These numbers sound insane, but they’re actually much lower than what the government was claiming a year ago, and it’s certainly a lot lower than the government’s goal, which is to turn all children into trannies.

The government has offered massive social incentives through all of these programs that make trannies untouchable, allowed to do whatever they want, and still only a small percentage take the bait.

It should give us all hope for the future. The trannies will all commit suicide anyway. They are not a threat.

ABC News:

A first-of-its-kind survey has found that 3.3% of U.S. high school students identified as transgender in 2023, with another 2.2% identified as questioning.

The first nationally representative survey from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also highlights the multiple health disparities faced by transgender students who may experience gender dysphoria, stigma, discrimination, social marginalization or violence because they do not conform to social expectations of gender, the CDC reports.

These stressors increase the likelihood transgender youth and those who are questioning may experience mental health challenges, leading to disparities in health and well-being, according to the health agency.

Here are some of the findings:More than a quarter (26%) of transgender and questioning students attempted suicide in the past year, compared to 5% of cisgender male and 11% of cisgender female students. The CDC urged schools to “create safer and more supportive environments for transgender and questioning students” to address these disparities, including inclusive activities, mental health and other health service referrals, and implementing policies that are LGBTQ-inclusive.

About 7 in 10 questioning students (69%) and transgender students (72%) experienced persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness, which the CDC states is a marker of depressive symptoms.

The CDC estimates 40% of transgender and questioning students have experienced bullying at school. About a quarter of transgender students (25.3%) and more than a quarter of questioning students (26.4%) skipped school because they felt unsafe, compared with 8.5% of cisgender male students.

Only 40% of trannies are bullied in school?

That is disappointing.

Trans students were more likely to experience unstable housing in the last month than cisgender students. The CDC found 10.7% of trans students and 10% of questioning students said they experienced unstable housing, compared to 2.1% of cisgender males and 1.8% of cisgender females.

The CDC noted this disparity is likely caused of discrimination, such as family rejection.

You see that?

The home life is unstable because they’re trannies. They’re not trannies because the home life is unstable.

Why would you not assume the reverse?

How about a survey on how many teachers are trannies?

About damn time we let nature take its course.

In 2014, Mother  Nature finally awakened from its slumber and brought forth the Ebola outbreak in Africa. There can be little doubt that this was a response to the Black race’s aggressive destruction of its environment.

Nature was fed up with the White man’s unwillingness to cull to exploding Black population, and endeavored to take care of business without our help.

This mystical force for righteousness touched the souls of those with the sensitivity to understand it, and it was revealed to us as “Ebola-Chan.”

But tragically, under the direction of evil African warlord Barrack Obama, the United States intervened and helped to fight back against Ebola-Chan.

The new Center for Disease Control, under Trump, won’t make the same mistake again.

Washington Post:

Four years after the United States pledged to help the world fight infectious-disease epidemics such as Ebola, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is dramatically downsizing its epidemic prevention activities in 39 out of 49 countries because money is running out, U.S. government officials said.

The CDC programs, part of a global health security initiative, train front-line workers in outbreak detection and work to strengthen laboratory and emergency response systems in countries where disease risks are greatest. The goal is to stop future outbreaks at their source.

Why would we want to stop future outbreaks?

Blacks are not an endangered species – quite the opposite. Blacks are an invasive species ravaging the natural landscape of Africa, stripping it of its biodiversity.

Most of the funding comes from a one-time, five-year emergency package that Congress approved to respond to the 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa. About $600 million was awarded to the CDC to help countries prevent infectious-disease threats from becoming epidemics. That money is slated to run out by September 2019. Despite statements from President Trump and senior administration officials affirming the importance of controlling outbreaks, officials and global infectious-disease experts are not anticipating that the administration will budget additional resources.

Two weeks ago, the CDC began notifying staffers and officials abroad about its plan to downsize these activities, because officials assume there will be “no new resources,” said a senior government official speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss budget matters.

The only possible argument to be made for preventing outbreaks of these diseases in third-world countries is that they might spread to us unless we contain them ourselves.

That’s a good point.

But the obvious solution, then, is to simply quarantine the third-world. They can’t infect us if they stay in their shitholes, right? And this is exactly what’s being done by the Trump administration: close the borders, and let the brown people die of horrible diseases.

We’ll even have a nice wall to prevent the “infected” from crossing over.

It’s a perfect plan, which the Daily Stormer endorses whole-heartedly.

Banning the word is nice, but I’d much rather they ban trannies themselves tbh.

The purpose of the Center for Disease Control is to prevent and control outbreaks of dangerous diseases, such as cholera and AIDS. So it only makes sense that they would implement measures to control the most virulent disease of them all: liberalism.

Banning words such as “diversity,” “transgender” or “vulnerable” is a good preventive measure, considering that words shape the way we think, but I definitely think they should take a more active approach

One small step would be to mandate the use of the word “tranny” instead of transgender, for example.

A more robust approach would be to simply exterminate trannies and be done with the whole thing.

Oh, well, one small step at a time, I suppose.

CNN:

Officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the very agency tasked with saving and protecting the lives of the most vulnerable, are now under order by the Trump administration to stop using words including “vulnerable” in 2018 budget documents, according to The Washington Post.

In a 90-minute briefing on Thursday, policy analysts at the nation’s leading public health institute were presented with the menu of seven banned words, an analyst told the paper. On the list: “diversity,” “fetus,” “transgender,” “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “science-based” and “evidence-based.”

Taste the liberal butt-hurt.

“Vulnerable” is a good one to take out. As in, “homosexuals are vulnerable to HIV infection.” We need to replace that with “homos are disease vectors, and thus a public safety risk.”

Obviously, “diversity” should definitely be banned from government use. I suggest “brown-ness” or “barbarism” as suitable alternatives.

Alternative word choices reportedly were presented in some cases. For instance, in lieu of “evidence-based” or “science-based,” an analyst might say, “CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes,” the source said. But those working on the Zika virus’s effect on developing fetuses may be at a loss for appropriate — or acceptable — words.

I have no idea what “evidence-based” and “science-based” are all about, in terms of politics. But it’s probably a good way to troll the shit-lib scientists who are using pseudo-scientific methods to justify giving more money to brown people.

The reaction in the room was “incredulous,” the longtime CDC analyst told the Post. “It was very much, ‘Are you serious? Are you kidding?'”

We’re serious – but also trolling you.

As news of the word ban spreads at the CDC, the analyst expects growing backlash.

“Our subject matter experts will not lay down quietly,” the unnamed source said. “This hasn’t trickled down to them yet.”

Good! The more backlash, the better!

These people failed for decades to get the homo-plague under control, so they can’t be very competent. The CDC obviously needs new blood and innovative ideas – which only the American nationalist movement can provide.

For example, declaring third-world people “disease transmission vectors” and containing them in quarantine zones, preferably in the middle of the ocean. That would definitely bring down the infection rates – not to mention, our healthcare fees.

Here’s another freebie: decontaminate gay bathhouses, known STD breeding grounds, with specialized equipment (flamethrowers).

There’s no shortage of lateral-thinking that could be applied to these problems. We just need the right people in place.