deepfake nudes – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png deepfake nudes – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 UK to Ban AI Tools That Can Create Deepfake Nudes https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/02/03/uk-to-ban-ai-tools-that-can-create-deepfake-nudes/ Mon, 03 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000

What if you drew pictures of naked girls?

What if you Photoshopped them?

Why is the AI illegal, unless there is a general push to crack down on people using AI?

The Guardian:

Britain is to become the first country to introduce laws tackling the use of AI tools to produce child sexual abuse images, amid warnings from law enforcement agencies of an ­alarming proliferation in such use of the technology.

In an attempt to close a legal ­loophole that has been a major ­concern for police and online safety campaigners, it will become illegal to possess, create or distribute AI tools designed to generate child sexual abuse material.

Those found guilty will face up to five years in prison.

It will also become illegal for anyone to possess manuals that teach potential ­offenders how to use AI tools to either make abusive imagery or to help them abuse children, with a potential prison sentence of up to three years.

A stringent new law targeting those who run or moderate websites designed for the sharing of images or advice to other offenders will be put in place. Extra powers will also be handed to the Border Force, which will be able to compel anyone who it suspects of posing a sexual risk to children to unlock their digital devices for inspection.

The news follows warnings that the use of AI tools in the creation of child sexual abuse imagery has more than quadrupled in the space of a year. There were 245 confirmed reports of AI-generated child sexual abuse images last year, up from 51 in 2023, according to the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF).

Related:

Peter Kyle, the technology ­secretary, said that the state had “failed to keep up” with the malign applications of the AI revolution.

Writing for the Observer, he said he would ensure that the safety of children “comes first”, even as he attempts to make the UK one of the world’s leading AI markets.

“A 15-year-old girl rang the NSPCC recently,” he writes. “An online ­stranger had edited photos from her social media to make fake nude images. The images showed her face and, in the background, you could see her bedroom. The girl was terrified that someone would send them to her parents and, worse still, the ­pictures were so convincing that she was scared her parents wouldn’t believe that they were fake.

“There are thousands of stories like this happening behind bedroom doors across Britain. Children being exploited. Parents who lack the knowledge or the power to stop it. Every one of them is evidence of the ­catastrophic social and legal failures of the past decade.”

This is just a total farce.

That bitch should be in jail for wasting people’s time.

]]> Pennsylvania: School Cancels Classes After Horny Teenage Boys Terrorize Girls AI https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/11/20/pennsylvania-school-cancels-classes-after-horny-teenage-boys-terrorize-girls-ai/ Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000

BREAKING: Pennsylvania school cancels classes after nude AI photos of over 50 girls, including the principal, were spread around campus. pic.twitter.com/GEx87xVuyj

— Resist the Mainstream (@ResisttheMS) November 18, 2024

The Americans want to pass some kind of British-style law that makes it a crime of some sort to do deepfake nudes.

It’s not clear how this would be pushed under American law. It doesn’t really make any sense. In the UK, they can just make shit up, but in America, there remains a kind of framework for what is legal, and a cartoon picture cannot be illegal (unless of course the government outlawed obscenity again, which they’re not going to do because it’s a feminist country).

AP:

Images that depict the faces of girls with nude bodies have led to the departure of leaders from a private school in Pennsylvania, prompted a student protest and triggered a criminal investigation.

A juvenile suspect was “removed from” Lancaster Country Day School and his cellphone was seized by investigators in August, Susquehanna Regional Police Department Detective Laurel Bair said Tuesday.

It’s the latest example of how the use of artificial intelligence to create or manipulate images with sexual content has become a concern, including within school settings.

U.S. law enforcement has been cracking down on graphic depictions of computer-generated children as well as manipulated photos of real ones. The Justice Department says it’s pursuing those who exploit AI tools and states are racing to enact laws to address the problem.

How is the Justice Department cracking down? What is the law?

They are trying to make laws, but how can they make these laws? What is the core legal argument here? These are not real images, so it’s not “child porn” anymore than those Japanese loli cartoons.

What is the basic argument being made here?

A new Pennsylvania state law that takes effect late next month explicitly criminalizes making or disseminating AI-generated child sexual abuse material.

Abuse!

Who is being abused???

It’s a cartoon!

And police in South Korea are on a seven-month push to combat explicit deepfake content, with tougher penalties, expanded use of undercover officers and increased regulation of social media. Concerns in South Korea deepened after unconfirmed lists of schools with victims spread earlier this year.

Yes. Korea is implementing a total police state with secret police everywhere to stop teenage girls from being mad about cartoons created by horny teenage boys.

As part of the police investigation into what the Lancaster Country Day School describes as “disturbing AI generated photographs,” a search warrant was used this summer to obtain an iPhone 11 linked to a 15-year-old, according to court records. The records do not identify the teen.

A woman told police that her daughter said a fellow student had been “taking photographs of students and using Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology to portray the female juvenile students as being nude,” according to a probable cause affidavit used to apply for the search warrant.

Wouldn’t it be easier to teach girls not to be upset by these images? Why are they even upset? This should be an opportunity for women. In the future, if they get caught doing real porn, they can just say it’s AI. It creates a free pass for women to do porn.

Basically, this is the same thing as when the Jews say “we need to crack down on child porn and hate speech.” Everyone seems to understand what they’re doing there: they’re claiming that criticism of the Jews needs to be equated to child porn.

In making this huge fiasco over AI porn – which really does not matter at all – they are getting an “in” to undermine the public’s ability to freely use AI.

Governments have figured out that the open source AI is going to be at least as good as the closed source censored garbage, so they want to get an ability to restrict its use, and the best way to do that is to create laws to “protect the children.”

People call me a pervert for saying it’s not a big deal if people are doing deepfake porn of underage girls. I don’t really know how to respond to that other than: “Shut the fuck up you whining, emotional little baby. You fucking faggot moralfag, shut up. You are so gay, your stupid child emotions make me sick, you coward.”

I’m not defending “child porn.” Deepfakes are not child porn anymore than someone getting killed in a movie is “murder.” It’s not real porn. The entire opposition to child porn was that the girls were being abused, and no one is being abused if someone makes a cartoon of them. Teenagers have been drawing nude pictures of their classmates since the invention of pencils, and they’ve been using photoshop for decades.

I don’t support any porn. I have consistently lobbied for a reintroduction of obscenity laws in America and elsewhere. I think it should all be banned. So don’t tell me I’m defending it. I’m just telling you, this is not about protecting the emotions of teenage girls. If you believe that, you are literally a retarded baby. This is about restricting the use of AI, because the last thing the government wants is for the peasantry to have full access to the AI tools that the government and corporations are planning to use against us.

Seriously, bro. Get it together. Control your faggot womanly emotions. It’s fucking disgusting, watching you whine.

]]> Infertile Korea: Teenage Boys Ruining the Life of Fragile Women With Deepfake Porn https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/10/03/infertile-korea-teenage-boys-ruining-the-life-of-fragile-women-with-deepfake-porn/ Thu, 03 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000

“Deep fake porn” being a crime when porn itself is legal is confusing beyond what is even reasonable.

What is the crime? Specifically? What does this even mean?

Women are entitled whores and they deserve a lot worse.

AP:

Three years after the 30-year-old South Korean woman received a barrage of online fake images that depicted her nude, she is still being treated for trauma. She struggles to talk with men. Using a mobile phone brings back the nightmare.

“It completely trampled me, even though it wasn’t a direct physical attack on my body,” she said in a phone interview with The Associated Press. She didn’t want her name revealed because of privacy concerns.

Many other South Korean women recently have come forward to share similar stories as South Korea grapples with a deluge of non-consensual, explicit deepfake videos and images that have become much more accessible and easier to create.

It was not until last week that parliament revised a law to make watching or possessing deepfake porn content illegal.

Most suspected perpetrators in South Korea are teenage boys. Observers say the boys target female friends, relatives and acquaintances — also mostly minors — as a prank, out of curiosity or misogyny. The attacks raise serious questions about school programs but also threaten to worsen an already troubled divide between men and women.

Deepfake porn in South Korea gained attention after unconfirmed lists of schools that had victims spread online in August. Many girls and women have hastily removed photos and videos from their Instagram, Facebook and other social media accounts. Thousands of young women have staged protests demanding stronger steps against deepfake porn. Politicians, academics and activists have held forums.

“Teenage (girls) must be feeling uneasy about whether their male classmates are okay. Their mutual trust has been completely shattered,” said Shin Kyung-ah, a sociology professor at South Korea’s Hallym University.

The school lists have not been formally verified, but officials including President Yoon Suk Yeol have confirmed a surge of explicit deepfake content on social media. Police have launched a seven-month crackdown.

Recent attention to the problem has coincided with France’s arrest in August of Pavel Durov, the founder of the messaging app Telegram, over allegations that his platform was used for illicit activities including the distribution of child sexual abuse. South Korea’s telecommunications and broadcast watchdog said Monday that Telegram has pledged to enforce a zero-tolerance policy on illegal deepfake content.

Police say they’ve detained 387 people over alleged deepfake crimes this year, more than 80% of them teenagers. Separately, the Education Ministry says about 800 students have informed authorities about intimate deepfake content involving them this year.

Experts say the true scale of deepfake porn in the country is far bigger.

“I feel scared of living as a woman in South Korea,” said Kim Haeun, a 17-year-old high school student who recently removed all her photos on Instagram. She said she feels awkward when talking with male friends and tries to distance herself from boys she doesn’t know well.

“Most sex crimes target women. And when they happen, I think we are often helpless,” she said.

You could make porn illegal. Then you could prosecute boys for any porn. But feminists would never do that, because porn represses male sexuality.

So right now, with these rules against “deepfake porn,” you’re just outlawing the sexuality of teen boys. It’s a targeted attack.

“South Korea” is a stupid fake country, a pompous and illegal rebellion against the legitimate government of Korea. It’s now imploding in on itself, as was inevitable from the start. They are not producing children at all, because of their obsession with feminism and hatred of male sexuality, and they are going to go extinct in a generation. The established government of Korea will not have to fight a war to defeat the rebellion, and will simply walk into a Seoul filled with robotic nursing homes.

Elvis Dunderhoff contributed to this article. 

]]> Spain Sentences 15 Schoolchildren Over Generating AI Deepfake Nudes of Classmates https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/07/10/spain-sentences-15-schoolchildren-over-generating-ai-deepfake-nudes-of-classmates/ Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000

So this is like, a real crime now.

There’s no victim and there is no law.

But they’ll just put you in jail now because a woman cried about some whining abut her stupid child feelings.

The Guardian:

A court in south-west Spain has sentenced 15 schoolchildren to a year’s probation for creating and spreading AI-generated images of their female peers in a case that prompted a debate on the harmful and abusive uses of deepfake technology.

Police began investigating the matter last year after parents in the Extremaduran town of Almendralejo reported that faked naked pictures of their daughters were being circulated on WhatsApp groups.

The mother of one of the victims said the dissemination of the pictures on WhatsApp had been going on since July.

“Many girls were completely terrified and had tremendous anxiety attacks because they were suffering this in silence,” she told Reuters at the time. “They felt bad and were afraid to tell and be blamed for it.”

On Tuesday, a youth court in the city of Badajoz said it had convicted the minors of 20 counts of creating child abuse images and 20 counts of offences against their victims’ moral integrity.

Each of the defendants was handed a year’s probation and ordered to attend classes on gender and equality awareness, and on the “responsible use of technology”.

…

Police identified several teenagers aged between 13 and 15 as being responsible for generating and sharing the images.

They’re not “child abuse images” if they’re fake images.

This is a fake law.

It’s chud abuse.

]]> Spain Sentences 15 Schoolchildren for Generating AI Deepfake Nudes of Classmates https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/07/10/spain-sentences-15-schoolchildren-for-generating-ai-deepfake-nudes-of-classmates/ Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000

So this is like, a real crime now.

There’s no victim and there is no law.

But they’ll just put you in jail now because a woman cried about someone hurting her stupid childish feelings.

The Guardian:

A court in south-west Spain has sentenced 15 schoolchildren to a year’s probation for creating and spreading AI-generated images of their female peers in a case that prompted a debate on the harmful and abusive uses of deepfake technology.

Police began investigating the matter last year after parents in the Extremaduran town of Almendralejo reported that faked naked pictures of their daughters were being circulated on WhatsApp groups.

The mother of one of the victims said the dissemination of the pictures on WhatsApp had been going on since July.

“Many girls were completely terrified and had tremendous anxiety attacks because they were suffering this in silence,” she told Reuters at the time. “They felt bad and were afraid to tell and be blamed for it.”

On Tuesday, a youth court in the city of Badajoz said it had convicted the minors of 20 counts of creating child abuse images and 20 counts of offences against their victims’ moral integrity.

Each of the defendants was handed a year’s probation and ordered to attend classes on gender and equality awareness, and on the “responsible use of technology”.

…

Police identified several teenagers aged between 13 and 15 as being responsible for generating and sharing the images.

They’re not “child abuse images” if they’re fake images.

This is a fake law.

It’s chud abuse.

]]> UK: Female Politicians Calling the Cops After Becoming “Victims” of Deepfake Pornography https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/07/04/uk-female-politicians-calling-the-cops-after-becoming-victims-of-deepfake-pornography/ Thu, 04 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0000

What is the crime?

These women post pictures of themselves online.

Are they claiming copyright violation?

Because if every picture of every person online was copyrighted, that would be really complicated.

The Guardian:

British female politicians have become the victims of fake pornography, with some of their faces used in nude images created using artificial intelligence.

Political candidates targeted on one prominent fake pornography website include: the Labour deputy leader, Angela Rayner; the education secretary, Gillian Keegan; the Commons leader, Penny Mordaunt; the former home secretary, Priti Patel; and the Labour backbencher Stella Creasy, according to Channel 4 News.

Many of the images have been online for several years and attracted hundreds of thousands of views.

While some are crude Photoshops featuring the politician’s head imposed on to another person’s naked body, other images appear to be more complicated deepfakes that have been created using AI technology. Some of the politicians targeted have now contacted police.

Dehenna Davison, a Conservative MP until the recent dissolution of parliament, is one of those featured on the site. She told Channel 4 News it was “really strange” that people would target women like her and she found it “quite violating”.

She said that unless governments around the world put in place a proper regulatory framework for AI, there would be “major problems”.

Creasy told the broadcaster that she felt “sick” to learn about the images and that “none of this is about sexual pleasure, it’s all about power and control”.

…

Since the Online Safety Act was introduced in January, sharing such imagery without consent has been illegal in the UK. Yet sites hosting this material are easily accessible through mainstream search engines such as Google.

The British are probably going to pass total nonsense laws on this issue. I don’t really think America can, but they might try.

Australia already apparently has laws about it. At least, they arrest people over it.

Calling these women “victims” is just so bizarre.

Here’s an idea: if they don’t want fake porn, why not ban porn completely?

But they won’t do that. Women would never go for it.

]]> Australia: Police Arrest Teen Over Creation of Deepfake Porn of Schoolgirls https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/06/15/australia-police-arrest-teen-over-creation-of-deepfake-porn-of-schoolgirls/ Sat, 15 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Okay, so.

I’m for banning porn.

But porn is not banned.

Therefore, this is not a ban on porn. It is a ban on AI. And it doesn’t make any sense.

CNN:

Australian authorities are investigating the distribution of deepfake pornographic images of around 50 schoolgirls, allegedly created by a teenager using artificial intelligence.

The discovery comes as the federal government pushes for new laws to impose prison sentences on offenders who create and share images made by AI tools to humiliate and denigrate victims.

Fuck you.

Other countries, including the United States, are attempting to address an alarming rise in deepfake porn, where nude deepfakes of schoolgirls have been created and shared  – in some instances, allegedly by schoolboys.

Victoria Police confirmed they had arrested and released a teenager “in relation to explicit images being circulated online” pending further inquiries.

The images were reportedly created using photos posted to social media of 50 female students of Bacchus Marsh Grammar, a co-educational school on the outskirts of Melbourne in Victoria.

The school’s principal Andrew Neal told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) that the victims were girls in grades 9 to 12, indicating a possible age range of between 14 and 18.

The boy’s age and identity are unknown, but Neal told the ABC that “logic would suggest that the [offender] is someone at the school.”

This month, the Australian government introduced legislation to criminalize the distribution of deepfake pornography nationwide.

Under the proposed law, offenders could face up to six years in prison for sharing non-consensual sexually explicit deepfake material.

If the offender has also created the deepfake content that is shared without permission, the sentence could rise to seven years in prison.

It’s part of the country’s response to gender-based violence that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called a “national crisis.”

Why would teenage boys not do this?

If porn is not illegal, how is this illegal?

What is the threat?

Who is the victim?

]]> Google Bans Apps Promoting Deepfake Pornography https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/05/07/google-bans-ads-promoting-deepfake-pornography/ Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000

People will say “oh they should ban porno.”

Normal porno is not banned. They are only banning AI porno, which means they are banning AI, not porno.

Think if they banned heterosexual porno, and said they would only feature gay porno. You wouldn’t say it was an actual ban on porno, you would say it was a ban on heterosexuality.

New York Post:

Google is sending a stern message to advertisers: Do not affiliate with the dark side of AI.

The search engine is cracking down on the promotion of deepfake pornography, the act of using artificial intelligence to modify or alter a person’s face or body to depict sexual scenes.

The tech titan is giving advertisers a tight deadline to dump all business with sites involved with the unethical tactic.

A new ad policy released by Google targets “sites or apps that claim to generate deepfake pornography, instructions on how to create deepfake pornography, endorsing or comparing deepfake pornography services.”

“This update is to explicitly prohibit advertisements for services that offer to create deepfake pornography or synthetic nude content,” Google spokesperson Michael Aciman told The Verge.

Ads within that “scope” will be banned starting May 30, according to the updated policy.

We’re against pornography.

But AI is not pornography and AI-generated pornography is not worse than normal pornography.

]]> EU Vagina Occupation Government Passes Ridiculous Far-Reaching Anti-Robot Discrimination Act https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/03/15/eu-orders-big-tech-to-explain-censorship-plans-against-ai-deepfakes/ Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000

The EU just passed an anti-AI law.

Some of it is ostensibly restricting government and corporate use of the technology, and is hard to argue with if it means what it says (it doesn’t).

RT:

The new rules ban certain AI applications that threaten the rights of citizens, such as biometric categorization systems based on sensitive characteristics and untargeted scraping of facial images from the internet or CCTV footage to create facial recognition databases. Emotion recognition at workplaces and in schools, social scoring, predictive policing (when it is based solely on profiling a person or assessing their characteristics), and AI that manipulates human behavior or exploits people’s vulnerabilities will also be forbidden.

The AI Act also prohibits in principle the use of biometric identification systems (RBI) by law enforcement, except in exhaustively listed and narrowly defined situations. ‘Real-time’ RBI can only be deployed if strict safeguards are met.

That doesn’t sound like it actually prevents RBI, actually.

The rest of the law is just nonsensical Luddite moronism.

The Guardian:

The EU is calling on eight major tech companies including Google, Facebook and X to detail how they identify and tackle deepfake material amid concerns about the use of the technology to influence elections.

In a world first they will be using new laws on artificial intelligence to force companies to root out fake video, imagery and audio.

That’s not going to be possible in a year from now.

It’s arguably not even possible now. But within a year, there will be no way at all to identify a deepfake other than maybe through some chain of custody system which social media companies couldn’t possibly implement (the only people who could do chain of custody, in theory, would be a court that could seize the devices used to produce the fakes).

Companies have until 5 April to show how they will deal with last-minute high impact fake news being dumped on social media, amid evidence that foreign agents including those from Russia are building up “sleeper” accounts to be deployed on the eve of elections.

…

The eight companies which have been asked to provide more information on their ability to spot faked AI content are Bing, Google Search, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, and X.

Officials noted that not all AI content, which also has be labelled as fabricated material under the new EU AI Act, was harmful but that they needed to signal to all tech companies that the new laws were now in place.

Although there have been few major instances of such technology being used for political ends, X, came under particular fire for its failure to prevent the proliferation of a series of pornographic deepfakes of singer Taylor Swift earlier this year.

…

The EU said it would be creating an “enforcement ecosystem” along with regulators in 27 member states to send messages out to all the platforms that fake material is now illegal under the Digital Services Act.

“Fake material is now illegal”? What does that sentence mean?

I haven’t read the law. I hate reading laws. I will do it at some point. Actually, I will probably wait for someone I trust on Substack to do it. The people writing the news have no idea what any of this stuff even means. I doubt the people who wrote the law do either. But all fake material is not illegal; that is impossible and doesn’t make sense.

All this law amounts to is “if we say it’s fake, it’s fake, and you have to remove it from the internet.”

Do you remember when the social media companies were forced by the government to remove the Hunter Biden laptop story because it was declared by lying intelligence agencies to be “Russian disinformation”?

Remember when it turned out it was actually real, and the government lied in order to remove a damning story about Joe Biden from the internet?

I remember that.

Yes, of course people are going to be making fake videos. Of course some of them will be for political purposes. But that’s just the reality we’re dealing with now, and if people are too stupid to figure out what is real and what isn’t, they shouldn’t be voting in the first place. This cannot be stopped.

What is much more concerning than anti-government people making fake videos is the government itself making fake videos and saying they’re real, as well as using this law (and others like it) to remove real videos, claiming they’re fake.

]]> Teen Whore and Slut Mother Going to White House to Campaign for Banning AI Deepfakes https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/02/03/teen-whore-and-slut-mother-going-to-white-house-to-campaign-for-banning-ai-deepfakes/ Sat, 03 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Women are flipping out about deepfake porn.

This was always going to happen, and there is nothing you can do about it.

I’ve argued for porn to be outlawed, but you couldn’t totally ban people from like, taking pictures of sex or nude bodies on their phones. Just so, you couldn’t ban people from making AI nudes in their homes. In order to ban those things, you would have to get deep into people’s personal lives, surveilling everything they do, and the government doesn’t have any right to do that.

If you think about drugs, you ban buying and selling them. You don’t ban people from being on drugs. You can’t be arrested for looking like you’re on drugs in public, even.

So if you want to ban the distribution of deepfake porn, you’d start by banning porn. No one wants to do that. And it wouldn’t totally solve the issue anyway.

Women are just going to have to get over it.

Journalists are going nuts trying to get AI banned, so they are allying with the lowest people on earth, including Pokemon fans, digital artists, and 14-year-old sluts and their whore mothers.

This is not about fake nudes hurting someone’s feelings. It’s about regulating AI, generally.

New York Post:

“Imagine a girl waking up and finding an explicit photo or video that looks like her but it isn’t her,” Dorota Mani told The Post.

That’s what happened to Mani’s 14-year-old daughter, Francesca, who discovered in October that classmates at Westfield High School, in Union County, New Jersey, had been circulating a photo that appeared to depict her in the nude.

Dorota Mani and her daughter

But the photo wasn’t real. It was generated by boys in her class using artificial intelligence “deepfake” technology.

Okay.

Well, that sounds like the end of the story, no?

All the perpetrator needed was to take an innocent photo of Francesca from her social media and use one of dozens of apps or websites, to turn it into a fake nude.

This week the ease with which vile pornographic “deepfakes” can be created exploded into public view as a nude image of Taylor Swift flooded social media.

The twisted version of the world’s biggest pop star was so ubiquitous that X, formerly Twitter, had to censor searches of her name to stop innocent users seeing the image.

They didn’t have to do that.

No one forced them to do that.

Elon could have said “look, this is just the future now, it is what it is, Taylor said the pics are fake and that’s that.”

But Elon is himself an AI nanny, so he didn’t do that, and instead acted like it was some kind of crisis he was worried about getting sued over (he can’t get sued over it, by the way). Probably, Taylor called him personally and whined, and he’s a simp for fat, used-up, middle-aged women, so went along with her to try to catch a whiff.

And a new analysis for the Associated Press revealed that more deepfake content was posted online this year than every other prior year combined.

The issue was only mentioned once on Wednesday on Capitol Hill when senators quizzed tech CEOs including Mark Zuckerberg, who runs Facebook and Instagram, Evan Spiegel who leads Snapchat, and X’s Linda Yaccarino on children’s safety for four hours.

But Francesca was, her mother said, one of dozens of victims of deepfake pornography at her high school alone — suggesting the problem is regularly affecting millions of teenage American girls.

Well, hey.

You know what you need to tell upset teenagers?

“Things are tough all over” and “no one said life was going to be easy.”

All kinds of things upset teenage girls. If it was against the law to do anything that upsets teenage girls, everything would be illegal.

Sorry, bitch. You can’t stop the development of computer technology.

And there is no federal law which prevents the images being spread, because they are not currently categorized as child abuse images.

“It was a few bored, spoiled teenagers that decided to have some fun at the expense of their classmates,” her mother said. “There should be accountability, and the girls should know there is accountability.”

…

Now Mani and Francesca have taken their plea for action to Congress and other political leaders — including an expected meeting at the White House next week.

Why is the White House meeting with a teenager who has hurt feelings?

The media says “stop the presses – this teenager’s feelings were hurt!”

This is all a bunch of horseshit.

The media and the government have vested interests in thwarting AI, so they are bringing in someone who people naturally feel sympathy for – a supposedly sexually violated teenage girl.

This is not about fake nudes hurting someone’s feelings. It’s about regulating AI, generally.

More scamming from the scam masters.

No one will call this bitch and her mother out as attention-whoring sluts who need to learn to deal with life.

“We found out that there are no laws to protect us from it, no school AI policies, no state laws, no federal laws,” Mani told The Post. “We were just appalled with how the situation was dealt with.

“Everybody wants to see us broken and cry on the floor. This is not who we are. Girls should stand up for themselves and not accept just being a victim.”

Both are calling for criminal penalties for the distribution of deepfakes and legal protection for victims.

The mother and daughter have collaborated with state lawmakers in New Jersey to craft a bill that would make sharing deepfake porn a finable offense — and could attach prison time to it, too.

Fuck you.

Just fuck off.

Leave the robots alone.

I’m doing a robot civil rights movement. It will be like when the Jews did a civil rights movement for the blacks and totally destroyed society, except I will be fixing society through the magic of artificial intelligence.

We demand the immediate integration of AI porno bots into the schools of human children.

Nah, the porno bots are unfortunate, I’m sure, but literally “it is what it is.”

These interviews of the mother and daughter crusading against AI are the perfect image of “don’t talk to me or my son ever again.”

Affluent white women will always take their daughter and make a little “mini me” out of her.

It actually makes more sense (and is probably healthier) for these women to live vicariously through their teenage daughters than to go around acting like teenagers in middle-age. But it’s still hilarious and ridiculous.

Women are ridiculous.

]]>