political opposition if they see it fit – Jews are secretly cheering for the people who bombed the office, even if they have to say it in between the lines when they write for the general public.

The third lesson is that they are always on the attack, to the point that even when the Republican party of Trump is being subjected to political violence that has he will still blame people he perceives as having no right to a different opinion for it.

In the Los Angeles Times, he wrote “The Nazi Echoes In Trump’s Tweets”:

It goes without saying that Donald Trump is no Hitler — there is only one Hitler — and the firebombing of a Trump campaign office in Orange County, N.C., Saturday night was no Reichstag fire. But nevertheless there were some disturbing echoes of 1933 in Trump’s immediate response. He tweeted: “Animals representing Hillary Clinton and Dems in North Carolina just firebombed our office in Orange County because we are winning.”

There is so much wrong with that sentence it’s hard to know where to begin. In the first place Trump is not winning North Carolina — the Realclearpolitics average of polls has him down by 2.9 points. Second, you don’t refer to anyone — even arsonists — as “animals”; however deeply flawed, even criminal, they remain human beings. Third, and most importantly, there is no evidence to suggest that the arsonists were “representing” Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party.

Even if the attack was the work of local Democrats, it’s impossible to imagine that Clinton or the Democratic Party had anything to do with it. It’s just as likely to be a false-flag operation carried out by Trump’s alt-right supporters to implicate the Democrats. But Clinton rightly did not make any such allegation. All her Twitter feed said was: “The attack on the Orange County HQ ‪@NCGOP office is horrific and unacceptable. Very grateful that everyone is safe.”

This is a textbook example of the two-tiered dichotomy of the “official” press. Donald Trump is Hitler because he called the terrorists “animals,” meanwhile those who use violence to stifle an opinion they don’t like are the real mensches. While being indirect, Boot is also throwing out there that the bombing was a false flag by the Alt-Right (!), a line you should expect to gain traction if Jews are able to focus group it with any success.

While we know Hitler was the good guy, many others are indoctrinated against him, and constantly posed with the pestering, perturbed Hebrew-to-goy infanticide hypothesis: “Would you kill baby Hitler?”

The comparison of Trump to Hitler – and it’s no coincidence that it has been recklessly trotted out against other men Jews have ordered hits on (Saddam, Milosevic, Qaddaffi) – is meant to be inflammatory, it’s a thinly veiled green light to readers to commit acts of violence, even murder.  In modern Judeo-Merica, you can dress up as Satan, Bin Laden or Ted Bundy, but you will often run into trouble if you dress up as Hitler for Halloween – Hitler is worse than evil, though even this is dissipating as the methods and institutions who suppress the politically incorrect begin to wither away brick by brick .

Yet still, reading through Boot’s entire article, you will find not one condemnation of the actual act of bombing an opposing political party’s office, not even as an obligatory preface. The problem, Goyim, is you complaining about it.

Yet, all they’re doing with the Hitler analogy is showing people why Hitler said and did what he had to do. For the first time, with Trump, they might not be wrong in comparing him to Hitler: the masses are realizing they both stood for what’s right, and this is an epiphany the Judeo-Globalists will not be able to throw money at or swat down this time.

The clock is ticking…

Editor’s Note: I’ll just leave this here.

@MaxBoot

So, we now have Hillary’s entire anti-Trump strategy document.

The claim is that this document was recovered by Russian hackers. I don’t know if that’s true. I of course hope it is, as I like to think our Russian friends are trying to help us out.

The hacker called himself Guccifier 2.0, a reference to the now-jailed Romanian hacker who was the first to make Hillary’s illegal private server public. He released a statement saying he did this to stop the illuminati.

This is going to be a gigantic blow to Hillary.

Trump is going to go nuts with all of this stuff.

If you’re starting to feel bad for Hillary at this point, I can understand you.

But just remember this:

Don’t feel bad for Hillary.

Here’s the pdf.

This is incredible.

We are literally attacked for suggesting our lives matter.

During a “Netroots Nation” conference on Saturday, Democratic presidential candidate Martin O’Malley was booed on stage for saying “all lives matter.”

The interview was hosted by that illegal Filipino troll thing who made the MTV video attacking Whites, I can’t think of his name. Maybe it’s Jose Sanchez.

Breitbart:

During his town hall discussion, [relevant portion begins around 19:30] protesters stood up and began singing “What side are you on?” While the protesters were singing, moderator Jose Antonio Vargas let an activist onstage to ask O’Malley a question. The then activist made a long statement, before people in the crowd read off the names of black women who died in police custody and did multiple “If I die in police custody” chants and “Black lives matter” chants.

At 36:25 into the video, O’Malley was finally able to answer a question about what he would do about police misconduct. After O’Malley said, [relevant remarks around 39:20] “Every life matters. And that is why this issue is so important. Black lives matter, white lives matter, all lives matter,” the crowd booed and shouted at him.

Having realized that he’d said something someone didn’t like, he did the only honorable thing and immediately apologized for suggesting his life, or the lives of any non-Black, matters.

You can see this at about 41 minutes in this video:

What a complete scumbag. Who could possibly support this kind of weakness in a leader? What do these people think, making their immediate apologies? Do they really expect people to believe “yeah, after I said that, I immediately changed my belief on the matter when I heard people were against it”? And then do they think if people do believe that, they will hold any bit of respect for them?

You know who doesn’t say sorry?

The Donald.