You can’t really be against Mussolini. He didn’t do any kind of alleged “Holocaust.”

So what is he even being blamed for, exactly?

Being a good leader with good aesthetics?

RT:

The president of the European Parliament, Antonio Tajani, was again branded a secret fascist sympathizer after saying the government of Benito Mussolini did some good things for Italy.

The Italian EU politician offered some cautious praise to the policies of the notorious dictator and ally of Adolf Hitler during World War II when he appeared on a popular Radio 24 news show. Tajani acknowledged that Mussolini did a lot of terrible things – from joining forces with Nazi Germany, which was a suicidal move for Italy, to imposing anti-Jewish racial laws, to possibly being behind the assassination of his political opponent, Giacomo Matteotti, who was killed by members of the fascist secret police.

But, “he did positive things to realize infrastructures in our country,” Tajani said.

“One must be objective. I’m not a fascist, I have never been a fascist and I don’t share his political thought, but if we must be honest, he built roads, bridges, buildings… he reclaimed many parts of our Italy.”

Despite the hemming and hawing, many were angered by his words, including fellow EU officials. Some said he is secretly exactly what he said he is not – a fascist sympathizer.

Some people on Twitter.

In English.

Mussolini, he may be responsible for 430,000+ murders but hey check out his roads and bridges! 🤷‍️
Seriously this is the President of the EU Parliament & member of @FineGael 's group @EPPGrouphttps://t.co/xEeMczS9IJ

— Lynn Boylan MEP (@LNBDublin) March 13, 2019

Oh so now any death in war is “murder”?

Better not tell that to all the ZOG shills in the Trump Administration.

Millions of people have died in the bizarre wars of aggression against Moslems since 911.

And Blormpf is hiring these people to go slaughter people in South America.

If this is murder – then that doesn’t bode well for MIGA.

Unbelievable quotes from Tajani on #Mussolini. How can a President of the European Parliament fail to acknowledge the nature of fascism? We need swift clarification.

— Udo Bullmann (@UdoBullmann) March 13, 2019

The “nature” of it is what? A healthy country?

Antifascism is fundamental to the European Union.

With his comments about Mussolini, Antonio Tajani has again proven that he is not fit to be the President of the European Parliament.

He should take them back or resign. https://t.co/Ha7M46ngNs

— Terry Reintke (@TerryReintke) March 14, 2019

Injecting little boys with hormones and cutting their dicks off is fundamental to the European Union. Flooding Europe with the genetic waste of the entire earth is fundamental to the European Union. Women being tricked into not having children is fundamental to the European Union. Provoking a world war with Russia is fundamental to the European Union.

I can’t think of anything good that the European Union isn’t against.

A shocking statement from @EP_President today that Italian dictator Mussolini "did positive things also like buildings & infrastructure apart from the war & the alliance with Hitler…" #NoPasaran https://t.co/ZA4NnkNkbm #farright #fascismo pic.twitter.com/fXNSaqoEQF

— The Left in the European Parliament (@GUENGL) March 13, 2019

This is pretty outrageous: Antonio Tajani, president of the European Parliament, praising Mussolini for "building roads, bridges, buildings." https://t.co/lzXRVPJsNe pic.twitter.com/NzTA7swZBB

— Andrew Stroehlein (@astroehlein) March 14, 2019

Shameful!
How is it possible to have a president praising Mussolini?! #TajaniResign @EP_President
👇👇👇👇 https://t.co/AdqpYtVfQV

— Ramon Tremosa 🎗🌹 (@ramontremosa) March 14, 2019

WOW JUST WOW I CAN’T EVEN.

Shut up, you faggots.

Mussolini did nothing wrong, even if you believe in that stupid lampshades and soap hoax!

Italy is the one country in Europe that is going in the right direction.

I harbor hope.

Tanti nemici, tanto onore! 😘 https://t.co/NdFjsSkZLw

— Matteo Salvini (@matteosalvinimi) July 29, 2018

Italians, you see, don’t have this whole bullshit with the fake outrage and state-enforced guilt over Mussolini like the Germans have over Hitler.

They can joke about it.

Especially Salvini can joke about it.

Except he isn’t joking.

CNN:

Populist Italian Interior Minister Matteo Salvini made a veiled reference to the late fascist dictator Benito Mussolini on Sunday.

Salvini tweeted “tanti nemici, tanto onore,” meaning “so many enemies, so much honor,” a variation on Mussolini’s famous “molti nemici, molto onore,” or “many enemies, much honor.” He tweeted the comments on the anniversary of Mussolini’s birth.

Salvini’s tweet came in response to a magazine article about Salvini’s critics, including the Catholic Church and leading left-wing intellectuals, and his coinciding rise in popularity.

He will be Caesar.

It is destiny itself.

He also had some good things to say about the birthrate.

Separately, in an interview with the UK’s Sunday Times newspaper, Salvini, from the right-wing League party, said Italy’s low birth rate is being used as an excuse to “import immigrants.”

“A country which does not create children is destined to die,” he said. “We have created a ministry of the family to work on fertility, nurseries, on a fiscal system which takes large families into account. At the end of this mandate, the government will be measured on the number of newborns more than on its public debt.”

He said that Italy’s “tradition, our story, our identity,” was at stake as the left uses the fertility crisis as an “excuse” to “import migrants”.

You know you’re doing something right when the SJW Anti-Pope (Satan) is calling you evil.

Last week the leading Roman Catholic weekly Famiglia Cristiana called Salvini the devil in a blistering critique of the interior minister’s migration proposals.

The magazine ran a front cover with a Latin headline: “Vade retro, Salvini,” a play on Jesus’ words: “Get behind me, Satan.”

And he is doing everything right.

The times, they are a changing.

Salvini loves Trump and Putin.

In the interview with the Sunday Times, Salvini expressed admiration for both US President Donald Trump and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, saying Trump was “brave” in his election campaign and has been “consistent” since entering the White House. He said Putin’s economic policies have filled the Russian people with “pride.”

As soon as Salvini assumes the throne, and Trump and Putin work things out – they have already worked things out, now they just need to work around the evil American government – we are going to have Merkel and Macron surrounded.

Canada as well.

The Italians have done their own take on the German “He’s Back” film that showed Hitler returning to the modern world. “Sono tornato” [I’m Back] adopts the same light-hearted tone. But the director thinks Mussolini could really win an election in modern Italy.

Just as the right is moving forward, Benito Mussolini is appearing in Italian cinemas in the satire movie I’m Back, which imagines the dictator returning to the Italy of 2018. “The Italians, unlike the Germans, never dealt with their dictator, they have never removed him,” said the director Luca Maniero. “Watching what is happening, today, in our country, I am convinced that if Mussolini came back, he would win the election.’’

Source

The most interesting parts of the trailer are when people in the street spontaneously give the Roman salute on seeing “Mussolini” pass by.

It is actually not implausible that Mussolini could win. Polls show a massive hardening of opinion on the question of immigration. La Stampa recently reported that 65% of people aged between 18 and 35 want immigration either stopped completely or drastically limited. “Even the centre-left voters are now afraid of immigrants,” it said.

In some photographs, Luca Traini actually bears a striking resemblance to Mussolini. He also looks a bit like Marlon Brando playing Colonel Kurtz in Apocalypse Now.

An Italian speaking to their minister seems to be justifiably angry at Italy’s migrant policy.

The Italians (and pretty much the entire EU west of Poland) give ‘refugees’ free everything forever because they are brown while throwing their own people into the gutter.

Germany is also especially bad for this.

These policies will soon lead to the economic destruction of the native Whites.

I seem to recall a time when something similar happened in Europe where native citizens were thrown into poverty while all their nations wealth was shipped elsewhere.

Soon.

How can anybody be a fan of Benito Mussolini? He was friends with Adolf Hitler, a mad man who personally stuffed 60 trillion Jews inside wooden ovens disguised as shower rooms.

It is good to see that the Italian government has their priorities straight. The police have been given unlimited resources to go after evil pro-fascist beach clubs fond of Benito Mussolini.

Daily Mail:

The Italian government has ordered the removal of pro-fascist posters at a beach near Venice.

The order was issued today by the prefect based in Venice after photos of Benito Mussolini were seen displayed at the Punta Canna resort in Chioggia.

Italian law forbids the glorification of fascism.

According to Ansa, the Italian news agency, there was concern that public order could be disturbed by the signs and photos.

One of the signs said the area was in an ‘anti-democratic’ zone while photos of former dictator Mussloini were also on display.

While Rome daily La Repubblica said that pro-Mussolini speeches were blasted over the beach’s loudspeaker by a self proclaimed private fascist beach club.

Yes, public order would most definitely be disturbed by these signs and photos of Mussolini. That’s because other than Adolf Hitler, Mussolini was the most evil man to ever live. Can you imagine all the hurt feelings these signs and photos cause?

On the other hand, public order is not disturbed by the infinite number of low IQ Negroes that are being shipped in from Africa. They will be taking engineering jobs and paying for everyone’s pensions. Despite claims from White supremacists, Africans are definitely far less of a threat to public order than pro-fascist signs and photos of Mussolini.

The Italian government is definitely doing what’s best for the people.

Great job guys! Keep up the good work!

I posted this gif (that’s “GIF,” Morrakiu, not “JIF,” which is a poisonous cheap “peanut butter” made of sugar and partially-hydrogenated soybean oil) yesterday.

It is a really fun example of the issue of the way Northern and Southern Europeans differ as far as their comfort levels with touchy-feelines between men.

Hitler literally pushes Mussolini back, while laughing uncomfortably – “you’re getting a little bit too close there, pal.”

I’ve experienced this six million times myself.

Really hard to deal with, because Southern Europeans actually take serious offense if you’re like “can you please stop touching me, it’s making me uncomfortable.” Or if you even signal something to this effect, like Hitler is doing in the gif.

They even take offense – which at one age, I was stupid enough to try and do – if you just try to explain in detail that you come from a different culture and if your culture men stand further apart and only touch each other on the back or shoulder either as a pat or as a 3-second touch that does not involve any form of rubbing or squeezing motion.

Basically, if you go to Southern or Eastern Europe, just be ready for this, and just deal with it. There is nothing gay or even slightly gay about it, and I think a part of why they are comfortable with it is because they have fewer gays in their culture (though that doesn’t explain why it was the case in this 1930s gif, so maybe that doesn’t have anything to do with it).

Also, if you’re sitting down at a table, try to position yourself across from them as much as possible, because they will touch your legs, which for me as an Anglo, is the absolute worst.

Also, if there are any Southern/Eastern Euros reading this, please understand that we are not rude or cold people, we are just totally not at all used to this.

Also, understand that if we look uncomfortable after you tell a dirty joke, it isn’t because we are prudes or don’t think it’s funny, it’s just because we’re not used to people talking or laughing that loudly in public.

Benito Mussolini waged an unrelenting war on the conspiratorial, Jew-serving universalist cult of Freemasony, and succeeded for a time in freeing his beloved Italy from their poisonous presence while he was in power. Below is a passage from his autobiography My Rise, in which he speaks of this:

Let us not forget that the Masons of Italy have always represented a distortion, not only in political life, but in spiritual concepts. All the strength of Masonry was directed against the papal policies, but this struggle represented no real and profound ideal. The secret society from a practical point of view rested on an association of mutual adulation, of reciprocal aid, of pernicious nepotism and favoritism. To become powerful and to consummate its underhanded dealings, Masonry made use of the weaknesses of the Liberal governments that succeeded each other in Italy after 1870 to extend its machinations in the bureaucracy, in the magistracy, in the field of education, and also in the army, so that it could dominate the vital ganglions of the whole nation. Its secret character throughout the twentieth century, its mysterious meetings, abhorrent to our beautiful communities with their sunlight and their love of truth, gave to the sect the character of corruption, a crooked concept of life, without programme, without soul, without moral value.

My antipathy for that disgusting form of secret association goes back to my youth. Long before, at the Socialist congress of Ancona in 1914, I had presented to my comrades the dilemma: Socialists or Masons? That point of view had won a complete triumph, in spite of the strong opposition of the Mason-socialists.

Later, in Fascism, I made the same gesture of strength. It took courage. I obeyed the positive command of my conscience, and not any opportunism. My attitude had nothing in common with the anti-Masonic spirit of the Jesuits. They acted for reasons of defense. After all, their inner organization as a religious society is almost completely unknown.

For my direct, methodical and consistent course of policy the hate of the Masonic sect persecutes me even now. Masonry of that type has been beaten in Italy, but it operates and conspires behind mask of the international anti-Fascism. It utterly fails to defeat me. It tries to throw mud at me, but the insult does not reach its mark. It machinates plots and crimes, but the hired assassins do not control my destiny. It goes gossiping about my weaknesses, and the supposed organic afflictions of my body, but I am more alive and stronger than ever

This is a war without quarter, a war of which I am a veteran. Every time that I have wanted to cauterize difficult situations in Kalian political life, every time that I have wanted to give a sincere, frank and loyal moral rectitude to the personnel in politics, I have always had against me our Masonry! But that organization, which in other times was very powerful, has been beaten by me. Against me it did not and cannot win. Italians won this battle for me. They found the cure for this leprosy.

To-day in Italy we breathe the open air; life is exposed to the light of day.

If I advance, follow me;
if I retreat, kill me;
if I die, avenge me!
It is better to live one day as a lion than a hundred years as a sheep!– Benito Mussolini

1. Like every sound political conception, Fascism is both practice and thought; action in which a doctrine is immanent, and a doctrine which, arising out of a given system of historical forces, remains embedded in them and works there from within. Hence it has a form correlative to the contingencies of place and time, but it has also a content of thought which raises it to a formula of truth in the higher level of the history of thought. In the world one does not act spiritually as a human will dominating other wills without a conception of the transient and particular reality under which it is necessary to act, and of the permanent and universal reality in which the first has its being and its life. In order to know men it is necessary to know man; and in order to know man it is necessary to know reality and its laws. There is no concept of the State which is not fundamentally a concept of life: philosophy or intuition, a system of ideas which develops logically or is gathered up into a vision or into a faith, but which is always, at least virtually, an organic conception of the world.

2. Thus Fascism could not be understood in many of its practical manifestations as a party organization, as a system of education, as a discipline, if it were not always looked at in the light of its whole way of conceiving in a spiritual way. The world seen through Fascism is not this material world which appears on the surface, in which man is an individual separated from all others and standing by himself, and in which he is governed by a natural law that makes him instinctively live a life of selfish and momentary pleasure. The man of Fascism is an individual who is nation and fatherland, which is a moral law, binding together individuals and the generations into a tradition and a mission, suppressing the instinct for a life enclosed within the brief round of pleasure in order to restore within duty a higher life free from the limits of time and space: a life in which the individual, through the denial of himself, through the sacrifice of his own private interests, through death itself, realizes that completely spiritual existence in which his value as a man lies.

3. Therefore it is a spiritual conception, itself the result of the general reaction of modern times against the flabby materialistic positivism of the nineteenth century. Anti-positivistic, but positive: not skeptical, nor agnostic, nor pessimistic, nor passively optimistic, as are, in general, the doctrines (all negative) that put the center of life outside man, who with his free will can and must create his own world. Fascism desires an active man, one engaged in activity with all his energies: it desires a man virilely conscious of the difficulties that exist in action and ready to face them. It conceives of life as a struggle, considering that it behooves man to conquer for himself that life truly worthy of him, creating first of all in himself the instrument (physical, moral, intellectual) in order to construct it. Thus for the single individual, thus for the nation, thus for humanity. Hence the high value of culture in all its forms (art, religion, science), and the enormous importance of education. Hence also the essential value of work with which man conquers nature and creates the human world (economic, political, moral, intellectual).

4. This — positive conception of life is clearly an ethical conception. It covers the whole of reality, not merely the human activity which controls it. No action can be divorced from moral judgment; there is nothing in the world which can be deprived of the value which belongs to everything in its relation to moral ends. Life, therefore, as conceived by the Fascist, is serious, austere, religious: the whole of it is poised in a world supported by the moral and responsible forces of the spirit. The Fascist disdains the “comfortable” life.

5. Fascism is a religious conception in which man is seen in his immanent relationship with a superior law and with an objective Will that transcends the particular individual and raises him to conscious membership of a spiritual society. Whoever has seen in the religious politics of the Fascist regime nothing but mere opportunism has not understood that Fascism besides being a system of government is also, and above all, a system of thought.

6. Fascism is an historical conception, in which man is what he is only in so far as he works with the spiritual process in which he finds himself, in the family or social group, in the nation and in the history in which all nations collaborate. From this follows the great value of tradition, in memories, in language, in customs, in the standards of social life. Outside history man is nothing. Consequently Fascism is opposed to all the individualistic abstractions of a materialistic nature like those of the eighteenth century; and it is opposed to all Jacobin utopias and innovations. It does not consider that “happiness” is possible upon earth, as it appeared to be in the desire of the economic literature of the eighteenth century, and hence it rejects all teleological theories according to which mankind would reach a definitive stabilized condition at a certain period in history. This implies putting oneself outside history and life, which is a continual change and coming to be. Politically, Fascism wishes to be a realistic doctrine; practically, it aspires to solve only the problems which arise historically of themselves and that of themselves find or suggest their own solution. To act among men, as to act in the natural world, it is necessary to enter into the process of reality and to master the already operating forces.

7. Against individualism, the Fascist conception is for the State; and it is for the individual in so far as he coincides with the State, which is the conscience and universal will of man in his historical existence. It is opposed to classical Liberalism, which arose from the necessity of reacting against absolutism, and which brought its historical purpose to an end when the State was transformed into the conscience and will of the people. Liberalism denied the State in the interests of the particular individual; Fascism reaffirms the State as the true reality of the individual. And if liberty is to be the attribute of the real man, and not of that abstract puppet envisaged by individualistic Liberalism, Fascism is for liberty. And for the only liberty which can be a real thing, the liberty of the State and of the individual within the State. Therefore, for the Fascist, everything is in the State, and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value, outside the State. In this sense Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State, the synthesis and unity of all values, interprets, develops and gives strength to the whole life of the people.

8. Outside the State there can be neither individuals nor groups (political parties, associations, syndicates, classes). Therefore Fascism is opposed to Socialism, which confines the movement of history within the class struggle and ignores the unity of classes established in one economic and moral reality in the State; and analogously it is opposed to class syndicalism. Fascism recognizes the real exigencies for which the socialist and syndicalist movement arose, but while recognizing them wishes to bring them under the control of the State and give them a purpose within the corporate system of interests reconciled within the unity of the State.

9. Individuals form classes according to the similarity of their interests, they form syndicates according to differentiated economic activities within these interests; but they form first, and above all, the State, which is not to be thought of numerically as the sum-total of individuals forming the majority of a nation. And consequently Fascism is opposed to Democracy, which equates the nation to the majority, lowering it to the level of that majority; nevertheless it is the purest form of democracy if the nation is conceived, as it should be, qualitatively and not quantitatively, as the most powerful idea (most powerful because most moral, most coherent, most true) which acts within the nation as the conscience and the will of a few, even of One, which ideal tends to become active within the conscience and the will of all; that is to say, of all those who rightly constitute a nation by reason of nature, history or race, and have set out upon the same line of development and spiritual formation as one conscience and one sole will. Not a race, nor a geographically determined region, but as a community historically perpetuating itself, a multitude unified by a single idea, which is the will to existence and to power: consciousness of itself, personality.

10. This higher personality is truly the nation in so far as it is the State. It is not the nation that generates the State, as according to the old naturalistic concept which served as the basis of the political theories of the national States of the nineteenth century. Rather the nation is created by the State, which gives to the people, conscious of its own moral unity, a will and therefore an effective existence. The right of a nation to independence derives not from a literary and ideal consciousness of its own being, still less from a more or less unconscious and inert acceptance of a de facto situation, but from an active consciousness, from a political will in action and ready to demonstrate its own rights: that is to say, from a state already coming into being. The State, in fact, as the universal ethical will, is the creator of right.

11. The nation as the State is an ethical reality which exists and lives in so far as it develops. To arrest its development is to kill it. Therefore the State is not only the authority which governs and gives the form of laws and the value of spiritual life to the wills of individuals, but it is also a power that makes its will felt abroad, making it known and respected; in other words, demonstrating the fact of its universality in all the necessary directions of its development. It is consequently organization and expansion, at least virtually. Thus it can be likened to the human will which knows no limits to its development and realizes itself in testing its own limitlessness.

12. The Fascist State, the highest and most powerful form of personality, is a force, but a spiritual force, which takes over all the forms of the moral and intellectual life of man. It cannot therefore confine itself simply to the functions of order and supervision as Liberalism desired. It is not simply a mechanism which limits the sphere of the supposed liberties of the individual. It is the form, the inner standard and the discipline of the whole person; it saturates the will as well as the intelligence. Its principle, the central inspiration of the human personality living in the civil community, pierces into the depths and makes its home in the heart of the man of action as well as of the thinker, of the artist as well as of the scientist: it is the soul of the soul.

13. Fascism, in short, is not only the giver of laws and the founder of institutions, but the educator and promoter of spiritual life. It wants to remake, not the forms of human life, but its content, man, character, faith. And to this end it requires discipline and authority that can enter into the spirits of men and there govern unopposed. Its sign, therefore, is the Lectors’ rods, the symbol of unity, of strength and justice.