I shouldn’t publish headlines like that. I’m in no way suicidal. And I don’t want to be “suicided.”

Although I will say. This might be too doxy, but I’ll say it because I just asked the robot and this could have happened in any number of places: I got stung by a scorpion last week. And I asked people: “Are these deadly?” The answer, unanimously, was “probably not but it’s possible.” And my answer was “yeah, okay. It doesn’t really matter.”

People tell me not to write about myself but I don’t know what else to write about because all of this other stuff seems so totally meaningless. NB4, “oh, so you’re the only thing that matters???” No, retard, but I’m not going to write about my friends and family. And in general, that is the only thing I think matters. Not me personally, but my personal life. And yours. Everyone’s. Unless it is someone I hate, in which case they don’t matter and I hope they die.

In general, there has been a personal and professional reckoning, where I have concluded that politics are completely without meaning. In short, “meaning” as a concept can only be personal, and personal meaning can exist or not under any political system. The danger we face now of course is an existential danger to humanity itself, where there exists a threat to completely erase humanity as a concept, replacing humans with cyborgs or whatever. Generally, this seems unlikely to actually occur. But it is a thing that people are finally talking about. I’ve been talking about it since before the Daily Stormer existed, before I was ever a “neo-Nazi white supremacist” or whatever stupid meme. I read and watched what these people were saying about transforming into a “post-human” form, and it just seemed obvious that this would be the goal of anyone with money. What else would they do with money, when they do not believe in God and the dream of eternal life is within reach?

Unlike myself, the sort who gets stung by a scorpion and says “yeah it doesn’t really make much difference if it kills me, I’m cool either way,” most people are very attached to life.

Nick Fuentes is out of the media now. People I know who don’t really even care that much about politics were contacting me like, “yo, what’s going on, why are they astroturfing this guy like this, what are they trying to do?” and I was like “um, this is, um, eh, it’s just, you know, kind of a boring story, really.” But the thing got too weird and so the media eventually dropped it. It’s possible he’s gone forever now, at least gone from that level of exposure, because he was just so unprepared to play that role. Being very quick on your feet when talking does not mean you’re able to formulate ideas, and telling him to go out and say everyone is a Russian agent and the FBI is totally telling the truth about Charlie Kirk, without giving it a definite script, turned out to be a complete disaster and basically everyone was disgusted by the whole charade. It’s possible that they will still use him as this kind of official opposition figure, I don’t know. They’re unlikely to find anyone more stable. One of their other guys recently released tapes of him having sex with men from Grindr. (I’m not going to tell that story, I’m sure anyone can look it up. Basically, an FBI antisemite guy released gay sex tapes because I guess he was being blackmailed. He also smokes meth, so maybe he just thought he was being blackmailed.)

But they’re not going to get me. Even all the people who hate me know I be like:

If you find yourself in a situation where antisemitism has become so mainstream that you need a controlled opposition antisemite to be plastered everywhere, Fuentes is the best you’re going to do. I would argue that the mistake was putting him on the Charlie Kirk case. It’s confusing what exactly they were even thinking. It could have been a pressure test, to see how capable he was of forwarding an extremely unpopular narrative, to see how moldable his followers were. But again, they don’t have some list of people lining up to take his place. The fact that you’re going to put yourself in the “public antisemite” space basically means you are insane, either driven by pure antisocial desires or some terrible sense of justice. If it is the former, it’s only a matter of time before you end up burning yourself. Virtually all of these people that I’ve seen have ended up in some kind of homosexual scandal. For Matt Heimbach, it was a sex scandal with his mother-in-law. Kudos to him for keeping it hetero. I guess.

The Fuentes debacle was extremely disheartening. I had known he was working with the feds for some years now, but to see the card played like that was obscene. It should have been heartening that no amount of force was enough to get anyone to take it seriously. I guess.

Whatever. I do feel like most of what I did was a waste. I put so much time and effort into Fuentes. People who know know, I’m not interested in explaining it to people who don’t know. Getting stabbed in the back because he’s a pussy who can’t do a bit of time and a queen who cares about money (for reasons other than “because women like money”) was whatever. It was more just a forced reckoning with how hopeless things actually are.

The good part is, I realized that what I do feel meant something was the extent to which I was able to help boys and young men (or older men, in some situations), and the fact I was able to bring some laughter into people’s lives. So with that understanding, an understanding of what I did that actually meant something (or that I believe meant something – it’s the same thing), I can move forward.

I am working on the TV show. I’m a little bit worried about money. I’ve burned through a lot of money keeping the site online over the last year, while people rightfully weren’t really donating because I wasn’t really posting. I’m concerned that the money won’t really be there for the show. But we’ll see.

Anyway, the main point here was just to confirm I’m not dead.

I am pushing ahead with the TV show. At least then if I do finally have some kind of total psychological breakdown, it will be on the public record, you know?

Looking at my life, it is incredible what I’ve been able to hold together. I think I’ve probably made it past the point where I would fall apart. But if I do, I see no better place to do it than on an internet TV show. At least I can confirm it won’t be anything gay or otherwise deeply sick. It would just be the exhausted collapse of a man ridiculous enough to have imagined that he could do something good.

Wait, no. That’s too heavy, self-congratulatory, masturbatory.

Let me try again.

It would just be the retarded end of a retard.

That fits better.

But yes. I am going to clean myself up. And I’m going to do a TV show. This will occur. Of the things I did that I think may have mattered, it is going to focus on the humor part, rather than the helping young men part. It’s going to be primarily an artistic project, rather than a political one. I really like a lot of stuff that is happening with AI, and I see a way to use it in an interesting way. I will try to make it pay for itself. If it doesn’t, then I’ll just say that it wasn’t meant to be.

The target launch date is probably still about the same: late first, early second quarter.

In terms of those essays I was supposed to publish two weeks ago… I have them. They’re really done. I just haven’t been able to bring myself to care enough to give them a final pass and publish them. But yes, to the extent that I am interested in politics at all at this point, I am interested in the psy-op that is the “alternative media” landscape, and as this will be the topic of my TV show, it makes sense to publish some preliminary written works on the topic.

The Real Issue: My Conversion to Communism

I guess it’s probably more important to explain my conversion to communism.

Of course, I haven’t actually converted to communism. Communism is an ideology. Bertrand Russell actually very casually classified it as a religion. I am against all ideologies. Furthermore, I am a religious Christian, and communism, as an ideology (or a religion) is anti-Christian, even though it does tend to uphold all of the social norms of Christianity (the major exception being abortion; I’m sure there are other exceptions, though none major I can think of).

Ideology is an insane replacement of philosophy. I suppose that what I would say specifically is that my understanding of Christian philosophy has caused me to align more with economic policies supported by socialists, as I have come to realize that it is simply an absolute fact that money corrupts everything it touches. The top leaders in the Gulf States are drinking alcohol, engaged casually in homosexuality, and so on. The new leader in Syria, whatever he’s calling himself now, certainly changed his tune when the option for wealth appeared to him.

It seems like this pretty much always happens. Maybe it didn’t used to happen, before the Industrial Revolution, when the power that wealth gave you was always limited, but now that the power that wealth brings is unlimited, it seems that there is no one too pure to not get sucked into it, which simply means that those with the gold make the rules. And frankly, the Jews control the wealth, due to their control of the banks, and this means they can control everyone.

I hate to say it, but if I hadn’t been forced into exile, it’s probable I would have been myself corrupted. Why wouldn’t I have been? I mean I like to think I wouldn’t have been, because I like to think I am who I believe I am, but everyone believes all sorts of things about themselves, and most of the time these things are not true, so it would seem ridiculous for me to believe that I am the singular exception.

I suppose my exile allows me to believe that I am the exception. So I might as well just take the win. Regardless, even if I and some small percentage of people are willing to stand on moral principle, due to insanity or a fear of God (most likely a mix of both), and perhaps some desire for legacy, the majority are not, and so you can only trust people who are locked into an incentive structure.

Presidents Putin and Xi are good men. They behave as very good men, using their power as leaders to work for the benefit of their people. It is worthy of note however that the incentive structures they operate within are such as they benefit personally from behaving in a way that benefits their people. This is in stark contrast to the incentive system in democracies, where any individual working in the system maximizes personal benefit by acting against the interests of the population, and in the interests of donors.

It is probably true that authoritarian governments attract people who are more driven by principle, whereas democracy governments attract people with no morals at all, along with many actual sadistic sociopaths. I would be shocked to find out that Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping do not behave in their personal lives, when no one is watching, much better than Joe Biden or Donald Trump. And people like Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz are obviously deeply sick. Then you’ve got women running around trying to get everyone killed for sexual reasons. Everything. The question of the extent to which authoritarianism shapes men into better men and the extent to which it attracts better men is ultimately irrelevant, as it is obvious that better men run authoritarian governments. If I had to guess, I would say that at the highest levels, it is genuinely good (authoritarianism) or bad (democracy) people who seek power, while at middle and lower, people are mainly conforming to the culture.

Also, before anyone says “but there are bad authoritarian leaders and good democracy leaders” – yes, I know. I just mentioned that there are many sickos running Islamic countries. However, if you were to break down those incentive structures, you would obviously find more patterns. Most obviously, the US overthrows any Islamic dictator who doesn’t play ball, and it is impossible to be a good leader while serving the US.

It seems it is much harder to find a good man in a democracy than it is to find a bad man in an autocracy, however. Thomas Massie seems like a good man. It’s basically a canard that he supports immigration. He isn’t a purist, but I’ve seen shills defending Israel make this claim. When Fuentes was everywhere, he brought it up every time Massie was mentioned. The claim is that NumbersUSA gives him an “F.” It’s actually a “C-” now.

If you look at the grade card, however, it is actually retarded. The “F” on “border security” is because he voted against the “Big Beautiful Bill.”

That bill allocated $3.4 trillion in money. Border security, broadly, was less than 5%. “You would have to be for open borders not to support the other 95% of this bill, whatever it may be” is not an adult position to take.

To be clear, he is not an absolutist anti-immigration activist like Trump pretended to be. But no one really is. He’s as good on immigration as anyone in Congress. It was only looking into this that I found out how worthless that NumbersUSA site is. What an absolute sham.

Regardless, he’s the closest thing you have to a good man in the US government, by a lot. But how far is he from the levers of powers? Trump/AIPAC might successfully primary him. They probably won’t, because Trump wants to attack him for remarrying too soon after his wife died instead of his immigration positions. Trump arguably can’t attack his immigration positions, given that Trump’s own immigration positions are much more extreme than Massie’s.

Marjorie seems to be a good person, despite being a woman. But she literally quit the government because everyone was evil. (NB4 “her personal life” – yeah, dude. She’s a woman.)

Liberal democracy is the transmutation of liberal economic policies into a political system, given that it is a system that is purely about money. We all go along with this stupid charade that we “vote in” politicians, but the actual reality is that the candidate for any relevant state or national office is decided during the primary, where whichever candidate with the most money gets the nomination. You then have two bought-and-paid-for candidates running against one another. (And in most districts, it doesn’t even matter as the way the maps are drawn, you already know which party is going to win.)

There is zero reason anyone would get involved in politics in a democracy other than to make money (and gain status, but I repeat myself). Maybe some moron thinks they are going to “change things.” I don’t know what kind of ego you would need to have to think that it’s as simple as “no one ever thought of that before.” You would just lose. Or maybe get offered the money and take it. Though a very rare occurrence, both AOC and MTG basically got elected on pure popular support, surprising the establishment. Then AOC sold out and MTG quit.

All the money is corruption money. The salaries of Congress people are basic middle class salaries. Yet these people are virtually all wealthy.

This is a big topic. It is clearly impossible to be in a democracy government and maintain morality, and it is impossible to become wealthy enough to change society through private sector behaviors and maintain morality. This whole idea of the alchemical equation of turning labor into tokens and then running them through machines that multiply them creates infinite corruption, and the only way to control it is through a state apparatus powerful enough to control it. That’s apparently how communism ends up with “the state as God.”

I don’t know what the solution is or think there is a solution. But it is obvious to me now that it is pointless to do anything and not address the issue that a system based around money is not a viable system for humans to live in. People talk about “wealth redistribution” under communism, but every system redistributes wealth. This system certainly does. When you turn everything into fungible tokens that are just floating around, and then you don’t control the flow of those tokens, you cannot have a meritocracy. Instead you end up with a kind of moralocracy where those with the lowest morals gain the most wealth.

That is not absolutely true. Someone can be clever and work an honest job and live a comfortable life, still. But that opportunity is being drained away, as wealth continues to be centralized more and more.

It’s a big issue and I’m still thinking through how to communicate it. Right now, this is already long. This was intended to be a “proof of life” post. I threw in “I converted to communism” because no one but me would think to say something like that.

I’ll come back to this issue soon.

I hardly ever watch YouTube. Most of my information, I read, as that is much easier. If I want some sound in the background to prevent me from having to manage my own thoughts, I listen to Rumble or normal podcasts.

When I do go to YouTube, it is just to watch Judge Napolitano’s interviews and a few other interview shows from people who don’t understand podcast feeds. I do not have YouTube cookies.

Every time I watch anything, which is basically always right-wing or libertarian content, I get redirected to the same communist Jew, Richard Wolff, host of Democracy At Work. I do not mean “communist Jew” in the colloquial sense of a cultural Marxist or something, this guy is literally an 80-year old Holocaust-escaper communist Jew.

I’ve used multiple IPs and devices and confirmed what anyone can confirm: if you go on YouTube with no cookies and watch 2-3 interviews about current events from a right-wing perspective, you will be redirected to the communist Jew Richard Wolff.

No one would watch this show. It is not high information. This 80-year-old Jew literally sounds like a high schooler who just started listening to Noam Chomsky YouTube videos because he heard him referenced on a punk rock album.

Don’t get me wrong. I actually have some respect here. He defends the USSR and modern China, and doesn’t talk about any of this “woke” stuff. He appears to just legit believe in communism.

But why am I seeing this material?

As you may recall, after Trump’s 2016 election, there was a mass hysteria over the YouTube algorithm “radicalizing” people. The claim was that it would feed people progressive more extreme right-wing content, so you would go from listening to Ben Shapiro to the Daily Stormer podcast. In reality, the algorithm doesn’t understand content (well, it didn’t back then), and it was simply trying to feed you content that would keep you on the site as long as possible, to show you the most ads, and it just so happened that “progressively more extreme right-wing content” is what kept people on the site the longest.

The algorithm was just formalizing the process that a lot of people were going through in 2017, where you start to become more and more comfortable with certain “problematic” ideas, and that leads you to progressively more problematic ideas. But the New York Times and others of course called for it to all be shut down. And shut it down they did.

What was happening after that, which I witnessed through the same process described above, was that after you watched something that YouTube had marked as “far right” (and not banned yet, for whatever reason), you would be led to either Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson, which have been identified as “deradicalizers” by the Google authorities. So, it was actively attempting to reverse your dive into right-wing content by pushing you back into Jew-approved versions of “right-wing” content.

But now apparently they’re just like “whatever, just feed them communism.”

It seems like this would not work quiet as well as feeding people Ben Shapiro, but it seems likely that feeding people Ben Shapiro just made them angry, while this 80-year-old communist Jew just makes people laugh.

Honestly, it seems like someone at the company is having a laugh. This has happened to me probably 12 times in the last few months, and every time I am zoned out (or zoned in) and not really paying attention to the computer voice, and then I hear “rights for workers” and I’m like “wait, wtf?” And then I look at the screen and see this ancient Jew droning on about Karl Marx and start laughing.

It’s of course sad that everything has to be so censored. Rumble has no discovery, really. It has “free speech,” but you have to know what you want to see, or it will lead you to Dave Rubin. But I’ve enjoyed Rumble. I was watching it yesterday, and I whistled for a cab, and when it came near, the license plate said “fresh” and there were dice in the mirror. If anything I could say that this cab was rare, but I thought “naw forget it, yo home to bel-air!” I pulled up to the house about seven or eight and I yelled to the cabbie “yo homes smell ya later!” Looked at my kingdom, I was finally there. To settle my throne as the prince of bel-air.

There’s a new sheriff in town, and he’s cleaning up the mess that white people have made of Chicago.

Brandon Johnson means business.

He’s bringing back grocery stores in a big way. If white racist grocery store owners don’t want to serve blacks, then the state will do it.

We will use the money of white tax payers to run a store where whites are forced to foot the bill for all of the things blacks steal.

Washington Times:

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is considering city-run grocery stores after several popular chains have shuttered outlets.

Mr. Johnson, a Democrat, said last week that his administration would enter a partnership with the progressive nonprofit group Economic Security Project to help place stores in the most needed areas around the city.

“We know access to grocery stores is already a challenge for many residents, especially on the South and West sides,” the mayor said in a statement. “My administration is committed to advancing innovative, whole-of-government approaches to address these inequities.”

Closing a store because blacks rob it is racism

The announcement comes after Walmart and Whole Foods closed some Chicago stores.

Walmart closed four stores in April, citing low profitability. While four Walmart stores remain open in the city, the closures were a significant blow to residents who had relied on the stores.

A Whole Foods store on the South Side closed in November, reducing affordable healthy options for residents.

The reaction to Mr. Johnson’s proposal was mixed. Some online said the mayor’s idea was forward-thinking, while others accused him of peddling communism.

Many others blamed a shoplifting epidemic for the exodus of grocery chains, which have seen significant losses in revenue. 

Whites will search for any excuse for racism.

Now it’s time to bring the race war to whites.

ROFL

There’s a new sheriff in town, and he’s cleaning up the mess that white people have made of Chicago.

Brandon Johnson means business.

He’s bringing back grocery stores in a big way. If white racist grocery store owners don’t want to serve blacks, then the state will do it.

We will use the money of white tax payers to run a store where whites are forced to foot the bill for all of the things blacks steal.

Washington Times:

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is considering city-run grocery stores after several popular chains have shuttered outlets.

Mr. Johnson, a Democrat, said last week that his administration would enter a partnership with the progressive nonprofit group Economic Security Project to help place stores in the most needed areas around the city.

“We know access to grocery stores is already a challenge for many residents, especially on the South and West sides,” the mayor said in a statement. “My administration is committed to advancing innovative, whole-of-government approaches to address these inequities.”

Closing a store because blacks rob it is racism

The announcement comes after Walmart and Whole Foods closed some Chicago stores.

Walmart closed four stores in April, citing low profitability. While four Walmart stores remain open in the city, the closures were a significant blow to residents who had relied on the stores.

A Whole Foods store on the South Side closed in November, reducing affordable healthy options for residents.

The reaction to Mr. Johnson’s proposal was mixed. Some online said the mayor’s idea was forward-thinking, while others accused him of peddling communism.

Many others blamed a shoplifting epidemic for the exodus of grocery chains, which have seen significant losses in revenue. 

Whites will search for any excuse for racism.

Now it’s time to bring the race war to whites.

ROFL

Based!

This is awesome.

You know who else did this?

I’ll give you three guesses. First two don’t count.

That’s right.

We hear constantly about the evil Nazi book burnings. They don’t tell you they were burning tranny books from the “Institute of Sexology” where a fat Jew invented trannies.

They never used to talk about which books the Nazis were burning. They had people thinking they were like, physics textbooks or something. Recently, however, as the tranny agenda has become popular, and they’ve wanted to associate anti-trannies with the Nazis, the Jews have started writing articles admitting that the books that were burned were tranny books.

This is from June of this year in the Jewish Daily Forward:

The Jew writer openly says that the Republicans are literal Nazis for trying to remove tranny material from children’s schools.

It’s a bold move.

I’ve found that boomers’ jaws drop when you say “you know which books they were burning, right?”

Not that boomers are going to get on board with a pro-Hitler agenda, but I think that the further away from World War II we get, the more people start to get the thing.

Even if you believe in the Holocaust, if you understand that Jews were doing in Germany what they are doing in America now, you start to have a “well, I don’t agree with it… but I understand” type situation.

Mexicans don’t care about the Holocaust, and it is utterly bizarre that the Americans are going there and forcing schools to push tranny stuff. Mexico is a hardcore Catholic country where the age of consent in some states is 12. They are very pro-family (at least until they come to America, at which point that all disappears into the anal ether – it’s also noteworthy that the ones coming here are all poor, and poor people tend to have much lower morality).

Obrador is a shill. He has his own agenda, but he is going to shill for America in every situation. However, the more America pushes this freak “anal for kiddies” stuff on the third world, the more they are going to be running to China, like “sirs, please help – these round-eyed pale skins are trying to stick things into my son’s butthole.”

Fox News:

Christian groups in Mexico have taken to the streets in protest of their department of education with one group burning books they believed was laced with “Marxist-communist” indoctrination last week, according to a report.

Parents in Mexico from Christian organizations have taken to the streets in the thousands to oppose new textbooks from the Ministry of Public Education they deem to contain sexual and gender ideology content, according to Mexico News Daily. At least 12,000 people attended. Aguascalientes is one of the 32 states which comprise the Federal Entities of Mexico.

Parents also burned the books in question in Chiapas, a southern Mexican state bordering Guatemala.

…

“At the elementary school in Chiapas… parents in the community piled up boxes of the new textbooks, doused them with fuel and set them afire,” the outlet reported.

The textbooks from the Mexican education department has mobilized parents into activism. Over 112,000 signatures were collected in a petition demanding the textbook’s distribution be stopped “because of sexualized and gender ideology content inserted without parental consultation.”

Mexican President López Obrador responded to the protest, claiming parents are “misinformed and manipulated” by a politicized agenda because they believe that the “virus of communism” is baked into the new, free textbooks.

…

In response to accusations the books were laced with gender ideology indoctrination, the president denied the claims, stating, “They have been prepared by teachers and experts.”

Here’s a video from a couple months ago with a Mexican former Congressman talking about how he was crucified for offending trannies:

Mexico went full tranny during the coronavirus hoax.

The United States exploited the chaos of that particular situation to try to force the whole world to go anal and even double anal (you read that right – double anal).

People really do not like this.

Whites are clearly the most tolerant of it.

Mexicans who are not totally tapped in politically presumably did not know their kids were being taught how to chop their dicks off until they opened up these textbooks. (We had a similar thing in America, where this was happening for years, and I was writing about it, and others were talking about it, but the masses thought of it as some remote and far-off thing until they found out it was in their kids’ school books.)

Mexico is deeply connected to the United States, obviously. However, it is likely you’re going to start to see more and more pushback. If 10% of Americans like the child tranny stuff, it’s probably less than 1% in Mexico.

The secret CCP communist party autocratic regime police station busted by the feds in New York City, it turns out, was not a secret and was actually a publicly advertised spot to… renew your drivers license.

DOJ claims that one of individuals arrested today, Chen Jinping, took part in a “clandestine” operation to run an illicit police station, even though his involvement was publicly advertised in promotional materials encouraging people to utilize the “service station” pic.twitter.com/bGlUGC2bUP

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) April 17, 2023

They’re using the phrase “police station” instead of “service station,” even though the latter is what it was actually referred to by the operators, to give the impression that this was some gigantic, intolerable infringement on US sovereignty by Communist Chinese infiltrators pic.twitter.com/c5ApVVOYDI

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) April 17, 2023

It’s really fantastical that the Merrick Garfield DOJ is engaging in these bizarre harassment stunts of rando Chinamen and then feeding it to the state media to present it as if the CCP is running a state within a state in American through license renewal schemes.

It doesn’t make strategic sense to constantly harass random Chinese people, as that creates a tit-for-tat inside China that makes it impossible for actual US spies to operate. China is just going to start mass deporting all of these English teachers/translators/advisors who are working as CIA spies.

It only makes sense in terms of domestic propaganda, and I’m not really even sure that is necessary. China has made zero real attempt to counter any narrative about them in English, so basically, every American is already ready for war with China.

And by the way – the US government is now confirming they are planning a war with China. They’re just working out the details.

They’re going to have a war in Taiwan, which literally does not make any sense at all, because China can just blockade the island and it is impossible for the US to get resources in, even if there were Taiwanese willing to fight their brothers in the name of gay marriage, which is highly doubtful in the first place.

Just to be clear, the US government is now openly stating as fact they are going to war with China.

I think everyone should probably be aware of that. https://t.co/doMMtDgggy

— Andrew Anglin (@WorldWarWang) April 20, 2023

If none of this seems to make sense, it’s because it does not make sense.

The people running things have lost their minds. They are not acting in rational self-interest, meaning that their actions are impossible to predict.

The situation is too far gone economically. The US burned itself to the ground, turned itself into this:

And then the trannies and the drugs and everything else. They literally turned over all their industry to China. They are simply not in a position to fight a war with anyone. They lost to Afghanistan.

They’ve turned their entire war machine on Russia, and they can’t even manage a stalemate.

Russia, like China, has real wealth. Russia can hold out. I’ve said since this China mania really started going psycho that they are going to have to ditch the Russia thing to start a war in Taiwan, and what is that going to do for morale? If any bit of this support was pulled, Russia is going to steamroll Kiev and force a big public surrender event. Zelensky isn’t going to kill himself in a bunker, I can tell you that. I guess he’ll probably flee (although that won’t exactly be pro-morale), but the entire Ukraine military is going to have to do this big surrender ritual and then submit to some pro-Russian Suzerain.

At what point do European states start breaking off?

Look at what Macron has been saying, let alone Orban. When do you get revolutions in Italy, Greece, and Spain?

The fear, apparently, is that China is preparing to commit to the Ukraine. I don’t even know if that is a fear or just something they know from intelligence. And then their plan is to try to prevent that by faking like they’re going to attack Taiwan?

The China-Russia military alliance is extremely powerful, and they now have virtually the entire third world’s resource base behind them. The most logical thing for the US to do at this point is to just surrender. That or get some kind of ultra-nationalist Hitler type figure ala Donald Trump to do some rapid rebuilding of the country, but these people are entirely fixated on ideology, which is the whole reason they’re doing this whole “world conquest” thing in the first place.

Here’s the only thing that makes sense: Jews in Silicon Valley are telling the entire government that they are on the verge of birthing a godlike artificial intelligence that will solve all of these problems.

Do they have a reason to be bluffing?

Could any of these boomers running the military and the DOJ tell the difference?

There is no room in a diverse utopia for people who don’t want to be attacked by the homeless.

The homeless are one of the greatest strengths of a democracy.

From the feminist website 4W:

A 20 years old black woman, “Jah,” from New York city, has been subjected to a relentless campaign of harassment, mostly by “progressive, leftist and/or marxist men,” after she complained on social media that she was physically assaulted by a homeless man. On October 9, Jah was on her way to work and stopped for breakfast at a Dunkin’ Donuts, when a homeless man allegedly asked her to buy him a donut, which she couldn’t afford. She says that the man became aggressive and hit her, left the store, waited for her outside and resumed the abuse.

When she finally managed to get to her train, Jah started typing a tweet about what had happened, which she posted in a short thread when she arrived at work, a “10 hour shift.” She got off work to find out that her story got over 3k likes but that there was also a “slow but steady influx of male communists, anarchists, and liberals” in her replies, harassing her.

The male harassers were making fun of her, calling her a liar and saying that she deserved the assault. Without phone service in the subway and tired from work, Jah went home and straight to bed. The next day, she allegedly woke up to “hundreds, if not thousands” of rape and death threats from leftist men on Twitter and Instagram.

The pile-on appeared to have started after a “communist man, with a substantial following” had tweeted out a screenshot of her tweet, together with a screenshot of her full profile. “For that alone,” Jay says, “they deemed me a genocidal fascist for saying I hated homeless men after being assaulted by one that same day and countless times before, and then for daring to want to protect myself from inevitable future incidents of harassment while navigating NYC subways.”

The online harassment went on for several days, Jah says, adding that the attacks turned even worse after these men found her social media activity concerning her radical feminist views.

just found out the “i hate homeless men” person is a terf lmaoooo

— sk (@kirkxxs) October 13, 2022

“They began threatening to doxx me, rape me and my mother, get me fired from my job, and get me expelled from school. And every single one of the men making these threats was a progressive, leftist and/or marxist,” Jah told 4W. “All these death and rape threats were overwhelmingly from men who claimed to value women’s rights.” Due to the relentless attacks, Jah made her Twitter account private because “eventually, it became too much” when she received private messages from men telling her that they wanted to kill and dismember her.

I always suspected leftists are the real racists

The young black lesbian, who is a full-time student working on minimum wages, claims she was attacked at a Dunkin’ Donuts nearby the train station she uses to go to work. She described the incident with the homeless man to 4W:

“I really could not afford it,” Jah said “and on top of that, after countless experiences of sexual and physical harassment by homeless men in NYC, after having been accommodating to them, I was completely fed up.” When the homeless man heard Jah saying no to buying him a donut, he became aggressive and started “yelling and cursing” at her.

“The cashier directed me to pay at the register beside her, but as I stepped to pay with my phone, the homeless man got in front of me, turned around and yelled at me,” Jah recounted. Initially scared, she started telling the man that she was just trying to pay for her order, but before she finished her sentence, he hit her in the head, leaving her, other customers and the staff “stunned.”

“And then I lost it,” said Jah. She yelled at him to get away from her and started looking for a pocket knife she carries for protection, after having survived several previous assaults by men – including other homeless men in her neighborhood. She says that the man then left, and she finished paying for her order. But when Jah left the store, the homeless man, who was waiting for her outside, confronted her again.

“He started walking towards me, cursing at me and saying how he was going to kill me, and that ”I was a woman and he was a man so I should know my place”. At this point, Jah says that she took her pocket knife out, told him to not come near her, and ran to her train, while he “yelled every misogynistic slur in the book” towards her. “I kept looking over my shoulder the rest of the way to work,” Jah recounted. With a mix of “sadness and anger,” she shared her ordeal on Twitter, but she soon was targeted by hundreds of men who, according to Jah, were forcing her to “frame her trauma” in a way that is “palatable for men.”

I’ve done that personally a lot – forced women to frame their trauma in a way that is palatable for me. However, I’ve never told a woman she needs to praise homeless drug people.

There's no amount of anything that can convince me that 'I hate homeless men' is any kind of understandable picture, especially not from a terf

— professional stay-at-home daughter 🏡 (@fluoresensitive) October 12, 2022

The issue with the "I hate homeless men b/c I hate all men!" argument is that you know damn well that homeless men are a group almost no one will actively defend and you're doing so to justify being as cruel as you want to someone who won't be able to stick up for themself

— Themperor Kennedy🐸🏳️‍🌈 (@kennedytcooper) October 11, 2022

"I hate all homeless men and want them to die, and im buying a gun to kill them with" is a fascist statement. I dont give a fuck about the hamsic in your bio, you're a white supremacist.

— 🔻 | Flat Bat | 🔻 (@justaflatbat) October 12, 2022

here's the thing, the one girl complaining about the homeless guy could've dropped the "I hate homeless men" and just said "I hate men". Like there was no reason to add "homeless" onto it, that's just man behavior you're complaining about.

— stale toaster crust (@staletoastcrust) October 14, 2022

the plots are converging. we are mere days until a radfem posts “i hate homeless men. today one wearing a white lives matter shirt asked me for money…” https://t.co/rBi8qXxz7l

— white mr. pibb (@craziestytboy) October 19, 2022

fuck that one woman who said "i hate homeless men" but like, why are we all theorizing that the harassment didn't happen? like, you can be a vile TERF bitch with reactionary views and Still be subject to harassment by men on the street, for god's sake, she's a black woman

— the southern red menace (@ohgodfuckno) October 13, 2022

not gonna put that "i hate homeless men" tweet on anyone's tl because enough people are dunking on it but i just can't imagine making a comment like that so confidently lol. also hammer and sickle in bio

— ️ (@teyrns) October 11, 2022

Yeah, super normal to say “i hate homeless men”… in nazi germany 1936 probably

— Potemkim (@LeninistAnonimo) October 12, 2022

Please watch the above video.

A crypto millionaire is putting up a million dollars in prize money for a fight between Sam Hyde and feminine Paki communist Hasan Piker.

Piker hasn’t actually refused technically, but he’s not responded, which is a refusal.

Earlier this week, I also offered to fight Piker, but I didn’t have a million in prize money.

Hasan Piker is a spineless pussy, and if he actually cared about his stupid commie cult, he’d get in the octagon with Sam and prove the masculine superiority of faggot DNC George Soros pseudo-communism.

“Come fucking get it,” Sam requested. Piker did not. Instead, he painted his fingernails a new color and then hunched over in a chair and ate food on a livestream.

Sam is straight-up stunting on this pussy.

He popped the top and did the dance.

Bitch faggot won’t even reply. Too busy to pick up a clean millie for punching Nazis.

This faggot goes on and on about how he’s going to use violence to enforce the George Soros global agenda, but he won’t do it for a million dollars.

This just proves once again that Pakistan sucks and everyone from that country is a faggot.

Pseduo-communist turkroach and internet streamer Hasan Piker is unquestionably the biggest forced meme in all of internet history. He is not likable, he offers nothing, and the people who watch him are basically in a Clockwork Orange type situation.

I don’t go on YouTube very often anymore – at all – I’m all in on Bitchute and Odysee. But the other day I was just watching some basic Fox News stuff on YouTube for some reason, and after about 3 Fox segments, YouTube started pushing “Breadtube” on me.

This is what they are doing. They are forcing everyone to watch Hasan Piker and Vaush. Twitter is doing the exact same thing, shoving these tweets in everyone’s face. These people are beneficiaries of a North Korea style promotional campaign.

Glenn Greenwald, who is an actual socialist and supporter of the old values of the left – in particular, freedom of speech and government transparency – is obviously frustrated by the fact that he is buried by the new fake algorithms while Piker and Vaush are pushed on impressionable retards.

The other day in Piker’s chat, someone asked him when he’s not covering Assange, and he insulted “Assange stans” and called them fascists, telling them to go hang out with the fascist Jimmy Dore. (Traditional leftists are all now fascists for questioning the government, according to Piker and Vaush, who define “socialism” as slavish and sycophantic devotion to Joe Biden and the CIA.)

Glenn pointed out Piker’s comments.

After denouncing "Assange stans" as creepy fascists who belong on the Jimmy Dore show in the above clip, @hasanthehun wants everyone to know that he then bravely said he is opposed to Assange being in "forever jail." What a stirring condemnation of the Biden Administration. ✊

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) December 11, 2021

He noted afterward that Piker confirmed that he doesn’t believe Assange should be put in jail forever, even though he hates him for doing journalism that harmed the Democrat Party. (He kind of had to say that, I think, like when he had to say he didn’t support the 911 attacks after saying he supported the 911 attacks.)

After Glenn called him out, Piker posted a video response and then he (or someone) deleted it from YouTube.

I hate when liberals/Media Matters-types take out-of-context video snippets of me and spread them all over to make it appear my views are the opposite of what I said. @hasanthehun insists the above video did that to his Assange views. Here's his defense:https://t.co/yDTkODqLUx

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) December 11, 2021

Greenwald and other “old left” figures have been very good in their defense of Assange, and I agree 100% with everything they’re saying.

Life-long CIA operative @John_Sipher — now of the @AtlanticCouncil (which helps Big Tech censor the internet) — hates Julian Assange and wants him to rot in prison. Sipher, like so many security state goons, became a big liberal social media stars in the Trump years. pic.twitter.com/maHjCL0iPP

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) December 11, 2021

I get that they hate Assange, but I’m still amazed by how few mainstream journalists understand that this case also impacts them personally. https://t.co/mlXPkUbqhg

— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) December 11, 2021

The JIMMY DORE SHOW Is Live! NOW!

Assange Facing Extradition! US Gov DEMANDS YouTube Censorship! w/ Guest Glenn Greenwald! @ggreenwald

Featuring Stef Zamorano! @miserablelib

Now streaming on Rumble, YouTube, Super U & Rokfinhttps://t.co/H0cAmiV8WU pic.twitter.com/m1lcw0RYmm

— Jimmy Dore (@jimmy_dore) December 11, 2021

Please remember that despite years of meaningless shrieking theatrics by corporate media, the most straightforward attack on press freedoms committed by the Trump Administration — the prosecution of Assange — is being continued by the Biden Administration, to minimal objection

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) December 10, 2021

US liberals want Assange to rot in prison for one reason only: his reporting in 2016 – based on true and accurate documents – reflected poorly on Hillary Clinton and the DNC. They believe opposing Democrats is a crime and want their adversaries imprisoned. They are a true menace.

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) December 10, 2021

Conversely, Hasan Piker is not only stupid, but fat.

As part of his initial “coming out” as a forced meme designed to replace everyone who was banned from the internet, he did a major steroid cycle.

During that period, he would wear tank tops on stream.

Now, he’s quit the roids – because no one can keep up that kind of regiment for very long – and his balls have not returned to producing natural testosterone (probably never did, actually), and he is fat. His posture is horrible. He only appears in very baggy t-shirts to hide the estrogen bloating that has resulted from destroying his body with roids.

The roid jawline has also totally dissolved.

He’s trying to cover that with a beard.

Hasan is a product, like the Backstreet Boys or Drake. He’s produced by a team of image managers. He’s the diametric opposite of PewDiePie (and even someone like the Amazing Atheist). The initial roid body, with all of these glamour pics that were released, was intended to make it look like being a male leftist doesn’t necessarily entail being an effeminate faggot. It was a kind of neat trick. But of course, he’s now back to being an effeminate faggot, and he just wears baggy shirts to pretend like there is something other than estrogen flab under there.

Note that no normal person who isn’t fat wears baggy shirts in current year. This is also something that was planned by the managers – “just wear baggy shirts and make it like you’re doing some retro 1990s bit, and we’ll keep making sure the roid pics from three years ago show up at the top of your image results.”

If Piker wants to do some kind of fitness contest with me, including fighting, I’m down for whatever. I’d prefer MMA obviously, but I’ll box. Whatever. It should be a good opportunity for him to “beat fascism.” Heck, I’ll do a decathlon. I’ve never played any of those sports, but I know for a fact that without training I could show up and beat this pudding pie.

If he wins, I’ll sign a statement declaring that Joe Biden is the greatest leader in the history of humanity. If I win, all he has to do is leave my country and return to his shithole and never come back.

I watched the Netflix Korean mini-series Squid Game and enjoyed it.

The show is about a group of people with life problems who agree to participate in a series of children’s games where if they lose they are killed. However, despite that premise, it is not a gore fest or torture porn. It’s relatively violent, but I didn’t find anything about it offensive.

After watching it, I found the leftist reviews of the show to be fully retarded. For example, here’s one at Forbes (which is now apparently a communist outlet). Forbes gives unmarked spoilers, for anyone who cares. The show is definitely more enjoyable if you don’t know how it ends. I originally thought this was a horror show, so I didn’t watch it, and instead read the entire plot synopsis on Wikipedia, which I regretted upon actually sitting down and watching it. Part of that is that the ending is really Asian and retarded, and takes away from the show’s strong points, which are the visuals, characters, and the function as a modern fairy tale. In general, the writing has a lot of problems, which makes advanced nuance in the meaning more difficult to interpret (more on that next time).

Here is the defining leftist analysis from fat, gay, thought-policer YouTuber Vaush:

The overwhelming success of Squid Game has forced conservatives into a position where they have no choice but to either pretend it’s a bad show or pretend it’s not the most obviously anti-capitalist piece of media to go mainstream since Parasite

— Vaush (@VaushV) October 21, 2021

I will write my own review in the future, and try to break down why the leftist analysis is so gay and retarded. Basically, the themes of the show relate to human problems and problems of modernity – not some nebulous “capitalism” spook.

Until I have time for my review, I wanted to share a comment from a reader, who hit on most of the points I myself had in my head.

This is pretty much spoiler free (though my review will not be).

He writes:

“Squid game has forced right-wingers to acknowledge capitalism is bad” says the guy who wants to ally with big corpo to ban people from the internet for making “racist jokes” despite saying the n-word himself. K

For leftists the word “capitalist” is a magic word. When you start investigating deeper it loses any meaning besides “some people are richer than me” and “greed is bad”. Characters in the show all end up playing Squid because they are all gambling addicts or something of the like, with rare exceptions.

What is the capitalist component here ? Gambling addiction ?

“But rich people get off on torturing poor people !”

Yeah, so what does that tell you about like Pol Pot who forced people with glasses to work the fields for barely any pay or African warlords that throw prestigious ceremonies that bankrupt their countries while doing human sacrifices ? Third world “anti-capitalist” shitholes don’t have human trafficking, torture, etc. ? Or leaders in Socialist countries living like kings while everyone else starves ?

AnCom leftists will then say “hierarchy and oppression” is the problem in a general way. But that’s like saying water is wet.

The more you dig in the less meaning “anti-capitalist” has, especially coming from champagne socialists like Hasan Piker and Vaush. To them “capitalism” is some magic juju.

If we are talking about high degrees of social inequality, then yes, I do agree that having 0,0001% of people control 50% of resources is bad because it makes them unaccountable, lose touch with reality and so on. But that is not an exclusively “capitalist” problem, see any third world shithole and socialist states. That is a general human problem.

Moreover, this situation was caused by government intervention. Not to be a libertrarian, but all these oligarchs are government monopolists. That’s just a fact.

So while I do agree with Vaush that unaccountable billionaires is bad, I do not believe this is somehow an exclusively “capitalist” problem, having seen how people live in shitholes. Also, the solution is some kind of pro-Middle Class mixed economy, with some freedom of enterprise and breaking of monopolies, so alternatives to Youtube/Facebook/Mastercard can appear.

But Vaush doesn’t really care anyway. They would rather harass a right-winger for questioning the number of genders then do anything about Bill Gates besides calling him “toxicly White bigoted” etc. and argue that somehow Middle Class White people are also a problem because they are also White toxicly bigoted or defend gay black millionaires because they are black and gay and therefore still oppressed.

I don’t take these people seriously anymore. They are a caricature, they are static noise. They should just be ignored at this point.

Leftist star Hasan Piker sparks debate over his $2.7 million L.A. mansion

‘Went from criticizing Rich Boomers to becoming a Rich Boomer’: Influencer from ‘OK Boomer’ TikTok criticized after showing off her $2 million apartment

As I say, those were many of the same points I had. In particular, the fact that all of the characters had serious personal problems that caused them to end up playing a game show to the death doesn’t mix with the idea that the show is somehow purely designed to promote some kind of political ideology.

Also, very obviously, like virtually all South Korean media, the show attacks the DPRK, meaning that it is definitely not promoting actual communism.

Also, though Vaush is too dumb and dishonest to really respond in any kind of serious way, I would also note that when he says that rightists would have to say the show is bad or admit that communism is good, he’s misunderstanding the basic nature of the disagreement between right and left. Right-wingers are not so obsessed with making everything political, and even if he was right, and this is a communist show, rightists would be able to appreciate the show on artistic merit.

Ironically, the show should be offensive to Vaush, who only really cares about enforcing the bizarre Democrat social agenda. There are no gays or diversity, and the female characters are hardly strong females – instead using sex and psychological manipulation to survive the game.

At the very least, Squid Game is mostly well done and actually worth discussing, making it unique in the current media climate.