Harvard Law Professor Adrian Vermeule

It’s not just virus and pandemic experts who have something to say about your rights.

Law experts also have something to say about what you’re allowed and not allowed to do.

In this case, a Harvard Law Professor says that this coronavirus “pandemic” is a great opportunity to update the Constitution — and by “update the Constitution” I mean tearing it apart and writing some Jewish gibberish on top of it.

Breitbart:

Harvard Law Professor Adrian Vermeule suggests using the Chinese virus pandemic as an excuse to establish a new interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, implementing policies that do away with concepts such as “free speech ideology” and “property rights.”

Adrian Vermeule, a professor of constitutional law at Harvard Law School, recently wrote a piece for the Atlantic in which he argues that traditional interpretations of the U.S. constitution have “now outlived its utility,” and that it is now time for the government to take a more centralized role in people’s lives.

Vermeule argues that “circumstances have now changed” due to the Chinese virus pandemic, and that it is now possible to imagine “moral” constitutionalism, which he says is not “enslaved to the original meaning of the Constitution,” and is also “liberated” from the narrative of “relentless expansion of individualistic autonomy.”

The professor is advocating for a new interpretation of the U.S. constitution, which he refers to as “common-good constitutionalism.”

“Such an approach,” wrote Vermeule, “should be based on the principles that government helps direct persons, associations, and society generally toward the common good, and that strong rule in the interest of attaining the common good is entirely legitimate.”

Vermeule also scrutinizes “the libertarian assumptions central to free-speech law and free-speech ideology,” which he says is “forbidden to judge the quality and moral worth of public speech,” and therefore, should “fall under the ax.”

The law professor even goes as far as stating that “property rights and economic rights will also have to go,” because they “bar the state from enforcing duties of community and solidarity in the use and distribution of resources.”

Vermeule claims that this “global pandemic” makes for the perfect opportunity to implement such strategies that grow government, insisting that “it has become clear that a just governing order must have ample power to cope with large-scale crises of public health and well-being.”

The professor also noted that when he says the government should get involved in “health,” he is referring to that “in many senses, not only literal and physical but also metaphorical and social.”

Vermeule even acknowledges that “the central aim of the constitutional order is to promote good rule, not to ‘protect liberty’ as an end in itself,” and that one common-good principle will be “that no constitutional right to refuse vaccination exists.”

The Constitution and people’s rights were never based on circumstance, and the government, of course, is full of incompetent politicians who listen to incompetent experts mumble about coronavirus being a deadly virus despite the fact that all data indicates that the virus is as dangerous as the flu — so how can we even entertain the idea that these incompetent “experts” have any idea about what the common good is and how to achieve it?

Besides, the common good for whom?

White America, the real Americans, or the new Americans?

If these experts dislike the United States and its constitution so much, they are welcome to go build a new country in some uninhabited island somewhere.

They can implement their lunatic ideas and their “no right to refuse vaccination exists” principle there, and see how many people choose to go there.

Of course, no one would willingly go to such a country, which is why they’re trying to turn the country virtually everyone in the world would love to be in into this weird satanic nightmare where the behind-the-scenes people controlling the government have total control over the population.

You’d have rights if you’d stayed in Mexico, Pedro. Then, a cop randomly shooting you would have been ruled illegal – if only the judge didn’t get bribed, which he for sure would be.

One thing we’ve repeated over and over again here on the Stormer is that illegal invaders have absolutely no Constitutional rights.

In fact, they don’t even have any of those hoax “human rights” either, since they’re not legally human. They have no legal status at all. At best, they might qualify for animal protection laws, since – just like fauna – they don’t have any identification.

But even a dog can legally be shot if it attacks a cop. So the idea that cops can’t just shoot illegals whenever they want is absurd.

It’s a good thing a government body finally has the courage to state this obvious fact.

Insider:

Two years ago, police officers arrived at a Mississippi home in the middle of the night to execute a warrant. But they knocked on the wrong person’s door, a commotion ensued, and they shot the homeowner in the back of the head, state investigators said.

Now, the city of Southaven has argued in a legal brief that the man, Ismael Lopez, was not protected by the US Constitution because he was an undocumented immigrant.

“It is the most absurd thing in the world,” Aaron Neglia, a lawyer for Lopez’s wife, told Insider. “What [they’re] saying is that because this man is undocumented, it’s okay to kill him?”

Yeah, that’s exactly right.

Now that that’s out of the way, nothing is stopping the people of America from making my favorite Carpenter Brut music video into a reality.

It’s not actually my favorite one, but you get my point.

And by the way, this is my favorite one:

Closely followed by this one:

But they’re all good, honestly.

Attorneys for Lopez’s family have filed a civil lawsuit over the shooting, and are seeking $20 million in damages for Lopez’s widow, Claudia Linares. They have argued that Lopez was the victim of one of the worst police shootings in recent memory — akin to Walter Scott, an unarmed black man who was shot in the back in 2015 while he ran from a white police officer.

But the city, the Southaven Police Department, and the Mississippi Bureau of Investigation have alleged that the officers opened fire on Lopez after he pointed a .22-caliber rifle at them — an allegation Lopez’s lawyers deny.

Okay, so the cops just barged in on the wrong guy. And then what? They just shot him out of nowhere?

Who believes this?

He obviously went nuts and started getting violent before getting shot.

Anyway, none of that even matters – the cops can just shoot beaners on sight any time they want since – and this is now confirmed – they have no constitutional rights.

Problem?

We can only pray that the case is brought up to the supreme court in order to confirm this once and for all.

HOLY FUCKING SHIT MAN LOOK AT THIS.

Wait, wrong video.

THIS

I don’t know why USA Today didn’t add the STYX song to that video, the narration is shit. Play both at the same time for maximum understanding of this tragedy.

I have long warned of the dangers of Duck Boats.

What is a Duck Boat, you ask?

It’s also known as a car-boat or, more commonly, a boat-car.

I don’t know if it’s known as that, but that’s what I called it when I was giving my warnings.

I said to anyone who would listen: “a thing that is made for the road is not meant for the sea, and so true is the reverse.”

Daily Mail:

Four more bodies have been pulled from the water where a duck boat capsized on Thursday night, bringing the total death toll from the tragedy to 17.

All of the victims were on board the Ride the Ducks amphibious vessel when a powerful storm rolled over the lake, lashing the water with 60mph winds at around 7pm.

You can ride the ducks, you can ride the lightening.

But you can’t ride a Missouri lake.

My friends, the Missouri lake will ride you. And your shitty boat-car, which is an abomination mankind never should have invented.

Fourteen people survived, including the boat’s captain. Seven people were hospitalized with injuries.

Those who died range in age from one to 70. Among them was the boat’s driver.

Search and rescue teams sectioned off part of the lake to continue their recovery of the four missing bodies on Friday morning.

The first 11 bodies were found on Thursday night and six more were recovered the next day.

The lake which is 229ft seep and has a surface area of 43,100 acres was partially reopened to the public on Friday morning.

Now, authorities must bring the boat wreckage back to the shore to investigate why it failed.

I can tell you right now why it failed: mankind was never intended to dabble in such things.

Never intended to mix the boat with the car.

I am hereby calling on Congress to repeal the Duck Boat Amendment.

The Duck Boat Amendment was from a previous age, before the invention of bridges, when people had to drive across rivers to get to work in the morning. Never was the Duck Boat intended for riding the ducks.

The Constitution is a living document.

Seventeen people are now dead because Congress is too afraid to take on the Duck Boat lobby.

Prominent leader of the Anti-Semitic National Duck Boat Association Bill Paxton makes millions off of death.

I am hereby declaring a million man march on Washington to repeal the Duck Boat Amendment, and do door-to-door searches to confiscate and destroy Duck Boats.

The killing must end.

The ACLU is taking important measures to ensure the constitutional rights of American citizens.

What Trump is doing with this tranny ban is violating their right to free expression. There has never been and is not currently any other case of a major constitutional violation that sets a worse precedent or has worse long term effects on the First Amendment.

Absolutely none.

I’m happy we have such impartial and even handed organizations like the ACLU in America defending human rights and democracy.

After all, the Founding Fathers explicitly said: “Thou shalt never move to disbar thine chicks with dick fromst thine militia.”