I know blacks are good runners, but is this really necessary?

Do we have to turn over everything we have to these blacks?

Al-Jazeera:

Kemi Badenoch has won the race to become the new leader of the United Kingdom’s Conservative Party, pledging to return it to its founding principles and win back voters after its worst election defeat in July.

Badenoch, 44, came out on top in the two-horse race with former Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick, winning 57 percent of the votes of party members.

She received 53,806 votes, while Jenrick got 41,388 votes from the 131,680 eligible electors. The party placed turnout at 72.8 percent.

Badenoch replaces former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and has pledged to lead the party through a period of renewal, saying it had veered towards the political centre by “governing from the left” and must return to its traditional ideas.

The first Black woman leader of a major political party in the UK, Badenoch said becoming leader was an “enormous honour”, but that “the task that stands before us is tough.”

The combative former equalities minister faces the daunting task of reuniting a divided and weakened party that was emphatically removed from power in July after 14 years in charge.

“We have to be honest about the fact we made mistakes” and “let standards slip”, she said.

“It is time to get down to business, it is time to renew,” she added.

Born in London to Nigerian parents, Badenoch spent her childhood years in Lagos. She became an MP in 2017, and, in 2022, made her first bid for Conservative leader.

With forthright views on everything from what she calls identity politics to the value of officials, Badenoch attracts both strong admirers and detractors.

What kind of people would admire a bitch like this?

Are they mentally retarded?

And just like that, The Age of Men is over.

The Age of Top Cunt and Her Apes has dawned.

Reuters:

The new British Prime Minister Liz Truss has selected a cabinet where for the first time a white man will not hold one of the country’s four most important ministerial positions.

Truss appointed Kwasi Kwarteng – whose parents came from Ghana in the 1960s – as Britain’s first Black finance minister while James Cleverly is the first Black foreign minister.

Kwasi Karteng

James Cleverly

Cleverly, whose mother hails from Sierra Leone and whose father is white, has in the past spoken about being bullied as a mixed-race child and has said the party needs to do more to attract Black voters.

Suella Braverman, whose parents came to Britain from Kenya and Mauritius six decades ago, succeeds Priti Patel as the second ethnic minority home secretary, or interior minister, where she will be responsible for police and immigration.

Suella Braverman

The growing diversity is in part thanks to a push by the Conservative Party in recent years to put forward a more varied set of candidates for parliament.

British governments have until a few decades ago been made up of mostly white men. It took until 2002 for Britain to appoint its first ethnic minority cabinet minister when Paul Boateng was appointed chief secretary to the Treasury.

Rishi Sunak, whose parents came from India, was Kwarteng’s predecessor in the finance job and the runner-up to Truss in the leadership context.

“Politics has set the pace. We now treat it as normal, this diversity,” said Sunder Katwala, director of non-partisan think-tank British Future, which focuses on migration and identity. “The pace of change is extraordinary.”

However, the upper ranks of business, the judiciary, the civil service and army are all still predominately white.

And despite the party’s diversity campaign, only a quarter of Conservative members of parliament are women and 6% from minority backgrounds.

Nevertheless, the Conservatives have the best track record of political firsts among the main political parties, including appointing the first Jewish prime minister in Benjamin Disraeli in 1868.

This is despite the fact ethnic minority voters are much more likely to back the opposition Labour party and the ruling party has faced accusations of racism, misogyny and Islamophobia.

Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson apologised in 2019 for describing Muslim women wearing burqas as looking like letter boxes.

The Conservatives have elected all three of Britain’s female prime ministers, Margaret Thatcher, Theresa May and now Truss. The first lawmaker of Asian descent, Mancherjee Bhownaggree in 1895, also came from the Conservatives.

Johnson assembled the youngest and most ethnically diverse Cabinet in history when he elected prime minister in 2019. His three finance ministers included two men of South Asian origin and one of Kurdish background.

I can see how someone could go along with “okay well, we can allow nonwhites in our country and give them opportunities.”

But saying “actually, we’re replacing white men on purpose – we’re forcing them out and then we’re bragging about it” – that seems like a bridge too far, no?

Nick Fuentes doesn’t need a job. He already has a job. He is the host of a successful political talk show and a pro gamer. The kid is making $100 a minute in superchats on his talk show and $500 on gaming streams.

It’s comical to see how the entire fake conservative establishment has launched a coordinated smear effort against groyper army Supreme Commander Nick Fuentes. They’ve literally tried to recruit anybody they can find. We are seeing the most lowly of cuckservative media personalities – Will Nardi, discredited homosexual plagiarist Benny Johnson and porn star Mindy Robinson – attacking him and the groyper army on social media. There is nothing coincidental about any of this.

When you read what these people are posting, it becomes obvious that they are using the same tactics that anti-fascists and leftist groups regularly use against their political opponents. They are using smears and lies in an attempt to gaslight people into thinking that Fuentes is the most evil person to ever live.

Feeling blue-pilled? Have another cookie, friend.

Another popular tactic of leftists is to get people fired from their jobs for having politically incorrect views.

Matt Purple: Beard, Problem Glasses, Serious Concern.

That’s why it is interesting to see how the fake conservative Matt Purple, who has written for the National Review and other cuckservative publications, gloated about how Fuentes won’t be able to find a job for exercising free speech.

The American Conservative:

And while I’m sure he’s enjoyed spilling his Spaghetti-Os in front of an online audience, I wonder whether Fuentes has ever really considered the consequences of his actions. Because in railing against the mixing of the races, you doom yourself to a fixed path. Even if you eventually grow up and repudiate your views, YouTube is forever. And no real estate firm or graphic design company is going to hire someone who cut his teeth screaming about how his babysitter is under the influence of Jewish power. So while the right-wing outrage market might tempt with the promise of fame, its incentives are at odds with those of the greater economy: you can accrue Twitter followers by dabbling in racism, but ultimately you’ll ruin yourself.

Just what the hell is conservative about this statement? Aren’t conservatives supposed to be for free speech and a free exchange of ideas? This statement from Purple directly contradicts this.

How did we get here? I’m not sure, Mr. Purple, but I’d suspect it has something to do with all that horrible, evil shit the Jews did. 

He is trying to make an example out of Fuentes by telling people that if you dare articulate views and opinions outside the scope of 2019 polite society, you will be blacklisted and unable to find employment.

The American Conservative’s big own of Fuentes: he’s gonna have trouble finding a job.

That’s expected when you speak truth to power. Not everybody dreams of growing fat while their country dies https://t.co/WrdkkUVwUB pic.twitter.com/Lo4GPR9SUV

— Scott Greer (@ScottMGreer) November 20, 2019

People like Purple and these other fake conservative figures are nothing but traitors and cowards. They’d rather collect paychecks from fake conservative incorporated than stand up and speak the truth. They are many more times worse than the leftists they claim to oppose. At least the leftists will say it straight.

These shills all need to be discredited and purged from any and all positions of influence. They are roadblocks standing in the way of a true America First political agenda from being implemented.

Goodbye https://t.co/PbhJaeUx6D

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) November 21, 2019

You know what the main difference is between the “right-wing” and the “left-wing” parties in Europe?

The difference is that the “left-wing” parties want to destroy us on behalf of the Jews by any means necessary, and the “right-wing” ones want to destroy us on behalf of the Jews in a legal, orderly manner.

The Local:

Austria’s centre-right party has said it will insist on banning the far-right Identitarian Movement (IBÖ) as a condition of any coalition after next month’s elections.

Such a ban “must be in the next coalition agreement”, ÖVP parliamentary group leader August Wöginger said in a statement released to Austrian media.

The IBÖ, previously best known for its anti-immigration stunts, sparked controversy in Austria earlier this year after it was revealed that its leader Martin Sellner received money and exchanged emails with the suspected perpetrator of gun attacks on mosques in New Zealand in March which left 51 people dead.

I wasn’t aware you can ban an entire political organization because some guy there talked to someone who supposedly committed a crime on the other side of the planet.

And besides – Brenton did nothing wrong.

I don’t even understand why he’s under arrest.

The ÖVP’s call for the movement to be banned comes as it tries to maintain its commanding poll lead ahead of parliamentary elections on September 29th while at the same time distancing itself from its former coalition partner, the far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ).

Austrian media reports have documented numerous links between Identitarian activists and FPÖ party members.

After the ÖVP first floated possible moves against the Identitarians earlier this week, the FPÖ’s former Interior Minister Herbert Kickl rejected the possibility of banning the IBÖ, saying such a move would be “a deep attack on the rule of law”.

Heck your rule of law bud.

These are feels we’re talking about here.

The coalition between the ÖVP and the FPÖ was sworn in in late 2017 but was dogged by frequent scandals over extremist statements by FPÖ party members.

The government collapsed in May after a video emerged of the then leader of the FPÖ, Heinz-Christian Strache, appearing to offer public contracts to a fake Russian donor in return for campaign help for the FPÖ.

The scandal prompted Strache to resign as vice-chancellor and led then Chancellor Sebastian Kurz to call fresh elections.

If you’ll recall, that was a set-up made by a kike in collaboration with the media.

Earlier this week Strache’s house was raided as apart of another investigation into possible corruption offences surrounding the appointment of an FPÖ official to a high-ranking position at a gambling corporation.

Despite the scandals, and the recriminations that have flown between the ÖVP and the FPÖ since their coalition collapsed, a fresh government composed of the two parties is seen as one of the most likely outcomes of September’s poll.

Wait… So it’s gonna be the exact same situation after the election?

Why did you even have it in the first place?

For that matter – what would even be the difference if someone else won?

Is there any party in Austria that actually wants to stop the mud flood?

No?

Thought so…

Every politician that isn’t an explicit blood-and-soil nationalist is the enemy.

No exceptions.

Jew-run Breitbart, like other “conservative” media operations, is feeding bullshit to their readers about how we can’t regulate Big Tech while selling them on impractical solutions.

Right now there’s a push from all sides of the political spectrum to sell people on hoax solutions to the problem of social media censorship. What’s disturbing is how so much of it is coming from alleged “conservatives.”

Let’s review some of the bullshit these “conservatives” are selling people.

Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, said that sites like Facebook and Twitter should be banned from being able to receive contracts from the federal government.

RT if you believe it is time for @realDonaldTrump to sign an executive order banning tech companies from getting federal contracts due to viewpoint discrimination

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) May 5, 2019

Tiana Lowe, a 20-something e-thot from the Washington Examiner (trained by National Review), was rambling on Twitter about how the government shouldn’t regulate these companies. She says we can’t do this because they are private entities and that regulating them would violate free market principles.

Two things can be true at once:
1. It’s immoral for social media platforms to call themselves objective platforms and then inconsistently regulate speech.
2. The government has neither the right nor the competency to regulate this problem out of existence.

— Tiana Lowe (@TianaTheFirst) May 2, 2019

David French, a National Review writer, claimed that social media censorship would eventually be corrected by the free market.

Here’s a quote:

As a matter of principle (private companies enjoy the blessings of liberty) and pragmatism (social media is unlikely to improve under the watchful eye of, say, President Kamala Harris), I oppose government efforts to regulate social-media speech policies. But publicly exposing inconsistency and hypocrisy lays the groundwork for a market correction. The most powerful check on social media remains the user base; the companies’ economic models depend not just on user loyalty but also user growth.

These are all ridiculous arguments.

Kirk’s argument makes no sense, as sites like Facebook and Twitter derive little if any revenue from federal government contracts. So banning them from getting such a contract would not motivate them to change their policies.

And this gibberish about not regulating these companies because of free market principles is insane. We don’t have a free market and this makes all of these free market-related arguments null and void. What we have is a cartel of tech companies that conspire together to crush competition through tortious interference. All you have to do is look at some of the things that’s happened to Gab and the many failed attempts to build alternative payment processors.

Now we have the Jew-run website Breitbart publishing an article by John Nolte saying that we should stop whining about the existing situation and just build our own Facebook, Twitter and PayPal. And do you know why we can do it? Because the Jews found a way to create Israel even though six million of them were allegedly gassed in fake shower rooms during World War II.

Breitbart:

Yes, conservatives can beat the prejudice and blacklists and build our own Facebook and Twitter and Apple and PayPal; of course, we can. The first step, though, is to stop playing the victim and admit that we can.

You want to know what the country of Israel is? The greatest workaround in the history of mankind.

After World War II, and for reasons no one need explain, the Jewish people believed they had no place in a world that rejected and discriminated against them. So what did they do? They created a workaround — the great State of Israel. Their own country.

The Jews were only able to create Israel because they had already gained enormous power through their control of the West’s financial, media and political systems. We do not have this type of power, so such a comparison is invalid.

But it isn’t surprising to see Nolte make this bizarre argument. After all, Breitbart per their own admission was born in the United States but conceived in Israel. It is unquestionably a Jewish operation.

Nolte makes other weird comparisons to the Mormons and NASA before calling us quitters and crybabies. He even says that he’d trade ten of us quitters for an illegal alien with a dream and work ethic.

But you’re still going to sit there and crybaby and tell me we cannot come up with our own Facebook, YouTube, Apple, Instagram, Twitter, Paypal, or whatever-the-hell other platforms these Silicon Valley fascists are using to silence us, persecute us, and discriminate against us.

That’s it? We’re just going to sit here and play the victim because it’s too hard?

Yes, I’ve heard all the excuses coming from the professional quitters and crybabies… Facebook is too powerful, too big, too dug in; we’ll never draw enough people away from it. Same with Twitter, YouTube, Instagram… If we build our own Twitter, they’ll blacklist us on PayPal; if we build our own PayPal, they’ll blacklist our credit cards; if we build our own credit cards, they’ll blacklist our bank… They’ll blacklist our URLs, they’ll remove us from their servers. It can’t be done!!! Now watch me run around in a helpless puppy dog circle to prove it!!!

You’re telling me that the same species that built its own freakin’ country cannot come up with a workaround around Mark Zuckerberg?

Please.

You’re not an American, you’re an American’t — and I’ll trade ten of you for one illegal alien with a dream and work ethic.

Needless to say, this is a totally ridiculous argument. A real American is somebody who seeks practical solutions. What Nolte is proposing is not the least bit practical.

Even if we had all the resources in the world, you can’t just build an alternative digital public square. That’s because there can only be one digital public square at any given time. Just look at how Gab is perceived compared to Twitter. Gab is looked at as a digital ghetto for people who have been banned from participating in mainstream political discourse. There are very few if any important political figures posting on both Twitter and Gab.

Gab doesn’t somehow make Twitter “not a monopoly” because it is “alternative social media.”

It also took over a decade to build Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to the point where these sites were able to comprise parts of the overall digital public square. Plus, it would take many years to build new infrastructure and attract the same amount of users that are actively using these sites. And all of this would come with zero guarantees that people would actually move over to use this new infrastructure.

The practical solution is to regulate the existing infrastructure that has already been built so that it serves the public interest. This means that sites like Facebook and Twitter would be classified as public utilities with the government guaranteeing universal access and quality of service. So political censorship, manipulated algorithms and other dirty tricks to suppress content would be strictly forbidden. The government would mandate a level playing field for all people on these platforms.

It is not practical to build completely new infrastructure to try and compete with a cartel of tech companies that already use their vast resources to sabotage competition.

Hilariously, Nolte admits that he has no idea how we would go about building any of this new infrastructure. But he wants to criticize us as whiners for simply identifying the logistical challenges of the impractical nonsense he is proposing.

Hey, I’ll admit I have no idea how to do it, and other than opening people’s eyes to the possibility, I’ll probably have no role in doing it.

But my God, can we please stop mewling about how impossible and difficult it will be?

And no, I am not arguing we stop fighting these un-American Silicon Valley fascists. My proposition is not an either/or. We need to continue to fight for our free speech rights, our fight against their blacklists and discrimination. In fact, that fight must intensify. We cannot allow these con artists, these monstrous swindlers, to capture the public square promising free speech only to pull the rug out from underneath us after that capture is complete.

But at the same time, let’s build our own workarounds, our own Facebook, our own YouTube, our own Apple, and if we must, our own banks, credit cards, and domain registrars.

He literally wants us to sit idly by while a cartel of tech companies stifle free political speech on the Internet. All while we wait for someone to build brand new social media infrastructure on par with the existing digital public square. And he wants us to do this in an environment that does not operate in a free market that is totally dominated by a Silicon Valley tech cartel no less.

This is entirely unacceptable. Our free speech rights are being violated by a private consortium of tech companies who have complete administrative control over the digital public square – largely due to the support these companies have gotten from the government directly, along with their use of taxpayer-funded infrastructure. The American people are literally paying to be banned from Twitter and Facebook, and these sonsovbitches want to tell you that’s “the free market.”

We should not have to wait years for a solution when the government can provide an immediate fix. These “conservatives” are giving Donald Trump a pass for his total lack of action on what is arguably the single most critical issue of our generation.

They can go ahead and try to claim they don’t have an agenda. But the whole thing is transparent. Breitbart is a part of the new Jewish-approved controlled-opposition right-wing, which is being led by Ben Shapiro. That is why they are coming out in defense of blacklisting unapproved publications like the Daily Stormer and Infowars – who just happen to be their direct competitors.

If “conservatives” like Nolte really believed in free political speech, they wouldn’t claim that a hoax-free market is more important than the First Amendment. It’s an insane argument that the founders of the country would have absolutely rejected if they were alive today. Because hell, if George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were alive today they would have already been banned from sites like Facebook and Twitter.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report. 

Which is worse – the party that openly advocates for Brown Communism, or the party that sides with corporations importing scab labor?

It’s an academic question at this point.

Breitbart:

Republican leaders are expected to drop a political stinker on President Donald Trump by mid-December: a donor-backed amendment that would allow investors to import more college-graduates from India to take jobs now held by American college graduates.

Little will they know that the minute they get to the US and apply for a job, they’ll learn that it has been outsourced to India. Check and mate, Deep State.

The GOP-run amendment puts 300,000 imported Indian temporary workers and 300,000 of their family members on a fast-track to green-cards, Americans’ jobs, citizenship, and the ballot box — but it provides no benefits to middle-class Americans.

Whattaya gonna do, sucka? Vote Democrat?

You’re stuck with us, see?

The GOP amendment would provide Democratic-leaning donors with more imported white-collar workers, more temporary workers, more profits, and higher stock values — but it provides nothing to help the GOP win the 2020 election.

Yeah, but it helps big businesses with big pockets who want to import IT labor, and who pay big bribe – er, sorry I mean they lobby the GOP to help get it done.

“It’ll grow the economy!” – they promise.

Yet the little-known amendment “is very much alive,” a source told Breitbart News.

The amendment is hidden in House’s 2019 draft budget plan for the Department of Homeland Security. Reporters have almost entirely ignored the amendment while they focus on the debate over border-wall funding. In turn, business-friendly GOP staffers and legislators do not see the amendment’s political danger or the public opposition, the source said.

Does this surprise anyone? Take one look at the nerds and monsters that inhabit the GOP.

Exhibit A: David French

Exhibit B: David French and his nigger babe.

Normal, healthy, all-American members of the GOP!

But the Department of Homeland Security has ended its silence on the plan by telling Breitbart News that it opposes the amendment. “It is important that Congress does due diligence on any proposed sweeping change to our immigration system,” a DHS official told Breitbart News. “The bottom line is Congress needs to ensure what they are passing is in the best interests of the American people.”

Well, it seems that the DHS is the only loyal institution left in America. Which would explain why the Left is attacking it so much and demanding that it be abolished.

I wouldn’t be surprised to hear the Republicans join the chorus soon and start demanding the same thing as the Left.

What they’re doing now is saying, “hey, we want the same thing as the Left, but we want it done legally.” 

I used to think this was a dog-whistle tactic to deflect accusations of racism – but now I’m not so sure. On like a meta level, I think that we need to start rejecting complicated answers to simple scenarios. The GOP is lobbying for mass migration because that’s what their donors want them to do. This will ensure that Republicans no longer get elected in the future, but then, most of these politicians are in it for themselves – they want to get enough money to get into that gated community and lift the drawbridge behind them, that’s about it. 

If it means selling the country for silver, they’re down for that, and they’ve even got an entire cuck ideology to cloak their self-serving avarice in, lest they lay awake at night, tossing and turning thinking about what they’ve done.

Agreeing with the liberals for all the wrong reasons.

Ever since all the attention that was put on the NFL protests, an opportunity has presented itself to us. The Jews seem to have completely abandoned American patriotism as a tool to control and influence the goyim, instead doing everything in their power to attack America and its history.

That means the field is wide open for us to take up the flag as a symbol of White nationalism.

You’d think that after this pivot, Jews would realize their mistake and try to walk back their terrible strategic mistake. But it appears they’re either unwilling or incapable of doing so.

Instead, they’re doubling down – hard.

CBS News:

The California chapter of the NAACP is pushing to get rid of the national anthem, calling the song racist and anti-black, CBS station KOVR-TV reports.

“This song is wrong,” chapter president Alice Huffman told the station. “It should never have been there, and just like we didn’t have it until 1931, it won’t kill us if it goes away.”

Huffman? Are we dealing with one of these mythical “nig-kikes?”

As quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers, Colin Kaepernick started the NFL protests during the anthem that quickly spread to bring attention to racial injustice in the country. But Huffman said Kaepernick’s message was lost when it turned into a debate about the flag.

“The real intentions got overlooked, and it’s become something that’s dividing us, and I’m looking for a way to bring us back together,” she said.

Huffman said that the protests led her to look at the lyrics of “The Star-Spangled Banner,” especially the parts of the anthem Americans don’t typically sing.

“It’s racist,” she said. “It doesn’t represent our community. It’s anti-black people.“

Huffman is referring to the third stanza, which includes the lyric “no refuge could save the hireling and slave from the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave.”

She said some interpretations conclude that the lyrics celebrate the deaths of black American slaves fighting for freedom and the song should be replaced with something that supports all our values.

That’s actually completely true and accurate. The American national anthem celebrates the death of nigger slaves.

This is known.

I agree completely that the national anthem honors White Americans and spites uppity Blacks, and that they have no business identifying as “Americans.” It doesn’t shock me at all that Jews and Blacks would recoil at Americanism and proclaim themselves as enemies of our nation.

What does shock me, however, is that cuckservatives would have the nerve to claim that American values are all about diversity, inclusion and men buggering each other.

Or about letting in the whole population of Mexico.

The cards are all on the table now.

White people have a clear choice: side with America and their race, or against America and the foreign hordes. There is no middle ground anymore.

Is the age of boomer cuck conservatism finally coming to an end? It certainly looks that way. Another boomer cuck in the Senate has decided to quit.

CBS News:

Sen. Jeff Flake abruptly announced Tuesday he won’t run for re-election after all in the 2018 midterm elections and will leave the Senate when his term ends in January 2019. He also delivered a blistering rebuke of President Trump’s behavior.

The Arizona Republican announced on the Senate floor that he could “better serve my country and conscience” by dropping his re-election bid, “freeing myself of the political consideration that consumed far too much bandwidth,” he said.

Flake issued a thinly-veiled take-down of President Trump, criticizing the “personal attacks,” the “threats against principles, freedom and institutions” and “flagrant disregard for truth and decency.” He argued that recklessness, outrageous and unhinged behavior have been excused as “telling it like it is, but he warned that when such behavior “emanates from the top of government,” he said it’s something else.

“It is dangerous to our democracy,” Flake said. “Why didn’t you speak up? What are we going to say?” he asked rhetorically. “Mr. President, I rise today to say, enough.”

What a loser this Flake clown is. He claims that he’s not seeking re-election because of “principles” and “values” which is a lie. He’s not seeking re-election because he knows he can’t win. A poll conducted a few months ago showed Flake with an approval rating of 18 percent! Keli Ward, his primary opponent supported by Steve Bannon, has also been leading him by a large margin in polls.

The most pathetic part about this is how Flake used his speech to attack the President, claiming that he threatens “principles” or something. What the hell does that even mean? What “principles” is he talking about?

All we’ve heard from boomer cuck conservative types is talk about “principles” and “values,” yet they’ve managed to conserve nothing. They’ve pushed endless wars for Jews, allowed unlimited third world immigration and managed to fold on every cultural issue of significance. This is their legacy. If these are what he calls “principles” and “values,” then it is a good thing that he views the President poorly. Trump should view this as a badge of honor.

And he’s probably butt hurt because Trump called him out as an unprincipled faggot.

Great to see that Dr. Kelli Ward is running against Flake Jeff Flake, who is WEAK on borders, crime and a non-factor in Senate. He's toxic!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 17, 2017

Flake is a traitor just like his fellow boomer cuck Bob Corker who has been all over the Jew run national media whining about Trump. Corker quit under similar circumstances. He knew that he couldn’t win because White Americans want their country back and are no longer going to put up with fools like hims.

Let’s hope we see more of these Republican cucks quit. They all need to be purged from the ranks of political power. The sooner this happens the better!

(((Jason Willick)))

In a classic display of projection, kike “journalist” (((Jason Willick))) (@jawillick) asserts that the Alt-Right is an enemy of the West.

Willick is a staff writer for The American Interest, a neoconservative rag one could describe as a spin-off of the National Review.

The comments came after a series of articles by fellow tribe members which claimed that Trump’s Poland speech was a thinly veiled white nationalist speech, presumably because they were still butthurt over him choosing to forego a visit to the Polish Holocaust memorial to venerate the six million.

Why can’t you just venerate them goy?

Normally, articles like these aren’t even worth paying attention to, as hollow warnings about white supremacy are a dime a dozen. What makes this article stand out from the kvetching crowd however, is the way it shows a National Review type’s dawning understanding of the storm that is brewing on the horizon.

(((Willick))) writes for the Washington Post:

The speech — a call to arms for a Western civilization ostensibly menaced by decadence and bloat from within and hostile powers from without — was received across the center-left as a thinly veiled apologia for white nationalism. “Trump did everything but cite Pepe the Frog,” tweeted the Atlantic’s Peter Beinart. “Trump’s speech in Poland sounded like an alt-right manifesto,” read a Vox headline. According the New Republic’s Jeet Heer, Trump’s “alt-right speech” “redefined the West in nativist terms.”

Thus, the intelligentsia is now flirting with an intellectually indefensible linguistic coup: Characterizing any appeal to the coherence or distinctiveness of Western civilization as evidence of white nationalist sympathies. Such a shift, if accepted, would so expand the scope of the term “alt-right” that it would lose its meaning. Its genuinely ugly ideas would continue to fester, but we would lose the rhetorical tools to identify and repudiate them as distinct from legitimate admiration for the Western tradition. To use a favorite term of the resistance, the alt-right would become normalized.

All rhetoric aside, Shlomo is absolutely right here. By correctly pointing out that Western values are white values and subsequently declaring war on them, liberals are effectively obliterating the civic nationalist position. This in turn leads to a polarization of the Whites who are increasingly forced to pick a side: Anti-White or Pro-White. The net effect of this is the destruction of the left’s most useful tool for keeping Whites idle – Cuckservativism.

Whether or not it’s intentional is highly debatable, but my belief is that the (((people at the top))) are doing this because they are so close to complete control over the country’s political system that all they need is a tiny percent of cucks to swing their way, and they are willing to risk creating a million new white nationalists to achieve this.

Of course, they seem to have forgotten what a large group of awakened Whites are capable of.

So let’s remind them.

For eons, kike journalists, kike sociology professors, kike politicians and other luminaries of progress and civilization have assured us stupid goyim that the “slippery slope” is just a fallacy that we’re using because we have no better arguments.

It turns out, once again, that not only is the slippery slope real, but it’s more slipperier than anyone could’ve predicted.

Daily Caller:

The Oregon legislature passed two bills Thursday decriminalizing small amounts of six hard drugs, including cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine and ecstasy.

The first of the two bills now headed to the governor’s desk, HB 2355, decriminalizes possession of the drugs so long as the offender has neither a felony nor more than two prior drug convictions on record, according to the Lund Report. The second, HB 3078, reduces drug-related property crimes from felonies to misdemeanors.

Notice that they’re still not fully decriminalized, but that’ll come as soon as they figure out the current law is racist, because you know all seven and a half niggers in Oregon all use drugs and all have multiple convictions.

Republican State Sen. Jackie Winters claimed the war on drugs as it currently exists amounts to “institutional racism” due to how more frequently minorities are charged with drug crimes than whites.

What did I just say?

“There is empirical evidence that there are certain things that follow race. We don’t like to look at the disparity in our prison system,” Winters said during a hearing. “It is institutional racism. We can pretend it doesn’t exist, but it does.”

You can pretend most niggers aren’t clinically retarded and prone to criminality of every kind, but they are. And you can’t change biology, no matter how much you try.

This was caused by poverty. We all know the saying “I’m so hungry I could rape a horse,” right?

The second bill reduces mandatory minimum sentences for many property crimes and also increases the number of previous convictions necessary for a felony charge. It provides $7 million in funding for diversion programs to help lower Oregon’s prison population.

Sterilization would be much cheaper, and would actually work.

Winters and other supporters of the bills argue the answer to America’s drug crisis is treatment, not prison time.

“It would be like putting them in the state penitentiary for having diabetes,” Democratic Rep. Mitch Greenlick told the Lund Report. “This is a chronic brain disorder and it needs to be treated this way.”

People with diabetes don’t whack people in the head for money when they need a fix. Somebody who’s on heroin is not even a minimally functional human being, and your stupid little programs won’t help 99% of them. The only solution to the drug problem is a healthy all-White society, everything else is just a waste of money.

For any of you reading this that are on drugs – quit. Right now. If you really can’t manage your day-to-day life without some mind altering substance, at least make sure it’s alcohol and not this crap. A man can still function by drinking a couple of bottles of wine a day, unlike heroine or cocaine, which are essentially an even dumber form of suicide. I drank an entire bottle of red wine in the last hour, and I can still do anything I could when I’m sober, including watch anime, write this article, then watch more anime.

You too can live the dream, but only if you don’t take drugs. So, like, don’t take drugs, okay?

Just say no