The patriarchy is on its last legs.

Canadian women are going to do total immigration, total war, and total anus.

Democracy rises.

CBC:

British Columbia has elected its first ever majority-female legislature, with 49 MLAs identifying as women following the 2024 election.

They represent 52.7 per cent of the 93-seat house, with 31 female MLAs from the B.C. NDP and 18 from the B.C. Conservatives.

It’s the first time that’s happened at the provincial or federal level in Canadian history, according to advocacy organization Equal Voice.

The legislature of the Northwest Territories became the first in Canada to have a majority of female members after a byelection in 2021. The majority swung back to men after the 2023 territorial election.

Federally, female MPs make up 31 per cent of the House of Commons, according to Statistics Canada.

News of the majority-female legislature has drawn praise from an advocate and a former cabinet minister, who both said they hoped the policies that result will be more representative of the population at large.

“I think you’re seeing now that people are less likely to evaluate whether a candidate is a man or a woman and simply ask themselves, ‘Are they a good candidate?’ And that’s a real positive thing,” said Mary Polak, who held several ministerial posts with the B.C. Liberals.

…

Chi Nguyen, the executive director at Equal Voice, said that having a legislature that is representative of the province’s population could lead to a different working culture on the floor of the house.

“We do know that, you know, when we have a diversity of thinking and lots of different opinions around the table that we tend to see different kinds of policy outcomes come forward,” she said.

Why is this a Vietnamese woman?

What is going on in Canada?

Canada’s been hitting all sorts of negative records lately

Damn.

I thought this would work.

The Publica:

British Columbia is throwing in the towel on its drug decriminalization experiment just 15 months after it began. The province’s premier is pleading with the Canadian federal government to urgently recriminalize drugs — hoping the move will put an end to a spate of chaos and violence in public (including inside of hospitals) and skyrocketing overdose deaths.

Premier David Eby first decriminalized possession of upwards of 2.5 grams of illicit substances —including fentanyl, crack cocaine, and methamphetamine — in January of 2023. Eby’s far-left New Democratic Party (NDP) hailed the move as a major win for “harm reduction” and claimed that it would reduce the stigmatization of drug users. They argued that destigmatizing drug use would prompt addicts to seek treatment and lower overdose deaths. They were wrong.

Over the past 15 months, the province has seen skyrocketing drug use in public, including in restaurants, on playgrounds, and even in hospitals. Several small businesses closed because of growing crime and break-ins.

On Instagram, Safe Streets Vancouver, a self-described group of “concerned residents” took to documenting the public chaos.

During the high-risk trial, numerous frontline healthcare workers went to their unions and the media to complain about unsafe work environments in the wake of Eby’s decriminalization.

A leaked hospital memo from northern British Columbia (BC) revealed that nurses were told to not prevent patients from accessing drugs, and not to confiscate weapons or prevent drug dealers from visiting patients. The province also saw its worst year for overdose deaths: nearly seven people died of an opioid overdose each day in BC in 2023.

While the pilot project was intended to last three years, the resulting chaos and crime made the NDP scramble to address growing public backlash.

Eby asked the federal government to put an end to it on April 26. This came after Eby tried but failed to implement legislation in October of 2023 that would make it illegal to consume illicit drugs in public spaces, including on playgrounds. As reported by The Publica, the BC Supreme Court overruled Eby’s legislation, arguing that drug users have a constitutional right to use in public spaces.

It took a long while for these liberal policies to begin really ruining the lives of normal people. These people were able to promote insane gibberish like “legalizing drugs and allowing people to use them in public will reduce drug use.”

Now that so many of these policies have failed so abysmally, there is room to introduce a new way of thinking. The liberal way of thinking has become very comfortable for people, but they can see it isn’t working. Maybe the understanding that all of these things happening are all tied to a single mode of thinking is not consciously obvious to everyone, but it is certainly understood unconsciously, and now is the time when people become open to new ways of thinking.

This is to save lives, goy

Hey – it just makes common sense.

We have to save lives by giving out fentanyl to kids.

National Post:

In what constitutes a clear trampling of parental rights, British Columbia recently authorized the provision of “safer supply” fentanyl to youth across the province, regardless if parents are informed of, or agree to, this measure.

The provincial government has provided limited access to safer supply fentanyl since at least 2020, primarily through small-scale pilot projects. However, last August the British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (BCCSU), an influential research organization, published protocols permitting doctors and nurses to prescribe “safe” fentanyl tablets to adults and minors. The organization confirmed to me in an email that it had been contracted by the province to produce these documents “to further support clinicians prescribing safer supply across the province.”

While the B.C. government generally promotes its commitment to safer supply, it was oddly silent in this instance. I became aware of the new protocols only because two concerned addiction physicians contacted me shortly after their publication.

As there has been zero media coverage of this development — excluding a report I authored for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI), published last month — the provincial government has been able to ramp up the distribution of “safe” fentanyl with almost no public scrutiny.

This is a shame, as the new protocols are full of red flags, including a jarring near-absence of safeguarding measures when giving fentanyl to minors, to say nothing of the obvious ethical issues around underage consent.

The only special requirements for underage patients is the use of a “two prescriber approval system,” wherein one prescriber conducts the patient intake interview and another reviews the client’s charts before signing off.

A number of addiction experts have criticized this as deeply inadequate. Dr. Leonora Regenstreif, a Hamilton-based addiction physician, said she found it hard to imagine that two doctors or nurses working in the same clinic would significantly challenge each others’ prescribing decisions.

The protocols do not provide a minimum age for when youth can receive recreational fentanyl. When I asked the BCCSU whether a minimum existed, they did not reply.

The documents also make absolutely no mention of the rights and roles of parents of drug-addicted minors.

In an email, I asked the BCCSU: i) why the fentanyl protocols made no reference to parents; ii) what would the organization say to parents who do not want their children to receive “safe” fentanyl; iii) whether the BCCSU believes that drug-addicted youth can provide informed consent regarding “safe” fentanyl; and iv) what can parents do if they believe that their children are being harmed by safer supply fentanyl?

The BCCSU did not respond to these queries, despite generally answering other emails of mine over the past year.

If the province is going to dole out recreational fentanyl to minors, it should probably have strong evidence backing this decision — but apparently it doesn’t.

The protocols clearly state that, “To date, there is no evidence available supporting this intervention, safety data, or established best practices for when and how to provide it.” In fact, “a discussion of the absence of evidence supporting this approach” is actually required for securing informed consent from patients.

It seems that parents will actually be powerless to stop the government from supplying their children with fentanyl, as safer supply technically counts as a health-care intervention and youth have substantial control over their own medical decisions in Canada.

While some provinces set a minimum age (typically between 14 and 16 years old) for when minors can make such decisions, British Columbia has no minimum and relies instead on a fluid idea of “capability” — youth in the province are considered “capable” if they understand what a medical intervention involves, why it is needed and its risks and benefits.

Yet it is hard to imagine any scenario where a drug-addicted minor would be capable of providing informed consent for safer supply fentanyl, given that addiction hijacks the brain and inhibits rational decision-making. While adults have extensive rights to personal self-determination, which permits them to make impaired or self-destructive decisions if they so choose, it is hard to see why this same freedom should be extended to youth when it comes to using hard drugs.

It is true that many drug-addicted youth are in foster care or estranged from their parents, and that, for them, securing parental consent is near-impossible. Yet making an exception for this subpopulation, and permitting them to receive free fentanyl, could incentivize other underage drug users to cut ties with their families and run away from home to secure free drugs.

As parents are often a youth’s greatest asset for recovery, any safer supply system that undermines child-parent relationships is harmful.

In a sad twist, the same laws that allow the government to give recreational fentanyl to kids without parental consent also prohibit parents from sending their children to involuntary addiction treatment — in other words, the government won’t help you force your kid to get clean, but they will give them unlimited “safe” drugs against your will.

No one ever said a liberal utopia would be easy.

Or pretty.

They might not have told you that the streets of the utopia would be lined with junkies, but they also didn’t tell you that wouldn’t be the case.

Junkies are nearly as oppressed as trannies and niggers.

National Post:

For an NDP government that was looking to take a public stand against rising rates of drug-related disorder, the “playground” amendment was arguably among the least controversial things they could have done.

B.C. was already nine months into an unprecedented pilot project to decriminalize personal amounts of illicit drugs. Fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, meth, MDMA; so long as it was only 2.5 grams, by federal exemption it was now legal to possess illicit drugs basically anywhere in British Columbia.

The “playground” amendment — enacted on Sept. 18 — dialled it back ever so slightly. You could still possess illicit drugs without consequence, but you couldn’t do it within 15 metres of a playground, skate park or “outdoor spray pool or wading pool.” Schools and “child care facility premises” had already been written into the original decriminalization order.

According to the official text of the Restricting Public Consumption of Illegal Substances Act, police were officially discouraged from arresting violators, and if anyone was found using drugs in child-centric areas, officers were instructed to “direct” them elsewhere.

That’s very authoritarian by Canadian standards.

But in an injunction issued just before the end of 2023, the B.C. Supreme Court ruled that even this most delicate check against public drug use was a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

In a Dec. 29 injunction, B.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson ruled that it would impose “irreparable harm” if drug users were warned away from public areas — even if that came at the expense of public parks filled with biohazardous drug paraphernalia and other “social harms” such as “unpredictable behaviour.”

“I … accept that the attendant public safety risks are particularly concerning given that many of the restricted areas and places in the Act are frequented by seniors, people with disabilities, and families with young children,” wrote Hinkson.

This fat fuck thinks he’s doing you a favour

Nevertheless, he concluded that given the severity of the overdose crisis, those concerns had to take second place.

“I am satisfied that the suspension of the Act … can be properly characterized as a substantial public benefit,” he wrote.

It’s just a temporary injunction until March 31, but the entire decision was premised on Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In essence, Hinkson ruled that B.C.’s attempt to restrict open drug use in public areas was a violation of “the right to life, liberty and security of the person.”

This, in turn, was premised on Hinkson accepting the assertion by the plaintiff — the Harm Reduction Nurses Association — that any restriction on drug use in public areas would prompt “lone drug use” and increase the number of British Columbians dying from fatal overdoses.

“It is apparent that public consumption and consuming drugs in the company of others is oftentimes the safest, healthiest, and/or only available option for an individual,” he wrote.

According to the decision, the counter-argument provided by lawyers acting for the Province of B.C. was that the Harm Reduction Nurses Association was mostly making its case with “anecdotal evidence, unsubstantiated conclusory statements” and “layers of unattributed hearsay.”

Hinkson accepted that this might be true, so he instead based his “irreparable harm” conclusions largely on the assertions of a 2022 Death Review Panel by the B.C. Coroner Service.

The B.C. Coroner Service has long been a vocal advocate of harm reduction, including a vast ramp-up in the province’s “safer supply” initiative. Hinkson cited their assertion that “criminalizing drug use behaviour ensures an ongoing public perception that it is deviant and shameful, creating a barrier to people seeking the support they need as well as requiring people to hide their needs for fear of criminal sanctions.”

“Given the evidence before me, I find that there is a high degree of probability that at least some of the harm set out by the plaintiff will in fact occur,” he wrote in a conclusion.

At its unveiling, the “playground” amendment was endorsed by some of the province’s most emphatically pro-harm reduction municipal leaders, including Victoria Mayor Marianne Alto. “As the longer-term effects of decriminalization are assessed … it’s important to consider and take steps that specifically protect children,” she said in a statement at the time.

The context for the amendment was the fast-rising appearance of tent cities across B.C., and mounting reports of drug-related crime and disorder around such sites.

This is no doubt going to be a boon to the city.

Tourists love this kind of vibrancy.

Families take a look at these scenes, and it gives them fond memories they’ll cherish for the rest of their lives.

Just part and parcel of living in utopia

You throw in a couple million refugees from Sierra Leone, and you’ve got yourself a city in competition with Disneyland for “the happiest place on earth.”

One of the main supporters of decriminalizing drugs is an NGO called Pivot Legal Society, which is staffed by the exact kind of people you’d expect it to be

You have to specify “red” or “dot” when you speak of Indians in Canada, because they have a lot of both. Presumably, both are opposed to doing gay anal on little kids, but the former are too drunk to actually protest it.

As you can see from the photos, these are “dot” Indians. Actually, they look like Sikhs, who I don’t think wear the dot.

Jamie, can you pull up whether Sikh women wear dots like Hindu women? It’s all men in these photos.

Life Site News:

Concerned parents from one of Canada’s most pro-LGBT ideologically charged provinces banded together to form a 24/7 multi-day outdoor protest against extreme gender ideology being taught in public schools.

The group of parents from Abbotsford, British Columbia, a city close to Vancouver, since December 24 have been camping outside on a busy street corner protesting that public schools “stop sexualizing our children.”

One of the activists, 41-year-old Kanwaljit Singh, as per a recent True North report, has spent more than a week sleeping outside in a makeshift tent at a busy intersection in protest with signs reading, “Teach geography not pornography.”

The group says it plans to operate the camp into the first week of January. Joining Singh are as many as 200 other concerned parents who have been rotating in shifts to keep the protest going.

Overall, the group has been protesting for months so-called sexual-orientation and gender-identity (SOGI) curriculum being taught in the province’s public schools.

Singh said he took it upon himself to “be here 24/7.”

That is awesome and hardcore.

I wonder why whites don’t do this?

Oh, right – because whites are pathetic Jew-lovers.

“I thought I would just be alone here. But all our brothers and everyone … they’re like, no, we’re not going to let you be alone here,” he said, per True North.

Each night, about four people have kept watch over the camp on privately owned land.

According to the group, they have had many honks in support, notably later in the day by passers-by and motorists.

Singh lost his software engineering job and can stay at the camp. He noted that he had earlier supported the 1 Million March 4 Children in September to protest LGBT indoctrination in schools.

The group noted that they are concerned about pornographic material in many school libraries and said it supports Conservative Party MLA Bruce Banman, who recently called to attention in the provincial legislature the issue of explicit pornography in kids’ books.

Singh noted that he does not “care which party” politicians are from, but if they are “against SOGI and they’re willing to say it publicly,” he said, “we’re with them.”

…

Singh noted that many of the protest supporters are teachers and others involved in the education system, including Christians and Eastern Europeans. The core group of the protestors is Punjabi.

Eastern Europeans are Christians.

LifeSiteNews needs new writers, and they need to embrace antisemitism.

To be fair, they do cover a lot of stories no one else covers.

“Many teachers come here and say, ‘we cannot go public, but we are with you,’” Singh said.

According to Singh, the protesters are not affiliated with any organization and all the tenting gear, along with signs and portable washrooms, have been donated by people sympathetic to their cause.

He noted how SOGI in public schools has become an “indoctrination.”

“Like rainbow flags all over the place. We’re not against it, but the amount it’s happening is disproportionate,” he said.

Some of the activists’ daughters have made complaints about men who say they are women going into women’s washrooms, according to Singh.

The group is also opposed to Canadian federal laws concerning “conversion therapy.”

“Our signs here could potentially get me locked up in prison for two years, because it might be stopping someone from transitioning,” Singh said.

“But on the other hand, anyone can come and tell my children that they should transition, there’s nothing stopping them from doing that.”

Singh called SOGI “tyranny” and blasted “what’s happening to children.”

In 2021, the federal government passed Bill C-4, banning so-called “conversion therapy,” which included in its broad definition any form of talk therapy, even with a consenting adult who freely wants to overcome unwanted sexual attractions.

Bill C-4 punishes anyone helping children or others with gender confusion or unwanted same-sex attraction with jail time of up to five years.

Yeah, they’ll put you in jail for 5 years for telling a child not to be a tranny.

Unless you say you’re insane and poor, and then they’ll just kill you.

I guess immigration does have some good points…

Take note: LifeSiteNews is reporting on this, but no one from the site is going to join the Indians, even though it’s a Canadian site.

Again, they do alright reporting most of the time, but they literally claim that it’s anti-Christian to be against the Jews who are doing the abortion and the trannies they oppose.

Well, well, well.

Isn’t this just perfect?

This is exactly what the US did to Saudi Arabia, which triggered a series of events that led to them basically abandoning the West as an ally.

This is exactly what I wanted to happen with India, who has been fence-riding for too long.

Obviously, it’s irrelevant whether or not they did this. The US assassinates people all the time, often openly in public. It’s just something that any state has to do from time to time. That’s life.

ABC News:

Canadian national security agencies are investigating “credible allegations” that “agents of the government of India” were involved in the death of a Canadian Sikh leader in June, Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced Monday.

Trudeau said that steps are being taken to hold the people accountable behind the death of prominent Sikh leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar in British Columbia.

“Canada is a rule of law country, the protection of our citizens in [defense] of our sovereignty are fundamental,” Trudeau said in a statement addressing the House of Commons. “Our top priorities have therefore been one, that our law enforcement and security agencies ensure the continued safety of all Canadians.”

Melany Joly, Canada’s foreign affairs minister, announced the country will oust a “key Indian diplomat” and anticipated India to “fully collaborate” with Canada to get answers, according to CTV News.

Nijjar was killed on June 18 near a Sikh cultural center in Surrey, British Columbia, according to The Associated Press.

Picture from Surrey, British Columbia

He advocated for the creation of Khalistan, an independent Sikh homeland in India’s Punjab region, according to CTV News.

Sikhs in Canada protested over Nijjar’s death, accusing the Indian government of being behind the slaying, according to CTV News.

Early Tuesday morning from New Dehli, the Indian government released a statement saying they “reject” the statement from Trudeau.

“Allegations of Government of India’s involvement in any act of violence in Canada are absurd and motivated,” the statement read. “Similar allegations were made by the Canadian Prime Minister to our Prime Minister, and were completely rejected. We are a democratic polity with a strong commitment to rule of law.”

…

Trudeau told the House of Commons he brought his concerns directly to India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi at last week’s G-20 summit in New Delhi.

“Any involvement of a foreign government in the killing of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil is an unacceptable violation of our sovereignty,” Trudeau said.

Canadian Trade Minister Mary Ng said Friday she’s postponing a trade mission to India that was scheduled for October, after tensions between the two countries escalated after Modi reprimanded Trudeau during the G-20 summit, according to Reuters.

Yeah, this is going to spin out into a whole thing. When they start expelling diplomats and canceling trade missions… it’s already pretty much over.

Brandon is no doubt going to get on board very soon.

India and Modi will be under constant assault, and they will have no choice but to go all in with the Chinese.

After all, the Chinese might be their ancient blood enemy, but the Chinese aren’t showing up to give them moral lectures and making all of these faggy demands.

India is on a majorly impressive trajectory economically, especially considering that the elite of that country are carrying hundreds of millions of people who are basically dead weight in the modern world. They don’t need this crap with Uncle Sam (or Uncle Moose, I guess presently) trying to sabotage their national agenda.

China is going to swoop in with an offer of Sino-Friendship, and that will be that.

I have no idea why the West keeps sabotaging their own alliances. Typically, if one of you allies assassinates someone (or if you think that happened – we should note that nothing has been proved), you downplay it and frame it on extremists. But we now have the “Prince Salman” precedent, where instead of downplaying it, you make a huge global moral lecturing scene – without ever explaining how this is different from the assassinations that the US constantly carries out.

This is very, very good for people who are against the Anal Empire. Modi is not going to tolerate being morally condemned.

I don’t write much about him, but he’s a pretty cool guy. I mean, whatever, I don’t care that much about India, but he’s India first, and that means he’s not going to be prone to supporting the Anal Empire, which demands that every country it is aligned with make huge national sacrifices for the benefit of the United States.

Case in point – look at Germany, which has been bullied into collapsing their economy, deindustrializing, so they can support the US’s anti-Russia and anti-China agendas. I wrote about this the other day – The Economist was lecturing Chancellor Stolz about his bad economy, and he was like “well, our economy is bad because we’re supporting the Ukraine war and cutting trade with China” – of course, he didn’t say “i.e., because we’re following the orders of the United States,” but everyone gets it.

Modi isn’t going to do that sort of thing, which is why he’s totally refused to engage with the US anti-Russian sanctions program. He’s also not going to stand for being morality lectured over an assassination of some whiny homo that he may or may not even have had anything to do with.

In Anal Canada, your asshole is the path to success!

Life Site News:

The NDP government of the Canadian province of British Columbia passed into law a bill that allows kids facing gender confusion as young as 12 to “self” identify their gender without the need for a doctor or mental health professional’s approval.

Bill 15 was introduced by NDP Minister for Health Adrian Dixon on March 9 and passed by the BC legislature on March 28.

Besides the law allowing kids as young as 12 to legally change their sex and self-identify their gender, it will also let any resident of the province be given a birth certificate without marker showing that one is male or female.

NDP Minister of State for Child Care Grace Lore, a former gender studies professor, praised the fact a kid can now change their gender on the whim and at will.

“By law, those 12 and older do NOT need a doc or psychologist in order to change their gender marker AND, by request, people can get a birth certificate without a gender marker on it. Also – protect trans kids,” Lore tweeted.

BC’s new law allowing kids to change their gender on a dime comes despite the fact many U.S. states are banning “sex changes” or the genital mutilation of kids.

Also in British Columbia:

]]> https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/02/02/canadian-province-decriminalizes-virtually-all-hard-drugs/ Thu, 02 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0000

Hear that sound? That sweet, sharp sound?

That’s the train whistle blowing. We’re rolling out of patriarchal white supremacy.

Next stop?

Utopia.

Fox News:

One of the largest provinces in Canada is moving forward with a plan to become the first province in the country to decriminalize several hard drugs.

Starting on Tuesday, residents of British Columbia who are older than 18 will be allowed to carry up to 2.5 grams of drugs such as cocaine, heroin, fentanyl, methamphetamine and morphine, the BBC reported.

British Columbia was granted permission by the government to try out the plan for three years, when the drugs will still be illegal but those carrying less than 2.5 grams will not be arrested, charged or have the drugs confiscated.

Instead, residents carrying the drugs will be offered information on health and social services.

As of Jan. 31, 2023, adults aged 18+ in BC who possess 2.5g or less of certain illegal drugs for personal use will not face criminal charges. BC will be the 1st province to take this step to treat addiction as a health issue, not a criminal justice one. https://t.co/jAa8Ehmcqt pic.twitter.com/0yMqnvvp6k

— BC Government News (@BCGovNews) January 26, 2023

“Decriminalizing people who use drugs breaks down the fear and shame associated with substance use and ensures they feel safer reaching out for life-saving supports,” Jennifer Whiteside, the British Columbia minister for mental health and addictions, said about the plan.

Carolyn Bennett, Canada’s federal minister of mental health and addictions, said the move is a “a monumental shift in drug policy that favors fostering trusting and supportive relationships in health and social services over further criminalization”.

…

Many critics of the plan in Canada say it does not go far enough and that 2.5 grams is too low of a threshold that will not make a difference for users who consume large amounts of drugs.

“Decriminalization, to my mind, would be if you have a substance for personal use, then it’s for personal use, and the police should not have a role to play in that. … What you decide to use for your personal needs is your choice,” Lisa Lapointe, British Columbia’s chief coroner, told CBC.Some have publicly voiced opposition to decriminalizing drugs, including Chuck Doucette, president of the Drug Prevention Network of Canada, who said that “making drug use easier for them is kind of like palliative care.”

“It’s just condemning them to a slow death because of drugs, whereas if you get them off drugs, get them a life back, they can enjoy life,” Doucette said, the New York Times reported, adding that the plan is a “cop out” and that drug users should be provided help addressing the root causes “that led them to use drugs in the first place.”

This is literally just culling the population.

No one thinks this kind approach leads to less drug users or less drug deaths. The whole argument is that it’s nice. But of course, if you were a crooked elite that wanted large numbers of people dead, this is exactly what you would do.

You can then blame the victims for their own deaths.

Remember: as the bodies pile up in the streets, these people are telling you with a straight face that we are on the road to a utopia and the only thing in the way is white racism and the patriarchy.

It’s interesting that the overwhelming majority of these drug deaths are young white men, no? Seems maybe relevant. Perhaps.

Much tolerance

If Canada were a real country, I’m 99% sure they’d make the cuck podium.

They’d kick Germany off third place easily.

Daily Wire:

Sixteen Canadian women have had human rights complaints filed against them by a male-to-female transgender individual for alleged “gender identity” discrimination after they refused to wax his male genitalia.

John Carpay, a lawyer and the president of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, is representing two of the women who are being targeted by the complainant, who is referred to only as “JY.” In accordance with an order from the BC Human Rights Tribunal, the transgender individual must be kept anonymous.

While all White countries right now have a judicial system who’s main purpose is destroying society in whatever manner possible – Canada also has a second layer of even more arbitrary institutions doing the same thing.

And from what I can tell, they’re basically made in such a way that encourages people that had complaints against them settle/agree to get shaken down early on, which is what this freak is doing.

“In recent months, JY approached 16 Vancouver-area female estheticians who only serve women, requesting a ‘Brazilian’ bikini wax on his groin area,” revealed Carpay on Tuesday. “In spite of the fact that JY is able to obtain a Manzilian in Vancouver, JY has filed 16 complaints against these women at the BC Human Rights Tribunal, claiming discrimination on the basis of ‘gender identity.'”

The female estheticians in question only serve women and do not offer so-called “Manzilians” — the male equivalent to a Brazilian wax. “The procedure for providing a man with a ‘Manzilian’ is quite different, using a different kind of wax and a different technique,” noted the lawyer.

So this man-pretending-to-be-a-woman – or maybe a BASED leaf in disguise –  was actively looking for a quick buck.

According to the lawyer, JY said he was willing to withdraw his complaint against Poyer for $2,500.“If JY is demanding similar sums from the other 14 women, he stands to receive as much as $35,000 for dropping his human rights complaints,” noted Carpay.

How much is 35K Canadian dollars in real money?

Not too shabby.

Being (((oppressed))) sounds like an easy way to get money for literally nothing.

All of you reading this who live in these reverse-nuthouses like Canada, Sweden, Britain, etc. should be making money from being oppressed – and of course sending a part to DS for giving you the idea.

Should be profitable, fun AND completely safe – because what government employee in CURRENT YEAR will have the balls to say that you can’t be a woman if you have balls?

The complaint against Poyer, however, was withdrawn without so much as a hearing after Carpay informed JY in September that he’d be challenging the complaint:

…

Carpay claims fighting the complaint through to a hearing can cost an esthetician upward of $20,000, thus noting how tempting it might be to pay off JY his requested amount — especially if these women do not have legal representation, which seems highly likely.

So this lawyer scared him off, but he’s still got more than a dozen thots to extort.

And it’s probably gonna work too – if the costs for this are 20K and the outcome unsure, why wouldn’t you just pay 10% and get over it.

“One of the women represented by the Justice Centre had approached, and had been turned down by 26 different lawyers and law firms. All of which cited lack of expertise in human rights proceedings, or fear of offending the transgender lobby, or both,” he explained.

Moreover, the Tribunal has refused to inform the 14 other women that theJustice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms would be willing to represent them against the complaint free of charge.“Without legal representation, it is likely that most or all of these 14 women are going to pay settlement money to JY, to escape the very stressful tribunal process,” Carpay stressed.

So the system is literally stacked up against normal people…

All the more reason to start pretending you’re not normal yourself and make some money off it, ideally by targeting people who are actual freaks.

You don’t even really have to do anything too radical – for example, you can be a guy who just says he’s a woman and that’s it, and if someone asks you why you’re not wearing a dress or something, you can just say you identify as a bulldyke, or report him to the police/goofy tribunal thing for heteronormative harassment or something (always be updated on the terminology, it comes in handy).

There is no reason not to do this, and virtually no risks.

We live in a society that tries its best to harm us in every way it can, and we should reciprocate in every way we can.

We were warned about men pretending to be women, but didn’t listen… And now it’s too late.

Hey, this could have some potential as an all White community.

50 acres of land, 22 buildings on it already.

Keep it quiet for the time being if you do though….

RT:

A 50-acre ghost town Bradian in Canada’s British Columbia province is up for sale with the cost of all its 22 buildings now having dropped – to a “mere” $995,000.

Located 4 hours from Vancouver, the mining town in the South Chilcotin Mountains has just four residents. Still it can boast 22 buildings on over 50 acres of land, with phone and power lines intact.

It was one of the many towns, dotted all around the Bridge River Valley, which reached its glory in the 1930s gold rush. But nothing lasts, and its remaining residents put it on sale in February 2010. At that time the price was higher at $1.3 million.

However, even the promises of “one of the best snowmobiling areas in B.C.” and “a once in a lifetime opportunity” didn’t save the realtor from having to bringing down the price.

John Lovelace is selling the property for Tom and Katherine Gutenberg from Vancouver, who – in their turn – bought it in 1997 and have used it as a summer vacation site with their kids ever since.

“It was disappearing at the rate of several houses per year, people would simply dismantle them for parts,”Tom told Pique magazine back in 2010, when the couple decided to pass the baton of the town keeping. “It’s important for us to keep that sort of thing and that really was my intent, to save that piece of B.C. history.”

As Bradian has been on sale for over 4 years, Lovelace has received dozens of inquiries, but most would-be purchasers shy away as they realized the costly perspectives of owning a town that needs to be constantly upgraded.

“It’s an ongoing initiative for us. The problem is that, for someone to get involved, it’s going to involve some imagination and somebody with deep pockets — that’s always been the issue,” Lovelace told The Province.

“At the end of the road, there’s a big reward, as there would be in most things in life,” the realtor said. “In this one, there’s the magic of owning a ghost town.”