Well, this is uncomfortable.

New York Post:

Forget crowd sizes — a new study confirms that conservatives boast slightly larger amygdalas, the part of the brain that plays a key role in identifying and reacting to potential threats, compared with liberals.

“A slightly larger amygdala simply highlights a brain’s increased sensitivity to issues related to [the] need for security, reduction of uncertainty and threat, or perhaps more careful processing of negative stimuli,” study author Diamantis Petropoulos Petalas told The Post.

The amygdala is about as big as a shelled peanut — and the difference between conservatives and liberals is about the size of a sesame seed, Petalas said.

Having a larger amygdala could be attributed to genes, the environment, or most likely, a combination of the two, he added. It is possibly related to a “larger proclivity for understanding danger.”

Petalas’ research, published Thursday in the Cell Press journal iScience, aimed to replicate a widely shared 2011 University College London study criticized for only having 90 participants.

I think we all understand what is going on here.

But what does the amygdala do, exactly?

Wikipedia:

The amygdala has a primary role in the processing of memory, decision-making, and emotional responses (including fear, anxiety, and aggression).

Hmm.

I think if the New York Post understood the racist and sexist implications here, they would not have published the article.

It’s very funny that we now say “race and sex does not exist,” but then say “but the groups with the most white men have better brains.”

What’s up Alexi? Yes it’s true. I know…thousands of people have already brought that up. They were good. We actually lost to a youth Bayern Munich team in my career as well but then we went on to win Olympics and World Cups. So….. https://t.co/nJwfwDJzcM

— Carli Lloyd (@CarliLloyd) November 9, 2023

Haha. They should beat us. Bigger, stronger, faster! Boys always gave us a run for our money! It was great prep. https://t.co/QCuxA1jM40

— Carli Lloyd (@CarliLloyd) November 9, 2023

It is true that men are much bigger and stronger than women.

However, this is due to oppression. Women are scared to grow taller because men intimidate them.

Science has shown that women are exactly the same as men, and therefore it is a scientific fact that the reason women are shorter and less powerful is that they’ve been oppressed into it.

New York Post:

USWNT legend Carli Lloyd shared one of her most embarrassing moments representing the United States when her team lost to the FC Dallas boys U-15 team.

While answering questions on X, Lloyd was asked by one user “Carli is it true you lost to a bunch of 15 year old boys?”

“Yes it’s true. I know…thousands of people have already brought that up,” Lloyd answered. “They were good.

Lloyd went on to say the loss wasn’t the only one she experienced at the hands of a male team, but that it helped her secure some prestigious tournaments, including gold medals at two FIFA World Cups (2015, 2019) and two Olympics (2008, 2012)

“We actually lost to a youth Bayern Munich team in my career as well but then we went on to win Olympics and World Cups. So…..” Lloyd added.

This happened in 2017, and led to some of the funniest headlines ever.

It should have been obvious that the women would lose badly, but I think the people that set this up actually believed in this “biological equality” stuff, and didn’t realize how brutal it would be.

FC Dallas defeated the USWNT 5-2 and was used by the US as a tune-up before an international friendly against Russia, according to CBSSports.

One user shared a photo under Lloyd’s post showcasing the size difference between the women and the teen boys.

“Typically when someone mentions this, I’ll post one of the pub photos of you standing with one of the boys… who is a foot taller than you. I mean, c’mon!” one user commented.

“They should beat us. Bigger, stronger, faster! Boys always gave us a run for our money! It was great prep,” Lloyd wrote in response.

Well. Yes.

But some of the better players are short. Longer legs may generally indicate faster running, but soccer is not basketball.

Some of the best teams are from Latin America, where people are very short.

One of the top players on the Venezuelan national team is 5’2″. This is shorter than the average white woman. The average female height in America is 5’3″. There are a lot of top players under 5’6″.

There are physical factors, but not as most sports.

What I’m getting at: female intelligence is also much lower, and more importantly here, their spacial awareness is abysmal. If it was just a running contest, or even a lower-body strength contest, professional female sportsmen would lose to amateur 15-year-old boys, but they would not get blown out.

Soccer involves intelligence, which is why women suck at it and also why few blacks ever reach the highest levels, even though blacks tend to be both faster and stronger than other races. (nb4 some white supremacy faggot posts about whites dominating body-building – yeah, bro, it’s because body-building is complicated and requires intelligence. A random, untrained black is always going to be stronger than a random, untrained white. They have higher testosterone and simply have better muscle mass, most fast twitch. If you feel you need to say whites are superior to blacks in every way, you probably have a personal issue. There’s a reason they dominate basketball. There’s no reason to hate on these people unnecessarily. We can complain about their behavior, we can call out specific biological differences like average IQ, but there’s no need for hatred and weird false claims.)

People Don’t Want to Watch This Shit

One of the most insane things this side of child trannies is vaginal soccer players claiming they should get paid the same as male players. They actually get paid much more, proportionally, if we look at the profits of the sport. Based on basic math, they are getting paid more than men, by a lot.

The problem is: people want to watch good players. That’s what’s exciting in sports, is seeing a high level of talent. If that were not the case, then high school teams would be playing at the Superdome.

It’s the same stupid hoax, where a secret sexism/racism conspiracy no one can actually identify is blamed for something obvious. If female players played at the same level as male players, women’s sports would be just as popular. And indeed, we don’t have to take that as theory: several Olympic sports, where women can actually do good – gymnastics, ice skating, probably others – are very popular. Women’s tennis is popular.

People are really objective about this stuff. I am this way. I have no trouble saying that James Cameron’s ex-wife, Kathryn Bigelow, is a very good film director. Why should I lie about that? These films are legitimately good, including Strange Days, which is criminally underrated (it was one of the most thought-provoking near-future scifi films of the mid-1990s, a period of a lot of near-future scifi films), and Near Dark, which is also probably underrated (though has a bit of “cult” status now). I also appreciate Jane Austen and maybe a couple other female novelists. I appreciate several female musicians (though mostly just for their singing, female singer-songwriters are not typically very good, though there are a few indie/emo ones I appreciate – it’s unclear how much input Taylor Swift has on her songs, but insofar as she actually wrote any of them herself, they are good). Tina Fey was legitimately funny, and Mean Girls is one of the best comedy films ever, in my opinion.

I take the same approach to blacks and everything else. I don’t believe politically in the “colorblind meritocracy” that cucked-out conservatives like Tucker Carlson promote, because this just amounts to “white people being bulldozed by Asians,” and I don’t think the purpose of the American university system is to serve as a service for Asians. It’s our country, we should be first. But on the personal level, when evaluating performance, I am colorblind/genital blind. It’s just an unfortunate fact that women are not generally very good at anything.

We should be dealing with reality, not goofy fantasy.

I don’t think that many of us realized that Carlos Santana is still alive.

There is no worse possible way to find out that Carlos Santana is still alive than reading that he’s bowing down and groveling to trannies after saying that there are only two sexes.

CNN:

Carlos Santana faced criticism on Thursday when a video of the musician making anti-transgender comments during a concert in New Jersey in July resurfaced on social media.

“When God made you and me, before we came out of the womb, you know who you are and what you are,” the guitarist is seen saying in the clip.

He continued, “Later on when you grow up, and you see things and you start believing that you could be something that sounds good but you know it ain’t right, because a woman is a woman and a man is a man — that’s it.”

“Whatever you wanna do in the closet, that’s your business, I’m OK with that,” Santana added, before mentioning his closeness to his “brother Dave Chapelle,” who also faced criticism for anti-LGBTQ comments made in his 2021 Netflix comedy special “The Closer.”

The criticism Santana faced on Thursday prompted the “Smooth” singer to release a statement on his Facebook page, where he wrote, “I am sorry for my insensitive comments.”

“They don’t reflect that I want to honor and respect all person’s (sic) ideals and beliefs. I realize that what I said hurt people and that was not my intent. I sincerely apologize to the transgender community and everyone I offended,” his statement continued.

Yeah, bro. It for sure would have been a lot better if you’d died.

I never wanted to witness an 80-year-old Mexican guitarist say “I sincerely apologize to the transgender community.”

Santana went on to mention that his “personal goal” is to “honor and respect all person’s (sic) ideals and beliefs whether they are LGBTQ or not. This is the planet of free will and we have all been given this gift. I will now pursue this goal to be happy and have fun, and for everyone to believe what they want and follow in your hearts without fear.”

“It takes courage to grow and glow in the light that you are and to be true, genuine, and authentic. We grow and learn to shine our light with Love and compliments,” he concluded.

Yeah.

Either people forget about you and then you die, or you live long enough to be totally forgotten to the point that people think you’re dead and then they’re reminded you’re alive when you’re bullied into prostrating yourself before the tranny agenda.

The dude must have his money, right? He’s only touring for something to do now, right?

I mean, I don’t agree with a 35-year-old apologizing to the trannies. But I can at least understand, they think they’ve gotta get their money. But when you’re 80, and no one even thinks you’re alive anymore…

It’s just really sad, Carlos.

Snake Baker contributed to this article. 

Chromosomes are a canard.

Genetics are a white supremacy conspiracy theory.

New York Post:

A biology professor at a Texas community college has claimed he was fired for “religious preaching” after he taught a lesson about how sex is determined by X and Y chromosomes.

Johnson Varkey, who has taught at St. Philip’s College in San Antonio for 20 years, claimed he was accused of “religious preaching” and let go after he discussed the human reproductive system during a lesson on Nov. 28, 2022, which led to four students walking out of the lecture hall.

The First Liberty Institute, a Texas-based nonprofit Christian conservative law firm, last week sent a letter to the school on behalf of the veteran educator demanding his reinstatement.

“The college fired him for teaching basic and widely accepted concepts of biology. We’re asking the college to immediately reinstate Dr. Varkey to his position and clear his record of any wrongdoing,” the institute said in a statement.

Varkey, an adjunct professor, has taught human anatomy and physiology to more than 1,500 students since 2003, according to First Liberty.

“During Dr. Varkey’s 20-year employment as a biology professor at St. Philip’s College, he consistently received exemplary performance reviews and was never subject to discipline. Throughout that time, he never discussed with any student his personal views — religious or otherwise — on human gender or sexuality,” it said.

The law firm claimed the four students stormed out of the lecture hall when Varkey “stated, consistent with his study of human biology and religious beliefs, that sex was determined by chromosomes X and Y. In two decades of teaching these basic, unremarkable concepts, no other students complained.”

The X and Y chromosomes — also known as the sex chromosomes — determine the biological sex of an individual. Females inherit an X chromosome while males inherit a Y chromosome.

In January, he received a “Notice of Discipline and Termination of Employment and Contract letter stating that the school ‘received numerous complaints’ about his ‘religious preaching, discriminatory comments about homosexuals and transgender individuals, anti-abortion rhetoric, and misogynistic banter,” First Liberty said.

The college’s letter also allegedly stated that Varkey’s teaching “pushed beyond the bounds of academic freedom with [his] personal opinions that were offensive to many individuals in the classroom.”

“In other words, he was fired for teaching true and widely accepted concepts. The statements he made are supported by research and consistent with his professional experience and education,” the law firm said.

Varkey was described as “a devout Christian” who volunteers as an associate pastor at his church and hosts a Bible-teaching radio ministry.

“Like millions of religious Americans, Dr. Varkey has a sincerely held belief that God created humankind male and female,” First Liberty said “His faith teaches that one’s sex is ordained by God, that one should love and care for the body that God gave him or her, and that one should not attempt to erase or alter his or her sex, whether through drugs or surgical means.”

In its letter, the law firm accused St. Philip’s College of violating multiple laws that protect Americans from being punished for holding or expressing their religious beliefs.

…

The law firm said public universities cannot fire professors “for teaching actual science. It’s harmful to academic freedom. It’s also harmful to religious liberty, as the college is sending a message that people of faith are not welcome and need not apply.”

It added: “Dr. Varkey is the latest example of an everyday American who lost his job to a toxic cancel culture that is infecting employers across the country.”

None of these lawsuits do anything.

Rarely, people get paid, but they are still fired.

You can’t change the system.

The system is designed in such a way that it will collapse before it allows anyone to change it.

I should have suspected the Apple Watch was racist.

After all, it is white.

Fox Business:

A New York man filed a class-action lawsuit against Apple on Dec. 24, alleging that the Apple Watch’s blood oximeter has a “racial bias” against individuals with darker skin tones.

The Blood Oxygen app is available on Apple Watch Series 6 and newer and can “measure the oxygen level of your blood on-demand directly from your wrist, providing you with insights into your overall wellness,” Apple explains.

New York resident Alex Morales alleges that he purchased an Apple Watch between 2020 and 2021, and was aware that the watch “purported to measure blood oxygen levels and he believed it did this without regard to skin tone,” according to the lawsuit, which was filed in the Southern District of New York.

The lawsuit further alleges that during the coronavirus pandemic, researchers “confirmed the clinical significance of racial bias of pulse oximetry” using patients’ records.

“For decades, there have been reports that such devices were significantly less accurate in measuring blood oxygen levels based on skin color,” the lawsuit reads.

“The ‘real world significance’ of this bias lay unaddressed until the middle of the Coronavirus pandemic, which converged with a greater awareness of structural racism which exists in many aspects of society.”

The lawsuit further adds that the watch would call the man a “cornbread smelling jigaboo” and then start making monkey noises while flashing banana emojis.

Natalie Ryan is making history as a transgender athlete in Disc Golf.

Last weekend she won the MVP Open, her second title of the year.

She talked with @ChardonnayM
after her big win.https://t.co/ach6ATQTWm

— Outsports (@outsports) September 29, 2022

It’s so wonderful that trannies are now destroying sports where women shouldn’t even have an advantage.

Breitbart:

In shades of biological male Lia Thomas’s domination of women’s college swimming last season, the world of professional women’s disc golf now finds itself beset with a biological male claiming to be a transgender woman who is knocking natural-born women out of top money all across the country.

Like Lia Thomas, all year, this new trans athlete, Natalie Ryan, has been taking home one trophy after another — and the thousands of dollars in prize money that comes along with them. And Ryan, who has instantaneously jumped into the rankings as the world’s fifth best-ranked women’s disc golfer, has only been playing the sport for a mere three years.

Disc golf has been shocked as Ryan has come out of nowhere to dominate women’s disc golf, knocking women out of the rankings which have been playing for many years.

In a far-reaching article on Ryan’s sudden rise to top rankings in the sport, Quillette’s Jonathan Kay notes that most women feel compelled to remain quiet on the unfairness of Ryan’s miraculous rise to the top. Still, a few women did speak out to him anonymously for fear of retaliation.

I'm thankful for @thediscgolfguy giving Natalie Ryan a place to speak, and a platform to give everyone a dose of the truth of what it's like to be a transgender woman in disc golf.

If you listen to her story on @SmashBoxxTV and don't understand a little better, that's on you.

— Mike Sullivan (Sully) (@sully68783) October 27, 2021

This year, Ryan won July’s Great Lakes Open in Milford, Mich., taking home $6,000 for a first-place finish, beating the sport’s no. 2-ranked player Paige Pierce. The Great Lakes Open was touted as a great leap forward because it featured a men’s and women’s division in disc golf. But, with Ryan winning the women’s division, it turned out men won both top categories.

As it happens, Paige Piece has been playing disc golf professionally for at least a decade and is a five-time Disc Golf world champion. But this year, she faced a “female” disc golfer who is only in the third season of playing and has soared to the top of this pro sport.

Ryan then entered the recent Disc Golf Pro Tour event held in Leicester, Mass., and toppled the sport’s no. 1 female player, Kristin Tattar. As a result, Ryan took home the top $9,000 prize, pushing Tatter to second place for $6,000.

Kay noted that many women in the sport feel pressured not to speak out against the transgender player. However, two women did supply Kay with some quotes but chose to remain anonymous for fear of being punished by the woke mob.

“I would say that one of the biggest advantages of the [male-bodied] players is their ability to scramble in tight situations when a disc goes off the fairway, to just stand there and blast a shot through the woods,” one woman said. “I’ve seen both [trans player] Chloe [Alice], and Natalie [Ryan] do this. They’re just standing still and throw the kind of [forehand shot] that I’ve never seen a female throw even under perfect conditions.”

The question of power seems to have been underscored since Ryan also won the 2021 U.S. Distance Championship women’s division with a throw of 458 feet.

Another woman told Kay that Ryan’s “form” isn’t even that good.

“What makes it worse is that Ryan’s form isn’t even that good,” the player said. “If it were, she’d be out-throwing us by even more. So while the rest of us spend years refining our form, trying to keep up and get more distance, she’s been in the sport only—what?—three years or something. And she’s already said [publicly], ‘Oh, I’ve got my form down. I don’t need to practice that.’”

Notice how even when whining anonymously, women still refer to him as “she.”

And these brainless, spineless sheep have the right to vote…

A lack of form should not be surprising for anyone who only joined a sport a few years ago.

For his part, Ryan is pushing back on detractors by noting that the sport’s no. 2 female player, Paige Piece, is still topping the scoreboard.

“That’s not true. Paige out-drove me almost every hole out here today,” Ryan said after winning in July. “The people that are out there that think I don’t deserve to be here haven’t realized that I can’t do anything in this sport better than anyone else. I do some things very well, but I don’t do things the best across the board.”

The Professional Disc Golf Association (PDGA) has also come out to defend Ryan as a “woman” and celebrated Ryan’s “historic win.”

“This past weekend, Natalie Ryan had a historic victory at Discraft’s Great Lakes Open,” the statement read. “Since her win, we have seen an increase in the volume of questions and feedback from the disc golf community on the topic of gender-based divisions and fair play.”

Women lose again – big time.

How embarrassing.

It is against the law to not embrace the delusions of trannies.

You have to go to jail.

The College Fix:

Three male students at a Wisconsin middle school have been charged with Title IX-based “harassment” for allegedly using “incorrect pronouns” with a classmate.

According to WBAY.com, the trio did not use their classmate’s “requested pronouns of ‘they’ and ‘them.’” A section in the Title IX law “prohibits gender-based harassment in the form of name-calling on the basis of sex.”

The mother of one of the students said she told Kiel Area School District officials “the use of the pronouns was confusing to her son,” and as such she told him to call the classmate by their actual name.

She added her son “had no obligation” to use the classmate’s desired pronouns and that sexual harassment means things like “rape, incest [and] inappropriate touching.”

She asked “What did my son do? He’s a little boy. He told me that he was being charged with sexual harassment for not using the right pronouns.”

Attorneys from the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) want the charges against the Kiel Middle School boys dropped and their records expunged — or else there is “a strong possibility” they’ll sue the school district.

In a letter addressed to Kiel Superintendent Brad Ebert, Title IX Compliance Officer Megan Kautzer and Principal/Title IX Investigator Chad Ramminger (pictured), the attorneys detail how the complaint and investigation into the matter were “wholly inappropriate.”

“The mere use of biologically correct pronouns not only does not constitute sexual harassment under Title IX or the District’s own policy, it is also speech protected by the First Amendment,” the letter reads. It notes that while both policies contain a “catchall for ‘unwelcome conduct,’” courts have “made clear” such does not cover things such as “commonplace schoolyard altercations, [such as] name-calling, teasing, and minor physical scuffles […] even where these comments target differences in gender.”

In a statement, Superintendent Ebert said “[The district] prohibits all forms of bullying and harassment in accordance with all laws, including Title IX, and will continue to support ALL students regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, creed, pregnancy, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, sex (including transgender status, change of sex or gender identity), or physical, mental, emotional or learning disability (‘Protected Classes’) in any of its student programs and activities; this is consistent with school board policy. We do not comment on any student matters.”

This is unreal. A Wisconsin school district filed a Title IX complaint against 3 middle school students, accusing them of sexual harassment for using incorrect pronouns when addressing another student. pic.twitter.com/GEEjXoEnxW

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 13, 2022

Although the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty letter lists Mr. Ramminger as “Title IX Investigator,” the district website only has him as principal of Zielanis Elementary School and an administrator of Between the Lakes Virtual Academy. WILL attorney Luke Berg told The Fix via email he wasn’t certain if Ramminger officially has a title involved with Title IX, but does “for purposes of the allegations against the boys.”

You don’t have any constitutional rights when it comes to child anal.

This is a rules-based democracy.

Children do anal. You can’t disagree, you cannot make fun of them, you cannot question the various things they insert into their anuses.

Remember when it made sense when they told you that it was just two consenting adults ramming their penises into each other’s anuses in the privacy of their own bedrooms so it was none of your business?

Because I don’t remember that making sense.

I was very young at the time, but I had this device called a Slip ‘n Slide.

And I pondered it.

Life Site News:

Mexico’s Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) has affirmed that a “fundamental right to personal identity” includes the right to change one’s date of birth on government documents, vindicating conservative claims about the “slippery slope” of transgender ideology.

The ruling, issued December 3 and brought to light this week by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) International attorney Tomas Henriquez, concerns the proper interpretation of Section III of Article 1193 of the Family Code of the State of Sinaloa and whether it allows for birth dates to be changed on birth certificates prior to their registration.

The Court ruled that, under the Mexican Constitution’s recognition of individuals’ “right to identity,” a birth certificate should reflect how someone has “constantly identified himself in his private and public acts,” as identity is comprised of more than just “biological truth.” Therefore, the law at issue must be interpreted “in a broad and non-exhaustive sense” to allow for changing birth dates, as long as such changes are not undertaken “to create, modify or extinguish rights or obligations to the detriment of third parties.”

Henriquez suggested that the development was an inevitable byproduct of indulging the notion that gender identity is “fluid,” and that individuals’ confusion about what they are should trump their objective biological sex:

This was obvious to anyone who wanted to see it. The Court now explicitly states it. The "logic" behind "gender identity" is the same as with age. To control one's own biography, it is the will of the subject that determines reality.(2)

— Tomas Henriquez 🇨🇱(🌳🪓) (@jthenriquezc) December 6, 2021

But we know that gender identity cannot be questioned, so age will soon follow. Expect the criteria to be restrictive, to point of no effect.

Are we now going to take seriously that gender ideology jeopardizes our capacity as society to perceive and affirm reality? Tic Toc. (4)

— Tomas Henriquez 🇨🇱(🌳🪓) (@jthenriquezc) December 6, 2021

The outcome also marks a change in how seriously such “age identity” claims are taken. In 2018, a Dutch court rejected a bid by life coach and “political provocateur” Emile Ratelband, who was 69 years old at the time, to change his date of birth to make himself twenty years younger on paper.

This may seem harmless.

The age of consent in Mexico is 12, so that’s not the goal here. At least not in Mexico.

But it is just a further degrading of the notion of reality itself.

These people are literally telling you that physical reality does not exist, and they are going to take any opportunity they can to pump that narrative. “The orbit of the earth is relative and open to personal interpretation” is at least on par with “there is no right answer to a math problem, it’s just whatever black kids write down.”

In an effort to promote equity and access for kids of color, girls and low-income students, many math teachers are shifting toward inclusive instruction. It’s controversial. 🧵https://t.co/S3WS2LlZg8

— USA TODAY (@USATODAY) December 7, 2021

Apparently, boomers still don’t really have a very good grasp of where we are right now, in terms of the religion of black worship. Or maybe they just don’t understand that Zoom isn’t a private conversation.

Of course, maybe they understand both, and we’re all just barely holding it together under this virus regime.

Here’s what’s clear: you can’t say anything, in public or in private, about black people. It doesn’t matter if it’s a fact, and it doesn’t matter what you mean by it. You can’t say it.

The Hill:

Georgetown Law has fired a professor for “reprehensible” comments about Black students that were shared online.

Dean of Georgetown Law Bill Treanor said he was “appalled” by the “reprehensible” statements made by former professor Sandra Sellers and David Batson, another professor who was placed on administration leave, in a letter to the Georgetown Law community on Thursday.

Treanor said he spoke with both professors while reviewing the incident for further context.

“I informed Professor Sellers that I was terminating her relationship with Georgetown Law effective immediately. During our conversation, she told me that she had intended to resign. As a result of my decision, Professor Sellers is no longer affiliated with Georgetown Law,” Treanor said.

Batson has been placed on administrative leave pending an investigation by the school’s Office of Diversity, Equity and Affirmative Action. Batson will not be involved in courses while the investigation is being conducted.

“This is by no means the end of our work to address the many structural issues of racism reflected in this painful incident, including explicit and implicit bias, bystander responsibility, and the need for more comprehensive anti-bias training,” Treanor added.

“Bystander responsibility” is a new term you’re going to really start hearing a lot. This is the end of the project of “white silence is violence.” It basically means that if anyone says anything against the official state dogma in your presence, you have to attack them on the spot, and then tattle on them.

Here is the video.

.@GeorgetownLaw negotiations Professors Sandra Sellers and David Batson being openly racist on a recorded Zoom call.

Beyond unacceptable. pic.twitter.com/q5MoWjBok8

— Hassan Ahmad (@hahmad1996) March 10, 2021

Sellers says:

You know what, I hate to say this, I end up having this angst every semister that a lot of my lower ones are blacks. Happens almost every semister, and it’s like, oh come on. There’s some really good ones. But there are also some that are just plain at the bottom. It drives me crazy.

Batson replies “em-em.”

It’s a noncontroversial fact that blacks as a group score significantly lower in every academic field. The mainstream explanation for this is that it’s because of slavery, and because people hate them because of the color of their skin.

The scientific explanation of course is that blacks have lower IQs, due to evolutionary biology. Obviously, blacks are better at basketball than whites, and they run much faster, so I think it is accepted that there are physiological differences between blacks and whites. But those differences can only be mentioned if they are about blacks being better at something than white people.

The situation is not really confusing in any way. Blacks come from a continent that is fertile and lush, and does not have winter. This means that they did not have to plan out complex systems to keep from starving to death. There is fruit everywhere in African jungles, and fish are plentiful.

Meanwhile in Europe, people had to hunt mammals, and they had to plan for the winter months.

What this means is that if you were born in Europe with a lower IQ, you would be much more likely to end up dying in the winter from the elements. That means that over the course of thousands of years, people with higher IQs were breeding with each other, which led to whites developing much higher average IQs.

This same thing is true of people from Central and South America. If you look at a map of global average IQ, you find that it is very correlated to the climate.

(South America is lighter because it was heavily colonized by Europeans.)

What this means, unfortunately, is that blacks are never really going to get along with white society, at least not if they are expected to compete as equals.

It doesn’t mean that blacks are “bad” or anything else. As I said, there are things that blacks are better at than whites. They are very fast runners, because there were a lot of large cats in Africa, which would semi-regularly eat humans.

Although it is uncomfortable to say it, it is also a fact that cannibalism was a big part of many West African cultures. There was also a lot of war. All of the early missionaries and explorers described this, including David Livingstone. Livingstone was very fond of the Africans, and certainly had no reason to make this up.

The Emin Pasha Relief Expedition in the 1880s was led by Henry Morton Stanley, a journalist and lunatic who I have a lot of respect for as a writer and as a man. Stanley famously met Livingstone on the journey, and finding him as the only white man in the middle of Africa, said “Dr. Livingstone, I presume.” During that expedition, James S. Jameson of the Jameson Whiskey family bought an 11-year-old slave girl and gave her as a gift to a cannibal tribe because he wanted to document the process of killing and eating a human.

I’m just trying to find some information about this online, and it’s hard to do, it seems to have been largely cleansed. But if you read the works of any of the early explorers of Africa, you’re going to find out about cannibalism as a widespread phenomenon.

As we know, cannibalism still happens in Africa. We have probably all seen the old VICE documentary “Cannibal Warlords of Liberia.”

Cannibalism as a cultural norm is going to lead to high levels of aggression and violence, as well as good running skills.

So this sort of background is very much different than that of Europeans, and these differences, over thousands of years, shaped the genetics of the populations.

Expecting equal outcomes in academia is no different than expecting whites to compete well, on average, in sprinting.

The question is: who does it help to claim that blacks are just as capable as whites in academic performance?

Does it help black people to tell them they are just as likely to become successful in academia as whites, and that the only reason they are doing poorly is because of a conspiracy against them by white people?

How on earth does that help the blacks?

The fact is, some blacks are uniquely intelligent, and can do well in academia, just like some whites are uniquely fast, and can compete in certain black-dominated sports. But we’re talking about statistics here, which are not in question.

Telling blacks to go to universities that are built for whites, then telling them that any trouble they have with learning is white people’s fault, is simply cruel to everyone involved, not least the blacks themselves.

This is why, as a matter of principle, I have always promoted the concept of “black self-determination.” I think they need their own institutions, run by their own people, which are designed for their own specific needs.

James Watson, the “Father of DNA,” communicated this same concept.

Here’s from an article from The Independent, January 13, 2019:

The greatest upset came when Dr Watson told an interviewer from the Sunday Times in 2007 he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – where all the testing says not really”.

He added that while he would like everyone to be equal, “people who have to deal with black employees find this is not true”. These remarks, which have been universally derided as based on incredibly shaky scientific foundations, led to a forced retirement for Dr Watson from his chancellor role at Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory.

In the new documentary on PBS celebrating his life, an interviewer asks the 90-year-old scientist if, given the backlash he suffered after his comments about race and intelligence, his views had changed. His answer leaves no room for uncertainty: “No, not at all,” he says. “There’s a difference on the average between blacks and whites on IQ tests. I would say the difference is genetic.”

This man won the Nobel Prize for literally discovering DNA.

The media of course framed him as a hater, but his entire point was that trying to force Africans to follow the same system as whites is only going to lead to misery, as they are genetically different.

There are blacks that would agree about this. In fact, I’m not aware of any blacks currently who actually believe in the Martin Luther King Jr. idea of “we’re all the same and it’s just the color of the skin.”

Joe Biden’s pick for the head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division has written that blacks are genetically superior to whites. If they want to frame things that way, that doesn’t offend me personally, because the important thing is that they recognize the differences are genetic, and understand that we need different systems, and that above all, we need to divorce our two races. We have tried integration, and it has failed miserably. If we had put all of this energy into a functional system of segregation, everyone would be a lot happier.

The brown person who left his babies to fry in a hot car is back in the news!

Daily Mail:

A New York father whose one-year-olds died after he left them in a hot car while he worked an eight-hour shift has been spared a jail sentence after pleading guilty to reckless endangerment.

Juan Rodriguez pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor of two counts of second-degree reckless endangerment but was told that he would be jailed if he was arrested within the next year.

Rodriguez said he thought he had already dropped the twins, a boy and a girl, off at their usual day care before he went to his job at a Bronx hospital last July.

Investigators say Rodriguez parked  him silver Honda Accord with his infants, Phoenix and Luna still in their carseats.

The weather on that July day was in the 80s Fahrenheit with temperatures in the car up to 50 degrees higher.

It wasn’t until after finishing work that he realized the twins were still in the back of the car.

Last year Rodriguez pleaded not guilty to two counts each of manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide and endangering the welfare of a child.

I don’t really care about this story, but there is a lesson within, which you must learn.

I can do it in bulletpoints:

• Brown people have low IQs because they come from areas that didn’t require forward planning to survive. A warm climate does not punish people who do not have the intelligence to plan ahead for the winter.
• Lower IQs lead to a higher death rate because they do stupid things like accidentally forget to not kill their babies.
• The higher death rate means that they have to have more children to continue their race.
• In order to have more children, they need to be more horny, which means they need higher testosterone.
• Higher testosterone leads to lower impulse control and a higher propensity for violence.

That’s it.

Right there.

Your entire “race problem.”

You do not need any Marxist gibberish to explain why these people are poor and violent and tend to do very badly in white societies. It’s just a very simple thing that any 8-year-old child could understand.

Furthermore, there is nothing “hateful” about understanding these facts, because knowing the truth cannot ever be “hateful.” Someone who understands these facts can actually be more compassionate towards these people, and understand that they are not going to succeed in a white culture, and need to be returned to their own countries where they can structure their own culture in a way that jives better with their biology.

As long as they’re here, they’re going to be frustrated and we’re going to be frustrated.

We need to peacefully get them out.