Previously:

• Johns Hopkins Pulls Article Admitting That Coronavirus has Not Raised Total US Death Toll
• Fake Pandemic! Hoax! 401,000 Excess Deaths in 2017 But Only 376,504 in 2020
• Life Insurers Report 40% in Excess Deaths Since Rollout of the Vax

Is it one million excess deaths or one million coronavirus deaths?

Are those just the same thing now?

The Guardian:

There have been more than 1m excess deaths in the US during the pandemic, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The deaths are mainly attributable to Covid-19, as well as conditions that may have resulted from delayed medical care and overwhelmed health systems.

At least 923,000 Americans have died from confirmed Covid cases, according to the CDC. Other causes of death above the normally expected number have included heart disease, hypertension and Alzheimer’s disease.

Some Americans also die months after their initial Covid diagnosis, because the virus created other fatal complications.

Excess deaths are calculated by looking at previous years’ fatalities. In 2019, there were 2.8m deaths in the US; in 2020, it was approximately 3.3m.

“All-cause excess mortality is one of the most reliable and unbiased ways to look at the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic,” said Jeremy Faust, an emergency physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and an instructor at Harvard Medical School.

“It does not rely on how many tests were done or on subjective cause of death designations.”

While cause of death can sometimes be difficult to ascertain, and political pressures can lead to miscounting, excess deaths can indicate the broad scope of a health emergency.

“Whenever we hear that another 100,000 people died of Covid, there’s a reliable chorus of naysayers who claim that these deaths would’ve happened anyway,” Faust said. “Excess deaths cuts through that, because it’s about reporting whether the total number of deaths is out of the ordinary.”

The total number of deaths?

The total number of deaths is directly related to the total number of people, and the total number of people is directly related to the total number of past births.

An important thing to consider when looking at the total number of people who die in a year is how many people were born in the year you get by subtracting the age of the people who die.

When you find that more old people have died than what you expected, a logical question to ask is: could it be that there was an increase in births around the date of birth of these old timers?

If you divide the 2020 deaths by age group, and want to look at the ones from 65 year olds, you’d take 2020, subtract 65, and get 1955.

Oh, what’s that? An important bump from 1950 to 1955?

The Guardian said that in 2019, there were 2.8m deaths, and approximately 3.3m in 2020.

The Washington Post reports:

The CDC’s analysis estimates 208,431 excess deaths from all the non-covid causes since the start of the pandemic. At first glance, that number plus the 911,000 covid-19 deaths would suggest the excess deaths were greater than 1.1 million. But Anderson notes that many of the people who died of covid-19 were elderly, sick or very frail, and, even without a pandemic, some might not have survived across the two-year span of the pandemic. “Some of those covid deaths are not, strictly speaking, excess deaths,” he said.

…

The CDC has found that 74 percent of covid-19 deaths occurred among people age 65 and older. Anderson noted that many elderly and frail people found themselves isolated because of precautions against viral spread. During the initial wave of infections, when the country largely shut down, the quality of care for the most vulnerable populations probably suffered, Anderson said. Deaths from Alzheimer’s disease exceeded the expected total by 66,000 during the course of two years, he said.

There you have it.

Old people die because they’re old.

More old people die because more people were born in the years old people were born.

Also, the vax is killing people. People weren’t getting these mRNA things before 2021.

Raising the reproduction rate in a country is an easy task once you get rid of the people actively trying to suppress it. If the state creates conditions and incentives that compel women to marry and have children, the rest works itself out. Even though abortion was legal and women were expected to work, the Eastern bloc until the fall of the USSR always had a higher birth rate than Western Europe.

Poland’s “successful” transition towards a capitalist economy in the European Union has been lauded by American think-tanks since its neighbors in the Baltics are in pretty awful shape, but it’s just smoke and mirrors. The country is racked with unemployment and these people emigrate to other parts of Europe – an obvious birth-rate and population killer.

In response to this problem, the Polish government is now offering cash subsidies for families that have many children. This is a Soviet-era program they’re reviving, and it’s working.

New Europe:

The Dziennik Gazeta Prawna, a daily Polish newspaper, has reported that Poland is experiencing a baby boom, with about 400,000 more children to be born by the end of the year.

…

The daily reports that the reason behind this baby boom might be the country’s “500+” programme. This programme provides families with two or more children with a state handout of around PLN 500 (which equals €115) every month per child.

Imagine if instead of billions of euros being set aside to pay Arabs and blacks to entertain us with their wonderful presence, the German government used the money as an incentive for families who have children.

“Oy Vey,” the free marketeers would whine, “but then people won’t have an incentive to work!” Indeed, by supplementing women’s income, you encourage them to be stay-at-home mothers as nature intended. Additionally, the temporary drop in the labor market will cause wages for men to raise, which will lead to women seeing more men as eligible and attractive. Most women would rather stay home working and caring for the people who love them (husbands, children) than be forced to serve some CEO that sees them as a disposable cog to milk surplus value out of.

The question is, how long can the Poles keep doing this right under Judah’s big bulbous nose? That big schnoz casts a long shadow, and by being in the EU, Poland’s smack dab under it. The Jews have an almost cartoonish hatred towards Poles, more than even Germans.

The Jewish (NGOs, global media, Soros, etc) response to the Polish baby boom is to activate their cells of upper middle class Polish intelligentsia, well-versed in the latest globalist (((European))) and (((American))) political fashions, to destabilize the country in the name of abortion. 400,000 babies a year in a homogeneous nation of 38 million is enough of an emergency to get Madonna out there and personally lead the protests.

Will the normal people be able to hold out? They must first ruthlessly crush these protests by any means necessary. But even then, Poland’s baby boom is most likely an isolated event in the absence of a national revolution. Poland is the only white country that takes the Catholic Church seriously, and the Vatican’s not going to lead or defend them any time this century. The people of Poland can’t enjoy the short-term financial benefits of European Union entanglement and have their babies too.

Let’s see how this plays out. Expect to hear more about “Poland’s attack on women’s rights” on the news 24/7 though.