Archbishop Charles Scicluna of Malta

Well, I actually agree with this, but not for the reasons the Vatican is promoting it.

The Vatican is promoting it just because they’re attacking everything in the Church.

But yeah, the mandatory celibacy thing is ridiculous. A lot of priests are going to choose to be celibate regardless, but there is no reason they should be forced. It’s not the Middle Ages, and we have the ability to prevent the problem of priests leaving estates to their children.

Reuters:

The Roman Catholic Church should “seriously think” about allowing priests to marry, a senior Vatican official and advisor to Pope Francis said in an interview published on Sunday.

“This is probably the first time I’m saying it publicly and it will sound heretical to some people,” Archbishop Charles Scicluna of Malta, who is also adjunct secretary in the Vatican’s doctrinal office, told the Times of Malta.

Pope Francis in 2019 ruled out any chance that he would change the Roman Catholic rule requiring priests to be celibate. But it is not a formal doctrine of the Church and so it could be changed by a future pope.

In an interview with a Latin American news outlet in 2023, Francis spoke about the celibacy rule again, saying that “it is not eternal, like priestly ordination”, but a “discipline” that could be revised.

Scicluna, perhaps best known for his investigations of sexual abuse crimes, noted that priests were allowed to marry in the first millennium of the Church’s history and that marriage is allowed today in the Eastern rite of the Catholic Church.

“If it were up to me, I would revise the requirement that priests have to be celibate,” he said. “Experience has shown me that this is something we need to seriously think about.”

Scicluna, 64, said the Church had “lost many great priests because they chose marriage”.

I have a tendency to simply disagree with the Vatican about everything on principle, but they have lost many great priests due to this archaic and pointless rule, which is explicitly condemned by Saint Paul.

See: Alabama Priest Who Married 18-Year-Old Girl Now Officially Removed from Priesthood

Say what you want about the Russian Orthodox Church, but I’ve never seen a ROCOR priest hang a “pride” flag in the church, wear a rainbow stole, or bless a same-sex couple. pic.twitter.com/MGHOH8vBBp

— Joseph Sciambra (@JosephSciambra) January 2, 2024

Alex Crow

Previously: Apparently It’s Illegal “Grooming” to Flirt with a Girl Before She Turns 18…? 

This whole idea of “grooming” being a bad word is new and bizarre.

It was used to explain the recruitment of white girls into Pakistani prostitution and drug gangs in the UK. That was not the correct word there. They used it to make the girls sound like victims. If different language would have been used, people would have been calling for the girls to be prosecuted for crimes.

The word had been used in all sorts of neutral contexts: “he is grooming a successor.”

“Grooming for marriage” is a phrase that has been used historically with no negative connotation.

New York Post:

The disgraced Alabama priest who ran off to Italy with an 18-year-old woman over the summer is now married to the teenager — as an archbishop revealed Wednesday that the Vatican will likely move to officially oust him from the priesthood.

Alex Crow, a 30-year-old Catholic priest, married the young woman who was a 2023 high school graduate, according to a marriage certificate filed in Mobile County Monday.

She only turned 18 back in June, the document states.

Crow and the woman went to Europe over the summer before returning back to the US earlier this month, AL.com reported.

Crow, already suspended, has likely given his last sermon, Archbishop Thomas J. Rodi signaled this week.

“The recent news of Crow’s civil marriage only confirms the Archbishop’s judgment. Archbishop Rodi anticipates that the Vatican will eventually laicize Alex Crow,” read a statement from the Archdiocese of Mobile.

Rodi, in a previous statement, lambasted the spiritual leader and said his actions were “totally unbecoming of a priest.”

It’s true that a priest is not supposed to get married. I don’t really agree with this policy, but that’s the policy.

Otherwise, this guy didn’t do anything wrong, and the story is actually very wholesome.

Why should men have to marry used-up old hookers? Who is that good for?

See: Pope Invites 120 Trannies to Lunch at the Vatican

Previously: Apparently It’s Illegal “Grooming” to Flirt with a Girl Before She Turns 18…? (Seriously, read this if you missed it)

This is an update on the confusing story about how it is apparently illegal to flirt with girls under 18 and then date them after they turn 18.

We still do not understand what law is involved here, but it is no doubt somehow related to “sex trafficking,” which is a catch all term that includes all forms of prostitution as well as any other type of relationship between men and women that the ideological American state does not approve of.

Andrew Anglin already wrote a long thing about this, and there isn’t really much to add in terms of commentary until something happens. But this is the situation as it sits.

The Guardian:

A Roman Catholic priest in Alabama who fled to Europe with a recent high school graduate whom he met through his work has drawn scrutiny from law enforcement and been told to stop presenting himself in public as a cleric.

Alex Crow, an expert in the theological study of demons and exorcism, is suspected of having “groomed [multiple] young girls” before going to Italy with an 18-year-old, according to an interview that local sheriff Paul Burch recently gave to Fox Nation’s Nancy Grace. The teen’s family has been trying to convince her to return home.

Burch has publicly released two letters written by Crow, 30, to support that assertion. In one of the letters to the teen, Crow described how he loved her and claimed that they were married. The Pillar, a Catholic news outlet, reported that the letter was for Valentine’s Day, when the girl was 17 and had not yet graduated from the parochial school where Crow had sat in on classes and met with students in the context of the sacrament known as confession.

The girl’s family members have said they are “extremely fearful” for her safety, according to an attorney who spoke to the local television station WKRG. Another local news outlet, al.com, reported that the girl’s family had gone to Italy to meet with her – but Crow wouldn’t allow her to be alone with her relatives. Federal officials in the US have been in talks with Italian authorities to help police investigators in Mobile, Alabama, interview the girl.

It’s unclear whether Crow could face charges in connection with the girl. Her family has acknowledged she went to Europe of her own free will, and the purpose of the trip with Crow hasn’t been confirmed, according to authorities.

While the age of sexual consent in Alabama is 16, there is a state law which prohibits a school employee from having sexual contact with a student younger than 18. There are also federal laws which prohibit using certain methods of communication to speak explicitly with someone who is younger than 18.

Additionally, Burch told Grace on her Crime Stories podcast that investigators had found another “young girl that [Crow] was previously acting inappropriately with, and he was ordered to stay away from her, and … we’re trying to get to come on board but she’s not exactly cooperating at the moment”.

The second teen was reportedly seen leaving Crow’s hotel room at about 1.30am during a school trip. Burch suggested to Grace that his deputies were examining whether Crow may have broken the law which prohibits sexual contact between school employees and students.

As of Friday, Crow remained under orders to return to Mobile and not work as a cleric, having been told by his archdiocese that he “abandoned his assignment”. The archdiocese also told him his behavior is “totally unbecoming of a priest”. Priests take a vow of celibacy, and Catholic officials have implemented guidelines which are meant to establish boundaries between clergymen and vulnerable adults amid the worldwide church’s decades-old clerical molestation.

He could face further archdiocesan consequences, but his case illustrates how it won’t be easy.

For that to process to even begin, Mobile’s archbishop, Thomas Rodi, would have to assemble a clerical panel to evaluate the allegations against Crow and weigh whether he deserves forceful removal from the priesthood. The process – governed by church law – could not start until the beginning of next year, according to WKRG’s reporting.

Rodi’s archdiocese said in a statement that it intends to seek Crow’s permanent removal from the clergy, which is an extremely rare measure. Rodi himself was a high-ranking administrator in the archdiocese of New Orleans in 2000 when the organization carbon-copied him on a letter welcoming back a priest to normal duties after having gone on a sabbatical because of his admitting to sexually molesting or harassing multiple children whom he met through work.

That priest, Lawrence Hecker, was never forcibly removed from the clergy, retired quietly in 2002 and has yet to be criminally prosecuted.

Anglin wrote in his piece – which is long, and you should go read it – that there are issues with a priest using his position of authority in the Church to seduce hot girls.

However, whatever moral issues exist there pale in comparison to the moral travesty that is the Western attempt to outlaw normal human sexuality.

Demographics is destiny

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 22, 2023

(note to Anglin: source article dated April 26, 2023. Removed 10 paragraphs. If a woman is not having sex because she’s not getting the relationship she wants in return, that sounds pretty much like being an incel in the sense that incels are not having sex because they don’t want to pay for it. But overall, this article touches on some important points about how men and women are not getting what they want.)

Women, apparently, are having less sex.

What the reader would expect for me to do here is say “this sounds good, but actually it’s bad, because….”

I am very aware that at least since the 2020 election hoax, I’ve become “Dr. Poison Fruit.”

In actual fact, “The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” is a legal metaphor that means that any evidence obtained illegally is tainted and inadmissible. That is to say, if a police officer pulls over a car for speeding and opens the trunk and finds 100 kilos of cocaine, but the lawyer of the criminal is able to prove that he was not actually speeding when he was pulled over, and the original traffic stop was therefore illegal, then the cocaine cannot be used as evidence in court.

However, I have used this metaphor as a reference to another metaphor which I have forgotten the name of, and which may no longer be active in English, wherein every seemingly good phenomenon which happens in the Western world is meaningless because it is tainted by the denial of God. I may also make some reference to C.S. Lewis’ view of pride as the ultimate sin (which I actually find to be an uncharacteristically non-useful Lewisism).

Please see: Victoria’s Secret Embraces Ugliness, Signaling That the Porno Age is Already Totally Over

However, I am only making this assertion in terms of the positive actions of the Beast 666 – not to lack of actions by the Beast, and certainly not to individuals making positive changes for negative reasons.

This, typically, would be the point at which I have found myself buried under something too convoluted to be useful, and would delete all preceding text, given that the level of seriousness of the tone and its implications are lost on me, the writer, and I have therefore lost all control of the communications process. Instead of doing this, however, I will not do this, out a a peculiar spite for the reader, which only made itself manifest mere minutes ago, and will surely pass before I understand where I am going with this.

I will instead make an outrageous claim: a reduction in premarital sex by women is probably good regardless of why, but it is also possible that is not true.

And then, eventually, I’m going to claim that this is a conspiracy designed to explain the birthrate collapse which resulted from the vax.

The Guardian:

Caitlin didn’t set out to become celibate – at least not in the beginning. Three years ago, she was coming out of an abusive relationship and wasn’t ready to meet someone else. Then Covid happened, and the lockdowns made it impossible anyway. “I thought during that time I needed space to heal and reflect on what I’d been through,” she says. Towards the end of 2020, the 23-year-old artist started therapy. “I realised if I was going to be sexually active, I needed someone who would understand my past, and where I was coming from. I don’t want to be with someone unless I know it’s committed, and I’m not in a rush to find that.”

And there it is: the thing.

It is like when the coronavirus masking phenomenon led the Guardian to promote the niqab.

The evil of society has resulted in withdrawing from society in a positive way.

She had been on dating apps, but found it hard to meet men who wanted a relationship, rather than just sex. “I found they would stop talking to me if I made it known I wasn’t going to hook up with them on the first date. I found a lot of men would put on a bit of an act to appear as if they wanted a relationship, then as soon as you took sex off the table while getting to know them, they disappeared. It’s tricky when a lot of dating is around hook-up culture, which I’m not interested in.”

Maybe, however, the woman is simply aging and becoming and and more bitter, as is the case with women.

Caitlin’s celibacy, three years in now, became intentional. She hasn’t missed sex itself, she says, and certainly not casual sex, although sometimes, “seeing people in relationships and having healthy sex lives, can make me go: ‘Why don’t I have that?’” But it has had unintentional benefits. “It’s taught me more about what I enjoy in sex, which I wasn’t expecting. I thought it was going to put me at a disadvantage, but I feel a lot more confident in my own sexuality.” While sex with someone else is out, masturbation is still in, and she says her libido has increased. “I think because exploring different things without dealing with another person has allowed me to find what I enjoy.” It has also made her more relaxed about finding a relationship (or not). “I’ve got other things to focus on. It’s if someone fits into my life rather than me needing to make room for them.”

So it is entirely negative, maladaptive behavior, which lines up with Christian thought only incidentally, in a way that almost makes a mockery of sexual morality.

On TikTok, voluntary or intentional celibacy has become a trend – the #celibacy hashtag has had more than 195m views – with those who practise it claiming it has improved their focus, mental health and energy. In January, it was reported that there was a 90% increase in Google searches for celibacy that month.

We already knew this.

It says it in the Bible.

“This coincides with a long-term trend among people today, in general, having less sex with fewer partners,” says Dr Justin Lehmiller, a Kinsey Institute research fellow and host of the Sex and Psychology podcast. “Humans are increasingly less sexually active, with some forgoing sex altogether.” Study after study of sexual behaviour, in different countries, show this. The last National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal) in Britain found that 16% of men and 22% of women aged 16 to 74 were sexually inactive, and for most of them, it wasn’t a problem. While the authors noted the documented wellbeing benefits of a satisfying sex life, of those who had previously had sexual experience, the majority were not dissatisfied with their situation (around a third of men, and a quarter of women reported they were dissatisfied, although age had an effect, with younger people more dissatisfied than older people). The Natsal data is more than 10 years old, though, and its authors noted in a 2019 paper on the sexually inactive how little is known about them.

We know a lot about sexually inactive men. I can tell you this. It’s simply that this data is considered unimportant by a feminist society that assumes a man not having sex is dangerous or evil, and apparently it is only now that we are thinking about the existence of women who are “post-slut” sex-free.

And, I can pretty well tell you, it will only be the Guardian discussing this (at least in English).

The National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior in the US found that between 2009 and 2018 there was a rise in adolescents reporting no sexual activity (partnered and alone), from 28.8% to 44.2% of young men and from 49.5% to 74% of young women. In one interview, the study’s authors raised several possible contributing factors, including gaming and social media taking time and precedence, more awareness of asexuality as an identity, a decline in alcohol use, an increase in “rough sex” practices such as choking that may be frightening or off-putting to many, and lower incomes.

lol @ pornography as instructional material leading to unsatisfied teen whores.

Who could have imagined??

Voluntary celibacy in the US, where Lehmiller is based, seems to have more links to religion than it does in the UK. Furthermore, he says, “in this #MeToo and post-Roe era [with the rollback of reproductive rights] we find ourselves in, the perceived risks associated with sex are higher, particularly for women. And, when you factor in the orgasm gap and the fact that women’s pleasure still isn’t on a par with men’s, some women are asking themselves whether sex is even worth it. If you see it as a high-risk, low-reward kind of thing, you might decide you’re better off without it.”

Haha.

The “ask the kike” section.

It’s still so strange that the Guardian manages to print articles where they give arguments that are not Jewish. If this was in the NYT/WaPo, the entire article would be Roe v. Wade and the “orgasm gap.”

He suggests that celibacy, for some, may be part of “the growing trend towards delayed adulthood. Individuals might see sex and relationships as distractions, or as not having much point until they’ve found stability in other life circumstances.” The pressures of studying, establishing a career or saving for a home may take priority. While voluntary celibacy seems less popular among non-religious heterosexual men, some have talked online about intentional celibacy providing more focus for their careers, with sex being a distraction.

But he will never tell you that video games are more fun than sex.

For those who are dating, apps have changed the way many people find partners, but as Lehmiller points out, online dating is an arena “where there’s a lot of toxic behaviour, brutal rejection and feelings of intense competition for mates. It can make sex and relationships feel like a high-stress, high-stakes thing. Some people may find that taking a pause from that is good for their mental health.”

Online dating is the World Trade Organization for the sexual marketplace.

I should delete everything else I’ve written here and rewrite everything around that sentence.

While celibacy is for many a positive personal choice, it can also be viewed as the result of, or a reaction against, a messed-up sexual culture, just as some of the second wave feminists chose political lesbianism decades ago. Last year, the “femcel”, or “female involuntary celibate”, went mainstream. “They feel the same sense of ‘humiliation and exclusion’ that ‘incels’ do,” as a piece in the Atlantic put it, “but they react to those feelings differently.”

It’s almost like someone lied to them.

Unlike the notorious misogynistic incels who blame women for not wanting to have sex with them, femcels posting in online groups tend to blame their celibacy on the soul-destroying sexual landscape and a society that, for all its hollow talk of “body positivity”, is still obsessed with looks and beauty conventions.

Shut up.

If you’re not explicitly attempting to have children, then you are going to separate sex from physical attractiveness how?

This is like a situation of a person becoming obese by eating ten thousand calories of Romaine Lettuce every day.

(Another notably good sentence.)

Louise Perry, author of The Case Against the Sexual Revolution, says that many young heterosexual women “now feel as if they have to run the gauntlet of hook-up culture if they want to have any kind of sexual relationship. I think a lot of them, quite fairly, would rather not have any sexual relationship at all.” The influence and availability of pornography, she adds, “has had a really destructive effect on sexual culture.” She says surveys show that “most women don’t get that much out of casual sex. The problem is, because our sexual culture is so oriented towards a more masculine style of sexuality, a lot of young women in particular don’t feel as if they are able to demand commitment from their partners. Increasing numbers are opting out of the sexual culture altogether.”

I don’t even know what you’re supposed to say to that.

Whose idea was it that women would get something out of casual sex? What could they get, other than their power trip? What value does the power trip have the next day? And what have they paid for it, emotionally, psychologically, and spiritually?

Who spread this idea into society in the first place?

Was it the Jews again?

It’s naive, she says, to think you can simply choose to avoid pornography and casual sex if you’re sexually active, “because the nature of sex in general, and social relationships, is that they’re networked – you have sex with people who have sex with other people, who watch porn. Even if you choose not to do that, other people do it, and it changes the culture. I think that, particularly in young people, who are super-sensitive to what other people think about them, the default setting now is to have pornified, casual sex.” For some people, opting out might feel like their only option.

You cannot have non pornified sex, no. That is a good point, if obvious.

The same people will tell you to do “foreplay” and then have sex for thirteen (13) minutes in order to cause a “female orgasm”(???)

We should maybe remember we are animals, physically, and just start showing kids the Discovery Channel.

This “sex as nearly hour-long dramatic performance involving multiple ideological disciplines” is pathological behavior which is only possible now.

That’s what the article should have been about, frankly. Pornography oriented performative sex, even if it doesn’t include BDSM materials, is like if Mary Poppins was your real nanny.

Seriously, watch the video:

Then think about all the different implications of the sentence “Pornography oriented performative sex … is like if Mary Poppins was your real nanny.” They all apply.

Also: I’m going Napcel.

The Daily Mail ran a British Women And Relationships poll and found funny things about women and sex.

Daily Mail:

There’s a drawer in Vicky Doyle’s bedroom where she keeps her silk lingerie. The last time she pulled it open — a year ago, to put a new set away — she stared at its contents and burst into tears.

‘I thought back to when each item was bought, for birthdays, wedding anniversaries and this latest set, which my husband left on our bed as a romantic gesture, and I felt so sad,’ says Vicky. ‘I sat there holding a pair of lace-trimmed knickers, crying and wishing I was still the person I was the last time I wore them.’

Vicky says her old self feels like a stranger: someone who would confidently slip into sexy undies as part of an uncomplicated prelude to making love several times a week.

Today, the 38-year-old executive assistant finds the very idea of sex distressing. ‘I only occasionally agree to it, with the lights out.

She’s 38 years old and an executive assistant — two problems right there. Old career woman having old career woman problems.

‘He goes along with this because he’s just glad we’re having sex. But he says my hang-ups have taken the joy out of it.’

On the face of it, little should stand in the way of this couple enjoying a fulfilling sex life. Their friends, Vicky is certain, would be shocked by their lack of intimacy.

‘I haven’t confided in anyone at all, and I doubt Adam has either,’ she says. ‘It’s not the kind of thing you shout about.’

The problem? Since giving birth to her son Bobby two years ago, Vicky feels deeply unhappy with how her body has changed — particularly her stomach, which bears a Caesarean scar. ‘I look in the mirror and see a flabby stomach,’ she says. ‘The last thing I feel like is having sex. I’m amazed my husband can get aroused.

No. The problem is that she’s ancient. She gave birth to her son when she was 36. What was she doing before that?

She spent like 20 years doing what exactly?

Grandmother-aged women have kids and wonder why their bodies are not what they used to be and our society thinks that that is somehow empowering them because hey, after all, they were able to spend their fertile years working and proving to the world that they can do men’s stuff too!

‘He says I’m beautiful but it makes me feel worse. I don’t believe him.

‘Before Bobby was born, we used to have sex several times a week, sometimes more than once a night.

‘But now the weeks turn into months. When we try, I find it so difficult to relax and enjoy it.’

Yeah, I don’t blame you, Vicky. I don’t believe him either.

Vicky Doyle

This Vicky woman looks like a grandmother and she knows it.

Vicky is far from alone. The crushing effect of poor body image on women’s sex drive is among the startling findings of an in-depth sex survey conducted for the Mail — the most revealing of its type in years.

Our poll on British Women And Relationships asked more than 1,000 women aged over 25 about their affairs, their sexual appetite and what stops them having sex.

The data was weighted by age and region, using data from the Office for National Statistics.

…of course it’s only old women.

The answers are a fascinating window into what’s happening in the nation’s bedrooms — or not, because more than a quarter of women (27 per cent) said they no longer have sex.

That’s a startling proportion in an age when sex aids are casually offered for sale alongside supermarket groceries, especially considering that 72 per cent of those we spoke to were in a relationship.

Yet behavioural psychologist and relationship expert Jo Hemmings says she isn’t surprised.

‘Modern life is frenetic — young women are chasing careers, often raising families too; middle age can see you stretched further with elderly relatives to care for.

Old women may not be having much sex or many kids, but at least when they were in their prime, they got to grab some of men’s power and experience the independence and freedom of receiving orders from their bosses instead of receiving orders from their husbands.

That must count for something.

‘When you finally steal some time for yourself, slumping on the sofa in front of a box set can seem easier than sex. After all, we have endless streamed entertainment at our fingertips these days.

‘I see female clients of all generations who say they struggle to find interest or time any more.’

Indeed, 55 per cent of women polled reported simple exhaustion has prevented them from having sex.

Yes. All generations.

Women of ALL AGES have this problem.

Especially those in college, who are very exhausted from studying so much.

Vicky says that picture sounds familiar. ‘On top of everything else, I’m often too exhausted for sex.’

If you’re nodding in agreement, beware. Couples psychotherapist Hilda Burke warns always feeling too tired, or that you can’t be bothered, could actually mask a deeper problem with intimacy.

‘Tiredness is an often-used but flimsy reason for not wanting sex,’ she says. ‘The real reason could turn out to be much deeper dissatisfaction within the relationship, or one’s own looks.’

Hilda’s observation resonates with perhaps the poll’s most startling finding: that nearly a third of women surveyed (30 per cent) put their flagging sex lives down to negative body image.

That should come as no surprise, considering that women over 25, which is the demographic the poll looked at, are egregiously gross.

They know they are gross, they know that their “partners” know that they are gross, and they are grossed out by their partner’s gross desire to have gross old-people sex with them instead of looking for younger women.

In other words, British women of all ages are so worried about how they look that it’s stopping them from enjoying sex with the partners they told our interviewers they dearly love.

‘This is a symptom of our times,’ says clinical psychologist Lauren Callaghan, one of the country’s leading experts in body dysmorphia. ‘We might think poor body image is mainly a problem for teenage girls, but it can eat away at women of any age.

Oh, yes. Right. Teenage girls are known to have very, very, very, little sex.

Yes. Very true.

Although with the cellphones giving them all the attention they need…

Maybe they don’t need sex anymore?

Maybe sex is officially obsolete, and white people can finally just stop existing once and for all?

The price? Your blood.

Turns out teens who don’t have a girlfriend are actually better off than their romanced counterparts.

Study Finds:

In contrast to every movie or television show you’ve ever seen about teenagers in high school, a new study has found that teens who don’t date are happier, less depressed, and more adept at dealing with a variety of social situations.

It’s generally believed that dating is a perfectly healthy part of being a teenager. Forming a romantic connection for the first time can help teens’ grow their self-esteem, mature on an emotional level, and develop important social skills for later on in life. While all of that still holds true, researchers from the University of Georgia say that not dating can be just as, if not more, beneficial for teens.

The research team discovered that teens who had not dated during middle or high school displayed good social skills, low levels of depression, and generally fared equal to or better than their classmates who were dating.

Considering the public and private suffering of the average married man, who could have predicted that exposing young men to the manipulation games of women with significantly better bodies and looks than the average wife wouldn’t be optimal?

This is a shocking development.

“The majority of teens have had some type of romantic experience by 15 to 17 years of age, or middle adolescence,” explains doctoral student and the study’s lead author Brooke Douglas in a release. “This high frequency has led some researchers to suggest that dating during teenage years is a normative behavior. That is, adolescents who have a romantic relationship are therefore considered ‘on time’ in their psychological development.”

“Does this mean that teens that don’t date are maladjusted in some way? That they are social misfits? Few studies had examined the characteristics of youth who do not date during the teenage years, and we decided we wanted to learn more,” Douglas continues.

…

Surprisingly, the study’s authors discovered that non-dating students had either similar, or better, interpersonal skills than their dating classmates. Furthermore, while self-reported positive relationship scores did not differ between either groups, teachers rated the non-dating students significantly higher than their romance-seeking classmates in terms of social and leadership skills.

Regarding depression, teachers also rated non-dating students as less depressed. Additionally, far fewer abstinent students reported feeling depressed or hopeless regularly than students who were known to date.

Dating during the teenage years is more likely to turn men into women’s puppets because the good judgment of teens is clouded by the novelty of goo holes. They just haven’t strengthened their masculine essence enough to resist the influence of goo.

They’re new to men’s overdrive sex drive mode and haven’t yet mastered the art of controlling it and harnessing its power, so they’re prime targets to get used and abused by girls looking for some fun practice.

“In summary, we found that non-dating students are doing well and are simply following a different and healthy developmental trajectory than their dating peers,” says study co-author professor Pamela Orpinas.

Douglas and her team believe that schools should do more to remind students that choosing not to date is just as healthy and normal as dating.

“As public health professionals, we can do a better job of affirming that adolescents do have the individual freedom to choose whether they want to date or not, and that either option is acceptable and healthy,” Douglas concludes.

There is nothing wrong with men who don’t date. There’s nothing unnatural about it.

In fact, not dating is more natural than dating.

The kind of heterosexual interactions common in our society nowadays are far from natural and quite different from what we had throughout most of history. Sterility in the form of effective contraception turned things upside down, for starters. Men spending ridiculous amounts of time in the company of women in order to be “granted” access to their vaginas is a new thing.

Imagine what you could do with all of that time and energy instead.

Having “relationships” with women without producing offspring is a new thing. Men used to put babies inside women and then go back to building, conquering, inventing, and exploring, while checking in from time to time to see if the family was still alive and to appreciate his beautiful kids.

This thing we have now where women can choose what to do is destroying the world.

It’s wasting the time of men — time that could be better spent inventing and discovering stuff — without giving them anything to show for it other than goo. Yet men keep going at it like gardeners planting seeds in sand.

Don’t waste your seeds.

Not having a girlfriend doesn’t mean not having sex, it just means not entertaining women with a “relationship” in order to get it. That said, it wouldn’t be surprising if a new study came out in the near future saying that men choosing not to have sex are better off.

“Incel” may soon become “Into Celibacy.”

Hercules makes his choice between the challenging paths of Virtue, or the momentary distractions of Vice.

What have Isaac Newton, Nicolai Tesla, George Handel and Adolf Hitler all got in common? They all suppressed their sexual urges and directed their life-creating energy towards achieving their goals.

Common sense tells you that if a force is so powerful that it can create a new life, keeping it within you is going to have positive creative effects and losing it is going to drain them from you.

Thus it is that we should each consider now the power of continence, as we stand in the midst of our people’s greatest struggle.

Continence in Aryan Religion and History

Our ancestors knew of the power of continence millennia ago, and it must have formed an essential part of the prototypical Aryan belief system that later organized religions like Hinduism and Christianity evolved from, as well as our less well documented Pagan faiths, as it is common amongst all of them.

In Hinduism, the male celibate is called ‘Brahmacharya,’ and their teachings explain how the fluid of creation is sublimated into the ‘Ojas Shakti’ creative power, giving the ascetic spiritual insights and enhanced understanding, as well as general improvements to his life experience. The Brahmacharya stage lasted from before puberty until a man was about 25, teaching him to resist temptation while he was at the most lustful stage of his life, as well as giving him the inspirational stamina to resist once again, after he had become a father. Some took the vow for life, much like certain orders of priests and nuns still do today In Christianity. This does not merely have its origins in Church traditions, but actually has it’s roots in the Christian scriptures themselves.

Throughout the Bible, there are references to ‘eunuchs’ and this term was not just used for gelded men, but for those who had taken the vow of chastity as well. Isaiah ch 56 v 2 – 5 confirms that these eunuchs are not ‘dry trees’ and that they have a better standing than the other sons and daughters of God. Saint John the Beloved appears to be a later confirmation of this statement, as he was said to have been continent all his life and thus Jesus loved him more than all the others.  Matthew ch 19 v 12 talks of those who have made themselves eunuchs for God, as opposed to being made eunuchs by man, or in the womb. This is obviously not talking about testicular mutilation but about those who have taken vows of continence, like the Hindu Bramacharya.

In days of old, it was only celibate priests who got to read the scriptures, as this was required in order to be able to understand the deep wisdom contained within. Most of the references to continence were later expunged from the Bible by the Protestants, who claimed it was impossible for a man to be celibate, yet the early church fathers saw celibacy as proof of the power of Christ, as without divine intervention it would have been impossible for them to keep to their vows of continence. Saint Paul gives his blessing to life-long celibates when he says it is better not to marry (have sex) at all, but if you are not strong enough for that then it is better to marry, than to slowly roast in the flames of your own lust. If you cannot control your concupiscence then it is better to have a lawful release for it, than not. Although some of the Apostles were married, the traditional Church teaching is that they were continually continent after receiving the Holy Ghost, although in Hindu teaching this happens the other way around, and it is continence itself that is the catalyst for divine inspiration.

Celibacy was not just limited to certain of the priestly caste, there are plenty of instances showing that it was a foundational part of the warriors discipline in many of the Aryan tribes. The Spartans are probably the most well-known of these celibate heroes, their name is still associated with asceticism and self denial to this day. They practiced continence along with eugenics as a way of improving the virility of their racial stock and gained a fearsome reputation through doing so, just like the later nations who were to do the same.

Bishop Salvian from the fifth century AD writes that the barbarians who were besieging Rome were shocked at the licentiousness they found there. They rejected incontinence and fornication, holding them to be great crimes and were horrified at the moral decadence in Latin society. Salvian also speaks of the Goths as being treacherous yet continent, and the Saxons as being savagely cruel, but remarkable for their chastity. They punished adultery with death, and even those familiarities between the sexes that are generally deemed innocent, were strictly prohibited to unmarried persons. The Vandals are recorded as managing to retain their moral superiority not only in Spain, but even when among the Negroes of Africa. They saw the vices which had infected Greece and Rome as an abomination and forced prostitutes to marry, as well as enacting other severe laws against immorality, compelling the Romans to be honorable against their will.

King Alfred the Great, the famous British Saxon King was once so alarmed at how debilitating the sexual urge could be, that he prayed for the Lord to send him haemorrhoids to distract him from it. Today it is not uncommon for sports coaches to ban their teams from seeing their wives before a match or tournament, hoping that just short term abstinence will provide an edge over the opposing team.

Masculinity is about protecting women, not making conquests of them.

Women, Contraception and Pornography

One of the reasons why a woman could never become a priest was because she could only go for 28 days without bleeding. The male emission was also considered as bleeding since life was contained within it, but men could go for months on end without losing any of their life creating blood. This is where we get the derogatory term ‘bleeder’ from. It means the same as ‘wanker,’ and historically was always seen as an undesirable weakness in our nations, those that had yet to be polluted by outside influence that is.

Contraception has changed this dynamic entirely between men and women, and for the first time since Pagan Rome, women are now more continent than men. This was prevented from happening in the past by the chance of unwanted pregnancy, as well as by religious tales of divine execution for the spilling of seed. There were also common folk tales of masturbation causing blindness and madness, perhaps a cryptic reference to the blindness and insanity that we see all around us in our White nations, now that the majority have exchanged self sacrifice for self pleasure.

In a strange paradoxical way, the more men waste their seed, the more neutered their masculinity becomes. What makes them male is their ability to produce seed and when this seed is retained the masculine creative power flows through them. When it is wasted, the power drains from them and they become emasculated and insecure, thinking emotionally rather than logically and placing more importance in their superficial acquisitions than their character.

Men have up to ten times more testosterone than women, and the sexual urge is very hard to control because of this. When surrounded by temptation, the male brain is clouded and easily manipulated, which is well known to those who seek to manipulate us, as well as to women (many of whom deliberately use this unequal balance of hormones to achieve short term gains for themselves). Pornography plays a big part in this and it is not so much demeaning to women as it is abusing men’s natural weakness in this respect, which was designed to ensure the husband would provide for and protect his wife, rather than so that women could use it to manipulate men. All the while men and women were limited to one monogamous relationship for life, the sex drive helped to ensure they stayed together, which is the best situation for any children to be brought up in.

The Islamic custom of women covering themselves up is a tradition that they inherited from us, that shows respect for the imbalance of hormones between the sexes. It helps to ensure that men retain autonomy over their feelings and also helps to protect women from the lower types of men who have never learnt self-restraint. This custom is left over from when they were still White, like many other of the more honorable traditions that the non-whites still have today.

Saint Paul advised women to cover themselves up 600 years before Mohammed, but unlike ‘the prophet,’ he also preached abstinence from all unlawful sex, which meant all sex outside of procreation with a wife of your own race.

Lusting after strange women will lead to death, rather than new life.

Non-White Incontinence

When Christianity was in its formative stage, it’s followers provided a stark contrast to the mixed-race pagans of the time, the same as the Aryan Hindus had to the phallus worshiping Dasyus and the Old Testament Israelites had to the incestuous Canaanites. Back then, with the introduction of non-White customs into Greek and Roman society, the women had become expected to prostitute themselves at least once in their lives in the temple, and if they were not particularly attractive, they could be left waiting there for years. The ideals that the Greeks and Romans had originally shared with the later Barbarian tribes were left behind in favor of hedonism.

The Black and mixed race pagan religions have always been based around the sex act and the lower chakras, whereas Christianity and the other purely Aryan religions were based around avoiding the sex act and concentrating the power into the higher energy centers. The darker races do not have these higher energy centers, and they have always worshiped the goddess in her heightened sexual state because of this. The unadulterated White nations worshiped the masculine principle, and only honored the female one in her essential role of supporting the masculine and bearing the posterity of the race. The purely Aryan Greek and Roman ideal of masculinity did not include the oversized appendages of the brown skinned peoples, as their statues and art clearly show. Instead, they were concerned to show the sexual organs as diminished or hidden, to get the idea of self restraint across. As the White nations in the different areas absorbed more of the dark races into their blood, their culture and art changed with it, becoming more about self-pleasure and self-glorification, as the materialistic and feminine principle of the dark races became dominant.

Christianity was fundamentally opposed to this materialistic immorality and was reviving the original social order that the White nations needed to progress in the right direction again. The historical record of the barbarian tribes before they were Christianized confirms the ancient origin of this. Both fought against the deification and objectification of women and both reintroduced morality to the struggling Greeks and Romans. They stopped women from being sold as prostitutes and used as property, and ensured that they were treated well by one husband.

The same situation that occurred back then in the Middle East is happening again today, with the influx of dark blood into our nations the female has been raised up again on a pedestal and the sex act is being worshiped as an end in itself, rather than as the means to an end. People have exchanged the joy of children for life for a few minutes of the lowest pleasure, one that animals, and even insects, are capable of engaging in.

Instead of sublimating their creative sap in between fertilizations, and ensuring a positive outcome in all that they do in their lives, Aryan men have been conned into wasting all that creative spiritual potential, and most are unaware entirely that they even possess it.

Defeating ignorance, temptation and weakness.

How Continence Works

The Vedic belief is that we project our world from within and when we waste our seed it causes much internal upset, which then manifests in our external world projection. Bad things happen quickly after a relapse and good things slowly increase the longer you go without wasting any. The right decisions present themselves to you as you learn to recognize when life is trying to steer you in a particular direction and the correct action to take becomes much easier to define, once that creative power is being utilized instead of discarded.

There is no greater penance or austerity than continence. It is well known that fasting and meditating can produce altered states, but continence is more powerful than both of those and has the potential to change the individual’s state of mind and influence the outcome of interactions with the world around them. It will give insights into situations that would have been missed entirely before, as it increases intuition and focuses the intellect. It gives everything an extra edge from peaceful religious contemplation to physical feats of strength. It is the most holy of self-sacrifices and blessings are guaranteed through it, but it will only work for you if it is a conscious decision to avoid the temptation.  If you are still devoting your energies into trying ‘to get some,’ but are just being unsuccessful, life will still be as chaotic and cluttered as ever. Each time you resist it though the more you are building up your store of strength against being compromised, as well as diminishing the chances of being put in that position again. The longer you go without, the more you will realize how much easier it is to control your responses and solve your problems, the more you will see positive improvements to your life, and all the sharper will be the contrast with how you were before. You will also really notice the negative effects after your desire finally beats you, which will be while you are asleep and unable to resist the temptation, if you are serious about it.

Slowly building up to longer and longer amounts of time without release is the most common way to achieve permanent continence nowadays. Eating special foods and going without others may also help. Going for 28 days without will at least put you on the same level as women, only losing your mojo once a month. Achieving a year without is pretty much guaranteed to improve your life in ways you never would have thought possible, even with a few unconscious relapses.

In this time of plummeting white birth rates everywhere, this may seem like strange information to provide. But only a few releases are required over a lifetime to produce a large family, and once that is achieved, the creative energy can be directed to the instruction of children. This will ensure they have a rock solid foundation from which to grow from, as well as knowing that they have their father’s undivided attention. If the sex act is seen as sacred and respected, there is a far greater chance of the family staying together and of children honoring their parents and ancestors, as we see in places where this is the case.  Even if one does not wish to devote his life to the practice, continence can be used intermittently throughout ones life to gain strength and clarity; if one is not presently in a healthy relationship with a woman, he has no reason not to practice this ancient art of sexual restraint.

Continence is a tried and tested way to improve your health, your intellect and your spiritual capabilities and awareness. It is the sacrifice of self that inspired all the notable followers of divinity, bestowing gifts of clear vision and understanding to its adepts. The single-mindedness and astonishing achievements of those great men I listed at the beginning of this piece are a testament to the power of restraint, and there are many other men of honor who have followed the same path.

The power of continence has been censored from modern religion and is ridiculed in modern life, because the enemy does not want people to be inspired and free from worldly desire, with a limitless store of inner strength, because if we did, they would no longer have any hold over us at all.

***

Further information on the subject of this article can be found here.