The CATO Institute is a libertarian group. Clearly, there are many things that the Daily Stormer would disagree with them about.

However, the work they do with polling – asking people crazy questions that no other group that commissions serious polls would ever ask – is God’s work.

These numbers probably are not surprising, but they are nonetheless shocking.

Campus Reform:

Nearly 3 in 10 young Americans support the government being able to put cameras in your home to surveil you, according to a new survey.

The survey from the libertarian CATO Institute found that Americans under the age of 30 support the government installing cameras in private homes with the intended purpose of stopping crime and abuse. The survey comes days after the reports that Amazon will pay over $30 million in settlements to the Federal Trade Commission for privacy violations, including a revelation that Ring camera devices were being used to illegally spy on individuals in their homes.

It was just a big mix-up.

Although we have to ask what kind of retard installs Amazon devices in their home, especially when there are all these news articles about how they admit to recording everything you do and accessing that information.

The survey asked respondents: “Would you favor or oppose the government installing surveillance cameras in every household to reduce domestic violence, abuse, and other illegal activity?” Just 14% of Americans said they would be in favor, including just 6% who were strongly in favor; fully three-quarters of Americans were opposed to the idea, including 68% who were strongly opposed.

But young Americans were twice as likely than the rest of the population to support the idea, the survey found. Nearly 3 in 10 people in the 18-29 age group, 29%, said they supported the idea, including 14% who were strongly in favor. Still, more than half of the age group, 53%, were opposed, including 44% who were strongly opposed. Support for the idea dwindled as respondents got older: 20% of respondents age 30-44 supported cameras in homes; just 6% of 45-54 year-olds and 55-64 year-olds supported it; just 5% of 65+ year-olds were in favor.

A $5.8 million settlement from Amazon will address a lawsuit from the FTC claiming that Amazon-owned home security company Ring allowed security failures that led to privacy invasions of multiple Ring users. According to a press release from the FTC, Ring deceived its customers by allowing employees unrestricted access to customers’ videos from their home security cameras. In one instance, a Ring employee illicitly watched thousands of videos of female Ring customers in their bedrooms and bathrooms.

Ring also failed to protect its customers from hackers, the FTC alleged. Ring’s lax security measures enabled hackers to view videos from thousands of customers, and in some cases harass and even proposition some customers by hacking into the two-way communication function.

…

Furthermore, former NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden warned this week that the government can and will use new technology to spy on Americans. “If we think about what we saw in 2013 and the capabilities of governments today, 2013 seems like child’s play,” Snowden told The Guardian.

“We trusted the government not to screw us,” he added. “But they did. We trusted the tech companies not to take advantage of us. But they did. That is going to happen again, because that is the nature of power.”

Well, it’s the nature of Jewish power.

I don’t think we can assume that non-Jews, in a society not controlled by the Jews, would behave this way.

If we decide that no one in society can have any power, we’re going to have a lot of complications in managing the society.

It seems like we should just try to have better people in power.

This is why we need more and more immigration – Americans are racists, and they need to be punished.

There is no more fitting punishment for being against immigration than to be vibrantly culturally enriched with the untold benefits of population replacement level mass immigration by third world peasants.

These massive waves of brown people are making our country better by overloading its vibrancy levels. White people will greatly benefit from this, but it is also a way to hurt them for being so evil and hating the color of the skin.

RT:

A new Cato Institute poll suggests Joe Biden’s policies, which critics say encourage surging immigration may be out of step with public opinion, as Americans broadly prefer low levels of new residents flowing into the country.

The poll, which was released on Monday, showed that 68% of Americans prefer a “low level” of immigration, compared with 23% who would tolerate a “high level.” In fact, respondents in every political category favored low immigration numbers, including 79% of Republicans, 58% of Democrats, 68% of independents and 58% of immigrants themselves. An additional 9% said they wanted immigration to be stopped entirely.

Drilling down further into the numbers suggests that low-immigration sentiment may be even stronger than the survey responses indicate. The US typically admits about a million immigrants per year, and among those who said they’d tolerate a high level of immigration, 27% would prefer the inflows to be lower than they are currently. An additional 22% said they wanted the total to be kept at a million.

In other words, only 51% of the 23% of Americans who said they favoured high levels of immigration actually wanted the yearly influx to increase, the Cato figures showed. And that’s coming from a research outfit that has advocated for expanded and deregulated immigration.

The institute appeared to try to explain away those results, saying, “The fact that 1 million sounds like a large number may have influenced answers. However, out of 300 million people, 1 million is 0.33.”

It’s weird how the more invaders there are, the more support for invasion there is

Public views on President Joe Biden’s policies suggest that most Americans disagree with Cato’s immigration messaging, however. A Washington Post-ABC News poll released on Sunday showed that just 33% of Americans approve of how Biden has handled the US-Mexico border issue since taking office in January. Even among Democrats, while 94% of respondents said they approved of his overall performance, only 63% gave him a thumbs-up when it came to managing border matters.

A separate poll, conducted by Harvard CAPS/Harris in mid-June, showed that 74% of registered voters consider the surge in illegal border crossings that has taken place since Biden took office to be a “crisis.”

…

Although 58% of Democrats in the Cato survey said they preferred low levels of immigration, many of those same respondents claimed those who wanted inflows to be reduced were motivated by racism. About 70% of Democrats said racist beliefs motivated those who wanted immigration to be reduced. Ironically, more than one in four of those who said they preferred high levels of immigration – who were primarily Democrats – separately said they wanted the yearly totals to be lower than the typical level of around a million.

It turns out, Democrats truly are the real racists.

Sickening.

Those million per year come here LEGALLY, which means that it’s good to be racially replaced.

If those Democrats don’t want to live in a vibrant democracy based on our values, they should move to Vladimir Putin’s communist Russia that they love so much.

Joe Biden is the biggest gift Putin has ever received, and now we know why – Democrats are directly involve in the Russian white supremacy conspiracy to lower immigration that they accused Donald Trump of doing.

Moscow Beijing Joe continues to refuse to stand with Israel. He only knelt before the president of Israel and swore allegiance to trick Jews into staying on the Democrat plantation so he can get the Jewish vote.

If Biden wanted to do something good for Israel, he could at least send them some more DNA tests so they can keep their nation racially pure.