An American Airlines Boeing 777-223(ER) plane (N772AN) clipped the wing tip of a Frontier Airlines Airbus A321-211 plane (N714FR) at Terminal E at Logan Airport in Boston, Massachusetts on 25 November.

No injuries were reported which occurred at a Terminal E gate while… pic.twitter.com/AYCvpILnsC

— FL360aero (@fl360aero) November 25, 2024

🚨#BREAKING: Emergency crews are on the scene after two planes clipped wingtips on the tarmac

📌#Boston | #Massachusetts

Emergency crews are currently on the scene at Logan Airport in Boston, Massachusetts, after two planes operated by American Airlines and Frontier Airlines… pic.twitter.com/JZPyMV1soe

— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) November 25, 2024

We need more women and black people working at the airport.

The competency crisis in the airline industry is a problem that only affirmative action can solve.

New York Post:

An already hectic holiday travel day was made more chaotic with two separate plane collisions on the tarmac at Boston Logan International Airport just hours apart on Monday.

In the first crash, an American Airlines jet that was taxiing to its gate clipped the wing of a parked Frontier Airlines plane, local ABC affiliate station WCVB reported.

“That was terrible. It was very scary. All of a sudden, ‘thump.’ It sounded like something fell from below,” Evelyn Pipione, a Frontier passenger, told the news station.

Video obtained by Storyful shows the battered wing of the smaller Frontier plane underneath the wing of the larger American aircraft.

“So, you can see the wing actually broke on the bottom, so the bigger plane — the wing is over, and then ours is cracked at the bottom,” Douglas Garcia, who took the footage, told WCVB.

…

Hours later, a JetBlue airplane that was being towed by a vehicle smacked into a Cape Air plane that had just landed at Logan from Nantucket and was waiting for a gate to open, the local station reported.

As demographics continue to get browner, and as women assume their correct role in charge of everything, we are going to see more and more exciting events at airports, like taxing planes crashing into each other constantly, as well as serious air disasters of the kind you see in films, such as the films of Michael Bay.

Affirmative action not only helps women and the blacks, it helps all of us by making our lives so much more exciting.

An American Airlines Boeing 777-223(ER) plane (N772AN) clipped the wing tip of a Frontier Airlines Airbus A321-211 plane (N714FR) at Terminal E at Logan Airport in Boston, Massachusetts on 25 November.

No injuries were reported which occurred at a Terminal E gate while… pic.twitter.com/AYCvpILnsC

— FL360aero (@fl360aero) November 25, 2024

🚨#BREAKING: Emergency crews are on the scene after two planes clipped wingtips on the tarmac

📌#Boston | #Massachusetts

Emergency crews are currently on the scene at Logan Airport in Boston, Massachusetts, after two planes operated by American Airlines and Frontier Airlines… pic.twitter.com/JZPyMV1soe

— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) November 25, 2024

We need more women and black people working at the airport.

The competency crisis in the airline industry is a problem that only affirmative action can solve.

New York Post:

An already hectic holiday travel day was made more chaotic with two separate plane collisions on the tarmac at Boston Logan International Airport just hours apart on Monday.

In the first crash, an American Airlines jet that was taxiing to its gate clipped the wing of a parked Frontier Airlines plane, local ABC affiliate station WCVB reported.

“That was terrible. It was very scary. All of a sudden, ‘thump.’ It sounded like something fell from below,” Evelyn Pipione, a Frontier passenger, told the news station.

Video obtained by Storyful shows the battered wing of the smaller Frontier plane underneath the wing of the larger American aircraft.

“So, you can see the wing actually broke on the bottom, so the bigger plane — the wing is over, and then ours is cracked at the bottom,” Douglas Garcia, who took the footage, told WCVB.

…

Hours later, a JetBlue airplane that was being towed by a vehicle smacked into a Cape Air plane that had just landed at Logan from Nantucket and was waiting for a gate to open, the local station reported.

As demographics continue to get browner, and as women assume their correct role in charge of everything, we are going to see more and more exciting events at airports, like taxiing planes crashing into each other constantly, as well as serious air disasters of the kind you see in films, such as the films of Michael Bay.

Affirmative action not only helps women and the blacks, it helps all of us by making our lives so much more exciting.

Crane has collapsed in Hells Kitchen, New York.pic.twitter.com/OXvMT71Unr

— The Spectator Index (@spectatorindex) July 26, 2023

Whoops!

Reuters:

The top portion of a construction crane caught fire and crashed into a Manhattan street on Wednesday, injuring four civilians and two firefighters as debris rained down during the morning rush hour, authorities said.

Firefighters and rescue personnel arrived at the scene just as the crane fell, apparently responding to the blaze that had erupted in the cabin before the collapse.

The incident unfolded at about 7:30 a.m. in the area of 10th and 11th avenues and West 41 and 42 streets, near the Hudson Yards complex, the New York City Police Department said on the X social media platform, formerly known as Twitter.

The NYPD urged people to avoid the area, with the surrounding streets blocked and traffic through the nearby Lincoln Tunnel to New Jersey snarled.

Remember when neocon faggots used to constantly claim “oh, Chinese buildings fall down, haha!”

Well. China went through a period of extremely rapid development. The fastest development ever. So a couple buildings fell down, way back when. It was exaggerated maximally.

But they’re not falling down anymore.

China looks like a frigging Mars Colony in the year 2400.

Public Square, Kunshan City, Jiangsu Province, China pic.twitter.com/9bWn6Q5I2c

— Dragon kingdom.wu (@wwwYQ6661308579) July 25, 2023

China’s Magic City, Chongqing, a Rapidly Rising International Metropolis pic.twitter.com/3nokpSTyjQ

— Johannes Maria (@luo_yuehan) July 8, 2023

This isn’t a futuristic video game. This is the city of Shenzen in China.pic.twitter.com/AnhMTJAuz2

— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) July 21, 2023

China lives in sci-fi world

Chengdu city pic.twitter.com/RtnFvvuPYV

— Carl Zha (@CarlZha) July 24, 2023

America’s shit is all falling over.

This probably happened near the end of the Roman empire too

This is the Asian version of showing total discontent with society by lashing out.

It’s like when blacks join gangs and kill each other or when whites cut themselves.

Japan is a broken society that is failing young people.

The Guardian:

Could “sushi terrorism” forever change the way millions of diners in Japan eat their country’s signature dish?

The carefree days of hi-tech sushi dining – in which customers take plates directly from a conveyor belt – appear to be over, as restaurant chains scramble in response to a spate of hygiene incidents caused by badly behaved clientele.

In the weeks since a viral video appeared showing a teenager licking the open top of a communal soy sauce bottle and rubbing saliva on passing food at a kaitenzushi (conveyor belt sushi) restaurant, chains have scrambled to restore their reputation for cleanliness – even if it means removing their main attraction.

Eating sushi off of conveyor belts is one of the most iconic parts of Japanese culture, on par with samurai and tentacle rape

Choshimaru, which operates restaurants in the greater Tokyo area, recently said its conveyor belts would grind to a halt, forcing staff to deliver orders by hand, after a video showed a diner placing a cigarette butt in a container of pickled ginger.

In response, staff at the chain started taking condiments and utensils to tables every time a new group of diners took their seats.

But then Choshimaru went a step further and announced that, for the time being, conveyor belts at all 63 of its restaurants would be switched off, with customers forced to wait for staff to bring their orders directly to the table.

Footage of one of the terrorists

While the move has removed the fun element, the firm reasoned that the absence of dozens of plates making their way through the restaurant on a conveyor belt would make it practically impossible for pranksters to interfere with other customers’ orders.

The kaitenzushi industry, worth an estimated ¥740bn (£4.5bn/$5.4bn) in 2021, has been hit hard by the spate of viral videos showing, among other misdemeanours, customers licking communal sauce bottles, daubing wasabi on food as it passes by, spraying sushi with hand sanitiser and snatching plates of food destined for other tables.

The incidents have sent shares plummeting at Sushiro, the industry leader, and prompted operators to rethink how they serve their dishes.

Choshimaru said all of its conveyor belts would stop by late April, with some outlets expected to implement the new measure in the coming days, according to the SoraNews 24 website.

The company is not alone in going to extreme lengths to ensure that its sushi makes the journey from kitchen and table in perfect condition.

Sushiro said last month that its sushi would be delivered only via an “express lane” to customers who order via touch-screen devices, making it harder for other diners to tamper with food.

The change came after Sushiro suffered a slump in customers, as more people shunned the convenience and novelty of kaitenzushi amid widespread media coverage of “terrorism” targeting items of food.

The end of hi-tech dining prompted a wave of online commentary, with one user posing the obvious question: “If a revolving sushi restaurant’s sushi doesn’t revolve, isn’t it just a regular sushi restaurant?”

The Kura Sushi chain said last week it would soon introduce cameras equipped with AI to monitor tables at its restaurants in an attempt to deter mischievous diners. The system can reportedly detect “unusual” behaviour by customers, such as removing a plate from the conveyor belt and quickly returning it.

“Our company has been hearing from a large number of customers who tell us they no longer trust or want to go to conveyor belt sushi restaurants,” Kura Sushi’s head of public relations, Hiroyuki Okamoto, told reporters, according to the Mainichi Shimbun.

“This is a crisis not only for our stores, but for the entire conveyor belt sushi industry,” Okamoto said, adding that the use of AI would reassure diners even though it meant they were effectively being placed under surveillance.

The contagion has spread to other parts of Japan’s budget restaurant sector. Gyoza no Osho, a popular chain of Chinese restaurants, has removed soy sauce and other condiments from tables – they are still available on request from staff – while the ramen chain Ichiran has removed glasses from its counters and tables.

The interesting thing about Japan is that they do not have the Jews.

They have Jews by proxy, because since they lost World War II they’ve been a US vassal state, effectively under occuption. But they do not have the Jewish agenda, in terms of feminism, homosexualism, mass immigration, and so on.

Most of the terrorists appear to be either ugly women or effeminate men. It’s kinda hard to tell, because they all look the same.

Certainly, a proud nation like Japan being forced to submit to a foreign power is humiliating, and that is going to have an effect, but it is not enough to cause the kind of social decay we see in the country.

The basic reality situation appears to be that urbanization in itself, with crowding and the modern work schedule, causes decay. It’s something we need to figure out at some point.

Ye has made some interesting statements about wanting to build permaculture cities that are futuristic but also localized and self-sufficient. These are the kinds of things we would be talking about if we did not have these Jews on our backs flooding us with third world refuse, invading the whole world in the name of anus, and turning our kids into faggots.

Nothing that elites ever do could be bad, because there isn’t any conspiracies, so everything they always do is good, no matter what.

After all, these are the same people fighting for trans children and Ukraine Democracy. They are willing to freeze to death for to death for the Ukraine. They will cut their sons’ dicks off. Well, they won’t do it, I mean, you will be doing it, but they’re the ones who make the choice.

Douglas Rushkoff, that Jew who writes about the sociology of a technocratic society of which you are probably aware of, writes for The Guardian:

As a humanist who writes about the impact of digital technology on our lives, I am often mistaken for a futurist. The people most interested in hiring me for my opinions about technology are usually less concerned with building tools that help people live better lives in the present than they are in identifying the Next Big Thing through which to dominate them in the future. I don’t usually respond to their inquiries. Why help these guys ruin what’s left of the internet, much less civilisation?

Still, sometimes a combination of morbid curiosity and cold hard cash is enough to get me on a stage in front of the tech elite, where I try to talk some sense into them about how their businesses are affecting our lives out here in the real world. That’s how I found myself accepting an invitation to address a group mysteriously described as “ultra-wealthy stakeholders”, out in the middle of the desert.

A limo was waiting for me at the airport. As the sun began to dip over the horizon, I realised I had been in the car for three hours. What sort of wealthy hedge-fund types would drive this far from the airport for a conference? Then I saw it. On a parallel path next to the highway, as if racing against us, a small jet was coming in for a landing on a private airfield. Of course.

The next morning, two men in matching Patagonia fleeces came for me in a golf cart and conveyed me through rocks and underbrush to a meeting hall. They left me to drink coffee and prepare in what I figured was serving as my green room. But instead of me being wired with a microphone or taken to a stage, my audience was brought in to me. They sat around the table and introduced themselves: five super-wealthy guys – yes, all men – from the upper echelon of the tech investing and hedge-fund world. At least two of them were billionaires. After a bit of small talk, I realised they had no interest in the speech I had prepared about the future of technology. They had come to ask questions.

They started out innocuously and predictably enough. Bitcoin or ethereum? Virtual reality or augmented reality? Who will get quantum computing first, China or Google? Eventually, they edged into their real topic of concern: New Zealand or Alaska? Which region would be less affected by the coming climate crisis? It only got worse from there. Which was the greater threat: global warming or biological warfare? How long should one plan to be able to survive with no outside help? Should a shelter have its own air supply? What was the likelihood of groundwater contamination? Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system, and asked: “How do I maintain authority over my security force after the event?” The event. That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, solar storm, unstoppable virus, or malicious computer hack that takes everything down.

It’s funny how Jews use “climate crisis” as a euphemism for “societal collapse.”

It’s a crisis of the social climate, mayhaps.

Jews are such rats.

This single question occupied us for the rest of the hour. They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from raiders as well as angry mobs. One had already secured a dozen Navy Seals to make their way to his compound if he gave them the right cue. But how would he pay the guards once even his crypto was worthless? What would stop the guards from eventually choosing their own leader?

The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew. Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for their survival. Or maybe building robots to serve as guards and workers – if that technology could be developed “in time”.

I tried to reason with them. I made pro-social arguments for partnership and solidarity as the best approaches to our collective, long-term challenges. The way to get your guards to exhibit loyalty in the future was to treat them like friends right now, I explained. Don’t just invest in ammo and electric fences, invest in people and relationships. They rolled their eyes at what must have sounded to them like hippy philosophy.

This was probably the wealthiest, most powerful group I had ever encountered. Yet here they were, asking a Marxist media theorist for advice on where and how to configure their doomsday bunkers. That’s when it hit me: at least as far as these gentlemen were concerned, this was a talk about the future of technology.

Taking their cue from Tesla founder Elon Musk colonising Mars, Palantir’s Peter Thiel reversing the ageing process, or artificial intelligence developers Sam Altman and Ray Kurzweil uploading their minds into supercomputers, they were preparing for a digital future that had less to do with making the world a better place than it did with transcending the human condition altogether. Their extreme wealth and privilege served only to make them obsessed with insulating themselves from the very real and present danger of climate change, rising sea levels, mass migrations, global pandemics, nativist panic and resource depletion. For them, the future of technology is about only one thing: escape from the rest of us.

These people once showered the world with madly optimistic business plans for how technology might benefit human society. Now they’ve reduced technological progress to a video game that one of them wins by finding the escape hatch. Will it be Jeff Bezos migrating to space, Thiel to his New Zealand compound, or Mark Zuckerberg to his virtual metaverse? And these catastrophising billionaires are the presumptive winners of the digital economy – the supposed champions of the survival-of-the-fittest business landscape that’s fuelling most of this speculation to begin with.

What I came to realise was that these men are actually the losers. The billionaires who called me out to the desert to evaluate their bunker strategies are not the victors of the economic game so much as the victims of its perversely limited rules. More than anything, they have succumbed to a mindset where “winning” means earning enough money to insulate themselves from the damage they are creating by earning money in that way. It’s as if they want to build a car that goes fast enough to escape from its own exhaust.

Yet this Silicon Valley escapism – let’s call it The Mindset – encourages its adherents to believe that the winners can somehow leave the rest of us behind.

Never before have our society’s most powerful players assumed that the primary impact of their own conquests would be to render the world itself unliveable for everyone else. Nor have they ever before had the technologies through which to programme their sensibilities into the very fabric of our society. The landscape is alive with algorithms and intelligences actively encouraging these selfish and isolationist outlooks. Those sociopathic enough to embrace them are rewarded with cash and control over the rest of us. It’s a self-reinforcing feedback loop. This is new.

Amplified by digital technologies and the unprecedented wealth disparity they afford, The Mindset allows for the easy externalisation of harm to others, and inspires a corresponding longing for transcendence and separation from the people and places that have been abused.

Instead of just lording over us for ever, however, the billionaires at the top of these virtual pyramids actively seek the endgame. In fact, like the plot of a Marvel blockbuster, the very structure of The Mindset requires an endgame. Everything must resolve to a one or a zero, a winner or loser, the saved or the damned. Actual, imminent catastrophes from the climate emergency to mass migrations support the mythology, offering these would-be superheroes the opportunity to play out the finale in their own lifetimes. For The Mindset also includes a faith-based Silicon Valley certainty that they can develop a technology that will somehow break the laws of physics, economics and morality to offer them something even better than a way of saving the world: a means of escape from the apocalypse of their own making.

…

Many of those seriously seeking a safe haven simply hire one of several prepper construction companies to bury a prefab steel-lined bunker somewhere on one of their existing properties. Rising S Company in Texas builds and installs bunkers and tornado shelters for as little as $40,000 for an 8ft by 12ft emergency hideout all the way up to the $8.3m luxury series “Aristocrat”, complete with pool and bowling lane. The enterprise originally catered to families seeking temporary storm shelters, before it went into the long-term apocalypse business. The company logo, complete with three crucifixes, suggests their services are geared more toward Christian evangelist preppers in red-state America than billionaire tech bros playing out sci-fi scenarios.

There’s something much more whimsical about the facilities in which most of the billionaires – or, more accurately, aspiring billionaires – actually invest. A company called Vivos is selling luxury underground apartments in converted cold war munitions storage facilities, missile silos, and other fortified locations around the world. Like miniature Club Med resorts, they offer private suites for individuals or families, and larger common areas with pools, games, movies and dining. Ultra-elite shelters such as the Oppidum in the Czech Republic claim to cater to the billionaire class, and pay more attention to the long-term psychological health of residents. They provide imitation of natural light, such as a pool with a simulated sunlit garden area, a wine vault, and other amenities to make the wealthy feel at home.

On closer analysis, however, the probability of a fortified bunker actually protecting its occupants from the reality of, well, reality, is very slim. For one, the closed ecosystems of underground facilities are preposterously brittle. For example, an indoor, sealed hydroponic garden is vulnerable to contamination. Vertical farms with moisture sensors and computer-controlled irrigation systems look great in business plans and on the rooftops of Bay Area startups; when a palette of topsoil or a row of crops goes wrong, it can simply be pulled and replaced. The hermetically sealed apocalypse “grow room” doesn’t allow for such do-overs.

Just the known unknowns are enough to dash any reasonable hope of survival. But this doesn’t seem to stop wealthy preppers from trying. The New York Times reported that real estate agents specialising in private islands were overwhelmed with inquiries during the Covid-19 pandemic. Prospective clients were even asking about whether there was enough land to do some agriculture in addition to installing a helicopter landing pad. But while a private island may be a good place to wait out a temporary plague, turning it into a self-sufficient, defensible ocean fortress is harder than it sounds. Small islands are utterly dependent on air and sea deliveries for basic staples. Solar panels and water filtration equipment need to be replaced and serviced at regular intervals. The billionaires who reside in such locales are more, not less, dependent on complex supply chains than those of us embedded in industrial civilisation.

Surely the billionaires who brought me out for advice on their exit strategies were aware of these limitations. Could it have all been some sort of game? Five men sitting around a poker table, each wagering his escape plan was best?

But if they were in it just for fun, they wouldn’t have called for me. They would have flown out the author of a zombie apocalypse comic book. If they wanted to test their bunker plans, they’d have hired a security expert from Blackwater or the Pentagon. They seemed to want something more. Their language went far beyond questions of disaster preparedness and verged on politics and philosophy: words such as individuality, sovereignty, governance and autonomy.

That’s because it wasn’t their actual bunker strategies I had been brought out to evaluate so much as the philosophy and mathematics they were using to justify their commitment to escape. They were working out what I’ve come to call the insulation equation: could they earn enough money to insulate themselves from the reality they were creating by earning money in this way? Was there any valid justification for striving to be so successful that they could simply leave the rest of us behind –apocalypse or not?

Or was this really their intention all along? Maybe the apocalypse is less something they’re trying to escape than an excuse to realise The Mindset’s true goal: to rise above mere mortals and execute the ultimate exit strategy.

So, look: you should be aware of what these Jews are saying.

And you should be aware that they’re not just saying it at the World Economic Forum – they’re just publishing it in the Guardian.

Of course, the WEF is not secretive anymore – they post all of their panels on their YouTube channel, and post all their white papers on their official website.

But publishing in the Guardian means they want the goyim to know – I guess?

There’s no other obvious reason.

Saying it’s about global warming – those rascals. It’s just almost too much.

Look around you: everything is falling apart.

It’s all coming undone.

Our civilization was built over hundreds of years, and in a day it will fall.

This is what happens when white men hand over what they’ve built to women, Jews and brown people.

POLITICO:

The exact root of California’s rolling blackouts is still unclear as more power outages loom, and that’s allowed everyone to point fingers.

Energy experts Monday cited a litany of potential causes for the rotating outages that affected hundreds of thousands of California residents Friday and Saturday nights: ballooning demand, inadequate transmission, an overreliance on renewable energy and the incursion of new energy providers that don’t have the same obligation to maintain reserves as traditional utilities do.

Oh yeah, sure – nothing relating to the complete collapse of the rest of society.

It’s an isolated, unrelated incident.

Just like the revolution in Belarus is completely isolated and unrelated to the revolutions in Hong Kong, Lebanon and Thailand.

It’s all just a big coincidence.

Totally unconnected, disparate happenings.

While California braced for another round of rolling blackouts Monday night, the state’s grid operator held off for a second straight night, citing cooler than expected weather and widespread conservation. It also came as Gov. Gavin Newsom questioned all of the state’s electricity players about why the outages occurred and faced blowback from frustrated residents.

California has endured planned blackouts in recent years as a wildfire prevention measure. But it was the Golden State’s first round of rolling blackouts related to supply since 2001, when Enron and other energy traders manipulated California’s market.

Earlier Monday, the California Independent System Operator blamed Friday’s outages on “high heat and increased electricity demand.” Yet some energy experts noted that demand wasn’t particularly higher than normal, as is typical for weekends, and CAISO had predicted it would have adequate reserves on hand for the 80 percent of California’s grid that it manages.

…

“Hot weather and a cloudy day should not be able to shut down the fifth-largest economy in the world,” Lance Hastings, president of the California Manufacturers and Technology Association, said in a statement. “While we support California’s renewable energy goals, we absolutely need system redundancy that allows us to continue to operate and manufacture products for our residents and the world.”

It’s over, Lance.

America is being collapsed on purpose, and there is no actual bottom in sight.

No one really knows how bad this can get.

It’s going to be like that Leonard Cohen song, “The Future.”

We should probably pay attention to that song. He wrote it in 1992 and he probably would have been in a place to know something about what was then the future. He was a high IQ, emotionally confounded Jewish pervert who spent his entire life traveling the world and entertaining the elite with his cute little riddles.

I’ve listened to the albums quite a bit, and these lyrics are popping in my head quite a bit lately. Haunting me, as an actual matter of fact.

Rolling blackouts are something else that you’re going to have to enjoy in this new glorious future we are marching into. This is another reason to get out of the city. Get somewhere where you can heat your home with wood. Get somewhere where you’re not stricken with fear if the lights go out.