danny masterson – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png danny masterson – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Danny Masterson Court Sketch is the Best Meme Face Since Smugler https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/12/danny-masterson-court-drawing-is-the-best-meme-face-since-smugler/ Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000 ATTENTION – OFFICIAL MEME ANNOUNCEMENT

I read the latest Danny Masterson news every day. There is a bit of a backlash, with people coming out and saying that sentencing a guy to live in prison for alleged date rapes that were not reported until 14 years after they allegedly occurred is a bit extreme.

A lot of people feel like even if this guy did have sex with drunk bitches after they passed out at his house, and they reported it the next day, and proved that it happened, that isn’t a crime at all. People think that sluts shouldn’t get drunk and pass out at the houses of guys they are not planning to have sex with.

The fact that the thing was not reported for 14 years, and then they sentenced the dude to life in prison, creates a situation where it is difficult to believe it is even real. I think a lot of people are hearing this news and it just doesn’t process in their brains because it is so unbelievable.

Anyway, been reading a lot – and I somehow missed this court drawing:

Look at his face, as the woman fake-cries, there’s a woman judge, four woman jurors (including one wearing a virus hoax muzzle):

Oh Lord, Sweet Jesus, do I know that feeling.

Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me – I know that feeling.

Frankly, this Masterson court face is the best face I’ve seen since the “Smugler” child Hitler drawing.

It really tells the whole story.

Just look at it:

Is that not all of us, in this vagina society?

That bitch is now responding to people claiming this is too extreme.

NBC News:

One of the two women “That ’70s Show” star Danny Masterson was convicted of raping told NBC News on Monday that the 30 years-to-life sentence the judge imposed on the actor “seemed like justice to me.”

In her first public words since Masterson was sentenced last week, the woman who was identified at the actor’s trials as Jane Doe #1 said the penalty that Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Charlaine Olmedo announced “was what the law required.”

“I didn’t think it was outrageous,” she said in telephone interviews. “It was nothing extra and nothing less.”

Jane Doe #1 also praised Olmedo for reminding Masterson that “you are not the victim here.”

But he is literally the victim. He is the one going to prison for the rest of his life based on rumors about something that supposedly happened 20 years ago (which wouldn’t even be a real crime if it was true).

“The judge’s words when she addressed him were amazing,” she said. “That was optional and she chose to. … I felt heard. I really felt heard by her words to him.”

Yes.

I’m sure having your own narcissism vindicated on the world stage made you feel really happy.

Conversely, every normal heterosexual male on earth felt that this was a direct personal attack on them. So unless women’s feelings are more important than men’s feelings, we should really be considering how this lunatic sentence makes men feel – especially given that the judge was a woman, pushing a vaginal agenda.

Men are clearly totally powerless in this society, and totally oppressed.

Of course, we can’t say that, because we are systematically being silenced.

]]> Ashton Kutcher and His Wife Release Hostage Type Apology Video for Supporting Childhood Friend Danny Masterson https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/10/ashton-kutcher-and-his-wife-release-hostage-type-apology-video-for-supporting-childhood-friend-danny-masterson/ Sun, 10 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000

Previously:

“That 70s Show” Actor Sentenced to 30-to-Life for “Rape” That Allegedly Occurred 20 Years Ago (Good, long article if you missed it)

Danny Masterson’s Wife and Friends Defend Him, Plead for Leniency

Danny Masterson was sentenced to life in prison over an alleged “rape” that occurred 20 years ago last week. Two women alleged that they were drunk at his house and he had sex with them, even though they didn’t really want to.

Many of his friends wrote letters asking for leniency, including Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis. Kutcher and Kunis are now married, and they all appeared together on the sitcom “That 70s Show” in the 1990s and early 2000s.

Other members of the cast and other friends of Masterson also wrote letters supporting him (including the dad from the show who was also the bad guy in Robocop 2). However, Kutcher and Kunis were viciously targeted. Unsurprisingly, they released a groveling apology video for defending their friend.

I’ve already written two articles on the Masterson situation, and don’t really have anything more to say on it right now. I will probably have more to say in the future, as the situation develops. I suspect that I might not be the only one who thinks sentencing a man to life in prison based purely on the testimony of supposed victims regarding events that allegedly happened 20 years ago is pushing the limits.

Obviously, our legal system used to require evidence to convict someone of a crime, but rape/consent law, driven by Jews, has changed the entire structure of the legal system.

When the Nazis were put on trial at Nuremberg for “the Holocaust” and there was no physical evidence of any crime presented, with the court relying entirely on totally outrageous claims from the Jews, legal scholars wrote that it was a threat to the entire Western legal order. They were assured that this sort of thing would never happen in a normal court. These new rape trial standards that judges have begun allowing now bring the standard of the Nuremberg Trials to the American legal system.

Imagine if a woman said she saw you murder someone twenty years ago, and originally decided to report it to the police 5 years ago. There is no evidence you murdered anyone, and there is no body, but the woman says you did it. The prosecutor’s office brings it to a judge and a judge allows it. The woman then goes on the stage and cries, talking about how terrible this murder you committed was. The judge then tells the jury that because there is no evidence, no body, no anything, you should just consider whether you believe the crying woman, and decide whether or not to convict based on how her emotional performance made you feel.

The Masterson is exactly the same as that.

Obviously, there can’t be evidence in a “date rape” case, as you would have a dead body as evidence of a murder. But that’s the point. This entire “drunk sex can be rape” concept is nonsensical. People do a lot of things when they are drunk that they regret. The solution to that is to either not get drunk at all, or to not get drunk around people you don’t want to have sex with. Because, I would assert, that if a man and a woman are alone together drinking alcohol, as they continue to drink, sex becomes virtually inevitable.

Men have regrets about this too.

As the old song goes: “I’ve never gone to bed with an ugly woman, but I’ve sure woke up with a few.”

This is not something that it is possible for the state to regulate. “Rape” has traditionally had to involve violence. It is classified as a form of assault. Therefore, at the very least, the woman needs to have bruises to show (but that can be faked, or the result of “consensual” sex).

Basically, this is the thing: sex used to be regulated through Christian standards. Women didn’t just go around having sex with random men. If a woman did have sex with a random man, she was considered a whore. And this included ending up in situations where she’s drunk and alone with a man at his house, and “I didn’t really want to do it but I was drunk.” The assumption was that only a whore would be in that situation, and therefore she was asking for it.

With women’s liberation, they had to create a new system to regulate sex, so they came up with this concept of “consent.” But “consent” is not definable. It is an ambiguous spook. They say “no means no,” but anyone with any sexual experience at all knows that isn’t true, and if you take that at face value, women will think you’re totally pathetic. Human sexual behavior can’t fit into this framework.

If you had sex with a 14-year-old girl in 1920, either she was a whore or you were going to be socially forced into marrying her. Now, they say a 14-year-old girl is “incapable of giving consent.” So even if she wanted to do it, there was no “consent.” The term can mean anything.

They have to invent these little tricks to manage the fact that we are living in a totally unnatural society, which has veered from the basic norms of human behavior.

If women are running around, getting drunk, going to random men’s houses, they are going to end up having sex with men. Some of those events they may regret. Maybe they’ll regret it 15 or more years later. This is not something the state can manage. Sexual behavior is simply too personal for the state to regulate.

Kidnapping is already a crime. Assault is already a crime. If a woman gets drunk at your house and you beat her up, she can go to the cops with her injuries and they will probably be able to prove you beat her up. You’ll be charged for a crime.

But sex, when there is no injury, it’s just “oh but I didn’t like it” – you can’t make laws around that.

These laws they are doing now are designed to shut down human reproductive behavior, to cripple men, to outlaw heterosexuality.

This is the video they are spreading to show that Ashton Kutcher is a really bad guy, by the way:

Seems to me like a normal teenager living in a society that celebrates promiscuity.

But hey – I grew up in the 1990s.

I don’t understand any of this stuff.

]]> Danny Masterson’s Wife and Friends Defend Him, Plead for Leniency https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/09/danny-mastersons-wife-and-friends-defend-him-plead-for-leniency/ Sat, 09 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000

More than 50 people wrote to the judge in the Danny Masterson sexual assault trial to support the convicted actor ahead of his sentencing, including:

Ashton Kutcher
Mila Kunis
Debra Jo Rupp
Kurtwood Smith
Alanna Masterson
Christopher Masterson
Jordan Masterson
Billy Baldwin… pic.twitter.com/FWpIYcHgHh

— Variety (@Variety) September 8, 2023

Previously: “That 70s Show” Actor Sentenced to 30-to-Life for “Rape” That Allegedly Occurred 20 Years Ago

Celebrities did no go to bat for Harvey Weinstein. His own brother threw him under the bus.

Harvey was quite possibly the least popular person on earth.

That is another escalation in the case of this Masterson case. He’s not a repulsive troll, and he’s got all these people defending him.

If this was the first case of “if a woman says you raped her decades, you’re guilty,” it wouldn’t work. Harvey had to set the precedent – he was a guy no one would defend.

Now, the precedent is set, and young, normal, handsome Scientologists are going to prison forever on fake rape charges.

New York Post:

Danny Masterson’s wife Bijou Phillips told a judge she and their young daughter are “heartbroken” over his rape conviction in a pre-sentencing support letter.

Hoping to lobby Judge Charlaine Olmedo to opt for a lighter term, Phillips characterized her 47-year-old spouse as a caring husband and father who scrambled to make a living after he was accused and later convicted of violent rapes.

“I can say that Danny has literally been a life-saving partner to me,” she wrote.

Phillips told Olmedo — who hit the “That 70s Show” star with a maximum sentence of two consecutive 15-year terms Thursday — Masterson developed a farm and vineyard after his career cratered.

“After he lost his show and acting career, he devoted himself to finding other ways to earn a living,” she wrote.

Bijou Phillips

“He took classes to learn about growing grapes, wines and he became a sommelier,” she said. “He also studied the business end of it.”

(A sommelier is a wineryist. Sort of archaic term there.)

Echoing support letters from Masterson’s co-stars Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher, Phillips stressed he was opposed to drugs and “never smoked a joint in his life.”

Despite the temptations of Hollywood, Masterson attempted to warn other actors of the perils of drug abuse and served as a role model, she said.

Yeah, he seems like a good guy, in Hollywood terms.

No doubt that’s part of why he’s going down.

He probably pissed off some Jews. The Scientologists have done this several times.

His absence, she said, will decimate their family — especially his nine-year-old child, Fianna.

“Our daughter and I are heartbroken that he is not home with us,” she wrote. “It has been very difficult without him here. Even though he is now in jail, he calls her every day. He helps her with homework every night. He teaches her math with kindness and patience.”

Phillips acknowledged the severity of the crimes Masterson was convicted of, but pleaded with Olmedo to take their family circumstances into account when meting out his fate.

“We need him more than you can imagine,” she said. “I know he has been convicted of serious crimes. But the man I married has only been an extraordinary husband to me and a devoted father to our daughter.”

She married him in 2011, so ten years after he was alleged to have committed these rapes.

It’s just so crazy to even think about that – he’s been married and had kids and lived a whole life, long after the alleged crimes were even alleged.

Unlike his wife, these co-stars have no reason to vouch for him – other than that they legitimately care about him and this this is bullshit.

They are getting attacked over this.

It’s a big deal to go out and “defend a convicted rapist” like this.

I have big respect for Kutcher and Kunis after this. It shows they have real character.

Honestly, this case could lead to something of a backlash.

People don’t really understand how insane this rape hoaxing has gotten.

With Harvey Weinstein, they were talking about like, he was engaged in this organized “casting couch” thing, and the public viewed it that this was what he was being convicted of. In fact, he was convicted (the first time) of “raping” his girlfriend, based on her claims that that happened. She admitted that they had sex that was “not rape” before that, at for years after that. But one day they were hanging out and he just raped her. She admitted she didn’t try to resist, and didn’t even tell him she didn’t want to have sex, but that she didn’t want it in her heart, so it was rape.

It was totally insane. But I think the people who weren’t following it didn’t understand.

With this Masterson case, it is just obviously insane. They’re saying he raped two women in 2003, at his house. They claim they don’t remember it. They are saying “I don’t remember what happened.” They claim he must have drugged them, but even if this was all just how they are remembering it, there is no possible way for even them to know if he “raped” them while they were passed out (that isn’t actually rape), or if they got drunk and “consented” and then forgot (because they were blacked out drunk).

These women didn’t report it until 2017.

There would be no way to find evidence of this crime the next day – when everyone was drunk and didn’t remember what happened, it’s all just theoretical.

I think people are in shock over this life sentence. It’s just… honestly, it’s hard for me to even put into words.

You should read the thing I wrote yesterday about this if you missed it.

Pomidor Quixote contributed to this article. 

]]> “That 70s Show” Actor Sentenced to 30-to-Life for “Rape” That Allegedly Occurred 20 Years Ago https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/08/that-70s-show-actor-sentenced-to-30-to-life-for-rape-that-allegedly-occurred-20-years-ago/ Fri, 08 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000

This is why they locked Danny Masterson up pic.twitter.com/JrsGQUiGRE

— Alia Dax (@AliaTheReycist) September 8, 2023

I told you all in 2020, when the Harvey Weinstein sentence came down, that there was no possible thing that was impossible in terms of rape hoaxing.

Since that verdict, we’ve seen exactly what I foresaw: a lunatic push to effectively outlaw heterosexual sex. Anyone can now be targeted. It’s happening all over the country, and no one knows it’s happening because most of the people it is happening to are not celebrities.

Three and a half years after the Weinstein sentence, which was based entirely on “eye-witness testimony” (what I have called “the Nuremberg Standard of Rape”), we now have another celebrity case. The Danny Masterson case is even more extreme than the Weinstein case. There is again zero evidence beyond the claims of the women, and it is an even longer timeframe.

See: Nuremberg Standard: If a Woman Says You Raped Her, You’re Going to Jail Despite Lack of Evidence

This new standard for rape convictions is “do you believe the women???” Of course, the slogan is “believe all women,” so if you don’t believe the women, you’re evil.

The thing here is: even if the women think they were raped, they are talking about something that happened 20 years ago, which they did not report until 2017 – 14 years after the thing allegedly happened.

You cannot prove a rape happened that long after the fact. In reality, when you are talking about “yeah I was at his house drunk and then I passed out and he raped me” – you can’t prove it even immediately after the event. This sort of thing has always been outside of the historical definition of “rape.” No one used to ever even be charged for this, ever – let alone 20 years later.

If you are a woman alone in a man’s house drinking at night, he doesn’t use violence but has sex with you without permission – this cannot be a crime. It doesn’t make sense, because there can never be proof.

But it is a crime, under the democracy system of total brutality. And they will sentence you to live in prison.

RT:

Danny Masterson, the American actor best known for playing the character Steven Hyde on the long-running US sitcom ‘That 70s Show’, was imprisoned on Thursday for 30 years to life following his conviction in May for the rape of two women in his Los Angeles home 20 years ago.

Los Angeles superior court Judge Charlaine Olmedo issued Masterson, 47, with two terms of 15 years to be served consecutively. Masterson’s lawyers failed in a bid to hold a new trial, as well as to have the two convictions run concurrently.

“Mr. Masterson, you are not the victim here,” Judge Olmedo said in court after hearing emotional statements from the women at the center of the case. “Your actions 20 years ago took away another person’s choice and voice. Your actions 20 years ago today were criminal, and that’s why you are here.”

It’s definitely not a coincidence that this hearing happened on the 20th anniversary of the alleged rapes.

This is intended to make a statement that no matter how much time has passed, you will go to prison forever if some woman decides she doesn’t like you.

In May, a jury found Masterson guilty of two counts of rape following seven days of deliberation. A verdict could not be reached on a third count which alleged that Masterson had also raped a former girlfriend.

During the trial, the two victims testified that they were given drinks by Masterson at his Hollywood-area home in 2003, after which they passed out or became woozy before he violently sexually assaulted them. The attacks took place at the height of his fame on the Fox sitcom ‘That 70s Show’, in which Masterson was a central character between 1998 and 2006.

“You relish in hurting women,” one of the women said, addressing Masterson in court on Thursday as part of a victim impact statement. “It is your addiction. It is without question your favorite thing to do.”

Throughout the trial, prosecutors had argued that Masterson had used his status as a prominent member of the Church of Scientology to avoid accountability for his actions. The three women – who were all members of the church at the time – each testified in court that they had been discouraged from notifying police by figures in the church.

In a statement, the Church of Scientology said it had “no policy prohibiting or discouraging members from reporting criminal conduct of anyone – Scientologists or not – to law enforcement.”

So, there’s that.

There’s the thing.

You know: people say of me “Anglin tells his followers to not even interact with women!”

Here’s the thing: what am I supposed to tell my readers?

A lot of people respect me, and look to me for guidance. I have a responsibility.

Other people on the internet tell men they are losers if they don’t have girlfriends/wives.

I don’t do that. I stick up for my readers, and stick up for all men.

I say the fact: in the modern order of dating and marriage, someone who is successful is somehow who is able to earn the approval of women. If women do not approve of you, that is not a bad thing. In fact, it’s probably a good sign. Women have horrible taste, and in the current year, have sex with the most worthless men in society (blacks, immigrants, drug dealers, internet celebrities, men on steroids, men with tattoos, Hollywood film actors, etc.).

I keep it real.

Men obviously want women. I understand this. But I don’t have a solution to the issue.

Women probably do not want you if you are a normal, healthy male. If you do find a woman who seems legit, there is a very high chance she will dump you, steal your money and kids, and completely ruin you forever.

Here’s the thing: there are very few women who are attractive in this society. Most of them are fat. Most, most. So if you find an attractive woman, she has huge numbers of options. Maybe you’re the best man in the world. That really doesn’t matter, because she is going to make decisions based on her subjective view of you in comparison to other men. She may also simply get bored with you, and not really care about even the subjective quality of another man, but simply leave you because another man seems “fun” – and as we all know, “fun” leads to “happiness.” (A woman’s “happiness” rating is the collective sum of her fun quotient.)

Just for the record, these men were all divorce raped:

  • Vladimir Putin
  • Brad Pitt
  • Jeff Bezos
  • Donald Trump
  • Johnny Depp
  • Elon Musk
  • Bill Gates
  • Justin Trudeau
  • Ben Affleck
  • Kanye West
  • Donald Trump Jr.
  • Tom Cruise

And you can just keep going. If you think you are higher value than the men who are objectively the highest value men on earth, then you are insane. If you think you are more clever than all these men, you are delusional. Seriously, if you think that, you have something very wrong with you.

This is the reality. It’s the objective truth.

Now, we’re adding this lunatic rape hoaxing onto the pile, where you can be charged with rape based on no evidence. Any woman you ever had sex with can do this to you. They do not require evidence, and there is no evidence you can present that will clear your name. (Harvey Weinstein had texts from the accuser saying “I love you” and “I miss you” days and years after the alleged rape.)

This is a minefield.

In order to successfully breed in the US (and much of the rest of the West), you have to:

  • Become the kind of man that women like (assuming you are not extraordinarily handsome, wealthy, or famous, this means you have to totally change who you are and become a total faggot/scumbag to please women)
  • Hope she doesn’t divorce-rape you
  • Hope she doesn’t rape hoax you

The odds are very much stacked against you.

What I’ve said is this: there is no shame in not playing that game.

I’ve never ordered anyone to not engage women. I’ve just given the facts on the reality of that situation.

The people who criticize me on this issue are telling me to lie. They will not disagree with me on any of the facts, they will just say that I have a bad attitude and this is not good for my readers.

Well, lying to my readers is what I think would not be good.

The male sex drive is incredible (or it should be, I don’t know about now with all of these plastics). Nothing I say is going to prevent men from engaging with women if they want to do that. A lot of readers have girlfriends and wives – I don’t tell them to break-up or get divorced. I am all for men figuring out what they can figure out.

What I am not going to do is give you some kind of strategy to get a good girlfriend/wife, and act like it will work. Maybe 5-10 years ago I would have done that. But at this point, things are so bad out there, that telling guys “oh you just have to do X” would make me a fiend.

If people want “instructions on how to get a girlfriend,” there are dozens of figures on the internet who do this bit. Usually, it starts with “be rich and famous like me.” They won’t say it like that, but if some guy in a Bugatti is telling you “you can get women, just like I do,” you need to pause and ask yourself if that makes sense.

The best I can tell you: pray about it.

Maybe God will have mercy on you.

Women are not going to have mercy on you, and putting yourself at their mercy is not going to turn out well.

 

]]> The Mars Volta Singer Accuses Scientology of Poisoning His Dog Again https://www.anglinarchive.com/2020/01/25/the-mars-volta-singer-accuses-scientology-of-poisoning-his-dog-again/ Sat, 25 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0000 Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 25, 2020

I assume Scientologists probably actually do this stuff.

They function the same as Jews or Mormons. It’s actually the only way to survive in this multicultural hell – you have to be in an extremist cult.

Stereogum:

Cedric Bixler-Zavala of the Mars Volta and At The Drive-In had to put down his family dog yesterday after she ate rat poison, and he says that Scientologists protecting That ’70s Show actor Danny Masterson were behind it. In 2017, Bixler-Zavala’s wife Chrissie Carnell Bixler accused Masterson of raping her while they were dating in the late ’90s. Several other women have also made similar accusations against Masterson, who has denied all the allegations. Bixler-Zavala and Carnell Bixler are both former Scientologists; Masterson is currently an active member of the Church Of Scientology.

Loudwire reports that Bixler-Zavala, Carnell Bixler, and other accusers filed a lawsuit against Masterson and the Church Of Scientology last August for stalking and harassing them in an attempt to silence the allegations. “I’m at the vet dealing with another hurt animal,” Bixler-Zavala wrote on Instagram this week alongside a photograph of rat poison rolled up in raw meat. “This is what I’ve been finding in my front and backyard. This is what scientology does when you speak about the predators they protect … This is the 2nd dog we’ve had to put down due to the harassment from private investigators and Scientologists. This only makes us stronger. “

Here are all his posts on the topic of Danny Masterson poisoning his dog and raping his wife.

That sucks.

I hate to hear about dogs dying.

And Cedric is probably a nice guy.

I liked The Mars Volta of course, but At the Drive-In really made an impression on me when I was in those developmental teenage years.

Great stuff.

He sure did get fat though.

He just looks like a fat Mexican slob.

Did you know: he played in a band with Beto O’Rourke?

True story.

Being a fat Mexican slob is at least better than being Beto O’Rourke.

It’s funny that Scientology will kill dogs to defend Danny Masterson’s honor but they can’t get him (or his wife) a single role in a movie or a show.

Like, have you even ever seen that guy after That ’70s Show?

]]> Grope Report: Danny Masterson, MSNBC Jew Sam Seder, Tom Hanks? https://www.anglinarchive.com/2017/12/06/grope-report-danny-masterson-msnbc-jew-sam-seder-tom-hanks/ Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0000 Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
December 6, 2017

[GROPING INTENSIFIES]

Welcome to the Grope Report, always bringing you the latest in grope, rape and bitch-grabbing related news.

Today, just like every other day before it, we have some exciting new developments in the grope scene.

First up is “The Ranch” star Danny Masterson who, true to his name, has been alleged to have “mastered” a couple of sluts 20 odd years ago [Editor’s note: “Mastered them with his dick” is the joke here. -AA].

Entertainment Weekly:

Netflix is ending its relationship with The Ranch star Danny Masterson amid rape allegations against the actor, the streaming service announced Tuesday.

“As a result of ongoing discussions, Netflix and the producers have written Danny Masterson out of The Ranch,” a Netflix spokesperson said. “Yesterday was his last day on the show, and production will resume in early 2018 without him.”

His days of mastering bitches are over.

Masterson responded to the news in a statement provided to Huffington Post by his attorney: “I am obviously very disappointed in Netflix’s decision to write my character off of The Ranch. From day one, I have denied the outrageous allegations against me. I have never been charged with a crime, let alone convicted of one.”

This past March, three women told the Los Angeles police department that Masterson sexually assaulted them in the early 2000s, PEOPLE reported. Masterson denied the allegations.

That’s too bad, Danny. Don’t you know the alpha way of dealing with rape allegations?

You gotta roll with the punches, bro.

Next up!

Explosive allegations regarding Tom Hanks!

Is the bitch lying?

Who knows! Probably!

But the thing about #MeTooism is that it manifestly doesn’t matter whether the accuser is lying or not. All that matters is how much of a chad the guy being accused is.

So, Tom, do you want to do this like the filthy kike Weinstein and admit to jacking off in ficus plants? Or will you take it like a Roy Moore and embrace bitch-grabbing?

He’s got my vote, I can tell you that.

Next, we have a very special entry.

This one sets a new precedent, and it’s very good news for the future of our Grope Report show. It seems like making light of someone else’s grabbing antics – even if said joke was years ago – is now just as bad as doing the grabbing yourself, and is a firing offense.

Exciting!

AV Club:

In a year that has already seen it come under fire for passing on Ronan Farrow’s domino-tumbling expose of Harvey Weinstein, as well as for letting Matt Lauer run rampant across decades of pay raises, NBC is at last taking a principled stand against media figures who propagate sexual assault—and naturally, completely bungling that as well. As The Wrap reports, MSNBC has just cut ties with contributor Sam Seder over a tweet he wrote in 2009, a joke that sarcastically mocked Hollywood’s continued defense of director Roman Polanski on artistic grounds. “Don’t care re Polanski, but I hope if my daughter is ever raped it is by an older truly talented man w/a great sense of mise en scene,” that tweet read, a response written to the petition urging Polanski’s release from a brief arrest in Switzerland, largely because he is “one of the greatest contemporary filmmakers.” Because of this eight-year-old dig at the film industry’s morals—and the fact that “internally there was disgust over the tweet,” as a source tells The Wrap—Seder’s contract with the network will not be renewed.

To be fair, Jew, it was a good joke. I hope you have a happy life now that you’re on the sex offender list.

Better make sure you didn’t tweet eight year ago about someone else doing rape – that’s a big no no.

So now the new standard is both retroactive and vicarious: if you’ve ever made a comment about anyone else doing the groping, you’re basically unemployable.

Can anyone meet this new standard for not being a rapist? Probably not!

So I guess they should just fire everyone and just be done with it. But what am I saying? Then I wouldn’t have the joy of bringing your your daily dose of rape news!

So yeah, Jew media, if you can just keep disgracing 2-3 guys per day for the next few years, I’d appreciate it.

]]>