Donald Trump is trying to vaccinate the world against the woke mind virus, but the Europeans are having a negative reaction to the vaccine and having woke myocarditis from the DNA changes caused by this Warp Speed vaccine against woke.

Now these wokies in Europe are claiming that women don’t have to have sex with their husbands.

Do women have to do anything in the woke world?

The Guardian:

A woman who refuses to have sex with her husband should not be considered “at fault” by courts in the event of divorce, Europe’s highest human rights court has said, condemning France.

The European court of human rights (ECHR) sided on Thursday with a 69-year-old French woman whose husband had obtained a divorce on the grounds that she was the only person at fault because she had stopped having sexual relations with him.

The ECHR held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of the woman’s right to respect for private and family life as part of the European convention on human rights.

What about the human rights of men to have sex?

What wokie wookie wrote this law?

The woke kikes?

It ruled against France, saying a woman who refuses to have sex with her husband should not be considered “at fault” by courts in the event of divorce.

The court identified the woman only by the initials HW, saying she lived in Le Chesnay in the western suburbs of Paris. The woman did not contest the divorce, which she had also sought, but rather complained about the grounds on which it had been granted by a French court.

The Strasbourg-based ECHR said any concept of marital duties needed to take into account “consent” as the basis for sexual relations.

“The court concluded that the very existence of such a marital obligation ran counter to sexual freedom, [and] the right to bodily autonomy,” a court statement said. “The applicant’s husband could have petitioned for divorce, submitting the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as the principal ground, and not, as he had done, as an alternative ground.”

Woke women are refusing to have children, and the governments are complaining about that and offering them endless bribes and meanwhile they are so woke they won’t enforce men’s right to sex!

The woke mind virus is going to obliterate Europe and then people will realize that woke was wrong and they will realize patriots were right for forcing women to have sex.

The leader of Edinburgh city council has been suspended by the Labour Party amid reports he sent Ukrainian refugees messages asking about their sexual preferences.

Police say they are investigating a report of inappropriate behaviour regarding Cammy Day.https://t.co/Vy6v2lqmDC pic.twitter.com/4dhJDcGtnr

— STV News (@STVNews) December 8, 2024

What does this even mean?

He’s not allowed to do only dating?

How is that illegal?

What does the fact that these women were Ukrainian have to do with anything at all?

RT:

Edinburgh City Council head Cammy Day has been suspended following accusations of sending sexually explicit messages to Ukrainian women, BBC Scotland reported on Sunday, citing Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar.

The Sunday Mail had earlier reported that Day, who represents the Labour party, had been texting the women to ask about their sexual preferences, trying to meet for dates and making compliments about their looks.

…

According to several refugees, as cited by the Sunday Mail, it was impossible to ignore the unwelcome advances by the Labour politician due to his high position.

What?

One individual who fled Ukraine shortly after the escalation of the military conflict in 2022 told the news outlet that the 50-year old politician bombarded her with messages when she arrived in Edinburgh.

The messages, seen by the tabloid, show Day “asking sexually explicit questions, sending love heart and kissing emojis and repeatedly asking […] to meet up for wine.” In addition, the politician allegedly contacted refugees on a dating app where the messages were “more sexually explicit.”

…

Another refugee, who has now left Edinburgh, confirmed having received multiple messages from Day via social media and dating sites while staying in the city.

“He started following me then sent lots of emojis and reactions to posts and asked to meet up. It was too much and I didn’t know how to say I didn’t want him to contact me anymore because of his position.”

Oh, so it’s “power dynamics” AKA “communism” again.

Okay.

I can tell you the real reason he was fired: fat, old British women do not want older and established men having the option of dating younger, thiner Ukraine women. That was his crime. If he was doing only dating with fat, old British women, or blacks, he would face no sanction. Obviously. I think that should be obvious.

The pussy cartel in Western Europe is having a hard time dealing with the all these Ukrainian women coming in and blowing their racket. So destroying this guy’s life for literally doing completely normal online dating, with women who made themselves available on a dating app, is sending a message that this will not be tolerated. Men will be punished.

The suggestion that this guy was harassing women or forcing himself on them is just retarded, as is the suggestion that he wasn’t going to find a Ukraine woman who was interested in him. Of course he would have found such a woman. If he couldn’t find one, there would be no need to bring down the hammer on him.

DEVELOPING: A former Green Hill security guard charged with sex crimes involving inmate.

The inmate’s attorneys says he was terrified she would “punish him and harm him if he rejected her advances.”@RyanTVnews reports.

MORE: https://t.co/dEXgTerfP1#KOMONews pic.twitter.com/cXqSYNh5R2

— Holly Menino (@hollymenino) October 18, 2024

The 23-year-old is just a child who didn’t know what a vagina was?

I will grant you that he was “vulnerable” in that he had been locked in a cage since he was a teenager and had no access to sex and was therefore willing to have sex with a she-beast. But I mean, he was probably black and would have done it anyway.

The bitch should obviously be fired, but what exactly is this other than a workplace violation?

Why is the US government so utterly obsessed with regulating heterosexual sexual behaviors, even whilst they are normalizing the more satanic forms of sodomy?

New York Post:

A corrections officer at a juvenile facility in Washington allegedly groomed an inmate and forced him to record their sexual rendezvous — fearing the sexual deviant would punish or harm him if he refused, according to police and prosecutors.

Michelle Goodman, 31, was arrested on Wednesday for convincing the 23-year-old inmate to record their sexual trysts in the bathroom of the Green Hill School in Chehalis, a state-run rehabilitation center that houses older male youth and young adults who committed crimes as children.

Prosecutors said the alleged sexual predator was also captured on surveillance footage taking the victim to a staff locker area in the facility on two separate occasions in January 2024, according to court documents obtained by KOMO News.

Chehalis police launched their investigation after receiving reports that a female correctional officer was involved with a male inmate, authorities announced in a Facebook post.

Investigators contacted the inmate’s attorney, who provided numerous screenshots of the two engaged in sexual acts together, including sex.

…

The lawsuit alleges that “Goodman repeatedly wanted to be filmed performing oral sex and having intercourse,” according to KOMO News, with the inmate’s attorney arguing he was terrified Goodman would “punish him and harm him if he rejected her advances.”

Yeah, okay. The guy who had been locked in prison for years didn’t want sex. Okay. It’s abuse. Okay.

This is retarded.

This 23-year-old inmate had been in prison for at least six years, because the fact he was still in juvie means he was incarcerated as a minor. It’s probably longer, based on the length of the sentence and the fact he was not tried as an adult. Most likely, this was a black who committed a murder under the age of 14, so he’s probably been in for ten years. Who here among you can say with conviction they would not hit that she-beast after being locked in a cage for this long?

At no time ever in human history have we had the kind of celebration of sexual deviancy that we have right now. People will bring up ancient Greece or Roman decadence, but that was limited to elite groups and was not widely celebrated. It was also only pederasty, which is an adult male with a teen boy. They were not doing gay orgies in the streets, like with these “pride parades,” and they were not taking toddlers to be indoctrinated at “tranny story time.” They were not teaching gay anal in school. They sure as hell were not selling babies to homosexuals. Frankly, even in Greece or Rome (or Japan, the anal capital of earth), “homosexuality” didn’t really even exist, it was simply that otherwise heterosexual men would have anal sex with teen boys.

Note: Prostitution was outlawed in Europe at various points during the Middle Ages, but not on the basis of morality, but rather to deal with the spread of venereal disease. 

Just so, at no time ever in human history was heterosexual sex regulated to this extent. In Christian culture, two unmarried heterosexuals engaging in sex, regardless of age, was a matter for the individuals involved to take up with the Church. The government had nothing to say about an immorality involving two individuals where no one is physically harmed. Even in Islam, where religion and state have traditionally been much more integrated, the punishment for two unmarried people having sex has only been a beating, not years in prison.

Adultery has generally always been a crime, but that’s not a crime now. When these married teachers have sex with teen boys, they are not charged with adultery. The boy is not charged with anything, and is instead portrayed as a “victim.”

It’s obviously distasteful for a teacher to have sex with a student, but it’s going to happen as long as there are female teachers looking over male students. Regardless, sex should be a private matter. If the teachers get caught by the school faculty, they should be fired and that should be the end of it. The government has no role here.

What you have is a creeping program to outlaw heterosexual behavior. All of this stuff around consent theory is a creeping thing, just like gun control. When you hear about a plan to ban bump stocks or Glock switches, you are immediately against it, because you understand that even while these items might not be particularly important to you, they are part of a program to chip away at gun rights. It’s the same thing with these prosecutions of seemingly distasteful heterosexual sexual matters: they are chipping away at the legality of heterosexual behavior.

Every white man is on edge around women at this point. There are virtually no opportunities for initiating mating, other than using apps, which is only about one night stands and is just a way for the most attractive men to have sex with all of the women. Normal sex behavior has broken down completely, and this puritanism regarding heterosexual behavior simply does not jive with the extremist liberalism with regards to homosexual behavior. It also does not jive with Pakistanis in the UK being allowed to pick up 13-year-old girls outside the school and turn them into junkie-hookers.

All of these things put together cannot be a coincidence. We are witnessing a direct assault on heterosexuality.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been accused of s*xual abuse by a former family nanny.

The alleged incident occurred in 1999, when the woman, Eliza Cooney, then in her 20s, says a 45-year-old Kennedy stood behind her in the kitchen of his Mount Kisco, New York, home and groped her… pic.twitter.com/Jm5cp4sLOd

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) July 5, 2024

🚨BREAKING: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sent a BOMBSHELL midnight text message apology to the nanny who accused him of groping her.

Kennedy sent it on July 4th at 12:33am, just 2 days after the accusation was made public, according to a report from the Washington Post.

He even… pic.twitter.com/sVjxDOHxTV

— Really American 🇺🇸 (@ReallyAmerican1) July 12, 2024

Previously: RFK Jr. Shrugs Off Babysitter Groping Accusations, Basically Admits It, Says He’s Done Way Worse Shit

RFK didn’t even rape this babysitter. He didn’t even jack-off in front of her or anything.

Personally, if my kids had a hot babysitter, I would make 50 Shades of Gray look like Winnie the Pooh.

No, no, I joke. I wouldn’t do BDSM on the babysitter. I would rape her for years though.

All RFK did was ask the slut to oil his back.

A nigga’s back needs oiled, bitch.

Sorry.

Reuters:

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr has apologized to a former family babysitter who accused him of sexual assault, the woman told Reuters on Friday.

The woman, Eliza Cooney, told Vanity Fair in an article earlier this month that Kennedy groped her in the family kitchen when she was employed as a part-time babysitter in the late 1990s by Kennedy and his then-wife Mary Richardson.

…

“I read your description of an episode in which I touched you in an unwanted manner,” Kennedy said in a text message sent to Cooney that was seen by Reuters. Reuters verified it was Kennedy’s cellphone number using TLOxp, a service that provides public and proprietary data.

“I have no memory of this incident,” the text continues, “but I apologize sincerely for anything I ever did that made you feel uncomfortable or anything I did or said that offended you or hurt your feelings.”

“If I hurt you, it was inadvertent. I feel badly for doing so.”

This is sort of hilarious.

It’s much less gay than a public apology.

Personally, I would have accused the bitch of trying to have sex with me, and said “I’m a married man, and this slut is trying to oil me up!”

If the Democratic Party calls…sure, I’ll answer 🤙🏼 pic.twitter.com/akynVcOrOO

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) July 12, 2024

🇫🇷🏉 Two French #rugby players have been accused of multiple counts of rape and of beating a woman following a game in #Argentina.

Oscar Jegou and Hugo Auradou were transferred to the city of Mendoza where the crimes allegedly took place.

⚠️ Some details may be distressing ️ pic.twitter.com/GVmnGfadGo

— FRANCE 24 English (@France24_en) July 12, 2024

There are 12-year-old boys on the gay sex app Grindr. No one does anything about it. You would actually probably get investigated by the FBI for complaining about it.

But all heterosexual sex is now illegal. Literally, any time you have sex with a woman, you can be charged with some kind of crime. There is no way, in a Western country, to have sex with a woman and be 100% sure you won’t be charged with a crime.

This includes sex with your wife. She can charge you with a crime.

Then these people come at you like “oh, sorry to tell you, but you’re not breeding, so we have to replace your entire population with niggers.”

The Guardian:

Prosecutors in Argentina have charged two French rugby players with aggravated rape, in the grisly case of a woman who said she was repeatedly assaulted by the athletes after they took her back to their hotel room and prevented her from leaving.

Did they kidnap her?

What does “took her back to their hotel room” mean?

Did they use duct tape?

The prosecutor’s office in the western city of Mendoza – where the alleged assault took place last Sunday following the French team’s test match against the Argentinian Pumas – ordered the two players, Oscar Jegou and Hugo Auradou, to remain in detention until trial.

Hugo Auradou

Oscar Jegou

After being arrested in Buenos Aires, Jegou, 21, and Auradou, 20, were transferred 1,000km (620 miles) to Mendoza on Thursday for their first court appearance. They chose not to testify in Friday’s hearing.

The French Rugby Federation had previously said that the players admitted to having consensual sex with the alleged victim and denied any acts of violence.

…

The woman says that after meeting the players at a nightclub, she was taken to their hotel room and subjected to violent, non-consensual sexual acts and prevented from leaving. After escaping the hotel room, Romano said the victim filed a police complaint and underwent physical examinations.

This is just so goofy.

And it never stops.

It just keeps getting goofier.

Listen, slut: if you don’t want to have sex, don’t go to the hotel room of aggressive men. In fact, slut: don’t go to the club at all. If you are drunk at a club and decide to go to a hotel room to get fucked by sports players, that is your decision.

If you don’t like that decision you made, make different decisions.

XV de France RUGBY [Thread] | The 2 French rugby players in a bar drinking alcohol the evening of the meeting with the victim.#France #Rugby #XVdeFrance #HugoAuradou #OscarJegou pic.twitter.com/lE8yu4YzTr

— STESS News (@stessnews) July 12, 2024

So this is like, a real crime now.

There’s no victim and there is no law.

But they’ll just put you in jail now because a woman cried about some whining abut her stupid child feelings.

The Guardian:

A court in south-west Spain has sentenced 15 schoolchildren to a year’s probation for creating and spreading AI-generated images of their female peers in a case that prompted a debate on the harmful and abusive uses of deepfake technology.

Police began investigating the matter last year after parents in the Extremaduran town of Almendralejo reported that faked naked pictures of their daughters were being circulated on WhatsApp groups.

The mother of one of the victims said the dissemination of the pictures on WhatsApp had been going on since July.

“Many girls were completely terrified and had tremendous anxiety attacks because they were suffering this in silence,” she told Reuters at the time. “They felt bad and were afraid to tell and be blamed for it.”

On Tuesday, a youth court in the city of Badajoz said it had convicted the minors of 20 counts of creating child abuse images and 20 counts of offences against their victims’ moral integrity.

Each of the defendants was handed a year’s probation and ordered to attend classes on gender and equality awareness, and on the “responsible use of technology”.

…

Police identified several teenagers aged between 13 and 15 as being responsible for generating and sharing the images.

They’re not “child abuse images” if they’re fake images.

This is a fake law.

It’s chud abuse.

Teens are sending deepfake nude images of classmates to each other, disrupting lives. Schools, technology developers and parents need to act now | Opinion https://t.co/bqDBtrkjDa

— Scientific American (@sciam) June 10, 2024

So this is like, a real crime now.

There’s no victim and there is no law.

But they’ll just put you in jail now because a woman cried about someone hurting her stupid childish feelings.

The Guardian:

A court in south-west Spain has sentenced 15 schoolchildren to a year’s probation for creating and spreading AI-generated images of their female peers in a case that prompted a debate on the harmful and abusive uses of deepfake technology.

Police began investigating the matter last year after parents in the Extremaduran town of Almendralejo reported that faked naked pictures of their daughters were being circulated on WhatsApp groups.

The mother of one of the victims said the dissemination of the pictures on WhatsApp had been going on since July.

“Many girls were completely terrified and had tremendous anxiety attacks because they were suffering this in silence,” she told Reuters at the time. “They felt bad and were afraid to tell and be blamed for it.”

On Tuesday, a youth court in the city of Badajoz said it had convicted the minors of 20 counts of creating child abuse images and 20 counts of offences against their victims’ moral integrity.

Each of the defendants was handed a year’s probation and ordered to attend classes on gender and equality awareness, and on the “responsible use of technology”.

…

Police identified several teenagers aged between 13 and 15 as being responsible for generating and sharing the images.

They’re not “child abuse images” if they’re fake images.

This is a fake law.

It’s chud abuse.

Teens are sending deepfake nude images of classmates to each other, disrupting lives. Schools, technology developers and parents need to act now | Opinion https://t.co/bqDBtrkjDa

— Scientific American (@sciam) June 10, 2024

These laws are being made by people who know what heterosexual sex is, presumably.

I know many readers are proud incels, so I guess it’s necessary to explain.

Firstly, in order to have sex with a woman, she has to be alone with you, voluntarily, in a private place. Unless you kidnapped her, she is there voluntarily. Alone with you. In a private place.

When you are trying to have sex with the woman, she will often say “no,” while giggling. She will playfully act as if she’s trying to prevent you from removing her clothes, while you playfully remove them.

In many such situations, “no” will be the last word you hear before she starts moaning.

I’m not endorsing fornication. But this is traditionally how it occurs. Both parties are aware that this is a kind of mating ritual.

If she actually does not want it, the man will probably notice and stop. But if he’s drunk or just not getting it, she can scream. She can bite him. She can scratch him.

An actual “rape” as we used to think of it is an act of violence. It is an assault. You have to either hold down a screaming woman, and probably punch her or use a gun or knife to intimidate her.

I’m of the opinion personally that if a woman enters a private place with a man voluntarily, “rape” is impossible. At the very least there has to be proof of some kind of violence. If it happens, the woman needs to go to the police as soon as she escapes the man, and the police can see if she has been physically damaged.

In most countries, historically, even if a woman had scratches or something, if she said “I was in that man’s room and then he raped me” the police would say “how did you get in his room? Did he kidnap you?” and if the answer was “no, I went to his room alone with him to have a drink,” the police would laugh and tell her to leave the police station.

Note: If the man gets her in a room alone and then beats her up or threatens her with a gun or something, that is obviously a separate matter, but those are different crimes than rape.

“Positive consent” criminalizes heterosexual sex.

Notes from Poland:

A large majority in the Sejm, the more powerful lower hour of parliament, has approved a change to Poland’s rape law that would make it a crime to engage in sexual intercourse without the consent of the other person.

The current law – which dates back to 1932 – defines rape as an act that “subjects another person to sexual intercourse by force, unlawful threats or deception”. It does not specify lack of consent as a criterion.

That has resulted in rulings such as one in 2020 in which a man was acquitted of raping a 14-year-old girl because the judge accepted his argument that the fact she did not scream during the act meant that the perpetrator did not use violence.

Today, 335 members of the 460-seat Sejm voted in favour of a proposal by The Left (Lewica), one of the groups that make up Poland’s ruling coalition, to define sexual intercourse with “a lack of conscious and voluntary consent” as rape.

Most of those votes came from the ruling coalition, whose members range from the left to the centre-right. The only major party to vote entirely against the measure was the far-right Confederation (Konfederacja).

The national-conservative Law and Justice (PiS), which constitutes the main opposition group, was divided: 94 of its MPs voted in favour of changing the law, 26 were opposed while 47 abstained and 22 did not participate in the vote.

During a debate on the bill yesterday, some MPs from Confederation and PiS argued that it would deprive men of the presumption of innocence and could be used by women to falsely accuse men of rape.

“The new law is pure demagogy and de facto a gift for ruthless and vindictive women who will now be able to use this law to attack their former lovers,” said PiS MP Grzegorz Lorek, quoted by broadcaster TVN.

“This bill introduces a de facto presumption of guilt, a presumption of guilt that every person accused of rape will have to prove that he or she is not a criminal,” added Witold Tumanowicz of Confederation.

However, another PiS MP, Agnieszka Wojciechowska van Heukelom, declared that she supported the bill because “a woman’s will, a woman’s awareness when engaging in a sexual act is very important, so I am absolutely on the side of women”.

So…

That’s insane.

And let me say, in terms of the whole fornication issue: it is best to get married before sex. That is ideal. However, a lot of marriages, since the beginning of time, happened after the first sexual encounter.

It’s not actually wholesome, but it seems wholesome now: a woman has sex with a man then goes and tells her dad then the dad goes to the man and says “you know what this means right, bro?” And the man is like “aw, shucks.” Then they get married.

But even if it is just base fornication – how is that the business of the government? And like, virtually everyone that is having sex (not many) is doing fornication, because of feminism. It’s lunacy, to outlaw normal sex in this manner.

Especially in a country with a collapsing birthrate.

Maybe there are some other problems in Poland that the government might want to look into before diving into consent theory?

Snake Baker contributed to this article. 

]]> https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/05/17/old-women-say-david-copperfield-committed-sexual-misconduct-more-than-30-years-ago/ Fri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000

David Copperfield with contestants from the 1991 Look of the Year event in New York City.

This Guardian article is super-long.

Here’s the tl;dr of the allegations:

• He called a 15-year-old woman and asked her what she was wearing.
• He grabbed a 15-year-old woman around the waist while posing for photos during a boat party.
• He spoke to the mother of one of the teens and came off as “creepy.”
• Someone saw him flirting with a teenage girl.
• Variations of the above.
• He took a 17-year-old woman to a bar, drugged her and did something she can’t remember because she blacked out.

The Guardian:

It was September 1991 in New York and the grand finale of Look of the Year, a prestigious modeling contest that had helped launch the careers of supermodels Cindy Crawford and Helena Christensen.

The celebrity magician David Copperfield, one of the judges, watched from the front row as 58 contestants paraded across the runway in their branded hot pink and sorbet yellow swimsuits. Nearly all the contestants were teenagers; some were as young as 14.

Today, more than three decades later, five former contestants say that they were subjected to behavior by Copperfield that they now regard as inappropriate or worse. The women – who were all teenagers at the time – met him at the New York contest in 1991 or three years earlier in Japan, when he was also a judge. Others who attended the events also say they witnessed Copperfield behaving inappropriately towards the girls.

Unfortunately for women, 14 is peak sexual attractiveness for women.

Fortunately for men, 50 is peak sexual attractiveness for men.

The claims include allegations of unwanted sexual touching and sexual harassment. In one case, a former contestant alleges she was drugged and sexually assaulted by Copperfield in the months after the competition. She was 17 years old at the time, she says.

The claims follow a report in yesterday’s Guardian US, which detailed allegations of sexual misconduct and inappropriate behavior by Copperfield from women who had met him in connection with his performances. There was also an allegation of drugging in that story: one woman told the Guardian that she believes she and a friend were drugged by Copperfield before he had sexual relations with them, leaving them unable to consent.

In written responses to questions from the Guardian, lawyers for David Copperfield denied all the allegations of misconduct and inappropriate behavior. Copperfield’s lawyers said he has “never, ever acted inappropriately with anyone, let alone anyone underage”.

I’m not even a big fan of David Copperfield. In fact, I’m not a fan at all.

I think Brittany Spears was a better Vegas act.

But come on.

He’s not accused of rape.

He’s accused of flirting. These metoo allegations are just getting dumber as they run out of better allegations.

What Weinstein’s lawyer actually means is, this is a great day for misogynists who believe women lie about rape, and a very dark day for survivors and the justice system. pic.twitter.com/E778ZURXrh

— Dr Charlotte Proudman (@DrProudman) April 25, 2024

See: Consent Theory on Steroids: Harvey Weinstein Sentenced to TWENTY-THREE YEARS IN PRISON

Well, we didn’t expect this.

Apparently, the Harvey Weinstein conviction, based exclusively on one of his girlfriends claiming that at some point in their relationship, they had sex when she didn’t really feel like it. (She had sex with him both before and after the alleged events, but one time, it wasn’t “consensual.”)

This is a massive win for all men.

No one likes Harvey Weinstein, but he didn’t “rape” anyone, and what this ruling did was make it so all forms of normal heterosexual sex could be relabeled “rape,” and men could face decades in prison based on a completely fake crime for which there was no evidence.

Reuters:

Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 conviction for sexual assault and rape was overturned by New York’s highest court, reopening the landmark case that fueled the #MeToo movement and highlighting the challenges of holding powerful men accountable.

Many accusers of the former Hollywood movie mogul condemned Thursday’s decision, with the actress Ashley Judd telling reporters it was “an act of institutional betrayal.”

You’re plastic surgery is an act of institutional betrayal, Ashley.

You had sex with Harvey to promote your career, because you are a prostitute. Harvey fulfilled his end of the bargain, and made you a star. Adults make decisions and they live with them.

Shut your deformed whore mouth.

The office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg signaled it planned to retry Weinstein.

In a bitterly divided 4-3 ruling, the state Court of Appeals said the trial judge made a critical mistake by letting women testify that Weinstein assaulted them, even though their accusations were not part of the charges he faced.

The appeals court said the trial judge compounded the error by ruling that if Weinstein took the witness stand, prosecutors could question him on a wide range of “loathsome” conduct, including bullying and fits of anger toward associates.

It said the ruling had an impact on Weinstein’s decision not to testify in his own defense, undermining a fact-finding process that turned on the parties’ credibility.

“The remedy for these egregious errors is a new trial,” Judge Jenny Rivera wrote for the majority.

Are you even allowed to do that?

Weinstein, 72, has been serving a 23-year sentence in a prison in upstate Rome, New York.

Jurors in Manhattan convicted him in February 2020 of sexually assaulting former production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006, and raping aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013.

Miriam Haley

Jessica Mann

The conviction included charges of first-degree sexual assault and third-degree rape. Weinstein was acquitted on other charges.

At a press conference, Weinstein’s lawyer Arthur Aidala called the decision “a great day for America.”

True.

Aidala said Weinstein expressed relief when they spoke about the decision, which Weinstein learned about when someone at the prison handed him a piece of paper announcing the outcome.

“He just said thank you more times than I can count,” Aidala said. “He’s in a horrible place, a horrible situation, but the human spirit is strong and he’s done the best he can.”

Weinstein is not expected to be freed immediately, as he faces a separate 16-year prison term imposed last year in California after he was convicted for the 2013 rape of an actress at a Los Angeles hotel. That conviction still stands.

Yeah, that was also fake.

Just let him out.

Then put him on trial for making “Good Will Hunting” and polluting the soul of America.

NOW: Harvey Weinstein’s legal team holds a press conference after his 2020 rape conviction was overturned by the New York Court of Appeals earlier today

An anti-Trump protester, after learning the press conference was about Weinstein, held up a sign reading “is a pig” pic.twitter.com/rOh8OdrFom

— katie smith (@probablyreadit) April 25, 2024