He must’ve won because he had more upper-body strength.

There’s no other explanation that isn’t sexist.

Breitbart:

A man pretending to be a devout Muslim woman wearing a full niqab was tossed out of a chess tournament in Nairobi, Kenya, after succeeding in making it to the last round.

The man entered the Kenya Open Chess Championship in Nairobi under the name Millicent Awuor and played through the early stages, beating one woman after another, according to an Australian news outlet.

The prize for winning the women’s tournament was a hefty $42,000, a payday that attracted 450 players from 22 African federations. So, a lot was on the line at the event.

Stanley Omondi

During the matches, the player tore through his female opponents without saying a single word. But officials eventually got suspicious when he succeeded in beating former national champion Gloria Jumba and Ugandan top player Ampaira Shakira.

The tournament staff was reported as being averse to challenging the player for fear of finding out he was a woman which would have set them up for accusations of religious discrimination. But, after taking him behind closed doors, he admitted he was a male college student just hoping to win the big cash prize.

Seriously, is there anything more worthless than women?

Why do they even exist?

Jews from authoritarian countries do behave better.

There’s actually one Jew in Iran who seems fine.

BBC News:

A chess commentator has been sacked by the International Chess Federation for making sexist comments.

Ilya Smirin was broadcasting live during the ninth round of the Women’s Grand Prix on Tuesday.

The Israeli grandmaster admitted on air he had said chess is “maybe not for women” – and also seemingly praised a woman for playing like a man.

He later told the BBC he did not want to hurt anyone and he loves and respects both chess and women.

Belarusian-born Mr Smirin – who was once ranked one of the world’s top 20 players – was making his debut as an English-language commentator in Astana, Kazakhstan.

He was initially speaking about one of the competitors, Chinese chess player Zhu Jiner. She is a woman grandmaster, which is a separate, lower title to that of grandmaster.

All chess players – men and women – can become grandmasters, which is the highest title a chess player can attain, if they have a rating of 2,500 and above. The very top female chess players have this title.

The woman grandmaster title is only for women and requires a lower rating of 2,300.

The commentators were discussing whether Zhu Jiner could become grandmaster, when Mr Smirin said: “She’s a woman grandmaster or what?… Why she wants to be like men grandmaster in this case?”

Mr Smirin went on to appear to admit that he had privately said “chess is maybe not for women”.

Fellow commentator Fiona Steil-Antoni said to him: “You’re saying, you know, ‘chess is maybe not for women’,” and Mr Smirin replied: “I didn’t say it openly… in private, private conversation.”

And he also seemed to admit saying another female player – Grandmaster Aleksandra Goryachkin – had been “playing like a man”.

“That’s true,” said Mr Smirin, when questioned about his apparent comments. “She played in Russia super final. Small minus she made, but it was very strong tournament. She also had like 2,600 plus rating.”

Challenging him again, Ms Steil-Antoni asked: “What does that have to do with playing like a man, only men can play well?”

“No, no,” Mr Smirin responded. “But she’s playing in style, positional style… But OK, I’m always curious, why can women play among men but men cannot play with women in women tournaments? Interesting question.”

Mr Smirin’s comments were picked up by several female chess players, including former female world champion Susan Polgar who called for a public apology and for him to be sacked over the “highly insulting” comments.

Dear @FIDE_chess after multiple highly insulting & inappropriate comments during live commentary at one of the most important women’s events, swift action (public apology & immediate removal) must be swiftly taken before next game. Shockingly unacceptable! @advorkovich @WOMChess pic.twitter.com/8TAeXNyoNu

— Susan Polgar (@SusanPolgar) September 28, 2022

“For the record, I have known GM Smirin for more than three decades, including our college days in Minsk,” she added.

“I always had a good relationship with him and respected his chess. I hope that this is just a bad day. I would be highly sad and disappointed if this is how he truly feels.”

Meanwhile, Woman Grandmaster Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova tweeted: “Isn’t it a pure form of discrimination? How can such a man work in the official @FIDE_chess broadcast of such an important women’s event?”

Isn’t it a pure form of discrimination? How can such a man work in the official @FIDE_chess broadcast of such an important women's event? pic.twitter.com/osdI8jipab

— Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova (@Gulruhbegim) September 27, 2022

US women’s chess champion Jennifer Shahade added: “Gross to see such sexism in the broadcast for a women’s event… Fiona did a great job in an uncomfortable convo she never should have been in.”

In its statement, FIDE – the International Chess Federation – apologised “unreservedly” and called the comments “very embarrassing”.

“Although we have great respect for Grandmaster Ilya Smirin as a chess player, the views he expressed on air are completely unacceptable, offensive, and do not represent any of the values that FIDE stands for,” it said in a statement., adding Mr Smirin “will not continue as a FIDE commentator with immediate effect”.

Mr Smirin, however, told the BBC he was “slightly puzzled” as he “did not say anything really bad, did not want to insult or hurt anyone”. He said people had labelled him as “racist, sexist and nationalist” since.

Well, he’s not a nationalist, because he’s Jewish.

But he might be racist-sexist.

This guy is ranked the 18th greatest chess player of all time. He’s only 32, meaning he could rank higher. But he’s banned from competing.

And according to the doctrine of permanent borders across the entire world after 1990, he is “a Ukrainian.”

He is literally saying that “his country” – because nations are just borders – is being liberated by alleged “invaders.”

It’s nice to see someone standing with his country and refusing to back down. He would have been sanctioned anyway, as we saw with the Russian pianist who denounced his country and still had all his concerts canceled.

RT:

Russian chess star Sergey Karjakin has reiterated his support for President Vladimir Putin, saying he “could not remain silent” despite being subjected to death threats and potential sanctions from the sports authorities.

Karjakin, who was born in the Crimean city of Simferopol and backed the reintegration of the peninsula into Russia in 2014, penned a public message in support of Putin when the military operation in Donbass and Ukraine got underway last month.

The International Chess Federation (FIDE) condemned the message and said its Ethics and Disciplinary Commission would investigate Karjakin and fellow Russian grandmaster Sergey Shipov.

But Karjakin, 32, does not regret the gesture and has doubled down on his backing for the Russian operation in Donbass and its efforts to “demilitarize” and “de-Nazify” Ukraine.

“In 2014, when I supported the reunification of Crimea, I know for sure that I was not invited to some tournaments in the West because I expressed my position,” Karjakin told Russian TV channel ‘Zvezda’.

“But when the geopolitical situation became more or less normal, they began to invite me again. So I knew what I was getting into here.

“I understand that now this situation is worse, unfortunately, because people are dying. All this is happening. But, again, I couldn’t keep silent. I felt that I should express my position.

“I myself lived in Kramatorsk [in Donetsk] for three years, from the age of nine to 12. I was really worried about all these events in the Donbass and couldn’t remain indifferent.”

…

“Because I publicly supported Russia and our president, they’re likely to impose some kind of sanctions against me. How serious they will be, I can’t say yet,” said Karjakin.

“The worst thing they can do is exclude me from the Candidates Tournament, and the Candidates Tournament is the only chance to qualify for the world title match. 

“I won’t deny, it’s unpleasant. But, even if I could turn back the clock, would I write words of support again? Of course I would. I repeat, I could not remain indifferent.”

Karjakin accused the West of double standards when it comes to free speech, shutting down any views which conflict with the narrative being pushed.

“In some commercial tournaments in Europe and the USA, the organizers said they wouldn’t invite me,” said Karjakin, who is a former world blitz and rapid chess champion.

“Again, there’s no democracy at all, no opportunity to freely express an opinion in the West… There is simply no such thing in Europe and the United States, all this is a myth about their democracy.”

Yeah, I mean. I guess you have to define “democracy,” which no one is really able to do.

It’s easier I think to say “there is no freedom.”

“Democracy,” as far as we’ve been able to tell, just means “anal sex, mass immigration, and women ruling over you.” In such a definition, America is most definitely a democracy and Russia most definitely is not a democracy.

But I guess people still think that democracy means “the will of the people” or “free representation of all individuals” or some more vague and abstract thing.

So if you’re a Russian, you’re now officially required to denounce your own country as evil before you’re allowed to participate in any international group or organization.

RT:

Russian grandmaster Sergey Karjakin is facing disciplinary action from the International Chess Federation (FIDE) after expressing support for his country’s military operation in Ukraine.

In an open letter to President Vladimir Putin shared on social media on Sunday, the Crimean-born Karjakin said he fully backed the effort to fight “for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine.”

“I appeal to you at this difficult time, when our country, led by you, is fighting for the safety of the peaceful Russian population of Donbass and the Lugansk People’s Republic,” wrote the 32-year-old.

“It is fighting for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine with its ruling regime, which has put the security of all of Europe and our country at risk, for the sake of its political goals and ambitions.

“I am closely following the ongoing special operation, in the lands where I spent my childhood, where I learned to play chess and where my relatives still live.

“For eight long years we have been waiting with hope for salvation from countless shelling and loss of human lives, the ongoing genocide by the still acting Kiev regime.

“I express to you, our commander-in-chief, full support in protecting the interests of Russia, our multinational Russian people, eliminating threats and establishment of peace! I wish you the speedy fulfillment of all the tasks assigned to our valiant army.”

Россия ️🙏✊🏻 pic.twitter.com/ToU01jVCAw

— Sergey Karjakin (@SergeyKaryakin) February 27, 2022

In response to the post, FIDE said its Ethics and Disciplinary Commission would investigate Karjakin and fellow Russian grandmaster Sergey Shipov.

FIDE, whose president is Russian former deputy prime minister Arkady Dvorkovich, announced on Sunday that it was banning Russia and Belarus from holding official FIDE events because of the Ukraine conflict.

The Russian and Belarusian anthems will be prohibited at FIDE events, and players from the two countries will not be able to use their national flags.

This is more extreme than in the cold war.

FIDE Council condemns any public statement from any member of the chess community which supports unjustified military action and brings the case of chess grandmasters Sergey Karjakin and Sergey Shipov to the Ethics and Disciplinary Commission.

— International Chess Federation (@FIDE_chess) February 27, 2022

Imagine a chess group telling you what your politics have to be.

I guess it’s normal now for employers to do this, but a professional organization making these determinations is new.

Have you ever considered that Chess is actually a racist game, bigot?

Magnus Carleson thinks so.

According to Magnus the Chess Whiz Kid Extraordinaire, the White side always moves first, which is just another example of institutionalized White Supremacy when you think about it. In chess, as in real life, the Black side is always playing catch-up because the White Supremacist system gives the White side a leg up and keeps the Black side down.

Yes, really. Watch the video, it’s short. I’m not lying.

I think I’m starting to get the logic. Here, let me take a stab at it:

Equality can only be realized when the roles switch and the Black side is allowed to go first, and a Black Supremacist system of equality is constructed to give Blacks an even greater leg-up than Whites had – to make up for centuries, nay, millennia of oppression.

Furthermore, (and no, this issue is not addressed in the video) we need to consider taking pieces away from the White side and/or make them give up their first three moves and then play with less pieces – if we are to make Chess more equal, that is. This is because, when you think about it, the rules themselves are White Supremacist and favor White players so these new measures are just about leveling the playing field.

If you are a brown player, these are the new rules for you:

• You get to move first, using black pieces
• You get three moves in succession without giving the White player a chance to respond (like they did to brown people, historically)
• You get more pieces (Whites only have rooks because they stole that technology from black people anyway, so they should have it taken from then)

These changes should be seen as a restoration, not a reinvention, of the game because Afrikangz were actually the ones who invented Chess and these were the original rules at the time.

As we all know, the White man (who was living in caves) stole the Chess technology, made black people forget it and then changed the rules to make the game favor the White (supremacist) side, by giving it a first-mover advantage.

Furthermore, Chess has a history of vicious racism that must be combatted.

It’s the only way that Chess can be rehabilitated and allowed in the wondrous Multi-Kulti state being built for us right now, as we speak, by Globo-Shlomo.

/LARP

You know, if I had said that a chess master would have come out and said something like this even 2 years ago, people would have said I was scare-mongering.

But literally everything even tangentially related to the color White is now fair game and unless someone is explicitly based and red-pilled, it is a near-certainty that they will at some point come out and say something pozzed and anti-White.

At this point, I half-expect them to come out and say that you shouldn’t bleach your clothes anymore because it perpetuates the stereotype that White=clean and that you shouldn’t separate your Whites from your colors because that reeks of segregation and racial discrimination.

Tie-dye will make a comeback.

Short your Clorox shares NOW.

Amid the general congratulations being given to this Ukrainian chess player for refusing to play in Saudi Arabia because of the strict dress code imposed on women there, no one seems to be asking the obvious question: why is there even such a thing as a female chess champion? What is the rationale for having separate championships for men and women in this game? Surely no one could seriously argue that men have an unfair advantage over women in this game because of their physique?

That fact is that all of the top female chess players in the world are far below the level of the top men.

Chess, in fact, provides one of the clearest refutations of the Equality Cult dogma that men and women are identical except anatomically.

Generally, two main excuses are given for the disparity in male and female achievement in almost all spheres.

1) Women are denied access to the induction/training process that ultimately leads on to great achievement.

So women may not be taken on as apprentices by the great master painter, or are not inducted into the “old boys’ network” in some profession. Denied knowledge of the “tricks of the trade”, they can never equal the achievements of men.

2) Women do actually achieve on a par with men, but their achievement is not recognised.

This argument expects us to believe that, throughout history and still today, there have been a host of great female poets, composers, painters, etc. who remained completely obscure because prejudiced men refused to recognise their achievements.

Neither of these arguments can apply in the case of chess, however.

Great chess players are generally self-taught. They learn by studying old matches. They don’t sit as young paduwans at the feet of some grandmaster who shows them all the tricks.

This refutes argument 1.

And chess competitions are generally open. There is an objective ranking system based on results and there are tournaments where anyone above a certain rank can turn up and take on a grandmaster. The grandmaster will walk round the room, making moves quickly, playing dozens of people at once. If some female chess genius appeared, she could turn up, beat a grandmaster and make a name for herself. There is absolutely no way that prejudiced men would be able to prevent her abilities being recognised.

This refutes argument 2.

We’re left with the conclusion that men and women are actually different from one another. Men are better at some things and women are better at others.

Bobby Fischer is seen by many as the greatest chess player of all time. Whether that is true or not, is impossible to know. But that he is the most famous, important and influential player of all time is not even up for dispute. He captivated the world with his prodigious talent and genius, and pretty much singlehandedly put chess on the map.

The 1972 World Chess Championship, in which he defeated Boris Spassky 12½–8½, was seen as a Cold War proxy battle between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which was at the time the source of the majority of the world’s most formidable players.

Fischer was only 28 years old at the time. His victory over Spassky and the Soviets, and the meteoric rise that led to it (Fischer had become both the youngest grandmaster and the youngest U.S. Chess Champion by the age of 15) was a source of great pride for our nation, and he became a national hero.

Despite his unfortunate partial Jewish heritage, Fischer also absolutely hated the Jews. He saw what they had done and were doing to the world, and was not at all ashamed or afraid to openly call them out for it, regardless of the negative consequences it brought upon him and his legacy.

Living in Brooklyn, New York, from the age of 6, Fischer had many bad experiences dealing with Jews throughout his life. The chess world was also riddled with them. According to Fischer, in a 1961 interview with Jew pornographer Ralph Ginzburg, there were “too many Jews in chess” and they had “taken away the class of the game.”

In the video above, we hear what is probably his most poignant statement against the Jews. It comes from an interview Fischer gave to Philippino grandmaster Eugenio Torre, while he was locked in jail in Japan as a political prisoner in 2005.

Here is a transcript:

A few notes on the Jew:

Jews are anti-social, destructive, intolerant, mean-spirited, deceitful, et cetera. They wish to destroy, rule and kill, rob whoever gets in their way. To facilitate them getting what they want, they have developed a perverted, unnatural, destructive, evil lifestyle.

Even though they live off the non-Jews as parasites, they still hate them and wish to destroy them. Jews hate nature and the natural order, because it’s pure and beautiful, and also because it’s bigger and stronger than they are, and they feel that they can not fully control it. Nature’s beauty and harmony stands in stark contrast to their squalidness and ugliness, and that makes them hate it all the more.

Jews are destroyers. They are anti-humans. The anti-human Jew hates and wants to destroy all non-Jews. He will also destroy even other Jews who are less destructive and evil than he is, if they get in his way.

Apparently, the wickedness of the Jew is genetically based. Jews are destroyers. They are anti-humans. By the act of circumcision, the Jew shows his hatred towards nature and the natural order. By this bloody, cruel, senseless act, he shows his cruelty and sadism, and that he will stop at nothing to obtain his ends. Surely the Jews are also behind the Islamic circumcision, which serves as an ideal cover and distraction from their own wickedness in this regard.

Jews are truly anti-human and anti-nature. Jews are intensely selfish, intolerant and anti-social, et cetera. They are full of hate, greed, malice, et cetera. Naturally, other people, i.e. the non-Jews, don’t like being bulldozed aside, robbed and murdered by the Jews, and will sooner or later resist. That is where the lies and deceit of the Jews come into place.

Following this, the interviewer objects with some platitudes about “peace and unity” and everybody all getting along, to which Fischer replies “I don’t think there’ll be any peace until these Jews are dealt with Eugene – these people are animals.”

And he was absolutely right. I couldn’t have said it better myself.

The Jews dismiss Fischer’s truthful anti-Semitic statements by slandering him as being nothing more than a crazy paranoiac (here is their most recent hit piece against him).

It’s true he maybe was a bit crazy and a bit paranoid at times, especially in his later years, but that doesn’t change the fact that he was spot-on about the evil and destructive nature of the Jew.

Fischer had an IQ somewhere between 180 and 187 – the kikes weren’t fooling him.

Some people are saying Trump was a shill all along, some people are saying he is making bad decisions due to being surrounded by Jews, some people are saying he’s being blackmailed.

It doesn’t really matter what led us to this place, what matters is that we are in this place.

And this place that we are in is looking worse by the second.

The place that we are in is a place where we appear to be on a collision course for World War Three because of some idiotic fake gas attack.

Some Trump loyalists are claiming that the attack on Syria was all part of a chess game.

I’m willing to hear people out on their chess theories, but at this point, from where I’m sitting, it would be irresponsible to take these theories very seriously.

We need to assume that this is all exactly what it looks like, and call for immediate deescalation of US aggression against Syria and Russia.

Watching Randhawa and Tillerson on TV today has certainly done nothing to assuage fears that we are dealing with the worst conceivable scenario.

We are going to know a lot more about what is going on tomorrow and the next day, and in a week we’ll pretty much know for sure what the deal is, but let’s weigh the potential outcomes that we can see right now.

Basically, everything is based on the relative power in the administration of Kushner vs that of Bannon.

Best Case: Kushner Goes, Bannon Stays

This scenario would involve deescalation of the Syrian provocation, making nice with Russia. Probably there would be no admission of wrong-doing, and we certainly wouldn’t ever fully regain trust in Trump, but there would still be room to salvage his Presidency, to get some good out of it.

Unfortunately, this scenario is extremely unlikely.

Medium Case: Kushner and Bannon Stay

If both Kushner and Bannon stay on, we’ll have more of this back and forth, with some good and some bad happening. Probably, we would be left with simmering tensions with Russia, but not any further escalation. Bannon will be able to try to push through some of the domestic stuff we want, while Kushner will be slowed in trying to put boots on the ground in Syria.

This scenario is somewhat likely, but is really just kicking the can down the road – Bannon and Kushner’s agendas are mutually exclusive, and ultimately, one or the other is going to have to go.

Worst Case: Kushner Stays, Bannon Goes

If Bannon is fired or resigns, then you can pretty much assume that all of the worst imaginable things are going to begin happening. At least on the foreign policy front – there will be a few domestic victories to keep some portion of the base in line (though I don’t really know how much – Kushner is pro-amnesty and pro-free trade globalism).

We will end up in a direct confrontation with Russia in Syria, we will then escalate things in the Ukraine and elsewhere in Eastern Europe, and probably end up in an open shooting war with Russia and presumably nuclear weapons will be deployed at some point.

On April 9, 2017 at 1:57 PM, this is the most likely scenario.

This is All Happening Very Fast

A few days ago, I would never have imagined that I would be writing that the most likely scenario at present is that President Donald Trump will start a World War with Russia over a fake gas attack.

But again, I have a duty to be as objective as I can be here, and right now you have a rocket-propelled drive towards escalating Syria into a nightmare situation.

Saying “oh this will probably just go away” doesn’t make any sense. It might go away. Trump might decide to fire Kushner tomorrow, reinstate Bannon as the lead ideological figure in the administration, explain away the Syria strike as a one-off thing that was just “blah blah blah, can’t use chemical weapons,” and bring us back around to where we were last week.

But right now, there is nothing to indicate that is going to happen. And I can’t really see why he would do something so extreme as attack Assad if indeed he was not ready to go further (again – the “oh he just needed to do it to get the media and the liberals and cucks off his back” explanations could be correct – I don’t know – but I think assuming they are correct when there is no actual evidence that what is happening is anything other than what it looks like is irresponsible).

What to Do?

The first thing we need to do is not mope around and pity ourselves. We voted for an agenda that was a real agenda, and it is now looking like that agenda won’t happen. Yes, we poured our hearts and souls into it, and yes, this is sad. But that’s life. We have to keep going forward.

The second thing we need to do is stop arguing and insulting one another.

The third thing we need to do is stop saying “SEE I TOLD YOU TRUMP WAS A SHILL ALL ALONG IT WAS ALL A SCAM WE’VE BEEN HAD!!!!1111” This could actually be true (I don’t really think it is), but it doesn’t matter either way, and sulking around with that sort of “IT’S TOTAL DOOM” attitude isn’t ever going to help anything.

The fourth and most important thing is to start meming against this war.

Our memes are powerful. We have the ability to influence public thought. Right now, claiming that Trump was always part of some diabolical plan by Jews is not a helpful meme. The helpful meme is that he is being influenced by bad forces, in particular Jared Kushner, and he needs to be put back on the right track. Whatever you personally believe, that is the message that is going to resonate with the majority of Trump supporters, those who have the ability to influence his behavior.

The Bannon plan is correct: he is never going to get any real support or even much tacit approval from Democrats, so the most important thing for him is to keep the base. The base is already crumbling after the Syria attack, and it needs to be made clear that the further he goes with this, the further his base will disintegrate.

The Alt-Right is now an anti-war movement. This may well become our defining characteristic for a long time to come.

So get used to that.

Seriously, Don’t Mope

This is weird.

It’s all very, very weird.

To me, it still doesn’t feel quite real.

But it is real. This is what is happening. And we need to deal with it, to man-up, to keep going.

Nothing about our agenda has changed. Nothing about our agenda was ever dependent on Trump. Our agenda exists independently of Trump and it always did. The Trump phenomena helped our movement. Breaking from Trump, our movement is much, much stronger than it was when we began supporting Trump. That is the fact.

We have lost nothing.

We have potentially lost the chance to gain some things, but we didn’t actually ever have those things, so we couldn’t lose them.

We had a vision of how we hoped things would go, now they’re not going that way, so we’re going to do something different. That’s all. We as a movement are stronger than we’ve ever been, and we will continue to gain strength as an anti-war opposition movement.

Our ideas are the only powerful ideas which exist anymore. That is why Trump gained power from using our ideas. But when Trump stops using our ideas, these ideas do not somehow become less powerful. We can take anything the system throws at us and use it to gain more power and influence over the minds of the people.

Chin up, lads.

Because regardless of whatever the hell is going on with Trump, we are playing chess.

Hail Victory.

I be chessin’ out here!

Did you know that the hottest new chess prodigy making waves world-wide is actually an evolutionary dead-end from Uganda?

Weird, isn’t it?

Disney has even made a movie about it!

Looks like it’s going to be very inspirational.

Just one little problem though: the she-boon isn’t actually good at chess.

Of course, that’s a minor detail for Hollywood and the media.

Information Liberation:

The wider media has been quick to herald Phiona Mutesi a chess “prodigy.” She certainly faced odds, too: Born into poverty in Uganda, a young girl, learning and then competing in the world’s most competitive and ubiquitous board game. What are the odds? It’s a heart warming, underdog story. It even inspired a movie.

The only problem is it’s not really true.

What? You’re saying this majestic creature can’t be a chess genius?

The Disney movie “Queen of Katwe,” set for U.S. release Sept. 30, describes Mutesi’s meteoric rise from despair in the slums just outside Uganda’s capital to an international figure of prominence, indeed even a “Woman Candidate Master,” (WCM) on the chess scene. But the mythology surrounding her actual performance has reached such heights that chess grandmasters are coming out to weigh in.

So beautiful. I cry evertiem.

They tell The Daily Caller News Foundation her chess performance is no better than an average club player, and that the award is essentially little more than symbolism.

As one grandmaster noted bluntly, “Let me not mince words: by a purely objective standard, Phiona is not a strong chess player; she is equivalent to a weak-to-average club player (class C or B in the U.S.).”

Let me get this straight: they made a crap-tier chess player a celebrity because she’s a google – and a woman.

Surely you jest.

By 2012, the World Chess Federation (FIDE) awarded Mutesi the WCM, the lowest-ranked title, following her performance in the 40th Chess Olympiad in Istanbul. Normally, the WCM title requires that recipients reach—at least once in their career—a rating of 2000, according to the FIDE title handbook.

Her Elo rating at the time was 1686, a massive gap from the required 2000, but it seems as though FIDE officials granted her the title based on her performance at Istanbul.

Wow, these chess geeks even have power levels, like in Dragon Ball.

It’s under 9000! Way, way below 9000!

And yet, in spite of these autistically precise measurement methods for a chess player’s ability, the media has managed to completely misrepresent this dindu’s worth.

Newsweek, the Associated Press and The Daily Beast all referred to her as a “chess prodigy.” The L.A. Weekly goes so far as to title its piece, “A Ugandan Grandmaster Emerges in Mira Nair’s Disney Charmer Queen of Katwe,” and says she exhibits the signs of a “budding grandmaster.”

Vogue describes her as an “international chess master.” Consequence of Sound states in a review of the movie, “At first Phiona seems like a slow learner, but over time she reveals the makings of another Bobby Fischer.”

LOL!

Bobby Fischer is an interesting character. If you scrape the annals of history for a “good Jew,” this might be the only example you could come up with.

He was a chess genius.

And he really, really hated the skypes.

Here are choice quotes:

He wasn’t called a genius for nothing!

Fischer single-handedly set the standard for being considered a “good Jew”; he denied the holocaust, revealed all Jews being liars and thieves, and called for their collective annihilation.

I sure hope this Ugandan google shows “the makings of a new Bobby Fischer!”

If so, she’ll start calling for the mass-sterilization of Blacks in Africa.

As far as I know, however, this hasn’t happened yet. So I don’t know what they’re on about.

If this “Phiona” pulls a Bobby Fischer, though, I’ll endorse her as queen of Africa.

Not holding my breath.

Bobby was one of the few Jews who actually calls out his own satanic brethren. Not many of these Jews exist, but they are out there and are hated by their own for telling the truth.

He certainly paid the price for standing up against these Jews.