🇦🇪 Dubai police have launched an investigation into European tourists who mocked and filmed a Muslim couple while they were dining.

The two European tourists involved have been detained. pic.twitter.com/cstL2rjq9y

— BRICS News (@BRICSinfo) January 5, 2025

I saw this video and just thought, “oh well, it’s Dubai, they won’t do anything, they are too obsessed with Western tourist dollars.”

Color me impressed.

Kudos.

Aaj:

Dubai police have arrested a group of female Western tourists for filming and mocking a burqa-clad woman at a restaurant, a video of which has gone viral on social media, sparking outrage.

The incident occurred in a local restaurant where the burqa-clad woman was dining with her husband. The tourists, without seeking permission, filmed the woman and reportedly made fun of her hijab. The video was subsequently shared online.

A foreign news website, citing Dubai police, confirmed the arrests. The police statement emphasized that the tourists violated UAE laws by filming the woman without her consent. The statement further highlighted the UAE’s commitment to respecting all religions, beliefs, and thoughts, stating that criticizing or mocking another person’s culture, civilization, or religion is a crime.

It’s good to see sluts getting their comeuppance.

Hopefully, they will be publicly executed for this.

A really badass sword beheading would be fitting.

Sadly, it’s more likely they’ll just be deported and then praised as heroes when they get back to Europe.

The only real way to stoppen it would be to just not let these people in your country

Yeah, the thing we need to be talking about right now is BURKAS.

That’s getting to the root of the matter.

RT:

Covering your face in public for non-medical reasons will become illegal in Switzerland after a proposal dubbed a “burqa ban” was accepted by a narrow margin of voters in a binding national referendum on Sunday.

Supporters of the “burqa ban” have prevailed in the Alpine country, with 51.2 percent being in favor and 48.8 percent being against, official data showed after votes were counted.

In line with the Swiss system of direct democracy, the country’s constitution will now be amended to forbid face coverings in public places for all but three specific reasons.

The legislation, which had been promoted by the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP) since 2016, did not mention Islam directly and was claimed by proponents to be aimed at preventing violent rioters from hiding their identities. It was nonetheless dubbed the “burqa ban” by the media and politicians due to also restricting the face coverings worn by Muslim women.

Back in 2009, the SVP initiated a referendum on preventing the construction of new minarets in Switzerland, and also won that vote.

There are several exceptions to the “burqa ban” – it allows the covering of one’s face for security, climate, or health reasons. As such, it wouldn’t contradict the anti-coronavirus measures that oblige Swiss citizens to wear face masks in public places, on public transport, and in indoor workspaces. Muslim women would also be allowed to don burqas and niqabs in places of worship.

By greenlighting the ban, Switzerland has joined France, where full-face veils in public were outlawed in 2011, and such countries as Denmark, Austria, the Netherlands and Bulgaria, where full or partial bans on face coverings are currently in place. Two Swiss cantons had already introduced similar restrictions on burqas some years back.

There is an entire list of arguments as to why letting Moslems into your country by the thousands and millions and then banning them from practicing their culture is idiotic.

It’s a bit like when carjackings skyrocketed in Chicago after the BLM anti-police and pro-crime agenda, and instead of saying “well, I guess we have to bring back the cops,” that black guy blamed it on Grand Theft Auto, the video game, and said it should be banned.

Why are they here?

If you’re inviting these people into your country, or Angela Merkel is inviting them and you’re going along with it, then you’re going to have to accept their culture. There is no context in which “please come live in my country – and also sacrifice your most sacred beliefs!” makes any sense.

It is seven times more expensive to bring “refugees” to Europe than to send aid for them in their own countries, according to experts who agree with the immigration agenda. So it is probably more like 70 or 700 times more expensive. There is no reason you would do it unless you wanted to transform your culture and society using these hordes of people.

But here’s the thing.

Look at this:

Referendum committee chairman and SVP member Walter Wobmann blasted Muslim face coverings as “a symbol for this extreme, political Islam, which has become increasingly prominent in Europe and which has no place in Switzerland.” He insisted that showing one’s face was a sign of our “basic freedoms” in the country.

Imagine the levels of cognitive dissonance.

I had to do a quick search and confirm that Switzerland wasn’t some Sweden or Belarus style anti-lockdown, anti-mask country.

It is not.

Here are people getting on a train in Switzerland on July 6, 2020:

Not one of them has the “basic freedom” to show their face.

Honestly, the “burka ban” was always retarded, and always bothered me. It’s like a woman who chooses to date a criminal and then tries to change his behavior. These governments all did this against the popular will. There was no demand for “more Moslems,” nor was there any referendum before the deluge began.

But talking about it now, while the government is enforcing a dictate that says people have to wear something that is shockingly similar to a burka on their face, while going around talking about how people have the freedom to show their faces – this is utterly farcical to the point of almost being incomprehensible.

It’s a little bit difficult to find English news in Switzerland, but thankfully there is The Local, a site which translates most European news into English.

This is their top story today:

The white Swiss are protesting the burka ban while wearing government-mandated face masks which cover the same part of the face as the burka. In fact, if you look closely at the woman in the head scarf, she’s not wearing a burka – she’s wearing a cloth face mask, the exact same as the white Swiss man next to her.

Presumably, the coronavirus face mask meets whatever standards Islamic law prescribes for the burka.

In fact, the woman in the stoppen propaganda appears to be wearing a coronavirus mask.

Notice the way it wraps around her jawline.

(The mask also looks very similar to Sub-Zero’s mask.)

The fact it’s at the top of the local means it is the top story in Switzerland’s own media, generally.

Imagine what is going through the minds of the people?

This politician presumably was wearing a mask when he said that Swiss have the freedom to not cover their faces.

This really is the microcosm not only of the larger situation, but also of the right-wing in white countries.

Banning burkas while you’ve got a mask mandate is like if a man comes into the emergency room with a stab wound and he’s bleeding out and the doctor starts casually examining his acne, then gives him a prescription for anti-acne medication and sends him on his way, as he continues bleeding out.

This is almost a parody of a Guardian article.

Don’t underestimate the role of the burqa ban in turning teenagers into would-be militants

See it here.

It’s is a good illustration of one of the implicit dogmas that underlie the European Genocide: When brown people do bad things, Whitey is always to blame.

The Guardian still seems to be churning out the same old pro-Islam rubbish. It’s notable, however, that the comments are much more resolutely hostile to Islam now than they were even only a few years ago. Most of them are now the kind of things that I, or any visitor to this blog, might say. I just created a new account there to post comments and expected it to be deleted (or placed on the watch status that requires all comments to be pre-approved before they appear) not much later, as most of my other accounts there have been in the past, but now my comments look much like any of the others there so maybe it will last longer.

As judges at the European court of Human Rights have upheld France’s burqa ban, Austrian politician Heinz-Christian Strache posted on a social network an image of a young blonde woman with the phrase “Too beautiful for a veil.”

The campaign was launched by the right-wing Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) leader and Member of Parliament Heinz-Christian Strache on his Facebook page. According to the politician, the poster is aimed “against the Islamization of Europe.”

The image refers to the party’s recent call for a ban on wearing the Muslim burqa in public. Based on the judgement by the European Court of Human Rights, who didn’t oppose the legality of the French burqa ban of 2011, FPÖ plans to introduce the same bill into the Austrian parliament next week.

“In many conservative circles of Islamic immigration society there is a prevailing view that women are second-class citizens,” party spokeswoman Carmen Gartelgruber commented, adding that “one of the many tools of oppression is the burqa.”

A burqa is the full-body veil worn by women according to Islamic traditions, which covers even the eyes with a fine-mesh grid. Another type of veil – the niqab, leaves a slit for the eyes.

The full-body veils, especially burqas, aren’t something you’ll often see on the streets of Austria. Referring to the fact that it’s extremely rare, the planned ban has not been supported by other political forces in Austria.

“One should not create an artificial problem here. I have seen women wearing headscarves in Vienna, but not a burqa. In Austria the number of burqa wearers is estimated at only around one hundred. FPÖ has once again tried to provoke fear and dramatize,” Reinhold Lopatka of the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) told the Wiener Zeitung.

The conservative ÖVP wants to vote against the Freedom Party proposal.

The original image of the blonde girl for the anti-veil campaign could not be found on Strache’s Facebook page on July 4. But the politician posted an image with a Dalai Lama quote in German, saying “if there are too many immigrants, you have to muster up the courage to say it is enough.”

In Switzerland, the citizens of the Italian-speaking canton of Ticino voted with a clear majority to ban full-face veils last September. The parliament in Bern must now consider whether the proposal is consistent with the Swiss Constitution. The Swiss People’s Party (SVP) now also plans to launch a national referendum on a burqa ban next year.

Wherever you have Muslims, you have violence.  In America, we will shortly be experiencing the level of destruction Europe is presently experiencing from these people.  Both Bush and Obama have had clear policies of maximizing all non-White immigration, including from Islamic countries which we are supposed to be at war with.

Fox Seattle reports:

A woman who was nine months pregnant was attacked and rob by two teenagers wearing burqas last Tuesday in North Seattle. Now, police are asking for help finding the attackers.

According to police, the pregnant woman was walking on Nov. 5 near the intersection of Pinehurst Way NE and NE 113th Street when two female teens dressed in all black and wearing burqas approached the woman and asked if they could use her cell phone.

The expectant mother said no, and that she would place the call for them. That’s when the girls, between the ages of 13 and 15, knocked the woman to the ground and tried to rob her before fleeing.

It is unclear if the victim suffered any injuries or needed any medical attention. Police called to the scene and police weren’t able to locate the suspects.

Even before the law was passed banning the burqa, the Workers Force union SGP unit had already sounded the alarm, saying that it would be difficult to enforce.

“We do not have much control if not long ago that it would be wrong. Controls veiled women are a sensitive issue because some fundamentalists trying to set fire to the powder, “says a trade unionist Unsa-police. Law of 11 October 2010 states that “no person may, in the public space, wear clothing intended to conceal his face. ”

During an identity check, the police officer may ask a woman to remove her veil. If it refuses, she is taken to the police to carry out an identity check and be a verbalization. It will then be called by the local court. “This law is difficult to enforce, confirms Nicolas Comte, deputy general secretary of the Workers Force union SGP unit. The number of controlled application of this text people An estimated 700 200 correspond to individuals who wear masks and 500 veiled women. In most cases, everything goes well but when this is not the case, it turns boxing or mini-riot. ”

At Synergy Officer , we are reminded that even before the law was passed the union had already sounded the alarm: “We were told specifically that it would be difficult to enforce market days in Trappes, insists Patrice Ribeiro the Deputy Secretary General. It was prescient! ”

“In some neighborhoods, we observe that groups want to get radical Islam to destabilize the Republic,” adds Christophe Crepin, deputy secretary general of the UNSA-police, which stresses the need “not to confuse between the majority of believers who live quietly and the radical Islamists who are provocations, creating a very serious situation. ”

A view shared by SGP Workers Power Unit, which sums up the situation: “The controls are going wrong when controlled want and they are a militant act ensures Nicolas Comte. Some offenders are also persistent offenders who chose not to apply the law.

According to the police, climbing is often the result of the environment of the woman controlled, as was the case in Trappes. It is the husband who takes the family or people in the street to disrupt control.

Is there then a restraint on the part of police officers, self-censorship not to perform these checks? “Yes, it can happen, said Nicolas Comte Unit GSP working force. But in the same way as in some areas colleagues are sometimes reluctant to verbalize motorists who do not wear their seat or scooter riders who ride without a helmet. The situation can quickly escalate, it is well known that any police intervention is potentially generating riot or assault police. When employees do not feel safe, not realizing control. The problem is that this is exactly what the radicals seek. ”

Synergy officer and present the puzzle faced by the police: “We must not create more trouble than we are responsible for suppressing said Patrice Ribeiro. But the radicals seek to mesmerize the police for there is more control. But it is important not to yield. If we give in on this, we will then give to others. “