Brave is run by Brendan Eich, who is a Christian. He is the inventor of Javascript, and he was working at Mozilla developing Firefox until he was fired for donating to an organization devoted to protecting traditional marriage.

After being fired, he launched Brave, which is a privacy-oriented browser based on the open-source version of Chrome, and it has become the single best browser available, very quickly.

It is the official browser of the Daily Stormer, and we encourage everyone to download it. If you’re currently using Firefox or Chrome or God have mercy on you Internet Explorer or Safari, it’s going to change your life.

The browser includes Tor access, as well as an adblocker, tracking script blocker, and various other improvements by default. Now the company is moving away from a reliance on Google as search.

The Register:

Brave, maker of the identically named privacy-focused web browser, has acquired its own search engine to offer as an alternative to Google Search and competing search engines that exist but aren’t all that visible in Google’s shadow.

On Wednesday, the company plans to announce that it’s taking over Tailcat, a search engine developed by Cliqz, another privacy-focused browser biz that aspired to compete with Google and shut down last year. The deal, terms undisclosed, makes Cliqz owner Hubert Burda Media a Brave shareholder.

Brave intends to make Tailcat the foundation of its own search service, Brave Search. The company hopes that its more than 25 million monthly active Brave customers will, after an initial period of testing and courtship, choose to make Brave Search their default search engine and will use it alongside other parts of its privacy-oriented portfolio, which also includes Brave Ads, news reader Brave Today, Brave Firewall+VPN, and video conferencing system Brave Together.

Brave Search, the company insists, will respect people’s privacy by not tracking or profiling those using the service. And it may even offer a way to end the debate about search engine bias by turning search result output over to a community-run filtering system called Goggles.

The service will, eventually, be available as a paid option – for those who want to pay for search results without ads – though its more common incarnation is likely to be ad-supported, in conjunction with Brave Ads. The latter offers participants the option to receive 70 per cent of the payment made by the advertiser in a cryptocurrency called BAT (Brave Attention Token).

…

In an interview with The Register, Brendan Eich, CEO of Brave, argued that the demand for privacy is real and cannot be ignored. “I think the genie doesn’t go back in the bottle,” he said. “Consciousness doesn’t revert.”

People used to hear about credit card breaches at large retailers like Target, Eich said, and think that privacy is hopeless but not something that necessarily affects them directly. But then it became more personal as technologies like ad retargeting did things like spoiling surprise gifts by showing the ad for the purchased item again to the intended recipient.

Eich sees the dominance of US tech companies contributing to the interest in privacy and making it a matter of concern for regulators around the world.

“It’s not political in the broken US sense – which is kind of a Punch and Judy show – it’s more like there are people of various commitments on all sides of politics who are aware not only of privacy being violated over time by the big tech players but of the big tech players being abusive monopolies,” he said.

Pointing to how many companies now make privacy claims, Eich said, “I think privacy is here to stay and now the question is how people do it and market it effectively. If you don’t market it, you can lose to somebody who just puts privacy perfume on a pig and tells you it smells great and tastes delicious.”

Eich’s pitch is not that Brave Search aims to take on Google Search directly. He acknowledges that there’s no way to match Google’s vast index and ability to return relevant results for obscure (long tail) search terms. Rather, he sees an opportunity to improve specific types of search queries, referred to as vertical markets.

“Part of what we’re trying to do here is innovate in the area where there’s now monopoly,” he said in reference to Google Search, which has a market share of something like 92 per cent.”…The innovation through verticals is possible because it avoids having to take on Google’s supreme competence, which is the rare or unique queries the long tail.”

“What we’re trying to do is different, it’s not based on crawling the web,” Eich explained. “…Trying to crawl the whole web, it’s not going to work. What Cliqz worked on..that’s an anonymous query log aggregator, and a partial click log aggregator, to see when you don’t convert on the search ad you leave the results page and you find the better results through some number of clicks.”

…

The Brave Search team has written a paper [PDF] explaining its use of the term, titled “GOGGLES: Democracy dies in darkness, and so does the Web.” The browser upstart aims to replace the tyranny of Google’s inscrutable, authoritative index with a multiverse of indices defined by anyone with the inclination to do so.

Brave’s vision of search is based on “an open and collaborative system by which a community, or a single user, can create sets of rules and filters, called Goggles, to define the space which a search engine can pull results from,” the paper explains.

“Instead of a single ranking algorithm, we could have as many as needed, overcoming the biases that a single actor (the search engine) embeds into the results.”

The idea is solid, and based on the fact that Eich is behind it, I’m sure it will work.

We use the search engine a lot, and Google has become almost entirely useless, due to the political and informational censorship they’ve embraced. It’s a bigger issue than simply looking for politically sensitive information. It’s failing to deliver relevant results at all.

The other search engines are all equally flawed, not because of censorship so much as just the inability to index and catalog the internet.

Search is something that should be controlled by some objective body run by the government, frankly, where it is forced to undergo public scrutiny and is subject to transparency laws. Of course, that’s not how we do things in the West anymore – it’s just all an utterly corrupt free for all.

Nothing is really going to change, on the grand scale, until there is some kind of serious meltdown of the system.

But it’s great that people like Brendan Eich are making life easier and more tolerable for the people subjected to these abuses by the system.

You should have already installed Firefox.

You should have uninstalled it because its parent company, Mozilla, ousted its leader, Brendan Eich – who was basically working at the company as a form of charity – in 2014 for being a Christian.

Then, you should have uninstalled it because after Eich was forced out, the browser turned into absolute garbage, and became virtually unusable.

Now, however, anyone who keeps Firefox on their computer is effectively a traitor to America, and to the entire human race, if not to the universe itself.

Mozilla has just released a completely unhinged, lunatic statement calling for an even more extreme crackdown on free speech, which involves as of yet not understood methods of censorship.

This is from their official blog, a post written by current CEO Mitchell Baker:

There is no question that social media played a role in the siege and take-over of the US Capitol on January 6.

…

But as reprehensible as the actions of Donald Trump are, the rampant use of the internet to foment violence and hate, and reinforce white supremacy is about more than any one personality. Donald Trump is certainly not the first politician to exploit the architecture of the internet in this way, and he won’t be the last. We need solutions that don’t start after untold damage has been done.

Changing these dangerous dynamics requires more than just the temporary silencing or permanent removal of bad actors from social media platforms.

Additional precise and specific actions must also be taken:  

Reveal who is paying for advertisements, how much they are paying and who is being targeted.

Commit to meaningful transparency of platform algorithms so we know how and what content is being amplified, to whom, and the associated impact.

Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.

Work with independent researchers to facilitate in-depth studies of the platforms’ impact on people and our societies, and what we can do to improve things.

These are actions the platforms can and should commit to today. The answer is not to do away with the internet, but to build a better one that can withstand and gird against these types of challenges. This is how we can begin to do that.

What they are talking about is using high tech machine learning algorithms and censoring every kind of speech that Jews disagree with as a kind of pre-crime measure.

Hey Mozilla  – why not just install computer chips in people’s brains that regulate their thoughts?

Isn’t that obviously where this is all going? Everyone sees that. So why not just come out and say it, frankly?

Who is Mozilla?

As I said, in 2014, Mozilla ousted their White Christian CEO because he was a Christian.

Who is running their company now?

Well, when you click on “who we are” on their website, it shows a stock photo of a black bitch and a white bitch.

But the head of the company, currently, and the author of the “control the minds of the goyim” statement released this week, is Mitchell Baker – who, despite having a man’s name, is a used up white woman. She is ugly (like something out of Resident Evil, actually) and has short hair.

Her Wikipedia page says that she studied Chinese Communist Propaganda in college – which is funny on a number of different levels.

She’s been running Mozilla into the ground since Eich was ousted, and made the Firefox browser literally useless. Like, Javascript does not even work in the current release of Firefox.

Of the 11 members of the leadership team of Mozilla, 7 are women. Because women have really played a crucial role in developing the internet, right? Made lots of major contributions, like posting pictures of their disgusting tits and what they ate for dinner.

Of the four men, two are visibly Jewish.

It is absolutely bizarre to have Mozilla, which was the successor to Netscape, coming out and demanding mass censorship on a whole new scale. Netscape and then Mozilla always represented the original idea of the internet, which was freedom. Freedom for everyone. Total democratization of speech and thought.

It’s a big Jewish joke to take a company like that and have them become the forefront of calling for shutting everyone down and creating new sociological departments to create algorithms that will shut people down as soon as they might come close to considering disagreeing with Jews.

I called the events of January 6 “Charlottesville 2,” and this really is like deja vu all over again, watching all of these rats come out and demand new forms of censorship, new ways to control the thoughts of the people.

You’re going to see backbone internet services coming out with new forms of censorship, and you’re going to see companies like Comcast and the various cellphone companies beginning discussions about hard blocking web addresses. Frankly, I’m not going to be at the top of that discussion, because I’m blacklisted from being discussed in the media. But it will be Alex Jones, QAnon stuff, 4chan, whatever – they’ll say they need to prevent people from communicating with each other by any means necessary.

Remember that, always: if they control your speech, they control your thoughts. That is what this is about. They want to control your thoughts, because they believe that they own not only your body, but your mind and your soul.

Mozilla Cares About Privacy?

Mozilla literally declared they want to hunt down and destroy the brains of anyone who disagrees with the ruling elite – and yet they are out there claiming that they care about privacy.

Do you trust an organization that has literally stated publicly that they have a desire to physically go into your brain and rearrange your thoughts to protect your privacy?

Personally, I would not trust that.

Instead, I would trust Brendan Eich, the white CHRISTIAN who runs Brave Browser.

Download Brave Browser NOW!

Install it on your computer and on your phone, and refuse to use any other browser. It is not only the most moral and the most CHRISTIAN of any browser, but it is also – by pure coincidence, I’m sure – the one that works the best.

Firefox is not only a crappy browser, they think they have a right to control your thoughts. They think they own your soul. These people are actually pure evil.

Full disclosure: I was using Firefox for the very specific purpose of streaming YouTube videos on OBS, up until today. The problem was that OBS can’t capture video on Brave, for whatever reason. I uninstalled Firefox anyway, and said “well, I guess we just won’t have video on my streams anymore – because I’m not supporting this company.”

And then, by the will of GOD, I downloaded Vivaldi, which for whatever reason OBS is able to capture. So, for anyone who was using Firefox for this very specific purpose of stream internet video through OBS, go download Vivaldi.

Otherwise, everyone use BRAVE.

Brave not only doesn’t try to censor you, but they are actively, aggressively against censorship, and include Tor access in their browser.

Remember everyone: save the Daily Stormer Tor address. At some point, you’re going to need it.

dstormer6em3i4km.onion

Netflix recently published a dramatized documentary, “The Social Dilemma,” on the rise of social networks and the way they have transformed our society.

It is actually very good, shedding light on an issue that is usually only discussed in the more psychedelic sections of the Daily Stormer: the way our minds and our very souls are being shaped by the exploitation of technology by the new corporate-technocrat ruling class.

The presentation is meant to appeal to normal people, so it does put on a dazzling air of stupidity. But despite its tacky style, this film is exactly what that special boomer or slut in your life needs to make them want to use less social media.

It also personally horrifies you by revealing how pathetically soft, womanly and literally, physiologically limp-wristed the cubicle drones who manage the day-to-day issues of our system of surveillance capitalism are.

In the first twenty minutes, after a negative soundbite flood of equal parts election hacking hysteria and Tucker Carlson social media addiction alarmism, they resumed the whole situation:

• The advertisers are the consumers, and our perceptions and behaviors are the products.
• We, as humans, have been literally commodified and commercialized, and the trading in the futures of our thoughts and behaviors is a huge and growing part of the economy.
• In order to sustain this industry, detailed, permanent and secret behavior records and psychological models are kept about everyone, which analyze and predict thoughts, emotion and behavior.
• There is no end in sight to this, and people can be expected to become more immersed in these systems of control as time goes on.

The film delivers these points in a way that is very clear and concise. It is impactful even for someone who has read a lot about the issue.

It’s recommended.

The film’s director, Jeff Orlowski, does not appear to be Jewish. He is certainly a liberal, and has previously made a film about global warming. However, this whole issue of engineering society using computer algorithms, and the general takeover of society by extreme technology, is one of the very few remaining places where left and right can come together and say, “this is a bad idea.” That is, as long as by “right” we don’t mean “Sean Hannity” – because Sean Hannity will say that people have a right to do anything they want to your brain as long as they’re making money, and you can choose to not be addicted to social media.

That is the libertarian “there is no such thing as society” position, which is more of a boomer idea than it is a right-wing idea. (Before the boomers, libertarianism was a leftist-Jewish ideology, which had nothing to do with right-wing or conservative thought, given that it necessarily leads to overwhelmingly negative outcomes).

Netflix Tho?

As far as the fact that The Social Dilemma is on Netflix – well, Netflix buys the distribution rights of all kinds of films. This isn’t actually a Netflix production. I understand that not many people want to support Netflix, especially now that they’re openly promoting pedophilia. But I also suspect many of you still have it, and if you don’t, you know someone who does (maybe it would be fun to watch with the parents or the wife/girlfriend’s parents).

If you’re a total NEET who doesn’t have Netflix, doesn’t have friends and doesn’t see your parents, you already have a lot of problems you need to work on, but I suspect one of those problems is not an inability to download Netflix shows without paying for Netflix.

Speaking of that theoretical activity, which you would only theoretically ever partake in if you lived in a country where such things were legal – did you know that the official Stormer-endorsed browser, Brave, has a built-in support for downloading torrents?

Note that if you are going to use this functionality, the save function is a little bit confusing. You have to click the save button, after the download is complete.

Brave also has full support for Tor, blocks ads, promotes privacy by blocking trackers, and uses cryptocurrency.

Brave is the kind of thing that comes about when white male Christians are allowed to operate their own companies, and you should absolutely be using it if you’re not already.

As far as using its torrent tracker for downloading things other than Linux distros – that’s something that, if you were a criminal, you would only ever do using a VPN, because otherwise you’d probably get a letter from your ISP saying they’ll cancel your service if you don’t stop doing that.

Of course, if you’re an absolute lunatic, you’re currently sitting there thinking: “yeah but if there’s Tor and torrent in the same browser…” – and yes, I read you. However, I have not tested this personally, both because I’m not a criminal and because I legitimately do not know the difference between a “motorbus” and an “autobus.”

This new “hCaptcha” being implemented on certain sites as a response to Tor traffic is really just the worst thing I’ve ever encountered on the entire internet.

Most of my work is done inside of a web browser. Almost all of it.

Firefox fired Brendan Eich for being a Christian, and then he created Brave.

His firing like this, specifically for donating money to a Christian group that opposed “gay marriage” – as any actual Christian group does – set a new precedent for silencing political thought in 2014. This was the precedent on which James Damore was fired from Google – the idea that you aren’t allowed to have certain personal opinions and work at a major corporation.

So maybe this is why I’m thinking about it now, as I have just been the target of multiple precedent-setting attacks on freedom of speech. Mine was a bigger deal, but these things tend to get bigger as they progress.

Firefox has been cruising on Eich’s genius for a couple of years, like Apple was cruising on Jobs’ before the current stagnation.

Meanwhile, Eich was developing this new one. As Firefox is finally starting to lose its stored magic, Brave appears to be developed enough to use as a main browser for some people.

I’ve been using it on my phone for some weeks now (a phone browser obviously has to do a lot less, but I find that it preferable to FF, Chrome, Opera and Safari mobile versions), and have recently installed it on my computer and am testing it out.

It’s based on what seems to be a gimmick, but actually sort of isn’t: it automatically blocks ads and then gives you the option of donating to sites that you regularly frequent through Bitcoin. The browser itself calculates your budget and distributes it to the sites that you visit.

This actually makes a whole lot of sense, given that so many people are now using adblockers that not using them is rapidly becoming financially unsustainable for content-based sites that have relied on them.

I think it is almost certainly going to become the best browser eventually, but it isn’t there yet.

Switching is a big thing for me. I like to only have one primary browser. Nowadays, I alternate between FF and Chromium, because neither really fits fully what I need it to do.

Presently, it is a long way away from being capable of functioning as a regular primary browser for me. You can install extensions from Chrome, sort of, given that the browser is based on the open-source Blink software that Chrome is based on. But they often do not work. I don’t know the timeline for actually setting up their own extensions, but I’m sure that add-on developers would be happy to port their apps to it once that is available.

Earlier this year, Eich raised $35 million in under 30 seconds, so there is a lot of excitement about it in the tech community.

I view this as a part of what has been labeled “Alt-Tech,” and it is something that I want to support.

I like Eich and give him mad respek for not cucking out on being a Christian in order to save his project and I pretty much like everything about the idea of Brave.

Just wanted to make a post about it and get others’ thoughts and experiences with the browser in the comments, as well as share it with those who haven’t heard of it.

The download is here:

brave.com

Or in iStore or Google Play for the mobile version (which again, functions well as a primary phone browser).

nb4 “Anglin, you and the rest of our favorite Alt-Right sites should apply to be partners and we will all sign-up and support you and the rest of our favorite Alt-Right sites that way” – I may do that eventually, but I’m not going to do it right now. There are too many people who would feel strongly either way on me or other Alt-Right sites being confirmed or denied by Eich for me to put that on them before they are more stable. Neither “Eich supports neo-Nazis” or “Eich is going along with big tech companies and silencing speech” is something that I want to put on him and his company just now.

Also, I don’t have my dot com in my own possession right now, and will need to get that worked out, something which could take months. Google has still not contacted me about it.

Currently, 10% of the US population supports the Alt-Right, and in the next year that will double, and then accepting us on this type of service will not be such a difficult or controversial decision.