I’ve said for the longest time that the theory of evolution must be racist, as it basically says that black people are the missing link between man and ape.

I mean, seriously – just look at them.

Everyone knows they look like apes.

Remember when they flipped out over the H&M ad that had a black child in the hoodie that read, “coolest monkey in the jungle”?

Or when they flipped out over that Australian Serena Williams cartoon?

Here’s the question: if liberals don’t know they look like apes, why are these things immediately offensive?

Clearly, everyone knows they look like apes, and the issue that liberals have is that you shouldn’t point that out, because it’s mean.

Now, the chickens are coming home to roost for Charles Darwin himself.

Daily Mail:

The Natural History museum is conducting a review into potentially ‘offensive’ collections including its Charles Darwin exhibitions.

In the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, museum bosses have ordered an audit into certain collections that some staff believe are ‘legacies of colonies, slavery and empire’.

Rooms, statues and collected items in the museum that could be ‘problematic’ may be renamed, relabelled, or removed.

The review into the museum’s links to slavery and colonialism could result in a potential overhaul of the museum’s collections and public spaces.

In documents seen by The Sunday Telegraph, museum staff were told that as a result of the Black Lives Matter protests, the museum would undertake a review of room names, statues and collections that ‘could potentially cause offence’.

The executive board of the Natural History museum is said to be ‘very engaged’ with the issue and circulated an academic paper to staff which claimed ‘science, racism, and colonial power were inherently entwined‘.

The paper proposes publicly acknowledging the past to create ‘less racist’ museums.

Collections under review include specimens of exotic birds gathered by naturalist Charles Darwin on his expedition to the Galapagos Island with Captain Robert FitzRoy on HMS Beagle in 1835.

I’m not personally the biggest believer in the theory of Darwinian evolution myself. Even with my skepticism, however, my biggest issue with it has always been that there isn’t any open debate. You’re not allowed to discuss it critically in universities, and the federal government effectively says that not teaching children that Darwinian evolution is a fact in public school is a violation of the Constitutional separation of church and state.

What I would want to see with the theory of evolution is what I want to see everywhere: free and open inquiry, and public debate. That is the opposite of tearing down museum exhibits because they offend people. I don’t think this should happen to any idea or theory, ever. Everything should be open. Allowing the free flow of ideas is the single and only path to enlightenment.

It should be extremely disturbing to see open attacks on science. Because you can tear down Darwin exhibits, sure. But if you’ve decided that “science is racist,” then it’s not going to be long before you have a situation where things stop working. Our society requires science to function.

Communism is defined by regressiveness: the society moves backward.

That is what we are seeing everywhere now.

The society is moving backwards, literally devolving, and that is being cheered on by the entire establishment, primarily the media and the government.

Mark Henderson.

At least the roads are safer now.

4029TV:

A Milwaukee man ran from an accident scene, hid in the bushes, and ended up freezing to death, according to a report released Wednesday by the Milwaukee County Medical Examiner’s office.

Mark Henderson, 34, blew a red light at 99th and Good Hope around 2 p.m. on December 30th causing a four car crash. Henderson ran from the scene and hid in the bushes from police.

His body was found the next day by his girlfriend and the homeowner near North 97th and Good Hope Road. The medical examiner report said Henderson was lying between a shed and wooden fence.

A journey into science begins.  A Penn State study has “found” that all of us are descended from a single human who lived 10,000 years ago, somewhere between India and the Middle East.

I’m not particularly expert in the field of genetics, but clearly, this is a very bold statement which probably lacks a solid foundation.

Though it would, to some extent, make sense if we just showed up just before civilization began (unless of course you believe the Atlantis theory, in which case civilization and thus White people are much older; full disclosure: I believe the Atlantis theory).  It would not make sense, however, that the color of our skin is what enables us to build glorious civilizations.

From Irish Central:

A major new US study at Penn State University has found that Europeans’ light skin stems from a gene mutation from a single person who lived 10,000 years ago.

Scientists made the discovery after identifying a key gene that contributes to lighter skin color in Europeans.

[…]

Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5 is a key contributor to the skin color difference between Europeans and West Africans. This is undoubtedly where the Irish get their light skin from.

‘The mutation in SLC24A5 changes just one building block in the protein, and contributes about a third of the visually striking differences in skin tone between peoples of African and European ancestry,’ he said.

They studied segments of genetic code that have a mutation and are located closely on the same chromosome and are often inherited together.

The mutation, called A111T, is found in virtually every one of European ancestry.

A111T is also found in populations in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent, but not in high numbers in Africans.

I can’t say that I dislike the idea that we all shared an ancestor just 10,000 years ago.  We are brothers and sisters.

The fact that it is borderline illegal to talk about race as more than skin color makes the topic rather impotent.  Especially when many Asians, Koreans in particular, have the same skin tone we have –

– and I don’t think anyone is arguing that this is because we mixed with the Koreans – Arabs and Indians got their light skin as a result of miscegenation, but Koreans are a completely separate race.

Oh, but Dr. Cheng is arguing something, says the Daily Mail:

The pattern of people with this lighter skin colour mutation suggests that the A111T mutation occurred somewhere between the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent.

‘This means that Middle Easterners and South Indians, which includes most inhabitants of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, share significant ancestry,’ Professor Cheng said.

This mutated segment of DNA was itself created from a combination of two other mutated segments commonly found in Eastern Asians – traditionally defined as Chinese, Japanese and Korean.

‘The coincidence of this interesting form of evidence of shared ancestry of East Asians with Europeans, within this tiny chromosomal region, is exciting,’ said Professor Cheng.

‘The combining of segments occurred after the ancestors of East Asians and Europeans split geographically more than 50,000 years ago; the A111T mutation occurred afterward.’

So we became White because we mutated the same as the Asians?  Or we mutated from Asians?

And who decided that we split with the East Asians 50,000 years ago?  It seems that would be an archaeological issue, as surely geneticists are not claiming to be able to date the time of mutations.  This is an ongoing problem with the highly specialized nature of modern science – experts in any given field are required to simply take experts from other fields at their word, as they themselves are too wrapped up in their own area of discipline to know what is going on in the other sciences.  Anyway, archeology is a science I have found to be generally lacking; carbon dating appears to be about as accurate as Jew psychiatrist brain-scan voodoo.

The theory of Darwinian evolution, in itself, has many issues which I have yet to see properly explained.

It is most regrettable that all of our sciences are regulated by the Jews.

In a recent piece I wrote on Darwinism, we had a bit of debate going on.  Which is fine.  People have a right to believe as they wish.  Surely, we have more pressing matters at hand.

Here you can witness William Dembski destroy the nerdy Holocaust-confirming troll Michael Shermer.

Shermer claims he is not a Jew.  You be the judge.

Dembski’s theory of “specified complexity” is yet to be disproved.

Because Shermer isn’t really qualified to debate the topic,  in the interest of being fair and balanced, here is the explanation from a top expert on why intelligent design is wrong.

Note that he isn’t talking about the scientific theory of intelligent design.  Pop atheists don’t really do that.  He is instead talking about genitalia how you can’t breath in outer space.

Speaking of outer space, how do you all feel about the theory that we originated from there?

A recent Pew Survey has shown that one in three Americans does not believe in the theory of Darwinian evolution.

From USA Today:

The Pew Research Religion & Public Life Project report released Monday found that 33% think “humans and other living things have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.” Sixty percent agreed with evolution.

Among those who agree with human evolution, about half attribute it to “natural processes such as natural selection.” Whereas, 24% of adults say “a supreme being guided the evolution of living things.”

The survey also found disagreement across political and religious lines.

Among white evangelical Protestants, 64% say that humans have existed in their present form since the beginning of time. The survey found that half of black Protestants responded the same way. Whereas 78% of white mainline Protestants say that humans and other living things have evolved over time.

Seventy-six percent of the religiously unaffiliated, 68% of white non-Hispanic Catholics and 53% of Hispanic Catholics agreed with evolution.

Republicans are less likely to say humans evolved compared to Democrats or independents, Less than half of conservatives or 43% agreed with evolution compared to 67% of liberals and 65% of independents.

The survey is based on telephone interviews conducted March 21-April 8, 2013, with a national sample of 1,983 adults. The margin of error for the results is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

There you have it.

I don’t personally have strong feelings either way, though I know a lot of readers do.

For me, it doesn’t really relate to my core values or beliefs. It seems rather unlikely, if not outright silly, to imagine animals just changing into other animals magically, but nor do I really think it makes sense to take the Book of Genesis as purely literal either. I like the way that William Pierce frames evolution as the Creator guiding the development of Creation. Ultimately, I do not believe that it is possible that life could have come about without divine will, so the question becomes rather academic.

What I am against is the current situation, where the liberal establishment feels it has a secular-divine mandate to force nihilism on the people via the education system, and then bully all who disagree with low-level name-calling and personal ridicule.

Remember when Dawkins told everyone who didn’t agree with him to “fuck off”?

What a weirdo, right?

Well, he’s the only prominent atheist celebrity that isn’t a Jew.  Sam Harris is a Jew, and fat dead Hitchens was a super-Jew.  Clearly, Darwinism is a key element of the nihilistic atheist movement, but it is really only being used by this movement for their own Jew purposes.  Darwin himself appears to have been an interesting and interested White man.  Though possibly misguided.

Whatever the case, it is utterly nonsensical to claim that Darwinian evolution is a science, when it can’t be tested.  And obviously, it can’t be tested, ever.

It definitely shows positively on the American soul that so many of us are able to oppose this reigning doctrine, even with it having been forced down on us for so long.