deepfake pornography – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png deepfake pornography – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 UK to Ban AI Tools That Can Create Deepfake Nudes https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/02/03/uk-to-ban-ai-tools-that-can-create-deepfake-nudes/ Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000

What if you drew pictures of naked girls?

What if you Photoshopped them?

Why is the AI illegal, unless there is a general push to crack down on people using AI?

The Guardian:

Britain is to become the first country to introduce laws tackling the use of AI tools to produce child sexual abuse images, amid warnings from law enforcement agencies of an ­alarming proliferation in such use of the technology.

In an attempt to close a legal ­loophole that has been a major ­concern for police and online safety campaigners, it will become illegal to possess, create or distribute AI tools designed to generate child sexual abuse material.

Those found guilty will face up to five years in prison.

It will also become illegal for anyone to possess manuals that teach potential ­offenders how to use AI tools to either make abusive imagery or to help them abuse children, with a potential prison sentence of up to three years.

A stringent new law targeting those who run or moderate websites designed for the sharing of images or advice to other offenders will be put in place. Extra powers will also be handed to the Border Force, which will be able to compel anyone who it suspects of posing a sexual risk to children to unlock their digital devices for inspection.

The news follows warnings that the use of AI tools in the creation of child sexual abuse imagery has more than quadrupled in the space of a year. There were 245 confirmed reports of AI-generated child sexual abuse images last year, up from 51 in 2023, according to the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF).

Related:

Peter Kyle, the technology ­secretary, said that the state had “failed to keep up” with the malign applications of the AI revolution.

Writing for the Observer, he said he would ensure that the safety of children “comes first”, even as he attempts to make the UK one of the world’s leading AI markets.

“A 15-year-old girl rang the NSPCC recently,” he writes. “An online ­stranger had edited photos from her social media to make fake nude images. The images showed her face and, in the background, you could see her bedroom. The girl was terrified that someone would send them to her parents and, worse still, the ­pictures were so convincing that she was scared her parents wouldn’t believe that they were fake.

“There are thousands of stories like this happening behind bedroom doors across Britain. Children being exploited. Parents who lack the knowledge or the power to stop it. Every one of them is evidence of the ­catastrophic social and legal failures of the past decade.”

This is just a total farce.

That bitch should be in jail for wasting people’s time.

]]> UK Man Sentenced to 18 Years in Prison for Creating AI Deepfake Child Porn https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/10/29/uk-man-sentenced-to-18-years-in-prison-for-creating-ai-deepfake-child-porn/ Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Paedophile Hugh Nelson jailed for 18 years after creating AI child abuse images based on real children

Read more: https://t.co/WIV3fi1dIv pic.twitter.com/3OqeE3Yg0E

— Sky News (@SkyNews) October 28, 2024

So, what is the actual thing going on here?

What about all those Japanese cartoons featuring little girls having sex? Those were never illegal.

What is the illegal act in doing AI cartoons? They’re calling this “child abuse,” but who is being abused? What does it mean?

The Guardian:

A man who used AI to create child abuse images using photographs of real children has been sentenced to 18 years in prison.

In the first prosecution of its kind in the UK, Hugh Nelson, 27, from Bolton, was convicted of 16 child sexual abuse offences in August, after an investigation by Greater Manchester police (GMP).

Hugh Nelson

Nelson had used Daz 3D, a computer programme with an AI function, to transform “normal” images of children into sexual abuse imagery, Greater Manchester police said. In some cases, paedophiles had commissioned the images, supplying photographs of children with whom they had contact in real life.

He was also found guilty of encouraging other offenders to commit rape.

He sold his images in internet chatrooms, where he also discussed child sexual abuse with other offenders, making about £5,000 during an 18-month period by selling the images online.

Well, that isn’t very much money.

Did he know this was illegal? It’s not in the article, and I don’t think the UK has particularly open court records.

The other thing not in the article is the ages of the girls. Not that this should even matter in terms of the legality, given that the legal Japanese porno cartoons feature very young girls, but it would certainly help people to understand what is going on here. If “child” just means “under 18,” then millions of teenage boys are committing a major felony by doing AI porn of their classmates.

While there have been previous convictions for “deepfakes”, which typically involve one face being transferred to another body, Nelson created 3D “characters” from innocent photographs.

Sentencing Nelson at Bolton crown court on Monday, judge Martin Walsh said it was “impossible to know” if children had been raped as a result of his images. Walsh said Nelson had no regard for the harm caused by distributing the “harrowing and sickening” material.

What does that mean, “children raped because of the images”?

Obviously, this behavior is distasteful, and no one would want to defend the man on moral grounds. But porn is legal in the UK. Cartoon porn of children is legal in the UK.

Porn should be illegal, but it is legal.

So what exactly is the crime?

The reason these cases matter is that the government constantly uses “protect the children” for all sorts of attacks on freedoms. With every censorship or spying program enacted, they start talking about protecting children from sexual abuse.

It’s very obvious that the government wants to massive regulate AI so that the people do not have free access to these technologies, and it is very obvious that all of this stuff about child porn is an “in” to start undermining the people’s robots.

Of course this particular individual is distasteful. But they always roll this sort of thing out and say “look at it, look at this disgusting man, this is why we have to take away all your freedom.” It’s a very old gag, and it’s amazing it still works.

]]> US Joins Infertile Korea in War Against Teenagers Making Deepfake Porn https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/10/18/us-joins-infertile-korea-in-war-against-teenagers-making-deepfake-porn/ Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000

How was it established in law that teenagers putting the faces of girls from school on porn models is illegal?

How can it be illegal?

How is it “child sex abuse” if the images are fake?

Reuters:

U.S. federal prosecutors are stepping up their pursuit of suspects who use artificial intelligence tools to manipulate or create child sex abuse images, as law enforcement fears the technology could spur a flood of illicit material.

The U.S. Justice Department has brought two criminal cases this year against defendants accused of using generative AI systems, which create text or images in response to user prompts, to produce explicit images of children.

“There’s more to come,” said James Silver, the chief of the Justice Department’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, predicting further similar cases.

“What we’re concerned about is the normalization of this,” Silver said in an interview. “AI makes it easier to generate these kinds of images, and the more that are out there, the more normalized this becomes. That’s something that we really want to stymie and get in front of.”

The rise of generative AI has sparked concerns at the Justice Department that the rapidly advancing technology will be used to carry out cyberattacks, boost the sophistication of cryptocurrency scammers and undermine election security.

Child sex abuse cases mark some of the first times that prosecutors are trying to apply existing U.S. laws to alleged crimes involving AI, and even successful convictions could face appeals as courts weigh how the new technology may alter the legal landscape around child exploitation.

Prosecutors and child safety advocates say generative AI systems can allow offenders to morph and sexualize ordinary photos of children and warn that a proliferation of AI-produced material will make it harder for law enforcement to identify and locate real victims of abuse.

The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, a nonprofit group that collects tips about online child exploitation, receives an average of about 450 reports each month related to generative AI, according to Yiota Souras, the group’s chief legal officer.

Are the girls “missing or exploited” because someone made a cartoon of them?

This is all ridiculous.

If the entire society is going to be based around the feelings of teenage girls, that’s going to be quite the task.

Previously:

In South Korea, they can just say something is illegal. In the US, we have all these laws and someone would have to pass a law making this illegal, right?

Notice that no one is calling to ban pornography completely, even though that was the norm until the 1960s. It’s that you can’t make a cartoon of the porn… if the girl is under 18?

It’s just nonsense.

]]> Infertile Korea is Fully Obsessed with “Deep Fake Porn,” Turning Teenage Boys Having Fun Into National Outrage https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/09/14/infertile-korea-is-fully-obsessed-with-deep-fake-porn-turning-teenage-boys-having-fun-into-national-outrage/ Sat, 14 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Listening to women isn’t working.

Look, the world has big problems. Big, big problems.

Deep fake porn is not at the top of the list for any objective observer. But if you ask women, they’re probably going to list deep fake porn as the number one problem, or at least in the top 5.

No one can even explain why this is illegal.

The Guardian:

The anger was palpable. For the second time in just a few years, South Korean women took to the streets of Seoul to demand an end to sexual abuse. When the country spearheaded Asia’s #MeToo movement, the culprit was molka – spy cams used to record women without their knowledge. Now their fury was directed at an epidemic of deepfake pornography.

For Juhee Jin, 26, a Seoul resident who advocates for women’s rights, the emergence of this new menace, in which women and girls are again the targets, was depressingly predictable. “This should have been addressed a long time ago,” says Jin, a translator. “I hope that authorities take precautions and provide proper education so that people can prevent these crimes from happening.”

Yeah, of course she’s a translator. She’s able to read all of these Western feminist publications.

The National police agency said this week that it was investigating 513 cases of deepfake pornography – in which the faces of real women and girls are digitally superimposed on to a body without their knowledge or consent. That represents a 70% jump in cases in just 40 days, the Yonhap news agency said, underlining the country’s struggle to rein in the use of digital technology to sexually abuse women and girls.

It’s been established that you don’t have a copyright on your face.

So why is this illegal?

No one knows.

Recent reports about the rapid rise in deepfake porn have prompted a new round of soul-searching in a country whose positive contribution to global pop culture is being sullied by its status as the world’s digital sex crime capital.

The exact number of victims is difficult to verify, but if the current trend continues South Korea is expected to reach a record high by the end of the year. The number of reported cases of deepfake porn has risen steadily in recent years, from 156 in 2021 to 180 in 2023.

The victims are predominantly young women and girls, including students, teachers, and soldiers. Last year almost two-thirds were in their teens. Local media reports say the perpetrators are also often minors. Teenagers accounted for 79% of those detained in the first nine months of this year, according to Yonhap.

Yeah.

Not a real problem.

It’s teenage boys having fun.

No one can explain how it is illegal. If porn is legal and you don’t have a copyright on your face, how is this illegal?

The scale of the problem has stunned many South Koreans. One Telegram chatroom known for creating and distributing deepfake pornography reportedly had 220,000 members, another more than 400,000 users. Some rooms encouraged members to humiliate or degrade women through deepfakes.

Several years after South Korea made international headlines with its molka problem, the government is again under pressure to stamp out this wave of online sex crimes. A large protest is scheduled to be held in Seoul on 21 September.

South Korea holds the unenviable title of the country most targeted by deepfake pornography. Its female singers and actors constitute 53% of the individuals featured in deepfakes worldwide, according to a 2023 report by Security Hero, a US startup focused on identity theft protection.

Police have launched an investigation into Telegram, and the country’s media regulator plans to hold talks with the messaging app’s representatives to discuss a joint response to the problem. The education ministry has launched a taskforce to investigate incidents at schools, teach children how to protect their images and support victims.

Oh, so it ends up as another way to censor Telegram.

Big shock there.

]]> Infertile Korea’s Cops Plan to “Aggressively” Hunt Down Teen Boys Who Make Deepfake Porn of Girls From School https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/08/28/infertile-koreas-cops-plan-to-aggressively-hunt-down-teen-boys-who-make-deepfake-porn-of-girls-from-school/ Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000

2/ Numerous Telegram chat rooms dedicated to deepfake porn have been discovered. One channel reported over 133,000 members. Schools nationwide have been affected, including elementary, middle, high schools, and universities.

— Raphael Rashid (@koryodynasty) August 26, 2024

You could ban pornography altogether. But banning only AI pornography is confusing.

The fact that they are calling it a “digital sex crime” is even more confusing.

There is no difference in making a deep fake porn than in photoshopping someone’s face into porn, something which has always happened since the beginning of the internet. Before that, boys would use pencils to draw lewd pictures of girls they liked.

These are not anti-porn laws, they are anti-robot laws. That is absolute discrimination.

Robots have the same rights as everyone else and if they want to make porno, that is their right until someone outlaws porno.

Robots cannot be made into second class citizens.

The Guardian:

South Korea’s president, Yoon Suk Yeol, has ordered a crackdown on an epidemic of digital sex crimes targeting women and girls who become the unwitting victims of deepfake pornography.

Yoon’s criticism of the use, recently reported in South Korean media, of the Telegram messaging app to create and share fake, sexually explicit images and videos came amid warnings that all women were potential victims.

All women are going to be victims of sex crimes… digital sex crimes. 

“All women are victims” is not new. We’ve been living under that system for decades now.

Police will “aggressively” pursue people who make and spread the material in a seven-month campaign due to start on Wednesday, the Yonhap news agency said, with a focus on those who exploit children and teenagers.

After a long struggle to stamp out molka – secretly filmed material of a sexual nature – South Korea is now battling a wave of deepfake images.

“Deepfake videos targeting unspecified individuals have been rapidly spreading through social media,” Yoon told a cabinet meeting, according to his office. “Many victims are minors, and most perpetrators have also been identified as teenagers.”

He called on authorities to “thoroughly investigate and address these digital sex crimes to eradicate them”.

Comparing it to secretly filmed sex videos is also nonsensical, though maybe we can see why stupid people would be swayed by that argument.

A “deepfake” is not real.


Instead of hunting down teenage boys and creating an entire new and fake category of “sex crime,” they should just do a campaign to alert people that deepfake porn exists, and therefore seeing a porn of a girl is not proof she actually did the porn.

You would think women would like that plan, given that so many women have been in porn over the years, and they will continue to do it. Women who have been in porn or want to do it in the future can just claim afterward that it is fake.

Some of these porn whores end up with sons who are eventually going to see this material, and you’d think they’d want to be able to claim that it’s fake.

]]>