“Learn to code” is much less viable as a career choice if billions of Indians know how to code and are willing to do it for significantly less than the basic costs of living in Western countries.

American companies moving software jobs to India like they’ve moved manufacturing to China would be a particularly nightmarish scenario.

FOSSBYTES:

As per the new education policy approved by the Narendra Modi-led government, students in India will be taught coding as a subject from as early as class 6. Typically, students in the 6th standard are roughly around 10-11 yrs of age. The aim of teaching programming skills in schools is to help them acquire 21st-century skills.

This announcement was made in by Education Ministry officials at a press conference in the presence of Union Minister Prakash Javadekar.

The world is advancing highly in technology, and several job roles today requires coding skills in candidates. So keeping the future in mind, programming skills can ensure a greater exposure to technical knowledge in early stages and help students progress easily if they wish to take up a technical career ahead.

As long as H1-B visas are a thing, Americans doing software development are directly threatened by Indians. Companies often hire these people to work remotely, too. With remote work being the default in America now due to the coronavirus hoax, a lot of companies are going to start crunching the numbers and realize that there isn’t any significant difference in hiring someone who lives down the road and someone who lives on the other side of the planet.

Indians are cheaper than automation, robots and AI, and they feel entitled to America’s wealth.

Today protests broke out outside @SenGaryPeters’s office protesting @SenatorDurbin’s bigotry against Indian immigrants.

Durbin needs to be constructive by negotiating with Senator Lee, instead of shamelessly grandstanding on the Senate floor.

Sen Peters needs to denounce Durbin pic.twitter.com/m0Jl0cWCMs

— Immigration Voice (@immivoice) July 23, 2020

There’s more than a billion Indians over there, dreaming the American dream.

They’re coming.

There was an annual PHP conference in Europe called PHP Central Europe Conference (PHP.CE). This year’s event was scheduled to take place in October in Dresden, Germany, but has now been canceled.

In fact, the whole thing is just canceled forever, because Karl L Hughes, a random pervert from Chicago who wasn’t attending the conference, decided to point out that it was all white men in current year.

This year's @phpce_eu conference seems to have gone with the "White Males Only" conference lineup 😬

Shame. It's 2019, we can do better.

— Karl L Hughes (@KarlLHughes) July 17, 2019

After the tweet, speakers started pulling out for fear of being associated with a white supremacist agenda, then ticket sales dropped, so the organizers just canceled the entire event.

In the post announcing the cancelation of the event, the organizers cited the tweet from Hughes as well as two of the speakers who pulled out as a result of the social justice agenda.

One of those speakers was Larry Garfield, who is Jewish and pulled out because he didn’t want to be associated with Nazism.

Skipping @phpce_eu this year — Steemit https://t.co/8RwQe4zOy8 #PHP

— Larry Garfield (@Crell) July 20, 2019

Garfield himself was recently ousted from Drupal for being involved in BDSM (effectively anti-Semitism).

The other was Mark Baker.

Sadly, I've chosen to withdraw as a speaker from @phpce_eu PHPCE 2019. This blog post provides
a short explanation of my reasons – https://t.co/xFcsimp6hU

— Mark Baker 🇪🇺 (@Mark_Baker) July 24, 2019

Baker claimed he “cannot accept the situation” of only white males speaking at a programming conference in former communist bloc Europe.

Hughes is now out there grandstanding, saying that everyone at a tech conference needs to be the same as the people who use the technology.

The comments on my Twitter thread are pretty out of control, but there are good ones in there 👏 https://t.co/pUMTDZwIHr

— Karl L Hughes (@KarlLHughes) August 27, 2019

The organizers said that they just didn’t even get any submissions from people who are not white males. They did have that Jew. But apparently he wasn’t diverse enough.

Great News

This situation is highly exploitable.

If we’re really already at the point where you simply cannot have an all white male event even in the whitest field in one of the whitest areas of the world, then basically we are in free-for-all territory. We can all now start demanding that everyone who runs everything be a tranny.

This is the reverse of the anti-white snitching that is going on.

Seriously – start doing this:

Look for anything, anywhere that you do not like and start accusing them of being white supremacists for not having enough diversity. Even if they have blacks and women and whatever else, you can start talking about trannys. They almost certainly do not have trannys because there are so few of these people, but it obviously does not matter. They will just have to find a tranny or be shut down.

There were obviously no black or woman PHP coders who wanted to speak at this conference. So the implication is that they have to go out and find the diversity themselves. Well, make everyone find trannys or get shut down.

Then once they start including trannys, start demanding black trannys – “I’m happy to see that [X thing you hate] is finally embracing the trans community, however I was shocked to see that there is no one from the black trans community being represented. It’s [current year] and we can do better.”

Then you can start demanding crippled black trannys, trannys with Down syndrome, and just on and on and on. There is no ceiling on this, until everything in the world is exclusively involving negro trannys with Down syndrome in wheelchairs.

This entire system can be completely jammed by forcing it to uphold its own standards if people so choose. And trannys really are the weak spot, because they are promoting them so aggressively now but there are so few of them and the ones that exist are completely insane and most of them are convicted child molesters.

These tubes are not your friend.

Is it any wonder YouTube’s staff is “accidentally” disabling even moderate right-wing accounts, if they have hardcore anti-White hiring policies?

It looks like it’s damn near impossible to get through that front door unless you’re some kind of negro carpet-munching bulldyke.

Pretty much every HR department in major corporations will have similar hiring practices, but typically tech companies will let in a few Asian and White men to actually do the work. Increasingly, it seems like Google is trying to find some new method of operating a technology business without any actual skilled engineers.

I got that feeling initially when hearing about how Google was designing its own language, Golang, with a stated purpose of being “easier” to work with, especially in large teams of “entry-level” programmers. In other words, they’re developing new technologies to allow swarms of retard-tier Indians to do the work of White engineers.

Primary benefit: high IQ and discipline not required. Also: grammar mistake in the opening slide of this presentation, smdh. Yes, an Indian is responsible.

So stories like this aren’t especially surprising.

Fast Company:

YouTube will likely incur the wrath of people who think diversity is a four-letter word in the wake of a lawsuit that accuses the streaming giant of limiting its hiring of white and Asian men as a way to ensure more diversity.

The Wall Street Journal writes that Google-owned YouTube is being sued by former employee (and white male) Arne Wilberg because of its diversity-oriented hiring practices. “Last spring, YouTube recruiters were allegedly instructed to cancel interviews with applicants who weren’t female, black or Hispanic,” the Journal reports, “and to ‘purge entirely’ the applications of people who didn’t fit those categories.”

tfw it’s time to “purge entirely” White males.

Google strongly rejected the charge while also defending its attempts to build a diverse workforce. “We have a clear policy to hire candidates based on their merit, not their identity,” a Google spokesperson told the Journal in a statement. “At the same time, we unapologetically try to find a diverse pool of qualified candidates for open roles, as this helps us hire the best people, improve our culture, and build better products.”

In other words, “we’re definitely not guilty of whatever this lawsuit alleges, but we totally believe in discriminating against White males.”

Scumbag Google strikes again.

In his suit, Wilberg claims he was fired for retaliation because of complaints that he was being discriminated against because of his race and gender. This despite the countless white males who work for the tech giant. The legal action comes amid claims made by former Google employee James Damore that he was fired for penning an anti-diversity memo that stirred up a firestorm of controversy.

“The countless White males who work for the tech giant.”

Really? Hmmmm….

Somehow, I’m not so sure about that.

Frankly, I think this whole mess is a combination of two factors. On one hand, the Google administration wants to reduce their dependency on a few highly compentent White and (to a lesser extent) Asian males, and instead have a more manageable army of low skilled laborers. On the other, the company’s staff has been taken over by insane SJW activists who couldn’t care less about Google’s bottom line, and the higher ups are afraid to go against them. This was suggested by some tech experts during the Damore fiasco.

It’s really a wonder that the company can even operate at this rate. But judging by the state of YouTube, things might be at the point where they start to deteriorate quickly from here on out.

While it is tempting to brush off the more ridiculous manifestations of postmodern thought by mocking their unintentional hilarity, occasionally a more serious takedown of the ideas is warranted. In my last article I mocked the idea of so-called Feminist Programming Languages by pointing out how stupid and unworkable it is to try to create a supposedly “new” kind of programming language out of a hodgepodge of abstract nonsense, deliberate contradictions and politically correct bullshit. I offered my opinion that Arielle Schlesinger, the woman behind the project, is nothing but a hack that knows how to repeat technical sounding jargon, but has no actual understanding of computers.

That was all well and good, but I failed to address the more fundamental point that Feminist Programming is not supposed to work in the first place. There is no point to actually trying to make it work. The whole thing is a huge lie and a massive boondoggle.

The most important thing to understand about postmodern feminist philosophy is that it is political rent-seeking behavior. The purpose of this school of thought is not to discover some kind of truth or to come to a better understanding of reality, but to come up with rhetorical techniques and mechanisms that allow feminist activists to perpetually frame and re-frame the terms of discourse to their advantage. Usually the strategy is to gain the moral high ground by constantly uncovering novel forms of oppression and discrimination in every aspect of society. This is why feminists support premises like paraconsistent logic and standpoint theory. These systems are fluid and can be easily adapted to changing social circumstances. The rhetoric is deliberately designed to confuse people, obfuscate reality, conflate categories and poison the well. The end goal is to use social shaming to gain security, resources and power from men or male dominated institutions that they are incapable of competing with or participating in.

This is why we have Feminist Programming Languages. This is why we have developer evangelists. This is how people like Adria Richards and Arielle Schlesinger get jobs. This is how think-tanks like HASTAC get founded and funded. The computer programming field has come under particular scrutiny from feminists recently because it is the most active sector of the economy. It gets a lot of media attention and the people involved in the production and design of tech products are overwhelmingly white and male. That is a huge, juicy pile of resources that is just too tempting to pass up.

Trigger Warning: Adria Richards.

A revealing comment by user “Cathy Davidson” on the HASTAC website further illustrates this point:

“I give a lot of talks now at corporations dedicated to technology innovation and, within fifteen minutes, I always hear that the single biggest problem in that world is lack of diversity. CEOs and CIOs don’t see it as a problem for women but a problem for technology: you cannot create technology for a very diverse world (in every sense) with a homogeneous core of developers and managers. They find it to be a major problem and are funding ways of changing the problem to the tune of billions of dollars a year worldwide. No one knows what to do but no one in that world is sanguine about the fact that the number of women entering the field of computer science has declined since 1993 when the Mosaic 1.0 browser was released to the general public and the “Information Age” officially began.

That’s a problem. So is the 9%-14% (the numbers vary depending on what and who you count) representation of women among editors of Wikipedia. We have a major cultural, social, political, and economic issue here and everyone in the tech world is aware of it.

Please put the parodies aside, folks. This is a real, serious issue. Getting to the root problem is essential in real, practical terms as well as in theoretical terms. Ari Schlesinger is performing a real service to the profession by provoking serious conversation on these matters.”

So here we see it all laid out really. Feminist programming is facilitating a conversation, which is all it really needs to do. Being stupid enough to get neckbeards to make fun of it may even be a plus here. Big corporations are looking at ways of funding a solution to the supposed diversity problem in technology. What sorts of programs do you think are going to be getting a big chunk of that money? It will be speakers like Cathy Davidson and “researchers” like Arielle Schlesinger. These women don’t actually want to work in the tech sector and we know this because they did not choose to study technology despite zero structural barriers preventing them from doing so. They want sinecures that provide resources, security and prestige but don’t actually require thought, hard work or concrete results.

If any CEOs are actually complaining to Cathy that they have a diversity problem, they are saying it to temporarily appease her as they fulfill their federally mandated “diversity in technology” training seminar. No doubt they forget about it as soon as they go back to their desk to do real work and Cathy takes her pants suit and Powerpoint presentation to her next corporate speaking gig. No one in the tech sector right now gives a shit about diversity. There is no reason whatsoever why a lack of diversity in the field would be a problem unless it comes from government quotas and legal threats. The fact that most programmers are White or Asian is not a problem for the field in and of itself. An attempt to artificially shake up the demographics of the industry probably would lead to real problems with social cohesion and productivity, but that’s not really the point here. The feminists are already getting what they want.