🚨BREAKING: We released an ALARMING report shedding light on the widespread expansion and troubling reality of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) requirements across America’s colleges and universities– and their detrimental impact on free speech. 🧵 pic.twitter.com/8itiM1C2kz

— Speech First (@Speech_First) April 11, 2024

You can’t graduate from a US university unless your ass is lubed up and ready for the world.

In the modern world, if you want to be a success, you need your asshole lubed up.

This is just basic democracy.

New York Post:

Most American colleges and universities require the completion of courses that emphasize Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)-related topics to graduate, according to a new report surveying public and private institutions.

Speech First, a group advocating for First Amendment rights on US campuses, released an investigation on Thursday that found 165 of 248 selected institutions — from American University to Williams College — mandate DEI-related classes to meet general education requirements.

The classes “place students into identitarian groupings based on racial, sexual, and political characteristics to create a rigid framework amongst students where they only see each other as either the ‘oppressor’ or the ‘oppressed,’” the executive summary of the 33-page report states.

Speech First looked for trainings and courses that included an “anti-racist” approach, which often denounces “whiteness” or “white supremacy,” as well as the existence of forced “DEI Statements” in which faculty pledge to promote the ideology if hired.

The group also searched for the use of terms like “intersectionality,” “toxic masculinity,” “critical gender theory,” “ableism,” “implicit bias,” “systemic racism” and “social justice.”

All very important terms that mean “lube up your ass and get ready.”

“Consequently, this erosion of merit-based principles and build-up of anti-American sentiment has had detrimental impacts on the quality of education and has fostered an environment where conservative voices are systematically marginalized, discredited, and silenced,” the report states.

“As DEI departments have grown on campuses, we have seen an increase in campus policies that regulate, monitor, and restrict student speech,” it adds. “The inquiry revealed that students are subjected to courses advocating far-left ideological perspectives and pushing far-left political advocacy.”

The report suggests that the banning of DEI and critical race theory courses and the adoption of free speech programs during freshman orientation would change the leftward drift of America’s higher education institutions.

It also advocated for a return to the study of the nation’s founding principles under the Constitution as a part of general education requirements nationwide.

Honestly, you don’t even have to ban the courses. Making them mandatory is insane, but the real problem is the free speech issue, where you’re not allowed to disagree with any of this stuff.

If you had a class about DEI where students were allowed to stand up, to write papers giving real criticisms of the doctrine, that could actually be helpful in deconstructing it in a critical way.

The problem is that no criticism is allowed, as these Jews have decided they are the moral arbiters of reality and that no one is allowed to question anything.

ADL Center for Antisemitism Research’s new study w/ @HillelIntl — first fielded in August & again following Oct. 7 — reveals a staggering 73% of Jewish students experienced or witnessed #antisemitism on campus since the start of the 2023/24 academic year: https://t.co/WcY5AdmyNd pic.twitter.com/BNmFgYbuyQ

— ADL (@ADL) November 29, 2023

See: The Antisemitism Hoax has Officially Collapsed. Jews Don’t Know It Yet, But It’s Over.

Jews are whining about anti-Semitism again?

I never would have expected that.

New York Post:

Jewish college students are experiencing or witnessing an alarming rise in on-campus antisemitism in the weeks since Hamas’ shock attack on Israel.

Nearly 73% of Jewish students have seen or been the victim of antisemitism since the start of the semester, an increase from 63% in 2021, according to a study by the Anti-Defamation League and Hillel International obtained by The Post Wednesday.

By comparison, 44% of non-Jewish students have experienced or witnessed such acts in the same time period.

Sixty-seven percent of Jewish students said they felt physically safe on campus before Oct. 7, the study of 3,084 college students — including 527 who were Jewish — from 689 campuses across the country found.

That dropped to 46% after the terror group’s attack.

Sixty-six percent of Jewish respondents felt emotionally safe on campus before the war began, a number that plummeted to 33% after.

In addition, 64% polled said their universities were “welcoming and supportive” of them prior to the invasion, while only 44% felt the same in the aftermath.

“Jewish students are experiencing a wave of antisemitism unlike anything we’ve seen before, but shockingly, non-Jewish students barely see it,” ADL CEO Jonathan A. Greenblatt, ADL CEO, said in a statement.

Since October, seven schools have been placed under a federal investigation for antisemitism and islamophobia — including three Ivy Leagues: Cornell, Columbia, and the University of Pennsylvania.

The schools could lose federal funding if they do not comply with the Department of Education’s recommendation after the probe is concluded, according to CNN.

It’s unbelievable that Jews think that now is a really good time to claim to be the victims.

While the world is watching them kill babies, they say: “you know what, now seems like a really good time to whine about how we are victims.”

It’s not going to end well.

The six Supreme Court Justices who voted to end affirmative action vs the three who did not.
Any questions? pic.twitter.com/pU2IfnMXJ3

— Jo🌻 (@JoJoFromJerz) June 29, 2023

This was a long time coming.

However, it won’t really change anything in a tangible way for most people. These schools are all committed to ethnically cleansing white men, and they can’t really be prevented from passing their own rules to cockblock whites.

Reuters:

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday struck down race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, effectively prohibiting affirmative action policies long used to raise the number of Black, Hispanic and other underrepresented minority students on campuses.

In a blockbuster decision that will force many American colleges to overhaul their admissions policies, the justices ruled in favor of a group called Students for Fair Admissions, founded by anti-affirmative action activist Edward Blum, in its appeal of lower court rulings upholding programs used at the two prestigious schools to foster a diverse student population.

Powered by the court’s conservative justices with the liberal justices in dissent, the court ruled in favor of a group called Students for Fair Admissions, founded by anti-affirmative action activist Edward Blum, in its appeal of lower court rulings upholding programs used at the two prestigious schools to foster a diverse student population. The vote counts were 6-3 against UNC and 6-2 against Harvard.

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority said, “Harvard and UNC admissions programs cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause,” referring to the U.S. Constitution’s promise of equal protection under the law.

In major rulings last year with far-reaching societal implications also spearheaded by the conservatives justices, the court overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had legalized abortion nationwide and widened gun rights in a pair of landmark rulings.

Roberts said that students “must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual not on the basis of race. Many universities have for too long done just the opposite. And in doing so, they have concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice.”

It’s too little, too late.

The damage is done.

Previous admission standards assured that these schools are now run by Jews, women, and unhinged mulattoes.

Schools will continue to do this discrimination, and they will get sued, and then if they lose, they will just keep doing it. They won’t be criminally punished. No one will be arrested.

When @Riley_Gaines_ asked University of Pittsburgh professor Gabby Yearwood if an archeologist could differentiate between two sets of bones as male and female, Professor Yearwood. who calls himself the “expert in the room,” answers “no” to which the entire audience laughed. pic.twitter.com/Ecxs1NMDTr

— Independent Women’s Forum (@IWF) March 30, 2023

When the self-proclaimed “expert in the room” is offended that his assertion that males & females don’t have distinct skeletal differences is laughable, one might wonder what students studying anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh are being taught by their professors? pic.twitter.com/5NtFLn4P9p

— Independent Women’s Forum (@IWF) March 30, 2023

We’ve been saying it for a while now, and it really should have been obvious to everyone: university professors are just going to start outright lying to students.

They are going to rewrite the textbooks in order to have them say things that are known to be totally factually incorrect, on a basic level.

You see: when they do historical revisionism in television dramas, when they make characters in Shakespeare black, they are doing that as a dry run for rewriting supposedly non-fiction materials.

This process of simply lying to students about things that are not even controversial has already begun.

New York Post:

A “woke” University of Pittsburgh anthropology professor denied there’s a difference in male and female bone structure during a discussion about gender, sparking disbelief and outrage.

“If you were to dig up a human — two humans — a hundred years from now, both a man and a woman, could you tell the difference strictly off of bones?” Riley Gaines is shown in footage asking during the lecture.

“No,” professor Gabby Yearwood replies, according to footage posted on Twitter.

The response sparked appalled laughter from students, including Gaines, who describes herself on Twitter as a former University of Kentucky swimmer who believes there are “only two sexes.”

Yearwood then insists that he’s the “expert in the room,” according to FOX News.

“Have any of you been to anthropological sites? Have any of you studied biological anthropology? I’m just saying, I’ve got over 150 years of data, I’m just curious as to why I’m being laughed at,” he said before later declaring, “I have a PhD!”

Gabby Yearwood, owner of a PhD.

But his “woke” and “unscientific” claim drew heated skepticism on social media Friday.

“This is how far removed the Left is from reality that they must deny basic scientific facts,” tweeted the Independent Women’s Forum, a non-profit focused on economic policy issues.

“When the self-proclaimed “expert in the room” is offended that his assertion that males & females don’t have distinct skeletal differences is laughable, one might wonder what students studying anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh are being taught by their professors,” the group added.

This is a world of lies, because America is a satanic country literally run by the Jews.

It’s never been clear why people assumed that science was going to be objective.

They told you that that deadly vax they forced on everyone was “The Science.” That’s what they think of scientific facts. They do not respect anything that gets in the way of their anal agenda, including basic facts that were totally agreed upon by everyone last Thursday.

As a @PittTweet alum, I’m glad @Riley_Gaines_ asked her question and the students gave the appropriate response—laughter—to the professor’s answer. His appeal to authority and credentials is a tell-tale sign of a weak argument. https://t.co/Zt47pkEPlo

— Delano Squires (@DelanoSquires) March 30, 2023

As far as I’ve been able to gather, there is no way to repeal affirmative action without totally repealing the Civil Rights Act. Legal scholars have argued this for decades, and having looked into it, it’s the conclusion I came to.

The Supreme Court is not going to throw out the Civil Rights Act, so it seems to me that all of this talk about Affirmative Action is just a total waste of time.

But it’s not totally a waste of time, because at least we’re getting a bunch of news articles about how, if you ended affirmative action, there would be no brown people in universities.

Reuters:

If the U.S. Supreme Court bans the consideration of race in college admissions, enrollment of minority groups at selective colleges will likely stall or decline – even if the schools give more weight to factors such as class, a new study found.

The conservative-leaning court will issue rulings this spring in cases questioning the legality of race-conscious admissions at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.

Students for Fair Admissions, the group suing Harvard and UNC, argues that class-conscious admissions would allow schools to create a diverse student body and boost disadvantaged students without focusing on race.

But a study released on Tuesday by Georgetown University’s Center on Education and the Workforce found that admissions practices that consider class but not race would still leave selective colleges without the representation of Black, Hispanic, Indigenous and Pacific Islander students seen in U.S. high schools.

“Niggers are remarkably stupid,” the authors of the paper explained. “If niggers are forced to compete with the Aryan race, they always fail.”

(I’m just kidding, they didn’t say that. But that is the vibe here, no? How else are you supposed to read that?)

There is a colored woman on Twitter claiming that colored people will succeed without Affirmative Action:

The funny thing about bigoted claims like this? You’re seeing more diversity at prestigious institutions because without Jim Crow barriers BIPOC people are going to outperform legacy applicants. They expect bias so they do more than rely on one extracurricular & Daddy’s name https://t.co/yy5KXIh5ea

— Mikki Kendall (@Karnythia) March 27, 2023

The message that we had to work twice as hard to get half as far really sunk in. But it is easier to blame affirmative action than to admit whiteness isn’t enough to succeed any more

— Mikki Kendall (@Karnythia) March 27, 2023

Either she is saying that only because she knows AA will not be thrown out, or she is actually very low IQ. Whichever is the case, it goes to prove the point.

But hey – maybe that would happen? Maybe if you removed AA, blacks would really start competing hard, and actually earn their spots? It’s possible. I mean, it’s probably not possible if you consider test scores, because that seems like a hard wall for the blacks, but maybe we can pressure them into developing higher IQs?

We should at least try to prove this woman’s theory.

Deeply saddened by the news from the Taliban banning women attending University education! It is every woman’s right & basic human right to attend education!
The act of these men is setting the development of the country back 100 years! #Afganistan #WomensRights pic.twitter.com/PAP08HIsRh

— Dr. kochar walladbegi (@dr_walladbegi) December 21, 2022

#BREAKING

Today, the Taliban group prevented the girls from going to Kabul University by whipping them.@Fawziakoofi77 @lifeline_intl @ZarminaParyani @parwana_ibra @NilofarAyoubi @Axel_Steier @SE_AfghanWGH @hrw @cvoule @SR_Afghanistan @unwomenafghan @UN_Women @UNHumanRights pic.twitter.com/EXddx8ehCp

— Afghanistan Womens And Children S.W.O (@AWCSWO) December 21, 2022

Female students screaming outside Takhar university in Afghanistan after not being allowed in by the Taliban guards.

“Let me scream! What are you afraid of? What more is there left for them to take from us?”

My heart aches.
pic.twitter.com/Tdz4Dwg4yp

— Shabnam Nasimi (@NasimiShabnam) December 21, 2022

The brave & talented women of Afghanistan are devastated this morning as the Taliban prevent them from entering their universities following the BAN on female university education.

This is horrifying to watch. This isn’t right. We mustn’t stay silent.

pic.twitter.com/GBl3zQW1o5

— Shabnam Nasimi (@NasimiShabnam) December 21, 2022

You love to see it!

These women should just behave themselves – then they won’t need WHIPPED!

Reuters:

Female university students in Afghanistan were turned away from campuses on Wednesday after the Taliban-run administration said women would be suspended from tertiary education.

The decision to bar women was announced on Tuesday evening in a letter to universities from the higher education ministry, drawing condemnation from foreign governments and the United Nations.

“We went to university, the Taliban were at the gate and told us ‘you are not allowed to enter the university until further notice’ … everyone was crying,” said Shaista, a business studies student at a private university in Kabul.

Third-year political science student Hassiba, based in Kabul, said she was studying for her exams when she heard about the announcement.

“It’s too hard to accept, it’s unbelievable, I can’t believe it’s happening,” she said.

“When there is no education for women in a society, how can we be hopeful for a bright future?”

According to the late Tuesday announcement, the decision was made by the Taliban administration’s cabinet.

Several Taliban officials, including the deputy foreign minister and administration spokesperson, have spoken out in favour of female education in recent months.

The supreme Taliban spiritual leader, based in the southern city of Kandahar, has the final say on major decisions.

Diplomatic and Taliban official sources have told Reuters the issue had been under discussion by the leadership.

“This decision had been anticipated for weeks, prompting some Western officials to start talking about additional sanctions and further economic restrictions,” said Graeme Smith, senior consultant at International Crisis Group.

“But the flood of outrage from the West will strengthen the resolve of the Taliban leadership, which defines itself as a bulwark against the outside world.”

It’s a bulwark of sanity in an insane world!

These are the only people I see making any sense!

Amazing, just listen the wordplay of Taliban spox on “Sharia & Women Rights”

📽️01:50
Reporter: U have a daughter. Do u think she deserves equal rights when she grows up to be a woman

Zabihullah Mujahid: No. There are laws for women & laws for men.
We don’t have 50/50 equal rule pic.twitter.com/e0rj6UsTvP

— 𝐏𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐲𝐮𝐬𝐡 𝐒𝐚𝐲𝐚𝐧 𝐁𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐰𝐚𝐣 (@PratushSayan) February 16, 2022

#Taliban gets asked by journalist if they would accept a democratic system that voted in female politicians.

The response? Hysterical laughing – then “stop filming, it made me laugh”

pic.twitter.com/4qj3sl2zHu

— Emily Schrader – אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر (@emilykschrader) August 17, 2021

TALIBAN TELLS CNN REPORTER TO “STAND ASIDE” BECAUSE SHE’S A WOMANpic.twitter.com/KyOBtZxF3B

— The_Real_Fly (@The_Real_Fly) August 16, 2021

You enslaved the blacks, goyim.

Now you must pay up – and I mean pay up big time. 

AP:

For Brown University students, the Ivy League college’s next step in its yearslong quest to atone for its legacy of slavery is clear: Pay up.

Nearly two decades after the Providence, Rhode Island, institution launched its much-lauded reckoning, undergraduate students this spring voted overwhelmingly for the university to identify the descendants of slaves that worked on campus and begin paying them reparations.

At the University of Georgia, community activists want the school to contribute to Athens’ efforts to atone for an urban renewal project that destroyed a Black community in the 1960s to make way for college dorms.

Like what? Like bought the property from them?

Or made them move to different Section 8 government housing?

How did they “destroy” a black community?

Did they go in and machine gun down the blacks?

Did they bomb them at take their land like the Jews do?

How does the Associated Press leave “destroyed a black community” just hanging in the air like that?

And at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., there’s growing dissatisfaction among some slave descendants about the Catholic institution’s pioneering reparations efforts.

Nearly a year after the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police sparked the latest national reckoning on racism, student and community activists from New England to the Deep South are demanding institutions take more ambitious steps to atone for past sins — from colonial-era slavery to more recent campus expansion projects that have pushed out entire communities of color.

“There’s been a shift in America,” said Jason Carroll, who was student council president during the spring referendum at Brown University. “We’re at a different place. Just a few years ago, it was controversial to say ‘Black Lives Matter.’”

The 22-year-old Maryland native, who graduated this month, argues Brown has taken nearly every conceivable step to atone for its past — save for making slave descendants whole.

The school released an exhaustive historical report in 2006 and followed it up with the dedication of a slavery memorial in 2014, among other efforts. An “Anti-Black Racism” task force is expected to deliver recommendations soon for how the school can further promote racial equity. But university spokesperson Brian Clark stressed it’s not clear whether the panel, which was formed following last summer’s racial unrest, will address reparations.

“There’s real trauma and pain here,” said Carroll, who is descended from Carolina slaves. “This shouldn’t just be an academic question. There are real families that have been burdened and harmed by this — and probably still are.”

Students at Harvard are similarly calling for reparations after years of headline-grabbing announcements from the school, including dropping the law school emblem, which was derived from the crest of a slave-owning family. A panel looking at the university’s slave legacy plans to release its findings and recommendations later this year.

At the University of Chicago, students are frustrated that the university continues to distance itself from its slavery ties, even as it touts efforts to advance racial equity and justice, said Caine Jordan, a graduate student who co-authored a recent report on the school’s fraught racial history.

Last year, the university removed markers honoring U.S. Sen. Stephen Douglas, but maintained the Mississippi slave plantation owner donated land to an older version of the school and had “ no connection ” to the current one.

“All of it rings hollow if you’re founded on Black pain, and you’re not willing to acknowledge that,” Jordan said.

A university spokesperson declined to respond, but said University President Robert Zimmer will provide an update soon on the school’s racial equity efforts.

Yes, I’m sure Robert Zimmer will get right on that, won’t he.

It is amazing that these Jews are all over the place talking about how evil white people are and about how much white people owe the blacks, and no one notices it.

What is more is that the blacks obviously believe that all of this praise is raining down on them as a result of their riots.

The media has totally incentivized black violence with this George Floyd program.

Of course, blacks are not going to get much from these university reparations programs.

These schools are going to charge white students extra money (which is actually illegal, but they’re going to do it anyway), and then take a small percentage of the money and give it to the blacks, who will promptly blow it on crack cocaine, lottery tickets and spinning rims, and be no better off than they were before a couple days later. The majority of the money will be sucked up in some Jewish funnel cloud and disappear.

The point isn’t the money: the point is to humiliate white people. Making them pay money for things they didn’t do is a way to debase and humiliate them.

…for now…

These results are quite what you’d expect.

They’re actually better than you’d expect, because usually it is only white people that believe in freedom of speech, and these universities are definitely not 58% white.

Daily Mail:

Some 41 percent of college students say hate speech shouldn’t be protected under the First Amendment, according to a new survey.

Just 58 percent said that hate speech should be protected under the amendment, which guarantees American’s a right to freedom of speech, according to the survey of 4,407 students by the Miami-based Knight Foundation.

In other news, we’re not officially casually including “nonbinary” data in polls.

Opinions split dramatically along gender lines, with just 41 percent of college women saying that protecting free speech was more important that inclusivity, compared to 71 percent of college men.

More than two-thirds (68 percent) of respondents said they felt that students can’t openly express their views due to a climate on campus that has people fearful of offending their peers.

Just 31 percent disagreed that such a climate exists.

These opinions of young Americans on the matter of freedom of speech are problematic – if well intended, said Ken Paulson, the director of the Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University.

‘Protecting hate speech is actually the reason we have a First Amendment,’ he told DailyMail.com. ‘We don’t need protection for freedom of speech if everyone agrees with one another. The protection we need is for speech that others may find offensive.’

…

The report also found that more than half (53 percent) are in favor of protecting freedom of speech, while 46 percent say it’s important to ‘promote an inclusive and welcoming society.’

Jews lol

The survey also found that a majority of Mormon (81 percent), white evangelical Protestant (71 percent), white mainline Protestant (64 percent) and Catholic (62 percent) students felt that protecting free speech is more important than inclusivity.

By comparison, a majority of Jewish students (65 percent) and non-religious students (54) said that inclusivity is more important than free speech.

In addition, just 39 percent of college students knew that freedom of speech is protected by the Constitution, according to a separate 2017 survey of 1,500 students by the Brookings Institution and UCLA.

Some 44 percent said free speech was not protected and an additional 16 percent said they didn’t know either way.

Is any of this shocking?

• 4 in 10 students say hate speech shouldn’t be protected speech
• Most women prefer “inclusivity” over freedom of speech
• Mormons and WASPs – the only original Americans – care the most about the First Amendment
• Jews are the least supportive of free speech

As demographics continue to change, fewer and fewer people will support the First Amendment. Once the majority wants to abolish freedom of speech, the First Amendment will be… amended.

That is close to happening. College campuses are a good indication of future society-wide thought patterns. The Jews know the influential power of the university, which is why they’ve infiltrated it to push their destructive thought-viruses.

Women are drooling retards that crave being slapped in the face and told to shut the fuck up, which is why they don’t mind losing their ability to speak freely — they don’t have anything interesting to say anyways.

Jews and their puppets (the Godless, the hedonists, the analists and the progressives)… what a shocking surprise that they want to shut it down.

One day soon, having a degree from a college in the English-speaking world will be something to be ashamed of, something to hide, something you’ll need to apologize for, something that will lower your chances of getting a job. That day can’t come soon enough.

Breitbart:

ATL Wales president Leslie Tipping said mandatory training on gender identity issues is long overdue, lamenting that staff were confused over pronouns.

Hey look, another fucking woman.

“Lecturers could be put in quite an embarrassing position if they address someone as a he who is a she or neither a he or a she,” said the union boss  — warning that without proper training, staff “could end up with legal issues”.

You mean getting sued or getting arrested? This being Britain, I assume both are possible.

Declaring that students who identify as transgender or ‘non-binary’ — the latter status referring to people who claim to be neither male nor female — have “entitlements”, the union boss said compulsory training would help FE staff “understand legalities.”

Without mandatory training, Ms Tipping lamented that it is only ‘pro-active’ colleges which are making staff undergo instruction in transgender identity politics.

I identify as someone who has PTSD from reading this kind of garbage. Where’s my reparations?

LGBT+ officer for NUS Wales Jasper Williams said sixth form college staff “struggled” when the neuropsychology student declared transgender status.

“One [sixth form] teacher couldn’t get anything that wasn’t male or female,” Williams told BBC News.

“He made comments making it sound like non-binary genders made up and like a fantasy idea.

THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE YOU WORTHLESS SUBHUMAN!

The Bangor University student said that while the college was led by a “liberal and encouraging” head teacher, staff “messed up a lot” with regards to the etiquette demanded by LGBT activists.

The only demand you “people” have that I could accept fulfilling is a happy meal right before you go in the bog.

Facilities were also an issue for transgender and ‘non-binary’ students, according to the LGBT activist, bemoaning: “Toilets were very gendered apart from the disabled on the ground floor which I didn’t feel comfortable using.”

BBC Wales contacted the 14 FE colleges in Wales to ask what “gender diversity” training they off to staff, to which three responded — all reporting an increase in the number of students claiming transgender, ‘non-binary’ or ‘genderfluid’ status.

Cardiff and Vale College said all members of staff have received training which included “protected characteristics”, with “more detailed, bespoke training” given to teachers whose subjects attract a large number of “gender diverse” students. The college it added it was working with Trans Form Cymru to create a more detailed action plan and more training.

Coleg Cambria reported that all front line staff were given training delivered by the transgender community, and that each college site has gender neutral toilets.

Next time you hear about a mass shooting at a college, remember that the guy with the gun is probably saner than most of the people he’s shooting.

Yeah, these Whites at SUNY are nothing but trouble…

One of the more overlooked but totally awesome aspects of all this White Privilege we have is the responsibility to pay for our own genocide via taxation, whether we want to or not. So, in keeping with this top spot we have on the multicultural totem pole, White taxpayers now have to fund a “Stop White People” training course for Residential Assistants at SUNY.

The Daily Wire:

The State University of New York (SUNY) at Binghamton is now offering a course called “#StopWhitePeople2K16” as part of routine training for residential assistants.

The university’s residential assistant training schedule lists “#StopWhitePeople2016” on its roster, with the mission of giving RA’s an “overview of disabilities in Higher Education.”

Marvelous…

The presenters of the course, Ciaran Slattery, Nicholas Pulakos, and Urenna Nwogwugwu (click on their names to contact them via social media), are all RAs at the state-funded college, which describes itself as New York’s highest-ranking public college. They state their purpose is to “help others take the next step in understanding diversity, privilege, and the society we function within,” presumably the “white” society they plan to “stop” at the event.

The three RAs claim they will give “#StopWhitePeople2K16” course attendees the “tools” to respond to “uneducated people” with “‘good’ arguments.” You know, the people who preach mutual respect, equality under God, and constitutional freedoms. Those people.

Yeah, it’s so hard to refute those good but ignorant type things! I guess they mean that people who understand statistics, demographics, and history are “ignorant.”

I’d love to see any new refutation they have, but as a battle-hardened social media Nazi, I think I already know them. Let’s go through a few and see if you’ve heard them as well.

1. Whitey beez racist an’ sheeit!
2. Remember the holocaust goyim, my bubbe was gassed seven times!
3. Systemic blah blah blah
4. Privilege blah blah blah
5. Equality blah blah blah
6. We wuz kangz!
7. You stole this land
8. Slavery
9. Colonialism
10. Slaves built America (because America is made of cotton)
11. You cavemen ain’t gots no melanin
12. MUH DIK!!!

So you can see why these these Marxist collegians feel the need to up their game a bit. Problem is, every time they try to “deconstruct White Privilege,” all they end up doing is unraveling their putrid anti-White nonsense so that everyone can see how ridiculous and hateful they are.

Somehow, some way, we must stop these ignorant racists from killing us with the logic!

And now they’ve descended to such a stupendously cretinous level that they’re actually getting their “color of the skin” argument thrown back in their faces!

College RAs hold important roles in college residential and dormitory life, serving as mentors, counselors, and peers to the student residents they oversee. “These people should be sensitive to the issues of their residents, and to be prejudiced against someone on the basis of his or her skin color would seem, just like the hashtag itself [#stopwhitepeople2016], petty,” student Howard Hecht noted.

The anti-racist Humpty Dumpty is teetering on his wall. When he falls, no one will try to put him back together.

Omelette, anyone?