Some sickos at government child & adolescent mental health service ⁦@headspace_aus⁩ thinks high school “Respectful Relatonships” (Sex Ed) includes graphically describing to 14 year old girls that “beastiality is accepted in the LGBTQIA+ community” https://t.co/pDWAGXunz1

— Angela Jones (@angijones) April 4, 2024

This lesson is about anal, okay?

It’s not a damn animal sex lesson.

Animal sex is still against our values, maybe. At least for another few months or so.

Human Events:

A high school in Australia is under investigation by the South Australia Department for Education after it hosted an unsupervised presentation for young girls that explicitly explained bestiality as part of a sex ed lesson about LGBTQ+.

Renmark High School’s principal, Mat Evans, issued a letter of apology to parents who heard that their children left in disgust during the session on March 22 given by a third-party presenter and put on by Headspace Berri.

The apology read that the school was “taking this matter very seriously” and had “raised concerns” with the speaker from Headspace located in Berri who has been suspended from operating in government schools while the Education Department investigates, per The Advertiser.

Headspace is a foundation that allegedly takes care of young people’s mental health

Evans also stated the school had launched an internal review due to the normal procedure of “notifying parents of specific presentations was not followed.”

“I apologise unreservedly for that,” he said in the letter sent on March 25.

“I acknowledge that some of the students felt uncomfortable with this content, and there have been a number of complaints from parents,” he said.

…

He said that the internal review would “ensure that processes around such notifications, and procedures with regard to third parties attending at our school are always met in future.”

Horrified parents learned that their daughters in year 9 at the school had been pulled from their regular lessons and placed in a separate classroom with the Headspace Berri facilitators and the speaker without the supervision of a teacher. They had not been notified of the presentation or had consented to it.

“We had a teacher that told us to grab a chair and sit in front of the board, and then the Headspace people came in and then [the teacher] left, so then we’re sitting in front of a board alone with no teachers, just the Headspace people,” 14-year-old student Courtney White said, according to Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

The title slide of the presentation read “You can see queerly now. Now point in hiding.”

14-year-old Emelia Wunderberg said all the girls felt extremely “uncomfortable” as the presenter went into graphic detail about their sexuality and then showed a slide about what each component in “LGBTQIA+” meant.

“There was a slide for what the ‘plus’ means, and they just started randomly saying words that no-one knew, like bestiality,” Emelia said. “They said [the queer community] just accepts all of it, even though … isn’t it illegal?”

“We’re all just sitting there like, ‘What the hell? What are we doing here? Why are we learning about animals having sex with humans?'” she said.

“It was really disgusting, it was really uncomfortable.”

I’m sure the conservatives who have spent years trying to normalize homosexuality are really shocked to hear that “the queer community” has sex with animals.

No one else is surprised to hear that.

But do you people remember how crazy this shit got in like, 2018? When the conservatives were all saying “we, the conservatives, will protect gays from Islamic radicals”?

You still have remnant of it, in the form of proud Jewish homosexual Dave Rubin still being a popular conservative commentator. He’ll go out there and say “only the radical homosexuals want to sodomize little kids, most of us just want to men over the age of 18.”

I guarantee he’s going to do a presentation tonight on his Rumble show about how “only radical homosexuals have sex with animals.”

But this is all actually very normal for all homosexuals, and what Christians have been warning about from the beginning: it’s not actually like Will & Grace. Homosexuals are all deeply depraved, twisted sickos.

If the fact that the Australian government accidentally hired bestiality people to teach 9th graders doesn’t prove the point, there is nothing that will prove the point.

What kind of pervert sends his kids to school these days?

Just the other day I was thinking: “maybe I should start having sex with animals?”

Right on cue, a very helpful Jew came to address my concerns.

It seems, indeed, I should start having sex with animals.

New York Post:

A Princeton professor accused of “arguing for decades that we need to rethink bestiality” is again under fire for urging his social media followers to “read and ponder” a “thought provoking” journal article entitled “Zoophilia is Morally Permissible.”

Dr Peter Singer, a teacher of bioethics at the Ivy League school’s Center for Human Values since 1999, posted a link to the article on his X account — where the backlash began almost immediately.

“This piece challenges one of society’s strongest taboos and argues for the moral permissibility of some forms of sexual contact between humans and animals,” the 77-year-old prof wrote of the journal article, written under a pseudonym and published by the Journal of Controversial Ideas.

“This article offers a controversial perspective that calls for a serious and open discussion on animal ethics and sex ethics,” Singer continued. “Read and ponder.”

See, this is why I love the Jews. The address the real issues, without any need for pretense or filters.

A lot of people these days are saying things like “we should gas the Jews” and “we should wipe every single last dog-fucker kike rat off the face of the earth,” and I really disagree with these statements, because I need the moral guidance that Jews offer.

The piece, which is available online, asserts that animals can consent to sex with humans and that it may not always be a harmful experience for them.

“The case for zoophilia being permissible is fairly robust, and commonly raised objections fall flat or are insufficiently backed up,” the anonymous author of the piece declares.

“Critics of zoophilia need more than outrage, they need better arguments,” it concludes. “I suggest that the permissibility of zoophilia should now be taken as the default position, with the burden of proof belonging to its critics.”

(This is actually true under atheistic utilitarianism. If you don’t believe in God, not having sex with animals is just a backward, mindless taboo, a primitive relic of your superstitious past. Seriously, there are supposedly still “atheist right-wingers,” and I would love to see an argument against sex with consenting animals.)

Singer, who is a vegetarian, is best known for his 1975 work “Animal Liberation,” which famously argues against most animal experimentation.

One X user pointed out what they perceived to be a disparity in a scathing comment, writing: “Can’t eat them. Can f–k them.”

…

Gary Francione, a professor at Rutgers University chimed in, reminding users that Singer has “been arguing for decades that we need to rethink bestiality.”

Good thing we live in the age of reason

Francione posted a link to a 2001 essay by Singer, where he argued: “Sex with animals does not have to be cruel. Who has not been at a party disrupted by the household dog gripping the legs of a visitor and vigorously rubbing its penis against them? The host usually discourages such activities, but in private not everyone objects to being used by her or his dog in this way, and occasionally mutually satisfying activities may develop.”

…

Meanwhile, in a follow-up post on Facebook, the absurd academic insisted that he never explicitly stated he agreed with the premise of the “Zoophilia is Morally Permissible” essay.

“I didn’t write the article on the permissibility of zoophilia. It was published in the Journal of Controversial Ideas, a journal that pushes back against “cancel culture” by providing an outlet for controversial ideas, which authors can publish under a pseudonym,” he wrote, before stating that he is a founding co-editor of that journal.

I didn’t know there was a Journal of Controversial Ideas.

I would like to publish a piece called “Total Extermination of the Jews is Morally Necessary.”

When India is told they are supposed to care about the Ukraine a lot and really cry for them, it is very easy for them to say “things are tough all over.”

NEXTshark:

Four men have been arrested after one of the accused’s phones was discovered to contain a video of them gang-raping a Bengal monitor lizard at the Sahydari Tiger Reserve in Maharashthra, India.

CCTV footage from the Maharashtra Forest Department showed the four men lurking around the forest and trespassing into the Sahyadri Tiger Reserve, which was created by the Indian government in 2008 to conserve Bengal tigers.

…

Forest guards initially only caught one of the accused, while the others fled. The remaining three were later found in Hativ village in the Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra. Officials said the men came to Kolhapur’s Chandoli village from Konkan to hunt.

The four hunters have been identified as Sandeep Tukram, Pawar Mangesh, Janardhan Kamtekar and Akshay Sunil.

The case was taken to the Indian Penal Court to discuss proper legal action and charges against the four men. According to the Indian Penal Code, Section 377 states that anyone who voluntarily commits intercourse with an animal “shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.”

Life in prison is probably too kind for men who would gang-rape a lizard. These laws are probably meant to deal with men who have sex with goats.

The point is: India has a lot of problems, which Westerners can’t really imagine. So it becomes even more ridiculous when they are told they need to devote themselves to the suffering of the Ukrainians because of “our values of a democracy.”

Wow, I can’t believe it took this long to get around to canceling Hugh Hefner.

I guess the fact that he was already dead when metoo started put him low on the list.

Just to be clear: Hefner was a literal pimp, who did not disguise this fact. The Jews who run the media decided that making a pimp a celebrity was good for the goyim.

Now, the Jews are saying “oh my God, I can’t believe this guy was a pimp.”

RT:

Playboy founder Hugh Hefner may have passed on in 2017 at the age of 91, but there are still plenty of people with much to say about the man, evidenced in a new documentary in which he is accused of everything from sexual assault to bestiality.

The 10-part A&E documentary series titled ‘Secrets of Playboy’, which premieres on Monday night, features many figures from Hefner’s life, including former Playmate models, as well as ex-girlfriend Sondra Theodore, who described the infamous cigar-smoking, pajama-wearing media mogul as a “predator” who groomed young women.

Theodore herself said she began dating Hefner when he was 50 and she was 19. She said he plied her with alcohol when she was under the legal age and later introduced her to drugs.

These women went to Hefner because they were hookers. That’s why a woman goes to a brothel – she is applying for a job as a hooker.

Once again, we have women who are victims of their own decisions. It’s really incredible that women are empowered and can do everything a man can do (but better), but also, they don’t have human agency and men are responsible for all of their decisions that they decide decades later were bad decisions.

Perhaps the most shocking claim is Hefner’s supposed preference later in life for the company of animals.

“I walked in on him with my dog and I said, ‘What are you doing?’ I was shocked,” Theodore told the New York Post, claiming she caught Hefner performing a sexual act with the animal. “He made it seem like it was just a one-time thing, and that he was just goofing off. But I never left him alone with my dog again.”

Another woman claimed that adult film actress Linda Lovelace was coaxed with drugs by Hefner and other men to perform a sexual act on a dog at a party. That incident was recalled by former Playboy employee PJ Masten, who was for many years in charge of the Playmate models.

“She was drunk and drugged…They got her so messed up that they made her give the German Shepherd oral sex. You wanna talk about depravity? This is despicable,” Masten said.

Hefner also apparently had a penchant for snuff films and he was accused of filming sexual acts without consent, drugging woman and coercing them into sexual encounters.

Yeah, okay – that is obviously made up. But hey – he’s way too dead to sue.

Whatever.

This is just lurid smut for the goyim. Smut about a smut peddler.

I think Hefner, by normalizing the sexual revolution, was one of the most damaging figures in American history.

But that isn’t what is is about. Hefner is still a hero for destroying traditional sexual norms. This is just some bizarre circus sideshow thing about sex with dogs (which is also probably serving to normalize that).

Trannies are perfectly healthy and normal and this is all normal.

Don’t worry.

Utopia is just over the rainbow.

The Sun:

A paedophile has been jailed after she had cocaine-fuelled sex with an Alsatian dog.

Claire Goodier, 60, had “fantasised about it for a number of years” before carrying out the “disgusting” act, a court heard.

Goodier, of Spencer Street in Northwich, today appeared at Chester Crown Court and was jailed for 20 months.

She had previously been convicted of possessing indecent images of children, back in 2006 and 2009.

Prosecutor Paulinus Barnes told the court that she was caught when police called to on July 19, 2019, to carry out a routine check due to her being on the sex offenders register.

Cops took a laptop – which showed that Goodier had been searching for beastiality content online, reports Northwich Guardian.

Two years later, when a full search of the computer was carried out, officer discovered 31 indecent images of Goodier taking part in a sex act with an Alsatian.

Why isn’t she allowed to have sex with a dog?

Love is love.

She should be teaching school children.

This guy was having sex with dogs and storing child porn, which reinforces my claim that “pervert” is just a general category that includes anyone outside of normative heterosexuality.

The attempt to parse out various forms of sexual perversion into categories of “consent” has been an abysmal failure.

“Consent” is not a valid concept at all, let alone something capable of serving as the basis for important laws.

New York Post:

A Florida veterinarian was sentenced Friday to nearly 22 years in federal prison for recording videos of himself sexually abusing dogs and for collecting child pornography.

Prentiss Madden, 40, was hit with a total of 272 months behind bars after pleading guilty in July to child porn and animal cruelty charges, prosecutors with the US Attorney’s Office of the Southern District of Florida announced.

Prosecutors said the sicko vet made videos of himself engaged in sexual activity with dogs and shared them with other degenerates in online chats. Investigators discovered the disturbing videos, as well as chats about bestiality, on his cell phones.

Madden also accessed kiddie porn via the file-sharing software Dropbox, storing “thousands” of horrifying files on his own account, according to prosecutors. He also received child porn images and videos through online chats and social media where he frequently discussed sexually abusing children.

Homeland Security agents raided his home on Feb. 24 and found files in which Madden discussed “the sexual abuse of animals and children” as well as multiple photos and videos depicting bestiality, according to court documents.

Madden was arrested in March for recording the beastiality videos while he was the medical director of Caring Hands Animal Hospital in Aventura, local outlets reported. Videos showed some of the abuse taking place at the animal hospital, according to prosecutors.

As soon as normal perceptions of sexuality were replaced with consent theory, we entered into a death spiral of perversion.

As a reader recently noted as regards consent theory:

If a Christian is addicted to porn a priest does not say, “Well as long as he consented to subscribe to the onlyfans and receive the bath water it seems like an issue of free individuals forming contracts so I don’t see the problem. He did receive the bath water, right? Or the question is about if it was genuine, maybe? I am sorry. I do not understand!”

If a priest says, “Sometimes the shepherd needs the company of the flock,” we do not say, “Well as long as your sheep consents, I guess that’s between the sheep and the sheep’s husband.”

If a forum member marries a Jewess we do not say, “Be careful not to consent to any of her schemes!”

We say, “You did not explain that. That’s a different situation.”

“Consent” does not solve, explain, or protect anything significant. When someone says, “make sure you have consent,” you should hear it like, “If you have more than one fork use the outer one. The house girl will keep taking them away when she clears plates until you’re left with none, but you needn’t worry about that. I’m only telling you to explain the system.”

It’s no way to govern a people, lead a congregation, run a farm, or rear a child. If someone’s advocating consent as a bedrock principle they’re probably a sloppy person who thinks he’s smarter than everyone else. Someone practicing “consent” in his life as an ultimate “principle” has probably rigged the system so he can use it to excuse an evil, compulsive, and stupid behaviour like masturbating into houseplants.

We need an actual structure for our society. You can’t run a society with made up gibberish that no one even understands.

I guarantee you this guy is going to say the dogs consented, and if it wasn’t for the child porn, then he’d probably get away with it.

Of course, he can’t say the child porn was consented to, because a child can’t consent to sex. They can consent to becoming a tranny, however. And after they consent to becoming a tranny, they can consent to riding around with adult homosexuals, who might be naked, and being touched by them.

Meanwhile, a 15-year-old girl can’t consent to sex, even if she is indistinguishable from an 18-year-old, and lies about her age. She can begin consenting on her 16th birthday in most states and territories, but only if there is no money involved. Gifts might also be illegal. Also, she can’t have crossed a state line within 3 days of the sex, or it stops being consent. Only on her 18th birthday is she able to consent fully to sex, including consenting to filming herself getting BDSM gang-banged in porno.

However – and this is important – if she smokes marijuana before signing the consent forms for the porno, then she can’t consent anymore. Also, if she signs the consent forms but doesn’t know what they say, she can’t consent anymore. Then, it’s rape again.

No one has really been able to work any of that out – but to be fair, no one has actually tried.

Explanations of consent theory typically look like this:

It’s definitely not like, an academic subject.

Saying that something is “consent” is the equivalent to invoking magic. You can’t really discuss what it means, because the concept is too feeble to withstand discussion.

Cenk Wigger has argued consent theory for animals should be based on how much the animal enjoys it. Because animals can’t talk, and you can’t ask it if it consents. So as long as the animal is getting off, Cenk argues, it is consenting.

However, if that logic was then to be applied to women (who are over 18 and therefore capable of consenting to all forms of sex), the whole legal order would collapse.

Harvey Weinstein was convicted of rape based on the claim that the victim was communicating to him with eye movements and psychic messages that she wasn’t that into it (after she’d gone to his hotel room and removed her clothing). She never said “no” or “don’t,” but he was legally responsible for not interpreting her anti-consent signals.

As soon as this consent stuff came in, it was only a matter of time before your dog got raped.

We have to return to something more reasonable.

Taylor Swift should have thought twice before promoting widespread Jewish degeneracy in her music videos to sell albums. It was not a very smart career move by the obese childless whore.

Taylor Swift, the fat childless slut and psychotic feminist, is truly seeing a decline in her music career. Even though her new album debuted at the top position of the Billboard album chart a few weeks ago, this was largely because of her name recognition and a number of merchandising gimmicks employed by her record company.

But the sales of her new album were nowhere near as strong as her previous effort. This was no doubt due to the highly offensive and disturbing content placed in her music videos. The overtly obscene material caused a great deal of outrage among Americans.

Take in point the music video for her song “Lover.” In this disgusting display of degeneracy, she promotes the idea that it is perfectly proper for young White women to have sex with monkeys. The vast majority of Americans do not support bestiality and for her to promote bestiality was of great offense to many.

And in another recently released music video for her song “You Need to Calm Down,” she openly promotes the virtues of man-on-man anal sex . Like the music video for “Lover,” this caused outrage among the American people. That’s because Americans do not believe that a man invading another man’s asshole for the purposes of sexual gratification is a healthy thing. Hence why anti-sodomy laws were put into place many years ago.

Hilariously, Swift was even criticized by actual faggots for jumping on the pro-faggot bandwagon too late. So ultimately, she made everybody angry with her chicanery.

The good news is that the sales for Swift’s album have been short lived. She is poised to lose the top position on Billboard’s album chart to Tool, a rock band who just put out their first album in 13 years. And unlike Swift, Tool employed no stupid gimmicks to get people to buy their music.

Loudwire:

Watch out, Taylor Swift fans — Tool are coming for the top of the chart. Their brand new album Fear Inoculum just came out last Friday (Aug. 30) and is likely to debut at No. 1 on the Billboard 200, according to Hits Daily Double.

The album is projected to reach between 240,000 and 260,000 albums in the U.S. alone for its first week sales, with 220,000 to 240,000 being actual sales. That’s also without the help of any sort of tour bundle or any direct-to-consumer marketing strategies.

Not to toot the Tool horn or anything, but that’s pretty impressive for a seven track, 85-minute long album.

Swift’s Lover came out Aug. 23, and debuted at No. 1 with just over 885,000 sales in its first week. Swift, however, employed a plethora of bundle options for the albums, pairing it with merchandise and concert tickets, and even a deluxe edition that comes with four discs. The pop artist’s second week sales are on pace to reach between 185,000 and 200,000, which would place Tool at the top of the chart.

It is good to see that a more wholesome and family friendly act like Tool is set to outsell the depraved and evil skank Swift.

Unlike Swift, Tool is not promoting bestiality and homosexual activity in music videos to shill their new album. They are not attempting to corrupt our youth like Swift so obviously is.

And speaking of Tool’s new album, it has received extremely positive reviews. I personally found their new album to be excellent and well worth the 13 year wait.

I am however somewhat biased as I’ve been a fan of their music since their releases of Opiate and Undertow in the 1990s.

But I’ll let you be the judge.

Here’s a few tracks from their new album.

The Holocaust is THE defining topic of mankind. If extraterrestrial life forms ever come to visit the planet, we’ll give them pamphlets to inform them about the horrors of the Holocaust and DVDs with movies like this one.

In fact, we’ll go ahead and put up a big space sign close to the Moon reading “Welcome to Earth! (The Holocaust happened here).”

Yahoo:

A searing adaptation of one of most controversial books about the Holocaust divided critics at the Venice film festival Wednesday, with some fighting each other in the dark to get out of its first screening.

“The Painted Bird”, based on Jerzy Kosinski’s highly contentious 1965 novel about a Jewish boy surviving the worst human nature can inflict on him in an unnamed Eastern European country, was hailed as a masterpiece by some and an unwatchable ordeal by others.

But its staggering central performance from nine-year-old Czech Roma boy Petr Kotlar — who witnesses a panoply of depravity from incest, bestiality and rape to mutilation and murder — has had co-stars Harvey Keitel and Stellan Skarsgard as well as the critics in raptures.

That did not stop some running for the exits at its first screening.

If anyone calls a film featuring incest, bestiality and rape “an unwatchable ordeal” then you can be pretty sure that person is a Nazi.

Any good goy will suffer in the name of understanding what the Jews went through.

In the very first scene, the boy’s pet ferret is taken from him by boorish peasants and burned alive.

The Hollywood Reporter called the black-and-white epic “heart-wrenching… and the ideal film treatment” of the novel, which itself sparked outrage in Kosinski’s native Poland when the writer first hinted that the story was autobiographical.

The Guardian’s Xan Brooks also heaped praise on Czech director Vaclav Marhoul for “never putting a foot wrong”, adding: “One day they’ll make a film about the first public screening” at Venice.

…

Deborah Young of The Hollywood Reporter also hailed it, but warned that it was an “emotional three-hour punch in the stomach“.

Marhoul defended the unremitting darkness of his adaptation — which has a happy ending, of sorts — insisting that “only in darkness can we see light. Shining through all the horrors is, for me, hope and love.”

So the Holocaust was a good thing, then. Thanks to it, Jews saw light and found hope and love.

Wait — actually, no, because it didn’t ever happen. But if it did happen, the Jews would enjoy being Holocausted. It is clear that the Holocaust is to Jews what 50 Shades of Gray is to women. 50 Lampshades of Gray.

He said the film was a warning of what can happen when Europe turns inward as it was doing now, drawing a parallel between the attitudes to migrant children fleeing wars in Syria, Libya and Afghanistan and the rejection and abuse his hero suffers.

…

“Bad times are coming to Europe,” he told reporters.

“Looking at the populists who are running so many European countries at the moment like Hungary, Poland, Russia, in the Czech Republic too and of course the US.”

People not wanting random browns to invade their country or to pay for the mistakes of browns are literally Nazi Germany.

Because of the fury Kosinski sparked in Poland, the director decided to have most of the film’s sparse dialogue in Slavic Esperanto “so no nation would be associated with villagers” who mistreat the boy and hand him over to the Nazis.

Despite being accused of plagiarising other Polish books, Kosinski’s novel is still seen by many as a classic.

“When Kosinski said it was his autobiographical story he was lying,” Marhoul said.

“In fact he spent the World War II with his parents among Polish villagers. And those villagers tried to save them… That’s not a big problem for the book (because it is fiction). But many people in Poland still think this book is about them.”

Yeah, it doesn’t matter what actually happened in what we call “reality.” What matters is that these things are real in the minds of the Jews.

These are their fantasies.

Thinking about the Holocaust gets their juices flowing. It is their obsession. They can’t stop talking about it. They can’t stop thinking about it.

They want it.

They NEED it.

They are BEGGING for it.

They don’t hate Hitler for Holocausting them, they hate Hitler for refusing to Holocaust them.

[WARNING: SOME MAY FIND THESE IMAGES DISTRESSING]

Meet Mohammed. Mohammed is an Algerian illegal immigrant living in Vittoria, Siciily. He likes to torture animals. In this video he approaches a group of stray dogs that live outside a petrol station. Most of them run away when he comes. One dog, Nerina, stays. Mohammed then sodomises Nerina with an iron bar. Nerina dies an agonising death not long afterwards.

The corpse of Nerina

Last September, the Italian anti-immigration site Vox published an article about this incident.

Now Vox has received a notice from Google saying that links to this article have been removed from its search results following a complaint about violation of privacy.

This can only have come from the perpetrator himself, who was named in the article only as Mohammed, with no surname given.

It’s bizarre and disturbing that the EU’s “Right to be Forgotten” can be invoked by illegal immigrants to conceal news reports about their own atrocities.

So is “migrants gang-rape dog to death” the point at which this argument of “they act badly because of a lack of education” stops forever?

Because they use this “they gang-raped women because they weren’t educated” line, and I guess when they do that they are referencing sex-ed class in middle school and high school. I don’t really remember sex-ed class, but I guess in the high school version, they make a big thing about consent. So they are arguing that because the migrants didn’t get that, they don’t know that sex is supposed to be consensual, and think gang-rape is a socially appropriate behavior.

But I’m just going to tell you right now: at no point in my sexual education curriculum was there any lesson about “why you’re not supposed to have sex with animals.” In fact, I am 100% sure that the concept of humans having sex with animals was never, ever brought up at any point in my education.

Because apparently, it was simply assumed that human beings are instinctively aware that they are not supposed to have sex with animals.

So then what is going on with these migrants then, Jews?

What is the deal?

Are you going to tell us they need to be educated to not gang-rape dogs to death – and then they’ll start working in high-tech industry?

What in the fuck is going on? 

Voice of Europe:

According to the Greek animal welfare webpage Zoosos, on 28th of March 2018 an outrageous denouncement was filed to the Perama police department in Athens, by the staff taking care of stray dogs living in the nearby refugee camp of Skaramagka.

The staff found a little female dog dead at the centre of the camp, covered with a blanket. The little dog had obvious signs of a brutal rape on her genitals, but no other external trauma.

The body of the dog was transferred to the Stray Animal Care Interdisciplinary Center of Athens in order to be medically examined and to determine the exact cause of the animal’s death.

According to Zoosos, the head of the refugee camp of Skaramagka, Mr. Giorgos Karoglou, has confirmed this incident.

Webpage Eksegersi Ellinon, reports that the Greek PM Mr Giannis Lagos, of the Greek Nationalist Golden Dawn party, filed a question to the responsible Minister of Justice and the Minister of the Interior, in which he asked to be informed about the exact cause of death of the dog.

He furthermore demands justice to be delivered to the perpetrators as soon as possible. Although the ministers are obliged to answer within 25 days according to the Hellenic Parliament’s Rules, almost two months have passed from the date that the question of Mr Lagos was filed.

The two ministers have not answered his question, of which we received official copies, so far.

When is enough going to be enough?

This poor little innocent dog was GANG-RAPED TO DEATH.

What fucked up thing do these animals have to do in order for people to look at them and say “THESE ARE FUCKING ANIMALS AND WE DO NOT WANT THEM IN OUR COUNTRIES”?

It’s just… it’s almost too much to even process.

Remember who called these people in.

Remember it next time a woman tells you fucking anything about fucking anything.

These fucking whores deserve to be raped – not some innocent little doggo.

Women are evil.

Period.

They are agents of the demiurge, which exist for us to overcome. They are living, but they do not have souls, and our duty as men is to keep them in line. To be challenged by them, to meet that challenge and prove we can use these monstrous beings to reproduce our offspring.

You need to understand this.

Whenever you interact with them.

They belong to us as property. They are to serve us.

You don’t have to “hate” them – in fact, that is stupid. Hating women is like hating a forest fire. They are an evil force of destruction, but a purely natural phenomenon. Hating a natural phenomenon is not logical, and you should not engage in excessively emotional, illogical behavior.

Instead, you should view them as soulless animals which exist only to serve you, and if they are not serving you, they are feral, and thus they are in need of being tamed or discarded.

Western women are feral animals.

They are dangerous and satanic.

Their behavior leads to this:

Beware. 

Never trust them. Any of them. Never, ever let your guard down or show weakness.

Never.

No matter how good you think she is, she will turn on you and eat your flesh as soon as she thinks she can get away with it.

And yes: I am talking about all women.

Every.

Single.

Fucking.

One.