The “teacher” is a woman, obviously

The biggest problem with Britishness is whiteness.

Whiteness is a virus that has to be stamped out and it can only be truly destroyed when it no longer has any bodies to inhabit.

Breitbart:

Primary school children in England have reportedly been asked by the National Trust to write poems “denigrating” the British Empire, as campaigners attempt to convince the heritage charity to abandon its increasingly woke agenda.

A group of 100 children were led by controversial left-wing professor Corinne Fowler, of Leicester University, on a tour of country houses in order to inspire them to write poems chastising the former owners for their connections to colonialism, according to The Times.

Fowler is 40ish and fat. But she’s beautiful.

If you say she’s not beautiful, we’re gonna have a big problem.

Prof Fowler defended the initiative — which is part of the Colonial Countryside Project that has listed Sir Winston Churchill’s home on a BLM-style shame list — telling The Times: “Colonial Countryside pupils produced work which expresses the fullest possible range of approaches, perspectives and emotions, from critical to curious to expressions of wonder.”

In response to seeing a dress sword at Charlecote Park near Stratford-upon-Avon, recovered during the Siege of Lucknow in 1857 amid the Indian rebellion, one student wrote: “Stolen by the English; a freedom sword, a stolen freedom sword.”

The children were said to have been saddened about the animal decorations on the walls of some of the homes, with Trust employees telling the youngsters that elephants were used “in order to display power in ways which Indians would recognise”.

The Trust’s Colonial Countryside Project has previously come under fire after it was revealed that primary school-aged children were used to “reverse mentor” National Trust staff on the alleged evils of British colonialism.

The woke push from the heritage body has sparked an internal backlash, with National Trust members establishing a pressure group, Restore Trust, in order to stand up for British history against the Black Lives Matter iconoclasm sweeping through the charity.

Jack Hayward of Restore Trust said: “We don’t have a problem with an objective assessment of history. We have a problem with people being subjective about history.”

…

The campaigners are attempting to restore “the Trust’s original apolitical ethos” in order to “make all visitors feel welcome and included without demonising anyone’s history or heritage” and “to use history responsibly as a tool for understanding, not as a weapon”.

Whites used everything as a weapon.

Even elephant symbols.

Now it’s time for us to use history as a weapon against whiteness, the real virus of our times.

It’s time to recognize, as Michelle Codrington-Rogers, says of blacks: “We built the pyramids, developed modern numbers, built universities. Our ancestors were philosophers, scientists, military strategists, authors, writers, activists and so much more.”

It doesn’t matter if that’s true or not.

Thousands of years ago, blacks would have built pyramids and invented numbers if it wasn’t for racism.

History should be about equity, and in order to do equity, we must rewrite history so that blacks did everything.

This is not about fairness or equality anymore – those are both white colonial CIS patriarchal racist ideas.

There’s a big difference between equality and equity. pic.twitter.com/n3XfQyjLNe

— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) November 1, 2020

The BBC’s headline is that women are just being forced to show their vaginas against their will for no reason.

But you will find that the true story is much less sympathetic.

Also: who died and made you Jesus, BBC? Where do you get the right to tell anyone how to live?

BBC:

India’s uncomfortable relationship with periods is back in the headlines.

College students living in a hostel in the western Indian state of Gujarat have complained that they were made to strip and show their underwear to female teachers to prove that they were not menstruating.

The 68 young women were pulled out of classrooms and taken to the toilet, where they were asked to individually remove their knickers for inspection.

The incident took place in the city of Bhuj on Tuesday. The young women are undergraduate students at Shree Sahajanand Girls Institute (SSGI), which is run by Swaminarayan sect, a wealthy and conservative Hindu religious group.

They said a hostel official had complained to the college principal on Monday that some of the students were breaking rules menstruating women are supposed to follow.

According to these rules, women are barred from entering the temple and the kitchen and are not allowed to touch other students during their periods.

At meal times, they have to sit away from others, they have to clean their own dishes, and in the classroom, they are expected to sit on the last bench.

One of the students told BBC Gujarati’s Prashant Gupta that the hostel maintains a register where they are expected to enter their names when they get their periods, which helps the authorities to identify them.

But for the past two months, not one student had entered her name in the register – perhaps not surprising considering the restrictions they have to put up with if they do.

So on Monday, the hostel official complained to the principal that menstruating students were entering the kitchen, going near the temple, and mingling with other hostellers.

The students allege that, the next day, they were abused by the hostel official and the principal before they were forced to strip.

They described what happened to them as a “very painful experience” that had left them “traumatised” and amounted to “mental torture”.

…

Some of the students told BBC Gujarati that they are now under pressure from the school authorities to play down the incident and not to speak of their ordeal.

See: no one had entered their name in the book in two months. And unless they are anorexic or on a Western-style drug cocktail that is not available in India, every single one of them had had their period in the last two months.

So every single one of them was in violation of the rules.

But the BBC thinks they have a right to meddle in Indian cultural affairs and demand all of these changes. They are claiming that they have anonymous sources who say the school is engaging in a conspiracy – is that even true? No one will ever know.

The rules are quite reasonable, by any historical standard. Historically, no society would give menstruating women the same rights as non-menstruating women, and most societies required them to stay isolated completely, as in, inside of their homes.

Women who are menstruating are a known threat to society, and letting them loose is dumb and insane.

What is also dumb and insane is the Western obsession with forcing all of these primitive societies to go along with their kooky Jewish agenda. Okay, Britain. You’ve adopted feminism. We all get it.

But no one in India is trying to bully you into going back to a sane system of running your country, so why are you meddling in India and trying to force them to adopt your ridiculous modern conception of the nature of the human being?

Who gave you this right?

When Christian missionaries went around the world to try to save the savages, they at least had the excuse that God was on their side.

Who is on the side of missionaries of the new order of gay feminist revolution?

Science? 

Firstly, science is not a higher authority, and secondly, science is not a period denialist.

Science also does not agree that “anal sex is healthy and natural,” or with really any of your other positions.

So from whence does the authority to force yourself on others emerge?

From Satan? 

How is it that we are told that colonialism in India was evil, but we are also told that it is perfectly fine for the BBC to attempt to force widescale social changes on India?

No British colonialist tried to force widespread social changes on India. All they did was build buildings and roads and set up shipping lines. They provided education that taught children things about the British way of doing things, but they didn’t force anyone to be involved in the education against their will.

How is anyone on earth capable of reconciling the idea that British India was bad but BBC-Regulated Indian Menstruation Regimes are good?

No one can believe that. This is all just an absurd hoax.

It’s election day, Brits.

Get out there and VOTE LABOUR for a chance at a JUDENFREI FUTURE.

You can go read the article if you want, but I’m most concerned about the headline itself.

The article is actually just Jew White guilt. The “breast tax” was an ancient Hindu tradition – charging low-caste women money to wear a garment that covered their breasts. The article makes it sound like this was implemented by the British colonial government, when in fact they were the ones who abolished it.

Just as they abolished savage monkeyism all across the brown world – though most of it was reinstated when they left.

Anyhoo. I had forgotten about this woman who chopped her own tits off in protest. It’s actually not very well documented that it even happened, and is probably made up.

This is an interesting interview with a British man called Gerald Green, who was a Policeman in Palestine in the months leading up to when the Jews took over.

He talks about the Jewish terrorist gangs and how 95% of the British Police sympathised greatly with the what was happening to the Arabs. Also about how he feared that his commander had been bribed by the Jews to get the Police not to intervene.

Palestine was not a British colony, but was called a British mandate, after the League of Nations decided Britain should be responsible for it.

He also explains how White nations built the infrastructure up in these less advanced countries after the great war.

Somewhat shockingly, a new poll shows that the majority of Brits believe that the British Empire is something they should be proud of, and half said that colonized nations are better off than they were before being colonized.

YouGov:

Among the British public, feelings tend to be positive. A new YouGov survey finds that most think the British Empire is more something to be proud of (59%) rather than ashamed of (19%). 23% don’t know. Young people are least likely to feel pride over shame when it comes to the Empire, though about half (48%) of 18-24 year olds do. In comparison, about two-thirds (65%) of over 60s feel mostly proud.

…

Though many (36%) are unsure, British people do tend to think that, overall, former British colonies are now better off for having been part of the empire, by 49-15%.

A third of British people (34%) also say they would like it if Britain still had an empire. Under half (45%) say they would not like the Empire to exist today. 20% don’t know.

I’m not surprised many would be unsure about the colonized nations being better off now – it is the liberal catch 22. They tell us that colonization was horrible, then they tell us that the most important thing for these people is to act like Whites.

Given the crumbling demographics of Britain, with everyone from Negroes to Pakistanis to Mexicans being called “British,” results are sometimes hard to gauge.  I imagine that it would be mostly Whites that would say that the British Empire is something to be proud of, while the Hindu/Paki population might be prone to admitting that their hellhole is better now than in was before the British brought them civilization.

Whatever the exact numbers, it is fantastic to hear that the British people are willing to voice pride in the monumental accomplishments of their ancestors, even while the Jewish establishment has gone to such ends to attempt to defame our history, to claim that our victories were failures so they can tell us our present failure is victory.

Our numbers are growing, while even the masses begin to shift our way.

The future is ours, if we are willing to take it.  The Anglo Empire may yet rise again.

When is an apology not an apology? When it is the British government offering “deep regret” for the supposed misdeeds of its imperial forefathers. The latest mea culpa comes from Prime Minister David Cameron who has apologised to the Sikh community for Britain’s supposed role during the massacre at their holiest shrine, the Golden Temple in Amritsar during a hostage crisis in 1985.

This came as a surprise to everyone, including most Sikhs, who were unaware of any British involvement when the Indian army raided the temple during the clashes which took place nearly forty years after Indian independence.

But Prime Minister Cameron has insisted that yes indeed there is something to apologise over. His civil servants had been rooting through the archives and had come up with something suitably incriminating. It turns out that a single British officer was dispatched to the scene at the time of the stand-off and his advice was ignored. So that was the extent of our “colonial interference” on that occasion. Cue fulsome apology.

And for good measure David Cameron became the first British Prime Minister to visit the scene of the previous Amritsar massacre in 1919 as depicted in the Oscar-winning film Gandhi. Cameron says he stopped short of delivering a formal British apology but nevertheless expressed “deep regret” for Britain’s role.

Both incidents are small beer compared to many other atrocities that have happened throughout the sub- continent’s history not least during partition in 1948. Nevertheless there is a lot of political advantages to be gained from such empty gestures . The Conservative Party will be fighting many UK seats where there are huge Sikh communities at the next election and will get a lot of political credit. The pictures of Cameron in a turban won’t have done any harm either.

It was Cameron’s predecessor Tony Blair who pioneered the art of the strategic non-apology apology. Shortly after becoming Prime Minister in 1997 he apologised for Britain’s role in the 1840’s Irish potato famine. Then he prostrated himself before Britain’s multicultural industrial complex by apologising for our role in the slave trade.

There are a number of problems with this. First, it involves a certain amount of re-writing of history or at least skipping over inconvenient facts — mainly that slavery has been universal since humans could walk upright and that Black Africans and Arab traders were at least as responsible for this practice long before and after the Atlantic slave trade.

It also means overlooking the fact that Britain was the first country in history to abolish the slave trade and that the Royal Navy did a great deal to stamp it out on the seas elsewhere. But to dismiss these apologies as supreme exercises in fatuousness is to miss the point.

The value of such posturing is in creating a culture of shame and dishonour over Britain’s colonial past in order to make the British Empire as disreputable as the Third Reich.

In other words, they are an essential part of the cultural and moral revolution that has been taking place in Britain since the election of Tony Blair in 1997. In helping to dismantle Britain’s past and destroy the name of the men who built it and who fought to defend it, we are helping to build our post-nation-state multicultural borderless future.

In a culture where power flows from victimhood, such empty gestures assume great totemic potency. But there is also a deeper purpose. Continual self-flagellation over the sins of the past is seen as having a necessary therapeutic function in purging society of any lingering trace of unhelpful traditional attitudes. This is all easy to laugh at but is taken very seriously in classrooms, town halls and media such as the BBC.

Labour’s innovation of pointless apologies has been enthusiastically adopted by our present Conservative government. The gay community will doubtless have been delighted that a posthumous pardon and apology was issued in 2009 for Alan Turing, the genius mathematician and World War II codebreaker who was convicted of gross indecency in 1952 when homosexuality was still illegal.

And more recently Prince William, the heir to the throne but one, has announced his intention of doing away with the Royal Ivory Collection which was collected by sovereigns over the centuries and contains such treasures as a Maharajah’s throne and Royal duelling sword. An apology to deceased elephants will doubtless follow.

Last June Britain announced that surviving Kenyans tortured by British colonial forces during the Mau Mau uprising in the fifties, will receive payouts totalling £20m, Foreign Secretary William Hague also announced that Britain would fund a monument to victims of British torture in Nairobi.

He said the UK government recognised Kenyans were tortured and “sincerely regrets” the abuses that took place. It was an announcement that warmed the hearts of lawyers in Britain’s booming personal injury industry who will no doubt be in receipt of most of the money.

Thousands of people were killed during the Mau Mau revolt against British rule in Kenya in the 1950s, many of them black Africans themselves. There is however no word of compensation for them

Predictably it is all about pushing diversity. In the anniversary commemorations for the Great War the British government are planning to downplay the role of White soldiers from Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. More than 80,000 Anzac soldiers died between 1914–1918 fighting for the British Empire in theatres of war as far apart as the Somme and the Dardanelles.

But according to News.com.au, British government sources have confirmed in internal briefings that Australia and New Zealand will not be mentioned even once during the commemorations. Instead the contribution of soldiers from countries such as Nigeria, Pakistan, India and elsewhere will play to a “community cohesion” agenda within the UK even if means artificially inflating their actual roles. The Indian Army served on many theatres of war, especially in southeast Asia, mainly in support roles but its record was heavily tarnished by its unfortunate habit — like many mercenary armies — of going over to the enemy. This happened in both world wars.

In the Mesopotamian campaign in 1915 Indian Army soldiers switched sides and joined the Turks. After the fall of Singapore, many Indian Army servicemen agreed to join their Japanese captors and man POW camps incarcerating their former comrades in arms. Many even took up arms against the Allies.

Most notoriously the Free Indian Legion was recruited by Himmler from captured Indian soldiers in the North African campaign of 1941. Thousands served with “great distinction” in Normandy and were drafted into the Waffen S.S. whom they fought alongside until the fall of Berlin.

So what of the other players in Britain’s imperial story who might merit an apology. What about the thousands sent overseas during the Highland Clearances or the convicts deported to Australia. And what about the thousands of Afrikaans women and children who died of neglect and disease in General Kitchener’s concentration camps during the Boer wars? Are they to be forgotten because they are the wrong colour?

What is increasingly clear is the only calculation that matters is not what was done but who gains political advantage and making sure the gods of diversity are appeased.

As usual George Orwell had a quote that seems appropriate. “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.”