Remember when they told you that black people only commit crimes because the police exist?

Do you remember that? That actually happened in real life, like 4 years ago. They said if you abolished the police, blacks would stop committing crimes. Then the government went along with it, shrank police forces, and started moving police out of black neighborhoods.

I haven’t really been following the crime rates, but I assume it worked, and after drastically scaling back policing of black neighborhoods, blacks have completely stopped committing crimes.

You see where I’m going with this?

Can you SMELL what I’ve got cooking?

If the government stopped investigating Boeing, their jets would stop falling apart in the air.

The Hill:

Another Boeing whistleblower has stepped forward, a Senate office announced hours before the company’s CEO is set to testify Tuesday in Washington for the first time since the door plug of a 737 Max 9 blew off during an Alaska Airlines flight in January.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal’s (D-Conn.) office identified the whistleblower as Sam Mohawk, a quality assurance inspector for the planemaker in Renton, Wash. Mohawk alleges Boeing improperly tracked and stored faulty parts, and that those parts were likely installed on airplanes including the 737 Max, which is manufactured at the Renton facility.

“Mohawk has also alleged that he has been told by his supervisors to conceal evidence from the FAA, and that he is being retaliated against as result,” according to a statement from the Senate Homeland Security’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

“We received this document late Monday evening and are reviewing the claims. We continuously encourage employees to report all concerns as our priority is to ensure the safety of our airplanes and the flying public,” a Boeing spokesperson told The Hill.

Blumenthal chairs Homeland Security’s investigations subcommittee, which is slated to grill Boeing CEO David Calhoun on the company’s “broken safety culture” at 2 p.m. EDT.

…

Federal aviation experts identified “gaps” in Boeing safety culture in a February FAA report that began before the Alaska Airlines blowout. The company presented its 11-page “Product Safety and Quality Plan” to the FAA last month detailing steps the company has taken to improve its safety culture and how it will measure its progress.

Multiple whistleblowers have come forward with allegations that the planemaker cut corners to increase profit and retaliated against employees who spoke up. Several testified before the subcommittee in April.

And yet, no one is being charged with any crimes…

What do you guys think about the conspiracy theory that Boeing’s collapse is not actually due to the diversity hires, they just want right-wingers to think that, and it’s really about the global warming hoax and shutting down air travel for the goyim?

Personally, I don’t see why Boeing would be going along with that, and also this would be happening even if there was no conspiracy, because you can’t do social science type forced diversity in real professions like the manufacturing and maintenance of jet planes.

But let us know what you think in the comments below!

During that hearing, Sam Salehpour, another Boeing quality engineer, alleged the company isolated, transferred and threatened him after he raised concerns that the fuselage of the company’s 787 Dreamliner were not properly fused together, which could cause the plane to break apart midflight.

“I want to make clear that I have raised these issues over three years. I was ignored. I was told not to create delays. I was told, frankly, to shut up,” Salehpour said.

After that hearing, a Boeing spokesperson told The Hill the company is “fully confident in the safety and durability of the 787 Dreamliner” and “extensive and rigorous testing of the fuselage and heavy maintenance checks of nearly 700 in-service airplanes to date have found zero evidence of airframe fatigue.”

Dreamliner, huh?

Maybe they should have used reverse psychology and called it “The Nightmare Express”?

Boeing has been working to get back in the good graces of lawmakers in the wake of the Alaska Airlines incident. A Boeing spokesperson previously told The Hill that the company’s in-house lobbying team had reached out to all 535 members of Congress within a week of the accident.

Blumenthal expressed concern with what he described as “a culture that enables retaliation against those who do not submit to the bottom line” ahead of the hearing.

“This is a culture that continues to prioritize profits, push limits, and disregard its workers. A culture where those who speak up are silenced and sidelined while blame is pushed down to the factory floor,” Blumenthal said in a statement.

Shut up, kike.

If profit were the only thing they cared about, these things wouldn’t happen, because it’s obvious they’d make more money if they didn’t have all these constant breakdowns everywhere.

The real problem is elsewhere…

Andrew Anglin contributed to this article. 

This is not the type of individual who you want programming code for software used to control an aircraft.

One of the biggest aviation-related stories in the past several months has been the crashes of two Boeing 737 Max planes. The crashes forced a mass grounding of the plane model. At first these crashes were assumed to be largely the result of the racially diverse pilot crews. After all, it was an Ethiopian Airlines flight and a Lion Air flight that crashed. Ethiopian Airlines is the state-run airliner of Ethiopia and Lion Air is a low cost Indonesian airliner.

While pilot error may have certainly contributed to these crashes, it looks like software problems may have also played a role. It could have even been a combination of the two. The reason being is because Boeing decided to outsource critical software engineering work for the Boeing 737 Max plane to a bunch of low paid Indian street-shitters.

Bloomberg:

It remains the mystery at the heart of Boeing Co.’s 737 Max crisis: how a company renowned for meticulous design made seemingly basic software mistakes leading to a pair of deadly crashes. Longtime Boeing engineers say the effort was complicated by a push to outsource work to lower-paid contractors.

The Max software — plagued by issues that could keep the planes grounded months longer after U.S. regulators this week revealed a new flaw — was developed at a time Boeing was laying off experienced engineers and pressing suppliers to cut costs.

Increasingly, the iconic American planemaker and its subcontractors have relied on temporary workers making as little as $9 an hour to develop and test software, often from countries lacking a deep background in aerospace — notably India.

In offices across from Seattle’s Boeing Field, recent college graduates employed by the Indian software developer HCL Technologies Ltd. occupied several rows of desks, said Mark Rabin, a former Boeing software engineer who worked in a flight-test group that supported the Max.

The coders from HCL were typically designing to specifications set by Boeing. Still, “it was controversial because it was far less efficient than Boeing engineers just writing the code,” Rabin said. Frequently, he recalled, “it took many rounds going back and forth because the code was not done correctly.”

In other words, Boeing’s management thought they could get away with cutting costs by hiring these $9-an-hour Indians. This was a very stupid decision. It’s insane to hire a bunch of incompetent Indians to write and test code for a software application that is critical to the lives of people on board an aircraft.

Anybody who has worked in the technology industry understands that Indians are horrible to work with. Not only do they speak poor English and are difficult to work with, but they are generally bad at performing tasks to a reasonable standard.

But you don’t have to take my word for it, it is admitted in the above blurb from the Bloomberg article. The dotheads kept fucking up the software code and it took them several tries to write the code correctly.

It boggles the mind that we have people in corporations who think it is smart to outsource this type of important technology work to low IQ Indians. Had Boeing tasked a group of experienced and qualified White male engineers with coding and testing the software, the end product would have been completed faster and done to a reasonable standard.

Yes, Boeing would have had to pay the White male engineers more money but it would have been worth it in the long run. Because based on what we are looking at here, it appears as if the street-poopers fucked up the software, and this in turn was a contributing factor to the two crashes. The crashes have totally tainted the Boeing 737 Max brand because people no longer feel safe flying in them.

One can only guess how many millions of dollars this debacle has cost Boeing. And it looks like it all could have been avoided if they had just paid a team of White male software engineers a reasonable six-figure salary to do the work. But since it would be “racist” and “sexist” to even propose such a thing, a brand has been destroyed, enormous amounts of money have been lost and people are dead.

Nothing good has resulted from corporations outsourcing work to third world countries. This is just another example proving it.