charlie kirk – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:47:35 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png charlie kirk – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Astroturf Bonanza: Double-Talking Kook Nick Fuentes Continues Flooding Internet with Lies and Gibberish https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/10/23/astroturf-bonanza-double-talking-kook-nick-fuentes-continues-conquering-internet-with-lies-and-gibberish/ Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:47:35 +0000

Following the death of Charlie Kirk, all sorts of weird things are going on.

It has “rallied the MAGA base” in a depraved manner, similar to the way the nation was rallied after 9/11. Clearly, this was intended by the administration, which has worked with all of these “alternative media influencers,” to stoke the hysteria. We are hearing from Trump that there is an “enemy within,” and he appears to be describing more than the immigrants. There is some kind of Antifa narrative, apparently.

This is all very convenient. I’m not saying that someone in the White House said “they won’t quit talking about the Epstein Files and they’re still upset about these wars? The podcasters are all talking about Palantir and this Peter Thiel antichrist thing? Well, I don’t know – murder Charlie Kirk, I guess.” But it is not hard to imagine that someone at the White House said precisely those words before the shooting.

Basically, every MAGA person is now calling for a police state. Further, they demand much more extreme censorship than Democrats ever called for. Whereas Joe Biden secretly communicated with social media companies, ordering them to censor things he did not like, the Trump Administration is openly threatening to use the power of government to silence people. Pam Bondi, who is a really dumb bitch, is saying she is going to start arresting people “on both sides” for “hate speech,” something which is not only not illegal, but which the Supreme Court has repeatedly said does not exist and cannot exist in America.

In 2017, during Matal v. Tam, the most recent instance of hate speech being brought before the court, Judge Alito wrote in the unanimous opinion:

Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express ‘the thought that we hate.’

Last month, as a response to Charlie’s death, Bondi, who is currently operating in the position of the highest office of any lawyer on the planet, announced that without any law, she will begin targeting and arresting people for legal speech.

Meanwhile, Trump has taken to using comic book villain rhetoric about “an invasion from within” as he releases the military onto the streets for unclear purposes.

Citing Kirk’s death, James “JD Vance” Bowman is talking about retraining law enforcement to focus on political enemies of the president.

Within the context of this new war against political “enemies within,” Trump is talking about using American cities as training grounds for the US military.

The initial explanation for the deployment of military forces and paramilitary forces onto the streets of the country was immigration. This involved masked ICE agents randomly grabbing people off of the streets, out of church parking lots, and throwing them into vans.

It was my assertion that this would expand to political enemies, and we are now seeing this happening. It was clearly ridiculous to any adult that ICE was going to round up tens of millions of people one at a time and deport them. It was further never explained why the feds were building concentration camps inside of the United States for immigrants (who would presumably be deported).

What I pointed out repeatedly was that you could get rid of upwards of 95% of illegal immigrants by simply making it a serious felony to employ or rent housing to them. With nowhere to work and nowhere to live, they would just leave. You would not need to send military men in masks to throw them into vans. You can go ahead and research why it is that the feds are not targeting the employers and landlords of illegal immigrants. Ask the AI, maybe. There is of course no explanation, despite the fact that this would cost virtually nothing.

The only explanation as to why they would choose these terror raids, choose to release the military, I asserted, is that they are not actually trying to remove every immigrant one by one, but rather trying to get people used to the idea of military and militarized police on the streets throwing random people into vans. I asserted that this military force, along with the system of camps they are building, would be used against non-immigrants. And after Charlie’s murder, we saw the building of the narrative about political enemies, setting up this precise framework.

Meanwhile, the FBI is refusing to answer any of the nagging questions surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk, and is treating it effectively as a closed case. It’s a good thing no one in the media is pressing them on any of their claims.

There are many, many questions about this murder, but the most obvious is probably how it is that Charlie Kirk’s neck was stronger than a 3/8-inch-thick piece of steel.

Again, there are a whole lot of questions. This one is just the most obvious, which alone is more than enough to prove that the FBI’s story of Charlie Kirk’s murder is a lie.

This is what a .30-06 round, shot at the same distance as Charlie was shot from, does to a 3/8-inch-thick piece of steel. You can find dozens of videos of the same and similar tests being done.

While the FBI refuses to comment, the media has claimed this was a “miracle.”

TPUSA’s spokesman, Andrew Kolvet, has also claimed it was a “miracle.”

It is all very surreal.

It’s happening alongside a whole load of other surreal happenings. Trump is declaring he’s established peace in Israel while Bibi is publicly assuring his supporters no such thing has occurred. He’s made a complete reversal on the Ukraine war. He is blowing up random boats off the coast of Venezuela claiming that they are cocaine traffickers responsible for Chinese fentanyl from Mexico.

It feels like a kind of “shock and awe” campaign to overwhelm the public. But the public is very excited about it, after having been whipped into a frenzy over Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Standing on Charlie’s Corpse, Nick Fuentes has Been Astroturfed as the Most Important Right-Wing Voice on the Internet

Something that is personally very surreal to me is the fact that Nick Fuentes is clearly being positioned by very powerful people to be a new “voice for the youth.” For those who don’t know, and for the sake of full disclosure, Fuentes spent years as my Padawan, basing his show on my materials. Two years ago, I disavowed him due to his decision to associate with and promote Richard Spencer, and then to openly tie himself to documented FBI informant Chuck Johnson. I am a really cool guy, I’m totally super edgy and doesn’t afraid of anything. But I have a hard rule that I do not associate with anyone who associates with FBI informants.

Nick Fuentes pictured with federal informant Charles Johnson. I don’t know if Fuentes has ever explained why he decided to establish this relationship, but according to his followers, Fuentes is not a fed, he is just friends with them and cooperates with them to make content. Notably, court documents show that Johnson not only worked as an informant himself, but was also tasked with recruiting other informants. But hey. Who knows, right? It doesn’t really even matter at this point.

Before I denounced him, Fuentes spent years citing me as his biggest influence, and would use my articles as the basis of virtually every show he did. Now that he has become this alleged superstar, it’s worth analyzing in some detail just what the hell is going on here.

For basic context: he supported Trump until some point before the election. Then he became anti-Trump. However, his current “anti-Trump” stance is that Trump is not doing enough censorship, not doing the police state hard enough, and so on. It’s actually hard to follow, which is sort of the underlying point I want to try to highlight today: it’s all very garbled.

For unclear reasons, Charlie Kirk dying meant that Nick Fuentes became very important, and was all of a sudden everywhere. No one has explained why, and I think I am the only person asking why. But it is clearly astroturf.

When Charlie died, Fuentes said he was too distraught to do a show. Then the next day, he did this really emotional show where the ideas being communicated were confusing to say the least. He started campaigning for mass censorship, and for some kind of domestic terrorism operation or something. (I covered his early post-assassination campaign here.)

He was clearly calling for some kind of police state involving precrime, a la the program being pushed by Palantir:

He actually went so far as to imply that some unspecific left-wing violence group was more of a threat than Israel and Palantir.

I have no idea who these “millions of Americans” he is referring to are. “Antifa” is the only violent leftist political group I’m aware of, and there are not millions of them. In fact, I would be surprised if there were thousands. In all likelihood, Antifa was more or less entirely organized by the FBI itself, as the group existed almost exclusively as a way to shut down right-wing political activism. (Note that whenever you saw arrest photos, they appeared to be standard junkies, who were likely paid to engage in these activities.) Their disappearance after Biden took office, and their failure to reemerge during a second Trump Administration which has much more institutional backing than the first time around, certainly indicates they were operated by the state. Regardless, the implication that Antifa is a bigger threat than Palantir or Israel is obscene. Despite Fuentes’ stated opposition to Trump, downplaying the two biggest influences on the Trump government while calling for a focus on “the enemy within” fits very neatly into Trump’s current agenda of establishing a domestic police state.

In the days following Charlie’s death, Fuentes also appeared to go along with various calls for people to be arrested for “celebrating” the event:

He called in the FBI and demanded Jackson Hinkle be sent to prison for suggesting Israel was involved in the Kirk assassination:

He later walked most of that back, with a “pay no attention to your lying eyes” explanation that he was “misunderstood.” He said he didn’t want people to go to prison, even though he said to Jackson “you are going to prison.” He said he wasn’t calling for “hate speech laws” but rather for the government to pressure businesses into firing and silencing people who weren’t sufficiently sad about Charlie’s death and/or questioned the official story.

As we will see, he regularly says things and then says the opposite thing without acknowledging he is doing this. “The internet is forever” and so on, but he has now apparently created an audience that is too stupid to notice these sorts of things. (I also have questions as to how big of an audience he actually has, given that this “rise” is such a classic astroturf campaign, which I will get into below.)

The Conspiracy Theory That Went Too Far for the Mega-Kook

Fuentes tried to distance himself from me and my content following my denunciation of him. He continued reading my site and using some of my material, but whereas he’d been proud of my support for him previously, he was clearly ashamed to be using me as his main source after I’d denounced him. To make it less obvious that all of the good ideas he ever had were from my website, he went out and tried to make up some of his own conspiracy theories about various things, which became increasingly bizarre. It was stuff I would never say, and I think that was part of the point. It is also possible that he actually believes he is some kind of genius who is able to formulate genius theories no one else can think of. He was called a genius when copying my material, and I think this caused him some confusion about his own ability to do analysis.

I have not watched his show regularly in years, but people have sent me clips of some very wild theories. Just as an example, he told people that the Taylor Swift Dance Club stabbing that took place in England on July 29, 2024, was a false flag attack by Israel. Three girls between the ages of six and nine were killed by one Axel Rudakubana, the son of Christian immigrants from Rwanda. There wasn’t any evidence for the theory and it didn’t make any sense, but he said Israel did it to stop the pro-Palestine protests that were happening in the country. He claimed Netanyahu ordered the alleged Trump assassination attempt so the GOP would install Nikki Haley as president. There are many such cases, with very extreme assertions often relying on a single datapoint, and regularly presented as established fact. You will learn about quite a few of his theories below.

Given that he was so aggressive in promoting often totally nonsensical theories, it is very strange then that Fuentes is now claiming that there is nothing at all suspicious about the killing of Charlie Kirk, and going so far as to promote a conspiracy theory that anyone who says the assassination is suspicious and that the government may not be telling the whole truth is a Russian agent. Specifically, he has listed Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Jackson Hinkle, and Max Blumenthal as secret agents of Russia.

Fuentes has publicly accused Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Max Blumenthal of violating the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) and working for Russia to try to discredit the FBI
Fuentes’ theories of right-wing media personalities being secretly paid by Russia to discredit US intelligence agencies mirror theories promoted by Rachel Maddow during the first Trump term. She was eventually sued for defamation by one of her targets, though the court decided she was “not presenting the claim as fact.”
Fuentes’ theories also mirror those promoted for years by Democrat politicians, including Hillary Clinton

After years of supporting Russia when he was using my material as the basis of his show, he has pivoted to Democrat-style theories about Russians trying to undermine faith in our institutions. Many people would consider this theory of Russian agents secretly paying some of the most popular right-wing pundits in America to discredit the FBI to be a much wilder conspiracy theory than the suggestion that the FBI could be lying about what is apparently the biggest act of political violence since 9/11.

It is notably unclear where exactly Fuentes is going with this theory. The most obvious explanation would be that he is involved with the FBI and they are telling him to promote anti-Russian materials while defending their official narrative about Charlie Kirk. This would certainly go a long way towards explaining why, after Kirk’s death, he has been pulled from obscurity into the mainstream of the right-wing internet media. He has appeared on podcasts or shows with Patrick Bet-David, the Nelk Boys, Red Scare, Glenn Greenwald, Hodgetwins, Russell Brand, Dave Smith, and others. Given that there is no hard evidence of an organic increase in interest in Fuentes or his “back the FBI or you’re a Russian” claims after Kirk’s death, this is the definition of “astroturf.” (Note: though it’s beyond the scope of this piece, these “alternative media” people all have agents who communicate through backchannels, just like “mainstream media” personalities, so the logistics of an astroturf campaign in this space are not complex.)

One may wish to give the benefit of the doubt, to try to steelman a position where he is innocently spreading “Russian meddling” theories. It is unclear how this would be done. It’s not believable that anyone actually believes Charlie had a “neck of steel.” And it is incomprehensible that someone who has spent so many years framing himself as an opponent of the US empire would all of a sudden start defending the FBI and claiming Russians are attempting to discredit it.

It is particularly strange that he is going so hard in attacking people for claiming Israel may have assassinated Charlie Kirk, given that he has framed himself as some kind of extreme opponent of Israel and the Jews. Again, no serious adult believes the official story, given that it is physically impossible and relies on a “steel neck miracle.” Given that Israel is infamous for doing political assassinations all over the planet, and given that it aligns with Israel’s interests, it is certainly well within the bounds of rational discourse to consider that Israel may have been behind Kirk’s death.

To attempt to silence discussion of possible Israeli involvement in the killing with claims of Russian disinformation makes this shilling almost cartoonish. You see him being rewarded for this shilling all over the place with this massive astroturf.

“Russian Meddling” Narrative Glitch

Claiming that people questioning the FBI’s narrative on Kirk are Russian agents necessarily creates a whole series of narrative problems.

To wit, one would have to assume that anyone who believes that Owens, Carlson, Blumenthal, and Hinkle are being paid by Russia to discredit the FBI’s claims about Charlie’s assassination are also working for Russia to discredit the FBI’s claims about Epstein, the State Department’s claims about the Ukraine war, and so on and on. It simply would not make sense if these individuals were Russian agents only on the issue of Charlie Kirk’s death. Right? I mean, that’s crazy obvious, is it not? I mean, did they just start working for Russia, sometime between the FBI’s Epstein scandal and the assassination of Charlie Kirk? So like, they were being real when they questioned the FBI about Epstein, but then they got hired by Israel to discredit the FBI, so they’re doing a Russian op questioning them about Charlie? I guess it would have to be either that, or that Fuentes actually supports the FBI’s claims about Epstein.

Wait, here he is in July saying Candace works for Russia. In one of his very interesting and brilliant original theories, he says Candace believing Macron’s wife is a tranny is proof she works for Russia. And she interviewed Andrew Tate. Also, working for Ben Shapiro indicates a Russian angle. (That’s the theory. This is this person’s content.)

“Candace is definitely Russian,” he says. Here’s another clip of him saying the same thing a week later, just so you’re clear this wasn’t just some random comment. (In the context of an interview, he backs down from “definitely” and says “speculative.” It’s worth watching if you want a bit more information on how he just pulls theories out of nothing at all. Fantastically, he says “maybe two years ago, I didn’t believe any of this.” It’s a great compliment to me.)

Just you wait. It gets dumber before it gets even dumber.

Before he was astroturfed all over the place, he could make a stupid claim, then just delete his posts and move on. But with this new attention on him, these tactics are not working. He is clearly not “ready for prime time.”

Just for the record, I am not only banned from Twitter, but linking this site on Twitter is also prohibited. It is listed as “dangerous.” Despite having the great privilege to be on Twitter and having his account boosted at every turn, Fuentes regularly posts on Telegram instead so that people cannot respond to him and question his claims. During his attacks on Candace Owens for questioning the official story of Kirk’s death, he attacked her on Telegram for claiming Netanyahu offered Kirk $150 million.

When I saw that, I said “hold on a second, he was promoting that himself!” Various fellows on my forum told me “oh no dude, he might not usually be consistent, but he’s been consistent on this for sure.” My bro said this to me:

I just about snapped.

After smashing everything in my room, it then took me an hour to find the clip:

On the Bibi offer of $150 million, he says: “I have independently confirmed that by the way, I’ve heard that from four [handsign, FOUR] people. Four people that I trust, that are in the know. So this is coming from Candace Owens, a friend of Charlie Kirk, this is coming from Max Blumenthal, who purports to have a source, and I have heard, from a handful of people independently of those sources, that this offer was real.”

Here’s the face he makes after saying that:

(The original video on Nick’s Rumble is here. It starts at 1:06:00.)

He holds up four (4) fingers to stress that four (4) of his sources have confirmed this thing that he now claims was a Candace Owens hoax.

So why did it take me an hour to find it? Well, because the main tweet which spread this claim, a tweet by @ImperiumFirst which had millions of views, was deleted.

I then found a deleted reddit post:

I also came across this in my searching:

That link leads to this:

But wait: there is a reupload of that video.

“Where did we get this $150 million figure? We got it from Candace Owens and Max Blumenthal.” He then goes on to say that Candace and Blumenthal claim they never said that. (I don’t know if they said that. They are also under investigation by me, but not in this article.) He also says in this clip “my credibility is now on the line.” Yeah, no shit. What happened to your four very reliable sources???

He does not mention those four sources he claimed to have, putting the entire thing on Candace and Max.

(I found the original video on Nick’s Rumble, here. It starts at 2:04:00.)

Just a side note here: Fuentes refers to his “groypers” as “Elite Human Capital.”

Here’s the one who’s talking in that clip:

Going through these clips, I also found this one:

Just, I mean. If anyone is keeping track of the physiognomy patterns found among these EHCs, you might want to note those two.

So what about the deleted tweet from @ImperiumFirst? The one that had millions of views? Well, that’s a totally pro-Fuentes account (Imperium First instead of Fuentes’ America First. It’s a Warhammer gag, you see. These EHCs are very clever with stuff like that). One wouldn’t have to be a kook conspiracy theorist to imagine Fuentes DM’d him and asked him to delete that tweet. I mean. Why else would he have deleted it? He knew the statements had been clipped and didn’t want it reposted in the comments section, so he posted his claim that Candace was responsible for the $150 million theory on Telegram.

This is how he is used to operating. It works when you’re an obscure streamer. When you’re the next big thing, it probably doesn’t work as well. This is the definition of “not ready for prime time.”

You might be thinking “oh, so he lied about having sources for a claim, then he decided to completely change his own narrative, and then he covered his tracks so he didn’t look like a stupid liar, wow, is that such a big deal?” Firstly, yes. How the hell can you have a person you trust for information lying to you and covering it up? Like, sure, give him the benefit of the doubt that he believes the “steel neck miracle theory” and all of the rest of it. He definitely knew that he claimed he had four sources, and his viral clip (later deleted) was most responsible for spreading this $150 million theory. Then he lied and said the claim came exclusively from Candace and Max. As he is building a narrative that anyone who claims the FBI is dishonest is a Russian agent.

Oh, and lest we forget: he is also now promoting the idea that Russia is working with Israel.

I’m sure there is some zany kookspiracy theory explaining how Russia’s nearly century-long alliances with all of Israel’s enemies, including their current support and arming of Iran, is all somehow fake or whatever. But yes, while Fuentes is claiming that Russia is paying Candace, Tucker, etc. to blame Israel, he also claims Russia is secretly best friends with Israel. So, you know. Don’t really know what to say about that, but it certainly adds yet another layer of “wait, what?” to this layer cake of confounding gibberish.

But wait.

Can it get dumber? 

People Can Have Opinions

To be clear, I do not know what happened to Charlie Kirk. At first, the official story, that he was killed by a radical trans supporter, made sense to me. The story started to make less and less sense the more I heard about it. There is a lot you can go into. There is a lot of disinformation mixed in with legitimate theories. But the “steel neck miracle” thing is something you can zoom in on that cannot be true. What I had initially assumed is that the bullet went through his neck and into some concrete or brick behind him. Now that it has been established that the official story is that the bullet was stuck in his neck, “just under the skin,” it is impossible for anyone to genuinely believe the official story. However, let’s say we give Fuentes all the benefits of all the doubts, assume he is very unfamiliar with guns, and maybe hasn’t taken the 1-2 minutes it would take to research how a .30-06 round could be stopped by a human neck at that range. Lashing out at people who question the FBI is very strange, a conspiracy kook saying this monumental event should be accepted at face value is very out of character, and when you add this “Russian meddling” gibberish, it becomes too much.

What is the big deal? Why go so hard trying to defame people who are asking questions? And are we really supposed to believe that his defense of Israel and his attacks on Russia are completely unrelated to a spontaneous astroturf campaign? Does anyone believe that?

Also, to further clarify my own position here, I am not a defender of Owens, Carlson, or Blumenthal, all of whom I have issues with, and may even be suspicious of. Carlson definitely needs to explain what he was doing in Nicaragua in the 1980s, for example. However, I do not take issue with them questioning the FBI’s narrative of the Kirk shooting, just like I don’t take issue with them questioning the FBI’s narrative about Epstein, or really anything else. (Note: I do take some issue with Candace’s theories about Macron’s wife being a tranny. Though I also think it is hilarious.)

Just as an example here, if I was going to accuse Carlson of something, I would accuse him of purposefully mixing a lot of good information with some very bad information, which is a very basic disinformation tactic. He is very hawkish on China, he promotes the UFO and aliens hoax, and he has appeared at points to support gay marriage and other liberal sexual norms I do not think belong in a Christian society. “Limited hangout” is a piece of CIA jargon describing a situation where the official story no longer holds up, so you admit the truth in part while withholding other truths, which is how a lot of the “alternative media” seems to function. However, the only entity that would be running this kind of operation would be the US government. And indeed, just months ago, Fuentes was accusing Carlson of being a CIA operative. Now he’s accusing him of being a Russian agent trying to discredit US intelligence. So, is it both? He is working with the Kremlin and the CIA to discredit the FBI?

Note: I understand I am belaboring the point here. But as I have seen no one else with any kind of large platform questioning the “Astonishing Rise of Nick Fuentes,” I feel it is necessary to be thorough, and to make it fully clear just how bizarre this all is. We need all of this on the record.

Who are the Fans of Nick Fuentes?

Along with all of these shows, there has been a barrage of mainstream media articles about Fuentes. It’s actually overwhelming, constant press. Type his name into any news aggregator.

What’s highly notable is that much of this coverage is neutral, if not bordering on positive. Whenever he made the media during his time under my tutelage, he was referred to in any headline as a “neo-Nazi” or a “white supremacist,” and these terms have been replaced with “far right” or “white nationalist.” I’ve read a lot of these articles, and none of them note any of the weird theories, which as far as I can tell, are his core content at this point. By not pointing out things like “he says Tucker Carlson works for both Russia and the CIA,” they are effectively running cover for him. No one who is prone to supporting right-wing politics is going to be turned off by any of this. Six weeks out from Charlie’s death, there are daily articles from the likes of Mediate and Raw Story just reporting on things he said.

Last week, GQ called him a sex symbol.

In an almost unbelievable alleged coincidence, literally the day before Charlie’s death, the New York Times published a piece about him that was as close to a puff piece as the Times has ever given anyone who spent years denying the Holocaust and praising Hitler. In a case of eerie precision or you know, something else, the Times writers predicted “rising influence.”

What is interesting is that aside from Ron Unz and myself, I don’t really see anyone critically questioning what is going on here. There isn’t any discussion of really anything about him, anywhere. There are these media articles, which present a boilerplate narrative about how he was on the fringe and now he’s mainstream. They don’t attempt to offer any insight into it, other than that “young people are turning to the far right.”

Note: I haven’t seen any of them mention me. There is a hard blackout in the media of my name (that’s what happens when the establishment is actually afraid of what you’re doing). I am mentioned only in very specific contexts. But it is quite a thing to talk about Nick Fuentes’ rise and not mention me. Long time readers, who also followed Fuentes, know that I’m not exaggerating this: his entire show, for over five years, was based on my website. And it isn’t simply that he would copy the material, but he would credit me on the show, call me his hero and his biggest influence. It’s actually sad to think about. I guess I can just say that. This whole thing is still a bit emotional for me. I don’t think that makes me a pussy. I believed he was copying me because he believed in my material. Certainly, without having used my material for all those years, he never would have been notable. He is charismatic enough, and has oratory skills, but if he had come out of the gates with this kookspiracy stuff, there never would have been any real traction.

Here’s the question though: who are all these people following him? Where is the evidence that they exist? If he has all of these hundreds of thousands of followers, why is there no critical discussion of him anywhere?

In what was clearly a stunt and part of the astroturf campaign, he had a Spotify account for a few days, and it is claimed that it became the number one podcast in the world.


He said he didn’t make the account, that some random person just started uploading the shows, and that resulted in it becoming number one.

That does not even seem possible. How would the podcast be promoted in the first place if he didn’t tell people about it? Assuming it got caught in an algorithm, are we to believe that no one is monitoring the charts at all?

Based on his YouTube followers, and the pictures of his followers we’ve seen in public since his split with me, his followers we can prove exist are a bunch of grotesque Mexican gargoyles. Is it possible that Hispanics didn’t know about him, and he is just really appealing to them? That is possible. Hispanics do this with their stars. But it can’t explain the numbers.

All of the material you see posted as comments anywhere looks like bots. On Twitter, for example, you don’t find the kind of back-and-forth between posters that you would see on really any other person’s Twitter comments. There is nothing negative. It is just a bunch of slogans and cringe memes.

Here are some top memes posted on a recent Fuentes tweet:

What is going on there? Those are humans? Bots? Boomers? Indians?

Note: It may seem trite, but as a founding member and former leader of the Alt-Right, the fact that our people were always funny was very important to me, as it was evidence of high intelligence and good socialization. If I was running a movement and my followers were just posting “GOAT” and “cope and seethe” and GIFs from Office Space, I might have considered pulling a Fuentes and selling them out to the feds. No, I joke. But only because I hate the feds so much. In all seriousness though, I definitely would have considered selling them into slavery to build skyscrapers in Dubai.

Just go look yourself. I just clicked the top post and found this at the top:

Here’s the account:

It’s a bunch of similar memes, and replies to known botted-out accounts.

Elon Musk:

End Wokeness:

No joke, that was the first one I clicked.

The second one I clicked was this:

And the account is a bunch of reposts of viral dog videos.

Go through and investigate yourself. @NickJFuentes. Scroll through the comments on any tweet and see what you see. Click through randomly on the commenters. See what you see.

I’m obviously not saying he has no followers. He had followers before the media and the “influencer network” started pushing him like this. I don’t know whether Rumble has a good record for accurate viewer numbers, but after Elon Musk personally decided to give Fuentes his account back, his numbers on Rumble, where he primarily streams, went from an average of 20,000 views to nearly ten times that. But there is clearly a concerted campaign by both establishment and “alternative” media to present him as a phenomenon, and there simply is no evidence that the interest matches the hype.

Insofar as these groypers (often called “mugus” by those critical of Fuentes) are real people, they do not engage in any form of critical analysis of his materials. If you ever come across one, ask them to name one thing Fuentes was ever wrong about. They will become very uncomfortable, and simply begin calling you names.

They are now repeating his narrative about how everyone who questions the integrity of the FBI or anything else Nick Fuentes supports is a Russian agent. Last month, Ron Unz of Unz.com, where my articles are often reposted, cited me when questioning exactly what was going on with Fuentes, and many of the allegedly human followers of Fuentes attacked Unz without even attempting to address or defend Fuentes’ new position on “Russian meddling.”

Note that after Fuentes stopped promoting the Daily Stormer as his primary influence, he began citing Unz as his favorite website.

They Call Him “NATO Nick”

It’s impossible to go through all the weird shit this guy is saying. But it’s worth noting that there is more State Department type material, and it’s worth contrasting it with his previous materials.

Along with pushing this “Russian agents” theory, “NATO Nick” as they are calling him is now all of a sudden talking about “Russian aggression” against NATO.

Russian aggression against NATO…!

Here he is doing his zany conspiracy theory bit against Jackson Hinkle, who he says is a Russian agent because he has a Russian girlfriend.

The most notable thing about that is that he says there is “no difference” between Russia influencing our politics and Israel doing so. That is a truly incredible statement for a number of reasons, but surely, putting everything else aside (such as the fact Russia is not engaged in an organized influence campaign in America, and comparing Jackson Hinkle’s Twitter account to AIPAC and the $200 billion Miriam Adelson gave to Donald Trump is utterly nonsensical), the intent and effect of Russian influence would be much different than that of Israeli influence.

In that clip, he also claims Russian Foreign Affairs Minister Sergey Lavrov personally “tipped off” Hinkle to “investment opportunities.” As far as I can tell, there is literally no source for that anywhere. I used multiple AIs to attempt to find even a rumor of this posted on reddit or some other obscure forum, and none of them could find anything, with one noting: “Even in spaces like r/Destiny, r/NAFO, and r/KnowledgeFight, where Hinkle is frequently mocked or analyzed, there is no mention of a Lavrov-provided investment tip.” Fuentes seems to have made it up out of thin air, which is another one of his strategies. He usually cites “his sources” when inserting a completely fabricated claim. (It would be shocking to me if he had any sources at all, given that aside from being a ridiculous and totally unserious person, he is virtually impossible to deal with on a personal level due to a lack of a basic understanding of human social norms. Further, he constantly posts private messages from people he’d previously been cordial with or even worked with directly. I have documented that he publicly tried to blackmail me, threatening to reveal private information. [This is a felony, by the way. And for the record, the first time I heard this I demanded he release whatever this blackmail was, and instead he simply continued to make the threat. More very odd behavior.] He suggests many of these “sources” he claims to have are inside of the government, meaning statements to him would be “leaking,” which though a common practice, is in many contexts a felony that can carry up to a ten-year prison sentence.)

Note: I assume Fuentes is getting some of these weird talking points from handlers, and he just inserts them randomly without coherent structure. However, he also seems to get confused about what his handlers are telling him to say. Further, separately from whatever handlers are feeding him this disinformation, he appears to be a pathological liar. And then separate from that, it also appears that he creates conspiracy theories in his own mind, and the lack of pushback from his “mugu” followers reinforces the idea that he can keep creating goofier and goofier theories. You can see above that on his own show, he said Candace is “definitely Russian,” stating it as a fact, but then when sitting across from someone looking a bit skeptical, he adds “it’s speculation” at the end. I’m including this as a side note because it really doesn’t matter why he spews out all of this convoluted and confounding nonsense, but it is obviously natural for people to try and understand how something like this happens. Further, it is worth noting that schizophrenia typically manifests in the early to mid-twenties. Fuentes is 27 now, whereas when he began using my material, he was in his early twenties. I am not asserting that he has clinical schizophrenia, as there are obviously other possible explanations for this (primarily, being fed disinformation by handlers and being too stupid to effectively communicate it), but a lot of the lines of thought he presents do line up with schizoid disorder. I also just want to take this opportunity to note that the idea that people take this man seriously, and I am now “debunking” something that could at least be confused for schizophrenic ramblings, is incredibly exhausting.

This anti-Russia narrative he is pushing is very new. He maintained a positive view of Russia, left over from when he was getting his entire script from me, up until earlier this year.

Here is Fuentes in June of this year talking about how, in the wake of the Ukraine drone striking Russia’s nuclear-capable bombers in Siberia, Russia would be justified in nuking the Ukraine.

That is definitely not exactly an anti-Russia take, three months before Kirk’s death. (Please enjoy his explanation of the way nuclear deterrence works. He has a lesser understanding of this issue than anyone who has taken International Relations 101 or like, read the Wikipedia page about Deterrence Theory. Again, he seems to believe he is a genius and he can just intuitively understand how everything in the world works. Of course, he is playing for an audience which, if he says something with enough confidence, will just accept it, so I guess it works out for everyone.)

Here’s Fuentes in March of this year, calling for the US to surrender the Ukraine to Russia:

Going back a bit, in January of last year, just going through all my talking points about how the US caused the war:

More basic, obvious stuff from early 2024:

Also worth noting is that he supports the US doing regime change in Venezuela to take their resources.

But don’t let that bother you, because while he supports regime change, he is also against it.

I think he said he supports it because the US should steal their resources, but he is also against it, because Marco Rubio is Cuban? Honestly, it is absurd to try to make sense of any of it. It’s whatever. But note that there is a definite pattern not only of changing his views back and forth, but of presenting multiple conflicting views in a very short timeframe, without explanation, indicating that he actually holds conflicting positions in his mind. (Again, one would certainly be inclined to consider mental illness in analyzing that behavior, with the other possible explanation, probably the only other possible explanation, being that he is too stupid to coherently convey narratives that his handlers have given him.) You saw an example of this above, where he said to Jackson Hinkle “you are going to prison” for saying Israel killed Charlie Kirk, tagged the FBI in a call to arrest Hinkle for his posts, called for the government to act against people who engaged in anti-Charlie speech after his death, then later claimed he didn’t want arrests or hate speech laws and never implied that, saying he was actually talking about mass censorship. Further, as noted above, he has claimed that Tucker Carlson is both a CIA agent and a Russian agent, claiming to hold both beliefs at the same time.

To be clear, everyone has a right to change their position on anything. I have very rarely changed my position on anything, but most people have. Sargon of Akkad comes to mind as an example of someone who has gone through a pretty significant transformation in his way of thinking about things over the years. However, whenever he would make a change in his mode of thought, in his presentation of his ideas, Sargon would spend many hours explaining why and how he changed his view.

Fuentes has made no attempt to explain how he went from cheering on Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, from praising Russia as a Christian country fighting against the satanic Western empire, to arguing that Russia is engaged in a campaign of disinformation to discredit the FBI and that they are actually the aggressors in the conflict with NATO. So it is certainly a fair question to ask how many of these people who are going along with this, following Nick and changing their views to match his without any explanation, are even real people.

Note that mainstream MAGA has been very critical of Trump when he’s changed his position on H-1B visas, on the Epstein Files, on the Ukraine war, and so on. And Trump has done more than Fuentes to try to explain why he changed his positions.

Other Gobbledygook (Of a More Dangerous Sort)

Fuentes recently stirred controversy among morons after telling his followers to infiltrate the CIA. This clip went viral and actually did stir some discussion from real people, given the bizarre nature of the statements.

A recent article in WIRED described the Fuentes plan to “conquer America.”

There’s a lot you could say about this. Some of it would be very funny, I’m sure. I mean, like, you could point to the examples we have of his Elite Human Capital.

(Yes, posting that photo does feel a bit cruel. I understand that and feel bad about it.)

But there is a pretty obvious “bottom line” about the “we’re going to infiltrate the CIA” gibberish.

Here is his response to criticism of his plan:

That’s a Telegram post. He uses Telegram as his primary writing platform and encourages all his followers to follow him there. Telegram requires a phone number, and you have to install it on your phone so the app operator gets access to a unique device ID. The owner of Telegram, Pavel Durov, cooperates with the feds (from the US and many other governments) without publicly disclosed warrants. The CIA and really any intelligence agency could obviously get the list of Fuentes’ Telegram followers without that benefit, but they have that benefit.

Fuentes doesn’t even encourage his followers to somehow use op-sec when signing up to follow him on Telegram. It would be virtually impossible to do anyway. You could in theory buy an internet phone number with anonymous cryptocurrency, but you would still have to install the app on your phone, which would mean you could be identified even without the phone number.

Do you see where I’m going with this? Smell what I’m cooking?

Fuentes has created a situation where every federal law enforcement agency has a full list of all of his followers. He encourages people to sign up to multiple TG channels on all his socials. He also sells merch and takes donations with Visa cards.

He holds events at public venues, where people register with their real names. He holds these events at random hotels, which will almost certainly turn over video to the FBI without warrants, and use facial recognition to identify people (your facial recognition data is logged by the federal government when you get your driver’s license).

At an event last year, the venue he’d booked canceled on him, and so, after promising attendees anonymity, he took them all to a public rooftop bar where dozens of people filmed them and posted video on social media.

Serious political leader, by the way. Ready to infiltrate and take over the CIA.

There are dozens of different ways he’s made it possible for the FBI and literally every other intelligence agency on earth to collect full lists of all of his followers.

So obviously, none of his followers are ever going to get anywhere close to state power. They are all on FBI lists as “followers of a right-wing extremist telling his followers to infiltrate institutions of state power.”

What’s more, because Fuentes has framed himself as a “political dissident” with the goal of “reshaping America,” and formed a group based around this idea, if someone from that group attempted to join the CIA for the stated purpose of undermining and reshaping the organization and America, it’s not exactly difficult to imagine that they could be charged with sedition, a very serious felony potentially carrying a 20-year prison term. A lot of this stuff he says is goofy and potentially harmless, but setting up young men to completely destroy their lives is not a joke.

So, do you see how that is just like, retarded? And that only a retarded person would take that seriously, or consider the person saying it a serious person? He has talked about this “infiltration” stuff for years. It would have been very easy, if this was actually your plan, to encourage people to use operational security (op-sec) and ensure that the government doesn’t know who they are. Instead, it’s “show up to this IRL event, follow me on that app where you register with your phone number, and please send me money with your Visa card.”

He is saying “infiltrate the CIA.” Do you believe that he believes that the CIA doesn’t do background checks? Or does he believe the FBI doesn’t create lists of “extremists”? He would have to be very stupid to believe those things. But if he knows those things, and yet he is still saying “get on my right-wing Telegram channel to learn more about how to infiltrate the CIA,” then what exactly is going on?

There is a Lot More to Say (And Say It I Shall)

I mentioned in my last article that the reason I have been publishing less is that I have been working on a new project which will be a podcast, or perhaps more of a TV show. What I have realized is that my role should be analyzing this alternative media that has become the mainstream media. That is where I belong now. The best way I can communicate the truth of things is by showing you where these people are lying. Fuentes is the man of the hour, but all of these alternative media people are rats. I watch these shows, and the amount of lies is simply incredible. It’s virtually all video media, so I need to be on video, so I can show you these videos and break it all down.

I want to do this right. So I’m taking my time. The goal is to have the show put together on or before Valentine’s Day, which marks a year since I quit the daily news. I’m putting together a team. I don’t want to reveal too much, but it will be a weekly show, primarily focused on deconstructing media narratives. We will probably also do some kind of donation drive to help with the costs of the equipment. I’m not going to do that until everything else is ready to go, and we’ve worked out all the staffing details and so on.

What I plan to do is bring back the energy of the best days of the Daily Stormer, which were those years before Charlottesville, when it was fun. I’m really feeling this energy. I’ll have to learn to be on camera and so on. I’ve started filming myself, started working on my oration.

I don’t intend to stop writing. I will write less than I did, but more than I have been in the last few months. For the last few months, I’ve been focused on this project, and until it’s done, you can assume that the less I’m writing, the better it’s going. After we get going, I plan to write a long piece based on the show’s notes before we do the weekly stream, so there is a written accompaniment when I post the show that will include all of the sources I am using, and comments on the topics. Writing is a big part of how I think, so preparing for the show, I will write a kind of outline for the show, published alongside it.

Along with that, I will no doubt publish various other articles during the week.

Right now, I am writing a lot about the show, as I try to work out exactly what I want it to be. But aside from being classic Stormer type anti-media media, I know I want it to be fun. I know I want it to be a Saturday Night Parasocial Spectacular, where I get together with all of my parasocial friends and we drink and vape and talk shit together. But it’s also going to be very structured, and not a “live stream” or a “podcast” but a real show, with significant planning, not some “just chatting” slop with superchats.

I’ve been going in all different directions over the last nine months, working through what I want to do on the next leg of my career, and this is definitely it. And I am going to be very surprised if anyone is disappointed. Well. Without giving too much away, some people will be shocked and confused, particularly those who were not around for the pre-August, 2017 Stormer.

I know most of you are not checking the site very often anymore, because there hasn’t been much content. I am going to set up on Nostr, which is a new (or rather, newly working) uncensorable Twitter clone. We might try some other socials. But I think Nostr is going to be big, and it’s a good place to make our basecamp.

I keep getting frustrated that I didn’t think of this months ago so I could be up and running now for all this weird shit that is going on with these podcasts. Clearly, this article you have just read would have been a lot better as a video. But I needed the time. And I think it is very safe to assume that the weird shit is not going to stop, and we are going to have endless “alternative media” content to analyze.

The Troll Army will be reconstituted and it will be bigger and better and funnier than ever before.

If you are reading this, consider yourself conscripted.

This is the dawn of a new era. My blood is pumping like a machine gun just thinking about it.

“We hope everyone is innocent.” -🦇☭

Article updated to correct the publication date of the NYT piece on Fuentes.

]]> Announcing the Dawn of a New Age of Ultimate Content (I Finally Figured Out Where We’re Going Here) https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/10/08/announcing-the-dawn-of-a-new-age-i-finally-figured-out-where-were-going-here/ Wed, 08 Oct 2025 02:21:40 +0000

At this point, you probably think “oh jeez it’s been a long time since Anglin published something, why isn’t he doing the thing about the Charlie Kirk neck thing proving the whole thing was fake? He must be going through it to miss out on gloating about that, oh jeez.”

I assure you, my dearest friends, I am not going through it. I am going in it.

“He was really into that Charlie Kirk thing, so him not posting about it daily with all this new stuff coming out and the FBI introducing this new magic bullet theory, and this sickening stuff with his nappy ass hoe widow going off the charts, this must mean he’s getting all Irish again, full into it,” is the perfectly logical conclusion to come to based on the current evidence.

However, what has actually happened is that in the process of getting all excited about the Charlie Kirk thing, I have stumbled into an entire new plan for the Stormer. I have become maniacal regarding this plan. I have notes for some Charlie stuff, which I will hopefully publish in the next couple days. Some of it might be a bit behind, but there are things I want to talk about that others have missed. I’ll get it out.

But there is a new project coming. And it is going to be big. It is going to be quite possibly – and I do not say this lightly – the biggest thing in the history of the internet.

What I speak of is the Dawn of a New Age. My Daily Stormer daily articles ran for 12 years straight. Ten years were uninterrupted, literally not a day off. (I used to say “except Christmas,” but I don’t say that anymore because it isn’t true, because I would still publish an article every Christmas day. So aside from days the site was down because of censorship reasons, I was here every single day.) I would say it was probably 9 good years. Maybe 8. I started to kind of lose some of my enthusiasm somewhere between coronavirus and the Ukraine. Probably. That is probably what history will remember.

But what were the best years? Many of you were not even born yet. But many of you remember. The best years were 2014-2017.  Specifically, the good times ended in August of 2017, with the Charlottesville debacle. And it wasn’t just the censorship and all the hounding. It was all of the fun sucked out of the air. Among other things, “Neo-Nazism” went from being the funnest internet meme ever to being “oh, wow, holy shit, there are these fat slobs in these costumes? Fuck my life.” No disrespect to any good guys who went there, which was most of you, but the feds sent these fats in these costumes, and it just really ruined my fun, I’ll tell ya.

Everything got all depressing, I was depressed, things got too serious, I got too serious, got too religious. I am religious now and I’m glad for that, but the religious content, my doomsday vibes (which seemed to come and go in these strange waves), didn’t really ever belong here. This site was always supposed to be fun. That was the original point. It is educational too, but the fun comes first, because the whole idea was the thing I learned from that black guy from Star Trek: learning is fun.

It’s like that song from that band. It was a 1990s pop grunge band. Total scum of the earth, milking Kurt’s corpse like it was Abby Shapiro, Erika Kirk tier, but they are one of my favorite bands. I don’t remember the name right now. Bands at that time had names that were a random word like “shirt” or “chair” or “plug.” How could anyone remember? But they had this song “there’s no sex in your violence.” Although those were the only words in the song that were intelligible, and we didn’t have the internet to just look up lyrics back in those days, I don’t know what the context of that was, but from the tone, it was clear that sexless violence was not good. It was an accusation or maybe even indictment: “you are hereby accused of sexless violence.” And I think we all get that, right? If you have sex in your violence, you get something cool and fun, like “The Warriors.”

And sexless violence? Well, that’s Gaza, folks. That is what violence with no sex looks like. Just families being burned alive, children blown to pieces, everyone starving to death, buried under rubble, all of that. Not cool.

Speaking of classic 1970s acts of cinema, Zardoz, my favorite film, is actually a lesson about how sexless violence is a real drag.

And I know you must be sitting there thinking: “where the hell is Anglin going with this sexy violence thing? I mean, I get his point and it is clearly true, and really an enlightening thought, but what does it have to do with that other thing??”

Well, friend, violence that you don’t sex up is like education that isn’t fun. Education that isn’t fun is just Ferris Bueller’s Jew teacher droning at you.

Face like an Easter Island statue, that Jew.

Collie included for scale. Don’t contact me and tell me that is not a collie. If you think that, take it up with your favorite dog analyzer, because I simply do not have that kind of time right now.

That Jew from that movie was so boring, he never even got metooed. Working in Hollywood AND academia for decades, as Jewish as they come, never even groped a bitch or whipped out his pecker and dipped it in some slut’s coffee sitting on her desk and said “oohhh, that’s warm, yeah.” That’s the kind of thing you can get out of: “my doctor told me I needed to heat up my balls every 4 hours and I didn’t notice she was sitting at the desk because my glasses were the wrong prescription due to a mixup at LensCrafters. I apologize and will spend my time listening more.”

You know that “no sex in your violence” song could have been “there’s no bizarre pervert actions in your Jews” and it would have been just as damning.

You have to keep the fun in the education, and I am bringing back the fun. I have a plan. And it is going to work. I am laser focused. I don’t really like the word “laser” anymore, because I think of that laser eyes thing people did that I hated so much. I will never be able to separate the word laser from that horrible time in my life when everyone I hated was doing that. Except Steve Sailer. No, wait, I actually do hate Steve Sailer. He’s the world’s most boring race scientist (seriously, bro, spice it up a bit). What is that Bitcoin psychopath’s name. I like that guy. One of the only white guys you see and think “this guy probably rapes women, not in the ‘date rape’ or ‘statutory rape’ way, but in the real negro way.” (“Classic rape,” we call that. I tried to put “rape classic” to give it a kind of sophisticated French allure but it never really caught on.) However, he’s never going to get metoo’d because every woman he raped has zero doubt he will kill them and their whole family – without the use of a gun. There is nothing I love more than a white guy who gives off that vibe. You can’t fake it, you have to be born that way. (Jake Paul’s spiritual guru has it.) But isn’t his name also Steve Sailer? Whatever, I don’t care, but yeah so there was one guy I didn’t hate who did that eye laster thing, so I can still use the word on very rare occasions, but you’ll notice I have cut more use of the word laser back by well over 95%.

But “laser focus” is the only term that fits here, I promise you. I have a vision in a way I have never had since the original vision for the Stormer. We have moved on from midlife crisis to midlife crisis management. It was one of the key revelations that slid into place since I broke up with you all on Valentine’s Day. I said “I’m in a midlife crisis, but I’m the world’s number one crisis management expert, so hey, pal, get it together. Put those two things together. Get to midlife solutions, get to midlife renaissance. Get this fucking show on the road because I am so bored trying to write books that I’m going to fucking kill myself.”

Hey, look, I’m sorry. I have like a million words of “book material.” No joke. I mean do the math. All those words I was writing for the site, I’m now writing for my own projects. I’m also focused on this mantra of “just get the first draft finished, it doesn’t matter how sloppy it is,” so it’s even sloppier than the stuff I publish on this website which is often just like a situation where someone vomits in a mosh pit, like that level of sloppiness. So imagine that turned up to ten, then imagine my word count.

Of course I haven’t been spending all that time writing, there has been a lot of time thinking and scheming and plotting and brooding like some kind of ancient man who was cursed to never be able to die, like at the time of the dinosaurs he got cursed like that, imagine the kind of brooding such an individual would be doing and that’s been me a lot of the time since February.

And I’ve come up with the thing. I’ve come up with a way to bring back the energy, to bring back the sense of community, where we’re all working together to really fuck people that we hate, and really forming a sense of internet brotherhood based on a shared sense of existential purpose in bringing the people we hate to their knees. If you were there, you know. You know what that felt like and you know you’ve never felt anything like that in your life. It is the greatest feeling in the world, to be a part of that kind of operation.

You may be aware of this gay Mexican who claims Russian disinformation agents are trying to discredit the totally truthful FBI story that a miracle (they’re calling it “a miracle”) caused a .30-06 round to get caught in Charlie Kirk’s neck. Nick Fuentes. We’re talking about this guy now because since the Charlie Kirk assassination (preempted by a glowing profile in the New York Times – figure that out), he’s become like this main character in the shill right. After I broke up with him after effectively writing all his material for like four years due to this decision to work with FBI informants, this guy starts saying that he has blackmail on me, and I was like “what is this?” As soon as he started with this blackmail threat shit, which is so catty and creepy and most of all gay, I demanded he reveal whatever the secret thing was. I said “publish all the texts I know you saved, tell whatever story you didn’t save, put everything out there, I demand it.” Instead of revealing it, he just kept threatening it, as if he hadn’t seen me say every time he threatened me “publish that shit you fucking queerback.” (“Queerback” is a portmanteau of “queer” and “wetback,” which I am still, you know, working on. That’s still in the workshop.) I will tell you there is no reason to even hit on the fact that he’s a public associate and collaborator with FBI informants, which I don’t know why anyone would be doing unless they themselves were FBI informants, especially when it’s like, Chuck Johnson, who is a bottom of the barrel schizo who was apparently so mentally ill that the feds won’t even work with him anymore and are embarrassed that he keeps claiming to be working with them. But yeah people don’t care if their internet daddies are feds, but they do care if they are gay and Mexican. I mean now that he’s doing Rachel Maddow talking points about Russians trying to undermine faith in our intelligence agencies, maybe people are going to start to take interest in the fed thing, but that’s beyond our scope. This isn’t even the topic, I’m just working up to explaining that I can guarantee that being in the game during the halcyon days of the Stormer was the best feeling any man will every experience in their life.

And this was sooooooo fucking gay. I am actually starting to think this guy is retarded. He was reading Stormer then doing his show just based entirely on my material and I’m thinking “this guy is a genius,” but I realized this was like if I hade a tape recording of myself and played it back and was like “this tape recorder is a genius.” We have retard radar on. He is saying “I don’t trust him because of something he told me in private but I won’t say it.” And it’s like okay how retarded do you have to be to not say “well if you’re not going to say it then why bring it up? If you want to threaten someone with blackmail, just do it, don’t do this little feminine te-he-he bullshit.” Normal heterosexual men find that creepy. Collecting blackmail on people you are friends with is John Wayne Gacy tier to begin with. But then he knows, ever since the first thinly veiled blackmail threat like two years ago now, at least 18 months ago, I said as soon as I saw it “publish it all now.” Instead he just kept doing the weaselly (fat now by the way, which makes it about 78 times grosser) “oh he don’t want the smoke of what I got on him.” But without fail, every time a superchatter brings me up, it’s “oh I’ve got this stuff on him, you wouldn’t believe it.”

My assumption, because I’m the master of these little games, is that he was just hoping I have some dark secret that I fear will be exposed, and if he just hints he knows something, this will keep me from coming after him. This is like something you read in like, The 48 Laws of Power, Robert Greene books, “Dark Triad” stuff. I guarantee he is listening to books on tape of this shit. Look up what that is if you don’t know. Then look at Fuentes. I promise you, you will never be able to unsee it. And you will watch his show, and see him doing this thing like he thinks no one sees it, and you will lose your shit like you just watched a morbidly obese woman fall down a set of concrete stairs.

Finally, I thought “it is actually possible I told him I have bastard children with hookers, some of which are possibly half Asian or perhaps quadroon Asian (which would make them whiter than Fuentes), though others are Slavic, and sometimes I tell people this in private?” I didn’t think I told him that, but then some mugu from his private chat made some comment about it and I was like “oh yeah maybe, definitely possible in a two-hour phone conversations where I’ve had a few I would mention that (I mean I’ve said it on the site repeatedly over the years, granted people probably thought I was joking, but it’s not like, a super secret). All things being equal, I didn’t really want that out there, not because I give a fuck about someone who thinks like, my internet personality suffers because I got some hookers pregnant a few or maybe more than a few times, but because I care about my children, obviously. Even if they are racially impaired. That means nothing to me, in terms of the love I have for them. I don’t want them getting sucked into some shit and trolled or whatever. But I’m in a better situation now, I’m getting my custodies, one bastard at a time I am getting my custodies and bringing all my family together, as it should be. So it’s like, okay, I’ll spill those beans. I spilled them on my secret forum he reads obsessively.

Take a minute to imagine this Robert Greene Mexican homo scheming to go after my kids, which could involve real world harm, even physical, let alone their socials and so on (these kids are mostly teenagers now, all the Asian ones are) because I said I didn’t want to be friends with him anymore on a semi-private forum. This is a serial killer type personality, and like the dumbest type of serial killer personality who reads pop nonfiction “advice for psychopaths” books. And by “reads” I mean “listens to audio books.” This fellow is definitely not a reader.

But the point of that whole story is this: all of these faggots who say that seeing your child for the first time is the most magical experience are just complete faggots. Sorry! Hey, sorry! And no, you racist, it’s not because they’re Asian, one of these bastards is from a totally fresh 18-year-old Slavic girl who literally just showed up from the village and looks like a Hitler advertisement. I’d say the experience is better than Weapons, better than Peacemaker Season 2 (which is woke btw but the anti-Nazi shit if you’re watching it in the reverse is fun), but not as good as like, Ace Ventura.

I think the experiences of like teaching the kid to ride the bike or the motorcycle or whatever, maybe those are magical, I was denied those. I have teenagers I’ve never met showing up. Insane the connection we feel immediately though. And that they feel together. Very wholesome stuff, wish we could do reality TV, but we won’t and they’ll never be on camera. But the fun part is that they are all like, “dad can you help me, I’m trying to fuck with these people on the internet.” Which circles around to where this is all going. (Oh except my hapa quadroon daughter, who is more like “I’m trying to fuck these people from the internet.” This is just. Man, I do not know. I’m like feeding her alcohol starting at 3PM on Fridays so she is too drunk to go out. What am I supposed to do about this? I didn’t raise her. She shows up at the airport as a full grown woman.)

Anyway, the lucky upshot of this is that I can explain why I had to “get a real job” to get money a few years back. When it was just me, it was fine using donation money to pay for my like, $800 a month lifestyle (plus all the other shit in my life caused by the site), but I wasn’t comfortable using donation money to pay for my kids. I respect Peter Brimelow. I don’t really know why I respect him, I never found his writing impressive at all, and the one clip I have of him talking about me can best be described as “damning with faint praise.” But I guess I’m supposed to respect him because he ran a low traffic boomer white nationalism website for 30 years or whatever and because he has an upper class British accent. Anyway, V-Dare was the opposite of me, super low with the energy, super aggressive with the fundraising, and in these hardcore interstitial begging ads, Brimelow would post a picture of his wife and kids! Like “hey, can you guys pay for my wife and kids for me because I edit a blog”??? WHAT? To make it ten trillion times worse, this is his second family!

This is the kind of picture he would use. Imagine putting your family on your white supremacy website. To beg for money to pay for their upper middle class lifestyle because you edit a blog. What does editing a blog even entail? When I had other writers, I would just proofread their articles. If I wasn’t posting myself, this would be less than an hour a day of work. Millennials are in their forties, won’t ever own homes, this guy I guarantee owns horses.

He is like 80 with a 30-year-old wife. Which you know, hey, I am never going to judge that, but I will judge you for expecting others to pay for it! What percentage of young people can even afford one family? And he is going to use aggressive interstitials. This is the most offensive e-begging campaign I’ve ever seen in my life. I would have told him to say “the libs and the dem media are doing me up because I stabbed a guy at Taco Bell, but it was a black, this was completely in self-defense, the libs are out to get me.” I’d drop a 5-spot if Brimmy shanked a nog at the Bell at 3AM. I’m not paying for your second family, bro. This is like posting a picture of a yacht and saying you need donations to make payments – “we’re asking for your support once again, as I am working my best to save the white race by editing a blog with 25,000 monthly uniques, the libs and the dem media cancel culture warriors are trying to repossess my yacht.”

Anyway. Hey. I’m not trying to diss Brimelow. I suspect he hates niggers even more than I do, and I trust a general consensus (though I have no idea what the basis for it is) that he deserves respect like Jared Taylor and Anthony Cumia. And I don’t deserve any respect because boomers get confused by satire like 18th century British elites discussing the suggestion of eating Irish children.

I understand that I haven’t revealed what the project is. I have shot off in all kind of different directions. Of course, the reason is – wait for it – the project is still a secret and I don’t want to drop any spoilers yet. It’s not ultra secret, and you can find me dropping bits here and there, but things are constantly evolving.

I will tell you what I think you can know about the project:

  • This is an AV project. That means it will have both audio and video.
  • I already revealed that it will be fun. That will be the main thing. It is going to be political, but I am going through everything that made the halcyon days of the Stormer great, and figuring out how to bring back all of those key elements that made it great.
  • Heavy community vibe, sense of common purpose, people having fun together.
  • Even some longtime fans are going to be confused by it, potentially for months. Though not so confused that they won’t get laughs. But I know that some people are not going to immediately pick up on the deeper thing that is happening. And there is no shame in that. This is very high concept. And that sentence is entirely serious.
  • There will be a paywall, because I have no other way to monetize, and this is going to be extremely expensive to operate. I am not doing superchats. This is tacky and grotesque, and no one serious does superchats. Can you imagine Tucker Carlson reading superchats? They are garbage content. (That said, we are toying with the idea of bonus “casual” shows with superchats and interactions with non-superchats. But no superchats on the real show. This is going to be very serious business.) Obviously there will be free shows as well, but some of them are going to have to be paywalled, because that is just the reality of the situation.
  • I can’t reveal a first date yet. I will say that I want it to be before Valentine’s Day. That is, before a year after I stopped regular Stormer Daily. I think it’s unlikely I’ll meet that date unless the stars really align for us, but it will be in that range. I can’t make any promises at all, but the closest thing to a promise I am willing to make is: “I’m pretty darn sure it will be up and running before summer.”
  • After a potential period of confusion, I promise that every Daily Stormer fan is going to love this. Unless I just totally suck. People have said I suck on podcasts, and I know that, but I am very good at content, and I am already filming myself and critiquing myself and working on a voice that is less mumbly. Oh and the other thing, just to be real, a lot of these podcasts people say I suck on were very late at night for me and I was usually “in the cups” as they say. Maybe also “in the xans” as they might also say. I’m going to arrange my schedule so when I’m streaming, I’m bright eyed and bushy tailed and on coffee alone. I mean I will probably drink on the show some, because it will be a party show where I drink with the audience, though I will not be getting “drunk” on the show. I am committed to giving the best performance possible, at any cost. And yes, it will get better over time, obviously, as I learn the new medium, but that is all this is: a new medium. The content will be the same, and I am very good at the content, so I just have to learn a new delivery mechanism.

As we get closer, I will be revealing more information, and also probably doing a donation drive, for the cameras and so on. The real cost is going to be the servers, which are going to be obscenely expensive. I might only have the archives of the free shows on torrent. We shall see. And even with the paywalled shows, I am going to beg anyone with the ability to use torrent (we’ll have a private tracker thingie where you have to have a sub to get the torrent). But we will have to provide downloads from servers for people who can’t use torrent, at least for the paid shows, and we will have to have the streams live on our servers. So it is going to be brutal, and there is no way I don’t lose money the first year (short of generous donations, which I am trying to figure out perks for that do not involve reading superchats on my show, which I will not do – unless there is a second casual show, which I am leaning towards, both because it is an added bonus for subs, it will allow superchats, and most importantly, it will allow more audience interaction and a chance for the audience to give us ideas about things we should be doing. And when you know the theme, you will be wanting to give ideas.)

We will be setting up a Telegram soon, so people can follow the happenings. I will also post photos on here.

Oh, and just to be clear: I am still going to write some stuff on the site. Right now, I am maniacal about the show, and it is hard to focus on anything else. But at the very least, every show will have a good long article attached to it when it is posted, talking about the topics. I’m still figuring out how that will be written, because if it is written before the stream, we may miss key elements, but I want to get the shows up fast with an article. So I will probably write an article based on the show notes, then edit it to add any spontaneous things that happened. Or, perhaps, it will not really be a summary of the show, but a written commentary on the themes of the show, and therefore can be written the day before it airs.

There is a very, very long list of details like this to work out.

But here’s the guarantee: if you like this website’s content, especially if you like classic Stormer and funny Stormer, you are going to love this show. Or your money back. No jk, I can’t give money back, everyone has to pay with crypto (which is now VERY EASY with Bitcoin on Venmo and Cash App and my system of individual addresses for every user, but it will not be possible to issue refunds, and even if it was, I wouldn’t do it.) But watch the free shows, and then you will know if you want to pay.

Also, I’m very interested in Nostr right now, and we may be doing the official chat on there. Both the free chat and the paid chat. Obviously, people who pay will get a separate chat. That’s another thing we’re figuring out, but check out Nostr. @jack actually delivered. No one thought it was going to happen, except for me. I always believed in him. And it is definitely the future.

Hopefully, some minor fraction of my excitement is coming across here. My true level of excitement is impossible to communicate, and you will not understand it until you see the show.

Get excited. This is real. Nothing but bullets can stop me at this point.

This is happening.

I love you all, and it is my love for you that drives me to do this. Also my midlife crisis. But mostly my love for you.

]]> This is Only Beginning to Begin https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/09/20/this-is-only-beginning-to-begin/ Sat, 20 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Yesterday’s piece was primarily about the “far right” pushing all of these mainstream narratives, but I am going to, probably on Monday, go through and show that it is the entire right doing all of these things they complained for like, a decade about the left doing. All of the “canceling.” Only with the right, they are going way beyond the left and saying that far from just getting people banned from social media and making it so they cannot ever work again (these crying faggots are literally getting waitresses fired, one waitress was fired for something her husband posted), they are saying they’re going to arrest everyone as well.

To be clear, this isn’t just the people who were posting TikTok’s of people cheering his death, but just people who said he was a racist. They are telling people to call and get people fired for saying that on their private social media accounts. These are the same precise people who had previously said this was the most evil thing ever.

The government fired Jimmy Kimmel. Despite the fact he was probably going to get fired anyway. The government came in and fired him.

I don’t know how retarded all these people are, or which ones are retarded and which ones are malicious feds. But nigga, what I do know is that Trump talked and talked about how he was going to fight “the left” and then when he took office, every single fucking thing was about Israel.

Did you know there is still no federal law against mutilating children in child tranny experiments? Maybe you didn’t know that. You probably did know Trump’s deportation rate is less than Obama’s and that there is no move whatsoever to criminalize hiring or renting to illegal immigrants, or to federally criminalize giving them free healthcare (I guess excluding real emergencies). This would obviously get rid of like 90% of them in a matter of weeks without the need to throw screaming women into vans in the church parking lot. But the federal government did take control of all American universities, and is forcing them to teach that Israel is God’s chosen and is only defending itself by genociding children. The Trump Administration has seized extraordinary executive powers, and all of it is either used for the sake of Israel, or is some stupid totalitarian spectacle.

These are the people who the far right and the normal right are begging to protect them from “the far left,” and supposing, or claiming to suppose, these powers will be used to stop the trannies. The fact that Trump didn’t move on day one to ban child mutilations should prove to even the drooliest retard that trannies are not the top concern.

So you’ve already seen what this guy does. We have these clips of “JD Vance” talking about a “debaathification” of the universities, then what you get is a “Zionization of the universities, while they still teach all the tranny and anti-white stuff.

So why would anyone think these new speech regulations would have anything to do with anything other than the Jews? How could any honest person, assuming they have any idea what is going on, think that?

The fact that the “far right” is going along with this is the most shocking, but “JD Vance” hosting Charlie Kirk’s show and encouraging people to hunt down and silence anyone who isn’t sufficiently emotional over Charlie’s death is nearly as bizarre. All of these other freaks, Matt Walsh, Christopher Rufo, all of the rest of the people who screamed “freeze peach,” are now literally doing the mirror world version of everything they said they opposed on principle.

Again, maybe they believe “the left” deserves this, or whatever, but even if you believe that, how can you believe it will actually happen? Trump’s people have shown zero interest in this. Look at the way they covered up Epstein. All of this stuff is only about Jews. The hate speech laws – and I think they are going to change the name, but still push through new speech laws – are only going to be used against enemies of Jews. Maybe some random trannies who literally mean nothing will be arrested (instead of putting them in an insane asylum where they should have already been), but it will all be about Israel.

Bef9re the Kirkocaust, there was that law against burning the American flag, and all of these people said “well if it’s illegal to burn the gay flag, I don’t care if they make it illegal to burn the American flag.” Firstly, it was never illegal to burn the gay flag, but okay, even if you believed that, then why not legalize burning the gay flag? Why take away more freedoms?

People are claiming I’m some kind of libertarian. Actually, I’ve supported Hitler, and I support present day Russia and China. I am not against “Statism.” I am against giving these kinds of new powers to a government that we know as a factual matter is completely controlled by Jews, which, demonstrably, uses any and all powers it has for Jewish purposes. How someone could fail to see that when they are saying “we’re doing hate speech now and canceling everyone who is a leftist” would not be a cover for more aggressive measures against people who are against Israel and the Jews. Could anything be more obvious?

It’s maddening.

Anyway, I had the Snitch Fuentes tweets and clips on hand going through these clips on hand, and gathering the clips of all of these more mainstream freaks is sort of a big project, but I will do it. Maybe on Monday or Tuesday.

For the record, I’m not really using a lot of AI. It is very useful as a research assistant. Much easier than search. I’m not using it for writing (except in the few cases I’ve done it as a joke, which I assume are obvious.), and anyway, finding clips on Twitter is still a nightmare. It’s shocking how badly Twitter works, in terms of search or discovery of any kind. It is apparently supposed to be an Insta style “doom scroll” app, but those of us with websites who need specific clips, which are primarily hosted on Twitter, have a helluva time.

But I’ll do it. I want this all on the record.

The Tucker Carlson Show on Kirk Changed My Mind

I have been both ultra critical of Carlson at points as well as supportive of him at other points. I have found that the claims he is a CIA agent amount to “his dad worked for the CIA” and “he says he tried to join the CIA and they rejected him.” I’m not necessarily opposed to being convinced of that theory, I just haven’t seen any serious evidence. What I’ve seen is a person who appears genuine, but who also has a rather low IQ ceiling, saying things that I mostly agree with and pushing the narrative of right-wing criticism of Israel very aggressively. I legit can’t see how that could be considered bad. (Please don’t come at me with “gatekeeper” and “limited hangout.” I don’t think you know what those terms mean. I do know what those terms mean. And thus far, they do not make sense to me with regards to Tucker. This is despite the fact that he’s done some things I’m very against, in particular pushing neocon type rhetoric about China.)

Whatever the case, I liked his show about Charlie a lot. I don’t know how anyone could really complain about it.

What effected me most was his claim that in private conversations he had with Charlie, he was saying he was trying to get out from under the boot of Israel, and was willing to lose all or most of his donors in order to take a moral stand on the Palestine issue.

I don’t think he was doing this much publicly. He was talking about it some, but being a college campus guy, it would have been impossible not to. And he was saying the “chosen ones, God gave the political state of Zionism to the chosen ones, even though Saint Paul explicitly said that the old convent was obsolete up until he died. But Tucker saying other things were going on in the background was very believable. And he did in fact allow Tucker to say the Epstein-Mossad thing at the conference, and then invited him to the next event, even while he was losing donors left and right and being called an antisemite.

Tucker also had on an Orthodox priest and said that Charlie was very interested in Orthodoxy, which obviously does not support the evangelical kookery that says “Christians were wrong for 2000 years and actually rabbinical Jews (followers of a religion that didn’t exist when Christ was crucified) are the chosen ones.”

Candace Owens, also a close friend of Charlie’s, is saying similar things.

The Conspiracy

Tucker is promoting the idea that Israel killed him with “I’m not saying that of course” type of wink-winking. I’m coming around to that point of view. Bibi coming out every day with a new statement about how he didn’t kill him doesn’t necessarily prove that, but it is the most bizarre shit I’ve ever seen.

Initially, the story – “random trans activist with Utah style gun skills kills Charlie because he’s too online” is believable enough.

The thing here is: we now have the government taking all of these insane actions, pushing this entirely new concept of “right wing cancel culture,” the “hate speech” stuff, and murmurings of an Ultra Patriot Act, which would no doubt involve Palantir and this AI police state control grid I’ve been talking about. They needed some event to make this happen.

I don’t think at time of writing there is enough evidence to prove the “lone gunman” theory, and I think the burden of proof is on the people pushing that narrative. They are not releasing much information on the alleged shooter. Trump just declared “Antifa” a terrorist group, though no one has even suggested that the shooter was a member of this group, or of any group. The only thing we know is that he was very online, and apparently had a tranny boyfriend. That’s all.

If I was going to come up with a conspiracy theory, I would not go into multiple shooters or whatever else. Although it is very strange that CNN and others made the stupid claim that the 3006 rifle could be assembled and disassembled in a matter of seconds. Then this Zinn Jew making the distraction. No one explained what the hell that was. It got memory holed until they reported he was arrested for child porn. There are several other weird things, such as why we only have grainy video when all of those cameras would have been in HD. Many other strange things to consider.

But there is mo need to get too kooky.

My theory would be that someone groomed him on Discord. That would be some intelligence agency that found a somewhat unwell individual and manipulated him over a period of months. They do this constantly. They get them in a “group chat” where the group chat is all feds, and they convince them they can be a hero. Then they explain to them how to do all of these necessary actions in order to make the thing happen.

No one is asking “cui bono?” Tranny activists certainly do not bono from this event. The Trump Administration does, and as the Trump Administration is effectively a proxy for Bibi Netanyahu, Israel does as well. A lot. I don’t think it is going to be called “hate speech,” but there are going to be new speech regulations, and the only people who will benefit from those are the Jews.

Shutting down universities, infiltrating TikTok, and buying CBS news is not enough to shut down criticism of Jews. You have to make it illegal or legally murky enough to create a chilling effect if you want people to really stop talking about the Jewish issue. And Charlie’s death creates that pretext.

It does not make sense to me that, understanding this, the Jews would simply wait around for some random trans activist to create the pretext. You would create your own pretext. And if you create a plausible situation, where even someone like me can say “well, the story kind of does make sense in a cut and dry way,” you can ram it through.

I initially said that if Israel was going to do it, they would set up a Moslem shooter. But that might be too obvious, and anyway, as you are witnessing in real time, this thing right now has the same effect without creating something absurdly obvious.

I’m struggling to believe it could be a cut and dry “lone gunman” situation. It’s just way too convenient and the lack of transparency makes no sense if it is cut and dry.

It feels like Dick Cheney and the Jews calling for “a new Pearl Harbor” months before 9/11. Like, wow, what fantastic luck.

To be clear: I don’t think the reason they would kill Kirk is that he was going to turn on Israel more aggressively. If Tucker is right and he was considering converting to Orthodoxy, then yes, that could be part of it. But the main reason would be to create this entire new social and political climate where all of the sudden, cancel culture is cool, and “hate speech” is on the menu (and in the longer run, the whole AI police state, which will also have elements of “classic police state” with the rollout of ICE and the flagrant violations of Posse Comitatus with the military running around everywhere.

“Most Men Alive” Gate

I suppose I need to address the fact that I have a headline on a relatively popular article that contains the phrase “one of the most men alive.”

Here’s the situation: I make mistakes like that all the time. I have always had some kind of dyslexia and now have a brain tumor. I have a staff member who is tasked with correcting this, as I honestly just can’t really do it. No one is perfect. He is currently still being paid his full salary, even though his workload is like, 4% of what it was. He doesn’t have a contract and I could just fire him, but he’s a good guy and also I have all thee future projects I might want him to work on.

But that was. Wow.

I am using normie memes from 15 years ago because apparently that is what the kids are into. I have no idea why the kids are into that. But who am I too judge? I just want to be cool by any means necessary.

By the time I realized it was up there like that, it was much to late to fix it, and I just had to play it off like it was some kind of meme no one but me understood.

I would have said “weaselly.” Which I think is true, even though the Tucker information has led me to believe he could have been planning to become less weaselly (which should be easy to do when you’ve already got $15 million or whatever, frankly). But nonetheless, at point of death, he was engaged in weaselism.

But the editor is great. The only good employee I’ve ever had, other than my sysop. And all the other good ones. Some of the others were good. But most of them ended up hating me.

I’m an impossible boss. I mostly refuse to even communicate with my employees. I never really wanted to be the manager of a company. I had a vision (actually a 30 year plan), before I was banned from everything and no longer allowed to use banks (just in case anyone doesn’t know this, I’ve not even been allowed to have a personal checking account since 2017, lol). I think I’m the single person never even accused of a crime who is on this type of list. A lot of people have now been “debanked,” but that is usually just their company, and they can usually just open an account at a different bank. I was going to hire a “CEO” to run the business side and deal with employees, because running a company is something I have never really had any interest in.

So, I’m a bad boss, and someone who will tolerate this and work with me and do a consistently good job is not someone I’m willing to let go easily, even if he is costing me money every month and not really doing much work since I stopped writing as much back in February.

Anyway, “Most Men Alive” is now a meme. I am going to start using it.

And in many ways, I think it is accurate to say that Charlie Kirk was indeed one of the most men alive.

RIP.

I’ve Got a Lot to Say

There is a bunch of stuff I need to say about all of this.

I joked that I was going to do a ripoff of Redbar’s podcast, and then a whole bunch of people were like “this is the best idea ever.” So I’m seriously looking into this.

If I’m the only even real nigga in this right wing game, and there be no other nigga even in the semi-real category, I need to do something other than post by-weekly blogs. That could actually be the best possible format.

I need to look into the technical side. I’ve also lived in like, four countries in the last three years, so that is kind of a thing to be considered. I can’t really build a serious set. But I can have mics and cameras that I can travel with, and a couple of monitors and a TV are not especially expensive.

I think I would charge $20 a month, do one show a week, and every other show would be free. So people would be paying $10 a show. But given that I can’t do advertisement, this is sort of just how it needs to be.

It wouldn’t be a complete ripoff of Redbar by the way. Firstly, it would be political content instead of comedy content. Aside from that, maybe 85% ripped off. It’s obviously going to be different, because I’m not Jewish and I can’t do that Howard Stern bit. Plus I don’t have the fashion skills. But I do think going through and watching all the podcasts with these right-wing people and criticizing them might be the best possible format for me to express my own views. But I don’t really see how this wouldn’t work. I think I would come across well on camera.

I have always said “you know, I spent my whole life building up these writing skills, so switching mediums doesn’t make sense,” but I’ve also built up analytical skills that do translate directly, and I think I could get the “on air” thing down within a year. Not that the first year would be horrible, but I think by the second year, I could really be rolling.

For those uncool people who are not familiar with Redbar, he goes through and investigates comedians, showing that they’re a bunch of weirdos, and pointing out what is weird about them, and it seems that would be an ideal platform for me to demonstrates what is wrong with all of this, and explain what should be different. After making that throwaway joke, it is becoming more serious in my mind.

People have said I’m not good at podcasting, but my podcast with Paul Town was getting like 20,000 downloads and we only made it three episodes. So I think I’m not that bad. And I think people would understand me a lot better on camera.

With Bitcoin on Venmo and Cashapp, I’m pretty sure anyone can figure out how to send Bitcoin to sub, and I’ve now got a system of using new BTC addresses to receive the money.

As of right now, I have like, no money. Well, I’ve got my own money from other work I do, but most of the donation money has been spent on lawyers and related stuff relating to the fact that this site has ruined my life. I’ve been thinking about a comeback, and settled on “books,” but while I am going to publish some books, this “right wing criticism podcast” seems to be a very good idea, and a way for me to make enough money to keep shit going. And allowing people to clip it, while also putting the free shows (every other show) on Rumble for as long as that lasts could really create a presence that I currently do not have because this website is so totally buried.

This is a big project. I know nothing about audio or video. So I’d have to figure all of that out, or find someone who understand it, and probably find a producer, a Jules figure, who doesn’t have an impenetrable ******* accent.

Let me know what you think in the comments. And don’t forget to like and subscribe and jingle my bells.

]]> Ten Days After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk, A New World Order is Coming Into View https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/09/19/ten-days-after-the-assassination-of-charlie-kirk-a-new-world-order-is-coming-into-view/ Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000

When Charlie Kirk died last Wednesday, I saw people having complete meltdowns, and felt it was my job to be the voice of reason. This came across as crass at the time, as people were really full of emotion at the time. If you were one of the emotional ones, and you go back now and read those articles today, I am certain you will have a different opinion of what I was doing there.

Yes, it was crass, but the crassness was a response to the emotionalism I was seeing everywhere I looked. What I was trying to do, hoping to do without much hope it would work, is ground people by pointing out that this might be emotional for you, but all that means is that the government is going to use this to push an agenda on you.

Here’s some of what I wrote the day after Charlie died (you can skip this, I hate quoting myself, but I need to make this point):

What I have seen, however, is that people are having a really, really serious emotional reaction to Charlie Kirk getting assassinated. Like, I read Twitter, and people are having emotional breakdowns, freaking out, calling for some kind of Super Patriot Act.

…

Right now, the Trump administration is building up this internal army in the form of ICE, and much worse, he is making these deals with Palantir. There were various social media accounts calling for Palantir to be “unleashed” on illegal immigrants. Now it’s calls for the entire power of the federal government, including our militarized law enforcement and Palantir, to be “unleashed” on “the left.”

How did that work out when the full force of the state was unleashed on “international terrorism”? Did that work out good for you? Did it work out good for the country?

…

To all of you having this emotional reaction: I admit, I do not understand what you’re going through. It seems to be very difficult. I don’t understand or respect that, but I can accept that it is what it is. But please. Relax. And think about what it is you are calling for. Look at this massive movement of all of these social media accounts demanding the federal government be unleashed on the public. Does it feel maybe a bit artificial? I mean, even if you’re feeling it, are you able to see how maybe there is something a bit nefarious going on here?

Can we think maybe just one step ahead here, and consider maybe what the consequences of giving intelligence agencies, paramilitary law enforcement, and private military contractors the ability to “hunt down domestic terrorists” might turn out perhaps not so good? Maybe it could in fact be like, the worst possible thing imaginable?

…

Anyway. Whatever. I guess I hope you enjoy your experience with these dark forces you are calling upon. And after all, who knows? Maybe the US federal government are the good guys this time and they’re really going to help you stop trannies or Islamofascism or whatever? Could be. Could be.

Screenshot this I guess so you can come back and mock me after giving over massive new powers to the government results in a great outcome, where your stupid woman emotions are satisfied after Israel and Peter Thiel build you a utopia where no one ever gets shot with a gun again.

And then:

The narrative from the right is daunting, with Trump in his video paying tribute to Kirk using the opportunity to call for some kind of unspecified crackdown, which we can only assume means even more egregious restrictions on speech and more military and militarized cops everywhere. There is a huge astroturf campaign to do the exact same thing the left did to the right when they claimed that “speech causes violence,” and therefore “speech is violence,” and therefore free speech shouldn’t exist.

Then, of course, as I’d said, on Tuesday, Pam Bondi, the perplexing Attorney General, came out with an announcement that we now have new hate speech laws in America, which she is going to enforce against anyone who is saying… whatever it is they might be saying.

That is wild, and really more than I was expecting. “Hate speech is not free speech” is an ADL-coined phrase that has been floating around on the left for decades, and was considered anathema to conservatives. Conservatives tend to believe in free speech, and they also tend to be aware that according to the Supreme Court, in multiple rulings, there is no such concept of “hate speech” in the United States.

But she, or rather the people who tell her what to say, apparently believed that the Charlie Kirk assassination video was emotionally distressful enough that the government can now roll this out.

As the day progressed, she partially walked it back, saying she just means “hate speech” as in violent threats. Violent threats, if they are immenent and actionable, are already illegal, and no one ever called that “hate speech.” She also said that people celebrating Charlie’s death was “hate speech” which she classified as illegal – in the clarification!

Again, this is way beyond what I was predicting. But there it is!

Just to be clear, Bondi is not any kind of ringleader here. Just watching her, you can see that this is a person who would struggle to be the manager of a Walmart, and would probably be out of her depth as the shift manager at a gas station. She has no idea what any of this means, and it is all coming from people behind the scenes.

But here’s the thing: The Big Guy is also on board. In an interview where he was asked about Bondi’s rollout of new “hate speech” laws, Trump gave tacit approval, saying that Charlie, who was obviously against hate speech laws, would support these laws now that he’s dead.

The apparent implication there is that if there had been hate speech laws in America, it would have prevented Charlie’s assassination, which obviously makes no sense.

Trump’s other comment so far on the issue was a kind of jokey thing about how the media should be charged with hate speech.

That isn’t really very funny, especially in light of the other clip, where he appears to endorse it.

It should be really easy to just say “no, we’re not doing that, she was misquoted” or whatever. So that is the direction things are going in, at the highest levels. Trump has already established a precedent where he is able to just make up laws out of nothing and no one can stop him, so it seems likely he’s going to try to enforce some kind of hate speech code. It’s certainly what his handlers in Israel want.

It makes no sense how Charlie’s death was even related to previous notions of hate speech, given that all of those related to a protected group. “Hate speech,” the term which Bondi and Trump are using, is an established term which means “criticism of a person based on their race, religion, or sexual orientation.” Multiple countries in Europe have laws which use this term, as defined. If Trump and Bondi want to come up with some new form of illegal speech, which has to do with criticizing people for their political positions (which would be the only thing that would relate to Charlie’s death), why not come up with some new term for their censorship program?

And how do you make it illegal to criticize someone’s political beliefs? That doesn’t even make any sense. That would be like, more or less 100% of political speech. It is difficult to imagine political commentary in America that isn’t in some form a criticism of the other side.

So, I think what you obviously have here is a situation where the Israel lobby wants to push through the “hate speech” laws that we’re all familiar with, the ones that make it illegal to criticize Jews and Israel (as well as blacks, trannies, and immigrants) while claiming it is somehow related to Charlie Kirk.

If We Compare Them to the Power of Government, Trannies on TikTok are Not Really a Very Big Threat to Anyone

I don’t know how many trannies or “far leftists” there actually are. I don’t think there are very many. I think it is possible they can do an assassination, as with Charlie Kirk (though I am coming around to the theory that the Jews did it). They can riot and break some store fronts. But they are not a massive military threat. Most importantly, they present nothing even close to the threat that the US government, which is controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley, present to the American people. Radical trannies present less than 1% or 1% of the threat the government presents.

Trannies present less than 1% of 1% of the threat black people present, frankly. This is seriously not a big issue. It’s been made a big issue by the media, but the idea that you have to beg the government to take your rights to protect you from trannies is absolute lunacy.

Therefore, to me, as an impartial observer, the idea of calling on the government to take away your rights to protect you from the trannies sounds completely insane to me. I can’t process how anyone of good conscious would think that is a good idea, which is why I can only really assume that the people calling for that are bad actors.

Full disclosure: the stream Nick Fuentes spent the first several years of his career more or less copying everything from me directly. Which is fine, I supported it. I supported him. He then got involved with Richard Spencer, who I believe is an FBI informant, and then with the confirmed FBI informant Charles Johnson (Johnson bragged about being an FBI informant). I’ve always had a hard line that I won’t support anyone who is involved with the FBI. The reasons for that should be obvious. But all I did was post on my semi-private chat forum that I would no longer be supporting him, because I don’t support people involved with the feds. He started attacking me on his show and implied he had blackmail material on me, which was utterly bizarre. I demanded he reveal it, on the semi-secret forum which he was reading to see my comments about him, and he instead just continually said nasty things about me, despite the fact I never posted about him on this main site. I didn’t post about him because in my experience, no one really cares if someone is an FBI informant, and exposing that doesn’t really do anything. I have no idea why people are not more concerned about that, but they aren’t.

I just wanted to lay that out for the sake of openness. It doesn’t relate to anything I’m going to say here. Well, the fact that he’s associated with the feds might relate. But that’s for you to decide, dear reader.

He’s become a kind of centerpiece of the Charlie Kirk assassination situation, and appears to be the heir apparent to the “young influencer” throne of Charlie Kirk. He’s gained hundreds of thousands of followers since the event.

When I was telling people this whole spectacle around the Kirk death was a government psy-op, I also pointed to the fact that Fuentes, who is supposed to be “far right,” was aggressively whining and calling for aggressive government action to shut down trannies or whatever.

He was pretty openly calling for some form of hate speech laws, demanding people be punished for their speech.

Here’s the first concerning tweet:

It’s obviously impossible for the government to ensure that some random person never murders another random person ever again. That is an insane comment. But the implication is obviously some kind of Ultra Patriot Act. It’s the same language used in the way of 9/11.

Then this:

You’d think anyone would see that and think “whoa, hey, slow down there. What?”

What would “crush left wing terrorism” involve, exactly? What are the potential things that this could imply? It’s a pretty short list, and everything on the list involves giving the government new and expansive powers, both to spy on people and to punish people for things they haven’t done yet.

And then:

At this point, anyone who isn’t in a complete state of total derangement is saying “hey, whoa, hey, hold up there buddy – did you just say you want to arrest people who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death? Because I don’t understand what that even means.”

Having read his posts and listened to some of his show, I think it means exactly what it says it means: he is calling for the arrest of people who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death. We have never heard anything like that before. I was completely shut down in 2017 for joking about – arguable, celebrating – the death of a fat woman at the Charlottesville rally. Millions of people laughed at this. And then I was totally deplatformed from everything forever. But I don’t remember even the most insane tranny calling for me to be arrested. This is something totally new that we’ve never heard from an “influencer” who now has 900,000 followers on Twitter. It is the most extreme call for government tyranny we’ve seen, ever.

But then look at this individual’s next tweet, in response to the above Pam Bondi tweet:

How is that not literally exactly what you were calling for?

What did it mean when you were saying people “must be held accountable” for cheering Charlie’s death? It is definitely not currently illegal to do that, so you were calling for some new form of restrictions on speech. But what. You just didn’t want it to be called “hate speech”?

Of course, it doesn’t really mean anything because none of this gibberish means anything, so I suppose it’s best not to think too much about it.

But here, following the timeline, he then tweets @FBI (!!!!!!) calling on them to arrest Jackson Hinkle for legal speech! Or, at least, for speech that was legal before the death of Charlie Kirk. We don’t really know what speech is legal now.

Here he is threatening Jackson with prison.

This is snitch level 9000. I never even imagined anyone could become this much of a public snitch and be celebrated for it. (Please see my premises relating to fake reality overriding classic reality to get an idea how this is possible.)

He went on to make it clear he is against free speech and wants the government, which by the way, as far as I know, he still argues is controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley, to crack down on speech.

The left, for what it’s worth, never actually made a major push to make speech illegal. Not in the way that Trump, Bondi, and Fuentes are doing. This is so very far beyond anything the left did. They just tried to get people banned from everything, and in some cases, sued them. That was very bad, but this push to arrest people, these new “hate speech” laws, newly minted top influencers tagging the FBI to arrest people for legal speech, this is all new. That should be understood.

All that is insane. But it is basic sellout type behavior. People didn’t care he was a fed. But a sellout? Is that something people will tolerate? Well, normies will. That is the goal here. He’s being groomed now as the new Charlie Kirk. He’s got an edgy past, where he was copying my shit, and that gives him some kind of street cred, but now he’s the “give the government the power to arrest people for speech” guy.

And here we get to the real meat:

It’s not about Israel! It’s not about Silicon Valley! No, no! Look over here – the trannies are the threat!

This is where it is all going. The government, which is run by Israel and Silicon Valley, is not the real threat. The real threat is trannies. And if we have to give up all our rights to a government controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley to protect us from the trannies, then so be it! It’s a small price to pay to stop this tranny menace!

At here’s where we take the shill train straight to Kook Town: this individual is promoting Russian bot conspiracies.

Whoooooooaaaaaa! Heeyyyyyyyy!

Russiagate is back, baby, and this time it is the edgy far-right guy doing the investigation!

That is some of the most hardcore “yikes” I’ve encountered in my day.

Here he is on video claiming anyone questioning the official story is a RUSSIAN!

Frankly, I thought the story made sense as just a tranny. But the extent to which this is being exploited by the government and shills like Fuentes makes me wonder.

Seriously, regardless if you believe the official story or not, trannies are not some massive threat, and Russia doesn’t have anything to do with anything. That, like “hate speech,” is a Democrat talking point that these people apparently think worked for the other side, so they might as well pick up the ball and run with it.

And this Fuentes character isn’t just some random Mexican I have beef with because he works with the feds. I wanted to get that out of the way at the beginning, reveal a potential conflict of interests in the coverage, but I would be saying this same thing if I had nothing to do with him ever. Just look at it.

You’re basically witnessing a coronation.

He is now on all the big shows, he is being defended by Matt Walsh and all of his supposed enemies. He just had a big appearance with Russell Brand. He is going mainstream, and he is saying the things necessary to go mainstream – “don’t worry about Israel and Palantir, the real threat is trans ideology!” and “Russia is behind all of this anti-Israel stuff!”

Here’s Ian Miles Cheong defending him.

That’s obviously the end of the argument. Honestly, I could have just started with that, and it would have explained the whole thing. There is nothing more damning than being defended by that guy.

This is all completely staged. You are witnessing the birth of the new shill of shills. That’s why he got all teary over Charlie. He’s in place to pick up all the Charlie fans. He’s cool with the youth, you know. Just check out his zany sense of humor. I don’t have any specific clips on hand, but just watch one of his four hour streams, and you’re going to see zany like you never thought humanly plausible.

Speaking of teary, Sam Hyde, another “far right” figure, one of the only ones left really, cried on video and called for some kind of Ultra Double Patriot Act to stop the trannies.

I like Sam Hyde, I even love Sam Hyde, but that is some of the cringiest tripe I’ve ever seen in my life. This is not the look for your brand, bro. You don’t want to be crying on video, firstly. No one wants to do that. Like, literally no one other than maybe women who are trying to get their boyfriend arrest for DV wants to be crying on video on the internet. And this idea, again, that the trannies are the real threat and the government – one more time, the same government which is entirely controlled by Israel and Silicon Valley – is going to save us from the tranny threat. What even is this? How many people have even met a tranny?

You can show these videos of people celebrating Charlie’s death on TikTok, but I think 80% of the people who were celebrating that posted it on social media. I do not think there is any kind of massive tranny threat.

Sam says that if Trump doesn’t like, send the military to arrest everyone against Charlie Kirk in the next two weeks – he keeps saying this two week deadline – that the world will end or everyone will die or something. It’s wild. It’s almost like parody.

Remember when Reagan was shot by a guy who was in love with Jody Foster? Can you imagine if there were calls to give the government huge new spying, censorship, and policing powers to crack down on people in love with Jody Foster? Honestly, that sounds ridiculous, but there were probably more people in love with Jody Foster then as there are radical trannies now. I mean, she looked great in Taxi Driver.

Wait, hold on. My producer just notified me that Jody was only 12 in Taxi Driver, and said I should retract that statement. But we’re just going to keep moving.

With Sam, I don’t want to attack Sam. Everyone shits the bed once in a while. I have. Not like that, ever. But you know, sometimes you miss, I guess. People are also saying he stopped doing steroids recently and that can definitely make you emotional. So, okay. I’m not putting him in the same category as Fuentes.

But what do we have going on here?

This is at best a mass hysteria like coronavirus being exploited by the same bad actors.

Tucker Carlson as a Voice of Reason

Maybe Tucker Carlson is some kind of secret agent as well, I don’t know. I have no idea. But I can say his response was measured and reasonable.

Unlike Fuentes and a lot of these other creeps, he said we cannot tolerate any form of restrictions on speech as a result of this event, and basically said people should rise up if Trump tries to push this through.

Tucker’s whole show about Charlie was touching and helped me to understand him better and sympathize with him. He had an Orthodox priest on saying that it’s our belief that the dead should be let to rest for forty days before we start making any kind of judgements about what the death means. And Tucker’s explanation of Charlie’s behind the scenes with him about Israel was convincing.

Tucker is doing a kind of “I’m not saying Israel killed him of course, WINK WINK WINK.” He is definitely on that train, but he’s not just going to say it, because that’s not really his style.

I’m still not totally convinced Israel did it, but I will tell you, the lone shooter theory is looking less and less likely as I look at how aggressively this whole machine is using this event. Of course, they’re going to use any event, but this has become such a big thing that it seems like something you wouldn’t wait for to happen randomly.

I think what is very likely is that the tranny was in Discord channels, and was groomed by someone from some intelligence agency who explained to him how to do all of this. Again, lone gunman is technically possible, but just look at what is happening. It is Kirk Crackdown Mania.

Who’s Left?

What voice of reason exists now? Frankly, I thought Sam was one, then a few weeks ago he interviewed Fuentes, and I was like “ugh.” Then he goes full Kook Train to Bonkersville (please bring your own tissues) with this Charlie thing.

I am not seeing a voice of reason, at all. Tucker is the closest thing. And I’ve certainly aired my complaints about him, which are many, and some of which are rather serious.

I think Theo Von is our man. And that is why, through the powers invested in me by being the only remaining member of the original alt-right, I am hereby anointing Theo Von as the absolute leader of the right-wing.

I can’t go out on that joke. Too stupid. Not really funny at all, actually. Though to be honest, I sometimes do feel like Theo is only person on the internet who isn’t completely full of shit. But you know he’s like, close friends with RFK Jr. And what does that even mean? What are they talking about? What would they have to talk about, other than for RFK to send through government talking points? Tim Dillon is having meetings with “JD Vance” (fake name, btw).

The problem is:

  • People love money
  • People don’t want to go to prison or be murdered

“You can have a bunch of money and we won’t put you in prison or murder you” is the ultimate deal. It’s an offer you can’t refuse.

Unless you’re me, I guess. But I am deranged. Seriously. I’m one of the sickest people I know, and I was even before this brain tumor. I do not consider the fact that I’m the only one among these hundreds of internet people that has actually kept it real to be a sign of integrity but rather a symptom of mental illness. Because I will tell you, from 15 years of experience: this is totally fucking pointless. It is something to suffer for a purpose, there is value in that. Suffering for no purpose at all is just stupid or insane. For me it’s mostly the latter. I would like to think.

I should have started a landscaping company.

Anyway, I hope everything works out

I’m sure it’s probably all fine.

]]> Hold On a Second. https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/09/18/hold-on-a-second/ Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000

I’ve got a lot of material on the new hate speech laws and the fact that these supposed “far right” individuals have cheered it on and then are now pretending they’re not cheering it on while continuing to cheer it on.

I’m going to drop a bomb on all of this. I promise you.

I am working on it. Also, I’m fasting again, and about to hit the euphoria phase where I will be working at a hardcore pace.

Don’t worry. I got you. Trust me. I see all of it.

Shocking, really, how correct I was about this whole thing, no?

Truly.

How could I know?

It’s because I live in classic reality, so everything is obvious to me all the time.

I think this should drop tomorrow.

This is the most insane thing I’ve ever seen. These people are saying the biggest threat to the universe is trannies and women on TikTok so we should give all power to the fucking ZOG.

I am thinking of becoming a Redbar style critic of all of these far right homos. I think it may be the time. I don’t really like to do video, but I look fantastic. I’d have to get some money for that. But I think I can pull it off. You’re all just going to have to pay me with crypto, but I can take bitcoin from Venmo or Cashapp now because of my genius plan to produce new addresses for everyone so you can’t get doxed for paying me.

But I’m talking about a subscription podcast with video. I think this is where this is all going. I haven’t concluded that and I would need a studio and the first year would be not great but I could become the master in this world of mugus.

There are no voices left other than me. I am the last man standing. I’ve pointed out that people are feds for years and no one really cares. You know what people care about? Selling out. And we are seeing the biggest sellout since… let me think of something extreme… oh, when Kurt died and Dave made the shittiest drooling pop rock tripe career off of Kurt’s corpse. That is the sellout level. You think “oh Anglin use a more current reference, half your audience doesn’t even know what Foo Fighters are” – but there is no sellout on that level in the years since.

I don’t want to spoil it. But a new era has begun. I used to think it would be wrong to put my informations behind a paywall because the public deserves the information, but I’ve realized the public doesn’t deserve the information because they won’t do anything with it and therefore I should just charge.

The Redbar model is my inspiration. I will host my own videos. And you will have to pay for them. People can clip shit and post it wherever, but if you want the whole shows, you’re going to have to pay a lot. I mean big bucks, like $20 a months unless you have a coupon and then the clips will go viral and I will get more and more subs and I will be able to say nigger and everything.

I will need a tech team and a studio so I am going to need to do a donation drive, but the donators will get subs. I’m talking about the full thing. I am going to go through and clip all these people and analyze them under a microscope and it is going to be a menace. Just a complete ripoff of Redbar, zooming on faces, all of it. Except about political cringe and scams and sellout and obvious crimes.

It looks like this is goign to be illegal. But hey, I don’t know man. What am I supposed to do? Jus shut up? I’m not doing that. Fucking arrest me, okay? I’m not doing this hate speech shit all these people called for and then when they got it said “whoa whoa whoa.” And then kept supporting it.

I think I have this skillset.

I am doing it. Well, I’m thinking of doing it and leading into it.

But yeah, next big expose coming in, then we’re moving to buidling the studio and figuring out what all this shit with the mics and cameras is. I’ll do a donation drive for people who want this. Maybe no one wants this, but I’m pretty sure everyone does, and I need the money anyway.

I’m going after everyone. No limites. This is going to be a holocaust of the faggot ass fake right-wing sellout movement, which is literally everyone but me.

This is coming. Six years of Xanax and I am switching to Vyvanse, baby. Max out the hatred as well as the love, we are maxing it all out, we are doing podcasts, we are charging a lot of money, we are exposing them all in the most disgusting ways imaginable.

Oh my God I just heard someone say “pizza.” Holy frigging gut punch.

I am coming.

]]> Definitive Proof Charlie Kirk Assassination was AI Deepfake https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/09/13/definitive-proof-charlie-kirk-assassination-was-ai-deepfake/ Sat, 13 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000 WARNING TO READERS:

Honestly, I’m really bored of this Charlie Kirk situation. I want to watch the Tucker Carlson interview with Sam Altman and write about that. I just read a book about him that says he raped his sister and is a cult leader, and I’m really a lot more interested in that than this ongoing Israel bullshit, of which Charlie Kirk is a part.

I would like to say this will be the final word, but it won’t be, because as you’ll see, our society is going to drastically change as a result of the lunatic emotional hysteria over Kirk’s death.

Hopefully, now that the dust has settled, we can all sit down and have a serious conversation about the voice of a generation of young and upcoming Zionist shills dying tragically. The headline is, unfortunately, not representative of the content herein. The better name of the post would have been “Charlie Kirk: A New Pearl Harbor.”

We just need a sitrep. Or, most people apparently do. I don’t, because this was all obvious to me when it happened, but a lot of people got all flustered by the video of the shooting.

Firstly, we should note that the alleged killer was caught, and it appears to be some kind of “evil twin” type situation:

Anyway, he’s an anarcho-tranny leftist or a fascist Trump supporter or whatever. Who knows. Who cares.

It pretty much looks like an acceptable “lone gunman” situation, though he was on Discord with someone, meaning it could have been instigated by someone. I wouldn’t really be totally surprised if the feds set this up, for reasons I’ll get to later.

I saw people accusing Israel of being responsible and kind of laughed. That sounded ridiculous, but it is awesome that now any time anything happens, everyone is just like “well, it must be the Jews again!” Bibi Netanyahu has been going around, doing a full press media tour about how he was Charlie’s best friend and he was the best friend of Israel and this was basically another attack on Israel. So clearly Bibi is exploiting the situation. But I don’t really think that means he did it. Charlie was the only popular pro-Israel young conservative. Apparently Ben Shapiro is saying he’s going to replace Kirk as leader of TPUSA, which really does not help Israel. That is going to be a complete mess: Shapiro, surrounded by Mossad agents, with snipers on the rooftops, doing “prove me wrong” on campus is going to make people hate Jews way more than they do now.

But yeah, don’t get mad at me: I’m open to conspiracy theories, if those seem to become more likely as more information comes out, but the “official story” currently seems to provide a sufficient explanation: “young guy who grew up in Utah around guns started getting into leftist stuff on the internet, and like all young men in America, was emotionally unstable, planned what amounted to a very easy assassination.”

With that out of the way, I guess I need to start with making it clear, again: I’m not “celebrating” Kirk’s death. That would of course be “ghoulish” as many, many, many have noted. What I am not going to do is pretend I feel really sad about this, and that it’s really such a horrible and awful tragedy this guy that everyone hated while he was alive getting assassinated really means a lot to me. I understand you are getting spammed with his photos of his kids.

I was especially moved by his wife telling someone to record her crying over his casket and then post it online.

Very normal, to have someone film a close-up of you crying over your dead husband’s corse so people can post it with emojis online. “Hey, I’m going in to mourn, come film and it make sure to really get up in their with the closeup, normal people like this and will want to post it with emojis on the internet,” said she. I’m sure this is emotionally moving and very normal to normal people.

But listen, dude. I am also not going to act like all the people screaming and crying about this don’t look like babies, or that the emotionalism and moralizing I’ve seen over the last few days doesn’t disgust me. I think it’s shameful. No one thinks people should get shot or whatever, but come on. Man-up. Saying “ghoulish” is not a magical incantation that means everyone has to throw a fit and moralize over someone no one even liked getting shot. You don’t have permission, as an adult man, to get all whiny about this and moralize people.

I’m against kill people, I didn’t “celebrate” Kirk’s death, and I have respect for his kids and his freak exploitation wife and blah blah blah. I’m not going to accept that I’m a bad person for not really caring because you used the “ghoul” incantation against me.

If you’re going to have an emotional breakdown, you should have an emotional breakdown over the implications of this clear plan by the establishment to turn Charlie Kirk into a saint because he got shot. He was not a saint. Whether alive or dead, he was a totally poisonous figure who I doubt any of my readers agreed with on much of anything.

The pedophile journalist and friend of the site Michael Tracey has a good analysis up and who Charlie Kirk actually was, where he also takes the position that telling people “it’s too soon” to talk about who Kirk actually was is childish and dumb and doesn’t serve the public interest but is rather an emotional manipulation campaign by people who aren’t really particularly interested in what Kirk stood for but rather only interested in promoting this new narrative that Trump should use leftist style authoritarianism to blame “the left” as a movement for Kirk’s death. He says that Kirk was a scumbag shill, and getting shot doesn’t change that. Which is true.

The narrative from the right is daunting, with Trump in his video paying tribute to Kirk using the opportunity to call for some kind of unspecified crackdown, which we can only assume means even more egregious restrictions on speech and more military and militarized cops everywhere. There is a huge astroturf campaign to do the exact same thing the left did to the right when they claimed that “speech causes violence,” and therefore “speech is violence,” and therefore free speech shouldn’t exist.

Here’s a Republican Congressman saying he’s going to use government authority to get everyone banned from the internet for life if they don’t like Charlie Kirk:

Anna Paulina Luna, who you may remember masturbating to as she babbled incoherently about “interdimensional creatures” on the Joe Rogan show a few weeks ago, was calling up and threatening every tech company to take down messages critical of Kirk, and she says they all complied.

Although I really enjoyed masturbating to the show, this bitch is literally retarded. She was barely making it through Joe’s softball questioning about the nature of these interdimensional creatures she claims to have evidence exist.

You have retards and women fronting for a huge Jewish agenda to vastly transform America.

You might be fat and stupid enough to think “oh but I want to shut down the left like they shut down us,” but are you really fat and stupid enough to believe that this won’t just mean “silencing criticism of Israel”? If you are that stupid, you should probably just do fentanyl and play video games, because you are not fit to participate in society. Of course any crackdown on “the far left” in America is going to be about shutting down criticism of the Jews. It’s not going to be about stopping trannies. Kirk himself was pro-tranny.

He viewed it as one of his main goals to transform “Christian conservatism” into a virulently pro-homosexual movement, and he was constantly on tour with various “gay conservatives,” including “right-wing trannies.”

The Republicans don’t care about stopping trannies.

It wasn’t that long ago that Trump was saying he was going to make universities stop being woke, then the entire thing – literally, the entire thing – turn out to be about shutting down criticism of Israel. And because conservatives are fat retards, they cheered it on, as the government literally took over the curriculums of universities, outlawing criticism of Israel and Jews.

Post-Kirk is big post-911 energy.

I am not saying it’s going to be as extreme as the post-9/11 crackdowns, but they are going to do a whole bunch more anti-free speech stuff, a whole bunch more stuff with expanding the cops. At some point, there is going to be an announcement that “ICE isn’t just about immigrants.” I can promise you that. This massive army is not being built up in the US to deport immigrants. Trump’s administration is still failing to meet Obama’s numbers, they’re they don’t really have that much interest in deportations, and they’re building an internal military force, to be bigger than all other federal law enforcement organizations combined.

If the government wants to do things you don’t like, they have to make it look like they are doing things you do like. I still don’t really understand how that is complicated to anyone. But when they’re talking about “ideas kill people” and it’s time to crack down on ideas and they’re building a massive internal militarized fed cop force, and releasing the military on the streets – this is not going to go somewhere you will enjoy.

And yet, the government and influncers are demanding the government “do something” to ensure no one ever gets shot again?

What does a world where “no one can ever be killed again” look like, I wonder? Seems like you would really need a lot of spying and cops, no? Some kind of, you know, like, AI control grid? To predict human behavior?

I think “wow faggot, a world where no one dies?” should be the normal response. But we appear caught in a storm here. A gay storm of baby tears.

It’s all ridiculous and it’s boring. And it’s unstoppable, which makes it that much more boring. The masses of people really are goyim, and all the government has to do is trigger them emotionally, and they will do whatever.

As I said, I don’t really think the Kirk assassination was a conspiracy, but when I see all of these government officials, all of these influencers, all getting on board, saying it’s time to crack down on dangerous ideas, I can understand how someone would think that. And I’m not really dismissive of the idea.

Here’s the thing: the technology exists now to create a total AI control grid. The government is going to do whatever they have to do to get this implemented in America. They will do things to make it happen, and they will exploit whatever happens. But you have all seen that Donald Trump is an old man barely holding it together, and the administration is run by Israel and Silicon Valley, and you can just go look at what these people are saying they want to do.

Anyway. I’m gonna go watch the Altman interview. Because that is more important to me.

To end on a more positive note, I just want to say that I understand a lot of people really experienced an emotional reaction to the Kirk shooting, and I just want you all to know that I think you are gay little babies who need to grow the fuck up. Seriously. It’s embarrassing. If you can’t handle seeing someone get shot without feeling the need to throw a fit and start whining and moralizing and talking about how “it wasn’t just the shooter responsible for the shooting,” you are not an adult and you are always going to do more harm than good. You’re not a revolutionary, bro. You’re not even a man.

On an even more positive note: Whatever. I don’t care.

This one goes out to Charlie:

]]> Charlie Kirk May Have Lost His Status as “One of the Most Men Alive,” But Will be Remembered as an Evil Villain https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/09/11/charlie-kirk-may-have-lost-his-status-as-one-of-the-most-men-alive-but-will-be-remembered-as-an-evil-villain/ Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000
No wonder the shooter missed his face

Apparently, seeing some guy get shot in the neck is traumatizing for many people. I don’t really know why, given the level of desensitization we’ve all experienced. I mean, it really seems kinda nuts, the fact that this is being considered such a big deal.

I really would have preferred if the Yankees would have held a moment of silence for Iryna Zarutska, a brutal murder victim who wasn’t trying to destroy my country for the Jews.

But okay.

The thing here is, Charlie Kirk was playing a game which he apparently didn’t understand the stakes of. When you are involved in politics, and you are out there encouraging wars and celebrating killings, you are voluntarily involving yourself in a game where people die. To imagine that you are able to work to get untold numbers of people killed by promoting the mass murder machine, and yet somehow never have to worry about that coming back on you, is totally confusing and deranged.

He was promoting and celebrating the deaths of people all around the world, mostly Israel’s enemies, but others as well, and the idea that a person can do that without understanding they are making themselves a target is obscene.

Personally, I used to get death threats from Ukrainians all the time. It was not something that offended me, as it just seemed like something that would obviously happen. Obviously, I don’t want to be killed, so I take precautions, but if I ever were killed, I would understand, while bleeding out, that I played the game and knew the stakes and that’s the way the cookie crumbles. I would not expect people to whine about how unfair my death is, because frankly, it wouldn’t really be unfair, would it? If I’m supporting other people dying, which I certainly have been during the Ukraine war, I’ve involved myself and understood the implications. I would hope only that the Russians would vow revenge, which they’ve done for all civilians who have been murdered by Ukrainians.

The crocodile tears over Charlie Kirk’s death from people like washed up basketball star Barack Obama, Israeli dictator Bibi Netanyahu and bulbous forced meme Nick Fuentes are truly repulsive.

I agree that how we respond to this moment is important. I wouldn’t include “watershed” or “profound” in that sentence. But if you respond like a faggot, you look like a faggot, and people will think you’re a faggot.

People die, bro. Sometimes they get shot in the neck and blood squirts out like a fountain. It’s not really that big of a deal, and if the person is a sickening shill for the Jews, it might actually be sort of hilarious. Not hilarious to me of course because I’m a really good person and I want everyone on the internet to know that I’m a really good person who is really upset when anyone dies. But some other people might find it hilarious.

Charlie Kirk was one of the single most fiendish men working in American cultural manipulation. His evil acts go far beyond being literally the only non-Jew under 50 promoting the super-hardline Zionist narratives like “there are no starving Gazans, it’s a staged hoax and “Israel has never targeted civilians.” Like, literally no one says that sort of stuff anymore, and hasn’t in like a year, and he was out there just reading Netanyahu press releases as fact every single day.

But let’s go back a bit. Much has been said about Kirk’s advocacy for using sanctions to force people in Africa to have gay sex.

But at the same time, he was aggressively attempting to manipulate the American right-wing young into accepting homosexuality as compatible with Christian values. He brought all kinds of homosexuals into his “Turning Points USA” group and promoted them and would berate people who claimed this was against Christian values.

Bizarrely, while for most Israel shills, the tranny issue is the only thing they really stand hard against, Kirk said that he is fine with trannies he just don’t want non-binaries. “There are two genders, pick one” he said, telling trannies just to stick to classic trannyism instead of believing there is a “gender spectrum.”

That is notably much further than the likes of Bari Weiss or Ben Shapiro have ever gone on the tranny issue. Typically, these Israeli agents decide, “well, we can’t just only talk about Israel all the time, so we need some other issue,” and choose the tranny thing. Kirk couldn’t stick to that.

He was a key proponent of the idea that “America is an idea” and not a real country. Here he is speaking in Israel in 2019 saying that America is just “ideas,” but that Israel is a real country because it is holy.

At one point, he called for fifty million “legal” immigrants. He also invented the “staple green cards to diplomas” meme.

I believe that was in 2020. I don’t know if he backed down on that, maybe he did, but he never apologized for it.

Literally, this man’s entire career was about manipulating American Christian values, flipping them on their head, coercing people to believe the opposite of what right-wingers have always believed. At least, that was his main goal before October 7th, at which point he pretty much just only talked about Israel and how we have to support them genociding Gazans or we will have Sharia Law in America.

Oh, and he was supporting all of those other wars too. Most recently, he was spamming Twitter about how great it was Trump blew up that boat he said was a drug boat without any evidence, praising the Cuban spy Marco Rubio as a hero for killing these randos as part of a plan for regime change in Venezuela.

And of course he was promoting regime change in Iran.

The one war he was actually against was the Ukraine. Some people are now saying a Ukrainian could have assassinated him, and that is actually possible. It seems more likely it was a tranny or an intelligence agency who is going to blame it on Iran. It’s possible that it doesn’t matter who it was, they will just blame Iran.

People are calling it “ghoulish” to celebrate Kirk’s death, and I suppose celebrating anyone’s death could be considered “ghoulish.” But getting assassinated doesn’t someone make you a good person, regardless of what you did in life. We’re all of course against political violence for some reason no one has really explained and have to keep saying that, so of course I too must say “I am so against political violence for some reason,” but America is better off without Charlie Kirk. And he is going to be really, really hard to replace. Again, I cannot think of any non-Jew under the age of fifty who is willing to go around talking about “Israel is our greatest ally, they’re fighting Hamas over there so we don’t have to fight a Hamas invasion of America, there aren’t any war crimes, the food blockades are a hoax, no one is starving, most moral army.” He was on the level of Sean Hannity. You don’t see anyone doing that.

But no, I don’t feel sad Charlie Kirk died, and I’m not going to post some social signally thing about “oh woe is me, political violence, oh the horror, can’t we just vote for change???”

You can post six million pictures of his wife and kids. I’m not doing the bit with the rest of these people.

A New Era of Political Violence?

I’m not the only one who’s been saying that because democracy is a totalitarian system where the public has no ability to petition grievances – they just tell you to vote for one of two parties that are basically the same – if there are significant grievances that people want petitioned, when they realize these grievances cannot be petitioned, they are going to start shooting and blowing things up. Actually, I think pretty much everyone with any basic comprehension of human realities has been saying that.

Because it is something inevitable, there is no real way to assign any kind of value judgement to it. You can say “violence is bad,” which seems childish and without any intrinsic meaning. You can certainly say “I wish it wouldn’t have come to this,” but again, it was always going to come to this. Democracy can work if people don’t have any real grievances, if you give them a job and a house and a car and a wife and a dog. They will not think very much about the government. But as soon as things get hard for people, when people get frustrated, and they realize that they have literally no ability to use the system to change anything, they are going to become violent.

Now you have the Luigi thing. You have this Charlie Kirk thing. Who knows how bad it is going to get, but it’s obvious that there isn’t going to be less political violence going forward.

It feels a bit like complaining about the weather. It’s hard to really know what else to say.

In terms of the political implications, yes, I think it will lead to more police state type measures, but then more police state type measures will lead to more violence by random individuals. A police state can’t really stop that. Maybe a Palantir pre-crime system can stop some of it, but the more you push on people with these kinds of openly tyrannical measures, the more people are going to feel they’ve no opinions, and the more violent they are going to become.

I’m sure there are a lot of simulations about how this will all work, but the simulations are mostly going to be done by companies that are trying to sell physical and digital police state equipment to the government.

I think it’s safe to say that it’s not going to be a very fun time. Beyond that, predictions are difficult.

]]> Jeez, You’d Have Thought They Assassinated Bob Hope https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/09/11/jeez-youd-have-thought-they-assassinated-bob-hope/ Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Look, guys.

I’m not going to recant anything about saying Charlie Kirk is a shitbag and I don’t really care he’s dead. I never said he deserved it, or that killing people is good, or whatever. But I just really don’t understand what the difference is between him dying and Ben Shapiro dying, and the whole thing just really didn’t seem like that big of a deal.

So. No. I’m not apologizing for not caring, and I’m not retracting the statements saying “I don’t know what you people thought was going to happen, of course political violence was going to get worse, what other possible option existed?”

Further, I’m not going to retract the fact that to me, all the people whining about this sort of looked like complete pussies, and that it feels like anyone who has gotten really upset about this didn’t have any real understanding of the stakes, and that this is the epitome of “first world problems.”

Further, I’m not going to go through my own personal experiences with violence, as it doesn’t really matter, and it would sound like I was trying to sound like I’m some kind of badass, which is not really how I view myself. But I guess I can just say that I’ve lived in countries where people get killed, and no one has a freakout.

And even further, I’m not going to retract the statement of fact that if you inject yourself into public narratives where you’re publicly calling for mass death, as Charlie Kirk did when he cheered on and went around publicly promoting the genocide in Gaza, that you aren’t inserting yourself into something that is very serious, and you should really be obligated to understand the gravity of that.

If there is one thing I am willing to concede, it is that people do this all the time in America, go around promoting mass killings, and don’t expect to get shot over it, and I don’t think it is necessarily something they should expect.

But wow. Having read the responses to this. I feel completely and totally out of touch here.

What I have seen, however, is that people are having a really, really serious emotional reaction to Charlie Kirk getting assassinated. Like, I read Twitter, and people are having emotional breakdowns, freaking out, calling for some kind of Super Patriot Act to hunt down supposed enemies of… Zionism? I mean, they’re saying “enemies of America,” but is Charlie Kirk, the “America is an idea but Israel is a real country” guy really representative of America? Because he had a flag in his bio or whatever?

I just can’t believe how emotional people are getting, and it is definitely not proportionate to the amount of love they had for Charlie Kirk when he was alive. I guess it’s a martyr situation, or whatever. But I mean, jeez. Is it really that big of a deal? And were people somehow not expecting this sort of thing?

I don’t have this emotional investment. Maybe I’m a psychopath. I don’t really think I am. I think it’s more just, you know, people die all the time? We’ve all seen a lot of videos of people dying? I don’t know what to say, because I don’t understand where these emotions are coming from.

This is the vibe I’m seeing from these accounts, most of which are ostensibly run by adult men:

Let hey, bro. Chill. It was just Charlie Kirk.

All of this emotion is totally embarrassing.

It’s not great.

At time of writing, there is still no suspect. But people are assuming it is some left-winger. I think most people seem to be assuming it is a tranny. But what they are calling for is giving the government, the cops, new dictatorial powers. It’s a 9/11 type thing, where people are saying “please take my freedoms to protect me.” And it looks very whiny and pathetic to me. I’m looking at these tweets and it’s like, yo, man-up, bro. Relax. Sometimes people get shot in the neck and blood squirts out everywhere. That’s part of the adult world.

Right now, the Trump administration is building up this internal army in the form of ICE, and much worse, he is making these deals with Palantir. There were various social media accounts calling for Palantir to be “unleashed” on illegal immigrants. Now it’s calls for the entire power of the federal government, including our militarized law enforcement and Palantir, to be “unleashed” on “the left.”

How did that work out when the full force of the state was unleashed on “international terrorism”? Did that work out good for you? did it work out good for the country?

To all of you having this emotional reaction: I admit, I do not understand what you’re going through. It seems to be very difficult. I don’t understand or respect that, but I can accept that it is what it is. But please. Relax. And think about what it is you are calling for. Look at this massive movement of all of these social media accounts demanding the federal government be unleashed on the public. Does it feel maybe a bit artificial? I mean, even if you’re feeling it, are you able to see how maybe there is something a bit nefarious going on here?

Can we think maybe just one step ahead here, and consider maybe what the consequences of giving intelligence agencies, paramilitary law enforcement, and private military contractors the ability to “hunt down domestic terrorists” might turn out perhaps not so good? Maybe it could in fact be like, the worst possible thing imaginable?

There’s also the possibility that they’re going to tell you Iran killed Charlie Kirk. Who knows the likelihood. But whether it is “domestic terrorism” or just a redux of the “Islamic terror” threat, it seems like we should probably all just relax and just allow for the prosecution of the individual or individuals responsible, instead of going into lunatic memes invented by the left about “stochastic terrorism”?

I’m just really not so sure we can trust these Jews that run the US government, quite frankly.

But hey. Honestly, I don’t even know why I’m bothering writing this. I guess just for my own conscience. Because I can already see where this is going. It’s all very clearly laid out. Whether it goes with “domestic terror” or “Islamic terror,” the entire right-wing is begging to surrender their freedom to a brutal Jewish police state apparatus ostensibly run by this White House that is co-owned by Israel and Silicon Valley. That is going to happen, for the same reason the “war on terror” happened, for the same reason “coronavirus” happened. Because the masses of people will just go along with whatever.

For the record, it’s clear now that the shooting was done by some kind of government asset for this exact purpose of whipping everyone into a frenzy. I didn’t realize the kind of frenzy that was going to be whipped up, or I would have called that immediately.

Anyway. Whatever. I guess I hope you enjoy your experience with these dark forces you are calling upon. And after all, who knows? Maybe the US federal government is the good guys this time and they’re really going to help you stop trannies or Isalmofascism or whatever? Could be. Could be.

Screenshot this I guess so you can come back and mock me after giving over massive new powers to the government results in a great outcome, where your stupid woman emotions are satisfied after Israel and Peter Thiel build you a utopia where no one ever gets shot with a gun again.

Because that’s the goal, right? You whining fucking faggots? A world where no one can ever get shot with a gun?

]]> Homosexual Rights Activists Panic After Genocide Promoter Charlie Kirk’s Neck Gets Blown Open https://www.anglinarchive.com/2025/09/10/homosexual-rights-activists-panic-after-genocide-promoter-charlie-kirks-neck-gets-blown-open/ Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000 At first I was like:

But then a few hours later, I was just like:

Mass immigration activist, genocide defender, and international homosexual enforcer Charlie Kirk just got his neck blown out in Utah.

He was just like “well there are only two genders so if you’re going to be a tranny just be a tranny not non-binary and we have to really stop these drug cartels because of the narcoterrorism but we need the immigrants from India for the tech sector – prove me wrong” and then it was like “BLEGH!” and carotid artery just opens up and starts squirting blood like an old-fashioned water pump.

It’s really sad someone would get their neck blown out like that. I feel such sad feelings when I feel these sad feelings in my heart.

Charlie Kirk, known to his friends as “Chucky K,” was a staunch defender of Jews, immigrants, and spreading homosexuality in Africa.

He BOOM’d Botswana with anal sex, then someone BOOM’d his throat open.

This is so scary and terrible, and many homosexual activists are expressing their sentiments of love on social media platforms.

“One of the most horrific things”? Been catching any of those gaza vids, breh? A war Charlie Kirk supports?

What goes around comes around, ey? That includes bullets, nah?

“We need Jesus to keep people from killing people who force the blacks to do anal on each other” might sound like a confusing sentiment, but only if you’re not American. Americans find this very normal.

I doubt anyone is going to fix that hole in Charlie Kirk’s neck, so probably if people want to help out, they should send cases of tissues to Nick Fuentes, who is so sad because violence is so bad and scary and no behavior should ever have consequences.

No one should shoot anyone and blah blah blah. But hey, cry me a river. No, wait, don’t cry me a river. Nick Fuentes’ tears are already causing global flooding, threatening the crops and eroding our beaches.

I kid, I kid.

But frankly, it really doesn’t seem to me that many people are actually taking seriously the realities we are facing in this country, and the troubles that are coming down the pipe. America has been killing people all over the world for many decades, while creating an utterly poisonous culture at home, and obviously, the only way this could ever end was in blood and fire.

Personally, I don’t care Charlie Kirk got shot.

He’s an evil person, he devoted his life to supporting evil all over the world, and things come back around.

If violence bothers you, and you have an emotional breakdown over a video of some global terrorist supporter getting shot, you should probably go slink away somewhere and keep your head down. Cover your head with a blanky.

There are going to be shootings, there is going to be shit a lot worse than that. America put itself in a position where there was no possible outcome other than violence.

I’m against it! Okay? Yes, I think Charlie Kirk getting shot is sort of hilarious, but I don’t support it and am really against all sorts of violence. But seriously. Grow the fuck up.

What did you think was going to happen?

This isn’t an isolated event, it is the beginning of a new era where feelings of hopelessness and helplessness are maxed out, where all kinds of different people decide that there is no recourse other than violence.

Please note this just happened a couple days ago:

That “Ukraine” woman didn’t devote her life to promoting a genocide in Palestine, pushing for mass immigration into America, starting wars all over the world, or forcing African people to have gay sex. And she got a lot less outpouring of emotion than Charlie Kirk.

In terms of this particular thing: they haven’t announced Kirk is dead yet, though having your carotid opened up like that is something you really have to fix quickly. I would think he’s probably dead. But maybe there was medical staff close by. Who knows. Who cares. I don’t care.

I will say that I am worried that if Charlie doesn’t pull through, Sharia Law will conquer America.

]]> Tucker Confirms Steve Bannon’s Claim That Dozens of Trump Supporters Were Raided by the Feds https://www.anglinarchive.com/2022/09/11/tucker-confirms-steve-bannons-claim-that-dozens-of-trump-supporters-were-raided-by-the-feds/ Sun, 11 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0000

On Thursday, Steve Bannon went on the Charlie Kirk podcast and said that at least 35 raids were conducted against Trump supporters last week.

The interview came after Bannon was released from custody in New York, having turned himself in for charges related to embezzling funds from a wall-building charity. Bannon most likely did embezzle funds, and would have reason to lie. Furthermore, after the shitbag drunk Gavin McInnes faked his arrest, you have to be skeptical of anything coming from this crowd.

However, on Friday, Tucker Carlson had on Republican lawyer Harmeet Dhillon, who is a much more serious person than Steve Bannon, and she confirmed that she had knowledge of these raids.

She said that three of her clients were raided or hit with subpoenas, and she has information that there were fifty (50) of these.

This was Friday and today is Sunday, and we haven’t heard anything about who these people are. But basically, we’re spiraling into a situation where everyone is getting raided for supporting Donald Trump.

I am not going to say that is eminent. But it might be? I would not be surprised, which is the primary reason of several reasons that Gavin McInnes’ cutesy little hoax was so repulsive and unforgivable. Everyone is expecting these raids, and he thought it was a good idea to mock that concern of the people, and to mock all of the other political prisoners, in order to try to gain media attention.

He didn’t get much media attention, but the media will use his madcap prank in the future. When people start disappearing, they are going to say that faking arrests is just something that right-wingers do, and use him as evidence.

Let me just say again: I’m not trying to sound histrionic. I don’t know when or who the feds are going to raid next. But they raided Trump, they raided a Republican congressman, then Biden declared himself a dictator, and they’re now raiding unnamed Trump supporters. So, we don’t know what happens next.

There’s an argument to make that if they’re just raiding rich Trump supporters that the chilling effect they are trying to produce is aimed at donors and other infrastructure of the Trump team, and not yet aimed at the broader public. But we don’t know that. Even if it is currently just aimed at infrastructure, it could spin into something else quickly.

Who knows what comes next. I don’t know. These people are out of control, and as soon as they stole the election, it was obvious that there was only one way this could go.

]]>