Unfortunately for the French, due to the strength of our democracy, they have no ability to influence government policy.

They just have to sit there and take it, and if they complain, they go to jail.

If these people want to live in a country with no immigrants, they can go live in a fascist state like China.

In White countries, our values are replacing ourselves with brown people, because that’s who we are: we are a dying race hellbent on oblivion.

Remix:

An overwhelming majority of French citizens do not think their government should welcome any more migrants to France and two-thirds of the country backs a referendum on immigration, recent polling has shown.

According to the survey conducted by the CSA Institute for CNEWS published on Tuesday, 80 percent of people in France want a ban on immigration, compared with just 19 percent in favor of further new arrivals.

Opposition to more mass immigration is the majority view among all age groups. The most welcoming demographic is younger people; however, 68 percent remain against more immigration compared to 31 percent in favor.

The age bracket most opposed to open borders is 50-64, where 88 percent are against, five percentage points more than those aged 65+.

While opposition to mass immigration is almost unanimous among right-leaning voters — 100 percent of Éric Zemmour’s Reconquête and 98 percent of National Rally voters are against it — an increasing number of left-wing sympathizers are also questioning the number of new arrivals into France.

It’s obviously totally out of control all across Europe.

The UK is trying to bring people from Rwanda. Rwanda!

A total of 56 percent of left-wing voters oppose more immigration, with the only slim majorities in favor found among supporters of the Radical Party of the Left (55 percent), LFI (55 percent), and the Greens (52 percent).

The survey was conducted on Dec. 11-12 as the French government’s immigration bill was being rejected by the French parliament. Left-wing parliamentary factions believed the bill infringed on human rights, while right-wing politicians including Marine Le Pen said the bill was “pro-immigration.”

The same poll revealed that two-thirds of French citizens also support a referendum on immigration, a move proposed for some time by right-wing parties, who believe an influx of new arrivals has threatened social cohesion in the country and led to an increase in crime.

An increase in crime due to immigration was evidenced last week by Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin who revealed that 60 percent of people arrested in France are foreign nationals.

And 38% are French-born foreigners.

I just made that number up, but it’s obvious on its face.

There are studies in America that show blacks are 85 times more likely than whites to commit violent crime. Not 85% more likely, but 85 times (8,500%).

This situation is ridiculous.

People apparently believe this is going to happen to someone else, and not them.

Or this is a totally fake poll.

Honestly, I don’t meet people who believe in child trannies, other than unhinged white women. But the global warming thing – they’ve actually convinced people that you are some stupid hillbilly if you don’t believe this bullshit.

No one wants to look like a stupid hillbilly. Everyone is very concerned about status.

There used to be the alternative of having status for being “rebellious” and “cool.” But that whole concept seems to have largely dissolved, because the price for being cool (i.e., right-wing in the current year) is so high, that even if it is sexy, people are not willing to pay the cost.

When I was a kid in the 1990s, listening to edgy “anarchist” music, supporting faggots, abortion and so on, was “cool.” (This was tied into opposition to George Bush and the evangelical movement.) But it was also, like, you could still be politically incorrect, say faggot, make rape jokes, etc.. I remember when I was about 19, in the mid-2000s, I started identifying as a Christian and saying abortion was just pandering to women. I was always on the edge of this “cool” stuff. I’m too old to be cool now, but I still feel some kind of obligation to oppose the mainstream consensus.

I’ve been meaning to write something about my own life and the evolution of rebelliousness. I don’t remember everything. But I do remember that by the time Al Gore came out with that global warming documentary that said New York would be under water by 2012, I was saying “yeah, that’s fake – Al Gore is a reptile creature from another dimension trying to suck the gas of life out of the atmosphere to make it habitable by demonic entities that are probably silicon-based lifeforms.”

Eventually, everyone figured out that the most rebellious thing you could do was deny the Holocaust. However, it now feels like the Jew issue is kind of opening up, and the real third rail is child marriage.

I’m here for it.

Look, we’re gonna try something new. Instead of posting a quote from a mainstream news article, I’m just going to summarize it with bullet points.

Here we go:

• A survey conducted by the Consumer Science and Analytics Institute in France reveals that 41% of respondents support a proposal by engineer Jean-Marc Jancovici to limit individuals to four flights in their lifetime.
• Among those under 35 years old, 48% back the idea, rising to 59% for 18 to 24-year-olds. Additionally, 64% of French people are in favor of reducing their air travel for the sake of the climate, with support increasing to 72% among those under 35.
• The French government, led by Emmanuel Macron, has actively worked to reduce air travel, implementing measures like banning domestic flights for journeys possible by train in under two-and-a-half hours.
• Recently, France urged EU nations to impose a minimum price on flights within Europe to cut down on emissions, although this proposal has faced opposition from airline associations citing violations of EU market laws.

I think these quotes from news sources might be too long and boring.

We want this website to be like, “pop-pop, muthafaka.”

Here’s the original on Breitbart. I would have had to quote 248 words. This takes it to 133, and contains the exact same amount of relevant information.

This may well be the future of the site. (It almost certainly will be.) I will continue to link the original article, for those interested in doing things the old-fashioned way, but I’ve always felt news articles were way too long, and the “…” system can only fix that so much, because much of the gluttony of news articles relates to the structure of the sentences themselves.

If more than a third of the population believes they should only have four flights in their lifetime… honestly, I don’t really even understand how to interpret that. Maybe it just means they don’t want to go to Asia or the Americas, because they believe there will be ultra-fast trains to everywhere in Europe.

I honestly just have a hard time believing that anyone believes in global warming at all. It’s so obviously fake for anyone looking at the evidence, and for a person too stupid to do that, it is so vague and far away. And surely, it should be obvious that warming is not a negative thing. Even stupid people have to be aware that people eat food that grows in fields only during the warm months.

And don’t we all learn in middle school that the earth is at the end of an ice age?