More than 1K kids reported missing in Ohio in ‘extraordinary surge’ https://t.co/cN15eDjfKD pic.twitter.com/3460SDc3jE

— New York Post (@nypost) September 26, 2023

There is a strange darkness in America.

Ohio appears to be one of the center points of this darkness.

If the kids are being kidnapped, raped, and murdered (which is obviously horrible, but something we are able to understand), we would be finding their bodies.

We’re not finding their bodies.

Where are they going?

New York Post:

Children are disappearing from northern Ohio in record numbers, with more than 1,000 minors reported missing so far this year.

More than 45 children have gone missing in the Cleveland-Akron area this month alone, and in August, there were more than 35 missing minors, according to the Ohio attorney general’s missing children website.

The disappearances are creating a disturbing trend in northern Ohio, which began in May, when nearly 30 children went missing in just the first two weeks.

Officials at the time called it an “extraordinary surge” in disappearances.

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost repeated on Monday that the number of missing children is alarming — though he claimed the figure may be inflated due to inconsistencies in updating reports, which the Cleveland police have admitted to in the past.

It can also involve “Amber Alert” bullshit that is basically always a father “kidnapping” his own kids from their stupid evil abuser whore mother.

“Yes, of course we are worried about that,” he told News 5 Cleveland.

“Now, what we know is when we look behind the numbers, some of those represent repeated runaways and local police have talked about that.”

He added that data for runaway cases, abductions, or sex trafficking is not always entered correctly as the state deals with a police staffing shortage.

Huh.

“All of these things have localized reporting problems that, again, are a function of local conditions,” Yost said.

“We do our best to encourage compliance and improve assistance to remove barriers, but at the end of the day, we have to rely on our local partners that we don’t control.”

“I am fearful of all kinds of things that fall through the cracks, that include missing children,” Yost added. “I rely on the tenacity of a worried parent more than I do a harried bureaucrat whose job it is to put data into a computer.”

But John Majoy, president of Cleveland Missing and the police chief of Newburgh Heights, previously sounded the alarm on the surge in missing children.

“For some reason, in 2023, we’ve seen a lot more than we normally see, which is troubling in part because we don’t know what’s going on with some of these kids — whether they’re being trafficked or whether they’re involved in gang activity or drugs,” he told Fox News back in May, adding that he has not seen such high numbers of missing children before in his 33-year career.

Is it a satanic conspiracy?

I grew up in Ohio, and I think it probably is. I have seen weird things in the woods – not exactly like the dolls from True Detective, but similar things.

As a kid, it was also accepted that there were people who lived in the sewer system, and I’ve seen photos of what appear to be ritual alters down there. I know more than one person who claimed to have seen people in robes carrying flame torches in the underground.

Of course, you know – who knows?

Aside from “kidnapped by their father” situations, there are also teenage runaways. I can’t find the numbers on how many of these are actually small kids. “Milk carton kids” are a real thing, and it seems that some of these kids were indeed raised in satanic cults.

There is a lot of material on this topic of varying quality. Ted Gunderson was a former FBI Los Angeles chief (pretty high rank) who retired and claimed that there was a gigantic satanic cult conspiracy in America.

Here’s a video of him (there are many more you can look up):

Some of his information seems incorrect, though there was a preschool with underground tunnels.

This is some of the first “alternative” material I got into as a teenager. I believe that at least some of it is true. And, I believe, Pizzagate is real. I don’t know if there were tunnels under it, but I think the owners were clearly involved in child molestation and I think people in the government were aware of it, and that it amounted to a more extreme version of Jeffrey Epstein (where the youngest girls were like, 15, which, despite claims, is not a “child”).

This 1993 documentary was banned before it aired:

That is mostly about the Franklin Cover-Up, which was orphan children (boys) being used by Republican politicians as part of a blackmail ring.

True Detective really is the best media about this (season 1 only). That was based on all this stuff from the 1990s. You have poor people who are inbred doing weird sex stuff, and then that is linked somehow, through a network involving the FBI and other intelligence, to state/federal government elites.

I think the German Netflix show “Dark” is also very good, and deals with some of these themes from a non-American perspective.

(I never watched the third season and recently went back and tried to watch it and realized it was too complicated – it has time travel – and I would have to start over. I might do that at some point and write a review. It’s possibly the single best modern serial of all. Squid Game was good from an artistic perspective, though the actual content is sort of meh, and it has serious plot problems. True Detective only had that one good season, though I would rank that up there with the best. It’s actually shocking how bad most of these shows are. The people who did the live action Cowboy Bebop should be in prison. Oh and I love Midnight Mass, though that poor Irish Catholic boy who made it has been ruined by his Jew wife, and the ending fails totally – you don’t know if it’s a Catholic show or a satan/Jew show, and you’re wondering the whole time you’re watching it, and then it decides to just flop around. It should have ended with the priest saying “It was never about me. It was about God.” Instead, it does that, then adds some atheist/Jew bullshit – like they were trying to make everyone happy and made no one happy. But until the botched ending, it’s a great show, and if the Christian themes would have been completed, I would say it was my favorite.)

I wrote a lot about this during Pizzagate, but that whole movement got totally out of control and turned into QAnon nonsense. So, it’s hard to know where to draw the line. You can speculate, but you have to have facts.

I might try to pull some primary sources on the situation in Ohio, and see what number of these kids are under the age of 13 and disappeared completely.

Again: teenagers running away and getting involved in drugs/prostitution is bad, people kidnapping and raping kids and killing them is obviously one of the worst things we can imagine, but we understand those things.

If kids are disappearing and their bodies are not turning up, maybe some of them are just successfully buried, but it is also possible that they are being used as part of satanic rituals and mind control cults linked to the CIA and a larger satanic cult conspiracy.

Homosexual child molestation is ultimately now coming out into the public, and presumably, there are people who want a satanic pedophile/child sacrifice/cannibalism cult to come out into the public. At this point, I’m not sure Americans would protest it very much.

Alex Jones would just say “you shouldn’t be able to sacrifice and eat anyone under 17.”

Alex Jones DEFENDS transgender surgery for 17yos by comparing it to EUTHANASIA!
Jones is so extreme he doesn’t believe children should wait before getting full surgery!

Jones sickly declares if you should be able to take your life, you can alter and defile your body in anyway. pic.twitter.com/WDzVrkQF4D

— Esoteric Shaggyism (@EsoShaggy) April 16, 2023

Previously:

• Jews Move Ukrainian Orphans to Israel, Europe
• Male Jews Allowed to Escape Ukraine, White Males Forced to Stay
• There are No Male “Civilians” Between the Ages of 18 and 60 in the Ukraine

The Ukraine was a playground for corruption.

Basically a Disneyland for the satanic and psychopathic elite. That’s why they were developing chemical weapons there. It’s why they were doing all these extreme corruption scandals, the most famous of which involving Hunter Biden.

Furthermore, it was very easy for Middle Eastern states to entice white women from this country to come to their countries and be put into sexual slavery.

I imagine – though I don’t have solid proof or even evidence, but I would certainly imagine – that this was also where anyone who wanted a young, white child for whatever nefarious purposes would go to pick them up.

The Guardian:

Children are going missing and cases of human trafficking are being reported by aid groups and volunteers along Ukraine’s borders amid the chaos of the refugee crisis triggered by the Russian invasion.

Charities and rights groups working in neighbouring countries to receive refugees said they had seen cases of trafficking, missing children, extortion and exploitation as more than 2.5 million people crossed into neighbouring countries to escape the escalating violence.

Karolina Wierzbińska a coordinator from Homo Faber, a human rights organisation based in Lublin, Poland, said the charity had seen cases of children being sent alone by desperate parents to meet relatives or friends across the Ukrainian border and arriving without anyone to meet them.

…

At nearly every train station near border crossings, crowds of people, often men, hold cardboard signs offering refugees lifts to destinations across Europe.

Wierzbińska said it was impossible to vet every person offering to drive refugees to friends or family before they picked people up.

…

On Tuesday, due to concerns around human trafficking, the Polish government introduced amendments to a newly passed bill, which outlines Poland’s responses to the refugee crisis, Polish Press Agency reported. The amendment raised the minimum sentence for human trafficking from three to 10 years, and the maximum prison sentence for sex trafficking of children from 10 to 25 years.

Poland’s deputy interior minister, Maciej Wąsik, said: “We want to send a clear message to the criminals who are trying to exploit the tragedies of the refugees.”

Unicef, the UN children’s agency, said that while the Polish government’s decision to open the border so completely to Ukrainian refugees was to be applauded, “it does present challenges” in terms of child protection.

Usually the UN would register refugees at the border and identify vulnerable people such as unaccompanied children. “Now, obviously, because of the sheer scale of the numbers who are coming over, and the fact that the borders are effectively just open, this isn’t happening, which makes it incredibly difficult to identify children who are unaccompanied and separated,” said Joe English, a Unicef spokesperson. He said that the agency was setting up a system of ‘blue dot’ safe spaces for children in seven countries receiving refugees.

This is of course going to get mixed in with cases of Ukrainian women refugees becoming prostitutes. Prostitution has now been renamed “sex trafficking.” There is no such thing as a “prostitute” in Western media/governmental language anymore.

Along with being a part of the feminist agenda, renaming prostitution as “sex trafficking” also muddies the waters on actual, real life sex trafficking, which is obviously the real goal of it.

Some bimbo escaping the Ukraine and going to work in a brothel in Prague is not at all the same thing as disappearing children, but now, these things must always be spoken of in the same breath.

It really makes you think.

At the Mexican border, you had people doing child kidnapping to get across the border. You also had people just sending their children alone to the border. (These things were happening under Trump, before the border was wide open, now they’re not really necessary.)

But white people don’t usually do things like that with their kids. It’s part of white evolutionary biology to be very protective of their children, because it was so much more difficult to produce and raise children up to adulthood in colder climates.

If children are going missing, the logical explanation is that someone is kidnapping them.

The fact that QAnon has driven the government and media into openly supporting pedophile child trafficking is fascinating to me.

They should be aware of what a great accomplishment this is, actually. The government and media are forced to bare their teeth.

KJZZ:

The Utah Attorney General’s office abruptly pulled the plug on an anti-child trafficking rally after it came to light that organizers of one of the groups involved are sympathetic to the QAnon conspiracy theory.

The “Freedom for the Children” rally was one of several planned in dozens of cities across the U.S. and worldwide under the banner of ending child trafficking.The event was heavily promoted by the Utah Attorney General’s office on their social media channels.

An investigation by NBC News found that many of the organizers of these events were believers in the QAnon conspiracy theory, and the Saturday demonstrations were heavily promoted by QAnon supporters.

QAnon is a right-wing conspiracy theory that posits in part that there is a secret cabal of cannibal pedophiles in the highest levels of the American government who are engaged in child sex trafficking.

Local organizers of Saturday’s rally, with the help of the AG’s office, were partnering with the Arizona-based “Freedom for the Children” organization to put on the event. After questions about the legitimacy of that group were raised with the AG’s office by UtahPolicy.com, organizers decided to nix the rally.

The AG’s office was also partnering with legitimate anti-child sex trafficking groups on the event, including the Three Strands Global Foundation.

So even with what they admit are “legitimate” child defense groups, the event is being shut down.

It seems to me that the government and the media that supports it simply have an issue with people opposing child abuse.

I wonder why?

Maybe this 1992 documentary has some answers.

The Utah decision to ban an event against child trafficking comes after the CNN Jew told Vice President Mike Pence that it is anti-American to be against satanic pedophilia.

Say what you want about QAnon. I think a lot of it is silly, and much of it has proved to be completely wrong, but if these people want to do activism against child trafficking, that should be their right in the United States of America.

But apparently, that isn’t the case. If the media decides you’re bad, you no longer have the right to try to help children.

As a follow-up to my piece on my opposition to stranger adoption, I thought it worthwhile to look at the defense of this practice by the evangelical cult member David French.

David French is a neoconservative writer for the National Review, who was attacked during the run-up to the 2016 election for taking a very Jewish position against Donald Trump, claiming that he was “not a true conservative” because of his opposition to globalism. French is a virulent supporter of mass nonwhite immigration, endless “intervention” wars in the Middle East and international “free trade” schemes, among other Jewish globalist plots.

I should say off the bat that I have no idea if David French is simply a psychotic lunatic hellbent on the destruction of Western civilization, or a low-IQ, low-testosterone moron who has somehow tricked himself into believing a litany of nonsensical Jewish gibberish. It may be interesting to analyze him and see if we find him to be a disingenuous fiend or a genuine cult member, but I will not do that here.

In August of this year, French wrote an article entitled “America Soured on My Multiracial Family” for the progressive Jewish publication The Atlantic to defend his neoconservative Jew beliefs about the moral goodness of kidnapping and trafficking children from the third world.

It tells the story of French and his wife traveling to Ethiopia to purchase a female child who he swears was not trafficked and simply the victim of unfortunate circumstances.

He gives his reasoning for doing so as a Bible verse:

[A verse from the] Book of Galatians, declares an eternal truth: “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” As a result, my wife and I not only felt called to adopt, but we believed that race was no barrier to unity for a family of genuine faith.

Of course, any Bible verse can mean anything you want it to mean if you separate it from the historical authority of the Church, which Evangelicals have aggressively done. If that particular verse is intended to signal God’s support of interracialism, one could also suppose it supports homosexuality transgenderism – if races can switch back and forth, then why not genders? It says “nor is there male and female,” right?

In fact, this very verse is now being used by churches to justify homosexual and transgender behavior, although it wasn’t in 2010 when French was using it to justify international human trafficking.

Indeed, throughout the article, French bizarrely refers to the child he bought as his “daughter,” something that is no different than a homosexual talking about his “husband” or a man in a dress calling himself “she.”

His crybaby tragedy of rejection begins with talking about how liberals began opposing the adoption racket in the 2010s, after it was revealed that disgusting depths to which these churches were sinking to profit off of this new form of legalized child trafficking and how they were manipulating governments around the world to engage in the capturing of children to be sold on the American market.

He cites the book “The Child Catchers: Rescue, Trafficking, and the New Gospel of Adoption” by Kathryn Joyce as the source of this liberal conspiracy against his “multiracial family.”

The book is merely a documentation of the practices of human trafficking engaged in by these churches:

When Jessie Hawkins’ adopted daughter told her she had another mom back in Ethiopia, Jessie didn’t, at first, know what to think. She’d wanted her adoption to be great story about a child who needed a home and got one, and a family led by God to adopt. Instead, she felt like she’d done something wrong.

Adoption has long been enmeshed in the politics of reproductive rights, pitched as a “win-win” compromise in the never-ending abortion debate. But as Kathryn Joyce makes clear in The Child Catchers, adoption has lately become even more entangled in the conservative Christian agenda.

To tens of millions of evangelicals, adoption is a new front in the culture wars: a test of “pro-life” bona fides, a way for born again Christians to reinvent compassionate conservatism on the global stage, and a means to fulfill the “Great Commission” mandate to evangelize the nations. Influential leaders fervently promote a new “orphan theology,” urging followers to adopt en masse, with little thought for the families these “orphans” may already have.

Conservative evangelicals control much of that industry through an infrastructure of adoption agencies, ministries, political lobbying groups, and publicly-supported “crisis pregnancy centers,” which convince women not just to “choose life,” but to choose adoption. Overseas, conservative Christians preside over a spiraling boom-bust adoption market in countries where people are poor and regulations weak, and where hefty adoption fees provide lots of incentive to increase the “supply” of adoptable children, recruiting “orphans” from intact but vulnerable families.

The Child Catchers is a shocking exposé of what the adoption industry has become and how it got there, told through deep investigative reporting and the heartbreaking stories of individuals who became collateral damage in a market driven by profit and, now, pulpit command.

Anyone who seeks to adopt—of whatever faith or no faith, and however well-meaning—is affected by the evangelical adoption movement, whether they know it or not. The movement has shaped the way we think about adoption, the language we use to discuss it, the places we seek to adopt from, and the policies and laws that govern the process. In The Child Catchers, Kathryn Joyce reveals with great sensitivity and empathy why, if we truly care for children, we need to see more clearly.

Here’s an interview she did with NPR.

French does not discuss the fact that his own story of flying to Ethiopia to purchase a child whose mother he never met (but who was alive, he was told) was so similar to the stories that Joyce recounted about governments pressuring families to give up their children to be sold to American Christian groups:

In the summer of 2010, we journeyed to Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, to pick up our youngest child, Naomi Konjit French. As with every adoption story, hers begins with profound loss. Her unwed mother surrendered Naomi to her grandmother and grandfather and then disappeared from her life. Her grandparents were subsistence farmers, barely able to eke out a living. Then her grandfather died, and Naomi and her grandmother began to starve. By the time Naomi was 2 years old, she weighed barely more than 14 pounds. That was her condition when she was abandoned again—this time lovingly turned over to an adoption agency. Her grandmother simply couldn’t keep her alive.

Instead of wondering why the very unlikely story told to him about his own “daughter’s” journey to being sold to him is a hoax, French simply asserts that maybe some bad things have happened in certain rare cases within the adoption industry, but that the anti-adoption movement was an attack on Christianity.

Of course, that makes zero sense as the liberals currently support the agenda of massive nonwhite immigration, and work hand in hand with the same evangelical churches that supported population transfer through child trafficking. Based on the fact that the liberal and Jewish groups now work directly with the evangelical groups to move massive numbers of people into America, it is more likely that when the evangelicals said “we just need to get as many Africans trafficked here as possible, and make as much money as possible in the process,” liberals generally agreed but felt child kidnapping went too far.

Evangelical Christians are social justice activists pushed to the extreme by the belief that they have God on their side in their quest to forward the globalist agenda (evangelicals are so stupid that they believe that Jewish globalism will lead to a Christian dominion; basically, this theory is designed to justify the fact that brown people are the only ones dumb enough to show up at their churches anymore, and again, all the money they make trafficking them).

The liberals, he notes, also have the idea that white parents are incapable of raising a black child:

Before we adopted, we of course knew that there has long been political opposition to transracial adoption. In 1972 the National Association of Black Social Workers famously declared white adoption of black children to be a form of “cultural genocide.” But that was decades ago. By the 21st century, American churches were fully engaged in an adoption movement.

…

But then came a backlash. Claims of cultural imperialism, wounded national pride, and rare, sad horror stories of exploitation or abuse soured foreign nations against American families.

This again points to the fact that the whole “liberals are the real racists” meme is actually true, as liberals at least accept that differences exist between races, while conservative cucks believe in a more pure version of the Marxist ideal of universal equality.

French then goes on to whine about Trump supporters wanting to stuff his kidnapped African child into a gas chamber:

Then, sometime around the summer of 2015, we began to notice a shift. The attacks on our family came less and less from the left, and increasingly from the so-called alt-right—a vicious movement of Trump-supporting white nationalists who loathe multiracial families. They despise international adoption. They call it “race-cucking your family” or “raising the enemy.” Heaven help you if they find you online, and find us they did. In part because I criticized their movement directly—and in part because I refused to support Donald Trump in 2016—they came after us with a vengeance.

They lifted pictures of my then-7-year-old daughter from social media and Photoshopped her into a gas chamber, with Donald Trump pressing the button to kill her. They put her image in slave fields. They found my wife’s blog and filled the comments section with gruesome pictures of dead or dying African Americans. They made me wish for the days when the left came after us; at least progressive critics didn’t want my daughter to die.

Yes, it seems that everyone is very uncomfortable with this situation of David’s.

It is simply naturally repulsive, to all people, to see a black child with a white family. Both blacks and whites would feel the same about a black family with a white child, I’m sure.

French closes with the theory that the backlash against his decision to purchase an African child proves that this is not the Kingdom of Heaven:

We love our daughter more than we love our own lives. But the idealism of 2010 is gone. Then, we thought our family reflected the future. Now we know that was naive. Now we know that while the promise of Galatians—the promise that we are “all one”—is true in the Kingdom of Heaven, in America it does not yet apply.

Weird paragraph.

So that’s David French’s tragic tale.

But What About White Children?

Whereas African children are almost universally bought by smug do-gooders like David French, who wish to show the world how morally righteous they are – a criticism that French mentioned in his piece but did not attempt to refute, simply talking about how much he loves this random black kid he bought – white children are much more precious, and generally sought out by people who cannot produce their own children.

I doubt that many regular readers of this site needed much convincing that “adopting” African children is bad, but presumably, some of you think that the situation is different for white children.

In actual fact, it is not different. It is the same child-trafficking infrastructure setup by these evangelical groups, and the same system of buying children from their mothers in poorer countries. I remember in the late 90s and early 00s when this adoption thing was going nuts, people would talk about how it was some tens of thousands of dollars to adopt a white child, while a black child was much cheaper. The word “adopt” was clearly a euphemism for “purchase,” but it seemed that no one recognized this fact.

As ABC News reported earlier this year, it presently costs an average of $35,000 to adopt a white baby, while it costs only $4,000 to adopt a black baby.

Most of the white children trafficked by the evangelical adoption movement were from Russia and other former East bloc countries. These countries had legal abortion, due to rampant poverty, prostitution and general social chaos following the collapse of communism. So, the churches moved in and started telling women that instead of aborting their children, they could sell them. You can never know, but I very much doubt this stopped very many abortions – it did, however, give women the ability to legally sell their children, something which white Western society has generally not allowed for some hundreds or thousands of years.

Putin outlawed international adoption when Western countries began allowing homosexuals to adopt boys as child sex slaves. It appears that that particular issue triggered an investigation of the “adoption” industry, after which it was shut down. For the record, Ethiopia, where David French bought his trafficked child, has also banned this practice.

My original mention of the adoption issue was in regards to John Roberts trafficking children he’d purchased under questionable circumstances from Ireland through South America (some extreme “adoption” child purchases are routed through third countries in a type of “child laundering” to obfuscate fraudulent paperwork). Ireland was the last white country to keep abortion illegal, and it has also traditionally had some issues with poverty, so it was a great place for evangelical child trafficking operations to setup shop, and they made some good money buying white babies there and selling them at a huge premium in the West.

Ireland and Eastern Europe both have strong families, and these babies, even if they were from poor families or from single mothers, could have had good lives with their own natural relatives, but due to the Crusade of “saving children from abortion and making a good profit,” they were sold on the international market.

Domestic “adoption” is not that much different, with the evangelical movement not simply pushing girls to not have abortions – which is fine, okay, I get that – but aggressively pushing adoption as the alternative, in part because they think this is a tricky way to undermine their own massive political failure in stopping the legalization of abortion, and in part because there is a very serious financial incentive to mediate the adoption process.

Furthermore, although I am opposed to abortion, it is clear to me that adoption is much worse.

Just a Really Bad Idea

Ultimately, whatever the race, the problems are going to be the same: with any issue that the child has, the parent is going to ask: why is this my problem? This leads to regret and often to abuse.

It is a biological imperative to care for your own family – including your extended family. But raising someone else’s child removes the bond that is necessary for parent and child to truly have a meaningful relationship.

Just as race is real, other genetic relationships are real, and though the genetic gap is bigger with a person of another race, anyone who is not a member of your family is genetically much different from you. The child appears to have a difficult time learning to operate its own biological machinery. If you look at yourself, you will notice that you have the same mannerisms, movements, ways of speaking, etc. as your father and/or brother, uncle, grandfather (hopefully not too many from your mother). This is because you learn how to operate your own biological machinery by looking at your relatives do it, and adopted children are effectively downloading the wrong software for their systems.

The list of problems goes on and on. As I said in my previous piece, most famous serial killers were adopted, and adopted children are 15 times more likely to commit murder, and probably hundreds or thousands of times more likely to kill the people raising them.

As Dr. David Kirshner, a clinical psychologist who has been hired to consult on cases of adopted children murdering one or more of their adopted “family members” writes:

Since 1987, I have been a consultant or expert witness in 20 homicide cases in which the accused was adopted, usually as an infant, or in early childhood. In every case of these adoptees who killed, we have found a remarkably similar pattern, including a history of sealed original birth records, a childhood of secrets and lies (re: birth parents and genetic history), frustrated, blocked searches for birth parents, and untreated, festering adoption issues of loss, rejection, abandonment, identity, and dissociated (split-off) rage.

Interestingly, this sub-group of adopted killers whom I’ve seen consistently had a strikingly similar fantasy of the birth mother: That she was an all-giving, all-loving, nurturing, wonderful, perfect being. I had expected to find conscious anger/rage directed at a malevolent, rejecting bad mother – but instead there was this paradox of an idyllic birth-mother-fantasy image. The anger and rage toward birth parents was there – but deeply repressed, often dissociated and cut off from consciousness, and ultimately acted-out with violence toward the adoptive parents or others. In these extreme cases, the split, false, secret self described by many adoption experts, had evolved into a more malignant, clinical Dissociative Identity Disorder (aka Multiple Personality Disorder).

The opposite also appears to be true, with adoptive parents being orders of magnitude more likely to kill children they’ve adopted than parents are to kill their natural children.

The website Pup Pound Legacy, devoted to “exposing the dark side of adoption,” has compiled many of these types of horror stories.

No one benefits from this practice, most certainly not the children. Though David French’s story is bizarre, it is in fact standard that any parents who choose to purchase someone else’s child and raise it as their own have some form of horror story to tell.

Right now, whatever remains of the evangelical adoption racket is only promoting child trafficking. They are incentivizing women selling their children internationally, or morally blackmailing them domestically. There were not all of these children to “adopt” before an industry was built around it. In fact, orphanages had cleaned out after the industrial revolution, when most everyone was doing well enough or at least had a relative that could care for a child if they had one accidentally.

Furthermore, advances in medical science over the last 20 years have made it so virtually any infertile couple – assuming that the source of the infertility is something other than the woman’s age – can produce a child themselves that is related to both of the parents – or at least one of them – for significantly less money than it costs to buy a white child from the evangelical child-trafficking cartel.

“Adoption” should be outlawed.

Orphanages can still exist in case there are any remaining street children in America, as this environment is much healthier for children with no families than living in the case of single family. In an orphanage, the children with no families are able to form bonds with each other, based on their shared circumstances.

You think this is sad? Then you might be a Nazi. And by might, I mean you totally are.

For years, liberals and Jews have stayed silent as “conservatives” (Nazis) engaged in a relentless campaign to stop child trafficking.

Well, not anymore.

It’s time to take a stand and refuse to allow the reactionary right to impose their bigoted, Euro-centric views of how children should be reared on the rest of the world.

Kidnapping children and moving them across the border in order to sell them into sex slavery is merely an expression of vibrant latinx culture – not a crime.

NBC News:

Immigration advocates on Thursday criticized the Trump administration’s plan to conduct genetic testing on migrant children and parents separated as a result of its “zero tolerance” policy, saying the move is invasive and raises concerns over what the government might do with the biological data.

Not only could the Trump regime stop child trafficking, but they might actually use the DNA data to develop race-specific bioweapons. And by might, I mean they totally will.

Oh, man, this reminds me of Wing Commander IV. You know, that other scifi franchise starring Mark Hamill.

If you support testing children to ensure whether they crossed the border with their real parents, you implicitly support the development of bioweapons. Remember that.

The federal government will be conducting the DNA tests — via a cheek swab — for every detained migrant child and then seeing if the DNA matches that of their purported parents, Cmdr. Jonathan White, assistant secretary for preparedness and response at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), said Thursday morning.

The move to collect DNA also raises serious concerns about consent for the children involved, said Jennifer Falcon, communications director for the immigrants rights group RAICES.

But what if the child consents, tho?

Hey, the a little tactical anarcho-capitalism never hurt anybody. Not without the NAP being first violated, at least.

“They’re essentially solving one civil rights issue with another — it’s a gross violation of human rights,” she said. “These are minors with no legal guardian to be able to advice on their legal right, not to mention they’re so young how can they consent to their personal information being used in this way?”

How can a child decide whether they want to be sold into sex-slavery by Mexican cartels? They can’t. This is why this decision should be make by qualified and responsible adults, such as child-traffickers. Not by the Nazis in the Trump administration.

She added that the administration’s fluctuating numbers on the number of separated children and the DNA testing showed “they did not do intake correctly and did not keep track of who they were separating.”

She criticized the administration’s reasoning that DNA tests were needed to quickly facilitate reunifications.

“They themselves have said they know where all the parents and children are so I think that’s bogus,” she said. “When people are detained they are fingerprinted already so why do they need DNA swabs if these people wen through the proper intake process when they were detained?”

Yes – exactly.

This is just a transparent attempt by the Trump administration to separate children from their traffickers. And we’re not going to stand for it.

#CoyotesArePeopleToo.

Don’t ever let anybody tell you the left doesn’t stand for anything.

The next time some smarmy little shit tells you that Mexicans are “based” or “natural conservatives” or all about “family values,” you show them this story.

My San Antonio:

A Medina County man accused of sexually assaulting five former foster children, including several in Bexar County, took in more than 180 young girls over a five year period, officials said.

That leads investigators to believe there could be numerous other victims who have yet to come forward.

“It’s not a question about whether there are more,” said Medina County Sheriff Randy Brown. “It’s just about how many.”

I bet you that if I had just mentioned the part about this Mexican taking in poor girls as a foster parent, every Oprah-watching suburban mom would start cooing and every fat boomer on a rascal would start burping out the national anthem with their chubby hand over their cholestoral-encrusted heart.

But then, no one wants to hear about what happened AFTER some spic figured out that he can get his hands on some teen girls because of how mind-numbingly retarded most White people in this country have become.

They always tune out when you try telling them that part, don’t they?

And there’s even an interesting Corpo-Globo-Homo link in the story:

Brown said Child Protective Services contracted with a third-party company, who has not yet been publicly identified, to place the girls in Briseno’s home.

“Those girls were taken from some environment and then you have some jackass like him abusing these girls that already have troubles,” Brown said. “I’m aggravated at the whole system. I’m aggravated at the company that placed these girls. It was a money-making deal, the way they were running those girls through there like livestock. It wasn’t about making a better world for them. They were making a profit off them.”

How much do you want to bet that its some Jew-run company?

Selling the goyim off into indentured servitude as sex toys is standard Corpo-Kike operating procedure. I would literally not even bat an eye, and I wager neither would you.

Representatives of Child Protective Services could not immediately comment on the relationship with the company.

Two of the charges against Briseno are out of Medina County, and the remaining three originated in Bexar County. Brown said Briseno first became a foster parent while living in Von Ormy, where the alleged assaults occurred, and later moved to Devine, Texas, in Medina County.

The executive take-away is that the government has become so filled with niggers and other incompetent minorities that the kikes have no choice but to hire some private company to do their child-trafficking for them because the government would probably fuck it up at this point.

Wednesday’s arrest was not the first time Briseno was arrested on child sex abuse charges. In April 2013, the Medina County Sheriff’s Office arrested him on a charge of solicitation to commit sexual assault of a child. The arrest came after one of Briseno’s foster children said he had sexually assaulted her in August 2012, when he no longer had a foster license, Brown said.

It is not clear why Briseno did not have a license after 2010 and how Briseno still had foster children in his care two years later, though investigators discovered Briseno had attempted to move his foster parent license into his wife’s name, Brown said.

“It’s not a loophole, it’s just downright wrong,” Brown said.

Wow. They literally just passed off the girls to some already known sex abuser who couldn’t even remember to renew his Sex Abuse license in time.

Briseno pleaded guilty in September 2015 to a reduced charge of attempted assault, a Class B misdemeanor. Brown said investigators and prosecutors had difficulty securing testimony against Briseno. He was sentenced to 180 days in jail, though county officials couldn’t confirm how much time he was actually incarcerated.

Brown said his office, as well as other investigating agencies like the Texas Rangers, plan to look into the unnamed third-party company responsible for placing the children in Briseno’s care. They’re also working to determine whether his wife could be held criminally responsible.

Stories like this read like the obituary for White America.

Law and order has become a thing of the past. If you’ve got skin the color of poo, you can get away with anything. Especially if your employer is some Jewish sex trafficking company.

In White America, there’d be a posse already out in the streets looking for this guy. But in Weimerica, this guy lives off tax dollars provided him by the sweat of the White man’s labor.

The DOTR can’t come soon enough.

Really disturbing investigation into all the evidence linking Clinton and her entourage to pedophilia and child trafficking.

It’s ludicrous that such demonic people are being considered for the highest office in the land…

And we have a full report from r/The_Donald:

Some readers might be shocked by the graphic descriptions of sexual abuse in this article.

One of the earlier articles I wrote at this blog was a piece called ”Just Another 300 White Girls Raped And Tortured” in which I expressed my anger and dismay at the causal manner in which the mainstream press were reporting on yet another ghastly case of English girls as young as eleven being sexually abused and tortured by non-White, Muslim men in Oxford.

The Oxford Grooming Scandal now has its own Wikipedia entry and there’s been an official investigation and report into the horror which took place:

The sexual abuse included vaginal, anal and oral rape and also involved the use of a variety of objects such as knives, meat cleavers, baseball bats… sex toys … It was often accompanied by humiliating and degrading conduct such as biting, scratching, acts of urinating, being…suffocated, tied up. They were also beaten and burnt. This sexual activity was often carried out by groups of men; sometimes it would go on for days on end.

The report also contains statements and questions by the girls who were abused and their parents:

”I turned up at the police station at 2/3am, blood all over me, soaked through my trousers to the crotch. They dismissed it as me being naughty, a nuisance. I was bruised and bloody”

”Police… didn’t find me except once… I didn’t hide – I told people where I was”

”He urinated on me”

”I wouldn’t ever have said no – they’d have beaten the shit out of me”

The police, council and child protection services were, needless to say, worse than useless:

”A WPC found me drunk with men. I said I was ok and she went away and left me with them. I was abused that night”

”If a perpetrator can spot the vulnerable children, why can’t professionals?”

”A big chunk of her life has been taken away – when she should have been at the youth club or skating or the school prom – all that went missing because of them: the perpetrators and the police/social services for not stopping it when they knew”

”One manager said [before the exploitation was understood] ‘She’s streetwise, and loves it”

When ‘Girl 2’ walked into the police station covered with blood while internally bleeding and claimed:

“The Asians are raping me, they drive me around to be raped by other Asians, they threatened to slice my face off and behead my family if I refused’

And the desk sergeant replied with:

“Kids today eh! now move along young lady”

The community cohesion outreach team must have breathed a sigh of relief.

The person sitting atop the police force overseeing this carnage was one Sara Thornton, when the scandal broke Thornton flatly refused to resign. Unlike the Rotherham grooming horror show, the various branches of the public sector seemed to have learned that, having hundreds of girls raped with baseball bats and burned by cigarettes might by detrimental to public relations, and so rather than become exposed as the Neo Marxist filth they are, they instead decided to plead retard, dribbling mash-potato brain-dead levels of retard.

For example, The Oxford report claims:

”Victims repeatedly told police they had been abused and sexually tortured and care-home staff just watched as the men collected the under-age girls at night.”

Thornton and the various branches of the public sector claimed ignorance, ”We didn’t know!” they chanted repeatedly as the story broke in earnest. It does, however, make you wonder how hard they looked, after all, the Daily Telegraph was able to send a journalist to Oxford who swiftly discovered via a local imam that:

”The view of some Islamic preachers towards white women can be appalling. They encourage their followers to believe that these women are habitually promiscuous, decadent, and sleazy—sins which are made all the worse by the fact that they are kaffurs or non-believers. Their dress code, from miniskirts to sleeveless tops, is deemed to reflect their impure and immoral outlook. According to this mentality, these white women deserve to be punished for their behaviour by being exploited and degraded”

They didn’t know because they didn’t want to know. The then Prime Minister, David Cameron, who is himself  a Globalist anti-White tool, made a statement regarding the police and local governments who ‘didn’t know’:

David Cameron, speaking at a summit to address the issue after similar scandals in Rotherham and Oxfordshire, made a number of proposals, including up to five years in jail for teachers, councillors and social workers in England and Wales who failed to protect children, unlimited fines for individuals and organisations shown to have let children down, and a national helpline to enable professionals to report bad practice

Cameron’s statement is astonishing and deserves a little attention. In Britain, in the early years of the 21st century, Neo Marxism has so comprehensively saturated the public sector and the minds of the people who work within it, that they have become pathologically incapable of feeling empathy toward White children. The great Politically Correct mind heist runs so deep that the police and teachers and child protection services have become borderline psychotic…to the degree that the Prime Minister has to threaten them with years in jail if they do not at least try and care about White children being butchered by savages.

Eventually the box ticking diversity quota, Sara Thornton, was wafted out of the Oxford quagmire and into her new £252,000 a year job as head of the ‘National Police Chiefs Council’.

One and a half years later and the liberal establishment are reeling after the Brexit referendum. One of the surest signs that a people are living under an oppressive, dysfunctional and morally dead system of governance is that, when the system takes a knock, when it’s seen to be in a weakened state, the people who hate it feel emboldened. One example of this is when the German armies swept across Eastern Europe and the first reaction of an extraordinary number of Latvians, Ukrainians and Estonians was to rise up and slaughter their Judeo-Bolshevik masters, or as is commonly written today, ”inexplicably engaged in Anti-Semitism”.

Similarly, though infinitely less bloodily, working class Whites felt a release after they delivered a blow to their liberal overlords. Reports came flooding in of uppity English people actually asking immigrants when they were going back, a Black woman was told to ”Fuck off back to brownland”, a taxi driver used the word ”Paki” in the presence of a Pakistani woman, they were even reports of Hate sausages being placed on the doorsteps of mosques.

The Guardian called it a ”Frenzy of Hate” and the political class lined up to stridently condemn the racist hate frenzy which consisted of people saying ”Oi, when you going back?”.

The Metropolitan Police are not wasting time either, an entire department has been created to combat hate. You might think the apparatchik they found to head-up this new force would be above and beyond scrutiny, somebody not compromised in any way by a history of dismal failure when dealing with ‘inter-ethnic’ issues, unfortunately they chose Sara Thornton.

Freshly armed with a flashy new site called ”True Vision” which encourages non-Whites to report any transgressions of racial etiquette by Whites, the formerly incompetent Thornton has now thrown herself enthusiastically into the fight against (White) hatred and racism, according to Thornton:

Like the vast, vast majority of people, I have been shocked and disgusted at some the cases of racial or anti-immigrant abuse that have been reported this week.  We have also been heartened by the people who have intervened to challenge abusive behaviour, condemn it and reassure victims that those views are not representative of Britain.

Interestingly, we now have a ‘ national community tensions team’ meaning our diversity is such a strength we need an entire division to monitor it round the clock:

The national community tensions team has also analysed reports from forces which today shows an increase in community tension directed at the migrant community since the referendum.   In a number of forces, migrants are reporting verbal abuse, negative social media commentary including xenophobic language, anti-migrant leafleting and, in very limited numbers, physical assaults. All of these incidents are under active investigation.

Long gone now are the awkward gestures and feigned stupidity, the same people who shrugged their shoulders when a 13 year old White girl claimed to have been raped with a broken bottle by an Asian, now promise to investigate anyone who has the temerity to insult an Asian on Facebook. The Oxford report states:

 ……as a result, the girls were sometimes treated without common courtesies, and as one victim described it by “snide remarks”

They don’t have flight records to know if he went to Pakistan?

What sort of country are these people running over there?

Breitbart:

Greater Manchester Police are hunting a convicted rapist who is believed to have fled to Pakistan.

Choudhry Ikhalaq Hussain, 38, was found guilty of two counts of rape, three counts of sexual activity with a child and one count of conspiracy to rape against one victim in a trial at Minshul Street Crown Court in November last year.

He is believed to have fled the country during his trial and was convicted in his absence.

The police force said in a Facebook post that Mr Hussain told the judge that a family member had died and was granted permission to attend the funeral, which he said was to be held within the UK.

However, he then fled the country and is now believed to be in Pakistan.

Mr Hussain was convicted as part of the Operation Doublet investigation into child sexual exploitation in Rochdale.

Ten men were found guilty of a range of offences during two trials and are awaiting sentencing.

More information about how the Police force of Britain simply handed over the breeding population of the country to conquering foreign forces.

Nothing particularly new here. Just par for the course, as we give everything our ancestors gave to us over to a foreign army.

Birmingham Mail:

West Midlands Police knew five years ago that Asian grooming gangs were targeting children outside schools across the city – but failed to make the threat public.

Documents obtained by the Birmingham Mail show the force were aware pupils were at risk of child sexual exploitation (CSE) back in 2010.

The confidential report, obtained under a Freedom of Information Act, also shows police were worried about community tensions if the abuse from predominantly Pakistani grooming gangs was made public.

The West Midlands Police document entitled Problem Profile, Operation Protection is from March 2010 and highlights how grooming had been directed specifically at schools and children’s homes.

In one heavily redacted passage, entitled ‘Schools’, it states: “In (redacted) a teacher at a (redacted) that a group of Asian males were approaching pupils at the school gate and grooming them. Strong anecdotal evidence shows this MO (modus operandi) is being used across the force.”

The Birmingham Mail is unaware of any police public appeals or warnings from that time.

The 2010 report also reveals children’s homes were being targeted by gangs who used victims to target other girls. It states: “Operations in other forces have identified an MO where offenders use a young girl in a children’s home to target and groom other residents on their behalf.

“This has also been evidenced within the force in (redacted) and (redacted). The girl’s motivation to recruit new victims is often that the provision of new girls provides her a way to escape the cycle of abuse.”

Yeah, I doubt it. More likely the girls who recruited other girls got special favors and treatment from the Pakis, and anyway, had a desire to serve their alpha male masters who were running the town and bossing around the police.

That is one thing that the cuckolds responding to this Paki sex drama are generally ignoring. The girls sided with the Pakis just as much as the police did. Some of them were obviously too young to know any better, but some of them weren’t. When you’re talking about 14 and 15 year old girls, they know what was going on and they participated in it willingly.

This was a cuckolding, plain and simple.

It is natural for females to side with whoever has the power. And as we have given all of our power over to these animals, it is absolutely natural for the women to side with them over us. Women pick up on things that you couldn’t possibly pick up on, micro-expressions which continually show that the beta White man in Britain is subservient to the alpha Paki/Negro/Moslem. Following this, the monkey-faces and stench of these people mean nothing to her. She wants the man with the power. The one in charge.

White women are our collective property in the exact same way that the ground under our feet is our collective property. Subconsciously, the people of Britain, being told by the established authority to give away their land to these invading forces, are going to be giving away their women as well.

The reaction of the police is natural. It is basic psychology that if the leader of your tribe (in this situation, the government is the tribal leader and the media is its voice) is telling you to stand down to a superior invading force, you will be ready to surrender everything, and merely hope that you be allowed to keep your life.

As there is no assimilation possible with races this different (hence “multiculturalism”), there will necessarily be a dominant and submissive group. White British have purposefully become the submissive group, and it is the law of nature that all that is ours now belongs to them. All that these rape gangs are doing is asserting their natural right to the booty of a conquered land.

Obviously we treat women better than Pakis treat women. But right now, the argument is that women dating these animals is okay, they just have to treat them better. When you surrender your women to a conquering tribe, you no longer have any say in how they’re treated.

All of this talk of the abuses of the Paki trafficking gangs amounts to an attempt to negotiate a surrender after you have already laid down your weapons. If we didn’t want foreign gangs trafficking our little girls after we allowed these people to take our country, we should have negotiated a treaty saying “yes, we will give you Britain and everything in it, but you mustn’t traffic girls until they are 18.” They probably wouldn’t have honored the terms, but it nonetheless would have been the appropriate way of dealing with the question.

Until we start looking at the situation in these terms, nothing is going to make clear sense.