BREAKING: UN INVESTIGATION STATES THAT ISRAEL COMMITTED THE CRIME OF EXTERMINATION

An independent UN investigation has concluded that Israel committed crimes against humanity during the war in Gaza, including the crime of “extermination”.

“EXTERMINATION” !!!! pic.twitter.com/dqjpiOEb0Y

— Khalissee (@Kahlissee) June 12, 2024

When your rape stories are so goofy you can’t even get the UN to throw you a bone, you need to go back to the rape hoax drawing board and invent better rape hoaxes.

“Angel Face got decapitated with a shovel and then her head rolled past me” should have been left on the rape hoax cutting room floor, I can tell you that much.

Reuters:

Both Israel and Hamas committed war crimes in the early stages of the Gaza war, a U.N. inquiry found on Wednesday, saying that Israel’s actions also constituted crimes against humanity because of the immense civilian losses.

The findings were from two parallel reports, one focusing on the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks and another on Israel’s military response, published by the U.N. Commission of Inquiry (COI), which has an unusually broad mandate to collect evidence and identify perpetrators of international crimes committed in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories.

…

Israel also committed additional war crimes including starvation as a method of warfare, it said, saying Israel not only failed to provide essential supplies like food, water, shelter and medicine to Gazans but “acted to prevent the supply of those necessities by anyone else”.

Some of the war crimes such as murder also constituted crimes against humanity by Israel, the COI statement said, using a term reserved for the most serious international crimes knowingly committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against civilians.

“The immense numbers of civilian casualties in Gaza and widespread destruction of civilian objects and infrastructure were the inevitable result of a strategy undertaken with intent to cause maximum damage, disregarding the principles of distinction, proportionality and adequate precautions,” the COI statement said.

Sometimes, the evidence gathered by such U.N.-mandated bodies has formed the basis for war crimes prosecutions and could be drawn on by the International Criminal Court.

…

Among the findings in the 59-page report on the Oct. 7 attacks, the commission verified four incidents of mass killings in public shelters which it said suggests militants had “standing operational instructions”. It also identified “a pattern of sexual violence” by Palestinian armed groups but could not independently verify reports of rape.

There isn’t even a “pattern of sexual violence.”

Typically, I would probably go ahead and agree that “rape usually takes place during war,” because based on what I know, that appears to be generally true.

But this was not a war. It was just a quick jailbreak and a hostage taking expedition. The whole October 7th event lasted only hours. All the video demonstrates that the Hamas guys who knew what they were doing were entirely focused on hostage taking. Some of them moved pretty professionally. It just doesn’t make sense that they were like “okay, okay – let’s all take a rape break.”

Furthermore, Hamas is an Islamic organization, and rape during war is against Islamic law. Obviously, that doesn’t mean that Moslems don’t ever rape during wars, but during a disciplined single day operation like this… it’s just not something that seems very likely at all.

And there is no evidence.

Israel invading forces are holding Palestinian families at gunpoint, then destroying the homes in Hebron in the occupied West Bank…

Netanyahu has ordered the demolition of over 3,500 Palestinian homes that will be used for settlements…

WE ARE WITNESSING A GENOCIDE…🇵🇸💔 pic.twitter.com/durialyvBN

— Pelham (@Resist_05) June 11, 2024

Elvis Dunderhoff contributed to this article. 

First they arm terrorists to overthrow you.

Then you fight back.

Then they charge you with war crimes for fighting back against their terrorists.

I wonder if this has anything to do with the trouble in Palestine?

It’s interesting timing, no?

The Guardian:

A French court has issued an international arrest warrant for the Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad for complicity in war crimes against humanity linked to chemical weapon attacks on civilians.

Three others – including Assad’s brother Maher, head of an elite army unit – are also subject to warrants over the use of banned sarin gas in two attacks in August 2013 that killed more than 1,000 people, including hundreds of children.

Hey, I remember this (video from 10 years ago)

Campaigners seeking justice for the killings hailed as “a historic moment” what is believed to be the first time a sitting head of state has been the subject of an arrest warrant in another country for crimes against humanity.

“The French judiciary’s issuance of arrest warrants against the head of state, Bashar al-Assad, and his associates constitutes a historic judicial precedent. It is a new victory for the victims, their families and the survivors, and a step on the path to justice and sustainable peace in Syria,” said the lawyer Mazen Darwish, founder and director general of the Syrian Centre for Media and Freedom of Expression (SCM), a civil party to the case.

Investigating judges from the crimes against humanity division of the Paris judicial court have been investigating the chemical attacks in Syria since April 2021. The investigation was sparked after a civil party complaint from three organisations: the SCM, the Open Society Justice Initiative, and Syrian Archive, a Syrian-led project documenting human rights violations and other crimes committed in Syria.

Similar civil cases against the Damascus regime have been lodged with courts in Sweden and Germany.

As well as Bashar al-Assad and Maher al-Assad, the much feared de facto leader of the regime’s 4th Armoured division, the French court on Wednesday issued warrants for the arrest of Gen Ghassan Abbas, director of Branch 450 of the Syrian Scientific Studies and Research Centre (SSRC), and Gen Bassam al-Hassan, presidential adviser for strategic affairs and liaison officer between the presidential palace and the SSRC.

The arrest warrants make the legal charge of complicity in crimes against humanity and war crimes against all four.

Steve Kostas, senior managing lawyer at the Open Society Justice Initiative, said: “This is the first time a sitting head of state has been the subject of an arrest warrant in another country for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

“This is a historic moment – with this case, France has an opportunity to establish the principle that there is no immunity for the most serious international crimes, even at the highest level.”

The thing they’re saying happened did not, in fact, actually happen.

It’s been proved.

Plus, I mean… just think about it for 2 seconds: Assad is under an invasion by a foreign power, so we’re claiming that while in the midst of rallying his people to fight back, he inexplicably and for no reason (these people do not even offer a reason) decided to start gassing his own people?

It’s not reasonable to expect rational people to believe that a rational man would do that. It does not make any sense.

Nobody other than these NGOs seems to care

Faggots are the ones committing the crime against humanity.

Do you have any idea what they do?

They stick their fists into each others buttholes. This is something they do. They probably do it daily. It is sadistic. The entire homosexual community is about becoming sexually stimulated by causing pain to other people. A desire to cause harm is the underlining aspect of homosexuality, much more than anything sexual. It is sexual because the homos associate hurting other people with sexuality.

They call it “love,” but these people are satanic monsters. At least the ones doing the ramming are satanic monsters. The ones getting rammed are broken children who feel their only worth is in submitting themselves to violent, hateful abuse.

Life Site News:

The United Nations (UN) is considering the adoption of a treaty that would defend homosexual lifestyles and may lead to the addition of so-called “homophobia” to the classification of a crime against humanity.

A document titled “Draft Articles on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity” is the unofficial treaty that has removed a long-accepted definition of gender as male and female, leaving open the possibility of defending the truth about gender and sex to qualify as a crime against humanity in the form of targeting LGBT people.

The draft treaty proposes changes that are both consistent with and in opposition to the 1999 Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court and includes persecution on the basis of gender as a crime against humanity. However, the statute also states that “the term ‘gender’ refers to the two sexes, male and female, within the context of society. The term ‘gender’ does not indicate any meaning different from the above.”

Contrary to the long-accepted treaty, the draft under debate in the current session has removed this definition of gender and emphasized the broad classification of a crime against humanity as a means to include LGBT people as populations to be protected.

“For the purpose of the present draft articles, ‘crime against humanity’ means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population,” the document states. Specified crimes fall under various categories, including sexual violence, enslavement, and discrimination.

“The word ‘any’ indicates that ‘civilian population’ is to have a wide definition and hence should be interpreted broadly,” the document continues. “An attack can be committed against any civilians, ‘regardless of their nationality, ethnicity or other distinguishing feature,’ and can be committed against either nationals or foreigners.”

“Those targeted may ‘include a group defined by its (perceived) political affiliation’,” the draft added.

According to the Center for Family and Human Rights, or C-Fam, the European Union and the United States are “pushing the General Assembly to adopt the new treaty” while other countries, including Morocco, many nations in the African Group, Egypt, the Russian Federation and Pakistan rejected the proposal. The Holy See also criticized the treaty, stating that it “regrets the ILC’s (International Law Commission) decision” to remove the true definition of gender from the draft.

The draft treaty, which was originally published in 2019, is currently under debate in the UN General Assembly. A decision about whether the treaty will move forward is expected by the end of November.

The Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR), a branch of the UN that provides research and advice regarding human rights issues within countries, previously released a letter that expressed concern about the “outdated” definition of gender used in the Rome Statute and requesting that the definition be removed.

“In order for such a text [the crimes against humanity treaty] to be constructive it must reflect current definitions for terms used to describe human rights protections and abuses under international law, including for the definition of gender,” the letter states.

“We therefore urge the International Law Commission to either remove the definition of gender … of the draft crimes against humanity convention (since no other persecutory category comes with a definition) or to insist on the social construction of gender as it is widely recognized to be.”

How are we supposed to raise children in a world where this kind of derangement is celebrated as morally good?

If the schools are teaching your kids to be gay, and it’s illegal for you to tell them to not be gay, what options do you have?

Only serious people work at the UN