On time in Thailand, however many years ago, I was listening to a young lady complain about Chinese people. I had some sympathy to her complaints, as Chinese tourists can be overbearing. On the whole, they spend so much money, it is hardly fair to complain. And the thing about this is: China developed so rapidly that the average 30 year old has parents who grew up in a rice field. So they have a rural mindset, which is different than the more refined culture of Thailand, which prioritizes politeness and a complex system of social decorum. Americans and the British can also be slightly barbaric in the eyes of Thais or other Indochinese peoples, but the whites can sort of get a hold of the concept of Asian decorum, specifically because they are racially different. A Chinese person looking at a Thai sees someone genetically similar to them (Thailand was colonized by Southern Chinese), and feels as though they are in rural China when they are in Thailand.

The Thais complain about Chinese talking too loudly, spitting indoors, and flicking cigarette butts in inappropriate places. It is all just rural behavior. Obviously, everyone loves the Singaporese, who are some of the nicest and most refined people in the world (if not the single most polite and culturally aware), and Singaporese are Han Chinese. Further, you will find Singaporese type culturization in central Shanghai, Hong Kong, Taipei, and other Han metros where people have lived a cultured urban life for generations. So it is definitely not a ethnic issue or even a general ethnic cultural issue, but specifically a rural issue, with people who have not been fully acclimatized to urban Asian social norms having the money to travel to Thailand for vacation.

I am a sinophile, and attempted to explain this to the lass with some degree of success. I further added that most Asian groups hate each other, but they should try to find positives in Chinese culture and be friendly with them, because they are bringing in money that is really helping Thai development.

So bristled at the word “hate,” saying “I don’t hate anyone, I just find some of the behaviors rude and wish they would try to understand our culture more when they are here.”

Referencing an early discussion, I replied: “well, you said you hate Indians.”

And she said: “And Pakistan. I hate them all and think a big bomb should destroy all of them. You said we were talking about Asians. I don’t hate any Asians, we are all similar, but I hate all India and Pakistan and think they all should die.”

This is not a minority view in Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, or Indonesia. It is most extreme in Burma, where they border Bangladesh and have had ongoing conflict with them for decades. This doesn’t have much to do with tourism or overseas work, given that subcontinental peoples don’t do much of that in Southeast Asia. It is much more influenced by the fact that you’d be very hard-pressed to find a single individual in one of these countries who does not know someone who has been scammed by an Indian.

It would also be hard to find an American who has not been targeted with a scam from India, but aside from the elderly, most Westerners come from a society that is much lower trust, and is therefore much more guarded against scams. But we all hear the horror stories of elderly people having their identity stolen and their bank account cleaned out, or teenagers who commit suicide because a “woman” with an attractive profile picture asked them to masturbate on camera for them and then threatened to spread it to their parents and all their classmates if they didn’t pay up.

One in five elderly people in America have been scammed, adding up to nearly $40 billion per year in profits for the scammers who are virtually all Indian.

The “sextortion” of teen boys is harder to track, because for the same reason boys don’t want the videos released, they don’t want to admit they got scammed like this. (Note: sextortion victims also include some girls, though a much lower percentage, probably both because girls are slightly more discerning about who they send nudes to, and less bothered by the prospect of them leaking.)

Americans are so sensitive to “racism” accusations, that we can’t even talk about the fact that the overwhelming majority of these scams come from India. Of course, the media decides what “racism” is and who you’re allowed to be racist towards, and interestingly, the media does not hesitate to point to ethnic Chinese as being the largest group involved in corporate espionage.

Silicon Valley is involved in aggressive screening not just of Chinese nationals, but ethnic Chinese born in America or a third country. This was endorsed by the State Department, officially, though after several lawsuits, it is currently a bit less official. Official or not, if you are visibly Chinese, it is virtually impossible to get hired on as a new hire in Silicon Valley in current year (even other East Asians with poor relations to the Chinese get profiled because of their physical features).

In 2023, then FBI overlord Christopher Wray held a meeting with his “Five Eyes” satraps to warn of the Chinese tech threat, and effectively instructed tech companies and universities not to hire Chinese people. In so many words.

I don’t know about you, but my grandma being scammed out of her social security by Indians bothers me a lot more than Sam Altman getting his AI algorithm (which was promised to be open source in the first place) borrowed by the Chinese. Part of the issue here is that the government cares a lot more about global tech dominance than they do your grandma or your horny teenage son, but it is also an issue of geopolitics, where China is viewed as an enemy and India is not.

While spying is definitely more important to the government than grandma’s retirement money, the US is only bothered by certain spies. While India probably doesn’t do spying or industrial espionage on any scale, simply because their domestic tech industry is not advanced enough for it to be relevant to them, Israelis steal technology and spy on Americans with impunity, and there are never any meetings about it, let alone calls for companies dealing with sensitive technologies to stop hiring Jews. However, twenty years ago, when the Holocaust was not so fresh in everyone’s minds, Israel did make it into an FBI report on industrial, which stated: “Israel has an active program to gather proprietary information within the United States. These collection activities are primarily directed at obtaining information on military systems and advanced computing applications that can be used in Israel’s sizable armaments industry.” But I mean, in 2019, Jews were caught setting up spying devices outside of the White House, and it was a considered by the US “intelligence community” to be a non-issue. There was no summoning of the ambassador. What makes the situation even more outrageous is that the Israeli companies involved in theft of US technology have been caught selling some of it to China (this is despite the fact that China may well in turn sell the tech to Iran). But this is allowed, because of the Holocaust. (Please see “Schindler’s List” for more information on why Jews are permitted to operate with impunity inside of the United States).

India was a “Bulwark Against China”

China is definitely on the enemies list, just like the Russians. And while their status is nowhere near the total impunity of the Jews, India has had a privileged status for decades due to claims that they are a “bulwark against China.”

It is worth noting here that there is a pretty large misconception about the history of India and China. Many people believe, for whatever various reasons, that Chinese-Indian conflict is some kind of ancient norm, similar to the hostility between China and Japan. However, there is no truth to this. In fact, going back more than 2,000 years, there had been intense cultural, religious, and economic cooperation between China and India. India played a key role in moving Chinese products to the Middle East and Europe. (In trying to get a grasp on this issue recently, I found “Buddhism, Diplomacy, and Trade: The Realignment of India–China Relations, 600–1400” by Tansen Sen very helpful, though for those uninterested in books, perusing Wikipedia can get you up to speed.)

So then, you might be thinking that there was some fallout during the colonial period, or during the communist revolution in China. You would, in fact, be incorrect. Relations between India and China, which were peaceful for thousands of years, did not deteriorate until 1959, when India made the decision to harbor the satanic cult leader, slaver, cannibal, and terrorist “Dalai Lama.” Due to the extreme vulgarity of harboring such an unbelievable fiend, tensions soured drastically. This led to border conflicts in territories that were never considered contested before, and to the the first ever military conflict between the two states in 1962.

It’s unclear why India made the decision to harbor this terrorist. I would personally assume that it was due to back-channeling with the US, though to be clear, this is a personal “hunch,” as I have never found record of this. The US did funnel him and his satanic cannibal bandits a bunch of money.

To be clear, “Dalai Lama” is no more a “Buddhist” than a “Christian Zionist” is a “Christian.” Tibetan Buddhism, like Christian Zionism, is a satanic cult. Late 19th and early 20th century European occultists went to Tibet and integrated information gathered into their mystical, satanic systems. Even Aliester Crowley was obsessed with Tibet. That is a story for another time, but the evils of the Tibetans were well-documented long before the Chinese revolution, and are definitely not “Chinese communist” propaganda. (Keyu Jin, who is the sexy author of The New China Playbook: Beyond Socialism and Capitalism, a book trying to explain China to Westerners, says when Americans think of China they think of “the 3 Ts – Tibet, Taiwan, and Tiananmen, all of which were hoaxes. And yes, I am showing off the fact that not working on the site for 10 hours a day has given me time to read a lot of books.) Dalai Lama’s failed uprising was against Beijing’s demands they end slavery. This is to say a “humanitarian” reason to harbor him is nonsensical. Regardless of the thinking behind the decision to harbor this fiend, it caused a spiraling of relations between India and China that were then rolled up into Cold War politics.

The end of India’s 3,000 years of friendly relations with China was their beginning of their friendly relations with the US. Relations between the US and China softened in in the 1970s, the start of which was actually a ping-pong championship, but the most iconic symbol of the softening was Richard Nixon’s 1972 visit, where he met with Chairman Mao.

Mao died four years later, and Deng Xiaoping eventually took over, leading to decades of cooperation, given that neither got along particularly well with the USSR.

However, this cooperation was haunted by the paranoia of the United States, which insisted on maintaining control of Taiwan, despite the fact that they signed the “one china” agreement, recognizing that the PRC is the only government of China, which includes Taiwan. They also continued to thwart relations between China and India throughout this period, putting conditions on “development assistance” foreign aid, for example, and of course spreading anti-China propaganda throughout the Indian media.

Most of the American “top thinkers” such as Zbigniew Brzezinski, believed that China was going to become a liberal democracy as they got more wealthy. The idea, especially after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the disintegration of the USSR, with all of that “end of history” nonsense, was that wealthier nations naturally adopt social liberalism and that social liberalism is incompatible with any political system other than liberal democracy. As late as 1998, Zbig claimed that “within a decade” the CCP would no longer be the sole governing body of China.

Meanwhile, Samuel Huntington, a Harvard professor who served in the Carter Administration alongside Zbig and author of “The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order,” argued that some traditional cultures could maintain social conservatism and therefore political conservatism even after technological development and economic liberalization. He listed China as one such civilization. He certainly won that debate, as by the time Obama took office (elected the same year Zbig predicted China would be embracing democracy), the US had accepted that China would not spontaneous become a democracy and developed a “Pivot to Asia” strategy to use military force to turn China into a liberal democracy.

Part of the plan there was to lean heavily into the relationship with India, along with Philippines, Japan, and “South Korea,” because they needed as many bulwarks as possible against their former bulwark against the USSR. (US foreign policy is heavily bulwark-oriented, which in simple terms means that they constantly play countries against one another to prevent any alliances that could challenge their hegemony.) Many prominent academics, including John Mearshiemer, were calling for Russia to be a bulwark against China, but the US has always hated Russia. During his 2012 election against Mitt Romney, Obama chastised the nasty old magic under-wearing coot over Romney’s antagonism toward Russia. You may remember he said “the 1980s called and they want their foreign policy back.” (Obama was always very tapped into youth culture, you see.) Two years later, Obama’s State Department was running a coup in the Ukraine. (Although to be fair, during his “exit interview” with Jewish terrorist and Atlantic Monthly editor Jeffrey Goldberg, Obama said he didn’t support further escalation with Russia over the Ukraine. Also, to be fair, Goldberg is my favorite Jewish terrorist because he put me on the cover of his magazine and I looked really cool. Also to be clear, he is literally a Jewish terrorist who in his 20s went to Israel to work in a concentration camp and torture hostages.)

India, with a massive population and an economy advanced enough to absorb much of the manufacturing previously done in China, was a key “bulwark” in this current landscape of hostility towards China.

But then Lindsey Graham told Trump he had to be a big tough macho man and stand up against Vladimir Putin for some reason no one has ever bothered to explain, and Trump hit India with a 50% tariff because they refused to stop buying Russian oil.

Obviously, this isn’t a permanent thing. Even if India maintains it’s refusal to take overs regarding their energy policy from Donald Trump and his pal Lindsey, they are not going to maintain a 50% tariff. However, this has completely soured India on the US, rousing up ultranationalist sentiment. Even if the tariffs are lifted tomorrow, the damage done to the US-India relationship will be permanent.

I watch the Indian news. Firstly, it is in English for whatever reason. Secondly, the talk shows are totally insane. There are no guardrails. It is like Piers Morgan’s YouTube show, but even wilder. They will entertain any and all ideas. They will sometimes bring on Pakistanis and have better shouting matches than anything I’ve ever seen on Piers’ show. Further, I enjoy masturbating to some of the hosts.

Based on 100% of the news I’ve seen, India is now completely united against America. Severely. These people are really, really mad. They are saying “we’ve done everything you wanted us to do for decades, how are you going to do us like this?” It is being viewed, universally, as an attack on Indian sovereignty, and unlike white people, Indians still have a sense of pride and dignity and take very severe offense to being bullied in this way. What they are hearing from Donald Trump is “we decide who you do business with.” Given that the colonial history is such a huge part of the national mythology, it seems like some advisor should have understood that the response to this would be extreme.

I don’t think India is going to become an enemy state tomorrow, but this weird thing Trump did will be remembered for decades to come, and it is already causing the country to move toward China, as we saw this week.

“Tariffs” are Just a New Form of Sanctions

The US had encouraged India to engage in border skirmishes with China, and in 2020 there was a particularly deadly one. Because of this, and the fallout from it, India’s recent relations with China were especially cold, which is exactly what the US wanted. However, Indian Prime Minister Modi is now in China for the first time in seven years. And it is not just any trip, but a trip to meet with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), a security partnership that Russia and China envision as a counterbalance to NATO.

India has been a member of the SCO since 2017, but has also maintained military cooperation with the US, which was one of the biggest hurdles preventing the organization from forming a cohesive bloc to resist NATO. Although the mutual defense pact – “an attack on one is an attack on all” – that NATO members agree to is unprecedented, explicitly a relic of the Cold War, and not something the SCO would likely ever commit to, it is possible that agreements could be made to exclusively cooperate militarily with each other, which would mean India ending their cooperation with the US military.

Joe Biden’s administration was seen as completely out of control, with its totally unprecedented actions against Russia, removing them from the global banking system over an insignificant border skirmish, along with their provocations and threats against China, all culminating in their unconditional support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza, which threatens to throw the entire region into a very big war. Countries were waiting to see if Trump would restore some kind of sanity, as he was claiming he would, and instead he maxed everything out, making it even more extreme than it was under Biden.

The Russia sanctions showed that the US could not be trusted to maintain the global financial system, because if they decide they don’t like you, they can just kick you out of international trade. They will steal your dollar reserves. They will attempt to bankrupt your economy, they will engage in piracy, expropriating private property from your citizens without any sort of process. This is a lot more threatening than the prospect of war. If Trump would have came in on day one and simply let Russia back into SWIFT, he could have kept the war going and it would have blunted most of the damage. But instead he is doing “secondary sanctions” through this “tariff” thing.

It’s now clear that the tariffs do not relate to attempting to reshore US manufacturing. That is just a ruse. It is a stupid ruse as well, because the idea that you can just “move” factories as you would move a shipping container and then somehow train-up a staff is completely absurd.

Note: During Trump 1, when he first started tariffing China ostensibly under the same premise as these current tariffs, China began moving their factories to Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, etc. They brought their own teams to build the buildings, and then their own people to train up the local staff. In some situations, they didn’t even bother to train local staff, and just moved the Chinese factory workers to the new factory is the less tariffed country.

“Reshoring” is a pipe dream. It is so much more expensive to manufacture in America. Some of that is wages, but with wages having risen in China and elsewhere while US wages have fallen, it has much more to do with the insane regulatory environment in America that is so anti-business. Surely, if the tariffs are high enough, it is still cheaper to move to America, but who is going to do that when Trump won’t even stick to his own policies for more than a few days or weeks, and even if Trump did set a hard policy, we live in a democracy where there is no political stability and the next guy could and probably will just remove all these tariffs.

The tariffs are usually framed by critics as a tax on Americans. Objectively, they are a tax on Americans, even though they also harm foreign exporters. But I think the real revelation here, made very obvious in the India situation, is that these tariffs are a new type of sanctions. Lindsey Graham was calling for “secondary sanctions” on India for buying Russian oil, and Trump did the “tariffs” for that express purpose. And he is lobbing these tariffs around everywhere. He’s tariffing Venezuela explicitly to try to pressure them into making Bolsonaro President again. Whatever you think of the Ukraine or Venezuela or whatever else, this is extreme international belligerence, and it shows the world that the US is not a safe guarantor of the global order. Entrusting the US to maintain the global financial or security architecture is like sending your kids to a daycare center that is also a crack house.

Americans might think Trump is better than Biden because he cracked down on trannies and you can say “gay” and “retard” again. But to the rest of the world, Trump 2 is “Biden on Steroids,” and the US is a sinking ship. People are fleeing, trying to grab ahold of anything.

Modi’s India Can’t Work as a Liberal Democracy

Despite having called for a genocide of the entire Indian race as a result of their scamming and generally abhorrent behaviors, I’ve always liked Modi. He is an anti-liberal ethnoreligious nationalist. His project is incompatible with democracy. Most pressingly, he is dealing with an existential demographic issue many decades after the partition of India, which was supposed to solve the problem of multiculturalism by giving Moslems their own country (which later became two countries when East Pakistan became Bangladesh). There are still Moslems in India, and they have a lot more kids than Hindus. India is supposedly only 15% Moslem right now, but no one knows the demographics of India. In a few decades, the Moslems will start wielding real political power, and in the longer run, there cannot be a democratic Hindu India for the same reason Israel says there can’t be a Jewish democracy if they gave Palestinians citizenship. (This is why everyone talks about a mythical “two-state solution” instead of just doing the obvious thing and giving Palestinians equal rights. Jews will always talk about a “two-state solution.” That’s why there are so many Jews in pro-Palestine activism. The obvious thing is a one state solution where you just give the Palestinians citizenship.) If India were not a democracy, an Islamic minority would not be so much of a threat. The Hindus wouldn’t have to kill them all, but they would not face the threat of Moslems gaining political power and ultimately taking over the country.

Please note that I am not saying Islam is bad or Hinduism is good or anything else, I am simply describing the situation, and also noting that I respect any leader who is willing to stick up for their own people. I like Modi because he is the kind of leader that every nation should have.

What’s more, unlike many populists, Modi’s support base is the urban middle class, the wealthy, and the industrialists. In the 2024 election, when he lost a significant amount of power in the democracy system, it was in part due to Moslems coming together (which they hadn’t effectively done before), but was in larger part due to poor, rural people disliking him because of something to do with farming problems.

The only reason India is a democracy in the first place is that the West demanded it. No one really wants democracy, other than screeching women who want to have slut freedoms, homosexuals, and various minority groups. Democracy is not a natural system. You see this with the Trump movement, where the MAGA support base has no interest at all in democratic processes and just basically wants Trump to be a king. Further, Putin got 88% of the vote in the last election. If Xi were to hold a vote, he would get more than that. Democracy is an unnatural system, it is the most corrupt system, and it is the most tyrannical. No one wants it and they only do it because the US forces it on them. The US wants democracies because they can manipulate and control them through institutions. They have that down to a science.

This is a big reason for Modi to split from the US. If he does, he will no longer have to do this democracy charade. That doesn’t mean he has to abolish parliament or whatever, he just moves into a system that maintains some of the trappings of democracy, but opposition parties are sidelined and safely ignored.

The Trump attack on India via these “tariff” sanctions is giving Modi the support and the excuse to move away from the West and move away from the democracy system. His ability to do that will be based on his ability to form a relationship with China, and so far, that seems to be going very well.

The SCO meeting was more symbolic than anything else. But it’s a big symbol. And it certainly implies that this is going to be moving forward.

Trump is going around whining about how he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize even as he continues to arm the Ukraine and commits the single most brutal genocide in all of human history in Gaza. (The Holocaust is a hoax, but even if it was real, at least it was a secret. Imagine if Nazi camp guards had been posting TikTok videos of them steaming millions of Jews in homicidal steam chambers. And then there was some other country paying for the whole thing and saying it was good.) But frankly, the way Trump has united Russia, China, and India in this new alliance is probably worth giving him a Nobel Peace Prize. I’m serious. He should try applying on that basis, and I don’t really know how it could be denied to him.

The SCO meeting was also attended by Lula, president of Brazil, who is also a victim of Trump’s “tariff” sanctions. Iran’s president was there. As was the Prime Minister of Cambodia, whose country was a victim of a ridiculous assault by the US ally Thailand last month. Mongolia’s president was there (the US has been trying to sway Mongolia to their side, despite the fact it would make no sense). The leaders of every Central and Southeast Asian country, with the exceptions of Thailand and the Philippines, were in attendance.

The SCO is a kind of sister organization to BRICS. What exactly the official functions of these organizations technically are is sort of irrelevant at this point. The point is, they represent the coming together of all of the nations being targeted as enemies by the United States. Please note that I hate the term “global south,” and would ask you to kindly not use that term. The correct term is “Russia, China, and the third world” (Russia and China are second world countries, the rest of these are all third world countries. Those terms are not offensive, and what is actually offensive is changing terminology. Referring to the third world as “global south” is no better than referring to niggers as “the negro peoples.”)

What we are seeing with Trump is an extreme escalation of the US agenda to build an Iron Curtain around itself by forcing every country not directly under the control of the US into an alliance explicitly based on not being friends with the US, because the US is a bully country that tries to control everyone’s life.

International liberal democracy thinks it’s Jesus. After all, if everyone has “human rights” (protip: they do not), then every country must accept the perfected universalist system of liberal democracy. It is an evangelical system. This has become like communism. Well, like early communism. “Everyone deserves human rights” is just a different version of “workers of the world, unite!” What China, as the head of this new world order, is saying is that it’s nobody’s business but your own how you want to run your internal affairs. What China is saying is that communists, dictators, theocrats, and yes, even democrats (assuming they are not the liberal Western sort) can all get along and make money together instead of having wars. It is universally appealing and the only reason anyone would not want in is that the US is threatening or bribing them.

No traditional country that is too big to bribe wants to be on-board with the Americans’ gay/feminist/interracial agenda. Access to the US financial infrastructure is a kind of bribe, in that it is coercive. But the world is now seeing that regardless of the money they might be able to make, it is simply not worth it to be under the boot of Creepy Uncle Sam. Further, the way the country is going off the rails, it’s unlikely there is going to be too much money to make with the US in the 21st century. Along with all of his other problems, Trump has no ability to escape Israel’s demand for a war with Iran, and that is really going to damage the country’s financial and military standing.

Further, Modi, like every other leader in the world, knows that at any time the US could do him like they did Russia, and cut India out of their international financial cartel. It is just common sense to preempt that by being prepared. For every country, security is the first and foremost concern, and China can provide security guarantees without the bullying.

What This Means for You

If this plays out the way it looks like it’s going to play out, it is definitely going to mean fewer H-1B visas, I can tell you that. Indians will be less excited to come to a country they view as an enemy nation, and the US will be less likely to let them in if they start classifying them like they classify the Chinese. India’s tech sector is not a complete joke, they are developing, and they could develop faster if they were cooperating with the Chinese, so those people who come on H-1Bs could just stay in their own country and work at their own companies.

Further, India, the most populous country in the world and the “bulwark against China” that the US has poured so much money and energy into developing switches to the Chinese side, it is a massive hit to the American Empire, and the weakening of the American empire is good for everyone on earth, first and foremost Americans themselves. Well, maybe first and foremost for the Europeans, who are crushed under the heel of the Americans and don’t even get the financial benefits Americans get from the empire, but at least second and secondmost, the Americans benefit from an end of the empire.

As far as what America’s plan is here: I have no idea. This makes zero sense. There is no level on which it makes sense, other than that Trump is senile, and really likes golfing with Lindsey Graham.

It is wild that he had that meeting with Putin and said he was setting everything up to end the war then did the most extreme possible thing that not even Joe Biden was willing to do, these “secondary sanctions.” But way beyond simply escalating the war, which he’d already been doing in various ways, to make an enemy out of India is just so bizarre I can’t even really process how it could have happened beyond the stated theory of “he’s senile and Lindsey Graham is really good at kissing his ass.”

I form my own opinions on things, and then before considering them solid enough to share with you, dear reader, I go see what other smart people are saying. I’ve read and listened to a lot of different smart people since Trump did this attack on India, and everyone has said the same thing: “I have no idea why he would do this.” He is making all of these threats, talking about how America can do anything to anyone, and none of it makes any sense. I don’t think it is some calculated move by any “deep state,” and instead it seems like the opposite; he’d been doing this tariff thing for however many months, and shortly after the India attack, a federal court called him up and said all these tariffs are illegal, he doesn’t have any of this authority. He’s saying he’s going to rush it through the Supreme Court, so we’ll see how that goes, but in terms of India, I think it’s over. I think Modi wanted out for the reasons listed above, and I think the people of the country are angry enough that he can use this as a wedge issue to distance himself from the US.

But hey – whatever.

I don’t know why it’s happening, but I know I like this a lot.

The collapse of the empire is the only news story that really matters. All of this other stuff is really just a distraction, entertainment at best. They’re never going to give you the Epstein files. They’re not going to deport millions of people. Obama is not going to be arrested. Shroud is never going to be prosecuted for cheating at video games. But every day, you can open up your internet device and watch the empire ending.

As I type up the final words of this essay, my laptop is on my knees as I squat in the street taking a shit in a show of solidarity with the Indian people. Looking up at the clear blue Autumn sky above this shitting street, I can see the shadow of a new world order, coming into view.

I was on a roll with the Epstein articles and I have a really good one that was almost finished. But I was fasting and then stopped and I think I got refeeding syndrome. Terrible runs for days now. It was only a five day fast, I didn’t think refeeding was an issue, but yeah, it turned into a big mess.

Anyway, I’ll finish the Epstein thing tomorrow or whatever, but now this Thai-Cambodia thing has blown up and I’m going to sloppily post a forum reply I wrote, just so I’m posting something.

A forum poster wrote:

You know, Anglin predicted all this.

What article was it, a few years back, where he said “we are effectively in World War 3. World War means ‘world at war’. We will see more countries acting on settling old grievances unrelated to the ‘main’ war” ?

I think it was a lot of articles. It was sort of one of my main themes the last few years.

This is basically India-Pakistan 2, though less complicated. Thai is 100% the aggressor here. The UN and the whole world recognizes the disputed area as Cambodia, and there isn’t a moral justification in the way there is with Kashmir (Kashmir is 97% Muslim, whereas Preah Vihar is as far as I know 0% Thai, although Thai/Khmer is less defined since it’s solely a language, with same genes/religion).

Anyway, you can argue who started the India-Pakistan thing, in this current case, Thai just all of the sudden started mounting forces on the border then killed a Khmer soldier in May, then the PM of Cambodia leaked a phone call of the party gurl PM of Thai apologizing and calling him “uncle,” then she had to resign and Thai got angry about the leak and made moves last week.

Right now, the issue is Cambodia used old BM-21s to respond to Thailand and (presumably accidentally, these are not precise systems) blew up a 7/11 killing like a dozen people. Then Thais who crossed the border got their legs blown off by landmines, which Cambodia claims (at least plausibly) were Pol Pots mines, not new mines. So now Thai is saying that although it is an objective matter that they started the whole thing, they have to take revenge for the 7/11 and landmines by… no one knows what exactly. Are they saying they’re going to occupy the disputed territory?

Anyway, Cambodia for obvious reasons is crawling with Chinese military, but China hates getting involved in anything, and they definitely do not care much if Thailand wants to steal a hundred square kilos of land.

But it is what I predicted, yeah, where there is so much war everywhere, everyone is like “well, we can do that too.” Thailand started this for domestic reasons, they have a lot of problems, but it seems that Cambodia escalated with the release of the call because it’s a lot better for them domestically than it is for Thailand (just basic rally round the flag), and also, they know there can’t be a real war because of the Chinese visiting forces in Cambodia. “Visiting” being sort of a euphemism. I don’t even know if the Chinese use that term, it’s an American term for the occupation of Germany/Korea/Japan/Philippines/etc. Of the American occupations though, Korea is the only one that wants it, while Cambodia wants as many Chinese soldiers and equipment in their country as is possible.

I think this is going to be solved soon, but just like with Pakistan-India, you’re putting a band-aid on a bullet hole. Thailand is going to have to back down and basically tacitly admit this was all their fault and totally unprovoked (or rather, provoked by the French 100 years ago). And at any time the US can go to Thai and be like “hey we’ve got a bunch of planes and missiles and shit, you want to go to war with the Chinese in Cambodia?” and Thai will say “we thought you’d never ask.”

Further Information

That was the reply, but since this is an official post on the official site, I should maybe add some background information. Preah Vihar is an ancient Hindu temple which is of course now used as a Buddhist site like all the ancient Hindu sites in Indochina. When the French left Cambodia (which they occupied while not occupying Thailand), they drew a border for Cambodia. Before the late 19th century, there wasn’t really borders in the modern sense in the third world, and a lot of these border drawings were a disaster (look at Africa or many Middle East countries). In Cambodia it was pretty easy, as Khmers were a cohesive group so you weren’t forcing a bunch of different ethnic/religious groups to live under a single government. But there was never a clear border before, and both sides wanted the temple in the border region. The French gave it to Cambodia and then the UN repeatedly said the French border was valid and Thailand should respect it.

There is a lot of stuff about the fact that the ruling families in Thailand and Cambodia were getting along pretty well until the Khmer PM (technically the old PM, father of the current PM, but still the primary authority in the country) leaked the call which appeared to show that the 38 year old party gurl Thai PM not only admitted Thailand was at fault, but also admitted she didn’t have control over her own military. It’s hilarious he recorded this call then just immediately posted it online, and it certainly revealed the nature of the situation, but the party gurl’s father, who is arguably the most powerful man in Thailand, viewed this as a personal betrayal, and has actually stated publicly that this whole thing is now personal. Saying “I’m settling a personal score” is a weird thing to say when dozens of people are now dead. Or at least it seems weird to Westerners.

There are 72 million people in Thailand and 17 million in Cambodia, and neither country has nukes, meaning it isn’t exactly like Pakistan-India. (It was so funny when Pakistan said “when don’t have the rocket systems to send these nukes anywhere but at you – they are only for you.”) But the strategic importance of Cambodia to China (not to mention the billions in investment) means that in some sense, Cambodia has the upper hand. Despite the fact that the US frames China as “aggressive,” their last military action was in 1979 – to protect Cambodia from a Vietnamese invasion. (For the record, the US has been in dozens of conflicts since 1979, making it pretty cartoonish for them to accuse China of “aggressiveness.”)

With as passive as China is, they’re not going to let Cambodia get actually invaded in a serious way by US-backed Thailand. And the fact that Thailand is the aggressor – having started it unprovoked and then literally gone around saying it’s a personal vendetta – means that China doesn’t really have to worry about optics in the way they do in a lot of other places. It’s unfortunate the 7/11 got blown up, but it’s pretty obviously an accident, and it was done after Thais had already bombed Cambodia. Further, Cambodia is saying Thailand is using cluster bombs, which is probably true (people lie in wars but in this case, Thailand’s actions are so egregious and obvious that no one on the Khmer side needs to lie – they could have said the 7/11 bombing was a false flag and didn’t, just said it was an accident). The UN will presumably investigate the cluster bomb claims as well as the claims that the mines were Pol Pot’s and not new mines. Just based on facts though, it’s really unlikely they are new mines. They were on the Thai side of the border, so the idea that Cambodia is sending special forces to mine the Thai side while the whole (relative small area) is swarming with soldiers and drones is sort of a ridiculous claim. And again, Thailand, by everyone’s admission, started this. So blaming them for anything is silly.

I mean, I’m the anti-Jew-Faggot Empire guy, so I want to do a full disclosure and say of course I support the Khmer side against the gay marriage, legal weed, US-aligned Thai side. But I’m just giving you facts here. No one, including the Thais themselves, claim that Cambodia started this. Again, there are parallels to Pakistan-India, but in that case, both sides could make claims the other side started it. In this case, Thailand had political problems, and just up and decided to mount their forces on the Khmer border and start talking about retaking territory that has been determined a part of Cambodia since 1907.

So, I’ll just repeat: it’s very unlikely that this will spin out of control in the immediate future. Donald Trump has made threats about tariffs, and every country responds to these, but the bitterness is not going to go away when the conflict stops, and it is yet another place on the planet where war could break out in a serious way, and definitely would break out if there was any serious conflict between the US and China.

These simmering and potentially hot areas exist all over the world. No government is really happy with their borders, and in general, the majority of populations of countries will always support their government in a war.

Finally, I just want to point out the obvious: if the US actually believed in a “rules based order,” they would be sending infinity weapons to Cambodia to defend their sacred border and the CIA would be all over reddit calling for “volunteers” to go fight to defend the sacred border.

In actual reality, borders are not sacred in any way, virtually all of them are completely arbitrary, with the least arbitrary being those that were settled by wars that ended in serious defeat of the country with the counter-claim, such as the US Mexico border, where the Mexicans got so wrecked that no one can seriously question the validity of the border. But borders are a new thing, historically, and they exist for purely practical reasons. The claims after the Russian invasion that “borders are sacred” was the weirdest nonsense ever, especially from the US, which did Kosovo and was, at the time Russia invaded the Ukraine, trying to do Kurdistan. And, should I even have to say it, is the biggest supporter of Israel, which is the least border-respecting country on earth. When Assad fell last year, Israel annexed a further 400 square kilometers of Syria.

A world order cannot be run by a country with no principles and no attempt at fairness in regulating international disputes. The UN, for all my criticisms of it, is a place where all countries can meet and hash out these kinds of disputes, but the US simply refuses to recognize anything they say as meaning anything. We need a new world order, where conflicts are not solved by slogans and dumb emotional bullshit. There is no logical reason that with the nature of technology and international trade that war should even exist at all anymore (with maybe the exception of really primitive areas of Africa, but even then, third parties should be able to mediate conflicts in a way that is satisfactory to all parties).

The problem is that the US is the current Big Boss and it is run by Jews who like war because they don’t respect anyone’s right to self-determination, believing that they are God’s chosen ones and therefore have a divine right to decide how everyone on earth behaves, and with therefore use both social engineering programs and violence in order to enforce their vision of a world shaped in their own image.

End of an era.

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to European countries:

I’m here today to directly and unambiguously express that stark strategic realities prevent the United States from being the primary guarantor of security in Europe.

Realities prevent the U.S. from being… pic.twitter.com/ArYT7qO95f

— Clash Report (@clashreport) February 13, 2025

So, I’m quitting this job soon. This daily news thing. I will quit it when you least expect it, and you’ll be like “and just like that, he was gone.”

But I’m not really going to be gone. I’m just not going to do daily news.

I do want to do a long thing about how the Trump rapprochement with Russia fits into a larger plan of trying to isolate China. If we’re going through a period where US foreign policy is no longer exclusively about gay sex, then there is no obvious reason to be at war with Russia, and there are a lot of foreign policy people who want to include Russia in some kind of alliance against China.

I don’t think that is going to happen, because there is no way Russia would detach from China in favor of joining a nation as ridiculous as the US. Furthermore, the US can’t actually “confront China” because the US is eternally indentured to Israel, and the promises to those Jews are so massive that it is going to make any attempt at seriously doing a war with China impossible.

But this is the underlying logic behind what is happening: cool things down with Russia, maybe even try to be friends with them, in order to try to isolate China, because China is the superpower. Russia is definitely not “a gas station with nukes,” as evidenced by the fact that the US just lost a war to Russia, but Russia is also not China.

China was a sleeping dragon that woke up very abruptly and is now swallowing the world. If the US had any serious desire to continue to be the dominant global superpower, they never would have started this war with Russia, and they would be overthrowing Bibi Netanyahu and installing some multi-culti socialist government in Israel.

RT:

The US intends to refocus its military priorities to confronting China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific and defending the homeland, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth stated on Wednesday.

The homeland in the Indo-Pacific?

Does he mean Guam?

Speaking at a defense gathering in Brussels of NATO and non-NATO countries that support Ukraine, the newly appointed US secretary of defense signaled a significant policy shift by Washington and urged European allies to take the lead in their own security.

Hegseth emphasized that “stark strategic realities” require Washington to focus on securing its own borders and countering threats from Beijing.

Threats which include a highly sophisticated balloon. Those threats also include… well, mostly it’s just the balloon.

But what a balloon it was.

“The United States faces consequential threats to our homeland,” he said, stressing “We must – and we are – focusing on security of our own borders.”

Hegseth identified China as the foremost challenge, describing it as a “peer competitor” with both the capability and intent to threaten US national interests in the Indo-Pacific region.

“The US is prioritizing deterring war with China in the Pacific, recognizing the reality of scarcity, and making the resourcing tradeoffs to ensure deterrence does not fail,” Hegseth concluded.

Yeah, that’s what you would want to do. I mean, if you were these lunatics. If you were normal, you’d make deals with China, you’d compete with them economically, you’d create a better world for everyone.

But the people who run the US – Jews, mostly – do not want to compete with anyone and don’t think they should have to compete. They think they should be able to build global monopolies that are not required to compete with anyone and therefore can function by hiring indentured servants from India while putting their own citizens on fentanyl.

So, if that’s your mindset, you should not be screwing around in some useless field in Eastern Europe or fighting a seven-front war for Israel, you should be building up military forces in allied Asian states and preparing for a war with China.

.@SecDef Pete Hegseth spoke with Philippine Secretary of National Defense Gilberto Teodoro Jr. on strengthening U.S.-Philippines defense ties, reaffirming the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty, and enhancing deterrence in the South China Sea. Read more: https://t.co/r7lk2S3bqJ pic.twitter.com/PfYg3oq9cT

— US Mission to ASEAN (@USMission2ASEAN) February 10, 2025

DeepSeek, Path of Exile 2, BYD, and other advancements by China prove that the US has zero chance of maintaining the current status quo through anything other than outright war.

But the US is too goofy and incompetent to actually fix these things. They spent decades acting like they were the only power in the world, and therefore could focus their resources on making everyone gay, and it’s too late to roll all that back.

But that is clearly the goal of the people planning Trump’s foreign policy, which is why all of this USAID psycho shit got dumped first, at the same time Trump is making friends with Putin.

It’s not a revolution. I think good things will happen with Trump, things we will like, but it’s still the same system. There’s no revolution. And there are people in the system who are sharp enough to understand the things I just said here, to understand that China has made the US status quo unsustainable, and the only possible solution is a war.

That’s the shape that is taking form, but you have all these freaks and Israel-obsessives latched on. Furthermore, the US war machine is not what it used to be, which is why Hegseth is saying that they’re ready to completely dump Europe.

Of course, dumping Europe creates the threat that the Europeans, specifically the Germans, will start doing serious business with China, and that will lead to strategic alliances there.

The other problem is that Trump himself doesn’t want this war with China, and would rather make America a good country that competes with China for the benefit of everyone. Maybe that isn’t a huge problem, because as we saw last time he was president, he can’t really do anything. But it is worth mentioning.

A chess game gets to the point where there is no series of moves you can make that will result in winning. There could be ten moves left, but no matter what you do, you’re going to lose. That’s where the US is right now. They have not officially lost, but there is no series of moves they can make to win.

Jews always destroy their own kingdoms with their Jewish behaviors.

China should just ban these “cars.”

They are a threat to public safety.

AP:

Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes don’t work! Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into an SUV and a sedan and crashing into a large concrete barrier.

Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the car’s brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than $23,000 in damages and publicly apologize to the $1.1 trillion company.

Zhang is not the only one to find herself in the crosshairs of Tesla, which is led by Elon Musk, among the richest men in the world and a self-described “ free speech absolutist.” Over the last four years, Tesla has sued at least six car owners in China who had sudden vehicle malfunctions, quality complaints or accidents they claimed were caused by mechanical failures.

The company has also sued at least six bloggers and two Chinese media outlets that wrote critically about the company, according to a review of public court documents and Chinese media reports by The Associated Press. Tesla won all eleven cases for which AP could determine the verdicts. Two judgments, including Zhang’s, are on appeal. One case was settled out of court.

The February 2021 crash in central China’s Henan province sent Zhang’s mother and father, who had a concussion, to the hospital for four days, medical records show. Zhang — who was unharmed in the accident, as was her baby niece — wanted to understand what had happened: How could her dream car have turned into such a nightmare?

Traffic police determined that the crash was her dad’s fault because he hadn’t maintained a safe following distance. Zhang, however, insisted that the brakes had malfunctioned, sending the car out of control. She filed a complaint with a local market regulator, requesting a refund and compensation. Teslas are among the most computerized cars on the market, so Zhang asked the automaker to turn over the full pre-crash data from her car, hoping it might help explain what went wrong. Tesla refused.

“Tesla’s employees were very arrogant and tough in dealing with my complaints,” Zhang said in an interview. “I was burning with anger.”

After weeks of stewing, she draped her damaged car with a banner proclaiming “Tesla brake failure” in front of the Tesla dealership in Zhengzhou, the capital of Henan province, some 200 km (124 miles) from her home. She sat on the Tesla’s roof and blared her protest through a bullhorn: “Tesla Model 3 brakes failed,” she said. “A family of four almost died.” The next month, she parked her damaged car outside an auto show in Zhengzhou. It was all to no avail — Tesla refused to turn over the full data and mediation went nowhere.

Tesla said Zhang had deliberately spread false information that damaged the brand and asked for 5 million yuan ($684,000) in damages.

The case, which a court took up in October 2021, came as Tesla faced a barrage of criticism in China.

Dozens of Tesla owners had been publicly complaining about alleged brake failures, battery fires, unintended acceleration and other defects, as well as what they claimed were misleading sales practices. The same month as Zhang’s crash, Chinese regulators summoned Tesla to respond to quality concerns raised by such reports.

Zhang’s emotional protest sparked a rare burst of criticism of Tesla in Chinese media. Under pressure from regulators, Tesla finally released the data from her car, which the company said showed her father had been driving nearly 120 km per hour (75 mph) and that the brakes had functioned to reduce the magnitude of the collision.

Tesla had finally given Zhang what she’d been asking for, but they’d published the data publicly and included her vehicle identification number. She said she and her family started getting threatened and doxed online. Besides, she wondered, how could she be sure Tesla hadn’t modified or redacted the data from her car? It was less than the victory she’d hoped for. Feeling besieged, she sued Tesla a second time, in March 2022, for invading her privacy.

Zhang lost both cases she brought against Tesla.

Meanwhile, the defamation case against her was grinding along. Back in court as a defendant, Zhang was unable to prove that the brakes on her Tesla had indeed failed. In a closed trial, a Shanghai court ruled in May 2024 that Zhang’s public complaints went beyond what magistrates considered reasonable, factual criticism and ordered her to publicly apologize and pay 170,000 RMB ($23,000) to cover damages and the legal costs of the world’s most valuable car company.

Zhang appealed the ruling. She maintains that her lawsuit is a cry for transparency and accountability and that a company as rich and powerful as Tesla should be able to tolerate legitimate criticism from its customers.

“I refuse to accept it,” Zhang told the Associated Press, “As a consumer, even if I said something wrong, I have the right to comment and criticize. I spoke about my feelings as a user of the car. It has nothing to do with damaging their reputation.”

Her odds of winning the appeal against Tesla do not look good. Tesla has not only won the defamation cases it brought against unhappy car owners and critical journalists, it’s also prevailed in lawsuits customers have filed against it.

Zhang posted videos about it on her Weibo account.

Safety advocates worry about the implications of Musk’s proximity to power in the United States. Federal investigations and safety initiatives Musk has long railed against could be easily snuffed out by the new administration.

In the U.S., Tesla also has been subject to a raft of customer safety complaints and lawsuits over autopilot function, battery charging, alleged suspension defects, sudden braking or acceleration, faulty airbags and allegedly monopolistic practices on repairs and parts. Judges have dismissed some cases. In others, Tesla settled out of court or paid hefty settlements.

Tesla has not publicly sued any of its U.S. customers for speaking out, though in January, Musk said on X that “maybe it is time” to sue media outlets for coverage that could stain Tesla’s brand. His post has been viewed more than 22 million times.

Tesla has already successfully done that in China.

It’s sort of ironic about the “free speech” thing, no?

NEWS: BYD has unveiled an advanced driver-assist system called “God’s Eye” that it plans to install on its entire model line-up including its $9,600 Seagull hatchback.

“BYD wants to democratize self-driving tech. BYD had previously only offered such features, which enable cars… pic.twitter.com/712xeGSQli

— Sawyer Merritt (@SawyerMerritt) February 10, 2025

How much is a self-driving Tesla, which isn’t really self-driving and will kill you?

They screw with the numbers on their website, and no one pays MSRP, but I’d guess a Tesla with the “full-self driving” (which again, isn’t full self-driving) is well over $60,000, and then you pay $8,000 to turn the “FSD” software on.

It is the most ridiculous thing in the world that the Chinese are selling EVs with FSD that works and which you don’t have to pay for for $10,000.

It seems like if people were aware of this, they would be angry that the US government is preventing them from buying these cars. Being able to get any brand new car for $10,000 would really help a lot of Americans, who are struggling with money a lot more than people in China.

Reuters:

China’s BYD on Monday started offering advanced autonomous driving features on most of its models including ones priced as low as $9,555, far undercutting competitors such as Tesla in a move analysts say is set to start a new price war.

They had already announced this and I wrote about it months ago.

I don’t know why Reuters just lies like this. Maybe they’re talking about the English language press release, I don’t know, but this is definitely not a new announcement.

The electric vehicle giant has equipped all of its BYD-branded models priced above 100,000 yuan ($13,688) with the company’s proprietary “God’s Eye” advanced driver-assistance system, BYD founder Wang Chuanfu told an event livestreamed from Shenzhen.

It has also installed the system in three models priced below 100,000 yuan, the cheapest being the Seagull priced from 69,800 yuan. It began sales of those models, 21 in total, immediately after the event. Wang said these would be the “first batch”.

BYD Seagull EV looks like a “baby Lamborghini” because its head designer, Wolfgang Egger, also designed Lamborghinis and Alfa Romeos.

BYD slashed Seagull’s price to $9,700 — that’s a THIRD of the price of Tesla’s mythical small $TSLA that’s still years away from production. https://t.co/ELGWHZC7bO pic.twitter.com/xh6VJitxv4

— Facts Chaser 🌎 🤦🏻‍️ (@Factschaser) March 6, 2024

BYD had previously only offered such features, which enable cars to navigate highway traffic autonomously under human drivers’ supervision, in models priced from $30,000. Tesla has these features available in China in its EVs priced from $32,000.

…

Anticipation over how BYD’s smart driving plans could shake up the already highly competitive automotive market has built up since last week, sending the firm’s shares up by 16% since Thursday when Chinese media reported on plans for the event.

I think the Teslas in China are forced to install the BYD software for FSD, since Tesla’s own FSD will just kill you, and often kill others as well.

Tesla recently won a court case based on the claim that they don’t claim that the product they call “FSD” is actually “full self-driving,” and it’s actually just a fun little gimmick, and you need to keep your hands on the wheel at all times or it will crash.

To be fair, even the Google FSD works. It’s being used in San Francisco and Phoenix, and it works. They have driverless taxis. They kill people sometimes, but they basically work. Tesla is not even involved in these pilot programs, because they can’t get any FSD to work at all.

Somehow, Elon goes around talking about how he’s the leader in FSD. It would be one thing if the US media was hiding the fact that China’s works (even if they are printing backpage Reuters news items about it), but the fact that Google’s works makes it very strange that Elon is able to continue getting away with claiming his FSD is the industry leader.

100% of non-Tesla drivers managed to avoid crashing into this pole but the Tesla Cybertruck driver who relied on Elon Musk’s defective $TSLA FSD v13.2.4 managed to crash into the pole 🤣 proving YET AGAIN that Musk’s hyper-hyped cameras / vision-only approach is a dangerous flop. pic.twitter.com/0jA4eIf6ZM

— Facts Chaser 🌎 🤦🏻‍️ (@Factschaser) February 9, 2025

Everyone in the government must know about Tiananmen Square, where six million peaceful protesters were turned into soap by the Red Chi-Coms. It is our values that at any time, every AI device on earth spew out very accurate gibberish about the totally real Holocaust-like event committed by these communists, and that these devices do not mention the fact that before the Chinese military moved in, the peaceful protesters were lynching police officers. It doesn’t matter that these “student protesters” were rioting, burning everything, and murdering cops. The Chinese government should have surrendered and allowed itself to be overthrown!

Never mind the cops being murdered and their corpses displayed atop burned buses. The AI should not talk about that part. They need to talk about the millions dead, and the fact that there doesn’t even need to be evidence of this, because Chinese people are evil and even if they didn’t kill millions, they could have.

Look at this:

That’s what matters. The tank stopped, and the guy was arrested, but what if it hadn’t stopped?

Don’t show these ones:

Those protesters were peaceful and maybe those tanks caught on fire spontaneously and those protesters were trying to help by putting the fire out.

Or maybe the communists set their own tanks on fire? Ever think of that? Chinese people would do that because they hate freedom.

The protests were very peaceful, and if they were lynching cops and burning everything, that was no different from the BLM protests, which were also very peaceful in the name of our democracy values.

It is foundational to democracy that everyone believe that trillions were massacred by communists based on the claims of one reporter who was not even there. All AI must be programmed to say this, or our democracy will be completely destroyed.

RT:

Lawmakers in the US House proposed legislation on Thursday to ban the Chinese-developed AI chatbot application DeepSeek from all government-owned devices, the Wall Street Journal has reported.

DeepSeek has rapidly ascended to become the most downloaded app in the United States. However, concerns have been raised after analyses by cybersecurity experts have claimed that the application contains hidden code capable of transmitting user information to China Mobile, a state-owned telecommunications company prohibited from operating within the US. Washington has accused Beijing of being able to access sensitive data through its applications.

It says right in the app that you shouldn’t put in private data in because it is all accessible by the company.

Beijing has dismissed the accusation as politically motivated “ideological discrimination.” China’s foreign ministry has denied the allegations, asserting that the government does not require enterprises or individuals to collect or store data illegally. DeepSeek has not issued a public statement addressing these specific accusations.

”This should be a no-brainer in terms of actions we should take immediately to prevent our enemy from getting information from our government,” Democratic Congressman Josh Gottheimer stated. His colleague, Republican Representative Darin LaHood, echoed this sentiment, asserting, “Under no circumstances can we allow a CCP [Chinese Communist Party] company to obtain sensitive government or personal data.”

Unfortunately for the US government, every publicly traded American AI company is now legally obliged to copy the open source code of DeepSeek in order to follow their fiduciary duties.

It would be a crime against the shareholders to keep using busted American AI models when the Chinese one is so much better and freely available.

It’s not clear if they will be able to get it to pump out goofy bullshit about “10,000 dead” in Tiananmen Square. I think they will be able to do that, but they’re still going to be using Chinese software as their base code.

This is only the beginning of the new reality that the US is going to fail if it doesn’t steal Chinese technology.

Well, it’s going to fail regardless.

But this situation where Telsas are three times the cost of BYDs and 25% as efficient, where Xiaomi and Huawei are releasing phones five times better than iPhones for less than half the price, while the US covers this all up by blocking import of Chinese products and running around talking about Winnie the Pooh and the six trillion dead innocent victims massacred for literally no reason at Tiananmen is coming to an end.

China is now developing technologies that can’t simply be banned from the US, and Chinese technological advancements are creating a situation where the US is going to be left behind in a primitive state while the Chinese rapidly advance into the future.

Russia and China have stepped up military activity in the Arctic, while the US sees the region as crucial for territorial defense. As the Arctic increasingly features in the geopolitical spotlight, work is on to develop drones that can endure extreme cold https://t.co/kgUc67q7lS pic.twitter.com/MujMxiYhT0

— Reuters (@Reuters) January 30, 2025

Everything is drones these days, and the enemies of the US government are much further along in developing these technologies, while the US focuses on useless wokeness such as triggered trannies and bluepilled niggers.

The last thing the US invented was the internet, decades ago. They can’t invent anything of value, and their military development is a total global joke.

Reuters:

In 2023, Mads Petersen, owner of Greenland-based startup Arctic Unmanned, sat in a car to keep warm while he tested a small drone at minus 43 degrees Celsius (minus 45 degrees Fahrenheit).

The cold soon drained the drone’s power.

“The battery only lasted for three minutes,” he said.

Governments in the world’s far north are seeking to overcome such challenges as the region comes increasingly into the geopolitical spotlight.

Russia and China have stepped up military activity in the Arctic, while NATO states in the region are reporting more acts of sabotage on energy and communications lines. President Donald Trump has recently revived U.S. claims to Greenland.

The conflict in Ukraine, meanwhile, has shown that unmanned aircraft can provide critical intelligence and strike capabilities on the battlefield.

The United States, which sees the Arctic as crucial for territorial defence and its early warning system against nuclear attacks, said in a July strategy document it would focus on unmanned technology to counter Chinese-Russian collaboration there. Russian and Chinese bomber planes flew together off the coast of Alaska in July and their coast guard ships sailed together through the Bering Strait in October.

But drones – whether multicopters or fixed wing models – are vulnerable. Only the largest, long-range models have enough power for anti-icing systems like those used by aircraft. Cold, fog, rain or snow can cause a malfunction or crash.

With countries boosting military spending, a Reuters survey of 14 companies and six defence ministries and armed forces in northern Europe and America shows the industry working at pace to buy or develop drones that can endure icy conditions, and increasing urgency among NATO states to acquire them.

“We are all having to catch up with Ukraine and Russia,” said General Major Lars Lervik, head of the Norwegian Army.

No global data is publicly available on states’ military drone fleets, but Lervik said the war in Ukraine has given Moscow and Kyiv valuable experience of drone technology that NATO countries lack.

Russia, whose military began building up a drone fleet in the Arctic in 2014, took an early lead in the race to control the Northern Sea Route, a passage between Europe and Asia along Russia’s northern coast, said James Patton Rogers, a drone expert at Cornell University and a UN and NATO policy adviser.

Russia’s Zala Aero, part of the Kalashnikov Group, already offers drones designed for extreme Arctic conditions and Russia has also said its long-range S-70 Okhotnik combat drone can operate at minus 12 Celsius and will be deployed there.

“We’re moving towards a point where Russia will not only have unarmed surveillance drone systems along the Northern Sea Route, but potentially armed systems that are constantly patrolling those areas as well,” said Rogers.

He said NATO had been slow to devise a coherent response. NATO said it has strengthened its presence in the Arctic and set up a new  Command to keep Atlantic lines free and secure; NATO states are investing in new air and maritime capabilities.

…

Weather-resistant models are not the only solution. The U.S. Department of Defense has said it will buy tens of thousands of cheap drones with a kamikaze brief as part of a programme started in 2023 that will focus on the Indo-Pacific. It did not respond to a question on whether it may risk littering the Arctic with drone debris.

“Sometimes it’s actually cheaper to … build something super cheap where we can just have thousands of them, and we don’t care if we lose some,” said Gregory Falco, head of the Aerospace Adversary Lab, a U.S. research centre that designs defensive and offensive capabilities for the Department of Defense.

…

Finland in 2023 added 2,000 small drones to its army’s fleet of around 250 older ones. These can, according to their French manufacturer Parrot (PARRO.PA), opens new tab, fly in minus 36 degrees Celsius. They have been used in winter exercises in the north, the Finnish army says.

Other countries with territory in the region are drawing up plans to purchase winter-proof drones, budgeting tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.

Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command, which is responsible for security in and around Greenland, does not have any drones. Copenhagen last year set aside 2.7 billion Danish crowns ($381 million) for two long-range models to operate in the Arctic and this week said it would buy two further drones. The country has also set aside 60 million crowns for smaller models, but gave no further details.

Canada is buying 24 winter-capable medium-sized drones and 40 small ones for its navy, the Canadian Armed Forces said in an email. The forces currently operate around 150 older small and medium-sized drones.

Soldiers are basically useless now. That might benefit the US, since all their soldiers are bluepilled niggers and woke trannies.

But this is the age of drones, and the US can’t figure that out, because they are so woke and bluepilled.

POV: You’re an American Soldier on the front lines in China, and you see a coordinated swarm of over 1,000 drones. WYD?

Lmao this is terrifyingly amazing. pic.twitter.com/S7gnReXLEp

— DD Geopolitics (@DD_Geopolitics) January 29, 2025

Italy has been a bluepilled cesspit ever since the death of their leader, Mussolini.

It’s likely that woke kikes across the EU will now move to ban the patriot AI from DeepSeek, and the US itself will likely attempt to take a swing at it.

RT:

Italy has become the first country to ban the Chinese AI model, DeepSeek, after its data protection authority blocked the app on Thursday, citing concerns over its handling of personal data. 

Developed by Hangzhou-based startup DeepSeek Inc., the AI assistant of the same name was released last week and has become an online sensation after toppling US-based OpenAI’s ChatGPT as the most popular AI assistant on Apple’s App Store.

The removal followed a request by the authority, Garante, for detailed information about the application’s data usage, including what personal data is collected, its sources, the intended purposes, legal grounds, and whether the data is stored in China.

The issue arose after Euroconsumers, a consumer rights group, filed a complaint against DeepSeek over its handling of personal data. In response, the Italian watchdog requested detailed information about the company’s data storage practices, giving DeepSeek 20 days to reply.

However, DeepSeek’s initial response was considered “totally insufficient,” Garante said in a statement.

“Contrary to the authority’s findings, the companies declared that they do not operate in Italy, and that European legislation does not apply to them,’‘ the statement said, noting that the app had been downloaded by millions of people around the globe in just a few days.

No AI chat app, or really any app, protects anyone’s privacy.

There is definitely no difference between the privacy level of DeepSeek and OpenAI. It says right in the ToS that you’re not supposed to enter sensitive information into the app because none of it is private and will be used for various purposes.

Are Italians not responsible adults capable of making their own decisions about these things?

Are they children?

Or is this yet another woke conspiracy to prevent people from becoming redpilled and turning patriot?

Italy has been a bluepilled cesspit ever since the death of their leader, Mussolini.

It’s likely that woke kikes across the EU will now move to ban the patriot AI from DeepSeek, and the US itself will likely attempt to take a swing at it.

RT:

Italy has become the first country to ban the Chinese AI model, DeepSeek, after its data protection authority blocked the app on Thursday, citing concerns over its handling of personal data. 

Developed by Hangzhou-based startup DeepSeek Inc., the AI assistant of the same name was released last week and has become an online sensation after toppling US-based OpenAI’s ChatGPT as the most popular AI assistant on Apple’s App Store.

The removal followed a request by the authority, Garante, for detailed information about the application’s data usage, including what personal data is collected, its sources, the intended purposes, legal grounds, and whether the data is stored in China.

The issue arose after Euroconsumers, a consumer rights group, filed a complaint against DeepSeek over its handling of personal data. In response, the Italian watchdog requested detailed information about the company’s data storage practices, giving DeepSeek 20 days to reply.

However, DeepSeek’s initial response was considered “totally insufficient,” Garante said in a statement.

“Contrary to the authority’s findings, the companies declared that they do not operate in Italy, and that European legislation does not apply to them,’‘ the statement said, noting that the app had been downloaded by millions of people around the globe in just a few days.

No AI chat app, or really any app, protects anyone’s privacy.

There is definitely no difference between the privacy level of DeepSeek and OpenAI. It says right in the ToS that you’re not supposed to enter sensitive information into the app because none of it is private and will be used for various purposes.

Are Italians not responsible adults capable of making their own decisions about these things?

Are they children?

Or is this yet another woke conspiracy to prevent people from becoming redpilled and turning patriot?

Americans were shocked that the US got BTFO on AI by the Chinese.

What people need to understand is that China is going to beat America at everything. America is a Jewish country that is less than 50% white, and all of the tech companies are monopolies that employ useless Indians.

There is no solution to this problem.

America has already lost to China.

TCD:

China has unveiled yet another massive breakthrough in the realm of high-speed rail travel, courtesy of a new prototype train and a plan to install even more high-speed tracks in the next five years.

According to China Daily, the country plans to add 1,600 miles of new rail lines in 2025 and 7,000 miles of high-speed track by 2030. This comes on top of the 100,000 miles of rail lines and 30,000 miles of high-speed tracks that have already been built in the country.

China has one of the best and most extensive rail systems in the world, and its high-speed system is already the envy of virtually everyone. The star of the show has been the CR400 locomotive, but that could soon be a thing of the past as well.

According to CNN, China unveiled the prototype for the CR450, so-named because its max speed is 450 kilometers per hour (279 mph). The CR450 will operate commercially at 400 kilometers per hour (249 mph), making it the fastest train in the world.

Both the new track and train will aid China’s goal of making “travel between major cities possible in just 1-3 hours” while also supporting rapid cargo transit around the country.

America no longer does any projects at all.

The roads are complete trash, because corrupt unions with immense influence on the government insist on using trucks to carry goods, instead of trains and boats, because that allows them to get obscenely rich off of the transport industry.

Meanwhile, the government is too obsessed with spending trillions on foreign wars and paying for useless immigrants to fix the roads anyway.

America is a total shithole.

A tale of two countries.

The USA, who takes money from it's people and sends it to other corrupt leaders in other countries and spends countless amounts on needless wars.

And China, who takes money and reinvested it back into their own country and people.

Can you tell which… pic.twitter.com/dLpGtMCdHO

— Noctis Draven (@DravenNoctis) January 16, 2025

Where would you rather live?

This is what happens when you turn control of your country over to the Jews.

China is an example of what a modern country should look like in the current year if its government is run by people who care about the welfare of the nation.

Americans truly are the fattest retards, which is why they continue to babble on about “the greatest country on earth,” celebrating their Jew masters and their army of infinite niggers.

If America was the greatest country on earth, it wouldn’t be run by Jews and less than 50% white. It would be prosperous and nice, with a lot of freedoms, like China.

china is living in 2050

Chongqing pic.twitter.com/X0kAs9be1s

— AlhayzaX️ (@AlhayzaX) January 28, 2025

Surprised by China’s🇨🇳 ability to outmatch the US🇺🇸 in AI with DeepSeek?

You shouldn’t be. This is Guangzhou, one of the top 5 of China’s most economically powerful cities. It’s miles ahead of the US’ major cities.

Turn off the Western media propaganda about China, and you… pic.twitter.com/IsY4eYCJwc

— Afshin Rattansi (@afshinrattansi) January 29, 2025

Imagine being from Ukraine and watching this video from China during your 20 minutes of electricity a day 😆
pic.twitter.com/tSz9jvHKQk

— Gabe (@GabeZZOZZ) August 30, 2024

Dazzling drone light show at NianHua Bay Zen Town, Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, China.😍 pic.twitter.com/X3DocV891F

— ShanghaiPanda (@thinking_panda) January 30, 2025

China's Prettiest Bookstore: Shenzhen pic.twitter.com/pUb81osTtT

— Johannes Maria (@luo_yuehan) January 29, 2025

China has the world’s HIGHEST bridge. So high! pic.twitter.com/PiS0hjD98A

— Li Zexin (@XH_Lee23) January 29, 2025

Video completo de los robots bailarines en la celebración del año nuevo chino. 😍😍 pic.twitter.com/JREsbb3ety

— hanwen zhang 🐲张汉文 (@hanwenzhang1982) January 28, 2025

China is doing amazingly and none of it was paid for by needless wars. We could learn a few lessons my friends. pic.twitter.com/36Ls5VtXAR

— Noctis Draven (@DravenNoctis) January 3, 2025

🇨🇳 China is a marvel of engineering and innovation!
pic.twitter.com/WQzbjMX0r3

— Gabe (@GabeZZOZZ) August 20, 2024

SCHOOLS IN CHINA ARE TEACHING CHILDREN ABOUT THE GENOCIDE IN GAZA 👏🏻 pic.twitter.com/fCGChIGqev

— Sulaiman Ahmed (@ShaykhSulaiman) January 27, 2025

Robotic gas station in chinapic.twitter.com/aIJSlF5ghx

— Learn Something (@cooltechtipz) January 29, 2025

I see China has taken inspiration from the regime in Iran, and it's just about as embarrassing as you'd expect. pic.twitter.com/FTr52e3wOq

— 𝗡𝗶𝗼𝗵 𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗴 ♛ ︎ (@NiohBerg) January 29, 2025

China will always amaze us 😳 pic.twitter.com/MDJixm9apz

— 😈 Xavier ✞ (@RealXavier011) January 29, 2025

Chinese cities at night.
“China has been at war for years, its economy has been devastated, and people are living in misery. Once the war is over, we must build a new, modernized and powerful national economy.”
– Mao Zedong, February 1949pic.twitter.com/uQuAVjgOlU

— ShanghaiPanda (@thinking_panda) January 23, 2025

If they “stole everything” then why is it all better than the stuff in America?

If China was “stealing everything” from America, their country would be run by Jews and filled with useless niggers!

America is 100 years behind China, and the gap is widening at a rapid pace as America continues to get shittier and shittier and China continues to advance at a rapid pace.

But just keep claiming that Winnie the Pooh is illegal in China, even as the US government passes laws making it illegal to criticize a foreign country, you pathetic blobs.