Andrew Anglin said long before the war started that the US would do false flags and all kinds of terrorism.

They have been doing that, but it’s been on a relatively small scale, aside from the bridge bombing terrorist attack. Most of the false flags are big in the media for a day or two, then when people start to ask questions, the media quickly moves on.

RT:

The US is preparing to stage false flag chemical attacks in Ukraine to pin the blame on Moscow for the use of banned toxic agents, the chief of Russia’s Nuclear Biological and Chemical Defense troops, Igor Kirillov, has said.

The Americans believe that the international community wouldn’t be able to organize an effective investigation of such “provocations” due to the fighting between Russian and Ukrainian forces, which would allow Washington to escape responsibility, Kirillov said during a briefing on Tuesday.

They couldn’t even investigate it when the US blew up pipes in Scandinavia.

More accurately, the US wouldn’t investigate it and ordered their European subordinates not to investigate it.

Russia’s Defense Ministry has obtained information that a train with a cargo of chemical substances in one of its cars had apparently arrived in the Ukrainian-controlled city of Kramatorsk in Donbass on February 10, the commander said.

The 16 metal boxes with special markings that suggest they contained BZ (3-Quinuclidinyl benzilate) incapacitating agent as well as CS (chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile) and CR (dibenzoxazepine) harassing ‘riot-control’ agents, were accompanied by the “citizens of foreign nations,” he also alleged.

According to Kirillov, the chemicals were unloaded at a local metallurgical plant under the supervision of Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) and put on US-supplied armored vehicles that later moved out towards a contact as part of a convoy.

Russia also established that eleven cars with specially marked shrapnel ammunition were unloaded in Kramatorsk on February 19, the commander said. The shells of this type had been previously upgraded in the US to be able to deliver harassing chemical substances, he added.

NATO has also planned a large delivery of means of chemical protection to Ukraine, including hundreds of antidotes for various toxic substances, Kirillov is also alleging.

“The facts of simultaneous delivery of toxic chemicals and means of protection against them indicate an attempt to carry out large-scale provocations using the BZ military-grade psychoactive chemical agent during the conflict,” he said.

A lot of people say things like “both sides lie,” but the reality is, Russia has yet to be caught in any lies. There is literally not one lie Russia has been caught telling throughout the war. Maybe they are lying and just never getting caught, but it would be extraordinary if the US intelligence agencies were totally incapable of catching their lies, while the US is being constantly caught in various lies by randos on the internet.

Therefore, I see no reason to doubt them when they come out with information like this.

Related: Hersh Says America Blew the Pipes to Back Germany Into a Corner

The real war crimes in the Ukraine were committed by Ukrainians against other Ukrainians.

Russia has been saying for a while that the Ukies are planning a false flag chemical weapons attack. In fact, the US State Department was suggesting something like this (in the reverse) before the invasion even happened.

It seems pretty likely, the more desperate the Ukies get.

RT:

Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) is plotting “another provocation with the use of hazardous chemicals” as part of Kiev’s smear campaign against Moscow, Russia’s Ministry of Defense claimed on Wednesday, amid the ongoing military offensive in the neighboring country.

Speaking at a briefing, the head of the National Defense Control Center of Russia, Colonel-General Mikhail Mizintsev said that the incident allegedly being planned is set to take place in the city of Sumy in northeastern Ukraine. He claimed that Ukrainian territorial defense units have already been provided with protective hazmat suits and are now participating in training within a chemical attack scenario.

“According to the plan of the Kiev scriptwriters,” Mizintsev claimed, “units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will launch artillery strikes on the border regions of Russia from the settlements of the Sumy region. After a staged retaliatory fire attack, allegedly carried out by the Russian armed forces, Ukrainian special services plan to spray potent poisonous substances in the provocation area.”

After the staged incident is recorded by experts from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, it will be “used to subsequently accuse the Russian armed forces of using chemical weapons against civilians,” the chief of the National Defense Control Center said, citing “available reliable information” obtained by the Russian military.

Kiev has not yet commented on the allegations.

Mizintsev stressed that Russian forces do not use chemical weapons and that the country’s stockpiles have been destroyed in accordance with international agreements.

Since the launch of the Russian attack on Ukraine in late February Moscow and Kiev have repeatedly accused each other of various war crimes, each in turn then denying any culpability. Russia has repeatedly warned of possible chemical attacks by the SBU. In April it also accused the US of planning to use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Ukraine in order to frame Moscow. Kiev and its Western supporters have been denying these accusations.

As far as anyone is able to tell, every single “war crime” has been committed by the Ukrainians. Some of them out in the open, in the case of the post-tapings and public whippings of random civilians (rounding up civilians and torturing them is a war crime), but the bigger ones were staged as false flags – the Mariupol theatre bombing, the Bucha Massacre, the missile attack on the Donbass train station.

They did these things when they were not losing nearly as badly as they are now, and the entire Western media covered them up. So, it seems pretty likely they’re going to do something even bigger now, and try to rally countries like India against China, while also potentially justifying a NATO/US invasion of the Ukraine.

It is mind-boggling to imagine that there are people who hear Joe Biden saying “Russia is planning a chemical attack” and don’t immediately think “the US is planning a false flag chemical attack.”

Is there anything more obvious than this?

I guess if you’re a vaxed government/media believer, you just don’t have the ability to process information at all, and your entire thought process is just pumped into your brain. But surely, every single person with the ability to think at all sees what’s happening here.

The Guardian:

Russia’s false accusation that Ukraine has biological and chemical weapons is a “clear sign” that a desperate Vladimir Putin is considering using them himself, Joe Biden has said.

The US president said Putin’s “back is against the wall and now he’s talking about new false flags he’s setting up including, asserting that we in America have biological as well as chemical weapons in Europe – simply not true. I guarantee you,” Biden said at an event on Monday.

“They are also suggesting that Ukraine has biological and chemical weapons in Ukraine. That’s a clear sign he’s considering using both of those. He’s already used chemical weapons in the past, and we should be careful of what’s about to come.”

Putin “knows there’ll be severe consequences because of the united Nato front,” he said, without specifying what actions the alliance would take.

The remarks echo previous comments by officials in Washington and allied countries, who have accused Russia of spreading an unproven claim that Ukraine had a biological weapons program as a possible prelude to potentially launching its own biological or chemical attacks.

I’ve been watching the Grey Zone YouTube channel. I’m not sure how long it will still be up. (Most leftists still haven’t figured out that censorship is coming for them. Someone needs to tell them to start migrating their audiences to the alternative platforms, because there is clearly a mandate against any truth about the Ukraine “war” on all big social media.)

We recently posted the Grey Zone interview with Douglas MacGregor, which I will continue to recommend.

This week, Aaron Mate interviewed Chas Freeman, who is another mainstream government figure who is talking basic common sense and is therefore banned from the entire mainstream media.

Freeman was a high-ranking diplomat who served in the Foreign Service, State and Defense departments. He was also a member of the Atlantic Council. You can read his Wiki. He’s not nobody.

Anyway, he had a few cold takes, just as you’ll get out of any boomer if you talk to them for an entire hour (“Putin might have underestimated…”), but for the most part he agreed with everything you read on this website.

Most telling, is that he said very plainly and matter of factly – also casually – that it looks like the US is setting up a false flag chemical weapons attack.

Anyway, the full interview may or may not be worth your time, but I find it interesting that there is this entire body of mainstream boomers that are saying everything I’m saying and the media is simply not acknowledging that they exist.

The “Putin is losing the war and now he’s desperate” narrative is just so insane that it’s incomprehensible. But I guess we already know it’s the same people who believe in the virus/vax that believe in this moronic hoax.

It’s truly Zombie World.

Daily reminder: you can watch YouTube at double speed, which makes it a lot easier to listen to a boomer talk.

Technology minister Chris Philp MP says what Russia is doing is "totally barbaric" and the UK is determined to 'do everything it can to stop them'. https://t.co/X3flQUBL0r

📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube pic.twitter.com/buHdfexzlV

— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 11, 2022

"The use of chemical weapons where there are large numbers of civilians would be an outrage against humanity."

Technology minister, Chris Philp, sends a stark warning to Russia not to use chemical weapons. pic.twitter.com/UayhrPVdCO

— Times Radio (@TimesRadio) March 11, 2022

Boris Johnson warns Putin may resort to chemical weapons in Ukraine pic.twitter.com/zCuJCMS4sG

— The Independent (@Independent) March 11, 2022

It’s all mind games, bro.

You can’t outsmart these Russians.

The Guardian:

Russia can expect a “dramatic increased response” from the west if Vladimir Putin uses chemical weapons in Ukraine, a minister has said, amid fears that a false pretext is being laid by Moscow for such an attack.

Chris Philp, the technology minister, accused Russia of sharing disinformation online to create a false narrative that Ukraine is preparing to use chemical weapons, so that Russia can launch its own chemical attack.

His comments echo those made on Thursday by Boris Johnson, who said he feared that the “barbaric” regime in the Kremlin may be ready to use the banned weapons as the invading Russian forces had failed to make the progress expected.

Putin is prioritizing not harming civilians. Russia is a big country with a big army.

Philp told Sky News: “We have seen in the last 24 or 48 hours what appear to be bits of disinformation published by Russian state outlets, including in fact the Russian embassy here in London, putting on things like Twitter information that appear to be creating a false narrative that Ukrainians are considering using chemical weapons, which is clearly ridiculous and totally untrue.

“Sometimes they do that in preparation but I hope that’s not what they’re contemplating. The use of chemical weapons in any theatre of war, certainly one where there are lots of civilians, is totally unacceptable.”

Philp said any such use of weapons would “trigger an increased response from the west”.

If anyone was going to use chemical weapons, you’d think it would be the side that’s more desperate and hopeless.

Johnson and the foreign secretary, Liz Truss, have raised fears of the use of chemical weapons by Russian forces, while the White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, said the world should be “on the lookout” for the Russian use of chemical and biological weaponry.

Johnson said on Thursday: “The stuff which you are hearing about chemical weapons is straight out of the Russian playbook. They start saying that there are chemical weapons that are being stored by their opponents or by the Americans, so that when they themselves deploy chemical weapons – as I fear they may – they have a sort of a maskirovka, a fake story, ready to go.”

In a reference to the Salisbury nerve agent attack, he added: “You have seen it in Syria, you saw it even in the UK. I just note that is what they are already doing. It is a cynical, barbaric government, I’m afraid.”

You’ve gotta wonder what is going on with all of this chemical weapons talk.

Why did Vicki even say it in the first place?

I don’t know what possessed this guy to come forward and admit the truth, but it was very good of him to do so.

RT:

A BBC producer believes that scenes from a hospital in Syria’s Douma, which ignited a media frenzy in 2018 after showing children allegedly suffering from chemicals, were staged. But he says Assad did attack the town.

Emotive scenes of Syrian civilians, among them crying, choking, half-naked children, dominated the airwaves in April last year after rebel-affiliated mouthpieces reported yet another “chemical attack by the Assad regime” in the town of Douma. Disturbing reports, including some from the controversial White Helmets, claimed scores of people had been killed and injured.

Mainstream media quickly picked up the horrific (but unverified) videos from a Douma hospital, where victims were treated after this “poison attack.” That hospital scene was enough to assemble a UN emergency session and prompt the US-led ‘coalition of the willing’ to rain down dozens of missiles on Damascus and other locations. 

That was one of Ivanka’s finer moments if you remember.

She convinced her Boomer father to bomb the evil monster Assad because of “muh gassed babies.”

And she would have gotten away with it too, if it weren’t for those meddling Russians and their anti-missile systems.

Well, it turns out that Assad and the Russians were telling the truth all along and that the West and the Jews (but I repeat myself) were lying.

But Riam Dalati, a reputable BBC producer who has long reported from the Middle East, took the liberty of trying to sift through the fog of the Syrian war.

He believes Assad forces did attack the town, but that the much-publicized hospital scenes were staged.

“After almost 6 months of investigations, I can prove without a doubt that the Douma Hospital scene was staged. No fatalities occurred in the hospital.”

Anticipating further queries, he said no one from the White Helmets or opposition sources were present in Douma by the time the alleged attack had happened except for one person who was in Damascus.

The Russian Ministry of Defense is running a victory lap over this and also worried that something might happen to Riam for being so candid.

They’re saying that he’s going to be in deep shit for suddenly developing a conscience.

In all, Dalati is not a lone voice in the wilderness. The Intercept has recently run a story that also cast doubt on the mainstream coverage of Douma, although it doesn’t doubt that the attack itself happened. While a veteran British reporter Robert Fisk suggested there was no gas attack at all, saying people there were suffering from oxygen starvation. Witnesses of the “chemical attack,” for their part, told international investigators the story was a set-up.

Moscow, which supports Damascus in its fight against terrorists, has long stated the Douma incident was staged, calling for an international OPCW inquiry. Last year, the Defense Ministry presented what it said was proof the “provocation” was to trigger Western airstrikes against Syrian government forces.

…

Now the Foreign Ministry has suggested Dalati is being silenced for voicing inconvenient views, with spokeswoman Maria Zakharova asking on Facebook: “A telling story. How about Western advocates of rights and freedoms? Had they accused BBC of censorship and pressuring the journalist?”

Yes, please. More of this. Russia on the offensive in the information war, driving home their version of events and pulling a “ha-ha!” on their enemies. A sight for sore eyes, indeed.

I can just imagine how the higher-ups in the UK are seething over this news.

Soon, information will come out about how they pulled off the fake Salisbury chemical attack as well and tried to pin it on Russia.

But it won’t change anything.

At this point, the mask has come off and the governments in the West don’t even pretend to be motivated by anything other than Jew gold and hatred for White people. Even if the public finds out that they’ve been pulling false flag attacks to advance the agenda of the Jews, it will simply be too little too late – and no one will care, anyway.

The elite and all the institutions in the UK are just as compromised as in the US.

I think we all had hope that there were some of /ourguys/ hidden away in the Deep State. An old guard or something, waiting to spring into action and save the day once they knew that the will of the people was with them.

But this hope has proven to be unfounded for the most part.

Q Anon tall-tales about secret Patriot conspiracies to overthrow the Deep State have been utterly debunked at this point. Brexit is a farce. And no military/fireman/police/patriot coup has occurred in France in response to the Yellow Vests.

Time to wake up from these pleasant fantasies, frens. 

Furthermore, most Ukistanis are already sold on the idea of the Forever War with Russia.

So it seems that it’s only a matter of time at this point before someone starts lobbing missiles.

Does she ever take a break?

RT:

Any attack on Syria’s Idlib province is going to be “dealt with,” US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley warned, as Washington seeks to stop the Russian-backed Syrian army from retaking the last remaining jihadist stronghold.

The US has struck Syria twice after claims of chemical weapons use by the government in Damascus, Haley said on Wednesday in a Fox News interview.

“Don’t test us again,” she said, addressing the Syrian government and its allies Russia and Iran.

Us???

Does she mean India???

Every day that we are represented by this insufferable mystery meat slut in the UN is an affront to Dalai Lama-fearing Buddhist White men such as myself.

Washington and its allies have also warned Syria that they will act not just in case of chemical weapons being used, but against any attack on the province, the US envoy to the UN said.

“Any offensive on the civilian people in Idlib was going to be dealt with,” Haley told Fox News’ Bret Baier.

Who gon’ deal with it?

You?

Nah. You’re gonna send the Fascists in to deal with it aren’t you? The white men that you hate so much.

It’s madness.

Letting this barking mad bitch run around on the world stage, letting her yap her puckered little head off and try to provoke everybody. All the while, she knows that her man – the United States military – got dis ho’s back. Even though, she a lying, cheating, manipulative ho. Sleeping around with the Israelis, mostly.

Her master needs to put a choker on her. Talking smack like this at the UN. Who dis bitch think she is???

Trump. Dawg. You listening?

Get. Her. In. Line.

Wow, look at that. The hoax was a hoax.

One of the supposedly gassed Syrian children is seen here being interviewed by RT correspondents. The kid claims he was just sitting in his house when people called out that he and several other people had to go to the nearby hospital.

When he did, White Helmets started spraying water on him yelling about chemicals. After they were done spraying, they were given a date and a cookie.

Pretty good deal if you ask me, when I was a kid I would willingly get sprayed with water for a few minutes for a homemade oatmeal cookie.

The regular hospital staff also spoke with RT and claimed they had not seen any victims of a chemical attack. They also said that if there was one nearby, they would have been hit by it themselves.

The only thing that they claimed happened more often that day was people coming in complaining of difficulty breathing, however that is likely just because of an increase of dust and debris in an area after an explosion.

UPDATE: Looks like we might actually be going to war after all.

Russia, unsurprisingly, vetoed the US’ anti-Syria thing at the UN Security Council.

Now we’re talking about inspectors.

NPR:

At a U.N. Security Council meeting Tuesday, Russia has vetoed a resolution on Syria drafted by the United States on the latest apparent chemical weapons attack, at a time when President Trump is considering launching new military action.

Meanwhile, inspectors from the international chemical weapons watchdog prepare to head into the country.

…

Trump has now cancelled this week’s planned trip to Latin America “to oversee the American response to Syria and to monitor developments around the world,” according to White House press secretary Sarah Sanders.

As NPR’s Michele Kelemen reports, the U.S.-drafted resolution would have demanded access to the scene of the reported attack in Douma, a rebel-held area in the Damascus suburbs, and “would also create a new investigative mechanism to look into chemical weapons attacks in Syria and determine who is responsible.”

Conversely, the US vetoed Russia’s plan to use the UN as the inspectors.

But, yeah, okay.

Send the inspectors.

But we want a whole bunch of international inspectors, not just US ones.

And it looks like that’s what we’re going to get. This is going to end up with a UN deal with Europeans involved.

And remember that with Iraq, the Europeans went in and did an honest assessment and found that Saddam didn’t have any WMD and the Bush Team was just like “yeah whatever fuck you we’re doing this anyway.”

But Trump isn’t Bush.

The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said the Syrian government and its Russian allies invited it to send in a fact-finding mission. The watchdog group has a mandate to “establish facts surrounding the allegations of the use of toxic chemicals, reportedly chlorine, for hostile purposes in the Syrian Arab Republic.”

It’s not clear how the OPCW inspection in Syria would impact the timing of potential U.S. military action.

So this is an out. Right here.

Trump can say “we’re waiting for the inspectors.”

These UN teams are nowhere near as kiked as the US military, and Europeans generally are not going to buy this entire narrative that the US is trying to form that Assad – days after Trump said he’s pulling out – decided to just gas a bunch of people for no reason.

It’s too stupid.

I love my country and believe it is the best country, but the very sad fact is that Americans are the only people stupid and/or brainwashed enough to believe that sort of a narrative.

The other narrative that only Americans could believe is that toppling Assad in order to support a gang of ultra-crazy genocidal terrorists taking over the country is “helping the Syrian people.”

This “human rights” narrative Nimrata Randhawa just tried to sell us.

CNN:

“When the people of Douma, along with the rest of the international community, looked to this council to act, one country stood in the way. History will record that,” US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley said. “History will record that on this day, Russia chose protecting a monster over the lives of the Syrian people.”

“Russia has trashed the credibility of the council,” she added.

…

While Haley and Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia were seen greeting each other with handshakes and kisses on the cheek prior to the meeting, the mood quickly changed as the diplomats hurled accusations at each other.

Prior to vetoing the US draft, Nebenzia said that by putting the resolution forward for a vote “the delegation of the United States is once again trying to mislead the international community and making yet one more step toward confrontation.”

On Monday, Haley told the Security Council that the US will respond to the Assad regime’s alleged chemical attack against Syrian civilians as she excoriated Russia, saying its hands are “covered in the blood of Syrian children.”

“Chemical weapons have once again been used on Syrian men, women and children,” Haley said at Monday’s meeting to discuss what appeared to be a chemical attack on Douma, the last rebel-held town in Syria, on Saturday that left 49 people dead and scores injured.

“History will record this as the moment when the Security Council either discharged its duty or demonstrated its utter and complete failure to protect the people of Syria,” Haley said. “Either way, the United States will respond.”

And honestly, I don’t even think Americans are buying this “SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!111” bullshit at this point.

We have been run into the ground with this idiotic narrative of everything the ZOG machine does is somehow intended to help people out of altruism.

This whole idea of getting involved in other people’s business in order to help strangers is stupid in the first place, and only exists as an excuse to make money or bomb people for the Jews.

Basically, America was doing all this weird exploitative shit across the entire planet, and they had to come up with some kind of an explanation for why they were doing it, so they were just like “oh, well, we just want to help people.”

You get this from people – in particular women – who are talking about what they want to do in their future. They’ll say “oh, I want to help people.” And it’s like, “what, you mean like, strangers? why? what kind of a goal is it to help strangers? what purpose?”

If you ask someone that they’ll just look at you blankly, because they don’t have any idea why they would want to help random strangers, it’s just an idea that’s been put in their head by this American international capitalist/military industrial complex system. This idea that it is a morally righteous value to just go out and find random strangers to help for no reason.

So, “we’re going to bomb this country, invade, kill hundreds of thousands of people because we want to help them, and because we love helping children” is something these people think they can just pass off without anyone blinking.

But in the last 15 years, the internet has really changed the way this stuff works. And people are harder now. The boomers are older, and those of us who were teenagers or kids in the 00s when Bush was doing this shit are older, and the world is just different.

If there is some kind of missile strike like there was last April, I think that will be it. They are not putting together a narrative here that is sellable, and Trump was able to delay it. Now we’ve got these inspectors going in, so I don’t even think there’s going to be a strike.

What Trump needs to realize is that no one cares about this “SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!111” bullshit. He is still in the mindset that this is something that sways people and it just doesn’t. Some people might do it for signaling purposes, but then it’s like, “oh so you want to start a war because that is the most moral thing here?” and they will back down.

Bigger False Flag Coming?

If this chemical gas thing fails again – and it looks now like it’s going to fail again – then what happens next?

These Jews are foaming at the friggin mouth for a war with Russia, and the situation with Iran in Syria makes the need for it immediate.

So is there something bigger coming?

The Skripal hoax was pretty big. And that’s now fallen apart too.

I think they’re going to do something bigger next time. Maybe soon.

Trump needs to start calling this stuff out instead of just trying to dodge it. Because they’re not going to stop throwing it at him, and eventually something is going to stick.

He needs to understand that no one cares about Russia. None of his people do. I don’t even think the liberals do, and only talk about it in so much as they think it hurts Trump.

A false flag that was out of hand, involving American deaths, would put him in a very rough position if he hadn’t preempted it.

And let’s be honest here – the guy’s not stupid. He can watch Tucker Carlson like the rest of us. He doesn’t believe this shit. He just feels he’s got so much pressure on him to go along with it, that he has to take the narrative as it comes and then just try to dodge the Jew attempts to push him into a mess.

That might work this time, but it isn’t going to work forever.

He needs to aggressively take control of the situation and put forward his own narrative. He has no other choice.

By the way: don’t stop calling.

Tucker Carlson’s opening monologue on Syria last night was absolutely amazing.

I think that part of that was basically just reading directly from my articles.

All of our talking points:

• Total bipartisan support for war
• No one knows what happened
• Why would Assad do this?
• Same story as last April – which turned out to be a hoax
• Even if it was real – what does that have to do with us? Is it worth a war?
• No one cares about humanitarian crisis in Libya
• “Moderate rebels” are actually ISIS terrorists
• Why are we funding terrorists?
• Trump campaigned on being against this

He is the only person on television saying this, and he is absolutely lucid.

I’m surprised they didn’t cut his mic.

He could have dropped the mic after that bit, but instead he kept going.

After that monologue, he interviewed a Senator from Mississippi, and I kid you not, Tucker opened up with asking him how a war in Syria would make us safer and the first words out of this guy’s mouth were “well, if you care about Israel…”

Real thing. Like Daily Stormer satire. Watch it.

He then went on to make no sense at all.

When asked about why we should be fighting Assad, he just kept talking about ISIS, and when Tucker brought up the fact that Assad is fighting ISIS, he said “oh well, it’s complicated.”

He never gave any kind of coherent answer to anything.

It is absolutely insane that this is a US Senator demanding a war that will cost trillions of dollars and untold numbers of American lives and he can’t even give a basic explanation of why he wants to do it.

Because look – what does Israel even have to do with any of this? They’re saying we have to go to war because of a humanitarian crisis with chemical gas – how does that even relate to Israel?

All of this is Bush-era evangelical Christian “war to bring about the Biblical apocalypse” talking points, mixed in with Obama-era “humanitarian intervention” talking points, creating a nonsensical word-soup of confusing gibberish.

These people genuinely believe they can just roll out these emotional talking points – using every available media platform – and get us to go fight a war where the only real purpose is to create chaos in the Middle East because that ostensibly benefits Israel.

Thank God for Tucker.

At least he is getting the reality out there to the people, on the most watched news show on television.

We have a chance to stop this.

CALL THE WHITE HOUSE AND WRITE AN EMAIL. MENTION THIS TUCKER CARLSON SHOW. TELL THEM TRUMP NEEDS TO WATCH IT. 

Okay, so someone just told me that I should stop using the term “hoax” when talking about the alleged chemical attack in Syria, as it sounds like I’m saying it didn’t happen at all.

When I say “this is a hoax,” I refer to two separate possibilities:

1. It was a real attack done by ZOG-backed terrorists in Syria to blame on as Assad, or
2. It didn’t even happen at all, and it was just filmed by actors

I think both are distinct possibilities, and both would qualify under the term “hoax.”

Option #1 is probably the more likely option.

However, the UN is now saying that option #2 is a possibility, as they have no way to confirm that it actually even happened.

RT:

While the West, and the US in particular, rush to accuse the Syrian government of an alleged chemical attack in the rebel-held town of Douma, the UN has admitted that it is unable to “independently verify the allegations.”

“We’re not in a position at this point to independently verify the allegations [about the alleged chemical attack in Douma], but, obviously, any allegation of continued use of chemical weapons is extremely, extremely troubling,” Stephane Dujarric, the spokesman for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, said in a statement on Monday evening.

On Saturday, several rebel-linked activists, including the controversial White Helmets group, accused the Syrian government of carrying out a chemical attack that allegedly affected dozens of civilians in the town of Douma in Eastern Ghouta, some 10km from Damascus.

The White Helmets are ISIS-linked and backed by Israel – that’s why they’re controversial. There are a lot of pictures and video of them working with ISIS, as well as evidence that they are themselves actually members of ISIS.

The West swiftly reacted to the report with pointing the finger at Damascus and Moscow. US President Donald Trump hastily called the alleged incident a “humanitarian disaster for no reason whatsoever,” warning that a “big price” would be paid.

US envoy to the UN Nikki Haley considers the alleged chemical attack in the enclave as a proven fact, and blames Russian “obstructionism” and the “monster” Bashar Assad for the incident. The US envoy stressed that if the UN refuses to follow the US lead and intervene in Syria due to “Russia’s obstructionism,” Washington would respond alone.

On Monday, the US president also promised to decide on potential actions against Syria within 24-48 hours, adding that “nothing is off the table.”

“We have a lot of options militarily, and we’ll be letting you know pretty soon,” Trump said at a meeting with military commanders.

Syria and Russia have dismissed all accusations, calling the reports merely fake news that is aimed solely at helping terrorists and justifying potential strikes against Syrian government forces. Moscow noted that it had repeatedly warned about false-flag attacks being prepared in recent months.

I don’t know if Russia is saying it is a fake event or a false flag.

I think they’re where I am – it could be either.

There is video of the alleged event.

But it could easily just be staged.

Or it could be real, but done by someone other than Assad.

What I will tell you once again is that there is absolutely zero reason that Assad would do this.

What I will also tell you once again is that even if he did do it, it is none of our business as Americans.