If Dylann Roof was black, this is the only picture of him the media would allow you to see.

Let it be clear that there is no excuse for going into a church and executing a bunch of little old black ladies unprovoked. In fact, in such a case, I myself, an “evil neo-Nazi,” would support the death penalty for Dylann Roof.

What differentiates me from Jews and the most visible black activists is that I’m consistent, and can put my own racial agenda aside on genuine questions of justice. I support the death penalty for non-whites who commit similarly egregious crimes as well as whites, while the people on the other side want to let blacks who rape and murder white people to go free.

Corrupt Negro Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who is fanatically pushing for the death penalty for the bowl-cut sporting perpetrator of the June 2015 Charleston attack, embodies this stark hypocrisy. In 2014, Chuck Johnson dug up material of Loretta Lynch publicly stating that she refused to seek the death penalty during her stint as U.S. Attorney from 1999-2001 specifically because she didn’t want any black men to be executed:
As with all establishment talk of “criminal justice reform,” little to nothing is said about why certain races are more likely to be convicted for crimes categorized as worthy of the death penalty. Myopic, low-agency peoples are trained by a corrupt intellectual class to focus only on disparities in outcome, rather than looking at the Federal Governments very own racial statistics on violent crime. The goal is to weigh the scales against whites in order to execute more and pardon more blacks (irrelevant if they’re guilty) for the sake of racial parity. This is a grave injustice caused by the ideological refusal to look at the actual reasons (both genetic and social) for why the average black is dumber, more violent and anti-social than the average white. It’s the same lazy mindset that drives black public school officials to change their students’ grades to match white averages.

Loretta Lynch isn’t the only one who believes our justice system serves as a bully pulpit for those afflicted with racial animosity towards whites, but she is in charge of this case. Either the law applies equally to everyone, or it doesn’t apply to anyone, which is why Dylan Roof’s attorneys–in light of Lynch’s past statements and actions – must open up a racial discrimination lawsuit against the federal government.

Two-Tiered System

The hidden caveat here is that most Jews and blacks think being “racist” (in present discourse, this means whites asserting their right to live or have borders) is a crime worthy of death, even if they don’t have the numbers to fully impose this… yet.

The lynch mob that came out against Brock Turner, a white athlete who was sent to jail for 6 months for drunkenly fingering and making out with another drunk girl, should raise red flags as to what these ludicrous dirtbags have in store. Blacks are far more likely than whites to actually rape someone, and as in the case of Birth of a Nation director Nate Parker, it’s not unusual for skittish Judges and Bronx juries to let them off if the victim is white. The difference is that the media doesn’t put out call to arms against them, because the people in our media think blacks raping whites should be legal (there is no other reasonable explanation).

Cuckold Armed Mob Outside of Brock Turner’s House, notably absent when the criminal is black.

In 2014, there was far more commotion against the death penalty during the case of the Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, whose actions killed six men, women and children, and forever mauled and made disabled hundreds of others in the name of Jihad.

During his trial the principled, if flawed, Aryan Ian Millhiser wrote a collaboration piece with the Jew Zack Beauchamp pleading to spare Tsarnaev’s life.

Three years later, Millhiser, who is genuinely against the death penalty for moral and ethical reasons, has written a similar article asking to avoid the death penalty for Roof.

But somebody’s missing from this 2016 update. Beauchamp has not co-signed the reiteration of the argument against the death penalty. Does he support executing Roof? Beauchamp has written a number of articles decrying Roof’s racism and talking about the latent terrorist threat inside every single white man, but nothing on his capital punishment trial.

There could be some other explanation, but I digress, the majority of people who oppose the death penalty support it against white males or are silent about it, just look at the comments from “liberals” on Buzzfeed. One black religious leader has notably defended Roof, but he’s in the minority and says that he only wants to show Roof mercy because he thinks it sets a precedent for more blacks to be executed.

There’s no doubt Roof’s case is one that should be tried as a capital crime, but the motives behind it are a taste of what is to come if whites ever become the minority in the United States. If Jews give the Loretta Lynch’s of the world even more power over the white population, we’re going to end up in a Mandela-style South African system, where blacks who murder scores of whites for no reason at church are given complete pardons, while whites who defend themselves against a black home invader are arrested, have a tire put over their heads, and are lit on fire.

Better get going on reversing the current demographic decline, because every minute we waste is a minute closer to our races death. Hopefully people left-leaning but more honorable whites like Ian Millhiser will see the light when the people he thought shared his values are actually just motivated by sheer bigotry against whites.

Whoever “God” is, his today the blame.
Yet who but men the Wrath Divine inflame?

Immersed as we all are in the world around us, it is difficult, especially for young people, to realize into what an abnormal condition it has brought itself. Never in all human history has God been so discredited, disbelieved, and in effect discarded from men’s lives. And since all sin is primarily an offence against God, then as men lose all sense of God, so they lose all sense of sin. Therefore men are always right, and “God,” whoever he may be, is always wrong, so that whenever things go wrong “he” can always be brought back long enough to take the blame.

This widely spread attitude makes it virtually impossible to understand the apparent severity of God in the Old Testament, where for instance he commands the Israelites to exterminate whole peoples, as in the book of Joshua. But Catholic Scripture scholars who have not lost their sense of the true and unchanging God, put things back in perspective. Here for instance is a summary of the commentary by a modern Benedictine, Dom Jean de Monléon (1890–1981), on the slaughter of the Canaanites by the Israelites under their leader, Joshua:—

As far as Joshua himself is concerned, he was acting not out of hatred, racism, greed, ambition or whatever, but under strict, precise and repeated orders from God himself. St John Chrysostom says that Joshua might personally have preferred some less murderous solution, but certainly God had his own reasons. These we cannot know for sure, but we can make reasonable guesses. To begin with, all of us human beings, by our original sin (What is that?” cries modern man), have to pay the debt of death, the time, manner and place of which are decided by the Master of Life and Death, who is God. For sinners like the Canaanites, to die sooner rather than later can be a mercy, especially if the manner of death gives them time to repent and so save their souls for eternity.

Next, the Canaanites were indeed sinners, immersed in the committing of terrible crimes, and like mankind before the Flood, like the Sodomites and Gomorrhans, they had made the cup of God’s wrath overflow: prostitution of all kinds, bestiality, incest, witchcraft and in particular, the ritual murder of children, as proved by multiple archaeological excavations in Palestine, whereby tiny skeletons have been uncovered in surroundings clearly identifying them as sacrificial victims, etc.

Moreover if the Canaanites were allowed to survive, they would present a grave danger of corrupting the Israelites, as subsequent history only too clearly showed.

In more recent times, some 400 years ago (but still before the advent of liberalism!), the first missionaries in Canada found themselves bound to conclude that the only way to deal with a certain tribe was to exterminate them. A canonized Saint said, “After repeated experience of their treachery, whether for peace or for the Faith, there is nothing further to be hoped for from them.” (end of Dom Monléon summary)

This still shocks modern susceptibilities, but is it not simply tribal as opposed to individual capital punishment? The principle of capital punishment is that by such anti-social crimes as, for instance, murder, treason, counterfeiting, homosexuality, etc., men are capable of behaving in such a way as to render themselves unfit to live any more in society, and so society’s legitimate authority has the right to take their lives (one may object that not all the individuals in a tribe will be equally guilty, but it should go without saying that Almighty God can and will make all the distinctions necessary).

The problem all comes down to disbelief in the greatness and goodness of God, but let us just say that the Old Testament is neither as cruel nor as out of date as it is often made to appear.

Kyrie eleison.

Although we usually focus on non-white crime, it is important to note that the mental disease of Jewish liberalism also results in many white criminals being set loose.

In this case, white man Christopher Alexander Falconer was found guilty of murder and was released after serving ONLY TEN YEARS. He has now killed again, taking the life of a 19-year-old woman. Any healthy society would have executed Falconer the first time around.

From the Daily Mail:

A convicted murderer who was released after 10 years in prison will spend the rest of his life behind bars after he was found guilty again for murdering a teenager and dumping her body in a shallow grave. 

Christopher Alexander Falconer killed Amber Kirwan, 19, who was last seen alive after leaving Dooly’s pool hall in New Glasgow, Nova Scotia, on October 9, 2011. 

Her remains were found a month later in a shallow grave in Heathbell, Pictou County.

Supreme Court Judge Nick Scaravelli sentenced Falconer, 31, to life in prison with no
chance of parole for 25 years. 

The jury spent seven and a half hours deliberating before reaching a verdict. 

Miss Kirwan’s mother, Marjorie Kirwan, wept as the sentence was read out. 

According to CBC News, crown attorney Bill Gorman said the Kirwan family will never recover from the death of Amber. 

Speaking after the case he said: ‘Their sense of relief, I believe was palpable, this tragedy that I
don’t think they’ll ever get past.

‘Justice was done. The jury carefully and thoughtfully considered. They would have deliberated for the better part of a day and they got our message and they made their finding’.

Miss Kirwan’s body and clothes were found in a shallow grave close to the home of Falconer’s stepsister.

Read More