I don’t know if running for 26 miles is good for your kid.

But I do know cutting his dick off is stunning and brave.

NBC New York:

A Kentucky couple who ran a marathon with their 6-year-old son says they are being investigated by Child Protective Services (CPS).

YouTubers Ben and Kami Crawford, who have six children, announced in an Instagram post that CPS showed up at their home on Saturday.

“Someone reported that we dragged Rainier after mile 13 and across the finish line, pulling him against his will,” the Crawfords wrote.

“Our hours of footage reveal a different story — that Rainier is young human who was very determined to finish and was never dragged ONCE on the entire 26.2 mile course,” they added.

Earlier this month, the Crawfords stated on Instagram that “CPS has investigated us for doing much crazier things and deemed us safe parents for our kids.”

The little boy completed the Flying Pig marathon in Cincinnati, Ohio, in 8 hours and 35 minutes. The Crawfords acknowledged that he was “crying” and “struggling physically” toward the end. The Crawfords said they “asked him numerous times if he wanted to stop and he was VERY clear that his preference was to continue.”

They noted they did not see any sign of heat exhaustion or dehydration.

Two-time Olympian Kara Goucher expressed concerns for Rainier’s emotional and physical well-being.

“I don’t know who needs to hear this but a six year old cannot fathom what a marathon will do to them physically,” Goucher wrote on Twitter. “A six year old does not understand what embracing misery is. A six year old who is ‘struggling physically’ does not realize they have the right to stop and should.”

I'm not questioning motivation or saying it is bad parenting. But as an Olympic athlete, I promise you this is not good for the child. Children are children. Let them run around, but as the parent you need to protect their growing bodies and their young minds.

— Kara Goucher (@karagoucher) May 4, 2022

Ben Crawford defended their decision to let the little boy run the race, telling TODAY Parents on Wednesday, “Some of the kids have been having emotional breakdowns because of all the hate and judgment from people declaring they shouldn’t be allowed to run, and fear from CPS coming to our house.”

Performance coach Steve Magness, who wrote “The Science of Running,” agrees with Goucher.

“No good comes out of a child that young running for 8+ hours. It’s dangerous, physically and psychologically,” Magness tweeted. “Kids want to be loved. They’ll endure crazy things for mom/dad’s approval. Parents: Stop pressuring kids to live out your dreams.”

Magness told TODAY Parents there’s not really good research on how activities like a marathon affect a child’s body.

“It’s rare to see such activity, so there’s little good science. But, we do know that putting a rapidly developing and growing body under stress that it’s in no way prepared for isn’t a wise move, and can potentially lead to injury,” Magness said in an interview. “More importantly, from a psychological standpoint, a 6-year-old doesn’t yet have the capacity to know what they’re getting into with a marathon. They don’t have the autonomy to say no. A child just wants attention, support, and love from mom and dad.”

It’s probably not good for the kid.

But come on.

Parents are cutting their kids’ dicks off and CPS is taking the kids if the parents try to stop the hormone injections.

This is fine though

We continue to see that Democrats are not fundamentally anti-cop any more than they are fundamentally anti-gun.

Reason:

If there’s one thing the public school system shouldn’t be doing right now, it’s making life even more hellishly difficult for parents. And yet many teachers in the state of Massachusetts are contacting the authorities to report parents for suspected child abuse when kids fail to show up for Zoom classes.

“Massachusetts school officials have reported dozens of families to state social workers for possible neglect charges because of issues related to their children’s participation in remote learning classes during the pandemic shutdown in the spring,” The Boston Globe reported on Saturday.

The infuriating article is worth reading in full. The Globe spoke with several parents who have received calls and visits from the state Department of Children and Families (DCF). The department has the power to remove children from their homes and place them in foster care if agents suspect that kids are being mistreated, abused, or neglected—and DCF considers distance-learning no-shows to be possible abuse cases. DCF lists numerous circumstances in which teachers should feel obliged to call the cops, among them kids appearing tired or hungry during Zoom sessions.

Working parents who have no choice but to leave their young children in the care of a sibling, or let them fend for themselves, will be particularly vulnerable to unfounded child services investigations. This isn’t a theoretical concern. Consider the case of Em Quiles, who

struggled to work her full-time job while overseeing her young son’s schooling. During remote class time, her 7-year-old was largely supervised by his teenage brother, who had his own school work to do.

Quiles said she told staff at Heard Street Discovery Academy in Worcester in the spring that her work schedule made it tough to assist with virtual schooling and she struggled to navigate the school’s online platforms. “They didn’t offer any help,” she said.

Then in June, Quiles was stunned to receive a call from the state’s Department of Children and Families. The school had accused Quiles of neglect, she was told, because the 7-year-old missed class and homework assignments.

Another mother, a Spanish-speaking immigrant, requested a virtual meting with a school councillor to discuss her son’s behavioral difficulties, which had worsened during pandemic-induced isolation. A few days after she spoke with the counselor, DCF called the mom. Someone at the school—possibly the counselor—had accused the mom of “general neglect” based on “behaviors observed or disclosed during remote learning.” The agency spent weeks investigating the matter, interrogating the mother and her son on everything from “the contents of her refrigerator to her son’s sleeping location.” The allegation was eventually dismissed.

A third parent—Christi Brouder, a single mother of four kids—faced frequent threats from teachers that DCF would intervene if the children didn’t improve their virtual attendance. Once, when her 10-year-old daughter was tuned in to Zoom class, Brouder’s autistic six-year-old son leapt naked in front of the screen. Predictably, the school called the cops:

Later that day, Brouder received a call from the Department of Children and Families. The social worker informed her that school staff had reported a naked adult male exposing himself on the computer.

Brouder explained that she lives alone with her four young children and that the nude male was only 6.

She was relieved when the social worker told her the case wouldn’t go anywhere. The school district, however, wasn’t ready to drop the issue. The head of Haverhill’s special-education department told Brouder that afternoon they had contacted the city police department “due to the severity of the allegations,” according to Brouder.

The goal here is to drive you over the edge.

Deep breaths, people.

We’ve gotta hold it together. We don’t have a choice.

All over the west, child protective services are used as an extra-judicial vigilante organization to punish people who the state doesn’t like. They do this by kidnapping people’s children and sending them to orphanages, where those children put in poor conditions.

This process is used to take away the children of nationalists, but also of simple Christians who transmit traditional values to their children.

Never forget: Our enemies wouldn’t hesitate to kidnap your kids and send them to a place like this.

The original point of the CPS was to protect children against abusive parents. The problem, of course, is that truly abusive parents are extremely rare. Thus, these organisations wouldn’t have a reason to exist unless they started going after good people as well.

So now we have a system in which spineless bureaucrats have the power to take away anyone’s kids with little recourse, at their leisure.

These people must be stopped, and retribution exacted for their crimes.

As we have said many times, the Crown Prosecution Service is not fit for purpose and needs to be scrapped. They are obsessed with “diversity” and will spare no expense at prosecuting white people for even minor criticism of Islam or immigration. How much did this bullshit case cost?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/8404212.stm

The Liverpool hoteliers who were dragged through court for disagreeing with a Muslim woman. Its disgusting that the police even bothered arresting them for such a pathetic complaint but even more disgusting that some “pc” moron in the CPS thought there was a realistic prospect of a conviction. If the judge had not seen sense they may be in prison now, and for what?

The zeal they have for prosecuting racial cases does not apply when the suspect is ethnic.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1270021/British-Muslim-daubs-war-memorial-Islamic-slogans–CPS-says-NOT-racially-motivated.html

If that graffiti was not racially motivated what is?

Meanwhile Emma West is remanded in custody for having a drunken rant on a train, and the CPS are going after her with a vengeance, but then shes white, so shes fair game.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16051120

The CPS failed to prosecute the Leicester Somalis who viciously assaulted a white woman while shouting “kill the white slag”, why?

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/3990071/I-darent-go-out-since-race-attack.html

We get an insight from an email we received from an ex employee of the CPS

“Under the direction of the “Director of Diversity” it was decided they could earn brownie points by downgrading all the senior caseworker posts and making them junior posts. Ostensibly this was to cut the wage bill. It also had the effect of getting rid of all part-timers and anybody with a family friendly work pattern. The Family friendly policy was SO last year! Nearly 1000 of us went in the department in the course of a year. But it had the secondary effect of ridding the department of experienced, mature staff, who were mostly white, because we had been there since the 80s and the junior replacements were recruited with ‘diversity’ criteria in mind. I had got used to not hearing English spoken around me on the tube – during this period I started to find the same thing in the office lift and canteen queue”

The above cases and this from an ex employee PROVE that the CPS has become a politically correct organisation who are clearly not interested in prosecuting anyone for racial offences other than white people. It should be scrapped. End of.

One law for all

Suzy