And just like that, The Age of Men is over.

The Age of Top Cunt and Her Apes has dawned.

Reuters:

The new British Prime Minister Liz Truss has selected a cabinet where for the first time a white man will not hold one of the country’s four most important ministerial positions.

Truss appointed Kwasi Kwarteng – whose parents came from Ghana in the 1960s – as Britain’s first Black finance minister while James Cleverly is the first Black foreign minister.

Kwasi Karteng

James Cleverly

Cleverly, whose mother hails from Sierra Leone and whose father is white, has in the past spoken about being bullied as a mixed-race child and has said the party needs to do more to attract Black voters.

Suella Braverman, whose parents came to Britain from Kenya and Mauritius six decades ago, succeeds Priti Patel as the second ethnic minority home secretary, or interior minister, where she will be responsible for police and immigration.

Suella Braverman

The growing diversity is in part thanks to a push by the Conservative Party in recent years to put forward a more varied set of candidates for parliament.

British governments have until a few decades ago been made up of mostly white men. It took until 2002 for Britain to appoint its first ethnic minority cabinet minister when Paul Boateng was appointed chief secretary to the Treasury.

Rishi Sunak, whose parents came from India, was Kwarteng’s predecessor in the finance job and the runner-up to Truss in the leadership context.

“Politics has set the pace. We now treat it as normal, this diversity,” said Sunder Katwala, director of non-partisan think-tank British Future, which focuses on migration and identity. “The pace of change is extraordinary.”

However, the upper ranks of business, the judiciary, the civil service and army are all still predominately white.

And despite the party’s diversity campaign, only a quarter of Conservative members of parliament are women and 6% from minority backgrounds.

Nevertheless, the Conservatives have the best track record of political firsts among the main political parties, including appointing the first Jewish prime minister in Benjamin Disraeli in 1868.

This is despite the fact ethnic minority voters are much more likely to back the opposition Labour party and the ruling party has faced accusations of racism, misogyny and Islamophobia.

Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson apologised in 2019 for describing Muslim women wearing burqas as looking like letter boxes.

The Conservatives have elected all three of Britain’s female prime ministers, Margaret Thatcher, Theresa May and now Truss. The first lawmaker of Asian descent, Mancherjee Bhownaggree in 1895, also came from the Conservatives.

Johnson assembled the youngest and most ethnically diverse Cabinet in history when he elected prime minister in 2019. His three finance ministers included two men of South Asian origin and one of Kurdish background.

I can see how someone could go along with “okay well, we can allow nonwhites in our country and give them opportunities.”

But saying “actually, we’re replacing white men on purpose – we’re forcing them out and then we’re bragging about it” – that seems like a bridge too far, no?

We’ve been saying for years that the Alt-Lite (InfoWars, Breitbart, MILO, etc) is nothing more than a long con to drag increasingly radical young white men back to the (((conservative plantation))).

But mounting evidence shows that we are the ones dragging the revolution forward. The alt-lite is nothing more than a set of reactionary fingernail scratches on the wall.

In light of the purging of Paul Nehlen, Baked Alaska has come forward to reveal that Breitbart tried to pressure him into lying about Jews. BA could’ve gotten far in the conservative movement if he simply played ball, but he chose to follow his conscience. Whatever people have to say about him otherwise, he deserves respect for his integrity.

At this point, it seems that the Alt-Lite is starting to give up in competing for our demographic and reverting back to the cuckservative mean. Being Alt-Lite puts you in a weird spot where Jews refuse to throw money behind you, but you’re also constantly hemorrhaging supporters and fans to the Alt-Right.

In the case of Breitbart, whenever they start veering too far off-course, Jews fire warning shots at their ad-revenue and sponsors. If Breitbart were to draw the full ire of the ruling class and government (deplatforming, political persecution, censorship) like us real nationalists, it would be the end of their business.

What comes next in 2018 is anybody’s guess. The only thing we know for sure is that the momentum is with the radicals.

As for the tired reactionaries, they will either go back to business as usual or drop out completely.

The main issues in American politics are mass immigration, demographic change, and the new Culture War against implicit symbols of white identity. A celebrity businessman is now the leading GOP candidate for president only because of his banal truism that illegals from Mexico commit crimes. The overwhelmingly white base of the Republican Party is coping with the brutal reality that European-Americans will be a minority in the country they created. Even the Left is gripped in internecine warfare as an older generation of white progressives grapple with a multicultural monster of its own creation, as minority activists would rather agitate about “white privilege” than suffer through boring speeches about jobs or infrastructure.

The racial question is at the center of American politics and culture. Every new controversy or scandal simply reveals a new facet of the issue racially conscious whites have been debating for decades.

At a time when the Republican Party ostensibly controls Congress, President Obama is unilaterally enacting racially charged policies on immigration, housing, and law enforcement that will have incalculable consequences for ordinary Americans–and there has been no real resistance from the majority party. The only notable thing the Republican-controlled legislature has done is pass a secret trade agreement that has the effect of enabling more immigration–“the worst bill Congress has ever passed,” in the words of Phyllis Schlafly. On top of all this, Justice John Roberts–appointed by the elder Bush–has cemented the legitimacy of Obamacare and “gay marriage.”

Conservatives should be steamrolling a lame-duck president. Instead, the GOP might as well not exist. Grassroots Republicans who thought they had retaken the government are confused, angry, and powerless. They worked for Republicans in good faith, but get only scorn and contempt. They’ve been deceived, cheated, antd exploited.

In short, they’ve been “cucked,” or cuckolded.

The Dissident Right received one of its periodic media boosts yesterday when Conservatism Inc. functionaries Matt Lewis of the Daily Caller and Erick Erickson of Red State discovered and denounced the insult “cuckservative,” which is being used against the Beltway Right.

These spasms of attention from “conservatives” don’t usually last, but this one is different.

The perfect storm of anti-white aggression by minorities and the media, the abject Republican surrender on virtually every issue, the insurgent candidacy of Donald Trump, and the sheer vacuity of what passes for intellectual debate in the Beltway Right has finally led many Republicans to understand Conservatism Inc. has failed. More than that, Conservatism Inc. has always failed. If every political life ends in failure, to quote Enoch Powell, the American conservative movement is unique in that it began with failure.

As it stands today, after decades of electoral success, the conservative movement has not only done nothing to cut the size of government or preserve traditional values, it has managed to literally endanger the continued existence of the national community. The wholesale dispossession of the ethnic core of the country and the utter political and cultural transformation of American society can’t be defended by any definition of “conservatism,” no matter how expansive.

We can’t even call the Beltway Right self-interested. Even within the pages of its own publications, the conservative movement concedes that leaders such as Ronald Reagan could no leader be elected because of the massive demographic change it has presided over.

Yet this isn’t why they are cuckolds. While the demographic transformation–what the French are now calling “the great replacement”–is important, the fact that “conservatives” dare not lift a finger against it is the least of their sins. They’re cucks because they take pride in degradation and defeat.

Cuckservatives glory in advocating positions that hurt their own supporters and humiliate themselves. They act thrilled and proud when they throw one of their own to the wolves. Like Rich Lowry, they might even thank the people who alert them to the dissidents in their midst. They make self-evidently foolish arguments that ideologically disarm their own constituents and reward their foes. They completely accept the moral standards of people who despise them.

“Immigration isn’t a winning issue, let’s talk about tax cuts for corporations with rainbow avatars instead.” –#cuckservative

— Nathanael Strickland (@faith_heritage) July 24, 2015

They are like a man who tries to appeal to a woman through acts of submission; they inspire not desire but disgust. Each new conservative surrender inspires only further contempt in the hearts of leftists, which of course encourages conservatives to capitulate even more eagerly the next time. And since the conservative base remains overwhelmingly white–this proves it is “racist”–there will always be a next time. There’s also the variety of cuckold who gets a thrill from watching another man mount his wife. Such a creature possesses the illusion of control. He can tell himself that he is directing this obscenity and thus remains, in some way, the dominant figure. American conservatism is perhaps best summarized as maintaining a posture of command even as the reality of control is lost. Thus conservatives cheering on the demographic transformation of the country tell themselves they remain leaders in the new America. The cuck in the corner begging to be degraded is still technically the “man of the house,” for all the good it does him. We see the premises of cuckservatism at work in the posts by Mr. Lewis and Mr. Erickson. Mr. Erickson says “cuckservative” is “a slur against Christian voters coined by white-supremacists.” Yet one of the charges against cuckservatives is they have utterly failed to maintain Christian morality in public life. What Pat Buchanan used to call “God’s Country” is a nation where the greatest hero in public life is a 65-year-old man in drag.

So the mainstream is taking notice of the term #cuckservative. And their best defense? “That’s racist!” — Ian (@Ian2813) July 23, 2015

However, the key to understanding this position can be found in an earlier controversy, when both Mr. Lewis and Mr. Erickson disagreed with Ann Coulter for suggesting American Christians could most effectively serve their fellow citizens instead of morally preening by trying to save Africans. Mr. Lewis suggested Miss Coulter’s position was akin to an immigration restrictionist position, which constitutes a “cry of victimhood” andsleads to a politics for the “angry and dispossessed.” An “aspirational” country like ours is one that welcomes more immigration (regardless of the source), sends charity outward, and has a dogmatic belief that the future can get only better.

#cuckservative: A person who wishes for America’s return to 1950s values/strength, without admitting the nation was 90% white then…

— Paul Kersey (@sbpdl) July 23, 2015

Superiority is thus shown by not working in your own interest. As Mr. Lewis replied to Mr. Erickson’s initial tweet about cuckservatism, “They want you to be tribal–to only advocate policies that help your tribe. Otherwise you’re a cuckold.” This is an implicit admission that cuckservatives are consciously not helping their tribe. They seem to think it would be immoral and would lower them somehow. Meanwhile, every other tribe on earth aggressively advances its own interests. The original definition of cuckold–a man who raises the offspring of another–comes to mind when we think of conservatives’ apparent glee at the replacement of Americans with ethnocentric Third Worlders. But the moral calculus of men like Mr. Lewis and Mr. Erickson reflects a deeper perversion. Like the man who begs to watch as he is cuckolded, they reframe the reality of inferiority as a kind of weird proof of superiority. Their own degradation is proof of their imagined virtue and make-believe power. The same mental gymnastics take place when it comes to ideology. One of Mr. Lewis’s objections to “racial tribalism” is that it betrays “Dr. King’s vision.” To make such a claim in 2015 reveals either astonishing ignorance or willful deceit. King explicitly supported racial preferences for blacks and pushed policies more extreme than what Mr. Lewis describes as the “left” racial tribalism of “Netroots nation.” Since Matt Lewis grounds his surrender to leftism in his ostensible Christian belief, he might be also be interested to know that “Rev.” King didn’t just regularly commit adultery but denied the divinity of Christ.

Mr. Lewis’s stance is not uncommon. The fanatical insistence by conservatives that “Dr.” King was really a pro-American supporter of “colorblindness”–in defiance of all evidence–shows the coating of protective stupidity necessary for survival within the Beltway Right. More importantly, it shows how conservatives give progressives moral power over them, granting “the sanction of the victim.” Anyone who knows anything about King’s life knows he would think today’s conservatives were racist, just as he despised the conservatives of his own time. Yet by denying this and pretending otherwise, conservatives prove their imagined superiority. Like the cuckold farming out his wife, they create the illusion of control even as they concede all power and dignity.

The #cuckservative buys into all of the Left’s key premises & worships the Left’s heroes, then is genuinely surprised when his side loses. — Trainspotter (@Trainspotter001) July 23, 2015

The real story is how a resistance to all of this has arisen. While the Beltway Right obsesses about non-issues like the Export-Import Bank, the Dissident Right is creating a vocabulary to fight “conservatives” who are more eager than their supposed leftist enemies to destroy racially conscious whites. While cuckservatives claim to adhere to abstract principles, wiser men and women understand that ideology is often the echo of racial, cultural, and ethnic interests. And since cuckservatives no longer bother concealing they care nothing for their own white supporters, frustrated whites are looking for alternatives.

The 21st century will be the Century of Identity, as ethnopolitics in the multicultural West replaces the phony Left/Right divisions of the past. While American conservatism knowingly and consciously subordinates the interests of its supporters to a suicidal “moral” vision, the successful political movements of the future will confidently assert the legitimate interests of its members.

As grassroots conservatives are gradually awakening to the reality that Conservatism Inc. is a scam, Beltway operatives will need to make a choice: They can reclaim their dignity and confront like men the forces they are destroying them, or they can sit in the corner and keep telling themselves they’re in control. They can prepare the new age–or they can continue as cucked bootlickers of men who despise them.