Pacifism strikes the Zio-Empire!

Yes, it sounds odd. But basically, Western pacifism and weak liberal democracy has paved the way for a malnourished and operatively ineffective NATO. At least in the East around Russia’s borders.

We might have to thank those stinking hippies that brought everything else down – at least they brought down the ZOG war machine down with it!

The RAND corporation has released results of simulations showing that the decades of budget cuts on Western military forces now put NATO in an awkward position if they actually face Russian ground forces, where they would not be able to mount defenses for any substantial amount of time should the Kremlin choose to invade the Baltic countries.

Of course such a scenario is the typical war-mongering propaganda to confuse the standard goy and make them fight each other; nonetheless the results of the simulations are making the Jew sweat.

And that, of course, is good.

Der Spiegel:

Several weeks ago, the California-based game theorists released another study that received a fair amount of attention. Financed by the Pentagon, they created a series of simulations for a hypothetical Russian invasion of the two Baltic states of Estonia and Latvia.

“The outcome was, bluntly, a disaster for NATO,” the RAND researchers wrote in their report. In each simulation, the Russians were able to either circumvent the outnumbered NATO units, or even worse, destroy them. Between 36 and 60 hours after the beginning of hostilities, Russian troops stood before the gates of Riga or Tallinn — or both.

The RAND simulation triggered heated debate. In an article headlined “How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love NATO’s Crushing Defeat by Russia,” American military expert Michael Kofman questioned strategic parameters used in the simulations. “No one can intelligently articulate the benefits of such potential actions for the Russians,” he wrote.

But alas, Jewry intensifies in their attempts to topple the largest nation on Earth threatening their Agenda. Of course, it is good that they now encourage more military spending again.

That will keep the forces in good condition until the next European Führer arrives to command them.

At the NATO summit in Warsaw in early July, leaders of NATO member states will discard their policy of “trust” and recommit to a policy of “deterrence.” Just like before.

…

The Americans in particular are putting pressure on the Europeans to once again invest more significantly in their own defense. In March, US President Barack Obama complained about the European “free riders” who are profiting from American protection while refusing to take on their “fair share.”

Since then, numerous NATO states have announced that they intend to once again invest more money in defense. Fifteen of the 28 member states have increased their military spending, especially in countries on the NATO’s eastern flank that feel most threatened by Moscow. The Czech Republic raised its defense budget by 6 percent, Slovakia by 17 percent, the small state of Latvia by 16 percent and Poland by fully 22 percent.

…

According to an opinion poll conducted by the Bundeswehr, 51 percent of Germans are in favor of a larger defense budget and only 13 percent are opposed.

…

Every country is required to make a certain proportion of its armed forces available to the alliance: troops, aircraft, ships, land vehicles, personnel for NATO staffs.

…

The confidential figures show that not a single country has fulfilled the criteria, not even the United States, though they are far ahead, as are the United Kingdom, Denmark, Germany and Norway. Romania and Lithuania have not fulfilled a single requirement. Poland, whose defense budget looks very good when seen in relation to its economic output, only managed to fulfill two output categories in 2014.

Seeing as we have recently heard word from different prominent (((banking people))) concerning the issue that there is an economic crisis looming on the horizon, how will this beefing of the defense budget affect the economy in general?

If they want to spend more money on defense, they’ll need to save it somewhere else. If the economy isn’t going well, it becomes twice as difficult.

As such, public declarations have tended to go further than reality might allow. Rather than changing approach, it might be more accurate to speak of a “bottoming out,” a term stock brokers use to describe a stock that has hit rock bottom after a rapid tumble and, after catching its breath, has slowly begun to rise again.

On the evening of August 4, a mass protest against immigration took place at the government residence in Latvia’s capital Riga. The protest was mainly organised by Latvia’s National Alliance with the help of the Conservative People’s Party of Estonia. Around 1,500 people took part of the protest.

Protesters shouted slogans such as “Stop genocide against Latvians!” and “Stop genocide against White people!”

“Even the Russian immigrants who arrived in Latvia during Soviet occupation have failed to integrate,” said the organizers. “Even more, the immigrants who are starting to arrive now have a totally different culture, language and traditions compared to Latvian ones.”

“Today’s protest clearly indicated that Baltic people are strongly against immigration,” said Jaak Madison, the youngest MP of Estonia and probably the first member of an European legislation after 70 years who has said he is a National Socialist. “Immigration would have catastrophic consequences to the country’s social system and more than 80% of Latvians oppose it. We have always supported our Latvian brothers-in-arms and today’s protest was again a great example of this cooperation.”

The Baltic states are really showing the rest of Europe what nationalism should look like.

Even their Liberals sound like nationalists to the rest of us.

ERR:

Kristiina Ojuland, a former Foreign Minister of Estonia and former member of the European Parliament, voiced her disapproval of the European Commission’s migrant quota plan on her official Facebook page, by calling for a pan-European campaign against admitting any refugees in the EU.

In a post that was more reminiscent of a far-right extremist, than a former Vice President of the European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party (ALDE), Ojuland said that the “white race is threatened” by dark-skinned immigrants (Ojuland actually used an Estonian word “neeger” which is not officially considered offensive in Estonia, but nevertheless becoming socially unacceptable).

“Today yet again I see a fully able young Negro begging for money in Italy, from people who have worked hard to earn a lunch. I think that we should start a pan-European campaign to collect signatures to ensure that not a single so-called refugee gets across the Mediterranean. Enough of this nonsense!” Ojuland, the former high-ranking politician who for years campaigned Estonia to join the EU, wrote.

Her posting has so far gathered over 2,000 “likes”, 500 shares and 300 comments. While many people pointed out her offensive remarks and some called her racist, one would have thought that the former foreign minister would back down, but it didn’t turn out to be so. Instead, Ojuland chose to rigorously defend her statement and even went offensive against the moderate commentators who asked for common sense.

“Stop using a word ‘racist’! As a white person, I feel that the white race is threatened today! Are Estonians also so brain-washed now that they start talking some kind of politically correct bullshit?” Ojuland said.

Another reasonable commentator was told by former liberal MEP that by being a member of the European Union does not mean “accepting people who would squeeze Estonia’s social system”. “Estonia needs to say clear no to Mediterranean migrants!” exclaimed Ojuland.