big tech censorship – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png big tech censorship – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 France Charges Telegram CEO, Alleging He is “Allowing Criminal Activity” on Messaging App https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/08/29/france-charges-telegram-ceo-alleging-he-is-allowing-criminal-activity-on-messaging-app/ Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000

🚨 🇫🇷 TELEGRAM FOUNDER PAVEL DUROV RELEASED ON BAIL

Pavel Durov, Telegram’s founder, was released from custody in Paris on €5 million bail.

He faces charges for failing to prevent illicit content on the platform.

Durov must stay in France and report to police twice a week.… https://t.co/nx1VGCs9S1 pic.twitter.com/qPRhijSfeM

— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) August 28, 2024

Do you know who I blame for this?

The Jews.

The Jews were going after TikTok hard, and it was obvious that they were eventually going to hit Telegram. Actually arresting the company’s CEO in France and charging him with not doing enough censorship is a bold and outrageous move, one you wouldn’t expect. But it was obvious they were going to do something.

Shutting down TikTok doesn’t mean much if Telegram is still active.

The Guardian:

The head of Telegram, Pavel Durov, has been charged by the French judiciary for allegedly allowing criminal activity on the messaging app but avoided jail with a €5m bail.

The Russian-born multi-billionaire, who has French citizenship, was granted release on condition that he report to a police station twice a week and remain in France, Paris prosecutor Laure Beccuau said in a statement.

The charges against Durov include complicity in the spread of sexual images of children and a litany of other alleged violations on the messaging app.

Oh yes, of course.

It’s for the children.

Durov, 39, was detained at Le Bourget airport, just outside Paris, on Saturday on suspicion of failing to act against illicit content on the service, including the exchange of child sexual imagery, drug trafficking and fraud.

His surprise arrest has put a spotlight on the criminal liability of Telegram, the popular app with around 1 billion users, and has sparked debate over free speech and government censorship.

Specialist French cybercrime and fraud detectives announced earlier this week that Durov’s arrest was part of a wide-ranging investigation into a failure to moderate alleged criminal activity on the messaging app.

In a statement on Sunday, Telegram said it abided by European Union laws and that its moderation was “within industry standards and constantly improving”.

Well, they’re going to be doing a lot more moderation now.


He will probably make some kind of a deal. You would think he’d do that.

Ultimately, anything can be censored.

You would have thought they would have threatened to ban Telegram from Apple and Google, rather than straight-up arresting the CEO. But that’s what they did! They arrested the CEO! For child porn, apparently!

It’s wacky. Everything getting very wacky.

You should be proud of yourself for holding yourself together, friend.

This is why I said the big internet companies have to be platforms. Imagine charging the Postal Service because someone sent child porn in the mail. It doesn’t make any sense.

]]> Supreme Court Decides Feds Can Order Social Media Companies to Censor Content https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/06/27/supreme-court-decides-feds-can-order-social-media-companies-to-censor-content/ Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000

The Supreme Court got it wrong – and has failed to uphold its responsibility to the Constitution by finding no standing in Murthy v. Missouri. My case of Kennedy v. Biden will proceed in the trial court where there is no question that @ChildrensHD and I have standing. Justice…

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) June 26, 2024

Matt Gaetz is talking like he’s ready for a revolution.

If the Supreme Court is going to throw out the First Amendment and say that the government has a right to tell private companies what they are allowed to publish, how are you going to do mental gymnastics to the point where you can claim that the US government is legitimate?

The Guardian:

The US supreme court has struck down a lower court ruling in the case of Murthy v Missouri, in a decision that did not find the government’s communications with social media platforms about Covid-19 misinformation violated the first amendment. The court’s decision permits the government to call on tech companies to remove falsehoods, a key concern as misinformation spreads around this year’s presidential election.

Well, the government doesn’t have a right to remove “falsehoods.” That is absurd.

But this ruling also claims that the government has the ability to determine what is and is not a falsehood, which is totally unbelievable.

The court ruled 6-3 that the plaintiffs had no standing to bring the case against the Biden administration, with conservative justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissenting. Although many of the arguments in the case centered around how governments and platforms interact with free speech online, the ruling focused more on procedural issues and a lack of legal grounds to bring the case.

“The plaintiffs, without any concrete link between their injuries and the defendants’ conduct, ask us to conduct a review of the years-long communications between dozens of federal officials, across different agencies, with different social-media platforms, about different topics,” conservative justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote. “This court’s standing doctrine prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] general legal oversight’ of the other branches of government” .

…

During oral arguments, the government contended that calling on social media platforms to take stronger measures against misinformation did not amount to threats and never implied legal consequences. Public health experts and state officials had warned that blocking the government from flagging medical misinformation or election falsehoods could cause serious societal harm.

It’s a cop-out on a technicality.

But everyone knows this was not about a technicality. The case was about the government engaging in direct censorship, something which is probably the single most illegal thing the government can do.

But hey – at least they refused to refer to Twitter as “X.”

Gotta give them credit for that.

]]> Instagram Hiding Political Content Until Users Opt In https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/03/27/instagram-hiding-political-content-until-users-opt-in/ Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000

So this is a weird new form of censorship: they don’t tell you that they are now hiding all political content unless you go and click an option.

Most people are too retarded to change their settings. If they know how to change settings, they probably are already aware that the entire Western world is controlled by blood-drinking Jews.

The Guardian:

Instagram users will see less of what Meta deems to be “political” content in their recommendations and feed suggestions unless they opt into it, in a change the company implemented in the past week.

The change requires users to delve into their settings to specifically opt in to political content through their preferences and was first picked up by users on the platform in recent days, implementing a change first announced on 9 February.

It is understood the feature was rolled out in the past week. According to Instagram’s version history in the Apple app store, prior to an update on Monday, the most recent change was a week ago.

The change affects the explore, Reels, and in-feed recommendations and suggested users that Instagram shows to users. The company has stressed users will continue to see political content from the accounts users already follow.

Meta has described what it deems to be political content as “laws, elections or social topics” but not provided more specific information as to what is political.

It applies to Instagram and Threads, and accounts flagged by Meta to be posting political content can appeal against the decision preventing them being recommended into feeds of users who have not opted in if they believe it has been wrongly applied.

…

Instagram has faced criticism recently for allegedly censoring content related to the Israel-Gaza war, while also grappling with the perception the algorithm for feeds on Facebook has fuelled political polarisation across the globe.

Did not know that the British spell “fuelled” with two Ls.

You learn some new gay fact about the British every day.

]]> Sickening Homosexual Josh Hawley Gaining Support for His Mass Internet Censorship Law https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/03/05/sickening-homosexual-josh-hawley-gaining-support-for-his-mass-internet-censorship-law/ Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Previously: “Kids Online Safety Act” is Yet Another Gay Internet Censorship and Spying Program

I have no interest in knowing the details of the sickening acts of sodomy that Josh Hawley has doubtlessly engaged in with both men and young boys.

However, I can tell you: nothing Hawley has done to a young boy is as deranged as what he is now attempting to do to the internet.

KOSA is worse than a double fisting of the anus of the internet.

The way the media reports this as if it is literally about “child safety” is truly incredible.

The media just lies, you know?

New York Post:

A fresh legislative push to hold tech giants accountable for child safety is gaining momentum on Capitol Hill – as public outrage grows over online sex predators and AI-generated “deepfake” nudes whose victims have included Taylor Swift.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is among those calling for a total repeal of Section 230 – a longstanding, controversial law that shields social-media platforms from being sued for content that their users post. But industry insiders say another aggressive proposal, the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA, is the best bet to actually become law.

The bipartisan bill would impose a legal “duty of care” on tech platforms to protect minors from dangers including harassment, bullying, anxiety and sex abuse – or face enforcement action by the Federal Trade Commission.

The law should be called “BURN THE INTERNET.”

KOSA is a virtual cinch for Senate approval, with a whopping 62 senators — including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) co-sponsoring the bill as of mid-February.

In a surprise twist, smaller social media platforms X and Snap have broken ranks to support KOSA. Microsoft, which does not operate a social media platform but is facing a looming regulatory crackdown on artificial intelligence, is also in favor of the bill.

Yeah.

Because it is going to be used selectively. Obviously, no one has any ability to define what “harms the safety” of children. The Republicans were originally saying it would ban child tranny propaganda, then admitted it wouldn’t because there is no consensus that is harmful to children.

Conversely, there is surely a consensus in Washington that most memes are harmful to children.

“It’s a sign that the Kids Online Safety Act is moving,” one tech policy insider who requested anonymity told The Post. “It’s better to be on the side of kids than being seen against them in a battle they probably lost already.”

On the other side, Fight For The Future — a digital rights advocacy nonprofit — is among the critics who have claimed that KOSA could be weaponized by state attorneys general to suppress viewpoints they oppose and would essentially require the mass surveillance of online activity for underage users.

…

Sen. Blackburn, a lead sponsor for KOSA, said Section 230 reform to “protect diverse voices from big tech censorship, as well as preventing online child exploitation” was “long overdue.”

This is insane.

Censor people to protect freedom of speech?

That’s no different than “send weapons to the Ukraine and Israel to promote peace.”

These people just spew total gibberish.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), another longtime critic of the clause who pressed Zuckerberg to explain why Meta hasn’t compensated victims of online abuse, said “it is past time for people to have their day in court.”

“No one should have their videos, their images, taken and altered without their say,” said Hawley. “Victims of exploitation should be able to sue the tech companies that allow this to happen, and receive compensation. Enough is enough.”

I’ve had about enough of your sickening faggot make-up face, Josh.

No one has a “right” to prevent images of themselves from being altered. That doesn’t even make any sense. That would make virtually all memes illegal.

This is all protected under the Constitution. Josh Hawley and his co-sponsor Chucky Schumer want to do to the internet what Hawley does to the buttholes of innocent young boys. I know I already made that joke, but I might even make it a third time, because it’s true.

This bill is not only a censorship bill, it’s a mass spying bill. It looks like they want you to scan your Driver’s License to look at social media sites.

I wonder if that will result in the FBI showing up at your door to ask “what you meant” by that post about Israel?

That’s rhetorical, by the way. Of course it will. Josh Hawley knows that. He’s called for a complete shut down on all criticism of Jews, and that might be the main purpose of this, even more than the censorship.

You can’t stop them from passing this law. The only people who can stop it are big tech lobbyists, and a lot of them, as mentioned above, are on-board with it, including that yipping cocksucker Elon Musk. Remember, he talked about “verifying the identity” of posters before he even bought Twitter. For him and others, this is a mass data collection operation that just happens to line up with these other agendas.

It’s funny how the various agendas of bad actors so often line up together, no?

]]> Elon to Reinstate Twitter Account of Alex Jones After Poll https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/12/10/elon-to-reinstate-twitter-account-of-alex-jones-after-poll/ Sun, 10 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000

The people have spoken and so it shall be

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 10, 2023

“I’ll just sit here quietly waiting for my poll.” -Andrew Anglin

The Guardian:

The social media platform X will reinstate the account of the US conspiracy theorist Alex Jones after a poll of the site’s users backed his return, its owner, Elon Musk, has said.

“The people have spoken and so it shall be,” Musk posted in reply to a poll on Saturday on whether to reinstate the Jones account. Close to 2m votes were cast by the time the poll closed, with about 70% voting in favour of Jones’s return.

…

The platform formerly known as Twitter banned Jones and his website Infowars in 2018, saying that the accounts had violated its behaviour policies.

The ban came weeks after Apple, Alphabet’s YouTube, and Facebook took down podcasts and channels from Jones, citing community standards.

There’s never going to be a poll in which people vote against freedom of speech.

So the plan is clearly to not give Anglin a poll, because Anglin is the number one banned person for a reason.

The yipper Elon claims freedom of speech is meaningless if you don’t allow people you disagree with.

By the way – Anglin was apparently banned for masturbating to a picture of a guy’s wife. Although Twitter will not give the reason, that appears to have been the case.

Elon has not spoken on the rules of which pictures you are allowed to masturbate to on the site, but he allows porn, so it is absurd to suggest that no masturbation is allowed.

]]> Andrew Tate’s App Removed Because He’s a Bad Influence https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/23/apple-removes-andrew-tates-app-over-allegedly-being-mean-to-women-bad-role-model/ Sat, 23 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000

The following social media companies could face jail time or a fine of 10% revenue if they don’t remove all promotion and affiliate links for The Real World:@TeamYouTube @TikTokSupport @instagram @rumblevideo @Reddit

Please share and warn these companies! pic.twitter.com/RBe9uXV9p8

— Gadget – agent of The Matrix (@Gadget44027447) September 21, 2023

To be fair, Andrew Tate is a bad role model. He shouldn’t be censored, because no one should be censored. And obviously I agree with a lot of what he says (though the parts I agree with are all very basic).

He’s a better role model than anyone else who’s not already totally banned, I guess. At least he says women are retarded and men should have money. But he says that in the worst way, and his political stuff is very basic.

Dude is just super basic.

He’s telling guys to get rich and drive Bugattis so they can get laid. His entire schtick is that the purpose of being a man is to impress women.

And how does he advise you to get rich? By running camwhore and crypto scams.

He was a professional athlete who started a brutal camwhore business, then got into crypto scammery. I don’t really think this is a path that most people watching him could follow, even if they thought it was a good idea. And the purpose of the whole thing is to… get access to that disgusting, stinky, gooey hole that women have between their fatty ham legs.

It’s stupid. The whole thing is stupid. Just as a social phenomenon, Andrew Tate is very ridiculous, and it shows just how broken the society is that this is what young men turn to.

Look at this:


(does flaunting money and luxury sound like things that would make God happy?)

It’s materialism.

I’m the number one guy saying “men should have money.” I think it should basically be the center of your life. If we looked at it like life is a video game, getting money would be “core gameplay.” But materialism is feminine. And this guy is in no position to talk about money, since he made it in the scummiest ways imaginable.

Now, check this:

“Mommy thinks I’m a good little boy.” Literally.

Breh.

You want the money for power. You don’t want it for bobbles, and you definitely don’t want it for women’s approval. Those are the two worst reasons to want money (though the latter is significantly worse than the former) coming from the guy who got money in the worst ways imaginable.

He would be cooler if he was a bank robber and a literal rapist. Even if you didn’t endorse bank robbery and literal rape, you’d at least have to be like “yeah, dude’s hardcore and he’s ride or die and very classy.”

He could be like “nigga, u mad?” and I’d be like “yeah, them niggas mad.”

But no. He made money from pornography and then did lovey-dovey with gutter sluts. And honestly, if someone does that, then okay. But he did it, then went out and told other people to do it, like “yeah, this is really a good way to live your life, guys.”

I have to also say: censorship is a big part of this. People saw what happened to me, and this no doubt killed in the cradle a bunch of men who would have otherwise devoted their lives to being “life coach” type role models for young men. So because of censorship and the government/media life-ruining people who say anything politically incorrect, instead of healthy role models demonstrating masculinity, you get a guy who doesn’t really have anything to lose.

The Guardian:

Apple has withdrawn an app created by Andrew Tate after accusations that it encouraged misogyny and could be an illegal pyramid scheme.

Tate created the app, Real World Portal, after the closure of his “Hustler’s University”, which was an online academy for his fans, promising to assist them in making thousands of pounds while helping Tate’s videos on social media, which have been described as misogynistic, to go viral.

McCue Jury & Partners, the firm representing four British women who have accused Tate of sexual and physical assault, claimed that the app deliberately targets young men and encourages misogyny, including members of the app sharing techniques on how to control and exploit women. The firm has also claimed that there is evidence to suggest that the app is an illegal pyramid scheme, with members being charged $49.99 a month to join.

That sounds like price-gouging, not a pyramid scheme. You’re allowed to charge for an app.

But yeah, I guess if he’s paying people out through the app for spreading his videos, then it is kind of like a pyramid scheme.

Honestly, telling people they would get rich by spamming his videos is by far the funniest thing Tate ever did.

Last week, the Real World Portal app was removed from Google’s Play store after claims that it was an illegal pyramid scheme and encouraged misogyny.

On Friday night Apple also said it had removed it from its app store. It followed a letter from the legal firm asking Apple to consider whether the app was in line with its policies and whether the company was exposing itself to any corporate liability in hosting it on its platform.

Part of the letter, dated 15 September, said: “We are writing because our clients are extremely concerned that you are hosting Tate’s Real World Portal (RWP) mobile application on your Apple Store … In continuing to host RWP, not only is Apple potentially indirectly financing Tate’s alleged criminal activities but is aiding the spread of his misogynistic teachings.”

Okay, well.

Okay.

This seems a bit similar to the Russell Brand situation, where the government is telling people to ban him.

Related: Rumble Refuses to Demonetize Russell Brand Following UK Government’s Letter

But it’s hard to look at this as though something of value was lost. I don’t really see anywhere good this can go.

Russell Brand, on the other hand, is actually helping take things in a good direction. Just as a general matter. He doesn’t talk about Jews, but his materials are on point (insofar as you can be on point without talking about the Jews).

Tate said he was “breaking out of the Matrix,” then said to do scams to get rich so women will give you attention. That is literally the Matrix. The Matrix is believing your value as a man is dependent on what women think of you.

The real alpha move would be to get rich and then use your money to kill women and get away with it.

No, no, just joking. Don’t do that.

The real alpha move is to get rich and not buy a Bugatti (buy like, an F-150 Raptor), and then get a teenage bride and not let her leave the house, and then barely ever see her and don’t think about women at all.

]]> Fed Court Rules It’s Illegal for the Biden Administration to Order Social Media to Do Censorship https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/20/fed-court-rules-its-illegal-for-the-biden-administration-to-order-social-media-to-do-censorship/ Wed, 20 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000

I am pretty sure no one ever thought the government censoring speech was legal in the first place, the government was just doing it and there was no one to stop them.

So what does a court ruling saying “this obviously illegal thing you are doing is illegal” mean? Basically nothing.

It’s interesting, but that’s all.

Whatever you think of Elon Musk – and I personally think he’s a fat retard who is bad at video games and censors well-meaning people for no good reason – it was the release the the Twitter Files that allowed this to happen.

That was really the only way the government was ever going to get caught – for a billionaire to offer a deal that the board couldn’t refuse to buy Twitter and take it private, and then to publicly dump the company’s emails with the FBI. If that wouldn’t have happened, this would have just gone on forever and ever and ever.

Sadly, it is still going to go on forever. The government is no doubt still telling Facebook what to do and they don’t even have to tell Google – Google censors because they like it.

Meanwhile, the government is working to bring down or otherwise neutralize Elon Musk. They’ve now brought in the – *checks notes* – the Prime Minister of Israel to help with that project. And to play the “good cop” no less! Who would have thought! Bibi is the good cop!

Netanyahu did an interview with Musk and pumped him up as a great hero, then asked him to censor anti-Semitism “within the confines of the First Amendment.”

See: Netanyahu Asks Musk to Fight Antisemitism Within the Confines of the First Amendment

No one has any idea what that means. It’s like asking someone to float up into the sky “within the confines of gravity.” The First Amendment allows hate speech. Period. End of story. There is no ambiguity there.

Bibi should have an interpol red notice for attempting to undermine the US Constitution through espionage and sabotage.

Anyway, whether Musk is destroyed or he cracks is almost irrelevant, because Andrew Anglin and Nick Fuentes are already banned from Twitter. We’re the only two famous political commentators that matter at all, because we are the only two people who tell the whole truth, and nothing but.

We’re like Double Dragon (I’m Billy).

If the Lee Brothers didn’t exist, no one would have stopped the Black Dragons. The Black Dragons (Jews, in this analogy) would have had their way with the city, and no one would have saved Marian (Kathy Zhu, in this story, which me and Nick will have to fight over after we defeat the Black Dragon/Jews).

The game is already lost, because me and Nick are not allowed on.

Thus ruling means nothing.

The libs remain un-owned, while Elon contemplates suicide.

The media is focusing on the fact that it was illegal to censor information about the virus (hoax) and vaccine (hoax), but the censorship program, as we all know, was much bigger.

New York Post:

A federal court of appeals ruled earlier this month that the White House, surgeon general, CDC and FBI “likely violated the First Amendment” by exerting a pressure campaign on social media companies to censor COVID-19 skeptics — including Stanford epidemiologist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

“I think this ruling is akin to the second Enlightenment,” Bhattacharya told The Post. “It’s a ruling that says there’s a democracy of ideas. The issue is not whether the ideas are wrong or right. The question is who gets to control what ideas are expressed in the public square?”

The court ordered that the Biden administration and other federal agencies “shall take no actions, formal or informal, directly or indirectly” to coerce social media companies “to remove, delete, suppress or reduce” free speech.

…

“We were just acting as scientists, but almost immediately we were censored,” said Bhattacharya, director of Stanford’s Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging. “Google de-boosted us. Our Facebook page was removed. It was just a crazy time.

“The kinds of things that the federal government was telling social media companies to censor included us — along with millions of other posts from countless other people who were criticizing government COVID policy,” he added.

A New Orleans-based three-judge panel found that the federal government “likely coerced or significantly encouraged social-media platforms to moderate content” by vaguely threatening adverse regulatory consequences if social media companies did not suppress certain viewpoints on the pandemic.

…

Subsequent reporting from Elon Musk’s so-called Twitter Files — internal documents and communications released by Musk, after he bought the platform, to expose Twitter’s inner workings — revealed that Bhattachrya’s profile was being suppressed on the platform.

People should be in prison for this. This isn’t some minor infraction. Joe Biden should be impeached and then charged with sedition.

There is zero chance that this was also not happening before – in particular, against me. How did I get kicked off a domain in Rwanda (.rw), for example? Think about it. The only possible way that happened is that the State Department threatened or bribed them.

Go back and look at the history of me being censored, starting in 2017. The idea that all of these companies, which had never censored before, decided that because I made a joke about a fat woman who died, I was beyond the pale, and the entire structure of the internet had to change to punish me. This was clearly coming from the government.

Here’s the fat joke, by the way: Heather Heyer: Woman Killed in Road Rage Incident was a Fat, Childless 32-Year-Old Slut

You can go read that and see if you think it was game-changingly evil.

It obviously was not.

Obviously, I was a threat, because I was insanely popular, reaching tens or hundreds of millions of people with a very funny and very popular message, and the government decided that they could not contend with me being allowed to spread my message with impunity.

This was during the Trump Administration, by the way. So who was responsible? Who was making these calls?

Why is there no investigation?

Those are all rhetorical questions.

The government gets caught doing illegal stuff all the time. So far, nothing has ever happened as a result. They have never stopped doing illegal things because they were caught.

Remember Edward Snowden? Bulk data collection from American citizens with no warrant by the NSA? Something which everyone admitted was totally illegal?

No one went to jail and they’re still doing it to this day.

So what is even the point?

In a democracy, the government has an absolute ability to do whatever they want to you, and you have no ability to petition grievances. They just tell you to vote, knowing full well that by voting, you are giving written, legal consent for the government to do whatever they want to you. It’s a Mephistopheles type situation.

When you vote, you are entering into a blood contract with a demon, giving it authority over you.

Leaders should be ordained by God, not by mobs.

This situation is completely hopeless. Our only hope is that the US empire collapses.

We are not going to get free speech, we are not going to vote our way into a better situation.

We are very, very doomed.

Someone should have done something about this a long time ago.

]]> The Guardian Says Democracy Fails If People Have Free Access to Information https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/09/16/the-guardian-says-democracy-fails-if-people-have-free-access-to-information/ Sat, 16 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000

Okay, so…

If “democracy” can’t survive without mass internet censorship, then it seems to me that democracy is not a valid system.

The entire concept underlying modern democracy – which is universal suffrage democracy (as opposed to a traditional American-style system where only land-owners can vote) – is that every person in society, including even the blacks, are totally actualized human beings capable of absolute rationality.

If this is true – if the underlying premise of democracy is true – then obviously, these totally actualized beings can withstand any amount of “fake news,” “hate speech,” “disinformation,” and “Russian speech,” and cut to the core of the matter and make cold, hard decisions.

If the only way these citizens are capable of making decisions is if the government regulates their exposure to the free flow of information, then why on earth are they allowed to vote?

It. Does not. Make any sense.

Take your pick:

  • Either every individual is totally capable of analyzing information and drawing the most logical possible conclusions from it, or
  • Democracy is retarded.

If people are too stupid to figure out the basic facts of reality, and are like stupid babies who get confused by news stories that present conflicting ideas, then you need to stop democracy.

Hibaq Farah has another opinion, however, which is apparently more valid than my opinion, because in a democracy, diversity speaks.

Hibaq Farah

Hibaq Farah writes for The Guardian:

Social media companies are not ready to tackle misinformation during elections due to take place around the world in 2024 because of language barriers, experts warn.

Global Coalition for Tech Justice, a movement of civil society leaders and survivors of tech harms, is calling on leading big tech companies, including Google, TikTok, Meta and X, to ensure that their platforms are equipped to protect democracy and safety during votes next year.

Oh, okay.

How about you suck my dick, Hibaq? How would you like that instead?

How about instead of protecting retarded genius (fully actualized) voters from the threat of open public dialogue, you protect my dick from sun exposure by putting your mouth around it?

In 2024, 2 billion people are due to vote in more than 50 elections, including in the US, India and the EU.

In July, the coalition asked Google, Meta, X, and TikTok to establish fully resourced election action plans, at the global and country levels, for the protection of freedoms, rights and user safety during the 2024 elections. Social media companies did not respond to this request to share their plans.

Here’s an action plan for you: open your mouth, because I’m putting my penis in it.

Bitch, we have a photo of you staring at an orb.

Hibaq Farah observing a shiny orb, paralyzed with confusion

Now shut the hell up. No one cares what a woman thinks, let alone some 64 IQ east African from a bullet-riddled mud shtetl.

Normal people see your dumb, dead eyes staring at an orb in total zombie-like languorousness, and they’re like “hey, you dumb nigger bitch – you know what’s way less confusing than a shinny orb? My dick in your mouth!”

The coalition had sought details of the number of employees and contractors for each language and dialect to ensure there is expertise on national and regional context for content moderation.

Experts warn that if platforms do not have strong election action plans, it could risk the integrity of elections and the safety of citizens.

Yeah, well – it sounds like we are just going to need to close the internet, because it is impossible to have an election if people have free access to information.

See: If Fake News is a Problem for Democracy, Then Democracy is a Problem

However, Hibaq Farah’s mouth will still have free access to my penis.

Katarzyna Szymielewicz, co-founder and president of Panoptykon Foundation – a Polish NGO that monitors surveillance technology – said that big tech companies could do more to ensure that content is moderated across languages.

“This is a big challenge for large platforms to do effective moderation in different cultural contexts, and the further from English language it gets, the more complicated it is.

“Moderation of sponsored content, or organic content to eliminate political violence, misogynist content, various types of abuse are not so obvious when you just look at the language … The platforms should try harder to address this and invest a lot more in humans who can moderate more effectively.”

Szymielewicz says that big tech platforms must de-amplify disinformation and hate by making their systems safe by design by default and not just during election periods. These include measures to suppress the algorithmic reach and visibility of disinformation and hate-spreading content, groups and accounts.

You know what’s a huge challenge, Katarzyna?

Fitting my huge penis inside of your pouty and overly ripe mouth. However, if you meet this challenge, it will solve the problem of words coming out of your filthy whore mouth, and save the world a lot of trouble.

Katarzyna Szymielewicz

It will also solve the problem of Hilbaq writing articles in the Guardian, as she will need to focus all her time of figuring out how to remove my penis from your mouth, so it can be inserted into back hers.

It’s really a win-win for the entire human race.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought that’s what democracy was all about.

]]> Musk to Pay Legal Bills and Sue on Behalf of People Treated “Unfairly” for Posting on Twitter https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/08/07/musk-to-pay-legal-bills-and-sue-on-behalf-of-people-treated-unfairly-for-posting-on-twitter/ Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000

If you were unfairly treated by your employer due to posting or liking something on this platform, we will fund your legal bill.

No limit.

Please let us know.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 6, 2023


I’m sure that both Andrew Anglin and Nick Fuentes would be interested in having Elon Musk fund lawsuits against Elon Musk for how they were treated by Elon Musk.

However, he’s put this within the very narrow bounds of being treated unfairly *by your employer*. So you can’t take him up on the deal if you were treated unfairly by him for something you posted on Twitter.

The Guardian:

Elon Musk has said his X social media platform will pay the legal bills and sue on the behalf of people who have been treated “unfairly” by employers because of posting or liking something on the site formerly known as Twitter.

“If you were unfairly treated by your employer due to posting or liking something on this platform, we will fund your legal bill,” Musk said in a post on X late on Saturday, adding that there will be no limits to funding the bills.

“And we won’t just sue, it will be extremely loud and we will go after the boards of directors of the companies too,” Musk said later in response to a post about nothing changing behavior in the US faster than a threat of legal action.

Late last month, Musk said that monthly users of X reached a “new high” and shared a graph that showed the latest count at more than 540 million.

The figures came as the company is going through organizational changes and is looking to boost falling advertising revenue.

It’s gross that the media is going along with this “X” bullshit.

What a sham.

See:

]]> Jews Whine that Kanye is Back on Twitter, Despite Promises to Suck Them Off Like a Greasy House Nigger https://www.anglinarchive.com/2023/07/31/jews-whine-that-kanye-is-back-on-twitter-despite-promises-to-suck-them-off-like-a-greasy-house-nigger/ Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0000

Kanye West’s Twitter account has been unsuspended

He has reportedly promised to not post antisemitic or other hateful content pic.twitter.com/IihYXjwlI1

— Culture Crave 🍿 (@CultureCrave) July 30, 2023


The most sickening thing about this is that the filthy Jews are literally referring to Twitter as “X.”

Sorry, kikes – I’m never doing that.

I promise you.

Never in my entire life will I be calling Twitter “X.”

I will be calling Kanye “N,” however.

CNN:

Kanye West’s account has been reinstated on Twitter after an almost eight-month ban over offensive tweets.

The US rapper, known as Ye, was accused of violating the platform’s rules prohibiting incitement to violence.

He has not posted anything new since returning to the site, which owner Elon Musk has rebranded to X.

Ye’s account now shows his last post on 1 December 2022, a day before it was was suspended.

Musk said at the time that Ye had “violated our rule against incitement to violence”, and that the account would be suspended.

It came after the musician posted a series of offensive tweets – one of which appeared to show a symbol combining a swastika and the Star of David.

The suspension followed a similar ban two months earlier, when Ye was initially locked out of his Twitter and Instagram accounts after posting anti-Semitic messages in October. Both platforms removed his posts.

Kanye can rot in hell.

What an absolute nigger.

How many of us went balls to the wall for this guy, and what does he do?

He turns around and let’s some stupid white bitch control his entire life, after pledging himself to Jesus.

I was the first one out, you’ll recall.

See:

Ain’t nobody sticking with this faggot now.

He sold us out worse than Trump ever did.

Furthermore, every song he’s put out since he started sniffing that cunt’s pussy has been garbage. So he doesn’t even have that going for him anymore.

And Jews won’t ever forgive him. They will let him keep some money and keep making some money as long as he keeps on letting them ejaculate on his face. But they’re never gonna let him get back to “superstar” level, and they’ll be doing various things to sabotage him for the rest of his life.

All his real fans know he’s bitch-made.

If he was going to pussy out for the sake of a nasty pussy, he should never have gone all-in in the first place.

This nigger will be in Hell because he loved the smell of the nastiest pussy.

Bitch looking like a retarded boy tried to draw a methhead version of Betty Boop.

What a wasted opportunity.

Oh and By the Way

What does it say about Elon Musk’s “free speech” policy that he only let Kanye back on after he promised guzzle Jew semen with one of those huge 7/11 Slurpee straws?

I reckon it actually proves, once again, that his free speech claim was a hoax from the start.

I never said anything about Jews on Twitter in the first place.

I made a point not to, as everyone who followed my account knows.

I mostly talked about the Ukraine war and shilled Russian and Chinese propaganda. I made some jokes about women, which were not even very edgy.

I still don’t know why I was banned.

The same is true of Nick Fuentes (although he definitely did talk about the Jews during his brief reinstatement, nothing he said violated the “Terms of Service” as they are).

Elon should get that stupid “X” logo tattooed on his face. Then I might have a tiny bit of respect for him.

]]>