Rosie O’Donnel committed a felony offense by donating more than the maximum to a political campaign.

She should be convicted and registered as a felon.

That’s not going to happen though.

Nothing the American people want ever seems to happen.

Wow, you know – they’re right.

How can we call ourselves a democracy, even while we deny the right to vote to some of our most vulnerable citizens? We will not fulfill the essence of the constitution until toddlers and those in a vegetative coma are fully enfranchised.

That, of course, includes criminals.

What’s that? You’re worried that all of these people will vote for the Democrats as a block?

Tsk, tsk, tsk. That’s just a conspiracy theory.

Giving criminals the right to vote is a left wing conspiracy! Also, wear this tin foil suit to protect yourself against the mind-control rays.

Washington Post:

One month after the state Supreme Court threw out his blanket clemency order, Gov. Terry McAuliffe announced Monday that he has individually restored voting rights to 13,000 felons and is working on doing the same for a total of about 200,000.

McAuliffe (D) said he had found a way to comply with the court’s order while addressing “an issue of basic justice.”

So what if the governor who did this is a Democrat? It’s just a coincidence. Stop being so paranoid.

These people will surely make informed, responsible voters. Look! They’re already working on adopting a healthy lifestyle for themselves.

“I personally believe in the power of second chances and in the dignity and worth of every single human being,” he said beside a civil rights monument on Capitol Square. “These individuals are gainfully employed. They send their children and their grandchildren to our schools. They shop at our grocery stores and they pay taxes. And I am not content to condemn them for eternity as inferior, second-class citizens.”

Hmmm, I’m not sure about all that, buddy. I’m gonna have to look at your numbers first. My initial impression is that ex-felons don’t pay a lot of taxes. But then again, I’m a bigoted Nazi, so it could be the prejudice talking.

One way or another, though, what’s certain is that those 13,000 felons (and soon to be 200,000) will not be voting for Trump in the upcoming election. After all, the Glorious Leader has billed himself as the “law and order” candidate, which I doubt will appeal much even to the White ex-felons.

This is a transparent ploy by a Democrat operative to fraudulently undermine the Donald’s campaign.

These rat-like goblins are trying to sabotage our operation!

You know, my friends, it’s easy to feel down these days. The invasion of Europe by Moslem savages. Blacks burning our bitch down once every few months. Jews controlling everything. But once in a while, we get a piece of news so comforting and positive, it just makes those dark clouds vanish from your mind and you just feel lighter.

What’s Trending:

Recently, an algorithm has grown in popularity and is now used all over the country to help judges and parole boards access the likelihood of a person committing additional crimes in the future. It’s called Northpointe, and its results have affected prison sentences, parole chances, and bail amounts without substantial testing on whether or not it actually works long term.

Rather than leaving critical decisions to people who may be biased, the program aims to minimize human error as much as possible. However, the generalizations, oversights, and misgivings this algorithm is capable of seem to rival even the most incompetent judges and juries.

Science eliminated human error and prejudice from criminal sentencing. The result is pictured above.

Of course, the problem is that when a sensible man has to decide on sentencing these blacks, they only have one logical choice: lock up the monkey and throw away the key. And that sensible, common sense sort of decision is… how shall we say… racist. Therefore judges do the exact opposite to show how progressive they are.

But what if you could do the right thing, and not get called racist in the process? A crack team of science dudes developed the solution to this little problem.

There are many problems with using an algorithm to dictate sentences, but the one that sticks out is the undeniable bias it has towards minorities. A recent study by ProPublica proved the program to be an absolute failure in this regard. Only 20% of the 7000 criminals expected to commit a violent crime in the future had done so since their arrest.

It also takes specific variables and essential details out of the picture. Instead of evaluating each situation on a case by base basis, they analyze superfluous data from thousands of statistics that may not be at all related to the situation at hand.

When we stop looking at people and start looking at statistics and demographics, we not only limit our perception, we also commit ourselves to ignorance and stunt the growth of civilization. Numbers can tell you a lot, but they cannot speak for people better than they can themselves.

When you see a liberal cuck kvetching this hard at a piece of news, it feels “just right“! Mhh, mmhhh, mhhh! Delicious!

Yeah, obviously, using large amounts of statistic to predict future outcomes work. If it didn’t, then insurance companies would go bankrupt overnight. Liberals have no problems with insurance companies, right? Unless, of course, the insurance companies would charge higher premiums to black drivers (which they obviously would if it wasn’t illegal).

The thing is, using science to determine sentencing will always be racially discriminatory, because brown people suck, and society would be way safer if they’d all be locked up. But these cucks don’t care about the facts, only “muh feelings.” Well, guess what, cucks: hardcore Nazism is just plain old science, and your feelings are about to be ignored on a massive scale.

Let the reveling begin!

Thankfully – or perhaps not – Pussy Riot is no longer a band. They are simply everyday disgruntled sluts trying to destroy civilization for the Jews. It is interesting, perhaps, that I never understood how they were a band in the first place, given that they do not play instruments and don’t have any songs.

In a recent press conference, Nadya Tolokonnikova said “We are not Pussy Riot now.”

“We can promote our cause without playing any shows,” Maria Alyokhina added. “And we will never play any shows for money.”

Despite the fact that they are suspiciously more attractive than they were going into prison, suggesting that the Russian female prison system is similar to some type of luxury spa, they have made the boring decision to focus their present efforts on complaining about their time in prison, saying “waaahhhh, it is really bad to be in prison for committing a crime, waaahhh, people shouldn’t have to do that.”

Specifically, Nadya is outraged by the fact that she was forced to sew uniforms while incarcerated, claiming in a letter published by the Guardian in September that it was suspiciously similar to the Jewish Holocaust:

A threatening, anxious atmosphere pervades the work zone. Eternally sleep-deprived, overwhelmed by the endless race to fulfill inhumanly large quotas, prisoners are always on the verge of breaking down, screaming at each other, fighting over the smallest things. Just recently, a young woman got stabbed in the head with a pair of scissors because she didn’t turn in a pair of pants on time. Another tried to cut her own stomach open with a hacksaw. They stopped her.

No doubt accustomed to making a living laying on her back [NSFW], I can understand how she was so traumatized by being forced to push buttons and hold pieces of cloth, but these undocumented and unverifiable claims regarding scissor stabbings and attempted suicide by hacksaw stomach-slash strike me as rather unbelievable.

I wonder if any “political activists” were made into soap or lampshades in this horrible Sewocaust?

During their Friday whine-fest, the girls also suggested that the Jew criminal Khodorkovsky replace Putin as president.

Speaking on Putin, Tolokonnikova said: “I think he believes that Western countries are a threat, that it’s a big bad world out there where houses walk on chicken legs and there is a global Masonic conspiracy. I don’t want to live in this terrifying fairytale.”

Instead of asking her what the hell she meant by implying Western countries were not a threat to Russia, she was asked who she would like to replace Putin, to which she replied “I’d like to offer Mikhail Borisovich [Khodorkovsky] the job.”

Her comrade then confirmed that she also would like to place a Jewish criminal as president of Russia.

More Pointless Sub-Cultural Icons for a Pointless Sub-Cultural Society

The girls’ first interview was fun.  It was with slutty anti-Putin socialite turned television star, Ksenia Sobchak, who bills herself as Russia’s Paris Hilton.

It appears to have been a setup to make the Pussy Rioters appear more reasonable than they actually are by sitting them next to a totally unhinged woman.

The three sat around and drank tea while Sobchak asked them how much they were worth, if it was sexist that Nadya was focused on more because of her luscious lips, and what they think the meaning of life is, before closing the interview by reading from a book about Nietzsche.

Buzzfeed did a pretty funny piece about it.

Here’s the entire thing (without subtitles).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDBnFsZ_jyo#t=21

These two women (who do not want to be called Pussy Riot, but whose names we cannot pronounce) are now global cultural icons.  Regrettably.  Putin has released them not simply on the Russian people, but on all of us.

What do they want?

What are they actually even talking about?

Which Jews are funding them?

The same ones funding Femen, who appear to be part of the same unclear sexual/political/anti-religious agenda against the Slavic race?

Only time will tell.

The person being interviewed here is Rudolf Hausmann, senior state prosecutor in Berlin, in charge of the Intensive Offenders Unit within the state prosecutor’s office.

FOCUS Online: Young, male, foreign roots – is that what the typical intensive offender looks like?

Hausmann: In principle: yes. 80 per cent of the intensive offenders in Berlin have an immigrant background. Most of them – 43 per cent – are of Arab origin, 32 per cent of Turkish origin.

FOCUS Online: Why do these groups especially cause so much trouble?

Hausmann: It doesn’t concern these groups as a whole. It would be wrong to say: All Turks and Arab boys are like that.

FOCUS Online: We’ve never said that …

Hausmann:  … okay. I will just say: sweeping generalisations are unjust to the majority of well-integrated youth. A differentiation must be made.

FOCUS Online: Right. But it remains true that youths from the Kurdish-Turkish and Arab milieus make up the majority of intensive offenders. Why is that?

Hausmann: Sons from large Arab families mostly experience being raised in an archaic style in which physical violence also plays a major role. Unlike their sisters, everything is permitted to them. The parents impose no limits on them. They tolerate it when their boys don’t go to school and instead beat their way through life with their fists. That’s a huge problem.

FOCUS Online: A problem especially for the mostly German victims …

Hausmann: We must attempt everything to stop this development. It’s not uncommon for the families we are talking about here to have eight, nine, ten children. If the three oldest brothers have fallen into intensive offending, why should the fifth youngest then stick to the law? They have internalised the use of violence to such an extent that from time to time incredible crimes result.

Source: Focus

Notice how he’s reluctant to talk about it but is pressed on the issue by journalists doing their job for once.

Press TV
September 19, 2013

According to a first-of-its-kind study conducted by Mayors Against Illegal Guns, convicted felons, domestic abusers and other criminals were among those seeking guns on Armslist.com, a popular weapons website dubbed the “Craigslist for weapons.”

Investigators examined “want-to-buy” postings on the site, which was launched in 2009. The postings were made by people detailing exactly what type of gun they wanted.

The study found that unlike gun purchases at a registered gun dealership, online buyers are not subject to background checks, a loophole that’s being exploited every day by criminals.

Since the website sells about 790,000 weapons a year, that means as many as 25,000 guns could be sold annually to buyers with criminal records, the study said.

Read More