Several people have complained that I am celebrating the coming schism in the Catholic Church, and warned that this is not something that should be celebrated.

I’ve considered this, and decided I do not know the answer and cannot find proper guidance on it. I do think that schism is unfortunate and bad in and of itself, but given that we are talking about schism from the Anal Order of Pope Boy-Fucker, it seems to me that it is a good thing.

However, I believe probably that celebrating it is not a good thing. This is all extremely tragic. It’s similar to if you have to kill your wife because she files for divorce. It’s not to be celebrated. There is nothing joyful about having to kill the mother of your children.

What I will say: schism is inevitable. People are flipping out. The Pope can’t fire everyone complaining about his fisting agenda. There is nothing that can happen other than a schism. And the schism will be good, because the people will follow God instead of following the Pope straight into a young boy’s anus.

But I agree to not celebrate it, for fear of God. God is not happy with any of this.

I will celebrate the downfall of the Anal Lord Francis, because God hates that faggot. But the inevitable schism he has triggered is a tragedy.

I don’t know that there was anything that could have stopped all of these things from occurring. It’s really Americanism. It’s all Americanism, which is Judaism, and Judaism is Satanism, and gay anal is the favorite activity for Satan to encourage among the children of God, as it is the ultimate crime against man and nature.

Bishops are demanding Anal Law be repealed. Priests are praying for the death of the Pope.

There are many, many Catholics who simply will not tolerate this anal inside of the Church.

This schism is coming now.

New York Post:

Six priests are facing “corrective measures” for a mock prayer that Pope Francis “go to heaven as soon as possible” during a conservative-leaning gathering aired on YouTube.

Archbishop Francisco Cerro Chaves, of Toledo, Spain, rebuked the group of priests in a statement on the archdiocese website over the comments the priests made during a video titled “The Sacristy of the Vendée. A counter-revolutionary priestly gathering” posted earlier this month.

In the clip, a Toledo priest says in his introduction “I also pray a lot for the Pope, so that he can go to heaven as soon as possible” — prompting laughter from the other priests present for the religious discussion, The Independent reported.

…

The Sacristy of the Vendée group offered a mild apology in a statement posted on X — but said the comment was made in jest.

“We are sorry for the unfortunate comment, said in a humorous tone, about ‘praying for the Pope to go to Heaven as soon as possible,’” it said.

“It is a comment in bad taste and, although it does not express wishes for the death of the Pope, as some media have maliciously spread … we understand that it can be understood that way,” the group added.

The Pope dying would not actually do anything. The entire Vatican is now controlled by a cartel of boy-fuckers.

That’s the reality.

Sorry.

It just is what it is, and there is currently nothing anyone can do to change it. The Church is not a democracy. No number of conservative clergy can organize and reverse this anal revolution.

It’s a a done deal.

It will be reversed. But several unfortunate events are going to have to take place before that happens.

…comprendemos que se pueda entender de esa forma.

— La Sacristía de La Vendée (@LSDLVdirecto) February 28, 2024

3) Nos duele haber podido confundir a las almas sencillas que encuentran en nuestro programa formación y consuelo. Muchos nos reconocen un papel importante en su perseverancia en la fe católica y nos preocupa haber podido causar desconcierto o escándalo en sus almas.

— La Sacristía de La Vendée (@LSDLVdirecto) February 28, 2024

5) Por último, lamentamos los problemas ocasionados a nuestros obispados respectivos ante la llegada de protestas coordinadas por nuestras acciones. No estaría mal que aquellos que agradecen nuestra labor manifestaran, si les parece oportuno, su apoyo.
¡Viva Cristo Rey!

— La Sacristía de La Vendée (@LSDLVdirecto) February 28, 2024

Pope Francis has defended the landmark decision to approve same-sex blessings, his first public comments since the Dec. 18 Vatican approval sparked widespread debate in the Church https://t.co/Otsd0kqhcE pic.twitter.com/It6pYcFC4E

— Reuters (@Reuters) January 15, 2024

You’re just too stupid to understand the joy of anal, says the Pope.

You see, when you have a penis up your ass, it rubs against your prostate, which creates a lot of love.

That’s why we know that anal ramming is true love, and therefore needs to be approved by the Vatican.

It’s science.

Reuters:

Pope Francis on Sunday defended a landmark decision approving blessings for same-sex couples, suggesting that those in the Catholic Church who have resisted it have jumped to “ugly conclusions” because they do not understand it.

In a television interview, Francis made his first public comments since the Dec. 18 declaration sparked widespread debate in the Church, with bishops in some countries, particularly in Africa, refusing to let their priests implement it.

“Sometimes decisions are not accepted, but in most cases when decisions are not accepted, it is because they are not understood,” Francis said in response to a specific question about the December declaration.

See?

These stupid niggers just can’t understand. They can’t understand anything.

The Pope added: “Niggers never even invented the wheel, so of course they can’t understand that stimulating a prostate with a penis or a fist creates true love.” (Note: he didn’t actually say that, but that is the implication here.)

“The danger is that if I don’t like something and I put it (the opposition) in my heart, I become a resistance and jump to ugly conclusions,” he said during a link from his Vatican residence with the “Che Tempo Che Fa” program on Italy’s Channel 9.

“This is what happened with these latest decisions on blessings for all,” he said, referring to the declaration known by its Latin title Fiducia Supplicans (Supplicating Trust). It was issued by the Vatican’s doctrinal department and approved by him.

Since the original declaration, the Vatican has been at pains to stress that the blessings did not amount to an approval of gay sex and should not be seen as anything remotely equivalent to the sacrament of marriage for heterosexual couples.

The “blessings” do amount to an approval of gay sex. They absolutely by definition amount to that.

Before this change the Pope implemented, homosexuals were not banned from the church. They had the same rights as everyone else. Now, they have special rights.

Can a pimp and his hoes receive a “blessing” from a priest now? If not, then why? It doesn’t make any sense. This stupid legalism, where they say “oh but we’re not actually blessing the gay sex, just the people and their relationship” is insane. It is meaningless gibberish designed to allow for the normalization of homosexual couples being approved of by the church.

YOU COULD ALREADY BE GAY AND GO TO A CHURCH AND REPENT. THAT WAS ALWAYS THE RULE. NO SINNER WAS EVER TURNED AWAY. THAT’S THE CORE CONCEPT OF THE RELIGION.

The people defending this are going to answer to God for it. I’m absolutely disgusted by the supposed right-wingers who are defending this.

Seriously, bro: What Would Jesus Do?

I understand that authority is important, but it’s not more important than right and wrong. Anal sex with men is wrong. It is one of the single most wrong things you can do.

Imagine if Jesus was here, in the flesh.

Do you think He would say “no, this is definitely evil, but it’s okay because he technically has the authority to do this so we have to respect his authority and not question the fact that homosexuals are in churches getting some kind of “blessing” from priests for their “relationship”?

If you can say, with a straight face, that Jesus would support this, then you are very brave, but I have a kind of awe for the boldness of that blasphemy.

If you can say “no, obviously Jesus wouldn’t support this,” then you need to ask yourself why it is you are defending it.