In Germany, people protest in support of the government.

It’s nuts.

But it’s real.

The Guardian:

Thousands of people have demonstrated against a convention of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) as political parties launched their campaigns for the country’s election next month.

A heavy police presence was in place in Riesa – in the eastern state of Saxony, an AfD stronghold – and officers cleared some protesters from the streets. However, the two-day convention started a little more than two hours late as many delegates’ trips to the venue were slowed by blockades.

AfD formally nominated co-leader Alice Weidel as its candidate for chancellor by acclamation. Weidel, who was among those held up, thanked delegates for “defying the left-wing mob and getting here”.

Polls show AfD in second place, with about 20% support, in the run-up to the 23 February elections. However, Weidel, who this week held a live chat on X with the tech billionaire Elon Musk, has no realistic chance of becoming Germany’s leader as other parties refuse to work with AfD.

The conservative opposition Union bloc leads polls on about 30%, and its candidate, Friedrich Merz, is the favourite to become the next chancellor.

Maybe it’s not that much different than Antifa protesting Trump.

But it was pretty well-established that those Antifa were totally run by the FBI.

Are these German pro-government protests organic?

Probably not, but they are very big.

You’ve seen these people do everything to stop AfD.

But wait until AfD wins the elections. Then you’re really going to see some very serious shit, for real.

European Conservative:

Public broadcasters are unashamedly taking sides in Germany’s national elections by effectively blocking the second most popular party, the right-wing, anti-immigration Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) from participating in the main TV debate.

The channels ARD and ZDF have decided to only invite Chancellor Olaf Scholz—the Social Democrats’ lead candidate—and opposition leader Friedrich Merz of the centre-right CDU to take part in a live televised debate on February 9th next year. Their reasoning: the CDU/CSU alliance is clearly ahead of all the other parties in opinion polls, and Merz is Scholz’s main rival.

The opposition alliance may be clearly leading in opinion polls (it is currently at 31.5%), but it is not Scholz’s SPD—at 16.5%—but the right-wing AfD that has been consistently in second place for the past one-and-a-half years. It currently has the support of a fifth (19.5%) of the electorate, which should merit a place for its lead candidate, Alice Weidel, in the televised debate. A spokesman for the party said they would sue the broadcasters for failing to take the party seriously.

The AfD’s lesbian warlord is polling above Scholz

The party was sidelined in 2021, too, when ARD and ZDF invited Scholz and the lead candidates of the CDU and the Greens to take part in the debate.

The AfD does not have a real chance of entering government, because all the other parties refuse to cooperate with it, but it is not the job of the publicly funded media—which are supposed to be neutral and politically impartial—to decide AfD’s fate.

The right-wing party was not the only one that expressed its furore at being ignored. The Greens, who are a part of the outgoing government, are polling at 11.5% in fourth place, and also demand a place at the debate. ARD and ZDF had originally intended for their lead candidate, Robert Habeck, to debate AfD’s Alice Wiedel in a separate TV programme, but Habeck declined the invitation.

Germany is occupied by the US military.

They are not allowed to have an independent government policy.

Germany will not be free until they can get rid of the Fatmerican Police Squad that occupies them and loose themselves from this ridiculous and abusive democracy system.

Shit’s gonna get bad no matter the election results

This is supposed to be important news, but whoever Scholz is replaced with is going to be just as bad or worse.

Actually, what will probably happen is that AfD will take power and it will be a total disaster, sabotaged by the usual suspects, then some normal US shill will replace them.

Washington Examiner:

The German Parliament has voted to oust Chancellor Olaf Scholz, dissolving the government and setting the stage for a snap election in February.

In a vote of confidence, 394 members of Parliament voted “no” and 207 voted “yes,” with 116 members abstaining.

The outcome is exactly what Scholz expected when he announced his intention to hold the confidence vote earlier this month. While his party is likely to take a hit in the upcoming election, the snap elections are seen as an opportunity to regroup and restrategize amid political deadlock.

Scholz, leader of the Social Democratic Party, formed a coalition government in 2021 with the support of the left-leaning Free Democratic Party and Green Party.

Disagreements on economic policy ultimately tore the alliance apart when Scholz fired FDP-aligned Finance Minister Christian Lindner last month for refusing to approve tax increases or additional national debt.

The chancellor met with German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier on Monday following the no-confidence vote to formally request the dissolution of Parliament.

The next elections are expected to take place in late February 2025.

German polling suggests the nation will take a strong step toward the Right in the upcoming election after the failure of the ruling coalition.

The conservative Christian Democratic Union and its Bavarian counterpart, the Christian Social Union, are polling highest, followed by the hard-right Alternative for Germany.

If AfD does take power, they need to call for the masses to constantly be out in the streets supporting them and fighting their enemies.

But… in all likelihood, any AfD government would be sabotaged from within before it had time to be sabotaged from without.

We’re here for it, we’ll see. Wish them the best, despite the many stupid views they espouse.

German companies are doing mass layoff, while also asking for more immigrants

Most of the problems people associate with the EU actually come from this one unhinged court that isn’t even part of the EU itself.

If Germany were to actually leave it, it would give all the other countries caught in it some breathing room.

It’s not very likely this will actually happen, but let’s hope it will.

European Conservative:

Germany’s leading opposition party, the centre-right CDU, would be willing to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to be able to pursue tougher asylum policies.

In an interview with The Times, Jens Spahn, a former minister and a prominent member of the CDU, said his party wants to bring down the levels of illegal immigration to Germany once it enters government, but the problem is that over decades, European courts have defined the right to asylum in a broad way that goes far beyond the principles set out in the original ECHR.

…

Germany has had to deal with an influx of hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants since the start of the European migration crisis a decade ago. The CDU was largely to blame for this, as its then-leader, previous chancellor Angela Merkel, pursued a pro-migration policy, opening up Germany’s borders to migrants fleeing war-torn Syria.

…

However, the CDU, which polls suggest will win the snap elections in February, believes these steps do not go far enough, and the party wants to see illegal immigrants who are not eligible for asylum turned back at Germany’s border. “We are learning everything from our mistakes,” Spahn said of the Merkel era.

For effective measures to be put in place, Jens Spahn believes that a coordinated European effort to change European laws on asylum would be needed, otherwise a CDU government would “think again” about Germany’s membership in the ECHR.

There’s a lot more problems coming from this court than just the immigration ones

The European Convention on Human Rights entered into force more than seventy years ago, and all members of the Council of Europe (46 European countries) are signatories. Any person who feels their rights have been violated under the convention can take their case to the European Court of Human Rights.

The court has been accused countless times of advocating liberal-left values and infringing upon the rights of sovereign states, who have no choice but to accept the court’s rulings.

One such recent ruling caused outrage in Germany. The country was condemned and forced to pay compensation to a migrant who had first arrived in Greece before travelling on to Germany, where he was arrested and sent back to Greece. The court inexplicably ruled that Germany had failed to ensure that the man would receive a suitable asylum procedure on arrival in Greece.

The most heated debate on leaving the ECHR has been going on in the United Kingdom, where European court rulings on issues such as the deportation of migrants, climate policies, or whether prisoners can vote at elections have interfered with domestic politics. Many conservative politicians have called for the UK to leave the EHCR, and Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform UK party believes there should be a referendum on the matter.

There has been outrage about ECHR rulings in other countries, too. The court recently condemned both Poland and Romania for the lack of legal recognition for same-sex partnerships, which, they claim, violates the human rights of such couples.

Transnational organizations are experiencing a sandpile style collapse.

No one can explain who they benefit. No one can explain it, because no one is allowed to say “the Jews.”

The entire population of Africa has the basic human right to move to Europe, but you have no right to homeschool your kids

Remember when trolls put up fliers that said “Islam is right about women,” and women protested but couldn’t explain whether it was sexist or anti-Islam?

It wasn’t either. It was just a statement of fact.

Islam is right about women and girls should be married off in their early teens and never become a part of public society. That is what leads to a healthy society.

European Conservative:

An invitation by a mosque in Germany for girls as young as thirteen to take part in a “preparatory marriage course,” has sparked a huge backlash, with centre-right and right-wing parties demanding an explanation.

The invitation was sent out by a mosque in the western city of Mannheim for an event entitled “Girls’ Evenings in the Mosque.” This is part of a series of seminars whose aim is to prepare “girls and women from the age of 13” for marriage. The flyer includes a quote by 10th-century Islamic scholar Al-Tabarani, according to which: “He who marries has completed half of his faith.”

Daily tabloid Bild furiously commented:”A course that is openly intended to prepare children for marriage. And all this in the middle of Germany!”

The centre-right CDU party wants an investigation by the city council, saying that “marriage from the age of 13 has no place in Germany!”

…

Some conservative Islamic scholars argue that Islamic law permits child marriage, as the Quran specifies that girls can be married upon reaching maturity, which conservative scholars define as puberty.

As Bild reports, the mosque, the Omar Al-Faruq Centre, is located in the Neckarstadt-West district, which has one of the highest proportions of citizens with a migration background.

The centre said that the the aim of the seminars “is to strengthen the self-confidence of the participants and to discuss topics such as education, self-determination, sexuality and equal partnerships openly and critically.” They apologised for the invitation which they say was misleading, and stressed that they have never allowed for child marriages to take place in the mosque.

…

The Omar Al-Faruq Centre was monitored by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), Germany’s domestic intelligence agency following the arrest of a member of the centre in 2017 in Iraq. The man had fought for the Islamic State terrorist organisation, and the imam of the mosque had been known for spreading radical salafist ideology. The mosque says it has since distanced itself from extremist ideology, and the BfV confirmed they are no longer monitoring the centre.

German right-wingers complaining about this is a complete outrage.

“We stand with women, homosexuals, and Jews because we are against Islam” is the worst possible narrative ever. No one is going to go along with that. It appeals to exactly no one.

This is an old graph:

In a democracy, if you get too many votes, the government will just ban you.

Remix:

A motion to ban the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, signed by 112 MPs, has been handed to Bundestag President Bärbel Bas of the far-left Social Democrats (SPD), according to reports from German state media ARD and ZDF.

If the motion passes, the Bundestag will initial proceedings that will head to the top court of Germany, the Constitutional Court, to determine whether the AfD can be banned. There are 733 seats in the Bundestag. The motion only needs a simple majority to pass.

The AfD is the second most popular party in the country, and it is increasingly so popular that it is making it very difficult for the ruling parties to form coalitions without it. As it grows, the establishment parties are rallying together to remove this rival from the democratic process. Many of the top proponents of a ban, such as CDU MP Marco Wanderwitz — who lost his local election to an AfD politician — operate under the motto that they are “saving democracy.”

Marco Wanderwitz, couldn’t save his hairline, so he’s gonna make up for it by saving democracy

The MPs who back the motion come from a variety of different party factions. Till Steffen, the parliamentary leader of the Greens group, said that 50 members of the Greens signed on to the motion to ban the party.

Most of the German establishment is working towards a ban, but there is disagreement about the pace and timing of such a ban. Some are also worried that the ban will backfire and make the AfD more popular than ever. For one, a ban could take years, and second, the country’s top court may reject the ban, which would be a catastrophic outcome for the German establishment. It should be noted that the country’s top court usually issues rulings friendly to the establishment.

Some Green MPs are against a ban, at least for now.

…

Wanderwitz (CDU), however, wants an AfD ban now, stating, “It has to happen quickly” due to upcoming elections.

One key legal plank on any potential ban is the AfD’s designation from the Office of the Protection of the Constitution, which is currently led by Thomas Haldenwang. It was expected that the BfV would reclassify the AfD this year with the more damaging designation of a “confirmed threat” to the constitution. However, this designation will have to wait due to upcoming elections, as it would be a violation of the “equal opportunity” so close to the election date.

There is no way that AfD would ever ge allowed to have power as long as Germany is occupied by tens of thousands of American soldiers.

Apparently, people don’t think about it, but Germany is a country under a brutal military occupation, and the American don’t just let the Germans do whatever they feel like doing.

The AfD is currently polling at just under 20%

Protesting immigrants?

In Germany?

Next thing you know, they’re going to start gassing them.

The world needs to speak out against this town of 4,000 people not wanting 500 immigrants now, before they start turning people into lampshades and soap.

Remix:

As Germany endures its ongoing migrant crisis, the government continues to allocate migrants across the countryside, effectively transforming towns across the nation, many of which have been culturally and ethnically homogenous for hundreds of years. One of the latest cases is the Bavarian town of Rott am Inn, which is seeing wide-scale demonstrations against plans to create a refugee accommodation that will house 500 people.

Protesters gathered at the district council building in Seeon, where they are furious over plans to import 500 migrants, which would then make up more than 10 percent of the town’s population of 4,000.

Notably, residents are blaming the Christian Socialist Union (CSU), which is the political powerhouse in Bavaria and effectively runs the state, with Markus Söder, the minister-president, as the head of the state. In fact, Söder had specifically promised just six months ago to the town that no such asylum home would be built.

Markus Söder, pictured here laughing at the people who voted for him

The CSU is in a tight alliance with the Christian Democrats (CDU), which has paid lip service to growing rage over mass immigration but has effectively done nothing about the issue in the places it holds power, including in Bavaria. Notably, Angela Merkel, the former CDU chancellor of Germany, is credited with starting the migration crisis in 2016.

“Mr. Söder, you have the power to put an end to this,” reads a poster from a citizens’ initiative. Another reads: “Citizens are still afraid.”

According to the Bayerischer Rundfunk, Heike Bachert from a citizens’ initiative criticizes that there are too many migrants for the small town, with plans for them to move into a former production hall.

It is “no place for humane accommodations,” said Bachert.

Acceptance among the population is low and continues to decline. Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) announced a large-scale repatriation offensive last year — but only “something Mickey Mouse-like” happened. “It’s really no wonder that people are losing trust in this policy.”

District administrators from all over Germany met at the Seeon Monastery for the annual meeting of the German District Council from Sept. 9-10, and oone of the topics at the meeting is migration policy. On Monday in Seeon, Söder called for a sharp reduction in immigration.

“What works in Denmark must ultimately work here too,” he said, referring to Denmark’s strict immigration policy.

Well, Denmark never threw an innocent pawn shop owner into a cage with an eagle and a bear.

Germany has different rules. Germany has a historical obligation to completely destroy themselves with mass immigration because they built a roller coaster into a homicidal chamber with an electric floor.

Another picture from the protest. Notice the anal flag. There has to be an anal flag everywhere these days.

This is more proof that the baby boomers are purposefully destroying society, and that this is a root cause of our current predicament.

Boomers appear to want this whole thing to burn down before they die. Young people, meanwhile, understand that they are going to have to live with these decisions the boomers have made for a long time – until they get the opportunity to check out in 60 years or whatever.

The boomers were the first generation to hate their own children and to want them to do badly.

Remix:

More than 9,000 young people headed to the polls in the Under-18 election before the state elections in Saxony and Thuringia, and the Alternative for Germany (AfD) crushed the competition in both votes, leaving the German political establishment reeling and issuing warnings.

The youth vote comes just days before the real vote in regional elections in Saxony and Thuringia, where the AfD is slated to win the elections with over 30 percent of the vote.

In Thuringia, the AfD scored 37.4 percent, an increase of almost 21 points compared to the 2019 youth election. The CDU gained around 7 points, jumping to 17.8 percent. The SPD scored 10.6 percent, a drop of over 3 points, and the Left Party 8.8 percent, a drop of 2.4 points.

The BSW would reach 6.9 percent from a standing start. The Greens, however, have crashed, losing a whopping 18 points and standing now at only 3.7 percent.

Results in Thuringia

Results in Saxony

In other words, the push by Greens to allow under-18s to vote in elections may be leaving many in the party second-guessing their move.

The vote is not binding and is seen as a political project used for “political education,” but serves as a barometer of where the youth’s voting intentions lie and who they could be voting for in the future.

The vote was conducted at 150 polling stations in Saxony alone, according to the Saxony Children and Youth Council (KJRS), and saw the AfD there score 34.5 percent of the vote. The CDU came in second with 16.2 percent of the vote and the Left in third with 11.8 percent.

The Greens are at an abysmal 5.7 percent, while the SPD is at 8.5 percent.

In a surprise, only 4.8 percent of youth voted for the BSW. The party is polling quite high in the east, but it is supported by older former Left Party voters, many of whom yearn for a return to communism.

…

Despite the AfD’s expected strong showing in upcoming elections, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) is expected to seek out other partners to rule in both states, namely the far-left BSW. Both parties have vowed not to cooperate with the AfD and they may score enough votes to ensure this outcome unless the AfD pulls off a larger margin of victory than expected.

Well.

The AfD is not going to be allowed to rule anything, regardless of how many votes they get.

Germany remains occupied by the United States, and so their government serves at the pleasure of the Jews in Washington.

The country does not have the ability to simply elect a new government that disagrees with the occupying foreign army. It’s not possible.

Why are they even holding it in the western part of the country?

AfD is probably the biggest party in Germany.

But the government is still the government, and the government pays people to riot against AfD. They also organize the intelligence apparatus against them, the normal cops, everything.

Does it seem like this whole concept of democracy – “you just vote for whoever you like and then they do the policies they said they would do” – is working?

Does anyone on either side feel that this is working?

European Conservative:

Left-wing militants, private companies, and municipal officials are all conspiring to harass Alternative für Deutschland’s (AfD) annual conference, which will go ahead this weekend in the west German city of Essen—after failed attempts by the city to completely stop it.

Fresh off the back of electoral wins that saw the populist party come in second in European elections—despite multiple scandals and near-constant state harassment—AfD top brass Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla will seek to renew their mandate at the head of the populist party against increasingly radical grassroots. Additional security protocols are being implemented to fend off “several tens of thousands” expected left-wing protestors.

Passive aggressive hostility against the AfD came from Essen city council, which has arranged for EU and LGBT flags to be flown around the congress location. The municipal authorities also aimed to temporarily rename the subway station adjacent to the venue location to ‘Diversity’, a move labelled “embarrassing” by online observers.

There are fears of violent attacks on AfD attendees as well as protests immobilising the city centre. Police are uncertain about the total number of protesters, but said at least 45,000 are expected at a protest meeting organised by the city of Essen, with speakers from the CDU and the German Evangelical Church. Antifa and other left-wing groups have said publicly that they want to use violence to stop the AfD congress.

Recent months have seen premeditated attacks on AfD activists and candidates, including an botched assassination attempt on one party candidate in the city of Mannheim earlier this month.

Despite being the second most popular party in Germany, the AfD had to secure a court order against city authorities in Essen in order to host the congress at a local exhibition centre. Local CDU mayor Thomas Kufen led efforts to cancel the event, claiming the populist party is in violation of the German constitution.

Well, I was hesitant about attempts to shut down what is probably the biggest party in Germany.

Then I found out Thomas Kufen supported it.

Thomas Kufen

The guy’s just got an honest face.

If he says people need shut down, I trust his judgement.

The riots are expected to be mostly peaceful

Did people even know about this?

Or was it done in secret?

I guarantee that no one voted on it.

European Conservative:

The German government has broken records for the number of foreigners being given citizenship, with official statistics reporting 200,100 naturalisations in 2023 alone. The main beneficiaries of this trend are young men from Syria.

Under Angela Merkel and the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU), borders were seriously weakened. Now even the CDU has warned that the country’s migration policies have “taken a completely wrong turn.” Reactions to the mass naturalisation of Germany’s 14 million foreign-born population—a priority for the ruling left-liberal ‘traffic light’ coalition led by Chancellor Olaf Scholz—help explain the surging popularity of the sovereigntist Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) at the polls.

The German Federal Statistics Office reported a jump of more than 40% in naturalisations since 2021, with 75,000 Syrians alone receiving a German passport and the right to vote just last year.

Approximately 5.3 million immigrants who have been residents in Germany for the past ten years could be eligible to receive citizenship under a new law. Future applicants could be required to be residents of Germany for a mere five years (under certain circumstances, three years) before receiving citizenship—down from a previous eight-year residency requirement.

…

The Bundestag has been debating migration reform since January, aiming to reduce waiting times to attain citizenship from eight years to five—or, in the case of migrants demonstrating “special integration achievements,” three. This occurred against the backdrop of official statistics that showed Germany receiving 352,000 asylum applications in 2023 alone (not counting Germany’s one million Ukrainian refugees).

I am really against democracy, because it never represents the will of the masses of people, nor does it protect their interests, which is what any government should do.

But if you had referendum votes on issues, like “should we flood the country with low IQ, violent hordes of foreigners who hate us all so they can live on welfare and commit crimes?”, people would vote the right way.

Some percentage of white women would vote “YES,” but it would probably only be about 60% of women, meaning the “nays” would win out every time.

The thing is, when you give the voting rights to foreigners who will vote alongside white women, that plan no longer works.

The Krauts keep oppressing them, but they keep coming anyway