Enrique Tarrio, the head of the Proud Boys, was exposed way back in January as a long-time FBI informant. Given what we are now seeing with regards to the large scale FBI involvement in staging the 1/6 hoax – and the fact that the Proud Boys are at the center of that – it is clear that Tarrio was a key figure in this entire sham.

The Proud Boys, along with the Oath Keepers (which has also been exposed as being run by feds), were the most prominent agitators at the otherwise peaceful protest. Just as an example: while the police were opening up the doors for people to walk into the Capitol building, Proud Boys were breaking out windows.

That main image that everyone saw nonstop of the windows being broken out when the media was calling this “an attack” was Proud Boy Dominic Pezzola, who brought a Proud Boys riot shield to the event.

Many of the Proud Boys brought these shields and are being charged for other acts of actual violence.

This was some of the only “violence” that took place at the event.

Joe Biggs, another prominent member of the Proud Boys, has also been exposed as an FBI informant by his defense attorney. He’s trying to use the old “but I’m working for you!” defense for charges related to January 6.

Tarrio himself was not at the event. He had been banned from entering Washington by a federal judge on January 5 (something that I’ve not ever heard of before), presumably because the FBI knew what was going to happen and did not want it coming out in court documents that he is an informant. Despite the fact that Tarrio was the leader of the group, and was headed to Washington ostensibly to lead the march on the Capitol with his boys, he is not facing any charges relating to the event, while four other members of the group are charged with criminal conspiracy.

The court documents showing Tarrio’s history working for the FBI were published later in January by the AP.

(Note that the rank and file of the organization probably didn’t know what what was going on, but they were being trained as a paramilitary group to be used for staging this kind of psychological operation.)

You would think that any functional political movement would immediately purge anyone who was proven to be linked to the FBI, no?

Well, it turns out the current MAGA movement is just as fond of FBI informants as the old Alt-Right.

This is up right now on The Gateway Pundit:

The article claims that the fed Tarrio was banned from his bank accounts. Maybe that is news in some form, but this is an outright shill article – it goes on to outright shill Bitcoin donations for him – literally inserting a QR code to send him money!

I read halfway down the page in shock, and then thought “someone should contact Cassandra Fairbanks about this.” I knew she worked at TGP and have also considered her one of the only women in the right that is reliably useful. I thought: “maybe she can get this addressed.” Then I scrolled up the page to find her name in the byline!

Cassandra Fairbanks is defending this fed who helped set up the 1/6 boondoggle and is promoting donations to him!

If you want to pitch in to help him, you can do so on Zelle by sending to fundthewest@gmail.com or Bitcoin here: pic.twitter.com/C91cTDVJ9B

— Cassandra Fairbanks (@CassandraRules) July 7, 2021

Why???

We are in the middle of this public discussion about the FBI involvement in the hoax, thanks to Tucker Carlson and Darren Beattie – and people on the right are shilling one of the key FBI informants involved???

Beattie just wrote a big piece about Stuart Rhodes, who is the leader of the Oath Keepers, the other main group agitating on 1/6.

I think I am not alone in assuming that his next article on the topic is going to be about Tarrio, who transformed Gavin McInnes’ fun times drinking club into a paramilitary street-fighting organization, which was then deployed for this “insurrection” hoax. Court documents show that Tarrio was working as basically an undercover agent, infiltrating various different groups, over a period of years before joining the Proud Boys.

McInnes was run out of the organization after being hounded by the feds because the Proud Boys got in one single fight, defending themselves from Antifa who ambushed them on the street. Under Tarrio, the Proud Boys were given free rein to go out on the street in paramilitary gear and fight on the streets – even in liberal cities like Portland – virtually without impediment. Under Tarrio, the FBI was preparing this group for exactly what we saw on January 6.

What is Cassandra doing???

Just as a note: this story might not even be true. The article contains a supposed letter from his bank saying he’s being dropped.

However, it doesn’t take a genius to fake that letter. And remember: in April of 2020, Tarrio also claimed to have been “debanked” and shilled donations at the time. The first time it was Chase and this is Capital One, but in my personal experience, when you get banned from something, you’re banned from an entire industry.

But that isn’t the point.

The point is: what kind of political movement refuses to expel and then goes on to celebrate people who are confirmed to have been government infiltrators trying to bring down the movement?

The Alt-Right did this big time, which resulted in it becoming a laughingstock that destroyed untold numbers of lives. But I had thought both that the Alt-Right had a unique character that created that situation. Furthermore, I thought the current itineration of the American dissident right would be able to learn from a totally failed movement from just a few years back.

But apparently, everyone in the American right will just ignore it when someone is exposed as an FBI infiltrator, and just keep going as if they never were exposed as such. It is actually pathological. I’m not really even able to understand what is going on. It was absolutely shocking to me during the Alt-Right days that people were exposed definitively as being in active communication with the FBI, or working with people who were self-admitted informants, and that people just pretended this didn’t happen.

I still have people come at me personally saying that it was bad for me to not accept FBI informants, and that I am a bad person for being against them, because they are nice people who believe in the cause.

That appears to be the only possible underlying explanation here: people become friends with the informants, or otherwise like them personally (from listening to them on podcasts or livestream and thereby simulating friendship), and then it just somehow doesn’t register in their brains when it comes out that the person is a literal infiltrator.

What’s more – I’m not seeing people coming at Cassandra over this. The article was just posted a few hours ago at time of writing, but I’ve checked a few channels (including the Twitter replies), and haven’t seen a backlash.

Do people just not know that these court documents came out showing that Tarrio was an informant? Is that the charitable take here? Imagine being the FBI: “our guy got burned – oh no, wait, actually, these retards don’t even care he’s working for us, LOL.”

Understand me: there is nothing in the world more serious than this. You simply cannot allow people in your political movement to be involved with the FBI. It is 100% nonviable. You have to expel FBI-linked people, you have to expel people who defend FBI-linked people. That is the very most basic thing that any political movement must do, and if a political movement cannot do that, it is a joke and it will do nothing but chew up and spit out anyone who gets involved in it.

Again, I can say it six million more times: the Alt-Right became a meat-grinder, destroying the lives of everyone linked to it. Every day, I ask God to forgive me for my involvement in the Alt-Right, and for not seeing sooner what was going on with all of these freaks who had somehow wiggled their way into the position of being the public face of the movement.

If you can’t separate your personal friendships from your political movement, you need to be in a knitting club, not a political movement.

Cassandra Fairbanks and The Gateway Pundit should be asked what exactly they are trying to do by promoting this FBI informant and shilling money for them. If they do not back away from this, you have to consider them hostile agents. There is no other way to do this. Nothing about this is personal. There is simply no reality in which any political movement can survive while tolerating known FBI informants.

People get what they deserve.

This is not a game.

The phone call. https://t.co/jwuiwu8CCv

— Cassandra Fairbanks 🕊⏳ (@CassandraRules) February 25, 2020

If you made a list of the people who got Donald Trump elected, Julian Assange would be number one on that list.

But even whilst Barack Obama was fine leaving Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, the Trump Administration made a point to pull him out, and are in the process of bringing him back to America to spend his life in prison for doing journalism.

I assumed that this was the work of Mike Pompeo, and that just like with everything else, Trump just put his head down and said “okay Mike, you’re the boss, Mike. Are there any Jewish dicks you need me to suck today, Mike?”

But we now have a Jew Trump associate who was trying to pull a Harvey Weinstein on Cassandra Fairbanks by saying that Trump personally set this all up.

I don’t know if it’s true. But can you imagine? Hunting down your number one ally and having him tortured in prison?

Just so you understand – Schwartz was an online friend of Fairbanks and was bragging about shit to try to get laid with this spicy Latina single mother.

This is just shameful.

I hope it means the faggot Grenell gets fired. At least.

I’m shocked that retarded MAGApedes aren’t incensed over Trump hunting down Assange.

It’s just such an evil act.

POLITICO:

Attorneys for Julian Assange, who is fighting a U.S. extradition request on espionage and computer hacking charges, plan to introduce evidence in the WikiLeaks founder’s extradition hearing involving President Donald Trump’s new intel chief Richard Grenell.

Gareth Peirce, a lawyer representing Assange in his extradition proceedings in London, plans to argue this week that the process to try to extradite her client was abused from early on. Representatives for Assange’s defense team say they expect to introduce recordings and screenshots of communications of a close Grenell associate, including a secondhand claim that Grenell was acting on the president’s orders.

Grenell’s sudden embroilment in Assange’s extradition fight comes at an inconvenient time, as Democrats and national security veterans criticize him as ill-suited and unqualified to be the acting director of national intelligence. And it threatens to spotlight his close relationship with President Trump, feeding the widespread perception that the president is politicizing intelligence work for partisan ends.

At the heart of the Assange team’s argument is an ABC News report from last April alleging that, while serving as Trump’s ambassador to Germany, Grenell told Assange’s Ecuadorean hosts that the U.S. government would not pursue the death penalty for Assange if Ecuador allowed British officials to enter its embassy in London and arrest him.

Assange’s legal team will claim that Grenell’s role was more extensive than previously known, and that it corrupted the extradition process early on. The suggestion will be that the U.S. was so desperate to get Assange in its custody that American officials, via Grenell, agreed in advance to take a particular sentence off the table before even allowing a trial and sentencing to play out.

The WikiLeaks founder’s attorneys are also expected to present evidence that they believe shows Trump explicitly tasked Grenell with making the offer, thereby politicizing the process. One of Assange’s lawyers, Edward Fitzgerald, hinted at this argument in his opening statement on Monday, when he said that Assange’s prosecution was “not motivated by genuine concerns for criminal justice but politics.”

The evidence submitted this week will include new materials submitted to Assange’s legal team by political activist and journalist Cassandra Fairbanks, a staunch defender of Assange who has worked for the Russian state-run news site Sputnik and the far-right outlet Gateway Pundit. She is expected to be listed as a formal witness in the case.

Fairbanks recorded two phone calls she had with one of Grenell’s close associates, Arthur Schwartz, and took screenshots of their conversations about Assange and Grenell. She also gave the materials to the nonprofit transparency group Property of the People, which provided them to Politico.

He told me a deal was made to arrest Assange in October 2018. I just put the pieces together — which is what made him freak out. https://t.co/TzrZjV4yNJ

— Cassandra Fairbanks 🕊⏳ (@CassandraRules) February 26, 2020

The screenshots and phone calls span from October 2018 to September 2019. In them, Schwartz tells Fairbanks that Grenell was “taking orders from the president” when he got involved in facilitating Assange’s arrest and urges her not to disclose what she’s been told about Grenell’s role in the process.

But Schwartz appeared to grow frustrated and fearful after Fairbanks tweeted, on Sept. 10, 2019, that Grenell “was the one who worked out the deal for Julian Assange’s arrest.”

“I don’t want to go to jail,” Schwartz told Fairbanks in a September 2019 phone call, accusing her of posting “classified information” in the tweet. Fairbanks posted the tweet around the time Grenell’s name was being floated to replace John Bolton as Trump’s national security adviser.

“Please. I’m begging you,” Schwartz says in the recording. “They look at you, they see that we speak, that’s bad.”

Grenell’s entry into the legal fight over Assange highlights the fact that, in since-deleted tweets from 2016, he promoted the WikiLeaks disclosures targeting Democrats; later, in April 2017, then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo labeled the group a “hostile intelligence service” aided by Russia.

And the suggestion that one of Grenell’s close associates who was not in government may have been privy to conversations surrounding a sensitive law enforcement operation will likely raise more questions about his fitness to lead the entire U.S. intelligence community. A spokesperson for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence did not return a request for comment.

It’s not clear whether Schwartz was actually privy to anything classified, or whether Grenell told Schwartz anything about his involvement in Assange’s arrest. “I highly doubt I would tell her anything real, accurate or of any importance,” Schwartz told Politico, adding that Fairbanks is “not someone that I trust.”

“I barely remember that conversation,” Schwartz said. “I remember that she was slinging mud at a friend of mine on social media and I wanted her to stop. Knowing that she’s not too bright and easily manipulated, I threw a bunch of nonsense at her that I thought would get her to stop. And she did stop.” Schwartz also said he did not recall chatting with Fairbanks over Signal, a secure messaging app.

In a written timeline Fairbanks provided to Assange’s legal team that was also obtained by Politico, Fairbanks said Schwartz told her on October 30, 2018—two weeks before prosecutors accidentally revealed in a court filing that DOJ had secretly filed criminal charges against Assange, and nearly six months before Assange was arrested—that the U.S. government would be going into the embassy to arrest him, and implied that Ecuador would allow it to happen.

That same month, Grenell had secured Ecuador’s cooperation with the arrest, via the pledge for no death penalty—but his role was not revealed publicly until ABC News did so in April 2019.

“I need to let Julian’s lawyers and family know that the president personally ordered an anti WikiLeaks ambassador from a country uninvolved in the case to secure Julian’s arrest,” Fairbanks told Schwartz on October 30, 2018, via the encrypted messaging app Signal, according to screenshots provided to Politico. “It’s clear he’s a political prisoner and his health is deteriorating rapidly. I don’t know if it will matter to them, but it seems important, and they should know.”

Schwartz was not sympathetic, but didn’t dispute her claims as he sought to persuade her not to reveal the impending operation to Assange.

“I wouldn’t get so emotional until you see exactly what that worthless piece of garbage did,” he replied, referring to Assange. “There’s a good reason the death penalty was on the table.”

So here’s the story about that phone call and why I recorded it… and another phone call. #FreeJulian #PoliticalPersecution https://t.co/iJiFO2osRQ

— Cassandra Fairbanks 🕊⏳ (@CassandraRules) February 26, 2020

Fairbanks was incredulous: “Are you sure it’s not just Clinton friends taking some random photos and pinning it on him for revenge or something?”

“Forget about pictures,” Schwartz replied, possibly suggesting that he had access to non-public information. “There were other things that happened because he did what he did that led to horrible suffering and death. I have zero sympathy for him. Doubt you will either when/if it comes out publicly.”
Fairbanks visited Assange on March 27, 2019, roughly 2 weeks before his arrest, and relayed what she’d heard from Schwartz in October, she told Pierce.

On March 29, Schwartz told Fairbanks in another call obtained by Politico that “there’s an investigation now, into people at State” into who leaked Fairbanks the information about the operation. “I’m sorry,” she replied.

Schwartz is well known in Washington as a Trumpworld fixer who often criticizes journalists and other perceived enemies on his Twitter account. According to the New York Times, Schwartz is a “central player” in an effort to “discredit news organizations deemed hostile to President Trump by publicizing damaging information about journalists.”

But last September, he appeared worried about being exposed himself.

“I don’t want to go to jail,” Schwartz told Fairbanks in the September call. Fairbanks denied posting anything classified, telling Schwartz that she had just been referring to the ABC News report, from months earlier, about Grenell’s role in the Assange operation.

Schwartz was not convinced. “Ric’s role is classified,” he said. “You can’t do that … you are posting things that are classified, that no one knows, that has not been reported…I know what’s been reported, I see what you’re tweeting, what you’re tweeting is not what was reported. Someone’s going to go to jail. You need to stop this.”

“Yeah, Julian’s in jail right now, because of this,” replied Fairbanks.

“I don’t want to go to jail,” Schwartz retorted.

“Alright, well, I’ll delete my tweet, only because you’re saying you’ll get in trouble,” Fairbanks replied.

“I don’t want to go to jail,” Schwartz repeated. “Please. I’m begging you … They look at you, they see that we speak, that’s bad. He’s [Grenell] is taking orders from the president. OK? So you’re going to punish me because he took orders from the president? I’m begging you, I’m begging you, please.”

Who knows if Trump was actually involved or if it was all Pompeo.

It doesn’t really matter.

Either way, Trump has shown a consistent pattern of punishing people who helped him get elected.

Paul Manafort hasn’t been pardoned. Roger Stone hasn’t been pardoned. The Proud Boys are still in jail. Me and Alex Jones are still kicked off of everything.

Donald Trump simply does not give a shit about anyone.

Good on Cassandra for getting ahold of this information and putting it out there to help Julian.

Cassandra, if we ever get a chance to meet, the first course of bat soup is on me.

I don’t believe in female-on-male rape. I have never really thought about female-on-female rape (I guess with fingers and/or an object), but if someone was going to do it, they would have this face. Amirite? 

Jewish Zika Baby Laura Loomer, famous for being the only remaining employee at Jew Ezra Levant’s The Rebel Media and for hoaxing that her tires were slashed, is being accused of RAPE.

Note that Loomer is also anti-free speech, and accused me and weev of being terrorists for making fun of Heather “Ho-Hos” Heyer. She is an Alt-Lite fake Trump supporter who associates Trump-support with being a kike.

The rape allegations are a little bit confusing. I’m confused how a woman can “rape” someone, unless it is with drugs and an object. I do not believe in female-on-male rape.

So I’m piecing this together just like you.

First we have Cassandra Fairbanks calling Laura Loomer “Harvey Weinstein with a vag.”

That appears to be the place the allegations began.

Then Lauren Southern got involved – is she the rape victim?

Possibly so.

She first posted a legal threat from the kike Loomer.

Very nice 🙃 @LauraLoomer pic.twitter.com/qIlzjwvHv0

— Lauren Southern (@Lauren_Southern) October 20, 2017

She then entered a Loomer thread about Fairbanks’ allegations, saying she was considering doing a video about people that Loomer is blackmailing.

She also claims that there are “reports” of some kind in existence, apparently relating to Loomer’s alleged “rape” and/or “rapes.”

Then Loomer publicly threatened to sue.

Then make a video you vile Canadian cunt.

I will see you and Cassandra Fairbanks in court for the false rape accusations you are spewing. https://t.co/IH0gUTHzNI

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) October 20, 2017

Lauren responded to that.

>Make a video you vile ****
>I'll sue you if you say anything

Rude 🙃 https://t.co/RGImNxAapG

— Lauren Southern (@Lauren_Southern) October 20, 2017

Lauren then brought up the tires thing.

Her last Tweet, late Friday, was a Shakespeare quote about the truth coming out.

"Truth will come to light."
-William Shakespeare

— Lauren Southern (@Lauren_Southern) October 21, 2017

Meanwhile, over on Loomer’s page, she’s insinuating Fairbanks and Southern are part of a goyim conspiracy against her to discredit her supposed investigation into the Vegas shooting.

You don't "Make America Great Again" by giving a platform to opportunistic individuals who falsely accuse others of heinous crimes.

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) October 21, 2017

There are individuals who are being paid to create disruption and sabotage my #LasVegasShooting investigation. THAT IS HOW EFFECTIVE I AM!

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) October 21, 2017

Sources in intelligence have told me certain people are being paid by deep state operatives because I am getting too close to the truth.

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) October 21, 2017

The Jewess is getting “too close to the truth”…!

And that’s why two goyim are accusing her of some as of yet unknown kind of “rape.”

This is how stupid Jews think you are – Lauren Southern is involved in some kind of non-Jewish “deep state” conspiracy to stop a Jew from finding the truth about Vegas.

As far as rape – idk.

But if there are any women I can picture drugging and dildoing other women, Laura Loomer would be at the top of the list of women I could picture doing that. If I had a list. Which I don’t have.

Maybe I should have such a list.

Anyway, as weird as it may sound, I’m not sure that I would label the claim that Laura Loomer behaved in an inappropriate homosexual/lesbian manner with Fairbanks or Southern.

Jews are very weird people.

Obviously, this isn’t something that I would have thought of on my own, and all we have right now are these tweets, so I have no idea.

But Lauren is saying there are “reports” of some type, apparently implying documentation.

So…

Yeah.

Weird, weird story.

I’m not going to assume anything. But I will keep you updated on this.

PS:

Guy on /pol/ says he got “Loomed”:

I have no way to confirm this (THAT’S FOR YOU, LOOMER LAWYERS), of course. Just a random /pol/ post.

But it isn’t something that strikes me as especially surprising.

And forced oral sex at threat of blackmail could be done to a woman just the same as it was ALLEGEDLY done to this /pol/ock.

As we saw with Weinstein, the sexual stuff was all about humiliating the goyim, and I could see Loomer being totally ON THAT.

Here’s her face again, in case you forgot it: