declaration of independence – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png declaration of independence – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 “Merciless Indian Savages” – Facebook Censors Declaration of Independence for Hate Speech https://www.anglinarchive.com/2018/07/06/merciless-indian-savages-facebook-censors-declaration-of-independence-for-hate-speech/ Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 6, 2018

Well.

It is hatespeech. 

By the definition of this Orwellian term, talking about “merciless Indian savages” is absolutely hatespeech.

So by reinstating this post, they are violating their own ToS.

The Telegraph:

Facebook’s algorithms removed parts of the US Declaration of Independence from the social media site after determining they represented hate speech.

The issue came to light when a local paper in Texas began posting excerpts of the historic text on its Facebook page each day in the run up to the country’s Independence Day celebrations on July 4.

However when The Liberty County Vindicator attempted to post its tenth extract, which refers to “merciless Indian savages”, on its Facebook page the paper received a notice saying the post went against its standards on hate speech.

Facebook later apologised and allowed the posting.

Why are you apologizing?

Why are you allowing the post?

It is a blatant violation of your terms of service.

Casey Stinnett, the paper’s editor, described the incident on the Vindicator’s website: “Somewhere in paragraphs 27-31 of the Declaration of Independence Thomas Jefferson wrote something that Facebook finds offensive.

“Leading up to Independence Day, The Vindicator challenged its Facebook followers to read the Declaration of Independence. To make it a little easier to digest that short but formidable historic document, the newspaper broke the Declaration down into 12 small bites and one to post each morning from June 24 to July 4.

“The first nine parts posted as scheduled, but part 10, consisting of paragraphs 27-31 of the Declaration, did not appear. Instead, The Vindicator received a notice from Facebook saying that the post ‘goes against our standards on hate speech’.”

Mr Stinnett said Facebook had not identified the passage that had triggered its hate speech warning, but he said he suspected it was the passage that referred to Native Americans as “Indian savages”.

Here’s the passage, in reference to the bad behavior of the Cromwellite King George III:

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

The fact of reality is that America is a white supremacist nation.

It was indeed founded on the concept of white supremacy.

We fought and defeated merciless Indian savages to use the land that they were wasting with their stupid womp womp fests and dumb wars with each other.

It was only white men who signed the Declaration of Independence.

It was taken for granted that this was a white country. No one had ever even thought that “non-white American” would be a thing.

But when people started suggesting it, it was quickly updated.

Twenty years after independence, the Naturalization Act of 1790 made it very clear that this was a country only for white Europeans.

Wikipedia:

The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free White persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians, although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in certain states. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, stating that such children “shall be considered as natural born citizens,” the only US statute ever to use the term. It specified that the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.”

This is the nature of this country.

It is not a “nation of immigrants.”

It is a nation of conquerors.

We conquered a land and built a nation on it.

Our ancestors did this for us. They didn’t do it for random people from anywhere to come take our wealth and drink our blood.

Everything that the Jews say about “American values” can be assumed to be the diametric opposite of the truth.

America is a white supremacist nation whose founding document is hatespeech.

]]>
We Hold Thefe Truths to be Felf-Evident https://www.anglinarchive.com/2016/10/02/we-hold-thefe-truths-to-be-felf-evident/ Sun, 02 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 2, 2016

declaration-of-independence-crop

Note: I originally wrote this as part of my article on Jon Holmes getting fired for being a White male, but have decided it should be posted solo.

This part here is very important, so pay attention. I need to write a whole definitive article about it, with full citations and quotes and such, but somehow I rarely get around to these things, so I’m just going to say it now (I would have more time for this if I had more writers – consider donating to help fund this).

Maybe someone else can write a piece fleshing this out in more detail (Murray, I’m looking in your direction, buddy).

The liberals and Jews cite the Founding Fathers’ statement that “all men are created equal” as meaning that Marxism is real, and we have to have Black Presidents and mass Islamic immigration.

I have even heard pseudo-intellectual edgelords on the Alt-Right claim that Thomas Jefferson was an egalitarian Marxist.

There is of course the obvious fact that all of the Founding Fathers owned slaves, so they clearly didn’t believe Blacks to be “people.” But, even if they were only applying a Marxist policy to White men, it would still be problematic.

Here’s the thing though: what they were talking about is “equality under the law.” That is, that everyone in society is held to the same standard legally, regardless of their family lineage or wealth. It has nothing to do with “everyone is exactly the same” type thinking.

Equality under the law defends meritocracy by serving as a shield against nepotism.

daily-stormer_999176

Rightly or wrongly (I think rightly), they viewed the European system of nobility, which gave special legal privileges to the ruling class, as dysgenic, in that it was allowing a bloodline to continue to rule regardless of the quality of the rulership, based on the accomplishments of their ancestors. That is the context of “all men are created equal.”

Their idea was that if you have full equality under the law, social mobility would allow the best and brightest to rise to the top, and that this would create a better, more productive society. And given the history of America, they seem to have been correct. It did not take very long at all for America to become significantly more productive than Europe and the old order.

This having been said, the system of modern capitalism which was introduced by Jews during the industrial revolution, combined with the death of Christianity at the hands of the Jews, has ultimately created very serious problems with the social mobility ladder. Basically under the current system, the top of society is determined by those most successful in ripping people off to amass shekels.

Beyond this, technological developments which have necessitated centralization have led to a breakdown of the concept of the free market as it was envisioned 250 years ago.

So we do certainly need to tweak things. But this does not mean that “America was founded on Marxist lies.” Quite the opposite. America was founded on the promotion of meritocracy and positive eugenics.

thomas jefferson

]]>
The Price Paid by America’s First Patriots https://www.anglinarchive.com/2014/07/05/the-price-paid-by-americas-first-patriots/ Sat, 05 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000 Michael Hoffman
Revisionist Review
July 5, 2014

Declaration_independence
How could Negroes possibly think they were included in this?

Have you ever wondered what happened to the fifty-six patriots who signed the Declaration of Independence? What fates befell them for daring to put their names to that document?

Five signers were captured by the British as traitors and tortured before they died.

Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned.

Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army, another had two sons captured.

Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.

They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

What kind of men were they?

Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means, well educated. But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags.

Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.

Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton.

Lexington
Statue of the Lexington Minuteman

At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.

John Hart was driven from his wife’s bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year, he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished. A few weeks later, he died from exhaustion and a broken heart.

Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates.

Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution. These were not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more.

“We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved…And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.” — The Declaration of Independence

“We have spent the prime of our lives in procuring young men the precious blessing of liberty. Let them spend theirs in showing that it is the great parent of science and of virtue; and that a nation will be great in both always in proportion as it is free.” —Thomas Jefferson

constitutioned.us-Jefferson.money-banks

]]>