Senior Taliban leader Waheedullah Hashimi (center) said Islamic scholars will decide women’s rights.

In the West, women’s rights are decided by emotions.The Taliban won’t make that mistake.

New York Post:

Taliban leadership has announced that women’s rights will be decided by a council of Islamic scholars strictly following sharia law, and there will be no democracy in Afghanistan.

The Islamist militant movement‘s main spokesman claimed Tuesday that women would be allowed to “work and study” and be “very active in society,” even potentially playing a role in government.

But a senior Taliban leader walked back those comments on Wednesday, telling Reuters that the role of women — including their right to work and education and how they should dress — has yet to be decided.

“Our ulema (scholars) will decide whether girls are allowed to go to school or not,” said Waheedullah Hashimi, who has access to the group’s decision-making.

The only “school” a woman needs is her husband.

“They will decide whether they should wear hijab, burqa, or only (a) veil plus abaya or something, or not. That is up to them,” he said of the council.

The decisions will be made with strict adherence to sharia law, the same Islamic rules used during the group’s brutal 1996-2001 rule. Girls were not allowed to go to school and women had to wear all-enveloping burqas to go out, and then only when accompanied by a male relative. They were also banned from working.

It would be nice if they discussed the possibility of banning makeup too.

Moslem women who wear makeup miss the point of the hijab.

Those who broke the rules sometimes suffered humiliation and public beatings by the Taliban’s religious police. There were also numerous reports of rapes and girls being forced into arranged marriages.

“People in Afghanistan, 99.99 percent are Muslims and they believe in Islam,” Hashimi told the wire service.

“When you believe in laws, definitely you should apply that law. We have a council, a very prominent council of Ulema. They will decide what to do.”

Similarly, the exact way the group will govern has yet to be finalized, with that also to follow the same strict religious principles, Hashimi said.

“There will be no democratic system at all because it does not have any base in our country,” he told Reuters.

“We will not discuss what type of political system should we apply in Afghanistan because it is clear. It is sharia law and that is it.”

Taliban supreme leader Haibatullah Akhundzada will likely remain in overall charge and “maybe his deputy will play the role of ‘president’,” Hashimi said, speaking in English.

No democracy is a great choice.

Taliban supreme leader Haibatullah Akhundzada.

Women’s rights should absolutely be decided by religious scholars, because the hierarchy between men and women is a religious matter.

When men give rights to women and view them as equals, they create an illusion where an inferior creature is considered an equal to an undeniably superior one. This, in turn, devaluates the position of the superior creature and results in a domino effect that opens up the door to question God.

Men who enable this “equality” thing also suffer from the womanly drive to undermine authority because they, too, are possessed by female spirits. If they undermine their own authority over women, it’s only a matter of time before they attempt to undermine the authority of God over them.

Women who reject the superiority of men inevitably reject the superiority of God, and men who allow that to happen are complicit.

The only real way to stoppen it would be to just not let these people in your country

Yeah, the thing we need to be talking about right now is BURKAS.

That’s getting to the root of the matter.

RT:

Covering your face in public for non-medical reasons will become illegal in Switzerland after a proposal dubbed a “burqa ban” was accepted by a narrow margin of voters in a binding national referendum on Sunday.

Supporters of the “burqa ban” have prevailed in the Alpine country, with 51.2 percent being in favor and 48.8 percent being against, official data showed after votes were counted.

In line with the Swiss system of direct democracy, the country’s constitution will now be amended to forbid face coverings in public places for all but three specific reasons.

The legislation, which had been promoted by the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP) since 2016, did not mention Islam directly and was claimed by proponents to be aimed at preventing violent rioters from hiding their identities. It was nonetheless dubbed the “burqa ban” by the media and politicians due to also restricting the face coverings worn by Muslim women.

Back in 2009, the SVP initiated a referendum on preventing the construction of new minarets in Switzerland, and also won that vote.

There are several exceptions to the “burqa ban” – it allows the covering of one’s face for security, climate, or health reasons. As such, it wouldn’t contradict the anti-coronavirus measures that oblige Swiss citizens to wear face masks in public places, on public transport, and in indoor workspaces. Muslim women would also be allowed to don burqas and niqabs in places of worship.

By greenlighting the ban, Switzerland has joined France, where full-face veils in public were outlawed in 2011, and such countries as Denmark, Austria, the Netherlands and Bulgaria, where full or partial bans on face coverings are currently in place. Two Swiss cantons had already introduced similar restrictions on burqas some years back.

There is an entire list of arguments as to why letting Moslems into your country by the thousands and millions and then banning them from practicing their culture is idiotic.

It’s a bit like when carjackings skyrocketed in Chicago after the BLM anti-police and pro-crime agenda, and instead of saying “well, I guess we have to bring back the cops,” that black guy blamed it on Grand Theft Auto, the video game, and said it should be banned.

Why are they here?

If you’re inviting these people into your country, or Angela Merkel is inviting them and you’re going along with it, then you’re going to have to accept their culture. There is no context in which “please come live in my country – and also sacrifice your most sacred beliefs!” makes any sense.

It is seven times more expensive to bring “refugees” to Europe than to send aid for them in their own countries, according to experts who agree with the immigration agenda. So it is probably more like 70 or 700 times more expensive. There is no reason you would do it unless you wanted to transform your culture and society using these hordes of people.

But here’s the thing.

Look at this:

Referendum committee chairman and SVP member Walter Wobmann blasted Muslim face coverings as “a symbol for this extreme, political Islam, which has become increasingly prominent in Europe and which has no place in Switzerland.” He insisted that showing one’s face was a sign of our “basic freedoms” in the country.

Imagine the levels of cognitive dissonance.

I had to do a quick search and confirm that Switzerland wasn’t some Sweden or Belarus style anti-lockdown, anti-mask country.

It is not.

Here are people getting on a train in Switzerland on July 6, 2020:

Not one of them has the “basic freedom” to show their face.

Honestly, the “burka ban” was always retarded, and always bothered me. It’s like a woman who chooses to date a criminal and then tries to change his behavior. These governments all did this against the popular will. There was no demand for “more Moslems,” nor was there any referendum before the deluge began.

But talking about it now, while the government is enforcing a dictate that says people have to wear something that is shockingly similar to a burka on their face, while going around talking about how people have the freedom to show their faces – this is utterly farcical to the point of almost being incomprehensible.

It’s a little bit difficult to find English news in Switzerland, but thankfully there is The Local, a site which translates most European news into English.

This is their top story today:

The white Swiss are protesting the burka ban while wearing government-mandated face masks which cover the same part of the face as the burka. In fact, if you look closely at the woman in the head scarf, she’s not wearing a burka – she’s wearing a cloth face mask, the exact same as the white Swiss man next to her.

Presumably, the coronavirus face mask meets whatever standards Islamic law prescribes for the burka.

In fact, the woman in the stoppen propaganda appears to be wearing a coronavirus mask.

Notice the way it wraps around her jawline.

(The mask also looks very similar to Sub-Zero’s mask.)

The fact it’s at the top of the local means it is the top story in Switzerland’s own media, generally.

Imagine what is going through the minds of the people?

This politician presumably was wearing a mask when he said that Swiss have the freedom to not cover their faces.

This really is the microcosm not only of the larger situation, but also of the right-wing in white countries.

Banning burkas while you’ve got a mask mandate is like if a man comes into the emergency room with a stab wound and he’s bleeding out and the doctor starts casually examining his acne, then gives him a prescription for anti-acne medication and sends him on his way, as he continues bleeding out.

Jetzt hat das Verschleierungsverbot auch das Lego Männchen erwischt. pic.twitter.com/S1b0p5j573

— Mevlüt Kücükyasar (@MevluetK) October 20, 2017

Just as “diversity” is destroying Halloween, it is destroying fun for children (and adults) just in general.

RT:

Officers flocked to a Lego store in Vienna responding to a report of a violation of the law forbidding full face veils. Over the past days, it also had police approaching a man in a shark suit and the Austrian parliament’s mascot.

The incident in the Austrian capital happened on Friday after law enforcement received an anonymous complaint that the law in question had been violated in the store. The officers responded to the call, only to find out that the apparent “criminal” was a woman dressed in a costume of a Red Ninja. She was not issued a fine, though; police said they established she concealed her face as part of her “professional occupation.”

This is Moslems calling these in to try and get back at whitey for banning their alleged culture.

The incident – the like of which risks becoming a commonplace in Austria – came after the country’s parliament backed a law banning people from covering their faces in public.

The law was part of a wider legislation – approved earlier in May – that enables compulsory integration of foreigners and encourages immigrants to engage in unpaid public work before getting a work permit. The so-called “burqa ban” – although not described as such in the legislation – had already led to a chain of bizarre incidents that left many in Austria scratching their heads.

Earlier in October, the Austrian parliament’s official mascot Lesko drew officers’ attention. A man wearing the rabbit suit was prevented from posing for children shooting videos during an open-door event ahead of Austria’s Independence Day, Kurier reported.

You see – children are not allowed to have joy in a multicultural system.

Another ludicrous encounter occurred in Vienna when a promoter dressed as a shark to advertise a new McShark electronics store was fined €150 ($176) after he refused to take off his shark head, Deutsche Welle reported.

Interestingly, police have argued against the law themselves. “It is unenforceable. The law was not written as a burqa ban for constitutional reasons and now this rubbish is unfolding,” Hermann Greylinger, the head of the Austrian police union, told OE24 TV channel.

Yeah – it is anti-democratic to simply ban the burka, so you have to ban fun for children along with it.

This is insane.

We just need to send these people home, so we can have our countries back.

Why should we be forced to deal with this?

What are we getting out of it, other than misery and taxes?

The apparent reason why we have to suffer like this is because our ancestors allegedly historically abused Moslems.

Well, what about the abuses they inflicted on us?

They have conquered most of Europe before, during which period they sold our women into slavery.

Is anyone saying we should be able to move to Islamic countries and live on welfare and destroy their society with outrageous demands and violence because of this historical reality?

Of course not.

Because none of this is actually about magically rectifying historic wrongs (something which is not possible) – it is simply about harming white people.

According to the prophet (PBUH) statues are haram, after all.

We told you you had a choice: WHITE SHARIA or sandpeople sharia.

We weren’t kidding.

And the authorities at Charlottesville have made that choice, now.

They chose sand sharia.

What will you choose?

Fox News:

Workers in Charlottesville, Va. shrouded statues of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee and Gen. Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson in black on Wednesday as the city grappled with an outbreak of deadly violence at a white nationalist rally earlier this month.

We won’t destroy your historical heritage, goyim. We’ll just put a classy garbage bag around it. For now.

Workers used ropes, poles and cherry-pickers to hoist what appeared to be a black tarpaulin over both statues as onlookers took photos and video. Some in the crowd surrounding the Lee statue cheered as the cover was put in place.

Hmm, I wonder what kind of human material would cheer at Western historical symbols being symbolically put into the trash?

I bet it was the straight White males again.

“It’s great. It’s a good start,” said Jamie Dyer, who spoke from Justice Park, where the Jackson statue is located. “They do have to go, but it is a start, and I’m glad the city has finally recognized it has to happen on some level.”

The statues “have to go,” presumably because it’s 2017 or whatever. The passage of time is, after all, the liberal’s first and foremost argument for why we should follow their vicious agenda, in spite of whatever costs might be associated with that.

Later Wednesday, local media reported that a man with a gun strapped to his leg approached the Lee statue and began cutting the tarp with a knife.

Police asked him to stop, and he complied. He addressed reporters and bystanders, saying he thought it was illegal under state law to cover a war memorial and that doing so amounted to erasing history.

The police stopped this man from unveiling an ancient historical monument. But they didn’t do anything while rioters destroyed a monument to confederate soldiers.

They needed “space to destroy,” after all.

Charlottesville is entirely run under the Jewish principle of destroying White civilization. As such, anything which hurts White people will be tolerated or even encouraged, while all resistance will be stamped down ruthlessly.

This is what happens when you have a Jewish mayor and Black vice-mayor.

Now that’s what I call tolerance. Turn on subtitles to understand what he’s saying.

Did you think you understood the full meaning of diversity?

Think again.

Things are about to get kicked up a notch!

Breitbart:

Austria’s far-left president, Alexander Van der Bellen, has suggested that one day all women must wear headscarves to fight Islamophobia.

During a talk to students, Van der Bellen said that whilst be believes a woman should wear “whatever she wants”, should Austria’s “rampant Islamophobia continue, there will come a day when we must ask all women to wear a headscarf – all of them! – out of solidarity towards those who do it for religious reasons”.

Van der Bellen, who was sworn in as president in January after defeating anti-mass migration Freedom Party candidate Norbert Hofer in last December’s presidential re-run, has spoken of his support for abolishing national borders and creating a federal Europe, describing it as a “project of peace”.

A “project of peace” requires the “religion of peace,” of course. Barbaric Europeans could never accept living in a peaceful, border-free Europe.

Europe will not be at peace until it is Islamic.

Whilst running on an election platform in 2007 for the Austrian Greens, Van der Bellen presided over a poster that declared: “Anyone who loves Austria must be shit.”

In democracy, the people are blessed with leaders who express open hatred against their own country. Isn’t that wonderful?

However, the Austrian president has little influence over Austrian policy, with his role as president mainly symbolic and ceremonial.

His comments run against recent legislation passed by the Austrian government, who last month banned the full-face Islamic veil, known as the burqa, in public places as part of a new integration package.

Yeah, we’ve got a war between the integrationists and the assimilationists. Or whatever you want to call it.

People are disagreeing about whether or not we should let the population that is replacing us keep their culture, or try to force them to adopt tranny-based Western Jewish culture. What both sides agree on is that white people have to be completely removed from Europe.

Additional commentary from Andrew Anglin.

The burka is a tribal, racial symbol.

This has nothing to do with women’s rights, on either side. Even the whites who seek to ban the burka don’t do it because they care about the rights of the women, or for security reasons – they do it because it is a symbol of open racial hostility when these women wear this bag in public in a western country.

Of course, anyone who thinks banning the burka does anything is an assimilationist, who thinks that if we force these people to abandon their racial symbols, they’ll adapt to our society. Which is wrong.

At the same time, I support anything that agitates these monkeys.

RT:

Some 3,000 Muslim women and their supporters marched in Vienna protesting government plans to impose ban on wearing full-face veils in public places.

The protest in front of Austria’s Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs was staged on Saturday by the Network Muslim Civil Society (NMZ) organization in cooperation with some other Muslim associations.

The protesters marched under slogan “MuslimBanAustria: My body – My right of self-determination!” claiming that the full-face veil is an instrument of women “self-empowerment.”

The burka is a symbol of female self-empowerment.

That really is the cutest liberal argument yet.

It’s my personal favorite.

Obviously, the purpose of the burka is the opposite – it is to ensure women don’t have any power in society. Because let’s be honest, fam – the only potential power a woman has is her body. Women are not smart or intellectual, and they are not physically strong, and all things being equal, they aren’t going to have a lot of their own money.

So literally, the only power that a woman has is sex power, and the purpose of the burka is to negate that power.

They do this because unlike idiot whites, Moslems are aware that giving even a little bit of power to women will plant the seed for the collapse of your society.

Moslems may be dumb, but they’re not stupid.

Before the march started, one of organizers ordered the male supporters to go into the end of the procession, since it was a “women event.”

“Since we’re marching forward as a women’s block: we first!” she said.

The protesters carried various placards, many of which were in English presumably to appeal to international audience. Some of them read “Against racism & sexism,” “Islamophobia is not freedom” and “Hijab is a personal experience.”

The crowd chanted “We are here and we are loud, because you steal our freedom!” and “Hey, minister! Hands off my sister!”

Some of the non-Muslim protesters said that they attended the event out of solidarity to resist the “rise of Donald Trump” which, according to them, constitutes the triumph of “anti-Muslim racism” and endangers all the gains of the feminist movement.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Austria’s ruling coalition announced plans to ban all Muslim face veils in public places, which came as a part of the new “integration law” on Monday. The measures are expected to be implemented before the next parliamentary elections in 2018.

“We believe in an open society that is also based on open communication. Full-body veils in public spaces stand against that and will therefore be prohibited,” text of the plan read.

Yeah, well.

Good luck with that.

Who knows. Maybe you’ll be the first society ever – after a thousand and a half years – to successfully integrate Moslems.

Could be.

15:22: Burgtheater: VIDEO: #MuslimBan #muslimbanAustria pic.twitter.com/Ws7CP9H0eG

— Esterreicherr (@Esterreicherr) February 4, 2017

Are these racist goyim implying they wouldn’t want a burka-wearing queen?

While the left is engaging in limp-wristed attempts at Nazi-shaming the population of Austria in preparation for the upcoming election, our right-wing activists are engaging in ballsy displays of intolerance.

Good on them.

RT:

A statue of the 18th-century queen Maria Theresa in Vienna has been covered with a huge burka. The Muslim veil was placed over the statue, one of the city’s most famous monuments, by a far-right group in protest against “the Islamization of Austria.”

The Identitarian youth movement chose to cover the statue of Maria Theresa, one of the country’s most respected historical figures, in a large public square in central Vienna, not far from the parliament building.

A sign reading “Islamization? No thanks!” was placed by the statue.

They can wear their garbage bags in their own country.

During her 40-year reign in the 18th century, the female monarch was a devout Catholic, intolerant of other religions. The anniversary of her death was marked this week.

“We are fighting for the legacy of Maria Theresa, for the preservation of our traditions and for the freedom of our women,” the group said in a statement posted on its Facebook page.

I hope those traditions involve women having kids and staying in the kitchen though, guys.

We don’t need more of this “Islam is evil because they oppress fags and women” nonsense.

Still, though – epic trell.

Having brought special equipment to reach the head of the huge statue, activists said they were working “day and night” to warn of the “threat of Islamization” in Europe.

It looks like the “far-right” is set to win this election. The polls are definitely in their favor.

The election is this Sunday, the fourth of December.

Hang on to your hats, boys.

The burka ban is a weak measure.

On one hand, it is negative, because it promotes the idea that you can somehow assimilate these “people” if you just force them to disregard their own culture. On the other hand, it makes them angry in a hilarious way.

On the third hand, it is better not to have to look at these women’s disgusting weasel faces.

Overall, I think it’s stupid.

RT:

The lower house of the Dutch parliament has voted in favor of banning face veils and other face covering garments in certain public places such as schools, hospitals or government buildings, citing security concerns.

The bill envisages a ban on Islamic veils and robes such as the burqa and niqab but also applies to all face coverings, including ski masks, helmets and balaclavas. It does not cover such situations as wearing burqas on the streets but applies only to specific situations, in which face recognition and proper communication are “essential.”

Those defying the ban would face a fine amounting to up to €410 ($430). Wearing face covering garments for protection or during sports activities or festivals and cultural events is exempted from the ban.

Basically, the reason they pass these measures is to attempt to quell the dissenting population that is becoming increasingly angry about the Moslem flood. It’s just a “see, we’re doing something” type measure.

At least France banned it on the street. Banning it only in public buildings is totally meaningless.

FRANCE DELIVERS!

Huffington Post:

The final solution to non-stop mass murder is to change the dress code.

I have long viewed burka bans as the epitome of cuckservative faggotry. These proposals pander to the idea that because race doesn’t exist, Moslems will all of the sudden stop being Moslems if you just bully them by denying them their culture.

France banned the burka a long time ago, and it has simply incited the haji population into further violence.

The solution to Islam is to ban Moslems, not to try and trick them into cultural assimilation.

Beside, presenting the burka ban as a measure against terrorism is ridiculous on the face of it, because most terrorism isn’t committed by women and I don’t think any of it is committed by women in burkas.

This is just a last ditch effort of the genocidal maniacs of the Christian Democrat Party (Merkel’s party, also the party of de Miziere, who is making the proposal) to seem like reasonable people.

BBC:

Germany’s interior minister will back plans to ban the burka as part of a raft of anti-terror measures, local media say.

Thomas de Maiziere also proposes deporting criminals more quickly and relaxing doctor confidentiality rules.

He is due to announce some ideas on Thursday, and back some ideas from ministers in his party next week.

There have been repeated attacks in German cities recently, some of them related to Islamist terror.

In July, an axe-wielding teenager from Afghanistan injured five people on a train in Wuerzburg before he was shot dead by police.

The same month, a failed asylum seeker from Syria killed himself and injured 15 people when he set off a bomb outside a music festival in Ansbach.

Both attacks were claimed by the so-called Islamic State group.

The burka is a strict Muslim veil for women that covers the full head and body. Not many people in Germany wear it.

Yeah, see – no one even wears it.

I see video of the newly Islamized streets of Berlin, and you don’t see it. Most of the Moslems are men anyway.

This is just goofy fluff.

The country has very few restrictions on people’s dress. A committee of the government issued a report in 2012 saying it would be unconstitutional to ban the full burka or the niqab facial veil.

But there are some exceptions. For instance, it is illegal to cover your face in a football stadium in Germany.

Burka bans exist in other parts of Europe, notably France, Belgium and some towns in Italy.

The rest of the propositions are just as feeble.

The ministers propose:

• banning the burka
• stopping German people from being allowed to hold dual nationality
• recruiting 15,000 more police officers by 2020
• posting more police on trains and in transport hubs
• making it more difficult for extremist organisations to finance mosques
• deporting foreign hate preachers

The police state measures are the only ones that even follow logically, as the rest of it will obviously only serve to make the hajis angrier. But as we’ve seen in France, martial law doesn’t prevent terrorism.

The only thing that prevents terrorism is removing kebab.

Coincidentally, this will also prevent mental health-related mass murders, as well as people mass-murdering because of Anders Breivik.