Not nearly as terrified as 16% DeSantis: pic.twitter.com/JROVzF2kMx

— Osher Feldman (@osherfeldman) April 27, 2023

Why do you say that?

— Osher Feldman (@osherfeldman) April 27, 2023

I’m just now learning that Bill Mitchell (an aggressive and ridiculous plastic surgery boomer Trump sychophant Twitter personality) is back and is a DeSantis shill.

I will never forget the day I learned that “@mitchellvii” is “Mitchell 7.” For at least a year, I thought it was “Mitchavelli,” like the Machiavelli of Mitchells, and I will never forget associating that face with thinking up that internet identity, and the joy it brought me.

I guess switching sides to DeSantis is a bit Mitchavellian.

I’ll bet he’ll get paid $1,500,000, when said and done. While he’s got no engagement, he’s got nearly half a million twitter followers still, and I think the people handing out money or DeSantis are taking big cuts, basically being paid commissions on passing out cash.

It’s looking a bit sloppy.

New York Post:

Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday declared that he is so far ahead of his 2024 Republican presidential primary opponents that he doesn’t see a reason to participate in the GOP debates.

“I’m leading by 40 points. A lot of people say, ‘Why would you do a debate when you have people at two and three and fifteen and fourteen [percent]?’” Trump told John Catsimatidis, host of the “Cats & Cosby Show” on WABC 770.

“People don’t debate when they have these massive leads. They say, ‘Why would we debate?’ I would have a hostile group of anchors — a hostile network — asking questions. Why would I do that?” the 76-year-old former president said.

Trump went on to decry that the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in California, site of the second scheduled Republican presidential primary debate, is “run by the Washington Post,” which he derided as “the enemy of the people.”

“The publisher of the Washington Post is the chairman of the Reagan library. And that’s where one of the debates would be. I don’t want to be there,” Trump told Catsimatidis, referring to former Reagan White House aide Frederick Ryan Jr., who is now chairman of the Reagan library and publisher and CEO of the Washington Post.

Trump continued, “When you’re way up, you don’t do debates.”

The former commander-in-chief then reiterated, “You’re going to have people at 1% and less than 1% asking you questions? It’s sort of like crazy.”

The funniest thing would have been if Trump had thought the @ was Mitchavelli and hired him as a strategist because he looks Mitchavellian.

And then Mitchell was dumb enough to say “it’s Mitchell 7” and Trump was like “well, maybe I’ll hire one of the other six – you’re fired.”

He’s right about the debates, I guess. But I’m still personally confused as to what the purpose of this campaign is.

Honestly, I want the Bill Mitchell lore now. He was banned in the lead up to 2020 just because the official policy of the site was that you weren’t allowed to support Trump at all unless you were an important intelligence asset that is also totally ineffectual (basically, I think Jack Posobiec was the only Trump supporter on the site).

I wish I was Tom Woods and did a 30 minute podcast every day and was really rich and filled with fake emotions that feel like real emotions, and I could call up Mitchell and get the lore.

Oh, this is sick.

CBS News:

The Commission on Presidential Debates said in a statement on Monday that President Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden will have two minutes of uninterrupted time at the beginning of each 15-minute segment at the final debate, which is set to be held Thursday. To enforce this rule, the candidate who does not have the floor will have his mic muted.

After the two minutes of uninterrupted time, the mics will be on for open discussion.

“We realize, after discussions with both campaigns, that neither campaign may be totally satisfied with the measures announced today,” the Commission on Presidential Debates said in statement. “One may think they go too far, and one may think they do not go far enough. We are comfortable these actions strike the right balance, and that they are in the best interest of the American people, for whom these debates are held.”

I’m not even sure Trump should do it, frankly.

Just tell them to send out another bitch like when Biden refused to go to the second debate and sent Savannah Guthrie and all she did the whole time was defend satanic pedophiles.

He crushed that bitch. It was like pushing a cripple down stairs. This bitch comes out, literally says some shit like: “will you admit that satanic pedophilia is actually good?”

Frankly, what Trump did to that bitch was more brutal than raping and murdering a child in the basement of Comet Ping Pong.

That’s going to be their next argument: “Well, you say we raped and murdered children in the name of Satan, but what about what Trump did to Savannah Guthrie during that debate? You Republicans have no room to talk, frankly.”

Muting Trump is just going to make him look like a bitch.

And it’s dumb.

I mean, if it’s really just for the first 15 minutes, then okay.

But have you seen this bitch who’s running the debate?

NEW (from me)

Kristen Welker, upcoming presidential debate moderator, has deep Democrat tieshttps://t.co/5YD5TOADB9

— Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) October 17, 2020

She’s fat and she’s a stupid bitch. She claims to be half black and half American Indian, but she looks like a Paki.

Trump should just debate that bitch without Joe Biden present, and that way we wouldn’t need the mute button, because she’s a stronk wammen who don’t need no mute button.

I do not trust that bitch to not use the mute button later in the debate, every time Trump brings up Hunter Biden.

The thing is: how is Trump going to know? 

Following yesterday’s part 1, we have today’s part 2 of Project Veritas’ expose of CNN.

They found a guy who worked for the network wanted to wear a hidden camera and record these assholes, and he found quite a bit of totally not surprising behavior from this Jew network.

Here are their bulletpoints from this part:

• CNN Senior Justice Correspondent Evan Perez Says, ‘Joe Biden Has a Problem’ Because of his Son’s Foreign Business Dealings; “It Looks Bad. It Smells Bad.”
• CNN President Jeff Zucker Pushes Kamala Harris’ Demand to Take Down Trump’s Twitter Account; “I Think it’s a Good Segment…Not Going to Happen, But it’s a Good Talking – it’s a Good Segment.”
• Zucker on Harris: “She is Also Retooling Her Struggling Campaign.”
• CNN Media Coordinator Christian Sierra Says Network is Less Fair to Andrew Yang and Amy Klobuchar, “They’re Pro-Top Contenders.”
• Sierra: “I Think They Like Warren a Lot” “…They Don’t Like Tulsi Gabbard”
• CNN Media Coordinator Nick Neville Says “People Would Change the Channel” if Network Broadcasted a Biden Rally.
• CNN VP and Political Director David Chalian Believes That Andrew Yang Will Not Become the Democratic Nominee for President.
• CNN Insider Cary Poarch: “I Actually Came to CNN a Registered Democrat. I Campaigned and Voted for Bernie in the Primaries of the 16’ election;” “…All That I Thought I Knew and Hoped to be at CNN Was False.”
• Poarch: “It’s an Unwritten Rule That if You Are Center, Center Right, or Heaven Forbid, Full Right Republican Trump Supporter, Then You Are Not Welcome at CNN.”
• Insider Cary Poarch Wants ‘Free and Fair Election’ and Not ‘Some Ideology Shoved Down My Throat;’ Wants CNN to ‘Get Back to the Facts and Get Back to Reporting the News.’

Terribly organized bulletpoints, if we’re honest here.

Project Veritas does all this great recording, but they have serious problems with the way they publish their material. Their website is confusing, and has old stuff before new stuff. The formatting is terrible, and it is poorly written and confusing.

I would do my own bulletpoints. But it’s kind of like, whatever.

You can watch the video and see a bunch of assholes from CNN saying that they’re fake news. Which everyone already knew, including the people who watch it and believe it.

NPCs actually enjoy believing lies and feel comforted by them. Like children being told “everything is going to be alright,” even whilst an army of zombies is about to break down the barricades and eat them.

Whatever. I don’t care. This is all boring.

What I want is for maybe Pakistan to nuke India, maybe Russia invade Estonia, Donald Trump to declare martial law until Jeffrey Epstein’s murder is solved – something that isn’t just more of this endless, tedious boredom.

Finally, something I didn’t hate appeared on a Sunday news show. These things have been boring as all hell for months and months.

Andrew Yang was on with the ratty Jewish trickster Chris Wallace. The best part was when he called him “Wang.”

Yang’s polling ahead of Beto O’Rourke at 3%. Which isn’t a good number. But hey – look at the money that’s been poured into Beto, and he already beat him.

He could just keep rising.

He only got two minutes and twenty seconds in the first debate, which is less time than any other candidate got.

Is there any person on earth who could make the argument that Joe Biden is more interesting than Andrew Yang? These kikes expect us to believe he is FIVE TIMES more interesting?

No one is interested in any of these gross people who run our government.

At least Andrew Yang is a good person, and not some kind of sickening weirdo.

We are all tired of these weirdos and black people.

Even the blacks who take fitness seriously, we’re tired of.

I’m generally enjoying the takeover of American politics by Chinese spies.

But I have to say, I still find Trump’s Chinaperson Kathy Zhu slightly more interesting than Andrew Yang.

Just slightly. 

Here are some key points you need to understand about this video:

1. Vegan faggot thinks that killing and eating chickens is as bad as Jeffery Dahmer killing and eating children.
2. Vegan faggot advocates genocide of the entire human race.
3. Vegan faggot thinks that the only purpose to life is feeling good and any suffering means you should just commit suicide.

Using humor to push a political agenda is the most effective way to push that agenda; anyone who has read Stormer for any length of time understands this.

The left also understands this, and attempt to push their own agendas in a similar way through late night TV.

The difference between them and us is they have no real arguments based in truth on their side, while we do.

If you are ever caught debating a point, especially with someone who has more wit than the average leftist, remember this.

If you can argue your point in a way that is both factually accurate and funny, anyone listening will be inclined to follow you.

The winners of arguments are always going to be the people that leave the debate laughing or who make their opponent angry enough to stop talking, no matter what they had said.

tfw you’re told you can’t win against a seizure granny

The normally very good Breitbart News has published a very low-energy piece about the upcoming debates. This is easily explained by the fact that for some reason, they allow skypes to write for their publication.

Okay… but why though?

Don’t the good folks at Breitbart know the saying?

I thought everyone knew this, smdh.

Ugh.

Anyway, let’s deconstruct this skype’s “arguments.”

Breitbart:

Blue State Blues: Sorry, Trump Fans, Hillary Clinton Will Win First Debate

In the middle of August, it looked as though the first presidential debate, to be held on Monday at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, would be Donald Trump’s last chance to rescue his failing campaign with a dramatic surprise attack on Hillary Clinton.

Since then, however, Trump has mounted a comeback, and now leads in several swing states, with a path to 270 Electoral College votes and victory. Now, the first debate looks like Clinton’s last chance to stop the Trump surge.

And she is likely to do so.

Trump fans, brace yourselves: Hillary Clinton will win the first presidential debate. She will not do enough to put away the Republican nominee, but she will stop his momentum and force him to work that much harder to win.

Are you trying to skype us, Pollak?

Because it looks like you’re trying to skype us.

Are you really trying to peddle the notion that this woman:

is going to win against this man:

in a debate?

There are several reasons Clinton will win. Ironically, one of them is her fragile health.

Winning debates is all about beating expectations. And expectations for Trump are very low. Until recently, it seemed that all he would have to do to win is avoid major gaffes, and keep his cool.

But now, expectations for Clinton are even lower. Her collapse on September 11 has led to wild speculation that she might not be able to make it through 90 minutes. If she merely stays upright, she beats expectations.

(The Commission on Presidential Debates confirmed to Breitbart News Thursday that the candidates will be standing for the first debate. If they were seated, Clinton would have more energy but lose the strategic benefit of diminished expectations.)

No, you lying, rat-faced skype.

Debates aren’t about “beating expectations.” How did you even come up with that kind of skypish nonsense?

Debates are won by the party which looks the most dominant, the most confident, and to a lesser extent the party which has the best arguments.

The people will be drawn to the candidate that is the most charismatic.

If a rat joined the debate, would he win because he beat the expectation that a rat can’t talk?

Even without low expectations, Clinton should win the first debate, for two reasons.

The first is that she is the most seasoned debater in American political life today. Clinton does not have any real achievements to boast after eight years as First Lady, another eight years in the Senate, four years as Secretary of State, and two presidential campaigns. But years of debating — and years of evading questions — have helped her develop a polished, if uninspiring, public persona that conveys competence.

Debating isn’t the same as being under investigation for criminal behavior.

For one, unlike all the other people she’s dodged questions from, Trump isn’t going to pull punches and treat her with kid gloves. She’s not used to that. She gets upset when sympathetic interviewers ask her questions she doesn’t like.

How do you think she’ll react when Trump calls her out on her criminality right there, on the spot, and doesn’t buy her paper thin little excuses like the media does?

What does it matter if I committed perjury and large scale fraud?

Also, just because she can dodge accusations, doesn’t mean she’s not going to look really bad for being a skypey con-artist.

Clinton has two main debating tricks. One is to deploy distracting but serious-sounding details whenever she is faced with a question she does not want to answer. The other is to laugh at uncomfortable moments. Her laugh — a “cackle,” to her critics — is awkward but disarming, humanizing.

Those aren’t debating tactics, you retard, they’re just ways of throwing off dumb journalists. They wouldn’t work on someone who truly wants to destroy her, and isn’t just throwing softball questions at her.

She has weaknesses, too: she sometimes misreads her audience, as she did by using the term “slum lord” to attack then-Sen. Barack Obama for his Chicago cronies in 2008. But her tactics are usually effective.

Yeah.

She also called a quarter of America a “basket of deplorables” on TV. In a prepared speech.

Can you imagine the goofs she’ll make in a improvised debate?

The second reason that Clinton should win is that while Trump is a great persuader, and an entertaining speaker, he is a poor debater. For one thing, he is too quick to take offense at tough questions or jabs from opponents. The celebrated clash with Megyn Kelly in the first primary debate last year was entirely avoidable, and cost him female support. Trump also sometimes stumbles on policy questions beyond his core issues. He often forgets his own past statements and misstates his own views.

Yeah, Trump is a poor debater.

That’s probably why he completely massacred all the Republican opposition during the primaries. And unlike Hillary, those guys were actually known as good speakers.

Remember this, guys? Yeah. This happened.

Also, remember that the Republican primaries were Trump’s first real debating experiences. Now, he has that experience under his belt, and certainly got coaching for his rhetoric. His speeches are refined, his policies have been clarified.

Hillary will be dealing with a new and improved version of the man who humiliated all of his opponents during the earlier debates. And she couldn’t even deal with the reanimated corpse of a communist skype.

lol.

Friendly reminder: this also happened. More or less.

It is telling that while Trump successfully used the Republican primary debates to pick off his opponents one-by-one with a series of well-crafted “kill shots” — “low-energy” Jeb Bush, “little” Marco Rubio, “lyin’” Ted Cruz, Carly “look at that face” Fiorina — he won very few of the debates, online polls notwithstanding. If the moderator, NBC’s Lester Holt, decides to play “fact-checker” against Trump — something Trump is clearly concerned about — Trump is probably going to suffer most.

Bro, bro.

Are you saying that Trump lost the debates?

And still won the nomination?

By historically unprecedented margins?

Let me give you a newsflash here:

The point of a debate is to beat the other guys and win the election.

Trump will humiliate Hillary, and win the election.

But there is one larger reason that Clinton will win the first debate: the media will tell everyone she has won, regardless.

They are openly hostile to Trump, they know Clinton needs help, and they want to make up for Matt Lauer and Jimmy Fallon, who committed the grave sin of being fair to both.

With legions of faux fact-checkers, and battalions of biased pundits, the fix is in. Clinton will enjoy a bump in the polls– and Trump will have to claw his way back in the weeks and debates that follow.

Yes, the (((media))) will tell everyone she’s won.

Kind of like (((you’re))) telling everyone she will win, right?

What this Pollak character is doing here, is preparing his readership to accept the lies and deception crafted by the rest of the media after the debates, instead of rebelling against the obvious distortion of reality which they’re sure to engage in.

Very low energy of Breitbart to have published this. I guess they wanted to cause controversy in order to drive up their views? Who knows.

Forget about that.

The debate is coming.

And it’s going to be glorious.

It’s a great opportunity to do a last BBQ before the cold kicks in. Invite your friends, invite your fellow Stormer Book Club members, and have a blast!

Victory is ours.