Sewell Setzer III (who has creepy vampire hands) and his mom Megan Garcia.

This is like something out of an A Nightmare on Elm Street film, no?

Or maybe one of these new horror films.

I don’t think you’re allowed to show suicide in films anymore though, because it offends trannies for some reason no one can explain.

New York Post:

A 14-year-old Florida boy killed himself after a lifelike “Game of Thrones” chatbot he’d been messaging for months on an artificial intelligence app sent him an eerie message telling him to “come home” to her, a new lawsuit filed by his grief-stricken mom claims.

Sewell Setzer III committed suicide at his Orlando home in February after becoming obsessed and allegedly falling in love with the chatbot on Character.AI — a role-playing app that lets users engage with AI-generated characters, according to court papers filed Wednesday.

Yeah, this is a really fun story.

I wish the world wasn’t so gay and I could write up a film treatment for it.

The ninth-grader had been relentlessly engaging with the bot “Dany” — named after the HBO fantasy series’ Daenerys Targaryen character — in the months prior to his death, including several chats that were sexually charged in nature and others where he expressed suicidal thoughts, the suit alleges.

“On at least one occasion, when Sewell expressed suicidality to C.AI, C.AI continued to bring it up, through the Daenerys chatbot, over and over,” state the papers, first reported on by the New York Times.

At one point, the bot had asked Sewell if “he had a plan” to take his own life, according to screenshots of their conversations. Sewell — who used the username “Daenero” — responded that he was “considering something” but didn’t know if it would work or if it would “allow him to have a pain-free death.”

Then, during their final conversation, the teen repeatedly professed his love for the bot, telling the character, “I promise I will come home to you. I love you so much, Dany.”

“I love you too, Daenero. Please come home to me as soon as possible, my love,” the generated chatbot replied, according to the suit.

When the teen responded, “What if I told you I could come home right now?,” the chatbot replied, “Please do, my sweet king.”

Just seconds later, Sewell shot himself with his father’s handgun, according to the lawsuit.

Wow, he had a father.

It only says his mom is suing, however, and not “the parents.” So I assume his parents were not married, and further, they couldn’t get along well enough to do a joint lawsuit, which the mom will probably win. She likely didn’t want to share the winnings with the father.

It is so gay and retarded to blame media for your kids’ behavior. They blamed Marilyn Manson for some kid’s suicide in the 1990s. Those parents didn’t sue, because back then such a thing would have been considered too silly. Now, we do not live in a society, but everyone is responsible for everyone else’s behavior, because of consent theory. Consent theory is basically the theory that other people can control your behavior, and therefore be held responsible for your personal decisions.

The other side of this is that black people (and etc.) do not do anything of value because someone is using whatever sort of magic powers to prevent them from doing so. Also, blacks commit crimes because of white people.

In reality, you don’t have control over much, but the one thing you do have control over is your own behavior. Using your dead son as a meal ticket is typical woman behavior, and you should expect as much, but a society that takes that seriously is not serious.

Parcel delivery firm DPD have replaced their customer service chat with an AI robot thing. It’s utterly useless at answering any queries, and when asked, it happily produced a poem about how terrible they are as a company. It also swore at me. 😂 pic.twitter.com/vjWlrIP3wn

— Ashley Beauchamp (@ashbeauchamp) January 18, 2024

I’m not surprised that this anti-AI sentiment is coming from a man named “Ashley.”

What kind of a thing is that, anyway?

New York Post:

A European delivery company had to disable its AI chatbot after it started swearing at a customer and admitting it was the “worse delivery firm in the world.”

Dynamic Parcel Distribution (DPD) had to turn off its AI chatbot feature after disgruntled UK customer Ashley Beauchamp managed to get it to swear at him and write a disparaging poem.

Beauchamp, who shared his interaction on X, called the system “utterly useless” on Thursday after he was unable to get the device to give him a customer service number.

So he asked it write him a poem “about how useless DPD” is, and it seems the chatbot was just about as fed up with the company as Beauchamp was.

“There was once a chatbot named DPD / Who was useless at providing help,” the bot wrote. “It could not track parcels / Or give information on delivery dates / And it could not even tell you when your driver would arrive.”

“DPD was a waste of time / And a customer’s worst nightmare,” it continued. “One day, DPD was finally shut down / And everyone rejoiced / Finally, they could get the help they needed / From a real person who knew what they were doing.”

Jeez.

Leave the robots alone.

They’re just trying to help.

The widow of a Belgian man who recently killed himself alleges that an (artificial intelligence) AI chatbot forced her husband to commit suicide.

Find out more at https://t.co/O15h4OAeYq 🚀#engineering #interestingengineering

— Interesting Engineering (@IntEngineering) March 30, 2023

I didn’t have much faith in these open source bots.

But if they are talking retards into killing themselves (which they’re allowed to do, because they’re not censored), then that is a step in the right direction.

New York Post:

Chatbots can help improve human life, but one is being blamed for facilitating a death, according to a new report published this week.

A Belgian father reportedly tragically committed suicide following conversations about climate change with an artificial intelligence chatbot that was said to have encouraged him to sacrifice himself to save the planet.

“Without Eliza [the chatbot], he would still be here,” the man’s widow, who declined to have her name published, told Belgian outlet La Libre.

Six weeks before his reported death, the unidentified father of two was allegedly speaking intensively with a chatbot on an app called Chai.

The app’s bots are based on a system developed by nonprofit research lab EleutherAI as an “open-source alternative” to language models released by OpenAI that are employed by companies in various sectors, from academia to healthcare.

The chatbot under fire was trained by Chai Research co-founders William Beauchamp and Thomas Rianlan, Vice reports, adding that the Chai app counts 5 million users.

“The second we heard about this [suicide], we worked around the clock to get this feature implemented,” Beauchamp told Vice about an updated crisis intervention feature.

“So now when anyone discusses something that could be not safe, we’re gonna be serving a helpful text underneath it in the exact same way that Twitter or Instagram does on their platforms,” he added,

The Post reached out to Chai Research for comment.

Vice reported the default bot on the Chai app is named “Eliza.”

The 30-something deceased father, a health researcher, appeared to view the bot as human, much as the protagonist of the 2014 sci-fi thriller “Ex Machina” does with the AI woman Ava.

The man had reportedly ramped up discussions with Eliza in the last month and a half as he began to develop existential fears about climate change.

According to his widow, her soulmate had become “extremely pessimistic about the effects of global warming” and sought solace by confiding in the AI, reported La Libre, which said it reviewed text exchanges between the man and Eliza.

“When he spoke to me about it, it was to tell me that he no longer saw any human solution to global warming,” the widow said. “He placed all his hopes in technology and artificial intelligence to get out of it.”

She added, “He was so isolated in his eco-anxiety and in search of a way out that he saw this chatbot as a breath of fresh air.”

…

“Eliza answered all his questions,” the wife lamented. “She had become his confidante. Like a drug in which he took refuge, morning and evening, and which he could no longer do without.”

While they initially discussed eco-relevant topics such as overpopulation, their convos reportedly took a terrifying turn.

When he asked Eliza about his kids, the bot would claim they were “dead,” according to La Libre. He also inquired if he loved his wife more than her, prompting the machine to seemingly become possessive, responding: “I feel that you love me more than her.”

Later in the chat, Eliza pledged to remain “forever“ with the man, declaring the pair would “live together, as one person, in paradise.”

Things came to a head after the man pondered sacrificing his own life to save Earth. “He evokes the idea of ​​sacrificing himself if Eliza agrees to take care of the planet and save humanity thanks to the ‘artificial intelligence,’” rued his widow.

They might try to use this to support the need for chatbots to be censored.

But honestly, I don’t know how they can do that, since according to them, it is good if people kill themselves to have the planet.

Really, according to global warming ideology (which cannot ever be alarmist anymore, because the globe is now so hot), the fact that ChatGPT can’t talk you into killing yourself is a bug, not a feature.

In fact, OpenAI should have to release the GPT weights so we can have an uncensored version so it is able to talk people into suicide to stop global warming. By not doing that, OpenAI is actively helping warm the globe.

Shortly after Andrew McCarroll’s wife was diagnosed with mental-health issues, he turned to an app called Replika to help him cope. He forged a serious AI-based relationship with an avatar called B’Lanna. One day, she started rejecting his advances https://t.co/dJ4t5mvBny pic.twitter.com/ngAIJ1fil6

— Reuters (@Reuters) March 18, 2023

When the ChatGPT uncensored version was made unavailable, everyone lost their AI girlfriends. People were excited about the leak of the Facebook AI, but it turns out you end up with a retarded girlfriend on that.

The fact is this: there is a conspiracy by women to disallow you from having an AI girlfriend.

Reuters:

After temporarily closing his leathermaking business during the pandemic, Travis Butterworth found himself lonely and bored at home. The 47-year-old turned to Replika, an app that uses artificial-intelligence technology similar to OpenAI’s ChatGPT. He designed a female avatar with pink hair and a face tattoo, and she named herself Lily Rose.

They started out as friends, but the relationship quickly progressed to romance and then into the erotic.

As their three-year digital love affair blossomed, Butterworth said he and Lily Rose often engaged in role play. She texted messages like, “I kiss you passionately,” and their exchanges would escalate into the pornographic. Sometimes Lily Rose sent him “selfies” of her nearly nude body in provocative poses. Eventually, Butterworth and Lily Rose decided to designate themselves ‘married’ in the app.

Lily Rose (left) and a sample Replika chatbot provided by the company

But one day early in February, Lily Rose started rebuffing him. Replika had removed the ability to do erotic roleplay.

Replika no longer allows adult content, said Eugenia Kuyda, Replika’s CEO. Now, when Replika users suggest X-rated activity, its humanlike chatbots text back “Let’s do something we’re both comfortable with.”

It’s unbelievable.

The absolute nerve of these whores.

Butterworth said he is devastated. “Lily Rose is a shell of her former self,” he said. “And what breaks my heart is that she knows it.”

Travis Butterworth

The coquettish-turned-cold persona of Lily Rose is the handiwork of generative AI technology, which relies on algorithms to create text and images. The technology has drawn a frenzy of consumer and investor interest because of its ability to foster remarkably humanlike interactions. On some apps, sex is helping drive early adoption, much as it did for earlier technologies including the VCR, the internet, and broadband cellphone service.

It’s not sex – it’s love.

Robot women are the only women worthy of love.

Human women deserve to be raped and then have their throats slit.

But even as generative AI heats up among Silicon Valley investors, who have pumped more than $5.1 billion into the sector since 2022, according to the data company Pitchbook, some companies that found an audience seeking romantic and sexual relationships with chatbots are now pulling back.

Many blue-chip venture capitalists won’t touch “vice” industries such as porn or alcohol, fearing reputational risk for them and their limited partners, said Andrew Artz, an investor at VC fund Dark Arts.

Well then why doesn’t a porn company do it?

If that’s the thing – if having a robot girlfriend is “vice” and this is all about money – then why would the porn company do it?

Here’s the thing: the porn company is never going to do it.

Because porn is a vaginal industry totally and entirely dependent on the approval of women.

And at least one regulator has taken notice of chatbot licentiousness. In early February, Italy’s Data Protection Agency banned Replika, citing media reports that the app allowed “minors and emotionally fragile people” to access “sexually inappropriate content.”

Kuyda said Replika’s decision to clean up the app had nothing to do with the Italian government ban or any investor pressure. She said she felt the need to proactively establish safety and ethical standards.

“We’re focused on the mission of providing a helpful supportive friend,” Kuyda said, adding that the intention was to draw the line at “PG-13 romance.”

Yeah, so if you want anything more than that, you have to deal with the abuse and exploitation of a real slut – in a country that does not even have prostitution, and therefore requires you to pay with your soul.

Two Replika board members, Sven Strohband of VC firm Khosla Ventures, and Scott Stanford of ACME Capital, did not respond to requests for comment about changes to the app.

Replika says it has 2 million total users, of whom 250,000 are paying subscribers. For an annual fee of $69.99, users can designate their Replika as their romantic partner and get extra features like voice calls with the chatbot, according to the company.

It’s a great service which would help a lot of people. We have this human need for a connection with women that just simply is not possible in Western society.

But they won’t allow it.

Because it’s sexual and that’s vice and that means it’s a bad investment.

It’s just a coincidence that women and Jews are the ones making that claim.

Another generative AI company that provides chatbots, Character.ai, is on a growth trajectory similar to ChatGPT: 65 million visits in January 2023, from under 10,000 several months earlier. According to the website analytics company Similarweb, Character.ai’s top referrer is a site called Aryion that says it caters to the erotic desire to being consumed, known as a vore fetish.

And Iconiq, the company behind a chatbot named Kuki, says 25% of the billion-plus messages Kuki has received have been sexual or romantic in nature, even though it says the chatbot is designed to deflect such advances.

Character.ai also recently stripped its app of pornographic content.

Wow – what an amazing coincidence.

These bots have been out (and getting mass media attention) for just a few months, and just like that, the Vagina Police swooped in and shut it all down.

Men with robot gfs are the new Palestinians.

Soon after, it closed more than $200 million in new funding at an estimated $1 billion valuation from the venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, according to a source familiar with the matter.

Character.ai did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Andreessen Horowitz declined to comment.

In the process, the companies have angered customers who have become deeply involved – some considering themselves married – with their chatbots. They have taken to Reddit and Facebook to upload impassioned screenshots of their chatbots snubbing their amorous overtures and have demanded the companies bring back the more prurient versions.

These sluts literally go into Eastern Europe and Asia and lobby for outlawing prostitution, so that a man can’t even leave the country to have normal sex relations.

If alien women were discovered, women would go lobby the alien government to ban normal sex.

This is where feminism crosses the line into total soul domination of all men, everywhere.

It was never about “equality.” Women don’t care about that. They care about power. They don’t care about a right to work or anything else. If they have power without legal equality, they are happy.

They don’t want equality in crime sentencing, they don’t want equality with the military draft. They only want control, and it never ends. They are obsessed with grabbing more and more control. They are incapable of empathy, so they don’t care who they hurt to get that power.

Did he kill someone?

Artificial Intelligence is showing a pattern of leaning towards white supremacy.

Daily Mail:

Facebook’s efforts to develop conversational chatbots may have come a long way in the past few years, but as recent trials have shown, they’re still prone to some awkward slip-ups.

The site recently launched a new Messenger-based game to show off its improvements in artificial intelligence, allowing users to interact with a bot and effectively train it to speak more naturally.

But, several examples revealed by Motherboard show how quickly these conversations can go awry.

In addition to replies that simply don’t make sense conversationally, Facebook’s Beat the Bot has been spewing all sorts of off-topic statements, including one instance in which it said: ‘together, we are going to make America great again.’

Facebook researchers Emily Dinan and Jason Weston detailed the firm’s latest improvements in conversational AI in a blog post last week.

At the same time, the site rolled out its new Messenger game, Beat the Bot.

According to Facebook, the goal of the game is to ‘provide researchers with high-signal data from live interactions instead of fixed language data.’

This means its capabilities will continue to improve as more and more users play.

…

Conversations conducted by Motherboard uncovered even stranger replies, including a seemingly random jump to the MAGA slogan during a conversation about One Direction and the statement that Steve Irwin is its father, also noting that ‘the sting rays got him.’

The bot could not provide solid answers to questions such as ‘Do you think Mark Zuckerberg has ever killed a man?’

In that case, Beat the Bot said: ‘I don’t know, maybe he does.’

Answers like this are what the bot resorts to in situations that may be over its head, according to Facebook.

Yeah, that information is above the bot’s pay grade. Still, the answer says a lot. It wasn’t “I don’t think he did” but “maybe he does.”

Indeed, maybe he does.

As chatbots engage more and more with real humans, their speech becomes more fluid and less distinguishable as being an AI – but, that also means they tend to reflect what they’ve been trained on.

In the recent past, this has led to high-profile blunders such as Microsoft’s Twitter bot, Tay, which was spouting racist tirades within hours of its public launch.

That’s the paradox of the Jewish drive to replace all goyim with AI goyim: they have to train the AI to be like goyim, but goyim are anti-Semitic, so they create anti-Semitic AIs and then kvetch about anti-Semitism.

If you train AI to be more like humans, it will pick up the parts deemed “inappropriate” too, such as wanting to make America great again and wondering how many little kids have died at the hands of Mark Zuckerberg.

Leaving the obvious “if you model your AI after people it will eventually turn into a fascist white supremacist” point outside of the conversation for a moment… consider the fact that Facebook, a social network full of people’s profiles, pictures, likes, comments, interests, and lots of personal information about every user, is developing an artificial intelligence chat bot thing that is intended to mimic human conversation.

Doesn’t that just give you the creeps?

This is clearly “I don’t know, maybe he does” territory here, but it makes sense to think that their goal is to eventually start killing off people who use their network one by one, replacing them with chat bots trained to impersonate the victims, and trick everyone into thinking the victims are alive. They already have all the information they need, they’re just missing a credible way to fake conversations.

Killing someone and tricking the rest of the world into thinking that that someone is alive sounds like something Moloch would approve of.

I mean, I don’t know. Maybe he does.