Netflix is having a hard time keeping people immersed in diversity. Most of their shows are just anti-white hate material.

It’s a good thing for them that Amazon and Disney are also pushing anti-white hate material.

Niche Gamer:

Streaming has generally been considered a way to conveniently watch shows and movies on-demand without the worry for ads. Netflix has long been an ad-free, premium streaming service, but no longer it seems.

The profitability of services such as Netflix has been called into question, especially after the company posted a significant loss of subscribers, which heavily damaged their stock value earlier this year.

This has led them changing their tune about their stance on ads, which they announced shortly after this event. It would be a tier level where those paying for it would get advertisement while streaming whatever they wanted to watch on Netflix.

At the time of this announcement, it was stated to be coming a week after Disney+ would also be adding their own tier which includes ads. However, it’s now being reported that this new subscription tier will be launching on November 1st this year, to get ahead of their competitor.

Currently Netflix is working with Microsoft in regards to getting this advertisement tier working.

Really aside from anything political, it is amazing that Netflix managed to go from monopoly to struggling to stay afloat so quickly.

It was very bad business.

But a huge part of the reason they did business so badly was their commitment to politics, and that really destroys any notion that companies only exist to make money. If Amazon wanted to, they could have just started making shows for normal people, starting with not doing Lord of the Apes: The Top Cunt of Power.

If they’d done a solid LotR show, everyone who jump on board and leave Netflix. But none of these companies seem to care about making money. The only thing they care about is hating white people.

Or, I guess, they have some kind of blood pact, where they compete inside of the framework of all agreeing to only make anti-white shows. But people seem to be canceling all of these services. For the time-being, they can still watch people on YouTube making fun of them.

The Nerdrotic YouTube show did a 2 hour stream reviewing Rings of Power, and it got nearly 600,000 views.

That’s probably more people than watched the show.

But eventually, all of that content is getting banned as well.

I remember watching Nerdrotic during the coronavirus hoax, and he was getting like 10,000 views on streams. So this cultural content has blown up as everyone else is getting banned – for whatever reason, you’re still allowed to go on YouTube and say “this show sucks, it’s all just black people and women and the writing is garbage because it was written by black people and women.”

But they are going to ban all those people soon enough, and you’re only option for something to do will be to watch anti-white hate materials.

Recently, the film “Cuties,” a French pedophile film distributed by Netflix, received much criticism for being a pedophile film. Netflix actually had charges brought against them in Texas for distributing child pornography.

The film features 10 and 11 year old girls doing sexual dances.

Related: Netflix Sees Drop in Subscriptions as People Protest Pedophile-Positive Film “Cuties”

I had to check it myself to believe it, but at time of writing, if you type “Cuties” into Google, the description they give is pornographic.

It reads: “We test each one of these beautiful girls and see how far they can go before they gag during their audition!”

Although the film features highly controversial outfits and gyrating by the preteen girls, it does not include oral sex, which would be highly illegal. Yet someone wrote this in the description.

This is in the sidebar, which is officially moderated by Google. It isn’t some random thing pulled off of a website. Someone at Google has to have included this description in the results.

Why would they do that?

This is going around Twitter and will most likely have been changed by the time you read this. But I can pretty well guarantee you that Google will not offer any explanation as to how it happened in the first place.

Wait wait wait – he’s surprised about censorship? In the single most censored society ever?

These people are actually trying to drive us all insane with their bullshit.

RT:

Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos is taken aback that anyone would seek to censor ‘Cuties,’ saying the film – called “child porn” by critics and the subject of a criminal indictment by a Texas grand jury – is just “very misunderstood.”

“It is a film that is very misunderstood with some audiences, uniquely within the United States,”Deadline quoted Sarandos as saying on Monday at the Mipcom online trade show for entertainment content distributors. “The film speaks for itself.”

The statement marked Sarandos’ first public comments on the controversy since a grand jury in Tyler County, Texas last month indicted Netflix for promoting “lewd exhibition” of the genitals or pubic area of underage children. The indictment said the material “appeals to the prurient interest in sex and has no serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.”

Netflix said last week that the charge was “without merit” and that ‘Cuties’ was “social commentary against the sexualization of young children.”

lol.

But lawmakers called for a federal investigation of whether Netflix violated child pornography laws by distributing the film, and Democrat US Representative Tulsi Gabbard said ‘Cuties’ would “whet the appetite of pedophiles and fuel the child sex-trafficking trade.” Republican senator from Texas Ted Cruz, meanwhile, has asked US attorney general to investigate whether Netflix violated federal laws against child pornography. A boycott campaign to cancel Netflix subscriptions erased $8 billion of Netflix’s market value as a publicly traded company in two days.

Sarandos didn’t expect such intense controversy, especially after the film was shown in Europe without much pushback. “It’s a little surprising in 2020 America that we’re having a discussion about censoring storytelling,” he said.

What they do in sexualizing children in this film is actually attempt to trigger sexual attraction to them in normal people who are not attracted to children. They paint the girls’ faces up like women (makeup simulates signs of sexual heat in women), then have them move around sexually like women.

It’s just the same thing they do with trannies. It’s a trick.

It’s an attack on the entirety of basic society.

People are mad.

But the thing is done.

They got backlash.

But the next film will get less backlash.

The one after that will get virtually none.

This is how they do you.

It’s how they did us with homos.

I hate to say it, but pedophilia is naturally less offensive than homosexuality. This is going to be easier. They could have done it at any point if they wanted to, but they instead decided to make this whole “protection of children” thing a moral value as they were destroying all other moral values.

Being against pedophilia was the last moral stand that people were allowed to take.

Now, they’re removing that. And the single thing that will be immoral is joking about the Holocaust.

The other big thing here is this: most of our society is addicted to pornography. Pornography is like drugs in that you need a stronger and stronger dose to get the same dopamine hit from it. The stronger dose is more hardcore and anti-social material. This means in real terms that the addict goes from watching normal heterosexual sex to anal, to BDSM, to blacks-on-blondes, to trannies, and so on and so forth. The last step of course is children. And we would probably be shocked to find out how many people are ready for that.

We don’t know how many people watched Cuties, but I think it’s fair to assume that virtually all of the men who turned it on and watched it all the way through were aroused by it. What other reason would someone have for watching it? The Sarandos explanation – they wanted to learn why the sexualization of children was bad?

People were of course not ready for the full pornofication of prepubescent girls.

But someone had to be the first to promote it.

Netflix is taking one for the satanist team.

Penn Live:

People are cutting the Netflix cord after the platform’s release of the French film, “Cuties.”

According to FOX Business, numbers gained by research firm, YipitData, show a significant increase in users who chose not to renew their subscriptions after the movie’s premiere. The streaming behemoth even saw a 1.3 percent drop in shares on Monday.

“Cuties” (or “Migonnes” in its original French) follows the story of Amy (Fathia Youssouf) who seeks to escape her family’s traditional conservative ways by joining a dance group. While this may sound like a lighthearted coming-of-age story, audiences became outraged over the sexualized nature of the film, particularly that of its core cast of 11-year-old girls.

Those defending the film, including Netflix itself, point to the fact that this sexualization is satirical and intended as a social commentary of how underaged girls are very much put into situations in which their bodies are inappropriately put on display. But many just aren’t buying that excuse, fervently getting behind the “#CancelNetflix” trend.

The cries for pulling “Cuties” from the platform don’t appear to be quieting down any time soon, either. Several petitions calling for the film’s removal have surfaced, each touting between 300,000 and 650,000 signatures as of the writing of this article.

If you feel heartened by the fact that people are not ready for literal pedophilia – please, don’t be.

The people who produced this didn’t think people would be ready for it. This is the beginning of a process of normalization.

They will release other media portraying preteen girls this way. Probably very soon – within the year. When the next thing comes out, the same people who were outraged this time will be outraged. But they will be less outraged. Because that is the process of desensitization.

Eventually, it will be normal, and even those who feel adamant that it is bad will no longer bother to oppose it, because they will psychologically recognize it as normal.

The fact is, pedophilia could have been normalized a long time ago. It could have been normalized and legalized and celebrated instead of homosexuality. The sanctification of “as long as it’s not kids” was arbitrary. The people who planned this social engineering program knew that there had to be some line that people thought was solid, and that was the “sex with children” thing.

You had this angle of “as long as it’s consenting adults,” but it just as easily could have been “as long as it’s a male and a female.” If you went back to the 1900s, people would obviously be much more repulsed by homosexuality than heterosexual pedophilia.

The fact of reality is that this “as long as it’s not kids” line was already crossed totally with the child tranny agenda. Child trannies are significantly worse than the sexualization of preteen girls. Child trannies are already fully normalized.

They have been having preteen little boys, who they claim are homosexuals, dressing up in these sex costumes for years now. “Desmond is Amazing” was 11 years old in 2018, and he danced on stage in a sex outfit while men threw dollar bills at him.

Jazz Jennings was interviewed as a tranny at age 6 by Barbara Walters, all the way back in 2007. He was celebrated all through the media long before he ever hit puberty.

There are many such cases.

I guess this phenomenon didn’t matter as much because they were boys.

It’s frustrating to me that there is such outrage over Cuties, frankly.

Because these people weren’t there when this same thing was being done to boys.

It’s also frustrating that there were apparently people who didn’t think this was going to happen with the girls. I’m sitting here wondering what they thought was going to happen? We were going to have everything in our entire society talking about homosexuality 25 hours a day, have boys being groomed to be trannies from the time they can walk, injected with all of these hormones, dancing at sex clubs – but we would always hold that the innocence of a preteen girl was sacred?

Is that what these people who are outraged over this Cuties film thought?

If they didn’t think that, then why weren’t they already canceling their Netflix subscription because they have a show with with a 9-year-old tranny?

Are you going to try to tell me this doesn’t count as “sexualizing children”?

Dressing a little boy up like a girl and injecting him with female sex hormones?

The Cuties thing bothers me just like it bothers everyone else, but it feels like the only reason it is bothering so many people is that they had this sacred line in their minds, that they imagined some sacred and secret agreement existed with the media that heterosexual pedophilia is a line that wouldn’t be crossed.

It’s a bit like conservatives with the guns, I think. It was okay to destroy every single one of our freedoms, to completely abolish free speech, and now to ban us from attending church – as long as they don’t come for the guns. Guns then became fetishized, and most conservatives weren’t even paying attention when the First Amendment was abolished.

Just so, most conservatives weren’t paying attention when homosexual pedophilia was normalized through the child tranny agenda, but now they’re on alert because heterosexual pedophilia is being normalized.

Do any of these gun fetishists think that a people who couldn’t defend their freedom of speech, a people who obeyed when they were told they were no longer allowed to attend church, are going to be able to hold on to their guns?

This is a society of cowards who refuse to stand up for what is right. So of course, every bad thing is going to happen to them. Because we know who rules here.

Here’s yet another thing you’re going to have to look forward to in your brave and bright new revolutionary future: open pedophilia.

This is the poster for the new French drama released by Netflix entitled “Cuties.”

That poster and the trailer led to a high degree of backlash. Netflix has decided to release the film, but pull the promotional artwork.

Many in the media claimed that the film is actually against sexualizing young girls. Of course, that is incompatible with that poster. It is also incompatible with basic reality that you would make a film focused on showing the sexualization of children but also be against it, unless it was explicitly framed as being against it. “It sends the message it might be bad, while letting the viewer come to his own conclusions” is promoting it with plausible deniability.

I’ve continually argued that the new definition of pedophilia was created in part to normalize actual pedophilia, to put people in a place where they have no ability to defend against actual pedophilia.

For those unaware, the term “pedophilia” traditionally meant “attraction to prepubescent children.” Then it so happened that a bunch of homosexual priests were caught molesting teenage boys. These boys were still underage, but they were not “children.” They were post-pubescent.

They needed an ability to distinguish between bad homosexuals and good homosexual, so they defined the priests who molested the boys as “not homosexuals, but pedophiles,” thereby redefining the term “pedophile” to mean “attraction to people who are under the legal age of consent in your jurisdiction.”

There are homosexual pedophiles. However, most homosexuals are “pederasts” who target boys who are experiencing sexual urges already. The entire goal of the homosexual is to convert the boy to homosexualism. And if he is able to associate early experiences of sexuality with men, then that boy is much more likely to convert to homosexualism.

This new definition of the term meant that thinking 17-year-old Britney Spears looked pretty good on the cover of Rolling Stone in 1999 was now pedophilia in some districts.

It effectively completely removed the value of the term “pedophilia,” and thereby removed the ability of people to identify with language the concept of sexualizing prepubescent children.

The age of consent is a thing, and should be a thing. I do not think we should allow teenagers to go around having sex, and we absolutely shouldn’t allow homosexuals to prey on teenage boys. But we already understood that. We also understood that puberty is a biological process that happens to humans that changes them from children into sexual beings, and that there is not something evil or immoral about having an attraction to a girl who has a fully developed body and yet hasn’t reached the age of consent.

People understand that a teenager is sexual. We were all teenagers once, and we understand that in fact, they are highly sexual, due specifically to this explosion of hormones in their bodies. I’m not a fan of the term “exploring sexuality,” as it always implies promiscuity, which I am opposed to, but people are at least able to understand how such a term applies to teenagers.

But they garbled that all together.

It was only a matter of time before they started targeting prepubescent children for sexualization, under the claim that “children have a right to explore their sexuality.” If someone said, “what do you mean, ‘children have a right to explore their sexuality,'” the response would be, “well, a 16-year-old has an ability to be sexual.”

But they kept on chanting “children have a right to explore their sexuality.”

And then you get this:

You see how this works? When they can remove your ability to use language to describe things, they can manipulate reality around your inability to express yourself.

It’s not a coincidence that this film is being rolled out in the middle of a cultural revolution. We’ve been hearing for years about how we need to relabel pedophiles as “minor attracted persons.” We’ve been hearing that pedophiles are actually victims of society. Slate.com was pushing this line as far back as 2012.

We can see now that the last several decades have been spent grooming the population to prepare for what is happening right now: the great unveiling.

Yes: open, normalized pedophilia (by the original definition of the concept) is going to be a part of the New World Order that we are entering into. It is currently being rolled out as a part of this cultural revolution, and the Netflix film “Cuties” is the big announcement that it’s time for you to get used to it.

An earlier version of this article misidentified “Cuties” as a documentary. It is in fact a drama film, and they hired these little girls to dress-up like whores.